[Bug 1022921] [NEW] Banshee ignores the last track of playlists/albums
Public bug reported: Package: banshee Architecture: amd64 Version: 2.4.1-3ubuntu1~precise1 If I select a playlist with 30 files, banshee will show 29 files instead, the last track is not shown nor played. Though the data is correctly reported in the statusbar (30 songs - 2 hours, 21 minutes, 17 seconds - 204.9 MB), the list view is missing the last file. The bug also happens when I view the whole library and pick an album with 20 tracks (only 19 are shown), and automatic and static playlists. It does not happen when the track list contains only a few files, it seems to be related to the scroll area. If the playlist fits in the screen without scrollbars, all tracks are displayed correctly, but when scrollbars are added, the last track is excluded from the list and not accesible. This happens on version 2.4.1-3ubuntu1~precise1 in Ubuntu 12.04, and also happens with older releases of banshee packages for 12.04. It was working correctly on previous Ubuntu releases, but I'm afraid I can't tell exactly when this bug was introduced. ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022921 Title: Banshee ignores the last track of playlists/albums To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1022921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022921] Re: Banshee ignores the last track of playlists/albums
Starting with an empty database does not fix it, unfortunately. I've been doing some more tests: starting banshee in maximized state does not show the bug, so it is a workaround (looks quite ugly with a very high resolution monitor, but well...). Starting non-maximized losses the last track until the window, or just the playlist frame, is resized. The missing track magically appears when the UI is resized and everything works until I close and start banshee again. The last track can't be seen and can't be selected with mouse, but it *can* be played if I select it with the keyboard (selecting the last visible item, then arrow down and enter). So I guess it is a visualization issue in the scrolling area, the track seems to be there, just hidden. I wonder, if it's not reproducible in your banshee maybe something else may be corrupted here... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022921 Title: Banshee ignores the last track of playlists/albums To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1022921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881079] Re: FIXED: spurious Waiting up to 60 more seconds for network configuration message at startup, but all network devices are up
Please note there is a problem with removable network devices (usually usb). The file /etc/init/network-interface.conf causes network devices to be brought up or down as a result of hardware being added or removed, as its own comment says, but they must be configured as auto in /etc/network/interfaces (exec ifup --allow auto $INTERFACE), which will most likely cause the Waiting up to 60 more seconds for network configuration message at boot. For removable network devices, there should be a method of bringing them up and down correctly without requiring them to be plugged at boot. It was working on previous releases of Ubuntu, probably because there was no delay at boot for missing devices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881079 Title: FIXED: spurious Waiting up to 60 more seconds for network configuration message at startup, but all network devices are up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-common/+bug/881079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120687] Re: Caseless collate sequence in en_GB.UTF8
Of course it should go upstream, but I don't understand why it is outside the scope of Ubuntu to fix a problem for its users. Ubuntu choose Unity, a non-standard desktop environment, and refuses to choose a non-standard collate sequence (which provides actually more standard behaivior for many of its users that the upstream choice). I certainly can't understand the reasoning behind that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120687 Title: Caseless collate sequence in en_GB.UTF8 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120687] Re: Caseless collate sequence in en_GB.UTF8
It is a problem for me too. And it is worse when using es_ES locale, because we can't use LC_COLLATE=C, it is very important to match accented characters in files and directories which LC_COLLATE=C does not do. This is ridiculous and counterintuitive: touch A B ls [a-b]* A This will be fixed if collate order places upper case letters and lower case letters separate, like LC_COLLATE=C does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120687 Title: Caseless collate sequence in en_GB.UTF8 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated
It is already reported and marked as a duplicate of this bug -- [KMS] gem objects not deallocated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563400] Re: [RV515] Playing flash video causes memory hogging
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 565981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981 I commented on bug #565981 and people told me to fill a new bug (because it seems to be a different issue), so it seems that this is not a duplicate. The object bytes count does not drop for me, it keeps growing and growing on fully updated Ubuntu 10.04 (no external repositories, no ppa, just plain Ubuntu installation). The 2GB of RAM and most swap gets full at around 5-7 days of uptime, swapping becomes extreme and must be rebooted. I have ATI radeon RV280, free driver, and KMS enabled. -- [RV515] Playing flash video causes memory hogging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569711] Re: The system is very slow. The memory is not freed after closing a program. (-pae)
I have an always growing gem_objects count, 2BG of memory gets eventually full and extreme swapping starts. Closing apps never drops the count down. I have ATI radeon RV280, KMS enabled, Ubuntu 10.04, no external repositories, no ppa, just plain Ubuntu installation fully updated. Tried with -generic kernel and a custom compiled 2.6.33.3 kernel from kernel.org, both are the same. If I disable KMS then xorg enters an infinite loop or something like that, it can't be killed with kill -9 and the computer must be rebooted with sysrq (different bug, first appeared on Karmic but still present on Lucid), so I must have KMS enabled. -- The system is very slow. The memory is not freed after closing a program. (-pae) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563400] Re: [RV515] Playing flash video causes memory hogging
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 565981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981 Ah, OK thanks. There are lots of similar bugs in the list, I added comments to several of them but I'm not sure if it is already there or not... I guess I should file a new bug report anyways but maybe later, I need the computer so I will fix it by downgrading to an old Ubuntu version for now. -- [RV515] Playing flash video causes memory hogging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated
The object bytes count does not drop for me, it keeps growing and growing on fully updated Ubuntu 10.04. Closing applications never drops the count. Maybe not exactly the same bug, but the symptomps looks exactly like the original. The 2GB of RAM and most swap gets full at around 5-7 days of uptime, swapping becomes extreme and must be rebooted. I have ATI radeon RV280, free driver, and KMS enabled (xorg crash when KMS is disabled, different bug). GLX version: 1.2 Can I do something to debug this? -- [KMS] gem objects not deallocated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377632] Re: Crash with stack smashing detected at start
Well, if nobody plans to fix the package for Ubuntu 9.04 you can set it to won't fix but, as far as I know, it is still broken in 9.04 (end of life is still not reached), and certainly I would prefer the package to be removed from repositores as a broken package is not very useful IMHO. -- Crash with stack smashing detected at start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553660] Re: Pattern matching gives unexpected results
Hey, I think I found the reason while sleeping :) The pattern [A-Z] always excludes lowercase a, and: $ ls [a-z]* matches all files starting with any letter *except* the ones starting with uppercase Z (under most locales I've tested). It can be argued to be correct behaviour, but certainly counterintuitive IMHO. Should this bug be changed to a wishlist for an explicit notice in manual page? -- Pattern matching gives unexpected results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553660] [NEW] Pattern matching gives unexpected results
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash $ export LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 $ touch a b c $ ls [A-Z] b c Why do collation order in english (and many other locales) do exclude a but include b and c in previous expansion? Maybe this is correct behaviour by some obscure reason, but my poor brain fails to understand the logic behind it... ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Pattern matching gives unexpected results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130437] Re: udev rule can fail to run ifdown, break reinserting device
It looks broken again since I've upgraded to Karmic. ifupdown 0.6.8ubuntu20 changelog says: Replace the udev rule with a per-interface Upstart job. Works again if I put the old udev rule file in /etc/udev/rules.d -- udev rule can fail to run ifdown, break reinserting device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377632] Re: Crash with stack smashing detected at start
Version 2:0+20090126-1 is now included in Ubuntu 9.10, it works. -- Crash with stack smashing detected at start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377632] [NEW] Crash with stack smashing detected at start
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: schism Ubuntu 9.04, package: schism 2:0+20080403-1.1 Package is unusable, always crashes at startup: *** stack smashing detected ***: schism terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x48)[0xb7bcbda8] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0xb7bcbd60] schism[0x8094046] schism[0x80855ec] schism[0x807b085] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb7ae4775] schism(__gxx_personality_v0+0x2a9)[0x804c5c1] === Memory map: 08048000-080f r-xp 03:01 2118287/usr/bin/schism 080f-080f1000 r--p 000a7000 03:01 2118287/usr/bin/schism 080f1000-080fd000 rw-p 000a8000 03:01 2118287/usr/bin/schism 080fd000-082cb000 rw-p 080fd000 00:00 0 0900f000-09031000 rw-p 0900f000 00:00 0 [heap] b790e000-b7937000 rw-p b790e000 00:00 0 b7937000-b793b000 r-xp 03:01 2118660/usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 b793b000-b793c000 rw-p 3000 03:01 2118660/usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 b793c000-b7943000 r-xp 03:01 33687 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt-2.9.so b7943000-b7944000 r--p 6000 03:01 33687 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt-2.9.so b7944000-b7945000 rw-p 7000 03:01 33687 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt-2.9.so b7945000-b7947000 r-xp 03:01 2116745/usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 b7947000-b7948000 r--p 1000 03:01 2116745/usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 b7948000-b7949000 rw-p 2000 03:01 2116745/usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 b7949000-b7961000 r-xp 03:01 2115533/usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.1.0 b7961000-b7962000 r--p 00017000 03:01 2115533/usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.1.0 b7962000-b7963000 rw-p 00018000 03:01 2115533/usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.1.0 b7963000-b7978000 r-xp 03:01 33685 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.9.so b7978000-b7979000 r--p 00014000 03:01 33685 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.9.so b7979000-b797a000 rw-p 00015000 03:01 33685 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.9.so b797a000-b797d000 rw-p b797a000 00:00 0 b797d000-b799 r-xp 03:01 2116331 /usr/lib/libdirect-1.0.so.0.1.0 b799-b7991000 r--p 00012000 03:01 2116331 /usr/lib/libdirect-1.0.so.0.1.0 b7991000-b7992000 rw-p 00013000 03:01 2116331 /usr/lib/libdirect-1.0.so.0.1.0 b7992000-b7999000 r-xp 03:01 2116334 /usr/lib/libfusion-1.0.so.0.1.0 b7999000-b799a000 r--p 6000 03:01 2116334 /usr/lib/libfusion-1.0.so.0.1.0 b799a000-b799b000 rw-p 7000 03:01 2116334 /usr/lib/libfusion-1.0.so.0.1.0 b799b000-b79ff000 r-xp 03:01 2116333 /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.0.so.0.1.0 b79ff000-b7a0 r--p 00063000 03:01 2116333 /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.0.so.0.1.0 b7a0-b7a01000 rw-p 00064000 03:01 2116333 /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.0.so.0.1.0 b7a01000-b7ac4000 r-xp 03:01 2116444/usr/lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 b7ac4000-b7ac6000 r--p 000c2000 03:01 2116444/usr/lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 b7ac6000-b7ac9000 rw-p 000c4000 03:01 2116444/usr/lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 b7ac9000-b7acb000 r-xp 03:01 33187 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.9.so b7acb000-b7acc000 r--p 1000 03:01 33187 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.9.so b7acc000-b7acd000 rw-p 2000 03:01 33187 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.9.so b7acd000-b7ace000 rw-p b7acd000 00:00 0 b7ace000-b7c2a000 r-xp 03:01 33182 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7c2a000-b7c2b000 ---p 0015c000 03:01 33182 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7c2b000-b7c2d000 r--p 0015c000 03:01 33182 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7c2d000-b7c2e000 rw-p 0015e000 03:01 33182 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7c2e000-b7c31000 rw-p b7c2e000 00:00 0 b7c31000-b7c3e000 r-xp 03:01 32850 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7c3e000-b7c3f000 r--p c000 03:01 32850 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7c3f000-b7c4 rw-p d000 03:01 32850 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7c4-b7c64000 r-xp 03:01 33188 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm-2.9.so b7c64000-b7c65000 r--p 00023000 03:01 33188 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm-2.9.so b7c65000-b7c66000 rw-p 00024000 03:01 33188 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm-2.9.so b7c66000-b7d4a000 r-xp 03:01 2113564/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.10 b7d4a000-b7d4e000 r--p 000e3000 03:01 2113564/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.10 b7d4e000-b7d4f000 rw-p 000e7000 03:01 2113564/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.10 b7d4f000-b7d55000 rw-p b7d4f000 00:00 0 b7d55000-b7d57000
[Bug 372184] [NEW] package installs file under /usr/local/bin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-twisted-lore ubuntu 9.04 python-twisted-lore 8.2.0-0ubuntu1 It should not install files under /usr/local, AFAIK. $ dpkg -S /usr/local/bin/lore python-twisted-lore: /usr/local/bin/lore ** Affects: twisted-lore (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- package installs file under /usr/local/bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
