[Bug 1327268] Re: sudo-ldap segfaults in 14.04 if ldap is being used
I talked to Todd C. Miller, the author of sudo, who proposed the
following patch:
diff -r 6c0cc2def911 plugins/sudoers/ldap.c
--- a/plugins/sudoers/ldap.cWed Jun 04 11:43:39 2014 -0600
+++ b/plugins/sudoers/ldap.cMon Jun 16 13:41:02 2014 -0600
@@ -2429,10 +2429,11 @@
rc = ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s(ld, ldap_conf.binddn, GSSAPI,
NULL, NULL, LDAP_SASL_QUIET, sudo_ldap_sasl_interact, auth_id);
if (new_ccname != NULL) {
- rc = sudo_set_krb5_ccache_name(old_ccname, NULL);
+ rc = sudo_set_krb5_ccache_name(old_ccname ? old_ccname : , NULL);
if (rc == 0) {
sudo_debug_printf(SUDO_DEBUG_INFO|SUDO_DEBUG_LINENO,
- restore ccache name %s - %s, new_ccname, old_ccname);
+ restore ccache name %s - %s, new_ccname,az
+ old_ccname ? old_ccname : (none));
} else {
sudo_debug_printf(SUDO_DEBUG_WARN|SUDO_DEBUG_LINENO,
gss_krb5_ccache_name() failed: %d, rc);
We tested it in my 14.04LTS amd64 (sudo 1.8.9p5) install and that solved
the problem. The above patch will be incorporated in the next version of
sudo. But, I am posting it here in case someone wants to backport it to
the sudo 1.8.9 ubuntu package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327268
Title:
sudo-ldap segfaults in 14.04 if ldap is being used
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1327268/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327268] [NEW] sudo-ldap segfaults in 14.04 if ldap is being used
Public bug reported: NOTE: I was asked in https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+question/249819 to report this as a bug. raub@testfirewall:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Release: 14.04 Codename: trusty raub@testfirewall:~$ uname -a Linux testfirewall 3.13.0-27-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 15 18:06:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux raub@testfirewall:~$ and have before upgrading to 14.04 been using sudo-ldap so network admins can do some work. However, in 14.04, I am seeing raub@testfirewall:~$ sudo pwd sudo: LDAP Config Summary sudo: === sudo: uri ldap://kdc.domain.com ldap://kdc2.domain.com sudo: ldap_version 3 sudo: sudoers_base ou=SUDOers,dc=domain,dc=com sudo: binddn (anonymous) sudo: bindpw (anonymous) sudo: bind_timelimit 3 sudo: timelimit 3 sudo: deref 0 sudo: ssl start_tls sudo: tls_cacertfile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt sudo: use_sasl yes sudo: sasl_auth_id (NONE) sudo: rootuse_sasl -1 sudo: rootsasl_auth_id (NONE) sudo: sasl_secprops (NONE) sudo: krb5_ccname FILE:/tmp/host.tkt sudo: === sudo: ldap_set_option: debug - 0 sudo: ldap_set_option: tls_cacertfile - /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt sudo: ldap_set_option: tls_cacert - /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt sudo: ldap_initialize(ld, ldap://kdc.domain.com ldap://kdc2.domain.com) sudo: ldap_set_option: ldap_version - 3 sudo: ldap_set_option: timelimit - 3 sudo: ldap_set_option(LDAP_OPT_TIMEOUT, 3) sudo: ldap_set_option(LDAP_OPT_NETWORK_TIMEOUT, 3) sudo: ldap_start_tls_s() ok sudo: sudo_ldap_sasl_interact: SASL_CB_USER Segmentation fault (core dumped) raub@testfirewall:~$ From syslog: Jun 5 15:16:26 testfirewall kernel: [2068248.457275] sudo[22925]: segfault at 0 ip 7f2feb02692a sp 755073b8 error 4 in libc-2.19.so[7f2feaf9d000+1bc000] That affects both local and network users *and* was observed in a new install and an upgrade from 12.04LTS. Now, if I disable ldap for sudoers in /etc/nsswitch.conf, # sudoers: files ldap sudoers: files I can sudo from a local user with sudo rights. What am I missing here? ** Affects: sudo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327268 Title: sudo-ldap segfaults in 14.04 if ldap is being used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1327268/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1323704] [NEW] main.cf silently modified during postfix 2.9.1-4 upgrade on 12.04LTS
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.9.6-1~12.04.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
I did apt-get upgrade to the host in question and found out that
/etc/postfix/main.cf was silently changed (I was not asked to
validateverify changes)
(/var/log/apt/term.log)
Setting up mail-stack-delivery (1:2.0.19-0ubuntu2.1) ...^M
Mail stack delivery changes some postfix settings.^M
Old values are stored in /var/backups/mail-stack-delivery/main.cf-backup.^M
Feel free to revert any of them when the process is done.^M
Configuring postfix for mail-stack-delivery integration:
done.^M
Change summary:
1. It decided to change my tls files to default values
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-mail.key
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-mail.pem
2. It deleted entries in smtpd_recipient_restrictions
diff /etc/postfix/main.cf /tmp/main.cf
45c45,56
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
---
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
check_sender_mx_access cidr:/etc/postfix/bogus_mx,
permit
118,123d128
smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-mail-stack-delivery.conf -m ${EXTENSION}
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1
smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium
and changed the command used by postfix to pass emails to dovecot. Note
that before I had a command similar to the mailbox_comand but in
/etc/postfix/main.cf,
flags=DRhu user=virtual:virtual argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-dovecot-postfix.conf -f ${sender} -d ${recipient}
Which was then rewritten as
flags=DRhu user=virtual:virtual argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-mail-stack-delivery.conf -f ${sender} -d
${recipient}
as dovecot-lda replaces deliver for dovecot 2.X. Incidentally, deliver
is now an alias to dovecot-lda,
ls -lh /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 May 14 14:24 /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver - dovecot-lda
probably as a stopgap until people change their configs.
3. There are a few more additions done to main.cf but they do not seem
to be bad, so I am going to brush over them.
So, why was the file changed without warning? Were some of the options
I used -- reject_rbl_client comes to mind -- deprecated? Still that does
not warrant a silent change.
** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1323704
Title:
main.cf silently modified during postfix 2.9.1-4 upgrade on 12.04LTS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1323704/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1323704] [NEW] main.cf silently modified during postfix 2.9.1-4 upgrade on 12.04LTS
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.9.6-1~12.04.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
I did apt-get upgrade to the host in question and found out that
/etc/postfix/main.cf was silently changed (I was not asked to
validateverify changes)
(/var/log/apt/term.log)
Setting up mail-stack-delivery (1:2.0.19-0ubuntu2.1) ...^M
Mail stack delivery changes some postfix settings.^M
Old values are stored in /var/backups/mail-stack-delivery/main.cf-backup.^M
Feel free to revert any of them when the process is done.^M
Configuring postfix for mail-stack-delivery integration:
done.^M
Change summary:
1. It decided to change my tls files to default values
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-mail.key
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-mail.pem
2. It deleted entries in smtpd_recipient_restrictions
diff /etc/postfix/main.cf /tmp/main.cf
45c45,56
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
---
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
check_sender_mx_access cidr:/etc/postfix/bogus_mx,
permit
118,123d128
smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-mail-stack-delivery.conf -m ${EXTENSION}
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1
smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium
and changed the command used by postfix to pass emails to dovecot. Note
that before I had a command similar to the mailbox_comand but in
/etc/postfix/main.cf,
flags=DRhu user=virtual:virtual argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-dovecot-postfix.conf -f ${sender} -d ${recipient}
Which was then rewritten as
flags=DRhu user=virtual:virtual argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -c
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-mail-stack-delivery.conf -f ${sender} -d
${recipient}
as dovecot-lda replaces deliver for dovecot 2.X. Incidentally, deliver
is now an alias to dovecot-lda,
ls -lh /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 May 14 14:24 /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver - dovecot-lda
probably as a stopgap until people change their configs.
3. There are a few more additions done to main.cf but they do not seem
to be bad, so I am going to brush over them.
So, why was the file changed without warning? Were some of the options
I used -- reject_rbl_client comes to mind -- deprecated? Still that does
not warrant a silent change.
** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1323704
Title:
main.cf silently modified during postfix 2.9.1-4 upgrade on 12.04LTS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1323704/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1245921] [NEW] postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory
Public bug reported: Related to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+question/237854 When upgrading slapd, I observed the following: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Setting up slapd (2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.4) ... Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.3... cp: cannot overwrite directory `/var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.3/slapd.d' with non-directory dpkg: error processing slapd (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: slapd E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) root@ubuntu:~# Now, I take the reason it did not like my /etc/ldap/slapd.d is because it is an alias (/etc/ldap/slapd.d - /export/ldap/slapd). But, why should it care? There are many ways to copy an alias and expand it in the process. And, I have not noticed such behaviour before. Did something change in apt or openldap to make the postinstall annoyed at the alias? The proposed solution/workaround worked but it still possible that it will fail next time. ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245921 Title: postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1245921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1245921] [NEW] postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory
Public bug reported: Related to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+question/237854 When upgrading slapd, I observed the following: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Setting up slapd (2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.4) ... Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.3... cp: cannot overwrite directory `/var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.3/slapd.d' with non-directory dpkg: error processing slapd (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: slapd E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) root@ubuntu:~# Now, I take the reason it did not like my /etc/ldap/slapd.d is because it is an alias (/etc/ldap/slapd.d - /export/ldap/slapd). But, why should it care? There are many ways to copy an alias and expand it in the process. And, I have not noticed such behaviour before. Did something change in apt or openldap to make the postinstall annoyed at the alias? The proposed solution/workaround worked but it still possible that it will fail next time. ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245921 Title: postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1245921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941212] Re: /etc/dovecot/README gives wrong path to example configuration files
According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, and http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, the examples are in the dovecot-core package (/usr/share/doc/dovecot-core/dovecot/example-config/) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941212 Title: /etc/dovecot/README gives wrong path to example configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/941212/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 941212] Re: /etc/dovecot/README gives wrong path to example configuration files
According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, and http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/dovecot- core/filelist, the examples are in the dovecot-core package (/usr/share/doc/dovecot-core/dovecot/example-config/) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941212 Title: /etc/dovecot/README gives wrong path to example configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/941212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199040] [NEW] Update dahdi-linux to a supported version (2.5.1 or newer)
Public bug reported: According to http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux- complete/, 2.5.0 is not considered a current version. Would it be possible to provide something newer? ** Affects: dahdi-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/make.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199040/+attachment/3729371/+files/make.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199040 Title: Update dahdi-linux to a supported version (2.5.1 or newer) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199081] [NEW] Cannot rebuild dahdi-2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 because it cannot find asm/system.h
Public bug reported:
I am installing Asterisk 1.8 + dahdi + wanpipe (which I will be
installing manually) in ubuntu 12.04LTS. So I begin by doing
apt-get install asterisk asterisk-dahdi asterisk-dev asterisk-mysql
mysql-server curl asterisk-mp3 unzip
apt-get install build-essential libncurses5-dev flex bison libtool automake
autoconf
So, I decided to find out if dkms knows of dahdi (in reality, when I was
compiling wanpipe, it barked about not finding dahdi):
dpkg -l |grep dahdi
ii asterisk-dahdi1:1.8.22.0-1digium1~precise DAHDI
devices support for the Asterisk PBX
ii dahdi 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 utilities
for using the DAHDI kernel modules
ii dahdi-dkms1:2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 DAHDI
telephony interface (dkms kernel driver)
ii dahdi-linux 1:2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 DAHDI
telephony interface - Linux userspace parts
ii dahdi-source 1:2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 DAHDI
telephony interface - source code for kernel driver
dkms status
dahdi, 2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2: added
Let's check if it is all well:
modprobe dahdi_dummy
FATAL: Module dahdi_dummy not found.
Not good, so we will try installing it manually:
DAHDI_VERSION=`dkms status | grep dahdi | head -n 1 | awk '{ print $2}'
| tr -d :` dkms build -m dahdi -v ${DAHDI_VERSION}
Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping...
Building module:
cleaning build area
(make modules KERNVER=3.5.0-36-generic MODULES_EXTRA='dahdi_dummy wcopenpci dah)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.5.0-36-generic (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/make.log for more infor.
In /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/make.log we find that
it cannot find asm/system.h:
/opvxd115.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/voicebus.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/GpakCust.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/GpakApi.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/voicebus_net.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/vpmoct.o
LD [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/voicebus
/dahdi_voicebus.o
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/
base.o
/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.c:38:
46: fatal error: asm/system.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4
xxp/base.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4
xxp] Error 2
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/da
hdi] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.5.0-36-generic'
make: *** [modules] Error 2
make -C /lib/modules/3.5.0-36-generic/build SUBDIRS=/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+
dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi DAHDI_INCLUDE=/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg
-1ubuntu2/build/include DAHDI_MODULES_EXTRA= HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules DAH
DI_BUILD_ALL=m
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.5.0-36-generic'
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/
base.o
/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.c:38:
46: fatal error: asm/system.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4
xxp/base.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/dahdi/wcb4
xxp] Error 2
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/drivers/da
hdi] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.5.0-36-generic'
make: *** [modules] Error 2
make -C drivers/dahdi/firmware firmware-loaders
which reminds me of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
graphics-drivers/+bug/993506 (i.e. drop asm/system.h already!). I have
no issues compiling from source (per http://wiki.sangoma.com/wanpipe-
linux-asterisk-dahdi).
Any suggestions?
** Affects: dahdi-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199081
Title:
Cannot rebuild dahdi-2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 because it cannot find
asm/system.h
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199081/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199081] Re: Cannot rebuild dahdi-2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 because it cannot find asm/system.h
I believe the main reason for this issue is because this is a fresh install of 12.04LTS, i.e. uses backported kernels from 12.10/13.04; uname -a Linux voip 3.5.0-36-generic #57~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 20 18:21:09 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Which probably might explain why the asm/system.h file is no longer available to this ubuntu release (12.04LTS). Ideal solution IMHO is to just start using a release of dahdi-linux 2.5.0, as mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi- linux/+bug/1199040 ** Attachment added: /var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2/build/make.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199081/+attachment/3729519/+files/make.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199081 Title: Cannot rebuild dahdi-2.5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 because it cannot find asm/system.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199040] Re: Update dahdi-linux to a supported version (2.5.1 or newer)
Another reason to upgrade is the asm/system.h issue, as mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199081 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199040 Title: Update dahdi-linux to a supported version (2.5.1 or newer) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069240] [NEW] package lrzsz 0.12.21-5 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system
Public bug reported: Was trying to install openssh-server and then got a crash report ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: lrzsz 0.12.21-5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic 3.2.30 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14 AptOrdering: lrzsz: Install minicom: Install lrzsz: Configure minicom: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Oct 20 19:18:36 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Unpacking lrzsz (from .../lrzsz_0.12.21-5_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lrzsz_0.12.21-5_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system DuplicateSignature: Unpacking lrzsz (from .../lrzsz_0.12.21-5_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lrzsz_0.12.21-5_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system ErrorMessage: unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120822.4) SourcePackage: lrzsz Title: package lrzsz 0.12.21-5 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lrzsz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069240 Title: package lrzsz 0.12.21-5 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create `/usr/bin/rz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/bin/rz'): Read-only file system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lrzsz/+bug/1069240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997096] Re: nscd segmentation fault
Just to let anyone know, it still happens in 12.04: Sep 20 14:29:21 ubuntu64 kernel: [84118.210121] nscd[17964]: segfault at 0 ip 7f6d44ef2b91 sp 7f6d3d9515e8 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f6d44e6a000+1b3000] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997096 Title: nscd segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/997096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997096] Re: nscd segmentation fault
In 12.04, after I went to /etc/nscd.conf and changed enable-cachenetgroupyes to enable-cachenetgroupno and restarted nscd, I stopped seeing segfault messages in my syslog file. Is this the solution? I honestly do not know, but it has worked for me... so far. ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997096 Title: nscd segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/997096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046987] [NEW] nscd should start after nslcd if both are present
Public bug reported: If nslcd and nscd are both installed on a machine, that means we are doing ldap. Which means nslcd needs to first talk to ldap and then have nscd do its thing by querying nslcd. Therefore, we really want /etc/init.d/nscd to have something like: # Should-Start: nslcd # Should-Stop: nslcd Reference (because I forget things): http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/ ** Affects: eglibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046987 Title: nscd should start after nslcd if both are present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1046987/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046987] Re: nscd should start after nslcd if both are present
** Description changed: If nslcd and nscd are both installed on a machine, that means we are doing ldap. Which means nslcd needs to first talk to ldap and then have nscd do its thing by querying nslcd. Therefore, we really want /etc/init.d/nscd to have something like: - Should-Start: nslcd - Should-Stop: nslcd + # Should-Start: nslcd + # Should-Stop: nslcd + + Reference (because I forget things): + http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046987 Title: nscd should start after nslcd if both are present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1046987/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046987] Re: nscd should start after nslcd if both are present
I believe that http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1335022 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss-pam-ldapd/+bug/806761 are related since they show a better way to do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046987 Title: nscd should start after nslcd if both are present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1046987/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1042856] [NEW] libapache2-mod-auth-kerb using krb5passwd and keepalive and credential delegation loses delegation after first request on connection
Public bug reported:
This is a bug that was reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687975; does it also affect
ubuntu? Reason I ask is that I seem to be able to reproduce it in 12.04.
Steps:
1. Need php5-ldap libapache2-mod-auth-kerb libsasl2-modules-ldap
2. Configure apache host to do kerberos, including having a keytab for apache.
3. Setup the apache virtual host site to use mod_auth_kerb:
Location /
Options FollowSymLinks
AuthType Kerberos
KrbAuthRealms DOMAIN.COM
KrbServiceName HTTP
Krb5Keytab /etc/apache2/krb5.keytab
KrbMethodNegotiate on
KrbMethodK5Passwd on
# The saveCredentials entry is important for php to get KRB5CCNAME
KrbSaveCredentials on
Require valid-user
/Location
4. create test.php (yes I am using php) file:
html
head
titlePHP Test/title
/head
body
h1PHP Kerberos Test/h1
?php
// LDAP parameters
echo user = {$_SERVER['PHP_AUTH_USER']}br/;
echo REMOTE_USER={$_SERVER['REMOTE_USER']}br/;
echo KRB5CCNAME={$_SERVER['KRB5CCNAME']}br/;
exit();
?
/body
/html
5. Connect to page. First time you log in you should see something like:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_0156Pt
6. Immediately reload page. You will now see
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=
7. Wait 15 seconds and try again:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_Q3sMmK
Did I missconfigure anything?
** Affects: libapache-mod-auth-kerb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libapache-mod-auth-kerb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042856
Title:
libapache2-mod-auth-kerb using krb5passwd and keepalive and credential
delegation loses delegation after first request on connection
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-auth-kerb/+bug/1042856/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1042856] [NEW] libapache2-mod-auth-kerb using krb5passwd and keepalive and credential delegation loses delegation after first request on connection
Public bug reported:
This is a bug that was reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687975; does it also affect
ubuntu? Reason I ask is that I seem to be able to reproduce it in 12.04.
Steps:
1. Need php5-ldap libapache2-mod-auth-kerb libsasl2-modules-ldap
2. Configure apache host to do kerberos, including having a keytab for apache.
3. Setup the apache virtual host site to use mod_auth_kerb:
Location /
Options FollowSymLinks
AuthType Kerberos
KrbAuthRealms DOMAIN.COM
KrbServiceName HTTP
Krb5Keytab /etc/apache2/krb5.keytab
KrbMethodNegotiate on
KrbMethodK5Passwd on
# The saveCredentials entry is important for php to get KRB5CCNAME
KrbSaveCredentials on
Require valid-user
/Location
4. create test.php (yes I am using php) file:
html
head
titlePHP Test/title
/head
body
h1PHP Kerberos Test/h1
?php
// LDAP parameters
echo user = {$_SERVER['PHP_AUTH_USER']}br/;
echo REMOTE_USER={$_SERVER['REMOTE_USER']}br/;
echo KRB5CCNAME={$_SERVER['KRB5CCNAME']}br/;
exit();
?
/body
/html
5. Connect to page. First time you log in you should see something like:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_0156Pt
6. Immediately reload page. You will now see
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=
7. Wait 15 seconds and try again:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_Q3sMmK
Did I missconfigure anything?
** Affects: libapache-mod-auth-kerb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042856
Title:
libapache2-mod-auth-kerb using krb5passwd and keepalive and credential
delegation loses delegation after first request on connection
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-auth-kerb/+bug/1042856/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007094] [NEW] gpg --clearsign does not create the -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- tag
Public bug reported: Input file: raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ cat pickles Hey there! Think of the metaphysical consequences! Banana banana banana! raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ Now, run gpg --clearsign pickles, creating pickles.asc. And then see its contents: raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ cat pickles.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey there! Think of the metaphysical consequences! Banana banana banana! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPx8l7AAoJECyBIzVoGuw2hG0H+gM8iv33q2g21MDlbNXb8nKt SdKxkBA6XYF5jC6mXanlG0FeOkAqW4nJgWTC3p3AcsKWVrP+IZY3ok1F+cSKXDrW a2r1Yu0EojrS0cP29+bSB6gQqKu8yPpsyc11Hc3RGXzNdTIzlUBTK444ND6la13U z2Nhdgz9lsefla02ESayx0+zZMQ1h1wR77VGcXnBx/yQwePEkX8a/ieQJ7Vp6ts4 w/FZJlY4GQDzWLQJc1lafHPVaA4JXok5i4hNvfHpIAaId3mINDt17dXbBtmPC/1D Le92XgGiq4qu6/FpfLcXkX8xcHGq+a8zxuyY4/NNTREX7/EyfYsXE0hwsld2IVs= =jb46 -END PGP SIGNATURE- raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ As you can see, no -END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- tag present. raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 Codename: oneiric raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ ** Affects: gnupg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007094 Title: gpg --clearsign does not create the -END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- tag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg/+bug/1007094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007094] Re: gpg --clearsign does not create the -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- tag
I see your point. What initially confused me is that I received a pgp message from launchpad (confirming registration of an OpenPGP key for use in Launchpad) that looked like this: -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) hQEMA6xYi9qZ9bGeAQf+Mi0gsfGNiR9Deh6NaN/32ap25Qy4XKT8z6/eP9n0qVsv SraSDAhSH5p/QfCRApkvnYJ6UoX/xksIYjIx/bwBSYd1SqgiwOIqF6HMrtgoH14N [...] lUhWtaRWlqeQxf2gRODwC2Q+soJeatcJJ2HNDFEyrnyLU+/OMZufYaZe1HewQl8/ 786Kf7r+cKqwZEVko9KUVUfBiXUj =2CxK -END PGP MESSAGE- That and the fact that signatures are enclosed by -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- and -END PGP SIGNATURE- made me believe that by consistency's sake the same would happen with the PGP SIGNED MESSAGE tag. I guess we need to ask the author... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007094 Title: gpg --clearsign does not create the -END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- tag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg/+bug/1007094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007094] Re: gpg --clearsign does not create the -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- tag
So, the '-END PGP SIGNATURE-' suffices to end the message? I can live with that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007094 Title: gpg --clearsign does not create the -END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- tag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg/+bug/1007094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004104] [NEW] On nagios.html, who is server1, server2?
Public bug reported: From reading the page carefully, it seems server1: nagios server server2: nagios client I believe either renaming them, such as server1 --- nagios-server server2 --- nagios-client1 (so we can then say now, let's define a second nagios client, nagios-client2...) Otherwise, just define what server1 and server2 are in the beginning of the document. ** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004104 Title: On nagios.html, who is server1, server2? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1004104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444046] Re: rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work
Ok, it seems a workaround is to first go to mysql (assuming this is the db you are using), and grant all privileges to the rt database (rt3 in this example) to the rt user (rtuser) but *without* creating the database itself. Then run rt-setup-database-3.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444046 Title: rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker3.8/+bug/444046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444046] Re: rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work
Update: This still happens with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and RT 3.8.7-1. I also tried on 10.10 and RT 3.8.8-4. And 11.04 and RT 3.8.10.-1. Issue still remains on all these combinations. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444046 Title: rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker3.8/+bug/444046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Lockfile part of this bug was addressed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/722770 Serge, is there a way for me to try that in 10.10 or 10.04LTS? I do not have natty and need it in 10.04LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Serge, NVM, I tested in 10.10 and they work. /etc/default/openipmi is created and /etc/init.d/openipmi correctly points to /etc/default/openipmi and /var/lock/ipmi. So, looks like a winner to me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Lockfile part of this bug was addressed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/722770 Serge, is there a way for me to try that in 10.10 or 10.04LTS? I do not have natty and need it in 10.04LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Serge, NVM, I tested in 10.10 and they work. /etc/default/openipmi is created and /etc/init.d/openipmi correctly points to /etc/default/openipmi and /var/lock/ipmi. So, looks like a winner to me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Serge, if nobody has tried it I can try it out. Jamie, risking going off-topic, how do you compare freeipmi with openipmi? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722770] [NEW] openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openipmi lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 apt-cache policy openipmi openipmi: Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status (mirror.monetra.com is out local ubuntu mirror) In /etc/init.d/openipmi, the path for the lock file is defined as LOCKFILE=/var/lock/subsys/ipmi, which is AFAIK rather redhatian. Also, the directory subsys does not exist in debian/ubuntu. Proposed solution: change path to LOCKFILE=/var/lock/ipmi ** Affects: openipmi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: openipmi lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 apt-cache policy openipmi openipmi: - Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 - Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 - Version table: - *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 - 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 + Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 + Version table: + *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 + 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + + (mirror.monetra.com is out local ubuntu mirror) In /etc/init.d/openipmi, the path for the lock file is defined as LOCKFILE=/var/lock/subsys/ipmi, which is AFAIK rather redhatian. Also, the directory subsys does not exist in debian/ubuntu. Proposed solution: change path to LOCKFILE=/var/lock/ipmi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722770 Title: openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 473332] Re: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module
Serge, if nobody has tried it I can try it out. Jamie, risking going off-topic, how do you compare freeipmi with openipmi? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332 Title: Startup failed to load ipmi_devintf module -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722770] [NEW] openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openipmi lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 apt-cache policy openipmi openipmi: Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status (mirror.monetra.com is out local ubuntu mirror) In /etc/init.d/openipmi, the path for the lock file is defined as LOCKFILE=/var/lock/subsys/ipmi, which is AFAIK rather redhatian. Also, the directory subsys does not exist in debian/ubuntu. Proposed solution: change path to LOCKFILE=/var/lock/ipmi ** Affects: openipmi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: openipmi lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 apt-cache policy openipmi openipmi: - Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 - Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 - Version table: - *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 - 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 + Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 + Version table: + *** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0 + 500 http://mirror.monetra.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + + (mirror.monetra.com is out local ubuntu mirror) In /etc/init.d/openipmi, the path for the lock file is defined as LOCKFILE=/var/lock/subsys/ipmi, which is AFAIK rather redhatian. Also, the directory subsys does not exist in debian/ubuntu. Proposed solution: change path to LOCKFILE=/var/lock/ipmi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722770 Title: openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682415] [NEW] package atftpd failed to properly uninstall: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: atftp I was going to replace atftpd with tftpd-hpa, so I told my machine to remove it (apt-get remove --purge atftpd). When it came time to remove the tftpboot dir, it barked rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/tftpboot': Is a directory Well,we both know that does happen to be a directory. So, my guess is that the remove script forgot the -r option when it was time to remove that directory... or something like that. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: atftpd (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.47-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic x86_64 AptOrdering: atftpd: Purge Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Nov 28 11:47:42 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: atftp Title: package atftpd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: atftp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package atftpd failed to properly uninstall: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682415] Re: package atftpd failed to properly uninstall: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
-- package atftpd failed to properly uninstall: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem
So, if ureadahead is not the guilty party, who is? I have a few 10.04 LTS servers which I have configured with separated /var and they have been working fine so far knock on wood. I have another 10.04 LTS machine in which I created a separate partition for /var but forgot to configure it during install. No problem, I thought, I just had to boot in single user mode (rescue mode in Linux?), edit fstab, move /var to /var.old, and create a new /var. So far I am wrong: if I try to reboot I too get the same error message. So, I deleted the pack files located in /var/lib/ureadahead/, added console output to /etc/init/ureadahead.conf and tried again. This is what I got: udevd-work [298] open /dev/null failed: no such file or directory udevd-work [300] open /dev/null failed: no such file or directory udevd [108] : worker [199] did not accept message -1 (connection refused), kill udevd-work [118]: inotify_add_watch (6, /dev/sda3, 10) failed: no such device or directory init: ureadahead-other main process (309) terminated with status 5 Don't ask me why it can't find /dev/null. It could be completely unrelated to this. FYI, sda3 is the lVM device; inside it is /var. / is sda2 and /boot sda1. Also, after I restarted the machine using the /var that is on the root filesystem, I did get to see the udevd-work [118]: inotify_add_watch (6, /dev/sda3, 10) failed: no such device or directory message during boot time but it did not stop the boot. -- ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543943] Re: Boot failure
I too am experiencing the same problem; here are the first lines in my /var/log/boot.log file: init: mounted-tmp main process (320) terminated with status 127^M mountall: Event failed fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 /dev/sda2: clean, 66135/122160 files, 410049/488192 blocks /dev/sda1: clean, 211/249856 files, 64310/499713 blocks fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 /dev/mapper/asterisk-home: clean, 45/121920 files, 28405/487424 blocks /dev/mapper/asterisk-usr: clean, 51031/610800 files, 243318/2441216 blocks init: ureadahead-other main process (648) terminated with status 4^M init: ureadahead-other main process (683) terminated with status 4^M * Starting AppArmor profiles ^[[80G ^M^[[74G[ OK ] * Setting sensors limits ^[[80G ^M^[[74G[ OK ] And in kernel.log: Nov 3 18:06:38 asterisk kernel: [1.955233] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode Nov 3 18:06:38 asterisk kernel: [1.991874] device-mapper: table: 251:0: linear: Invalid argument count Nov 3 18:06:38 asterisk kernel: [1.991882] device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table Nov 3 18:06:38 asterisk kernel: [2.106555] :03:00.0: eth1: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1) 00:25:90:0a:50:a3 Is this device-mapper error related to this? -- Boot failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663992] [NEW] ubumirror tries to copy the .~tmp~ directories
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubumirror
PROBLEM:
Sometimes the mirror we are syncing from (using ubumirror) is either currently
syncing or has aborted during a sync and not cleaned up the .~tmp~ directories.
As a result, we end up having log messages that look like this:
receiving file list ... rsync: opendir /pool/main/t/telepathy-butterfly/.~tmp~
(in ubuntu) failed: Permission denied (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/t/thunderbird/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permission
denied (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/p/puppet/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permission denie
d (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/p/postgresql-common/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permi
ssion denied (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/p/python-imaging/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permissi
on denied (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/q/quassel/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permission deni
ed (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/s/swt-gtk/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permission deni
ed (13)
rsync: opendir /pool/main/s/splix/.~tmp~ (in ubuntu) failed: Permission denied
(13)
SOLUTION:
One can, in, say, /usr/bin/ubuarchive, either remove the --delay-updates flag,
# rsync -av --timeout=600 --partial --delete --delete-after \
rsync -av --timeout=600 --partial --delete \
or just tell rsync to cheerfully ignore those directories,
rsync -av --timeout=600 --partial --delete --delete-after \
--bwlimit=$SPEED \
--exclude indices/ --exclude dists/ --exclude
project/trace/${HOSTNAME} \
--exclude Archive-Update-in-Progress-${HOSTNAME} \
--exclude .~tmp~/ \
- Add this thingie
$UBUARC_EXCLUDE \
$UBUARC_MIRROR $UBUARC_DIR
which is what ftpsync does.
** Affects: ubumirror (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ubumirror tries to copy the .~tmp~ directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663992
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657007] [NEW] Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/pear/Mail.php
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php-pear When I use version 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.5 of php-pear on a website under ubuntu 10.04 (apache2, php5), I find the following messages in my log file: [Fri Oct 08 12:44:58 2010] [error] [client 192.168.11.154] PHP Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/php/Mail.php on line 154 The same issue happened with Fedora, as shown in http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16969. In that same url, they mentioned this bug has been fixed in SVN on ealry January 2010. ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/pear/Mail.php https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 657007] [NEW] Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/pear/Mail.php
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php-pear When I use version 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.5 of php-pear on a website under ubuntu 10.04 (apache2, php5), I find the following messages in my log file: [Fri Oct 08 12:44:58 2010] [error] [client 192.168.11.154] PHP Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/php/Mail.php on line 154 The same issue happened with Fedora, as shown in http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16969. In that same url, they mentioned this bug has been fixed in SVN on ealry January 2010. ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/share/pear/Mail.php https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 503621] Re: update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:56 AM, CzP 503...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Please https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/623354 for a backport test package, and test it. Currently I only have Maverick installed... It seems to work for me. Very low load so far. Will let it loose for a bit. I had to change the config file a bit but that was to be expected. Thanks! -- update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503621 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “syslog-ng” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “syslog-ng” package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: syslog-ng there are lot of new features in the 3.0/3.1 branches and that branch is much more actively maintained See changelog for 3.0.5: http://www.balabit.com/downchangelog.bbx?cl=/downloads/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslog-ng/+bug/503621/+subscribe -- update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503621] Re: update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1
Is it going to be backported to 10.04 LTS? -- update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503621] Re: update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1
Any chance of this being backported to Lucid? According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/syslog-ng, it comes with 2.0.9 which according to http://www.syslog.org/forum/syslog-ng/syslog- using-99-of-a-cpu/ (a post of mine, if I may say so), it is rather ancient and buggy. -- update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206129] Re: Warning during boot: WARNING: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.24/12-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha-.ko): No such device
I too am experiencing it with a fresh install of 10.04 LTS: modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32-23-server/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device -- Warning during boot: WARNING: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.24/12-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha-.ko): No such device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484231] [NEW] Maximum email size that can be sent through ssmtp should be defined
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ssmtp Would it be possible to add to the documentation the largest email (with its attachment) that can be sent through ssmtp? Is it an absolute or machine-specific? ** Affects: ssmtp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Maximum email size that can be sent through ssmtp should be defined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346513] Re: dbus-daemon: Rejected send message for indicator-applet spams /var/log/auth.log
Will it be backported to Jaunty? -- dbus-daemon: Rejected send message for indicator-applet spams /var/log/auth.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444046] [NEW] rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: request-tracker3.8 OS is the beta version of 9.10. Here is the behaviour I would expect (i.e. it works in 3.6): r...@tickets:~# sudo /usr/sbin/rt-setup-database-3.6 --action init --dba rtuser --dba-password mssw Now creating a database for RT. Creating mysql database rt3. Now populating database schema. Creating database schema. Done setting up database schema. Now inserting database ACLs Done setting up database ACLs. Now inserting RT core system objects Checking for existing system user...not found. This appears to be a new installation. Creating system user...done. Now inserting RT data Creating Superuser ACL...done. Creating groups...3.4.5.6.7.8.9.done. Creating users...10.12.done. Creating queues...1.2.done. Creating ACL...2.3.done. Creating ScripActions...1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.done. Creating ScripConditions...1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.done. Creating templates...1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.done. Creating scrips...1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.done. Creating predefined searches...1.2.3.done. Done setting up database content. r...@tickets:~# And here is how rt-setup-database-3.8 is behaving (and yes, the database was deleted between runs): r...@tickets:~# sudo /usr/sbin/rt-setup-database-3.8 --action init --dba rtuser --dba-password mssw Working with: Type: mysql Host: localhost Name: User: rtuser DBA:rtuser Now creating a mysql database for RT. Couldn't finish 'create' step. ERROR: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1 r...@tickets:~# The database used in both tests was r...@tickets:~# mysql --version mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.37, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using EditLine wrapper r...@tickets:~# And, both versions of request-tracker were as ubuntu packages. ** Affects: request-tracker3.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rt-setup-database-3.8 does not seem to work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
