[Bug 375485] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 402718 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402718 Hi Andres, Sorry for the delay, I just tested the version from the PPA and it works fine. rg -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375485] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25
Hi Andres, Looks good! I added a http virtual service with an ipv6 address, running in direct routing mode: Load balancer, running karmic: ip addr add 2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a/64 dev eth0 ipvsadm -A -t [2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a]:www -s rr ipvsadm -a -t [2001:770:18:2:0:0:c101:db4a]:www -r [2001:770:18:2:20c:29ff:fe0c:d47e]:www -g -w 1 Real server: ip addr add 2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a/128 dev lo:0 /etc/init.d/apache2 start Client: [...@tachikoma] >> telnet 2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a 80 Trying 2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a... Connected to 2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a. Escape character is '^]'. GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: test.heanet.ie HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:23:25 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) mod_fastcgi/2.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5.5 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Last-Modified: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:52:57 GMT ETag: "e0a2-2d-45d0d4ac19040" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 45 Content-Type: text/html It works! -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375485] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25
Hi Andres, Here is the output when I try to add a service: r...@charlene:/var/tmp# ipvsadm -A -t [2001:770:18:2::c101:db4a]:www -s rr Operation not supported with specified address family Did you build the version of ipvsadm from subversion?: http://svn.linuxvirtualserver.org/repos/ipvsadm/trunk/ rg -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375485] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25
Hi Andres, I've been running it in production on ftp.heanet.ie for the past month or so. It is running on two jaunty boxes, would you like me to test it out on a karmic install? The only major issue we came across involved handling of ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG messages that was causing path-mtu discovery problems for users on IPv6 tunnels. This should be fixed in the latest git kernel however: http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs- devel/2009-06/msg2.html rg -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375485] [NEW] Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ipvsadm Hi, Would it be possible to upgrade the ipvsadm package to 1.25 for karmic ? This version adds IPv6 load balancing support: http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPv6_load_balancing http://svn.linuxvirtualserver.org/repos/ipvsadm/trunk/ IPv6 support is already available in the IPVS module from 2.6.28 onwards, but you need the updated version of ipvsadm to use this functionality. Thanks! rg ** Affects: ipvsadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- Please upgrade ipvsadm to 1.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367455] Re: xfce4-terminal slow after jaunty upgrade
You need to disable compositing due to this bug: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2792 Adding the following to your xorg.conf should do the trick: Section "Extensions" # Workaround for slow xfce-terminal redraw times Option "Composite" "Disable" EndSection ** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #2792 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2792 -- xfce4-terminal slow after jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled
Not present in the stub resolver on jaunty either. I can understand the reluctance to add it in due to potential DNSSEC breakage, but it is a user-configurable option in resolv.conf so it shouldn't be too much of a risk. Could it be added in for jaunty ? -- Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152613] Re: When using dual head with xrandr, fullscreen extends to both screens
Issue confirmed on 8.10 w/ tsclient 0.150-1ubuntu3. -- When using dual head with xrandr, fullscreen extends to both screens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82023] Re: [apport] integrit crashed with SIGSEGV in ??()
Confirmed on 3 separate feisty installs. Please find valgrind debugging session attached. The offending memory location appears to be 0x80480EA, as in the other reports submitted above. ** Attachment added: "integrit-segfault.log.807" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9675667/integrit-segfault.log.807 -- [apport] integrit crashed with SIGSEGV in ??() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
