[Bug 1204579] Re: ufw doesn't support concurrent updates
I have declared also the bug in Ansible collection repo, however this is clearly a UFW bug: https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/issues/4769 ** Bug watch added: github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/issues #4769 https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/issues/4769 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204579 Title: ufw doesn't support concurrent updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1204579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1204579] Re: ufw doesn't support concurrent updates
ufw does not support rule removal. For a particular project (a task queue on a
cloud adhoc HPC cluster), I have had the occasion to test it in a relatively
massive parallel rate (20 concurrent uses). I have experienced:
- nice behaviour when adding rules,
- bad behaviour when removing rules.
I was triggering ufw with ansible parallel playbooks execution.
When removing rules the defect rate was high (as soon as more than two
playbooks were launched together, some of the rules were not deleted).
In that case, ufw fails silently, which is quite bad.
As a counter measure I used task-spooler (apt install task-spooler) I changed
my ansible task from:
```yaml
community.general.ufw:
from_ip: "{{ hostvars[nodename].ipv4 }}"
rule: allow
delete: yes
```
to
```yaml
ansible.builtin.script:
cmd: /usr/bin/tsp /usr/sbin/ufw delete allow from "{{
hostvars[nodename].ipv4 }}"
become: true
```
This solved the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204579
Title:
ufw doesn't support concurrent updates
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1204579/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455786] Re: battery indicator is wrong
I could resolve the bug using combining the trick in bug #270123 and the trick to update a buggy DSDT table in Karmic/Lucid : go to this bug to find out because it's really more a matter of ACPI than something to do with gnome-power-manager. -- battery indicator is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270123] Re: Wrong battery status
Many thanks to Patrick. This solved the problem for me.
In short combine this to create a new DSDT (ref:
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/LaptopTestingTeam/Old/FujitsuEsprimoU9200)
code
sudo apt-get install iasl
cd
mkdir DSDT
cd DSDT
sudo cat /proc/acpi/dsdt dsdt.dat
iasl -d dsdt.dat
gedit dsdt.aml
/code
Ok, now you should have your dsdt file open. So let's fix it, look for
the following code in Device (BAT0), under the Method (UPBS, 0,
NotSerialized) subsection:
code
If (LEqual (Local0, 0x02))
{
And (Local7, One, Local0)
If (LEqual (Local0, One))
{
And (Local7, 0x80, Local1)
If (LEqual (Local1, 0x80))
{
Or (Local4, 0x02, Local4)
}
Else
{
Or (Local4, One, Local4)
}
}
}
/code
Ok, now let's fix it. Else code is misplaced, it has to be moved out of
the If (LEqual (Local0, One)). So, it should be:
code
If (LEqual (Local0, 0x02))
{
And (Local7, One, Local0)
If (LEqual (Local0, One))
{
And (Local7, 0x80, Local1)
If (LEqual (Local1, 0x80))
{
Or (Local4, 0x02, Local4)
}
//ELSE WAS HERE
}
// ELSE CORRECT PLACE
Else
{
Or (Local4, One, Local4)
}
}
/code
Now, simply save and close gedit, and let's continue:
code
cd
cd DSDT
iasl -tc dsdt.dsl
/code
OK now let's insert this in the kernel :
code
mkdir /dsdt
cp dsdt.hex /dest/dsdt_table.h
/code
- stop following what's written in FujitsuEsprimoU9200, the rest won't
work. -
And follow what's here :
http://newyork.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8707937
--
Wrong battery status
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270123
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455786] Re: battery indicator is wrong
same with Lucid -- battery indicator is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455786] Re: battery indicator is wrong
this seems a duplicate of #270123 -- battery indicator is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270123] Re: Wrong battery status
Same pb on my Fujitsu it just occured when I switched from 9.06 to 9.10. -- Wrong battery status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
