[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
Can somebody confirm what package we're supposed to install? A search in software centre for Guest Additions only returns the host package. Perhaps we should have a separate bug for something like it's totally not obvious what you're supposed to install to get Guest Additions working (there isn't even any indication that you shouldn't be using the standard Guest Additions that comes with VBox on your host)? What do you guys think? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749602] [NEW] Nothing tells you what Guest Additions to install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 This bug report is a spin-off of bug 738330. When you install Ubuntu as the guest OS in Virtual Box, your natural first instinct is to install Guest Additions from the Virtual Box menu. According to comments in 738330 you shouldn't be doing this, instead you should install package virtualbox-ose-guest-x11. The problem is twofold: There is nothing that tells you not to install the Guest Additions from within Virtual Box The package virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 is hard to find - searching Software Centre for Guest Additions doesn't find it. My solution would be to detect n startup if we're running in a Virtual Box and if so place a link on the desktop with an obvious name like Install Guest Additions that when clicked would quickly and easily install them. I know this may sound like a trivial issue, but to a novice (such as somebody trying Ubuntu for the first time in vbox) it's a massive turn off (see bug 738330) which could make people give up on Ubuntu. Ideally, I suppose we'd detect that they're in a vbox that could run the guest additions and install them automatically when they install Ubuntu, but that would probably be quick a lot of work? ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749602 Title: Nothing tells you what Guest Additions to install -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
Filed as bug 749602 - please lend your weight to it if you think it's worth fixing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
Compiz is working, for me, but the panel and launcher only go transparent when I mouse over them, and the drop shadows are just opaque black boxes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 742024] Re: Inconsistency between sound and network icons
Same problem here. Problem did not occur with previous (rather swanky) icon. The other new icons function as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742024 Title: Inconsistency between sound and network icons -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
Yep, I am using 4.0.4 guest additions too. @Felix - that in the repos is it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
@Felix - I've found a package called virtualbox-guest-additions in the software center, but it doesn't sound like that's what you mean: This package provides an iso image which contains the guest additions for Linux, Solaris and Windows to be installed on the host system. The guest systems then can mount the iso and install the guest additions from there. so that sounds like you're supposed to install it on the host. I can't find the package virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 in the software center but it installs from the command line (is there a reason that's not in the software center?). So, after installing that, now I have the guest addition options like autoresize and seamless, but now my desktop has no launcher or panel, and if I try to start compiz from the terminal: sam@sam-VirtualBox:~$ compiz --replace Backend : gconf Integration : true Profile : unity Adding plugins Initializing core options...done Initializing bailer options...done Initializing detection options...done Initializing composite options...done OpenGL Warning: No pincher, please call crStateSetCurrentPointers() in your SPU Initializing opengl options...done OpenGL Info: Using XSHM for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap Initializing decor options...done Initializing mousepoll options...done Initializing vpswitch options...done Initializing animation options...done Initializing snap options...done Initializing expo options...done Initializing move options...done Initializing place options...done Initializing grid options...done Initializing gnomecompat options...done Initializing wall options...done Initializing ezoom options...done Initializing workarounds options...done Initializing staticswitcher options...done Initializing resize options...done Initializing fade options...done Initializing scale options...done Initializing session options...done ** (unknown:1758): DEBUG: Unity accessibility initialization Initializing unityshell options...done ** (unknown:1758): DEBUG: MaximizeIfBigEnough: Gnome-terminal window size doesn't fit ** (unknown:1758): DEBUG: PlaceEntry: Applications ** (unknown:1758): DEBUG: PlaceEntry: Commands ** (unknown:1758): DEBUG: PlaceEntry: Files Folders ** (unknown:1758): WARNING **: Failed to fetch view type at /org/ayatana/bamf/window71303205: Method ViewType with signature on interface org.ayatana.bamf.view doesn't exist terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc Aborted (core dumped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] [NEW] Today's Natty update means no 3D in virtual box
Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu in Virtual Box on a Mac host and today's update has broken 3D. Normally every time there's an update I restart Ubuntu and see a 2D interface, but then I re-install the guest additions and restart and see a 3D interface, but no such look today. I imagine you already know why this is (some config file listing supported hardware or something?), but if not I'm happy to grab you any diagnostic info I can (if you give me instructions). ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no 3D in virtual box -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738330] Re: Today's Natty update means no 3D in virtual box
I can't run those commands, RedSingularity, am on an OS X host, but I'm using virtual box 4.0.4 r70112. Also, you're right - seamless and auto- resize aren't working either, so the problem is that Guest Additions don't work in the newest build. Could the bug title be changed to reflect this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330 Title: Today's Natty update means no 3D in virtual box -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734118] [NEW] Panel should (optionally) go opaque when window is maximized
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: light-themes Some people would like a transparant panel when no window is maximized and an opaque panel when a window is maximized (I can't decide if I am one such person). I expect this could easily be added as an option. On a related note, I personally think it would look better to lose the narrow opaque rings around the window buttons in the transparant panel when a window is maximized, especialy since the indicators on the other side of the panel don't have any outlines. ** Affects: light-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734118 Title: Panel should (optionally) go opaque when window is maximized -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418203] Re: Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0 doesn't make sense
Still here in Natty alpha 2 (with Firefox 4.0b11) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418203 Title: Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0 doesn't make sense -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 705461] Re: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher
You're right, it works in the latest version but doesn't indicate the number of windows. On 31 January 2011 14:17, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: thank you for your bug report, how did you start the writer? the icon starts it correctly there, it doesn't seem to match the running instance to display the small arrow though -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705461 Title: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “unity” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “libreoffice” source package in Natty: New Status in “unity” source package in Natty: New Bug description: Binary package hint: libreoffice Start LibreOffice (I've tried the generic start center, and the word processor), right click on it in the Launcher and click keep in Launcher, close the app, click the launcher icon for the app. It wibbles for a bit, then goes blank, the app doesn't launch. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.3.0~rc3-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jan 20 15:13:10 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/705461/+subscribe -- Sam Illingworth -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705461 Title: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705711] Re: Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot
I think there are too many different dialogs involved. We have: option 1) you press Print Screen and you get a dialogue with no options other than saving the screenshot option 2) you run --interactive which gives you a dialog with options, followed by the dialog from option 1 The way I see it the dialog in option 1 is pointless. It should just take the screenshot and save it to your desktop (without the cursor, in my opinion, I doubt many people want that by default, but the defualt behaviour should be customizable). Option 2 should have the save location built in so it doesn't lead on to another dialog. The user should have the choice which option is run when he presses print screen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705711 Title: Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705461] [NEW] LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libreoffice Start LibreOffice (I've tried the generic start center, and the word processor), right click on it in the Launcher and click keep in Launcher, close the app, click the launcher icon for the app. It wibbles for a bit, then goes blank, the app doesn't launch. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.3.0~rc3-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jan 20 15:13:10 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705461 Title: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705461] Re: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705461 Title: LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705710] [NEW] Update should check (refresh) automatically when run
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager When you start update-manager it's unintuitive that you have to click Check to check for updates - that's what you expect the programme you just started to do anyway. It should check automatically. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.145.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 21 02:22:40 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/update-manager InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705710 Title: Update should check (refresh) automatically when run -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705710] Re: Update should check (refresh) automatically when run
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705710 Title: Update should check (refresh) automatically when run -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705711] [NEW] Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screenshot When you take a screenshot a dialogue pops up asking you where to save. This dialogue should have the option of hiding the cursor. The option may be configurable somewhere, but it's not intuitive or easy to use, it should be right there when you take the screenshot. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: dash 0.5.5.1-7.2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 21 02:31:08 2011 ExecutablePath: /bin/dash InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: dash ** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705711 Title: Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705711] Re: Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705711 Title: Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you take a screenshot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658301] Re: Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre
I'm not sure what more to add to this - I've tried both the 64 and 32 bit version of 10.10, the normal download from the Ubuntu website, on two machines, and had the same issue on both. Are you sure you've tried it on a fresh install? Maybe you've ticked something in some settings somewhere that says it's OK to use untrusted packages or something? Steps to reproduce: Clean install of 10.10 Open Software Centre Try to install Gimp If that doesn't work for you, is there any more info you could recommend me gathering on my systems? -- Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658301] [NEW] Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center On a fresh Ubuntu 10.10 install when you go to install GIMP from the Software Centre you get the message Requires installation of untrusted packages and then the installation terminates. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: software-center 3.0.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 11 13:07:16 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/software-center/software-center InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658301] Re: Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301/+attachment/1684389/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301/+attachment/1684390/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301/+attachment/1684391/+files/ProcStatus.txt -- Cannot install GIMP or other apps from Software Centre https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 491521] Re: Decorations and RGBA
Did you get an answer to that? On 21 February 2010 16:32, Kari Takanen re...@psimerion.org wrote: So how does one enable it? -- Decorations and RGBA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491521 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Ayatana Ubuntu Love Project: In Progress Status in GNOME Desktop Common Files: Unknown Status in GTK+ GUI Toolkit: Unknown Status in Nautilus: Unknown Status in “gnome-desktop” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “gnome-screensaver” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in “gtk-recordmydesktop” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “libgksu” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: For Lucid, I'd like to get the new decorations feature integrated. This patch adds support for doing client-side window decorations, which pulls in support for RGBA colormaps. The new decorations feature requires explicit support from a theme before it becomes active (it defaults to being disabled). However, RGBA support is enabled by default and there is a chance for some fallout from this being added. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-ubuntu/+bug/491521/+subscribe -- Sam Illingworth -- Decorations and RGBA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431217] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 2.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Before you go blocking people perhaps you could tell us how to utilize this fix? I still get this error every time I do an update, regardless of how many times I reload the repos. Is some manual change required? -- package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 2.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510454] Re: Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network
The attached screen-shot confirms the settings are the same in each app for the same account (Empathy on the left, Pidgin on the right). Setting a proxy on my machine makes no difference, but bear in mind that even if I choose Direct internet connection, my corporate network will route me through a proxy transparently anyway. I think that's what Empathy can't handle but Pidgin can. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38873446/Screenshot.png -- Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510454] Re: Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network
Sorry, ignore that first screenshot - I had a Google account showing in Empathy and an MSN account showing in Pidgin. /This/ screenshot shows both apps using the same MSN account with the same settings. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38873455/Screenshot.png -- Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453279] Re: evolution mapi connection crash seg fault
THANK YOU! :D -- evolution mapi connection crash seg fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453279 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 472552] Re: Please upgrade evolution-mapi to 0.28.1
THANK YOU! :D -- Please upgrade evolution-mapi to 0.28.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510454] [NEW] Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Empathy cannot connect (Network error) to my gtalk or MSN account over my work's network. I assume this is caused by corporate firewalls and transparent proxies and other annoying things like that, but Pidgin doesn't have any problems. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jan 21 02:43:05 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/empathy InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: empathy 2.28.1.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic SourcePackage: empathy Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic i686 ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510454] Re: Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173860/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173861/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173862/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173863/XsessionErrors.txt -- Empathy Network error with any account over corporate network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293660] Re: tsclient always tries to reconnect
@ liquidweaver :D I love you. -- tsclient always tries to reconnect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293660] Re: tsclient always tries to reconnect
This bug's being going on for ages! Please let's get it fixed for Lucid! Can anyone give me instructions for installing that patch (and indeed other patches)? -- tsclient always tries to reconnect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461839] Re: Administrative Control Centre does not work (wrong sudo-method)
Does that workaround work for everyone? I did it but for some reason every time I boot I'm running at 30hz and have to change it to 60 every time. I thought that might be caused by doing gksudo amdcccle instead of amdxdg-su -c amdcccle? -- Administrative Control Centre does not work (wrong sudo-method) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 304889] Re: Does not use system proxy settings
I have this problem but I don't have any proxy set in Gnome, it all happens invisibly somewhere on the corporate LAN. Is this likely to be the same issue? -- Does not use system proxy settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212055] Re: Unable to download sheep
I also had no problem with the version compiled from source, but have this problem with the version from the repo. Trouble with using the compiled version is that it doesn't seem to take the same arguments as the old version in the repo, and I can't get it to run with xwinwrap :( -- Unable to download sheep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
Works for me in fresh Karmic install :) -- Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Well, I suppose it's good that it's not affecting other people, but I've never manually edited my sources file, and I've disabled every optional repo so I'm only looking at the standard Ubuntu ones, so this would still seem to be an Ubuntu bug. Hmm. Well, I'm planning on doing a fresh install when Karmic is out, so I imagine this will be resolved in three days! Well, not resolved, but it won't effect me any more, and since nobody else has subscribed I don't suppose it matters. I don't like just giving up though, something must have gone wrong and without having found out what we've no reason to assume that that bug isn't still in there somewhere, waiting, watching, slowly and surely drawing its plans against us... -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Well, I suppose it's good that it's not affecting other people, but I've never manually edited my sources file, and I've disabled every optional repo so I'm only looking at the standard Ubuntu ones, so this would still seem to be an Ubuntu bug. Hmm. Well, I'm planning on doing a fresh install when Karmic is out, so I imagine this will be resolved in three days! Well, not resolved, but it won't effect me any more, and since nobody else has subscribed I don't suppose it matters. I don't like just giving up though, something must have gone wrong and without having found out what we've no reason to assume that that bug isn't still in there somewhere, waiting, watching, slowly and surely drawing its plans against us... -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Attached ** Attachment added: sources.list http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33957627/sources.list -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Attached ** Attachment added: sources.list http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33957627/sources.list -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452642] [NEW] The 'x is an executable text file' dialogue is not user friendly
Public bug reported: I originally raised this as an idea on the brainstorm, but was told it should be reported as a bug by the brainstorm admin (the brainstorm is here: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/21745/). When you click on an executable text file, such as a script to which you've just made a change which you want to test, a dialogue appears asking if you want to open it, run it, run it in a terminal, or cancel. I think this dialogue is severely flawed. Why aren't the two run buttons next to each other? Why isn't cancel on the far left where it usually is? What if I want to edit the file instead of displaying it (I know the Display button /actually/ opens it for editing, but it doesn't say that)? Why can't I tell it to stop asking me every time I click on the file, if I always want to do the same thing? And why is the dialogue so cluttered? My solution is as follows: - Move Cancel to the far left, because that's where we've come to expect it to be - Rename the Display button Display/Edit, because that's what it's for - Get rid of the Run in Terminal option, but put a Run in Terminal tick box under the Run button, because the dialogue is cluttered - Add a Remember my Choice tick box It occurs to me that this is probably trivial to fix - could it be a paper-cut? I don't know if you could say it effects lots of users, but it does happen on any executable file. I know that the last thing my mum wants to see when she clicks an executable file is a scary technical sounding dialogue - if we could simplify it (by reducing the number of buttons) and give her a remember my choice option so that she doesn't get bothered with it every time, she'd be a lot happier. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- The 'x is an executable text file' dialogue is not user friendly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124348] Re: Logging off causes error on client
This is a high priority bug. Scenario: - User A leaves themselves connected to Remote Machine then goes away from their local machine - User B has a high priority reason to connect to Remote Machine, so User B connects, disconnecting User A - Since User A is not around to click cancel, their TSC automatically reconnects, kicking off User B in the middle of something critical - repeat ad infinitum In a production environment this is a very big deal. Also, what's the point in this feature anyway? If you're at your machine when you get disconnected you can click reconnect manually, and you can do so straight away so you're never going to use the timed auto- reconnect anyway, and if you're not at your machine you can't click cancel (even though if you're not there to click cancel there's no point connecting, and if you were there to click cancel then it wouldn't need to be automated). It seems as though this feature is there solely to create problems. -- Logging off causes error on client https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424071] Re: screenshot not working
Sorry for the delay. Oh, sorry, thought I had included the version I was on. I was using the Karmic alpha but I've had to switch back to Jaunty for various reasons (shouldn't really have been using an alpha version on my work machine I suppose). I don't know if this still exists in the beta, but I expect it would have been raised many times if it had, so unless someone fancies testing it I think we can assume it's resolved. -- screenshot not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
OK, I've tried that, can still replicate. Here's a screenshot showing the samba packages sorted by latest version; you're right - some are 3, some 3.1. Funny thing is, if I go to Force Version on samba-common it lists the two options as 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 (now) 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 (Jaunty) But I'm using Jaunty - why isn't the Jaunty version the one I have? If I select the Jaunty version it wants to remove smbclient, ubuntu-desktop and winbind. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33211659/Screenshot.png -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Do you mean the Download from option on the first tab of Software Sources? I tried changing that a couple of times, no difference. Can anyone replicate this? What's showing up under latest version for the various samba packages for you guys? -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
OK, I've tried that, can still replicate. Here's a screenshot showing the samba packages sorted by latest version; you're right - some are 3, some 3.1. Funny thing is, if I go to Force Version on samba-common it lists the two options as 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 (now) 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 (Jaunty) But I'm using Jaunty - why isn't the Jaunty version the one I have? If I select the Jaunty version it wants to remove smbclient, ubuntu-desktop and winbind. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33211659/Screenshot.png -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Do you mean the Download from option on the first tab of Software Sources? I tried changing that a couple of times, no difference. Can anyone replicate this? What's showing up under latest version for the various samba packages for you guys? -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444926] [NEW] samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
Public bug reported: Cannot install samba, so unable to create shares. Here are the errors Synaptic gives me if I try to install smbfs or samba: smbfs: Depends: samba-common (=2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) but 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 is to be installed samba: Depends: samba-common (=2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) but 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 is to be installed ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124348] Re: Logging off causes error on client
I agree that this isn't a papercut, but will it still get fixed? Perhaps it should be raised upstream? Who makes the remote desktop client? -- Logging off causes error on client https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428363] [NEW] Nautilus does not remember background gradients for all folders
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Assign a couple of background colours so that they make a gradient. Works fine for one folder, but if you use middle-click or control-click to apply it to all folders, then close and open Nautilus, only the second colour you select has been remembered, as solid colour. You cannot set a colour gradient for all folders. Ubuntu 9.04. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus does not remember background gradients for all folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424067] [NEW] volum is either silent or full in karmic
Public bug reported: I was going to include some screenshots with this, but screenshots aren't working in Karmic either (I'll raise that next). I've found that my volume control isn't working. Anything lower than about 20% is silent, anything higher is full volume. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- volum is either silent or full in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424067 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424071] [NEW] screenshot not working
Public bug reported: I've checked the key assignment, but pressing my prinst screen key (while recognised by the keyboard shortcuts application) is not causing the print screen application to pop up. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- screenshot not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136336] Re: Compiz shift-switcher should show preview for minimized windows
bumps Agreed - while Live Previews would be nice, can't we at least have a none-stretched icon or a cached thumbnail of the minimized application in the meantime? -- Compiz shift-switcher should show preview for minimized windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
Well, with Super mapped to the win keys I can now (in Jaunty) use the Windows key in any short-cut, so that appears to be part of this bug fixed. If other Jaunty users can confirm this is fixed then all that remains is to change the default setting when Ubuntu is installed. Would that be a design decision though? If you change it to Super so you can use it as a modifier you lose the ability to use the Windows key on its own (anyone know of a workaround for that?). What's the procedure for proposing a change like this, and does everyone agree this is now working in Jaunty? -- Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
I've just read through this entire thread - to summarize: It seems we have two/three issues: 1) The out-of-the-box behaviour only allows the windows key to be used on it's own, not as part of a shortcut using the keyboard shortcut applet 2) The workaround of setting super or meta is mapped to the windows key only makes it work for some commands but not others - someone suggested this is due to whether the shortcuts are stored in different places: Philipp Kohlbecher wrote on 2007-06-04: The difference seems to be that the shortcut for launching the terminal is set in gconf setting /apps/metacity/global_keybindings (as is the shortcut for minimizing all windows to show the desktop, for example), while the shortcut for locking the screen is set in /apps/gnome_settings_daemon/keybindings (as is the shortcut for launching the web browser, for example) 3) The workaround apparently breaks the behaviour of Alt Gr: alca wrote on 2009-04-27: yesterday i tried the workaround proposed by smkururu and i answered some questions written by me (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/12153/comments/106): changing 'System Preferences Keyboard Layouts Layout Options Alt/Win key behavior' to 'Meta is mapped to Win keys' the effect is that the AltGr button does not have a behaviour like before: no key-combination is available (i cannot use the character '@' with AltGr + ò, for example) Anyone have anything to add? More details, more complaints, progress updates? Do we have any developers looking into this? -- Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
Hi Guys - firstly I apologise for not being very technial here - I'm quite new to Linux. For me setting Super is mapped to the win keys or Meta is mapped to the win keys (they appear to do the same thing, and shouldn't one of them be selected by default anyway? I've installed Ubuntu on four completely different kinds of machine and have had this problem on all of them) only partially resolves the issue. I can now assign Windows+T for launching the terminal, Windows+D for showing the desktop, but I can't assign Windows+N (or, indeed, Windows+anything) for opening the home folder (ie starting Nautilus). I /can/ assign Ctrl+Alt+N to open the Home Folder, just not anything beginning with the Windows key. Same thing with lock screen - Ctrl_Alt_L works, Windows+L doesn't. For clarification - when I say Windows+Key I'm talking about Mod4+Key (as I said, I turned on Super is mapped to the win keys - without that I could only use the Windows key (super as it was called then, not Mod4) on its own). I don't know how relevant it is, but I've always been able to use the windows key properly in CompizConfig, and I note that settings such as the Expo can be changed in Keyboard Shortcuts in gnome or in CompizConfig. When Pedro says this has been fixed upstream does that mean the fix is yet to be released, or has been released? If the fix involves users changing the Super is mapped to the win keys setting then I really think the default should be changed on there - a novice would never find that! Sorry for the over-use of brackets in the post, I just love brackets. -- Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
