[Bug 880872] [NEW] [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity When the gtk theme used is not Ambiance/Radiance Ubiquity draws part of the installer as pink blocks. I've been looking into it and I found that it is cause of the explicit use in code of css colors [1] which are defined in Ambiance/Radiance themes but they are not in other gtk themes like Adwaita. The exactly colors that are used are dark_fg_color and dark_bg_color. They are used to tint some parts of the UI. I do attach a patch for Ubiquity (trunk) to check wether the [dark] colors are defined in the gtk theme or not and to use them or not consequently. [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/ubiquity/frontend/gtk_ui.py#L750 ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oneiric precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880872 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880872] Re: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas
** Patch added: adds support to check wether the [dark] colors are defined in the gtk theme or not and use them or not consequently. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880872/+attachment/2569839/+files/gtk_ui_css_fix.patch ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity When the gtk theme used is not Ambiance/Radiance Ubiquity draws part of the installer as pink blocks. - I've been looking into it and I found that it is cause of the explicit use in code of css colors [1] which are defined in - Ambiance/Radiance themes but they are not in other gtk themes like Adwaita. + I've been looking into it and I found that it is cause of the explicit use in code of css colors [1] which are defined in Ambiance/Radiance themes but they are not in other gtk themes like Adwaita. The exactly colors that are used are dark_fg_color and dark_bg_color. They are used to tint some parts of the UI. I do attach a patch for Ubiquity (trunk) to check wether the [dark] colors are defined in the gtk theme or not and to use them or not consequently. [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/ubiquity/frontend/gtk_ui.py#L750 ** Patch removed: adds support to check wether the [dark] colors are defined in the gtk theme or not and use them or not consequently. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+attachment/2569839/+files/gtk_ui_css_fix.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880872 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880872] Re: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880872 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880872] Re: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas
Finally, the correct patch. ** Patch added: Adds support to check wether the [dark] colors are defined in the gtk theme or not and to use them or not consequently. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+attachment/2569854/+files/gtk_ui_css_fix.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880872 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity shows pink areas To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/880872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877187] [NEW] [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: wget
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I'm building an Ubuntu derivated live system and I found that Ubiquity is missing wget as depend. It is used in the base frontend (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/ubiquity/frontend/base.py line 450) and if wget is not installed Ubiquity crashes. By the way, I realized that wget is in debian/control as build-dep, maybe it was a typo :] ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oneiric precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877187 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: wget To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/877187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877223] [NEW] [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: python-gobject-cairo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I'm building an Ubuntu derivated live system and I found that Ubiquity is missing python-gobject-cairo as depend. The lack of this module (and therefore, of introspection) will cause errors like this one: TypeError: Couldn't find conversion for foreign struct 'cairo.Context' ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oneiric precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877223 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: python-gobject-cairo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/877223/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877230] [NEW] [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: grub-common
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I'm building an Ubuntu derivated live system and I found that Ubiquity is missing grub-common as depend. 'grub-mkdevicemap', which belongs to grub-common, is used as a misc resource (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/ubiquity/misc.py line 302) and if it is not found Ubiquity crashes. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oneiric precise ** Tags added: oneiric precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877230 Title: [oneiric] [precise] ubiquity missing depend: grub-common To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/877230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364663] Re: rarian-compat should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0
I just checked and It seems it's fixed already :] Thanks for your attention. ** Changed in: guadalinex Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364663 Title: rarian-compat should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121815] Re: r8169 stops working after a while
Still broken on 2.6.35-22-generic under Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121815 Title: r8169 stops working after a while -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555815] [NEW] [lucid] openoffice.org-common conflicts with the openoffice.org-writer2latex in repositories
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 Package version: 1:3.2.0-4ubuntu2 0 apt output: openoffice.org-common: Conflicts: openoffice.org-writer2latex ( 1.0-5) but 0.5.0.2-4ubuntu1 is to be installed It seems that openoffice.org-writer2latex package in Lucid repositories is too old and conflicts openoffice.org-common. Debian [1] has newer writer2latex versions packaged already that would solve the conflict. I think it should be imported to make the repository consistent. [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=allsearchon=nameskeywords=writer2latex ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: lucid writer2latex -- [lucid] openoffice.org-common conflicts with the openoffice.org-writer2latex in repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555815] Re: [lucid] openoffice.org-common conflicts with the openoffice.org-writer2latex in repositories
Right, new version was included after I checked (before 31st March), it's just I didn't recheck before filling this bug. Thanks and sorry :] -- [lucid] openoffice.org-common conflicts with the openoffice.org-writer2latex in repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363871] Re: Disabling user switching doesn't disable it completely
I can confirm that it doesn't works in 9.10 either... Menu options are displayed in FUSA (in 9.10 indicator-session) applet and in the gnome-panel built-in applet logout. They do not only are shown in the applets, they will let you switch user having set /desktop/gnome/lockdown/disable_user_switching to True. I have been looking into indicator-session's code and it directly spawns a new session without checking any config (gconf). I have tried to disallow normal users via policykit to access org.gnome.displaymanager.localdisplayfactory dbus resource, since, I've seen that, that's what indicator-session calls to instace a new sessión, but I haven't been able to do it, I don't know if it has been because of my ignorance or because some problem related with the transition from policykit to policykit-1 (the resource wasn't defined in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/gdm.policy)... Im reviewing gnome-panel's code right now, I need those options disabled in the distro I'm developing (Guadalinex Guadalinfo V6). -- Disabling user switching doesn't disable it completely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
Done: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586196 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586196 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586196 -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383892] [NEW] Guest user can not execute files from its home
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm-guest-session Due to the apparmor profile loaded, when you use the guest session in an installed system (in live systems apparmor is disabled), you can not execute anything from your $HOME. One of the consecuences that made me realize about this issue is that .desktops located in your $HOME will not be executed/rendered (no icon is showed), since they are not trusted by default. They even do not get trusted for some reason when you double-click them and you are answered what to do with it (Execute/Trust/Cancel) , but that's another issue I'd have to research... This happens because of the new behaviour of nautilus in response of the virus menace [1] As solution, we can change the flags of the apparmor profile allowing user to exec files in /tmp/**. I attach a patch for it. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel- l...@gnome.org/msg15426.html ** Affects: gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: guadalinex Importance: Low Status: New ** Tags: guest intrepid jaunty karmic -- Guest user can not execute files from its home https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383892] Re: Guest user can not execute files from its home
** Attachment added: gdm-guest-session http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27521807/gdm-guest-session ** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = final -- Guest user can not execute files from its home https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383892] Re: Guest user can not execute files from its home
Added debdiff for development package (karmic). ** Attachment added: gdm-guest-session_0.10.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27523191/gdm-guest-session_0.10.debdiff -- Guest user can not execute files from its home https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] [NEW] Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero When burning Video Projects brasero hangs in the process of converting files. Sometimes the progress bar just stops and the app hangs forever and sometimes it starts to increase the estimated time up to infinite. I have tried to convert these two different XviD files to SVCD/VCD: * 700mb file: AVI, 640 x 272, 25.00 fps, video: XviD, audio: MPEG-1 Layer 3 (stereo, 48000 Hz) * 12mb file: AVI, 720 x 576, 25.00 fps, video: XviD, audio: uncompressed PCM (stereo, 48000 Hz) I only had success with the small one using VCD as output, but randomly, it failed aswell... I have tried to convert very different files with sucess: * The SAME 12mb file converted (via ffmpeg) to DivX4 and FFmpeg DivX * 16mb file: MPEG sequence, v1, system multiplex * 41mb file: Ogg data, Skeleton v3.0 * 25mb file: Ogg data, Theora video I have attached 4 brasero debug log files (brasero -g) for the 4 different failed (well, 1 one of them is the success log for the small XviD file which sometimes works) tests I've done. ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: guadalinex Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: guadalinex Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = final -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
** Attachment added: FAILED-700mb-file-xvid-to-svcd-brasero-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27493066/FAILED-700mb-file-xvid-to-svcd-brasero-debug.log -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
** Attachment added: SUCCESSFUL-12mb-file-xvid-to-vcd-brasero-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27493586/SUCCESSFUL-12mb-file-xvid-to-vcd-brasero-debug.log -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
** Attachment added: FAILED-12mb-file-xvid-to-svcd-brasero-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27493635/FAILED-12mb-file-xvid-to-svcd-brasero-debug.log ** Tags added: jaunty -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
** Attachment added: FAILED-700mb-file-xvid-to-vcd-brasero-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27493609/FAILED-700mb-file-xvid-to-vcd-brasero-debug.log -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383616] [NEW] Add-in Manager untranslated/misterious strings
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot 0.5.0.3-1ubuntu6 (jaunty) I'm part of the Guadalinex distro developers team and one of our prior tasks is to make a full Spanish distro. In the task of getting 'f-spot' fully translated, I have found a really weird case that I haven't been able to resolve... The matter is that there are some strings in the 'Preferences/Manage Extensions' which remain untranslated. We can find, for example: * Add-in Manager * The following add-ins are currently installed: * etc... I check that the 'f-spot' translations are managed directly from package source, it's not included in any langpack, so I went to look into f-spot code/.pot/.po. I started looking for those strings I mentioned, but I could'nt find them nor in the code neither in the .po files... I realized that those strings were correctly translated in .po files, matching correct source strings, but they were not being displayed translated. I checked that Add-ins Manager is now substituted by Extensions Manager mostly everywhere in code and that made me wonder if strings in code (in English) were being showed in GUI as they were in code... And they weren't!! I'll illustrate it with some examples: * es.po #: ../mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk-gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinInstallerDialog.cs:36 #: ../mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk-gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinManagerDialog.cs:58 msgid Extension Manager msgstr Gestor de extensiones * mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk- gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinInstallerDialog.cs:36 this.Title = Mono.Unix.Catalog.GetString(Extension Manager); * String showed in GUI when launching f-spot (even launching it in English) Add-ins Manager It is a really weird case... At least until I knew where those strings are coming from :] ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: guadalinex Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Tags: jaunty ** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: guadalinex Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = final ** Tags added: jaunty ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: f-spot + Binary package hint: f-spot 0.5.0.3-1ubuntu6 (jaunty) I'm part of the Guadalinex distro developers team and one of our prior tasks is to make a full Spanish distro. In the task of getting 'f-spot' fully translated, I have found a really weird case that I haven't been able to resolve... The matter is that there are some strings in the 'Preferences/Manage Extensions' which remain untranslated. We can find, for example: * Add-in Manager * The following add-ins are currently installed: * etc... I check that the 'f-spot' translations are managed directly from package source, it's not included in any langpack, so I went to look into f-spot code/.pot/.po. I started looking for those strings I mentioned, but I could'nt find them nor in the code neither in the .po files... I realized that those strings were correctly translated in .po files, matching correct source strings, but they were not being displayed translated. I checked that Add-ins Manager is now substituted by Extensions Manager mostly everywhere in code and that made me wonder if strings in code (in English) were being showed in GUI as they were in code... And they weren't!! I'll illustrate it with some examples: * es.po #: ../mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk-gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinInstallerDialog.cs:36 #: ../mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk-gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinManagerDialog.cs:58 msgid Extension Manager msgstr Gestor de extensiones * mono-addins/Mono.Addins.Gui/gtk- gui/Mono.Addins.Gui.AddinInstallerDialog.cs:36 this.Title = Mono.Unix.Catalog.GetString(Extension Manager); * String showed in GUI when launching f-spot (even launching it in English) Add-ins Manager It is a really weird case... At least until I knew where those strings are coming from :] -- Add-in Manager untranslated/misterious strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383556] Re: Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: brasero + Binary package hint: brasero 2.26.0-0ubuntu3 (jaunty) When burning Video Projects brasero hangs in the process of converting files. Sometimes the progress bar just stops and the app hangs forever and sometimes it starts to increase the estimated time up to infinite. I have tried to convert these two different XviD files to SVCD/VCD: * 700mb file: AVI, 640 x 272, 25.00 fps, video: XviD, audio: MPEG-1 Layer 3 (stereo, 48000 Hz) * 12mb file: AVI, 720 x 576, 25.00 fps, video: XviD, audio: uncompressed PCM (stereo, 48000 Hz) I only had success with the small one using VCD as output, but randomly, it failed aswell... I have tried to convert very different files with sucess: * The SAME 12mb file converted (via ffmpeg) to DivX4 and FFmpeg DivX * 16mb file: MPEG sequence, v1, system multiplex * 41mb file: Ogg data, Skeleton v3.0 * 25mb file: Ogg data, Theora video I have attached 4 brasero debug log files (brasero -g) for the 4 different failed (well, 1 one of them is the success log for the small XviD file which sometimes works) tests I've done. -- Brasero hangs forever while converting xvid video files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364009] Re: ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option
Sorry, it seems I was a bit high that day hehe I include a new not-reversed patch using just 1 awk instance and using debconf-style :] Personally, I don't like the debconf-style options in cmdline because it makes it too large (and it has its limit), but I understand (and I suppose) that these options can/will be included and used directly to/from debconf so it's sounds nice to me. Thanks for your attention. ** Attachment added: init.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25879506/init.patch -- ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364009] Re: ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option
** Attachment removed: init.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25879506/init.patch ** Attachment added: init.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25880004/init.patch -- ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364568] [NEW] Invalid depend: sun-java6-jre-headless
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ca-certificates-java Package: ca-certificates-java Version: 20081028 Hello, In fact, this a bug re-report, since I have seen that there was already a bug mentioned in mail lists, but I haven't been able to find it in launchpad. I literally write here the old description from this mail [1]: ca-certificates-java has an alternate depend on sun-java6-jre-headless. However, this package does not exist. There's no headless version of the non-free Sun JRE package. ca-certificates-java should depend on sun-java6-jre instead of sun-java6-jre-headless. I'm working on Guadalinex (Ubuntu derivated distro) and we are using sun-java6, and we get installed openjdk* because of this issue. Cheers :] [1] https://lists.launchpad.net/openjdk/msg01487.html ** Affects: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: guadalinex Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: guadalinex Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = beta -- Invalid depend: sun-java6-jre-headless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364663] [NEW] rarian-compat should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0
Public bug reported: Hello, Im having problems with rarian-compat, which conflicts and replaces 'scrollkeeper' package and leaves 'libscrollkeeper0' orphan because it is installed by scrollkeeper and not uninstalled when rarian is and I think it should since it is useless and funcionally replaced by rarian. ** Affects: rarian (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: guadalinex Importance: Medium Status: New ** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = beta ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: High = Medium ** Summary changed: - rarian should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0 + rarian-compat should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0 -- rarian-compat should conflict/replace libscrollkeeper0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364009] [NEW] ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Hello, I'm working on Guadalinex a derivated Ubuntu distro, and we have been in the need to override the ubiquity frontend used when the 'only-ubiquity' is used as kernel option. By default, it uses gtk_ui, but we use a customized one, so I have added support to '/etc/init.d/ubiquity' to parse a 'ubiquity-ui=frontend' option and set it as the frontend used. If no 'ubiquity-ui' option is specified, the default one is used. I attach a patch for this file. Hope it (at least the idea itself :) can be included in further versions of ubiquity, since I think is a good idea for derivatives :] ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364009] Re: ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option
** Also affects: guadalinex Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: guadalinex Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: guadalinex Milestone: None = beta -- ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364009] Re: ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option
** Attachment added: init.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25779606/init.patch -- ubiquity support to override default frontend via kernel option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347790] [NEW] Splash image not shown when using device UUID as root
Public bug reported: I have checked that grub is not showing the splash image when an UUID root is used, which seems the default way 'update-grub' configures 'splashimage' variable in /boot/grub/menu.lst. An example of a non-working 'splashimage': splashimage=6f421c1a-1903-4f7e-991a-3667a1299609/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz Although, using old root notation works. In my case: splashimage=(hd0,4)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz I have tried using the UUID in 'groot' variable (which is filled right but commented by default) and letting 'splashimage' just containing the image path and it works aswell. We are using near the latest version of grub from jaunty: * grub 0.97-29ubuntu50 * grub-common 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 ** Affects: grub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: grub (Guadalinex) Importance: High Assignee: Roberto C. Morano (rcmorano) Status: New ** Tags: grub guadalinex jaunty splash splashimage ** Also affects: grub (Guadalinex) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: I have checked that grub is not showing the splash image when an UUID root is used, which seems the default way 'update-grub' configures 'splashimage' variable in /boot/grub/menu.lst. An example of a non-working 'splashimage': splashimage=6f421c1a-1903-4f7e-991a-3667a1299609/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz Although, using old root notation works. In my case: splashimage=(hd0,4)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz I have tried using the UUID in 'groot' variable (which is filled right but commented by default) and letting 'splashimage' just containing the image path and it works aswell. + + We are using near the latest version of grub from jaunty: + + * grub 0.97-29ubuntu50 + * grub-common 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 ** Tags added: grub guadalinex jaunty splash splashimage ** Changed in: grub (Guadalinex) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: grub (Guadalinex) Assignee: (unassigned) = Roberto C. Morano (rcmorano) -- Splash image not shown when using device UUID as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341699] Re: .desktop doesn't launch because 'su-to-root' is missing
** Attachment added: control.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23779107/control.patch ** Tags added: guadalinex jaunty ** Also affects: firestarter (Guadalinex) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firestarter (Guadalinex) Status: New = In Progress -- .desktop doesn't launch because 'su-to-root' is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341699] [NEW] .desktop doesn't launch because 'su-to-root' is missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firestarter We are including 'firestarter' package in Guadalinex and we have detected that the actual .desktop is using 'su-to-root' tool to gain root privileges. This tool is provided by the package menu which is not listed as 'firestarter' dependence as it should. It was obviously not working for us since no other package had installed it letting us to catch the bug :] I have checked that the same package in hardy wasnt using 'su-to-root' but it had many _other_ dependences which are not listed on jaunty version anymore, so maybe there are other missing aswell. I haven't tested firestarter deeply yet, so I just can say it gets launched in our environment. I attach a patch for debian/control Regards. ** Affects: firestarter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: firestarter (Guadalinex) Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Tags: guadalinex jaunty -- .desktop doesn't launch because 'su-to-root' is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310804] Re: Missing strings for translation
Hi, I still can not see more than 20 strings for translation in Rosetta although there are much more (near double) in the .pot template from trunk [1]. Please check it out. Thanks [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-installer/usb- creator/trunk/annotate/head%3A/po/usbcreator.pot -- Missing strings for translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
