[Bug 797868] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private()
I just discovered that the error message in question here appeared when I changed the name of a not yet well functioning (the mainboard) ethernet connection, but the message did not appear when I changed the name of the actually well functioning/defined and in use ethernet connection (a PCI adapter ethernet connection). Is that perhaps a significant differentiation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797868 Title: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/797868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 834077] Re: unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-9-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 30 15:03:37 UTC 2011 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux The above info shows that despite my PC having an AMD64 cpu I opted to this time use the 32 bit version of the live DVD iso (well, I burned it onto a DVD at least, should the iso be in fact the one that fits onto a CD as well - I'm not sure which one I've got running here). I figure I'll try using the 64 bit iso version next to see if the same crash then occurs. My actions leading up to the crash...: booted the PC with the live-DVD as shown above in place within the DVD drive. While busy defining the eth0 wired network connection (it was not as yet properly defined) an already known crash occurred in the 2D unity gui. I delayed clicking on the report error button of the crash message window until I had gotten the network up and running for internet access. I then clicked on that button with the result that Firefox was launched so as to access Launchpad. Meanwhile I had opened (with LibreOffice's swriter) an odt file. During my Launchpad usage the crash involving LibreOffice occurred. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834077 Title: unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/834077/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656180] Re: ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in module() upon Live CD start with as yet no INet access available
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180/+attachment/1676537/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180/+attachment/1676538/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180/+attachment/1676539/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180/+attachment/1676540/+files/Traceback.txt ** Attachment added: UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180/+attachment/1676541/+files/UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in module() upon Live CD start with as yet no INet access available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354410] Re: gnome-app-install crashed with ValueError in _refilter()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 339148 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339148 btw for what it's worth, immediately after the crash midori did get successfully installed and started. The add / remove menu feature, itself, did not crash during it all. -- gnome-app-install crashed with ValueError in _refilter() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:
Python3 installed under jaunty for me just now without a hitch. So at least if the upgrade from Intrepid to Jaunty has been completed then Python3 is available / installable thereafter under jaunty. As I recall, my upgrade from intrepid to jaunty also entailed problems with the installation of python 2.6 being in conflict with the then standard use of python 2.5. That problem got corrected in the course of jaunty being upgraded daily (my common practice). -- package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197559] Re: deskbar-applet crashed with ImportError in module()
Hopefully the automatically attached info will this time around provide useful info. All I know is that I had only just booted the PC when this and (so far) four other error reports popped up in rapid succession. -- deskbar-applet crashed with ImportError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347429] [NEW] paragraph marks; finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org paragraph marks;finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks ---instead of displaying help text relevant to finding and replacing paragraph marks. I do believe that the help function of previous OOo versions did, however, function as expected. Apparently the help text for the newer OOo version and/or the links used within the index for that text have come to be out of sync. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-7ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- paragraph marks;finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347429] Re: paragraph marks; finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks
** Attachment added: Bildschirmfoto-OpenOffice.org Help - OpenOffice.org Writer.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24280898/Bildschirmfoto-OpenOffice.org%20Help%20-%20OpenOffice.org%20Writer.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24280899/Dependencies.txt -- paragraph marks;finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347429] Re: paragraph marks; finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks
btw - I am as yet listed as not being an ubuntero. I do, nevertheless, fully agree with and try always to comply with the ubunto code of conduct, only I have not yet come to grips with and thus have yet to use the GPG etc.. I am looking into it by and by. Perhaps I will become an ubuntero as a result sometime soon. ;) -- paragraph marks;finding replacing displays Removing Line Breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344179] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with SystemError in OPEN
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 261523 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261523 [quote] File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/apt/cache.py, line 75, in open self._cache = apt_pkg.GetCache(progress) SystemError: E:read, still have 7538982 to read but none left, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.[/quote] Btw that gnome desktop unresponsiveness led me to abruptly (reset button evtly used) interrupt a synaptic based removal of citadel. Perhaps the lists or status file were therefore yet left in an incomplete status? (P.S. due to its private status - I presume - I am currently not authorised to access that other bug, of which this one be said to be a duplicate. I therefore add this comment here instead of there.) -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with SystemError in OPEN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335567] Re: jockey-backend crashed with IOError: [Errno 19] No such device
I, too, had just activated the Nvidia 96.43.10 driver in anticipation of starting Baldur's Gate under PlayOnLinux. I think though that the error message first came after I mistakenly tried to start the game via clicking on the starter icon while yet having forgotten to first insert the Baldur's Gate DVD into the DVD drive. I thus got the impression that the DVD not being in the drive had caused or provoked the error message. Btw I had only just dist-upgraded beforehand. Thus this occurred under the ubuntu Linux on x86/x86_64, linux-image-2.6.28-9.29-generic. Maybe I should have restarted ubuntu after activating the Nvidia driver before trying to start the game. -- jockey-backend crashed with IOError: [Errno 19] No such device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121341] Re: python modules need to work during dist-upgrades
** Also affects: nevow (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- python modules need to work during dist-upgrades https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121341] Re: python modules need to work during dist-upgrades
Please notice the mention of nevow (and of twitsted) within the following quote of status/error messages sent during a recent re-try at installing python2.6 undertaken after a dist-upgrade for ubuntu9.04 jaunty jackolope failed, which I at first (I know assume, mistakenly) thought to have been caused by faulty coding within the python2.6 package. [quote] Richte python2.6-minimal ein (2.6.1-0ubuntu8) ... Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python2.6... /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/web/microdom.py:181: SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses? assert (oldChild.parentNode is self, /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/lib/tests/test_io.py:68: SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses? assert(c.readlines(), Compiling /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/nevow/context.py ... SyntaxError: ('invalid syntax', ('/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/nevow/context.py', 37, 12, 'def with(self, tag):\n')) [/quote] Having in the meanwhile noticed several mentions upstream of nevow causing trouble for upgrades due to a self-reference within its installation procedures, whereby building the nevow software required access to its already built self in order to get itself built. (see for example http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/455 http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue20 http://divmod.org/trac/ticket/2699 http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/530 http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue57) The nevow build process includes a self-reference; the code being carried out to build python2.6 contains a tautology. Might not that be the actual cause of the self-reference and thus of the build problems not only of nevow itself but also of the packages such as python2.6 dependent upon it for their own build? _ I see no way to attach text files to this report at the moment, so I will include here inline the following four textual records of the messages displayed pertinent to my attempts to finally complete the dist-upgrade without leaving out any but the python2.6 packages. That effort eventually seemed to me to succeed, which initially got me believing that the python2.6 package had caused the problems. But that was before I caught onto the nevow problems upstream. it now seems obvious to me that possibly not python2.6 itself be at fault but, of course, twisted and / or nevow, be the troublemakers. At any rate, neither the python2.6 package itself nor that software, as such, need be at fault, were the installation software, itself, to be the culprit here. [Begin of the four inline textual inclusions] ___ Di Feb 24 11:15:43 CET 2009 /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb konnte nicht installiert werden Die Aktualisierung wird fortgesetzt, aber das '/var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb' Paket ist möglicherweise nicht funktionsfähig. Bitte erwägen Sie, einen Fehlerbericht darüber einzusenden. Unterprozess neues pre-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück ___ Di Feb 24 11:23:52 CET 2009 Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: rhythmbox 1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 5 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen noch 0B von 3402kB an Archiven heruntergeladen werden. Nach dieser Operation werden 20,5kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]? J (Lese Datenbank ... 173423 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von rhythmbox 0.11.6svn20090108-0ubuntu1 (durch .../rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Warnung - altes pre-removal-Skript wurde mit Fehler-Status 1 beendet dpkg - probiere stattdessen Skript aus dem neuen Paket ... Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess neues pre-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Fehler beim Aufräumen: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) _ Di Feb 24 23:19:13 CET 2009 romat...@rdmrmpc:~$ sudo apt-get remove python2.6 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig Die folgenden Pakete wurden automatisch installiert und werden nicht länger benötigt: python2.6-minimal libgpod3 Verwenden Sie »apt-get autoremove«,
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
** Attachment added: rythmbox_upgrade_error http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23195917/rythmbox_upgrade_error -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
** Attachment added: python2.6_removed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23195930/python2.6_removed -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
I eventually succeeded in remonving python2.6. I then found it necessary to also remove gdm-new in order to get ubuntu9.04 working normally again, since gdm-new appeared to require python2.6 in order to function. (At any rate, installing gdm-new had resulted in also installing python2.6. ) ** Attachment added: success at removing python2.6 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23196025/python2.6_removal -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
I suspect that the older error report referred to here below concern essentially the same problem touched upon here. My attempts there to get that considered a duplicate of this error report and thus also reopened I appear to have botched. see...: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.6/+bug/121341 Please excuse my ineptness. I hope to eventually get more adept at making such reports so as to be more of a help than of a pain for you developers. ;/ -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
** Also affects: rhythmbox Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: apparently, the several python versions concurrently installed are getting in each others way now that python 2.6 got installed. That led to a failure during the dist-upgrade
(s.attachment) even today, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009, having updated the .deb package of my PC I receive the same warning about python2.6 as shown in the attachment, namely, that a tautology be present within the code of the python2.6 package. I therefore removed python2.6 as well as python-all in order to keep my PC running well. gdm-new, which I had intended to try using I had already removed due to its installation including the defective python2.6. Might someone from python-support be able to correct that pyhton2.6 code? ** Attachment added: python2.6 appears to contain grammatically incorrect code http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23146658/python2.6_errors -- apparently, the several python versions concurrently installed are getting in each others way now that python 2.6 got installed. That led to a failure during the dist-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
** Summary changed: - apparently, the several python versions concurrently installed are getting in each others way now that python 2.6 got installed. That led to a failure during the dist-upgrade + ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] Re: ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code
Sorry. I only just came to realise, that eventually the specific repository that I used to update my PCs .deb files might be the only repository to have a python2.6 package containing faulty code. I was using ftp:://ftp.fu-berlin.de/linux/ubuntu in particular I suspect that the python2.6 package have been downloaded from out of http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop/ppa/ubuntu there. -- ubuntu jaunty repositories contain faulty python 2.6 code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333798] [NEW] apparently, the several python versions concurrently installed are getting in each others way now that python 2.6 got installed. That led to a failure during the dist-upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-support Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: rhythmbox 1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 5 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen noch 0B von 3402kB an Archiven heruntergeladen werden. Nach dieser Operation werden 20,5kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]? J (Lese Datenbank ... 173423 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von rhythmbox 0.11.6svn20090108-0ubuntu1 (durch .../rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Warnung - altes pre-removal-Skript wurde mit Fehler-Status 1 beendet dpkg - probiere stattdessen Skript aus dem neuen Paket ... Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): Unterprozess neues pre-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Package python2.6 is trying to overwrite gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so which is already provided by python-gobject-dbg dpkg: Fehler beim Aufräumen: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox_0.11.6svn20090209-0ubuntu1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Affects: python-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- apparently, the several python versions concurrently installed are getting in each others way now that python 2.6 got installed. That led to a failure during the dist-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256515] Re: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
allow me to suggest that in my case (same error alarm had, namely evolution-alarm-notify crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()) I had not even started evolution nor was I in the process at the time the error alarm sounded of updating anything. That, of course, made me curious as to how evolution came to be at all active, let alone produce an error alarm. I discovered that I have had checked as active the automatic alerting to personal calendar events and/or birthdays recorded within evolution's calendar. I have, however, never made any entries within the calendar. Since a strlen() error is mentioned, might not the problem be precisely the above situation ... i.e. strlen() = zero or perhaps null?? I had during my search at first intended to deactivate whatever automatic functions might have produced the error. I reinstated those two processes, however, in order to await the same error eventually occurring again. If so I hope to thus have confirmed my suspicion for you. -- evolution-alarm-notify crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301597] [NEW] package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minima
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python3.0 lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 Info to ubuntu Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an Ubuntu 8.10, dem Intrepid Ibex (»unerschrockener Steinbock«) — veröffentlicht im Oktober 2008. (??? is it normal for Intrepid Ibex to be indicated here, though I upgraded to jaunty?) apt-cache policy python python: Installiert: 2.5.2-3ubuntu1 Kandidat: 2.5.2-3ubuntu1 Versions-Tabelle: *** 2.5.2-3ubuntu1 0 500 ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status When I started the update-manager this morning expecting to carry out my habitual daily upgrade of the OS, an error message appeared stating that the packages cache be damaged. I therefore ended the update-manager and opened a terminal from which per sudo to use apt-get to check, update and then upgrade everything. the message pertaining to python3.0 3.0-rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 then appeared ...: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist My assumption: the cache got somehow damaged independently of any correlation to the specific package that as a result could not get updated/installed, in this case python(...). I am guessing that I need to use dpkg somehow to re-create the cache as a whole or something, but just in case I be in error I am sending this python related error message along. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: Versuche, »/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist Package: python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: python3.0 Title: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist Uname: Linux 2.6.27-8-generic i686 ** Affects: python3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301597] Re: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19898529/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19898530/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301597] Re: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal
After trying...: sudo dpkg --configure -a sudo apt-get update I then tried...: sudo apt-get upgrade ...which resulted in the following messages...: Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig Probieren Sie »apt-get -f install«, um diese zu korrigieren. Die folgenden Pakete haben nicht erfüllte Abhängigkeiten: python3.0: Hängt ab: python3.0-minimal (= 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1) aber 3.0~rc3-0ubuntu3 ist installiert E: Nicht erfüllte Abhängigkeiten. Versuchen Sie, -f zu benutzen. Do I guess right that the intrepid version be being somehow considered the proper current version with the result that the jaunty version be considered uninstallable? -- package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301597] Re: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal
Please note that I am using the OpenOffice.org Version 3 under jaunty, which I download and install however from out of the intrepid repository...: http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ubuntu intrepid main Does that somehow cause a mix-up resulting in the above problem? -- package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301597] Re: package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal
OK... after the above measures were taken, I was able to use synaptic to install the python3 package...: python3.0 (Version 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1) wird auf die Version 3.0~rc3-0ubuntu3 aktualisiert and in the aftermath to then install first one then the newest mono packages. Apparently, everything (?) is now okay, at least as far as synaptic be concerned. Unless there be other matters involved here of which I am not aware, please therefore consider this case to have become solved. Sorry to have troubled you. -- package python3.0 3.0~rc1+20081027-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, ?/usr/lib/python3.0/lib-dynload/_pickle.so? zu ?berschreiben, welches auch in Paket python3.0-minimal ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61340] Re: Alacarte emptied my Applications menu list.
ok, I can confirm that my own ~/.config/menus/applications.menu existing but being currently empty indeed leads to alacarte terminating. I wish to report a possible cause though for the emptiness. Topic: system defaults changed via the context menu of the nautilus file manager. Namely, I discovered that in the aftermath of my installing 7z (the windows version of which I had become especially enamored of during my days as Win98SE user) apparently inadvertently (?) the system default for the procedure with which normally directories were to be opened was changed from open ordner to 7z. (Similarly, I discovered the normal way to handle profiles and other simple text files had inadvertently become changed across the board from using a simple text editor to using swriter of the OpenOffice.org office software. ) As an Ubuntu8.10 user, I have routinely had admin rights. Sudo has been ever again necessary to perform some actions. Not so within nautilus' context menu. Why do I mention this within this context? Well, not only was that applications menu empty, but the Places links within the main menu (personal directory, Desktop etc) were for some time dysfunctional at my PC. After I discovered that bit about 7z and had changed the normal usage in opening directories back to open directory, then suddenly, those Places links immediately worked normally again. Might not the malfunctioning of the opening of directories during the time when 7z was unhappily as the system wide norm associated with opening directories have been the cause (or part of it) of the above- described emptying of the applications menu? For if alacarte tries to open the directory with some normal editor with its own success / failure flagging and instead that attempt results in 7z getting called, wouldn't that be a problem for alacarte? My vote: alacarte should be augmented with some normal non disastrous reaction to such a mishap. Also 2x Questions: (1) I think that the system defaults should not be always and for all time changed for all like type files when I use the opening with option of the context menu within nautilus to choose a application with which to open some file, but only when that be explicitly desired by the user ie admin. Should I or someone suggest such a change to the nautilus software? (2) Am I wrong to under Ubuntu be running around all the time as an admin group member? (sorry, I'm a former Win98SE user and noob at Ubuntu) ** Attachment added: Bildschirmfoto-Oeffnen mit.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18007220/Bildschirmfoto-Oeffnen%20mit.png -- Alacarte emptied my Applications menu list. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 273500] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_paint_box()
Hi 8/ sorry, but so far in the aftermath of the updates/upgrades that have since taken place I have yet to experience such a crash again. On the other hand, the failure to respond to a left-click of the personal folder and -sub-folder icons within the Places (german : ) remains in effect. mfg Robert D. Martin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:33:12 + Subject: [Bug 273500] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_paint_box() Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17870363/CoreDump.gz ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: New = Incomplete -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_paint_box() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273500 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “nautilus” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Binary package hint: nautilus #208144 reports that nautilus crashed upon system start. Also in my case it was just after starting the OS when I did attempt to open a nautilus window upon my home directory that this crash occured and the apport report got automatically initiated. I then noted that repeated attempts to open a nautilus window anywhere else also failed. Success at opening a nautilus window I first had again by way of right-clicking upon the trashcan symbol and choosing to open that display. -- is this case then a duplicate of 208144? (please note, since that occured I spent some time checking to see whether such crashing be a duplicate of previously reported crashes. In order better to report in about crashes in the future I therefore added ddeb to the third party software sources. That then led to an upgrade at this PC from 2.23. to 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 etc. this time including the ddeb sources. The OS is now supposed to be restarted, so I will be using the newer version thereafter.) current values are now therefore (other than at the moment of the crash) apt-cache policy nautilus nautilus: Installiert: 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu1 Kandidat: 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu1 Versions-Tabelle: *** 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release: 8.10 ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.23.92-0ubuntu1 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdline: nautilus --no-desktop --browser ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libmurrine.so ?? () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libmurrine.so IA__gtk_paint_box (style=0xbfbfcb40, window=0x9ec5aa8, _gtk_button_paint (button=0x9ebfa68, area=0x9e8c604, gtk_toggle_button_expose (widget=0x9ebfa68, event=0x9e8c5f8) Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_paint_box() Uname: Linux 2.6.27-3-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video _ Neu: Office Live Workspace, der kostenlose Online-Arbeitsbereich für Office. Ideal auch für Teams. Jetzt ausprobieren! http://workspace.officelive.com/?lc=1031cloc=de-DE -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_paint_box() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs