Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79418] Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Public bug reported: Install Ubuntu 6.10 and all programming development packages. Type in hello.c from any standard C book. Try to compile it. stdio.h is not found. find command shows that file does not exist. Your forums say to issue a sudo apt-get command. That command does not work and does not find the file. I have a suite of tests for testing Linux distros, and this is the first time any Linux distro has not produced a working C compiler environment. It is a serious bug. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Yes, I found that in the Community Forums and it did work. However, you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. There is nothing in the standard packages that includes build-essential. Try it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile hello.c. You will not be able to. One poster on Community Forums said that Ubuntu should include build-essential with any development packages as a dependency. I can't currently install Ubuntu completely on friends' computers who don't have internet connectivity. I'll have to bring their computers to my house. I'm adding this sudo apt-get to my list of things to do on each computer. Let me say, Ubuntu 6.10 is by far the best Linux distro I've ever seen! It installs smoothly and works great. Excellent job! --- Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not 100% sure but I think > sudo apt-get install build-essential will work. > > see > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=1879291&postcount=4 > > don't worry, ubuntu DOES allow you to compile a > "hello world" in C with > nothing more than installing few packages. > > -- > Standard installation does not produce a working > environment > https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 > The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 79418] Re: Standard installation does not produce a working environment
Excellent link. I'll build a package CD and include it with the standard installation CD. Thanks! (no, build-essential is not on the install CD) Emmanuel Touzery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >you are wrong in your assertion that Ubuntu >allows you to compile hello.c with nothing more than >installing a few packages. There is nothing in the >standard packages that includes build-essential. Try >it: Do a fresh installation on a clean machine and, >without using the sudo apt-get, try to compile >hello.c. You will not be able to. you can compile hello.c with nothing more than installing a few packages. running sudo apt-get IS installing a few packages. if build-essential is not in the ubuntu install CD (is it not?), you could use this trick: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageCDs -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 - TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. -- Standard installation does not produce a working environment https://launchpad.net/bugs/79418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I tried nem75's workaround. But I have another problem. Knetworkmanager does not appear to do ANYTHING AT ALL. Generic GG installation, click on Knetworkmanager from K menu, nothing happens at all. This is very bad. From a user standpoint, you should never have any menu options on a system which do nothing at all. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123696] Re: dependency problem on Kubuntu
I added knetworkmanager as an icon on the desktop. Click it, it does nothing. Right-click Open, it does nothing. -- dependency problem on Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
