[Bug 1066356] Re: Regression: Bluetooth mouse does not reconnect after suspend
It's related to issue #1065157 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066356 Title: Regression: Bluetooth mouse does not reconnect after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1066356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888828] Re: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/bluetooth/hci0:1 2'
I still see it under 3.5.0-18-generic @ Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28 Title: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/bluetooth/hci0:1 2' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/28/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1065157] Re: 0a5c:2145 bluetooth mouse disconnects after sleep and resume
Confirmed on 3.5.0-17-generic. 1) Bluetooth manager occasionally crashes when registering mouse. 2) After suspend-resume mouse doesn't work, not possible to reconnect it using. Reboot needed :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065157 Title: 0a5c:2145 bluetooth mouse disconnects after sleep and resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1065157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890026] Re: Custom GNOME panel launcher icons lost upon upgrade to Oneiric
+1 I'm using gnome classic (no effects) under Oneric too, and I find managing application launchers in top panel very unfriendly. 1) There is no option to add a launcher icon using mouse-right, no one will guess that you have to create *.desktop file and drag it to the panel. 2) There is no option to remove such launcher from panel. Please add right menu to add application launcher and option to remove it from panel. Cheers! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890026 Title: Custom GNOME panel launcher icons lost upon upgrade to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/890026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874888] [NEW] Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon.
Public bug reported: When you close main kadu window it becomes hidden, but its icon remains in notification area (always worked that way). What is wrong is that there is no way to get kadu window back, because clicking on icon in notification are shows only options for changing activity status. This bug makes kadu completely unusable - you cannot get to application window in any way. P.S. Maybe it's because now unity doesn't make a difference if you click right or left mouse button on the icon in notification area. Clicking with left button used to be the way to get kadu window back. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: kadu 0.9.2-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Oct 15 11:03:42 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/kadu InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: kadu UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (0 days ago) ** Affects: kadu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874888 Title: Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kadu/+bug/874888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874888] Re: Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874888 Title: Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kadu/+bug/874888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874888] Re: Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon.
Piotr, I'm not sure if it's left-right click problem. Skype works fine under Oneric - I can left-click on the notification-area icon to restore main window, or right-click to see some options. Who let package with such critical bug to Oneric? And btw, half year ago kadu, when Unity came into play, kadu was also unusable, because its icon wasn't allowed to show in notification area. So we got not-working kadu bugs in last two releases of ubuntu. Does anybody test kadu in Ubuntu team, before release is made? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874888 Title: Impossible to use kadu - cannot trigger kadu window from notification area icon. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kadu/+bug/874888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683027] Re: Support for multiprocessing broken in python2.7
P.S. I tried this import under python2.7 installed from packages provided in Natty, and bug is not present, so it's only issue in Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683027 Title: Support for multiprocessing broken in python2.7 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683027] [NEW] Support for multiprocessing broken in python2.7
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python2.7 $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 $ apt-cache policy python2.7 python2.7: Installed: 2.7-6 Candidate: 2.7-6 Version table: *** 2.7-6 0 $ python2.7 Python 2.7.0+ (r27:82500, Sep 15 2010, 18:04:55) [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. from _multiprocessing import SemLock Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module ImportError: cannot import name SemLock Same works fine for 2.6 and 3.1 under Ubuntu. ** Affects: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Support for multiprocessing broken in python2.7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429496] Re: Can't locate Time/Progress.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.0 /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.10 /usr/share/p
It's duplicate of #317487 -- Can't locate Time/Progress.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.0 /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.10 /usr/share/perl/5.10 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/share/perl5/SVK/Notify.pm line 214. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317487] Re: 2.2.1 needs Time::Progress
WARNING: Don't add use_progress=0 like Tedd suggested, because after running some svk command you will *loose* your svk config - svk will overwrite it with a few new lines brand-new config, and become unusable!!! (Can't call method find on unblessed reference at /usr/share/perl5/SVK/XD.pm line 361.) That's what happened to me, and I can reproduce it. -- 2.2.1 needs Time::Progress https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] Re: Laptop brightness control problems
I've just lunched Karmin Koala Alpha 2 on my laptop, and problem is still there. When pressing brightness controll keys gnome brightness progress bar doesn't move, and screen brightnes changes for a moment, and screen always gets dimmed. If you need further info I'm here. -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] Re: Laptop brightness control problems
** Attachment added: lscpi http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27958160/lspci.txt -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] Re: Laptop brightness control problems
** Attachment added: /etc/X11/xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27958191/xorg.conf -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] Re: Laptop brightness control problems
Yeah, you're right - xorg uses Intel driver in my case. ** Attachment added: Xorg log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27958431/Xorg.0.log -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201544] Re: mplayer brightness reduces on playback
Confirmed on ubuntu jaunty. When starting playback in VLC and mplayer laptop screen brightness is set to lowest possible value. It's been happening on intrepid and now, jaunty, and is very annoying, because I have to increase brightness manually every time I start playback. -- mplayer brightness reduces on playback https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] [NEW] Laptop brightness control problems
Public bug reported: Ubuntu: 9.04 Laptop: Lenovo 3000 N100 uname: Linux lestaro 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Problems: a) After upgrade to 9.04 jaunty laptop brightness cannot be adjusted properly: * Fn + brightness+ switch between dark and less darker (look) * Fn + brightness- turns screen darked, only one step available b) Brightness applet is almost unusable: screen is heavy flickering all the time when adjusting brightness, just like mentioned in Bug #368506. To fix: brigthness adjusting via Fn keys and via brightness apllet. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369777] Re: Laptop brightness control problems
** Attachment added: lspci -vvv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26174471/lspci.txt -- Laptop brightness control problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162253] Re: openssh: want hpn-ssh for 20x speed improvement!
Yeah, one vote from me! -- openssh: want hpn-ssh for 20x speed improvement! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
RE: YaSSL doesn't support certs from mozilla (New) By: Todd Ouska (touskaProject Admin) - 2009-01-07 21:35 Hi, Actually, looking closer at your other post on launchpad you've already identified the problem. The PEM formatting of the ubuntu provided cert is incorrect. Each line except the last should be 64 characters (not 60). It's interesting to note that Mozilla correctly exported the PEM file for me. Not sure how they're doing it or which version of the truststore they're using. Thanks for the report. -- ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
Pasting new comments from http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2817179forum_id=439591 RE: YaSSL doesn't support certs from mozilla (New) By: Todd Ouska (touskaProject Admin) - 2009-01-07 21:17 Hi, Yes, yaSSL supports PEM certificates from the Mozilla truststore. The problem I'm getting in duplicating this report is that both geotrust.com and Firefox 3.0.5 (Mozilla 5.0) are giving me the same cert. MD5: 6c4c4791d77d8848f0907511a0bf686e The same one you're getting from geotrust.com. Can you send me the ubuntu cert to todd at yassl.com . And I'll be happy to look at it. -- ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314710] [NEW] ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ca-certificates Ubuntu 8.10 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 As example I will use just one certificate provided by package ca- certificates, but the problem concerns more of them. Those certificates (pasted a few lines below) differ only in line length, content is the same. Command `openssl x509 -in crt -text -noout` prints exactly same output for both certs. ...but when use for mySQL server (+yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only* Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer success. For debian provided cert I get SSL Connection error, which means server certificete doesn't validate or other error with certificate. Shouldn't ubuntu-provided certificate be exactly the same as provided by root CA? It would prevent from errors I just mentioned. Here are both certificates: Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer (downloaded from http://www.geotrust.com/resources/root-certificates/) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEc MBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1aWZheCBT ZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0MDAwMFoXDTIw MDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoTE0VxdWlmYXggU2Vj dXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5l c3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnC UdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQytd4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc 58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORROhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/ o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2ECAwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAH MA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1dr aGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6ooHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA A4GBADDiAVGqx+pf2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkA Z70Br83gcfxaz2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv 8qIYNMR1pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA.crt (shipped with ubuntu/ca-certificates) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJV UzEcMBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1 aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0 MDAwMFoXDTIwMDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoT E0VxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJl IEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5lc3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnCUdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQy td4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORR OhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2EC AwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAHMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8w HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1draGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6o oHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADDiAVGqx+pf 2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkAZ70Br83gcfxa z2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv8qIYNMR1 pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- ** Affects: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ca-certificates Ubuntu 8.10 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 - Those certificates differ only in line lenght, content is the same. + As example I will use just one certificate provided by package ca- + certificates, but the problem concerns more of them. + + Those certificates (pasted few lines below) differ only in line lenght, content is the same. Command `openssl x509 -in crt -text -noout` prints exactly same output for both certs. ...but when use for mySQL server (+yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only* Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer success. For debian provided cert I get SSL Connection error, which means server certificete doesn't validate or other error with certificate. Shouldn't ubuntu-provided certificate be exactly the same as provided by root CA? It would prevent from errors I just mentioned. Here are both certificates: Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer (downloaded from http://www.geotrust.com/resources/root-certificates/) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEc MBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1aWZheCBT ZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0MDAwMFoXDTIw MDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoTE0VxdWlmYXggU2Vj dXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5l c3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnC UdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQytd4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc 58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORROhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/ o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2ECAwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAH MA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1dr aGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6ooHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
** Description changed: Binary package hint: ca-certificates Ubuntu 8.10 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 As example I will use just one certificate provided by package ca- certificates, but the problem concerns more of them. Those certificates (pasted a few lines below) differ only in line length, content is the same. + Debian-provided cert has 60-chars lines, and the one downloaded via web has 64-chars lines, just like RFC 1421 suggests: + To represent the encapsulated text of a PEM message, the encoding function's output is delimited into text lines (using local conventions), with each line except the last containing exactly 64 printable characters and the final line containing 64 or fewer printable characters. + + Command `openssl x509 -in crt -text -noout` prints exactly same output for both certs. ...but when use for mySQL server (+yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only* Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer success. For debian provided cert I get SSL Connection error, which means server certificete doesn't validate or other error with certificate. - Shouldn't ubuntu-provided certificate be exactly the same as provided by - root CA? It would prevent from errors I just mentioned. + Shouldn't ubuntu-provided certificate be exactly the same as provided by root CA and be valid with RFC1421? + It would prevent from errors I just mentioned. + Here are both certificates: Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer (downloaded from http://www.geotrust.com/resources/root-certificates/) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEc MBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1aWZheCBT ZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0MDAwMFoXDTIw MDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoTE0VxdWlmYXggU2Vj dXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5l c3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnC UdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQytd4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc 58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORROhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/ o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2ECAwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAH MA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1dr aGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6ooHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA A4GBADDiAVGqx+pf2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkA Z70Br83gcfxaz2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv 8qIYNMR1pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA.crt (shipped with ubuntu/ca-certificates) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJV UzEcMBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1 aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0 MDAwMFoXDTIwMDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoT E0VxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJl IEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5lc3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnCUdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQy td4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORR OhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2EC AwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAHMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8w HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1draGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6o oHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADDiAVGqx+pf 2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkAZ70Br83gcfxa z2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv8qIYNMR1 pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- -- ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
** Description changed: Binary package hint: ca-certificates Ubuntu 8.10 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 As example I will use just one certificate provided by package ca- certificates, but the problem concerns more of them. Those certificates (pasted a few lines below) differ only in line length, content is the same. Debian-provided cert has 60-chars lines, and the one downloaded via web has 64-chars lines, just like RFC 1421 suggests: To represent the encapsulated text of a PEM message, the encoding function's output is delimited into text lines (using local conventions), with each line except the last containing exactly 64 printable characters and the final line containing 64 or fewer printable characters. Command `openssl x509 -in crt -text -noout` prints exactly same output for both certs. - ...but when use for mySQL server (+yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only* Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer success. For debian provided cert I get SSL Connection error, which means server certificete doesn't validate or other error with certificate. + So far, all seem to be fine, but ...but for example when I use these CA certs for mySQL server (with yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only* Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer success. For debian provided cert I get SSL Connection error, which means server certificete doesn't validate or other error with certificate. Shouldn't ubuntu-provided certificate be exactly the same as provided by root CA and be valid with RFC1421? It would prevent from errors I just mentioned. Here are both certificates: Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer (downloaded from http://www.geotrust.com/resources/root-certificates/) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEc MBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1aWZheCBT ZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0MDAwMFoXDTIw MDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoTE0VxdWlmYXggU2Vj dXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5l c3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnC UdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQytd4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc 58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORROhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/ o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2ECAwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAH MA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1dr aGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6ooHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA A4GBADDiAVGqx+pf2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkA Z70Br83gcfxaz2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv 8qIYNMR1pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA.crt (shipped with ubuntu/ca-certificates) -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIICkDCCAfmgAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBaMQswCQYDVQQGEwJV UzEcMBoGA1UEChMTRXF1aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgSW5jLjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkRXF1 aWZheCBTZWN1cmUgR2xvYmFsIGVCdXNpbmVzcyBDQS0xMB4XDTk5MDYyMTA0 MDAwMFoXDTIwMDYyMTA0MDAwMFowWjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxHDAaBgNVBAoT E0VxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJlIEluYy4xLTArBgNVBAMTJEVxdWlmYXggU2VjdXJl IEdsb2JhbCBlQnVzaW5lc3MgQ0EtMTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEAuucXkAJlsTRVPEnCUdXfp9E3j9HngXNBUmCbnaEXJnitx7HoJpQy td4zjTov2/KaelpzmKNc6fuKcxtc58O/gGzNqfTWK8D3+ZmqY6KxRwIP1ORR OhI8bIpaVIRw28HFkM9yRcuoWcDNM50/o5brhTMhHD4ePmBudpxnhcXIw2EC AwEAAaNmMGQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgAHMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8w HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvqigdHJQa0S3ySPY+6j/s1draGwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFL6o oHRyUGtEt8kj2Puo/7NXa2hsMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADDiAVGqx+pf 2rnQZQ8w1j7aDRRJbpGTJxQx78T3LUX47Me/okENI7SS+RkAZ70Br83gcfxa z2TE4JaY0KNA4gGK7ycH8WUBikQtBmV1UsCGECAhX2xrD2yuCRyv8qIYNMR1 pHMc8Y3c7635s3a0kr/clRAevsvIO1qEYBlWlKlV -END CERTIFICATE- ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ca-certificates Ubuntu 8.10 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 As example I will use just one certificate provided by package ca- certificates, but the problem concerns more of them. Those certificates (pasted a few lines below) differ only in line length, content is the same. Debian-provided cert has 60-chars lines, and the one downloaded via web has 64-chars lines, just like RFC 1421 suggests: To represent the encapsulated text of a PEM message, the encoding function's output is delimited into text lines (using local conventions), with each line except the last containing exactly 64 printable characters and the final line containing 64 or fewer printable characters. Command `openssl x509 -in crt -text -noout` prints exactly same output for both certs. - So far, all seem to be fine, but ...but for example when I use these CA certs for mySQL server (with yassl) certificate validation on client's side (mysql ... --ssl-verify-server-cert) *only*
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
Hello! Point is that some applications don't support non-RFC-compliant certificates. My first *guess* is default MySQL SSL implementation - yassl - which is compiled into MySQL binary provided by MySQL, and also debian-like operating systems. Help me to decide what to do further with this issue, I'm really not sure which door to knock at: - debian/ubuntu ca-certificates maintainers - yassl devs - mozilla devs Btw. What you mean by so obviously it's not RFC-compliant in there? Why certs come from Mozilla truststore are considered to be non-RFC-compilant? -- ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314710] Re: ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA
I created thread concerning this issue on YaSSL developers forum: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2817179forum_id=439591 -- ca-certificates differ from those provided by root CA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63526] Re: fail to resume after suspend to RAM on HP NX8220
I've just upgraded to gutsy with kernel 2.6.22-14-generic and bug still exists: after suspension to ram I can't get my laptop (nx8220) wake up. -- fail to resume after suspend to RAM on HP NX8220 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
