[Bug 1891815] Re: Multi-seat stopped working in Ubuntu 20.04
In Ubuntu 20.04.1 the latest gdm3 package is only 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 and I have a similar, although probably different problem: GDM wouldn't show a login screen on the second seat connected to an NVIDIA graphics card. After disabling Wayland in /etc/gdm3/custom.conf the problem disappeared and I again got a login screen on the second seat. I would suspect that maybe the NVIDIA blacklist is part of the problem because gdm3 decides to start a Wayland session for seat0 and an X11 session for seat-1. Why can't it start a Wayland session for both seats? My hardware: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 610] (rev a1) Intel is seat0 and NVIDIA is seat-1 Attached please find the gdm3 debug log, the interesting parts about seats look like this: $ grep seat gdm-multiseat-wayland-nvidia-problem.txt Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: enumerating seats from logind Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: wayland login display for seat seat0 requested Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: Adding display on seat seat0 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmDisplay: seat id: (null) Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmDisplay: seat id: seat0 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: Created user session for user 129 on display /org/gnome/DisplayManager/Displays/94424245309920 (seat seat0) Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: X11 login display for seat seat-1 requested Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: Adding display on seat seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmDisplay: seat id: (null) Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmDisplay: seat id: seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmServer: Starting X server process: /usr/bin/Xorg :0 -background none -noreset -verbose 7 -logverbose 7 -core -auth /var/run/gdm3/auth-for-gdm-P9W4S0/database -seat seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type wayland, program? yes, seat seat0 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type wayland, program? yes, seat seat0 Okt 28 09:29:08 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type wayland, program? yes, seat seat0 Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: creating new display on seat0 because of VT change Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: wayland login display for seat seat0 requested Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: Created user session for user 129 on display /org/gnome/DisplayManager/Displays/94424245244496 (seat seat-1) Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type (null), program? yes, seat seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type (null), program? yes, seat seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:09 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmSession: type (null), program? yes, seat seat-1 Okt 28 09:29:10 brho gdm3[8608]: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: X11 login display for seat seat-1 requested For me the workaround was to disable Wayland complete like this: $ cat /etc/gdm3/custom.conf [daemon] WaylandEnable=false It would be very nice to get multiseat to work again and please also with Wayland (X is dead, right?) ** Attachment added: "gdm-multiseat-wayland-nvidia-problem.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1891815/+attachment/5428306/+files/gdm-multiseat-wayland-nvidia-problem.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891815 Title: Multi-seat stopped working in Ubuntu 20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1891815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
Thanks! Can you link here the upstream bug report and fix once it is there? What about the other PPDs that don't set a default resolution? I would suppose that they suffer from the same problem if the printer supports more than 300dpi. On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 02:29, gf <1385...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > OK, thanks for the update, Schlomo. I think there is enough information > in this report now that it can be send to the programmers. For their > ease, I will add a summary here. Please feel free to add any > corrections. > > --- > SUMMARY: > Ubuntu version 16.04 and 18.04 > > Problem is reproducable by the bug reporter. > Printer is HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP. > > Notes: > Printing documents with Hebrew fonts results in low quality with fuzzy > lines (default CUPS converts the print job to a 300dpi PS before giving it > to the hp driver) > > Expected behaviour: documents print at 600 dpi > Actual behaviour: documents are printing at 300 dpi > > Additional notes: > Bug reporter is in Ubuntu 16.04 but has checked the latest PPD file > (v3.18.7) and issue still exists. “The PPD does not define the > DefaultResolution parameter which causes CUPS to use a default of 300dpi.” > > Solution: > Add to the PPD for this printer: the DefaultResolution parameter. For > example: > *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi > --- > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 > > Title: > HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi > > Status in HPLIP: > Incomplete > Status in hplip package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > Running Ubuntu 14.04 running stock hplip 3.14.3 > > Printer HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP > > hp-check -t output is attached > > Problem: > > Initially I noticed that printing documents with Hebrew fonts results > in low quality with fuzzy lines. After some debugging I was able to > trace this down to the fact that by default CUPS converts the print > job to a 300dpi PS before giving it to the hp driver: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 261 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=one-sided > job-uuid=urn:uuid:c1da9224-d10b-3c2f-6a99-487121b8864c > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128121 > time-at-processing=1414128121 Duplex=None PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] No resolution information found > in the PPD file. > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Using image rendering > resolution 300 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r300 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/066575456f596 > > I was able to fix the problem by adding this resolution setting to the > PPD: > > *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi > > As a result the print job is converted at 600dpi instead of 300dpi > which leads to the expected good result: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 262 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'Duplex=None finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=two-sided-long-edge > job-uuid=urn:uuid:83e69459-c350-37e5-417d-9ca00f8c6bd9 > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128153 > time-at-processing=1414128153 PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Using image rendering > resolution 600 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r600 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/0666d544aec68 > > I think that the PPD is broken because it does not specify a > resolution. > > It would be nice if the PPD could be fixed. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
Using Ubuntu 16.04. I originally reported it when I was using 14.04, but the PPD hasn't seen any changes in all those years and nobody from the HPLIP developers looked at this bug (AFAIK). On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 14:11, gf <1385...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Schlomo, > Just to clarify and prep this report for the programmers, what version of > ubuntu are you in now? > Thanks > G > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 > > Title: > HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi > > Status in HPLIP: > Incomplete > Status in hplip package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > Running Ubuntu 14.04 running stock hplip 3.14.3 > > Printer HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP > > hp-check -t output is attached > > Problem: > > Initially I noticed that printing documents with Hebrew fonts results > in low quality with fuzzy lines. After some debugging I was able to > trace this down to the fact that by default CUPS converts the print > job to a 300dpi PS before giving it to the hp driver: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 261 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=one-sided > job-uuid=urn:uuid:c1da9224-d10b-3c2f-6a99-487121b8864c > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128121 > time-at-processing=1414128121 Duplex=None PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] No resolution information found > in the PPD file. > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Using image rendering > resolution 300 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r300 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/066575456f596 > > I was able to fix the problem by adding this resolution setting to the > PPD: > > *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi > > As a result the print job is converted at 600dpi instead of 300dpi > which leads to the expected good result: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 262 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'Duplex=None finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=two-sided-long-edge > job-uuid=urn:uuid:83e69459-c350-37e5-417d-9ca00f8c6bd9 > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128153 > time-at-processing=1414128153 PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Using image rendering > resolution 600 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r600 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/0666d544aec68 > > I think that the PPD is broken because it does not specify a > resolution. > > It would be nice if the PPD could be fixed. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
Thanks. I checked the 3.18.7 PPDs and found out that the problem is still not fixed. The root issue is that the PPD does not define the DefaultResolution parameter which causes CUPS to use a default of 300dpi. So the problem is that the *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi line is still missing from the PPD which I pointed out already at the beginning of this thread. It turns out that a lot of PPDs are missing this line: $ ( pwd ; zgrep -o DefaultResolution *ppd* | wc -l ; ls -l | wc -l ) ~/hplip-3.18.7/prnt/ps 256 339 As you can see, there are 339 PPD files in the prnt/ps directory and only 256 of them contain a DefaultResolution line. Probably the other ones also will have a similar bug if the printer supports more than the CUPS default of 300dpi I therefore kindly ask you to add the DefaultResolution line to the PPD. If you point me to a place where I can submit a Pull Request I will gladly do so. Unfortunately neither the Sourceforge nor the Launchpad project seem to contain the source code repo. On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 11:55, gf <1385...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Schlomo, > I think the latest version of hplip is 3.18.7 from August 2018 and can be > found here: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hplip/3.18.7+dfsg1-1 > > There is also the ability to download it directly from HP: > https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing > > click "Download HPLIP" > In the drop-down list, pick "Ubuntu" > Or, if you are familiar with tar, there are advanced options at the bottom > of that same page for downloading actual files. > > Hope this helps > :) > G > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 > > Title: > HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi > > Status in HPLIP: > Incomplete > Status in hplip package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > Running Ubuntu 14.04 running stock hplip 3.14.3 > > Printer HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP > > hp-check -t output is attached > > Problem: > > Initially I noticed that printing documents with Hebrew fonts results > in low quality with fuzzy lines. After some debugging I was able to > trace this down to the fact that by default CUPS converts the print > job to a 300dpi PS before giving it to the hp driver: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 261 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=one-sided > job-uuid=urn:uuid:c1da9224-d10b-3c2f-6a99-487121b8864c > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128121 > time-at-processing=1414128121 Duplex=None PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] No resolution information found > in the PPD file. > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Using image rendering > resolution 300 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r300 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/066575456f596 > > I was able to fix the problem by adding this resolution setting to the > PPD: > > *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi > > As a result the print job is converted at 600dpi instead of 300dpi > which leads to the expected good result: > > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Printer make and model: HP HP > Officejet Pro X576dw MFP > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for > pstops: pstops 262 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'Duplex=None finishings=3 > media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color > print-quality=4 sides=two-sided-long-edge > job-uuid=urn:uuid:83e69459-c350-37e5-417d-9ca00f8c6bd9 > job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128153 > time-at-processing=1414128153 PageSize=A4' > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Using image rendering > resolution 600 dpi > D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for gs: gs > -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout > -dLanguageLevel=3 -r600 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE > -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/0666d544aec68 > > I think that the PPD is broken because it does not specify a > resolution. > > It would be nice if the PPD could be fixed. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscripti
[Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
Can you please point me to the source repo of the PPD for this printer? The bug is in the PPD which explicitly limits the resolution to 300dpi even though the printer supports true 600dpi in hardware. I haven't upgraded to 18.04 yet so that I can happily check the PPD in your source code instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1680336] Re: libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path
Can you please explain why you believe that the root cause is a hard coded path in this extension? I unpacked the OXT and the embedded JAR file and could not find any "libreoffice" string in any of the files there. I could find all kind of other UI strings from the extension so that I tend to believe my test showing that the path is *not* hard coded. What else makes you so sure that only the extension can be blamed for this problem? --- Regarding your general point and closing this issue: I totally understand - and agree with - your line of arguments and also your view on what is proper with regard to file locations. Nevertheless I kindly ask you to reconsider adding my workaround (or something more appropriate to the same effect) to the LO packages on Ubuntu for the following reasons: * Users don't know or care why something fails. They just get frustrated. If we as Ubuntu have the chance to help them then we should do so. * If we can add a fix to Ubuntu that does not harm anybody but helps some people then IMHO we should do so - not as a step down from our high principles but as a step up towards just helping our users. * I estimate that we can "fix" 90% of Linux users of this extension * I have the impression that fixing it here will be much easier then getting DeutschePost to fix it, they don't really care about us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680336 Title: libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1680336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1680336] Re: libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path
I am not sure that the installation location has any effect except for those cases where people hard-code paths which I would not recommend in any case. This bug is more about setting the correct library path to match the installation choice taken by the LO Ubuntu flavor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680336 Title: libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1680336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1680336] [NEW] libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path
Public bug reported: I try to use the "E-Porto Add In" (extension to insert a stamp for the German postal system) from https://www.deutschepost.de/de/i /internetmarke-porto-drucken/e-porto-add-in.html on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64. The extension contains several XCU and one JAR: schlomo@brho:~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu265944hpbsb.tmp_/loeportoinstaller_v3_0_0.oxt$ ll total 744 drwxrwx--- 8 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 ./ drwxrwx--- 3 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 ../ drwxrwx--- 4 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 assets/ -rw-rw 1 schlomo schlomo 1339 Apr 5 06:45 description.xml drwxrwx--- 2 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 images/ drwxrwx--- 2 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 07:01 lib/ drwxrwx--- 2 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 licenses/ drwxrwx--- 2 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 META-INF/ -rw-rw 1 schlomo schlomo 721541 Apr 5 06:45 OOEporto.jar drwxrwx--- 3 schlomo schlomo 4096 Apr 5 06:45 registry/ schlomo@brho:~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu265944hpbsb.tmp_/loeportoinstaller_v3_0_0.oxt$ cat META-INF/manifest.xml http://openoffice.org/2001/manifest";> Using the extension throws the following Java exception: Exception in thread "Thread-1312" com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException at com.sun.star.comp.bridgefactory.BridgeFactory.createBridge(BridgeFactory.java:126) at com.sun.star.comp.urlresolver.UrlResolver$_UrlResolver.resolve(UrlResolver.java:107) at com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap(Bootstrap.java:349) at com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap(Bootstrap.java:280) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.comm.a.e(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.comm.a.c(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.comm.a.a(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.comm.a.a(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.core.e.c(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.core.e.a(Unknown Source) at de.deutschepost.ooeporto.gui.bM.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423) at com.sun.star.uno.UnoRuntime.getBridge(UnoRuntime.java:474) at com.sun.star.uno.UnoRuntime.getBridgeByName(UnoRuntime.java:512) at com.sun.star.comp.bridgefactory.BridgeFactory.createBridge(BridgeFactory.java:121) ... 11 more Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no java_uno in java.library.path at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1867) at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:870) at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1122) at com.sun.star.lib.uno.environments.remote.NativeThreadPool.(NativeThreadPool.java:77) at com.sun.star.lib.uno.environments.remote.ThreadPoolManager.create(ThreadPoolManager.java:46) at com.sun.star.lib.uno.bridges.java_remote.java_remote_bridge.(java_remote_bridge.java:330) ... 18 more The relevant part is java_uno. With libreoffice --strace I found out that actually it cannot find the libjava_uno.so library. I found a workaround by creating the /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/ooenv file with export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/classes:/usr/lib/libreoffice/program in it. This issue has been also discussed on UbuntuUsers.de: https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/e-porto-add-in-libreoffice-5-1-6-2 -kein-login-/ Can you please improve libreoffice / ure so that it will set the library path correctly without user intervention? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ure 5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-71.92-generic 4.4.49 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-71-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Wed Apr 5 08:12:47 2017 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-01 (338 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial ** Summary changed: - libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong library path + libreoffice java based extension cannot find java_uno due to wrong java.library.path -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680336 Title: libre
[Bug 1578473] Re: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software
Are you sure? The main difference I found between the main and the partner repo was the lack of the dep11 stuff. Who can add this information to the partner repo? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578473 Title: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1578473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1578473] Re: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software
Do you mean the Component files like in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/dep11/? Yes, the partner repo lacks those. How can we get the attention of the maintainer of the partner repo? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578473 Title: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1578473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1578473] Re: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software
It seems like Ubuntu-Software cannot install any package from the Ubuntu partner repo. I checked with Skype and google-cloud-sdk (see Screenshot). Any news on getting a fix? ** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing apt with Skype and ubuntu-software without Skype" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1578473/+attachment/4676020/+files/Screenshot%20from%202016-06-03%2017-05-00.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578473 Title: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1578473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1578473] Re: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software
** Summary changed: - I can't install flashplayer through the Ubuntu Software. + Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578473 Title: Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1578473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586751] Re: Cannot launch yubioath - throws Python ImportError
I was able to solve this problem by installing the python-setuptools package which was missing for python 2.7. Please add this to the dependency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586751 Title: Cannot launch yubioath - throws Python ImportError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yubioath-desktop/+bug/1586751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
A year has passed - what do I need to do to get this PPD fix upstream? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512347] Re: invalid sources.list generated from reading apt-setup/local0/repository
Can you please create installation media which includes this package? Or provide instructions how to test this fix which actually applies to the preseed installation and not to a running system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512347 Title: invalid sources.list generated from reading apt- setup/local0/repository To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/1512347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553121] Re: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt-setup/local0/key
Any ideas how to fix this? Or how to debug it further? Can anybody else confirm this problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553121 Title: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt- setup/local0/key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-setup/+bug/1553121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553121] Re: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt-setup/local0/key
Thanks for the link. It looks like a warning and not an error. Also, I don't understand how this issue would explain the observed behavior which is that any key specified for the local0 repo fails while using the same key and repo as local1 repo works. Since my repo key works as local1 repo I think that the problem is with the installer and not with the repo key. Do you have any idea how to debug this further? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553121 Title: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt- setup/local0/key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-setup/+bug/1553121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553121] Re: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt-setup/local0/key
** Also affects: apt-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553121 Title: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt- setup/local0/key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-setup/+bug/1553121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553151] Re: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation
Little update: I added the keyboard-configuration/layoutcode=de parameter to the preseed boot kernel command line and got a little bit different result: 1. In lightdm there is only the German keyboard. 2. In a freshly created user there is Germand and English keyboard. That user did not have any home directory before. The content of /etc/default/keyboard did not change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553151 Title: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1553151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553147] Re: xenial preseed cannot set keyboard layout
Testing the German keyboard: Press the key between T and U and it should be Z and not Y :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553147 Title: xenial preseed cannot set keyboard layout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/1553147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553151] Re: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation
BTW, doing a "dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration" and selecting German did not get rid of the English keyboard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553151 Title: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1553151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553151] Re: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation
The kernel options are: biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0 ipv6.disable=1 auto-install/enable=true debconf/priority=critical vga=791 preseed/url=http://jschule.github.io/ubuntu/preseed/jts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553151 Title: Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1553151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553151] [NEW] Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation
Public bug reported:
Using network booted preseed installation with the following lines to
configure keyboard:
d-i console-setup/ask_detect false
d-i keyboard-configuration/layoutcode string de
d-i keyboard-configuration/layout select German
d-i keyboard-configuration/modelcode string pc105
The problem is that after the installation there is a German and also an
English keyboard configured, see attached screenshot.
The /etc/default/keyboard file contains:
XKBMODEL="pc105"
XKBLAYOUT="de"
XKBVARIANT=""
XKBOPTIONS=""
BACKSPACE="guess"
BUT gsettings shows this:
$ gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.input-sources sources
[('xkb', 'de'), ('xkb', 'us')]
I did not touch the X configuration. X log files also don't show
anything, only that de keyboard was set for evdev.
Please advice how to get rid of English keyboard if I configure German
keyboard.
** Affects: installation-guide (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Attachment added: "German and English keyboard layout available"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553151/+attachment/4588255/+files/wily%20german%20and%20english%20keyboard.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553151
Title:
Remove English keyboard layout from preseed installation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-guide/+bug/1553151/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553147] [NEW] xenial preseed cannot set keyboard layout
Public bug reported: Using network booted preseed with the following lines to configure keyboard layout: d-i console-setup/ask_detect false d-i keyboard-configuration/layoutcode string de d-i keyboard-configuration/layout select German d-i keyboard-configuration/modelcode string pc105 System comes up with US keyboard only (see screenshot). Content of /etc/default/keyboard: XKBMODEL="pc105" XKBLAYOUT="" XKBVARIANT="" XKBOPTIONS="" BACKSPACE="guess" Content of /etc/default/console-setup: ACTIVE_CONSOLES="/dev/tty[1-6]" CHARMAP="UTF-8" CODESET="guess" FONTFACE="Fixed" FONTSIZE="8x16" VIDEOMODE= The same preseed file works on wily and successfully configures a German keyboard layout. The full preseed file can be found at https://github.com/jschule/ubuntu/blob/gh-pages/preseed/jts.txt Please advice how to set German keyboard layout with preseed installation. ** Affects: installation-guide (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "content of /etc/default/keyboard and /etc/default/console-setup and output of lsb_release -a" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553147/+attachment/4588254/+files/xenial%20preseed%20cannot%20set%20keyboard%20layout.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553147 Title: xenial preseed cannot set keyboard layout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-guide/+bug/1553147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553121] [NEW] Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt-setup/local0/key
Public bug reported: I have an automated preseed installation that uses these lines to add custom repos during the installation: d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string deb http://jschule.github.io/ubuntu/ / d-i apt-setup/local0/comment string JTS local repository d-i apt-setup/local0/source boolean false d-i apt-setup/local0/key string http://jschule.github.io/ubuntu/repo.key d-i apt-setup/local1/repository string deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main d-i apt-setup/local1/comment string Google Chrome Browser d-i apt-setup/local1/source boolean false d-i apt-setup/local1/key string http://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub (seehttps://github.com/jschule/ubuntu/blob/d46f1cef49ed71dc4bfe317119cccd3f39097ef4/preseed/jts.txt for complete preseed file that causes the problem). In xenial the installation fails because the GPG key for the local0 repo is not loaded into the system so that it can be used (see screenshot). Strangely, "chroot /target apt-key list" shows the key 9E62229E to be installed. Just to be sure that there is no problem with my repo and key I started the Xenial live CD and installed my repo there manually. All works well. IMHO this shows that the problem is clearly related to the automated installation with preseed. Maybe this is related to #1512347, that was the only thing I could find on Launchpad that is in the same area. If you want to reproduce this then you can checkout the scripts from https://github.com/jschule/ubuntu/tree/gh-pages/qemu and run "./run.sh xenial" to start my installation. I found a very ugly workaround by changing the apt-setup lines to this: d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner d-i apt-setup/local0/source boolean false d-i apt-setup/local1/repository string deb http://jschule.github.io/ubuntu/ / d-i apt-setup/local1/comment string JTS local repository d-i apt-setup/local1/source boolean false d-i apt-setup/local1/key string http://jschule.github.io/ubuntu/repo.key d-i apt-setup/local2/repository string deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main d-i apt-setup/local2/comment string Google Chrome Browser d-i apt-setup/local2/source boolean false d-i apt-setup/local2/key string http://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub I suppose that the workaround works because now the local0 repo is one where the signing key is already part of Ubuntu. I just hope that there is no package in the trusty partner repo that is not also in the xenial partner repo. For me it is very important that you fix this bug before 16.04 is released so that I can continue to use Ubuntu with an automated setup. ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "screenshot of failed preseed installation" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553121/+attachment/4588212/+files/xenial%20preseed%20failing%20unauthenticated.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553121 Title: Xenial preseed fails to load key for 3rd party repo with apt- setup/local0/key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/1553121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448942] Re: Juniper Network Connect Tun
Any ETA on an updated kernel package for Vivid? We have about 100 users who cannot upgrade as long as this stays broken :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448942 Title: Juniper Network Connect Tun To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1448942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1407399] Re: loginctl attach fails with DVD drive
It fails both with a single argument (sr0 or sg1) or with both. Attached is the strace ** Attachment added: "strace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407399/+attachment/4384497/+files/strace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407399 Title: loginctl attach fails with DVD drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1407399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442255] [NEW] Update glabels to upstream version
Public bug reported: Upstream version of glabels is 3.2 (see http://glabels.sourceforge.net/download/) while Ubuntu ships 3.0.1, even in upcoming Vivid. Please update to the upstream version. ** Affects: glabels (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442255 Title: Update glabels to upstream version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glabels/+bug/1442255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311316] Re: After locking screen there is no input field to type password for unlock
I have this problem too. Ubuntu 14.10 x86_64 Unity 7.3.1+14.10.20141016-0ubuntu1 Using a multi seat setup (2 users working the same time on different screens connected to different VGA cards). BTW, I use "sudo loginctl unlock-sessions" as a workaround. Very harmful bug and hurts a lot the Wife Acceptance Factor :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311316 Title: After locking screen there is no input field to type password for unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1311316/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
See http://blog.schlomo.schapiro.org/2015/01/ppd-pimp-your-printer- driver.html, I don't know how to get my fix upstream :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411100] Re: guest user not removed after guest session ends
I tried my best - first time doing this on Launchpad so please forgive if I am doing it the wrong way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100 Title: guest user not removed after guest session ends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411100] Re: guest user not removed after guest session ends
It would be nice to see the fix in vivid and utopic, if possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100 Title: guest user not removed after guest session ends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411100] Re: guest user not removed after guest session ends
This patch renames the variables in the remove part of the script so that they cannot conflict with reserved Bash variables -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100 Title: guest user not removed after guest session ends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411100] Re: guest user not removed after guest session ends
Sorry, this is the real patch. ** Patch added: "Patch to use non-conflicting variable names" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+attachment/4298811/+files/guest-account_variable_names.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100 Title: guest user not removed after guest session ends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411100] [NEW] guest user not removed after guest session ends
Public bug reported: The /usr/sbin/giest-account script contains a bug which prevents the removal of guest accounts: $ sudo /usr/sbin/guest-account remove guest-Hhiook /usr/sbin/guest-account: line 129: UID: readonly variable Maybe this is related to /bin/sh actually beeing a Bash: $ ll -d /bin/sh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jan 1 01:44 /bin/sh -> bash* But since using Bash as default sh is still a "feature" of Ubuntu, all scripts should work with both. Running the script with dash actually works: $ sudo dash /usr/sbin/guest-account remove guest-ZWCtva umount: /tmp/guest-ZWCtva: mountpoint not found umount: /tmp/guest-ZWCtva: mountpoint not found Removing user `guest-ZWCtva' ... Warning: group `guest-ZWCtva' has no more members. Done. ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100 Title: guest user not removed after guest session ends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1407399] [NEW] loginctl attach fails with DVD drive
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 14.10 in a multiseat setup I cannot assing the DVD drive to the secondary seat: root@host:~# COLUMNS=300 loginctl seat-status seat0 | grep host ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/ata2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/block/sr0 ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/ata2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/scsi_generic/sg1 root@host:~# loginctl attach seat-1 /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/ata2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/block/sr0 /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/ata2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/scsi_generic/sg1 Failed to issue method call: Invalid argument Assigning USB devices and graphics cards and and sound cards works fine. System and package info: root@host:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.10 Release:14.10 root@host:~# apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 208-8ubuntu8.1 Candidate: 208-8ubuntu8.1 Version table: *** 208-8ubuntu8.1 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ utopic-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 208-8ubuntu8 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ utopic/main amd64 Packages root@host:~# uname -a Linux brho 3.16.0-28-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 12 17:37:40 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux seat-1 exists and has lots of other stuff attached: root@host:~# loginctl seat-status seat-1 seat-1 Sessions: *c3 c2 Devices: ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:01.0/:01:00.0/drm/card1 │ drm:card1 ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:01.0/:01:00.0/graphics/fb1 │ [MASTER] graphics:fb1 "nouveaufb" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-11 │ usb:2-11 │ ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-11/2-11.1 │ │ usb:2-11.1 │ │ └─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-11/2-11.1/2-11.1:1.0/0003:03F0:0024.0003/input/input15 │ │ input:input15 "CHICONY HP Basic USB Keyboard" │ ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-11/2-11.2/2-11.2:1.0/0003:04A5:7008.0004/input/input16 │ │ input:input16 "NOVATEK USB MULTIMEDIA KEYBOARD" │ └─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-11/2-11.2/2-11.2:1.1/0003:04A5:7008.0005/input/input17 │ input:input17 "NOVATEK USB MULTIMEDIA KEYBOARD" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-12/2-12:1.0/0003:046D:C404.0001/input/input6 │ input:input6 "Logitech Trackball" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-8/2-8:1.0/input/input7 │ input:input7 "UVC Camera (046d:0990)" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-8/2-8:1.0/video4linux/video0 │ video4linux:video0 "UVC Camera (046d:0990)" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb2/2-8/2-8:1.2/sound/card1 │ sound:card1 "Q9000" └─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2 sound:card2 "PCH" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input18 │ input:input18 "HDA Intel PCH Front Mic" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input19 │ input:input19 "HDA Intel PCH Rear Mic" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input20 │ input:input20 "HDA Intel PCH Line" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input21 │ input:input21 "HDA Intel PCH Line Out Front" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input22 │ input:input22 "HDA Intel PCH Line Out Surround" ├─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input23 │ input:input23 "HDA Intel PCH Line Out CLFE" └─/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card2/input24 input:input24 "HDA Intel PCH Front Headphone" ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407399 Title: loginctl attach fails with DVD drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1407399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406834] Re: lightdm spawning X servers at high rate on secondary seat in multiseat setup
** Also affects: light-locker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406834 Title: lightdm spawning X servers at high rate on secondary seat in multiseat setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1406834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406834] [NEW] lightdm spawning X servers at high rate on secondary seat in multiseat setup
Public bug reported: OS: XUbuntu 14.10 amd64 with all updates installed. Scenario: Using a multiseat setup with 2 graphics cards. Problem: User on non-primary seat (seat-1) uses xscreensaver to lock screen (light-locker not working correctly). When the screen is in power saving mode lightdm tries to spawn an extra X server at a rate of about 20 per second, apparently to show the greeter which would be used to unlock the session. >From the lightdm.log file: [+38145.59s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Stopping display server, no sessions require it [+38145.59s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Active display server stopped, starting greeter [+38145.59s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Creating greeter session [+38145.59s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Creating display server of type x [+38145.59s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Starting local X display [+38145.59s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/x-2.log [+38145.59s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: Writing X server authority to /var/run/lightdm/root/:2 [+38145.59s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: Launching X Server [+38145.60s] DEBUG: Launching process 22681: /usr/bin/X -core :2 -seat seat-1 -sharevts -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:2 -nolisten tcp [+38145.60s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: Waiting for ready signal from X server :2 [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Process 22681 terminated with signal 6 [+38145.69s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: X server stopped [+38145.69s] DEBUG: DisplayServer x-2: Removing X server authority /var/run/lightdm/root/:2 [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Display server stopped [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Stopping session [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Session stopped [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Stopping display server, no sessions require it [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Active display server stopped, starting greeter [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Creating greeter session [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Creating display server of type x [+38145.69s] DEBUG: Seat seat-1: Starting local X display and so on, filling up the disk with junk logs. >From the corresponding X server log: X.Org X Server 1.16.0 Release Date: 2014-07-16 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux 3.2.0-54-generic x86_64 Ubuntu Current Operating System: Linux brho 3.16.0-28-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 12 17:37:40 UTC 2014 x86_64 Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-28-generic root=UUID=e080193a-c36a-47f5-8f9b-cb8b5528fdd4 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Build Date: 09 December 2014 11:01:03PM xorg-server 2:1.16.0-1ubuntu1.2 (For technical support please see http://www.ubuntu.com/support) Current version of pixman: 0.32.4 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.2.log", Time: Thu Jan 1 01:58:41 2015 (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d" (II) [KMS] Kernel modesetting enabled. (EE) Fatal server error: (EE) no screens found(EE) (EE) Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.2.log" for additional information. (EE) (EE) Server terminated with error (1). Closing log file. and from /var/log/Xorg.2.log: [ 38270.601] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms [ 38270.601] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [ 38270.601] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [ 38270.601] (II) [KMS] Kernel modesetting enabled. [ 38270.601] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting [ 38270.601] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev [ 38270.601] (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw" [ 38270.601] (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw" [ 38270.601] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfbdevhw.so [ 38270.601] (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 38270.601]compiled for 1.16.0, module version = 0.0.2 [ 38270.601]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 18.0 [ 38270.601] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa [ 38270.601] (II) RADEON(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section "Default Screen Section" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 [ 38270.601] (==) RADEON(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32 [ 38270.601] (II) RADEON(0): Pixel depth = 24 bits stored in 4 bytes (32 bpp pixmaps) [ 38270.601] (==) RADEON(0): Default visual is TrueColor [ 38270.601] (==) RADEON(0): RGB weight 888 [ 38270.601] (II) RADEON(0): Using 8 bits per RGB (8 bit DAC) [ 38270.601] (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 3450" (ChipID = 0x95c5) [ 38270.601] (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to set drm interface version. [ 38270.601] (EE) RADEON(0): Kernel modesetting setup failed [ 38270.601] (II) UnloadModule: "radeon" [ 38270.601] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. [ 38270.601] (EE) Fatal server e
[Bug 1385055] [NEW] HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
Public bug reported: Running Ubuntu 14.04 running stock hplip 3.14.3 Printer HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP hp-check -t output is attached Problem: Initially I noticed that printing documents with Hebrew fonts results in low quality with fuzzy lines. After some debugging I was able to trace this down to the fact that by default CUPS converts the print job to a 300dpi PS before giving it to the hp driver: D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Printer make and model: HP HP Officejet Pro X576dw MFP D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for pstops: pstops 261 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'finishings=3 media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color print-quality=4 sides=one-sided job-uuid=urn:uuid:c1da9224-d10b-3c2f-6a99-487121b8864c job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128121 time-at-processing=1414128121 Duplex=None PageSize=A4' D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] No resolution information found in the PPD file. D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Using image rendering resolution 300 dpi D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:01 +0200] [Job 261] Running command line for gs: gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout -dLanguageLevel=3 -r300 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/066575456f596 I was able to fix the problem by adding this resolution setting to the PPD: *DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi As a result the print job is converted at 600dpi instead of 300dpi which leads to the expected good result: D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Printer make and model: HP HP Officejet Pro X576dw MFP D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for pstops: pstops 262 schlomo hebrew-test.pdf 1 'Duplex=None finishings=3 media=iso_a4_210x297mm output-bin=face-down print-color-mode=color print-quality=4 sides=two-sided-long-edge job-uuid=urn:uuid:83e69459-c350-37e5-417d-9ca00f8c6bd9 job-originating-host-name=localhost time-at-creation=1414128153 time-at-processing=1414128153 PageSize=A4' D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Using image rendering resolution 600 dpi D [24/Oct/2014:07:22:33 +0200] [Job 262] Running command line for gs: gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=ps2write -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout -dLanguageLevel=3 -r600 -dCompressFonts=false -dNoT3CCITT -dNOINTERPOLATE -c 'save pop' -f /var/spool/cups/tmp/0666d544aec68 I think that the PPD is broken because it does not specify a resolution. It would be nice if the PPD could be fixed. ** Affects: hplip Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: hplip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Output of hp-check -t" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055/+attachment/4243098/+files/hp-check.txt ** Also affects: hplip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1385055] Re: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
The attached PDF looks very bad when printed in 300dpi and looks good when printed in 600dpi. Somehow this font makes the problem very visible, with latin fonts the difference in quality was less profound. In 300dpi the lines of the letters look ragged and not crisp. ** Attachment added: "test PDF that looks bad in 300dpi" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hplip/+bug/1385055/+attachment/4243099/+files/hebrew-test.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055 Title: HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1385055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1340435] Re: Setting page-set=even and duplex=none results in filter failure
I get exactly the same behaviour! Please fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1340435 Title: Setting page-set=even and duplex=none results in filter failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1340435/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1270090] Re: time-admin can not install ntp
Really nice that the LTS Ubuntu does not support NTP any more ... manually installing ntp helped, but it should be simpler than that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270090 Title: time-admin can not install ntp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/1270090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125097] Re: forces removal of virtualbox-4.2
Please remove the version requirement from the Recommends. Any recent distro will have at least virtualbox => 4.0 so that this version is not neccessary, strictly speaking. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125097 Title: forces removal of virtualbox-4.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1125097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242185] Re: [regression] cups-daemon hard-depends on avahi-daemon
3 months and nothing happens? Please fix the init script of cups. Some people don't want to be forced to run avahi! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242185 Title: [regression] cups-daemon hard-depends on avahi-daemon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1242185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053749] Re: UnicodeDecodeError from broken package descriptions
Extremely annoying. I can imagine that most "users" actually have no chance of fixing this! My problem is that the error remains evean after fixing the bad davmail packager. Any ideas what else to check? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053749 Title: UnicodeDecodeError from broken package descriptions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1053749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919109] Re: No tray icon in Unity
This also affects precise. At https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=983924&aid=3349215&group_id=203022 (blueproximity homepage patch tracker) there is a patch that is supposed to fix this issue, unfortunately it does not apply cleanly and apparently needs some rework. ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3349215 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3349215 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919109 Title: No tray icon in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueproximity/+bug/919109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445487] Re: Network-Manager fails WPA2 Enterprise configuration
Did some more tests with a new p12 certificate and it works! The only thing that I can tell now is that you have to fill in all fields in the settings dialogue (also the ID). So far I only can tell sorry for my previous entry, should have done more testing before posting. My configuration: Ubuntu 10.10 maverick with these package versions: $ dpkg -l | grep -E '(network-manager|wpa)' ii network-manager 0.8.1+git.20100810t184654.ab580f4-0ubuntu2 ii network-manager-gnome 0.8.1+git.20100809t190028.290dc70-0ubuntu3 ii network-manager-pptp 0.8.1+git.20100810t192516.1e6db5a-0ubuntu1 ii network-manager-pptp-gnome 0.8.1+git.20100810t192516.1e6db5a-0ubuntu1 ii wpasupplicant 0.6.10-2 We will now start a roll-out with .p12 certificates and TLS, I will report back if any new issues arise. -- Network-Manager fails WPA2 Enterprise configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445487] Re: Network-Manager fails WPA2 Enterprise configuration
We also have this issue with our corporate network (both lucid and maverick). It really is a showstopper because Ubuntu users cannot use their laptops without a network cable. This actually prevented several people from migrating their Windows laptop to Ubuntu because they use their laptop 80% in conference rooms and cannot work without the wireless connection to the corporate network. Please make this a major bug and fix it ASAP, I will be happy to do the testing. -- Network-Manager fails WPA2 Enterprise configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 294977] Re: not clear how to configure with pam-auth-update
I would like to see this backported to lucid because I had to use auth- client-config to configure libpam-ccreds and I got lots of problems with pam-auth-update overwriting the common-* files each time a new pam module gets installed. -- not clear how to configure with pam-auth-update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 610774] [NEW] pam-auth-update profile for pam-group missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-runtime There is no pam-auth-update profile for pam_group.so This makes it very difficult to actually make use of pam_group.so because even if I add it to /etc/pam.d/common-auth I cannot make use of pam-auth-update any more. This means that instead of relying on pam- auth-update to manage my PAM stack I will have to do it all manually once I start using pam_group.so IMHO pam-auth-update is a great invention and I hope that it will soon become the standard tool for this task. However, a logical consequence of inventing pam-auth-update is in my opinion to supply profiles for common PAM modules. I therefore would like to suggest to break out pam_group.so from libpam- runtime into a package of its own (libpam-group) which would bring the PAM module and the corresponding pam-auth-update profile. A user wishing to use pam_group.so would then be able to simply install libpam-group and have the pam_group.so module enabled automatically through pam-auth-update in the postinst script of libpam-group. ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pam-auth-update profile for pam-group missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608930] Re: libnss-ldap needlessly (and indirectly) depend on libpam-ldap
I am the original reporter of this bug... IMHO it is also wrong that libnss-ldap depends on ldap-auth-client. ldap-auth-client (correctly) depends on both libpam-ldap and libnss-ldap so that a user wishing to install "regular" LDAP authentication can use ldap-auth-client to activate both. But the software in libnss-ldap does not need the software in ldap-auth- client! Therefore it is a bug and this dependency should be removed. Maybe somebody added it as a convenience, but is actually wrong and should be removed. IMHO a correct dependency tree should look like this: ldap-auth-client -> libpam-ldap -> libnss-ldap -> auth-client-config (suggests) There should be no other dependencies between the other packages as they serve no purpose I can see. -- libnss-ldap needlessly (and indirectly) depend on libpam-ldap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
