[Bug 174759] Re: Eclipse crashes due to jvm crash

2008-04-25 Thread Scott Van Wart
> I'm switching to fedora.

I can appreciate the frustration, but let's not get nuts.

:)

-- 
Eclipse crashes due to jvm crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174759
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 154613] Re: Xinerama prevents Java fullscreen exclusive mode in Gutsy

2008-04-23 Thread Scott Van Wart
I get something of an error regardless which JVM I use (I used java6,
java5, and downloaded 1.4.2 directly from Sun).  I'm not sure exactly
how related this is, but I get other problems (I have a Java app whose
Oracle JDBC driver can't even do a simple connect to a database).  The
JVM doesn't CRASH, but it does have a few xinerama references in the
stack trace.  I don't know if this is related to bug #174759 or not, but
see attachment in case it rings any bells.

** Attachment added: "Error appearing in stdout occasionally while running a 
Java app"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13839426/assertion_failure.txt

-- 
Xinerama prevents Java fullscreen exclusive mode in Gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 174759] Re: Eclipse crashes due to jvm crash

2008-04-23 Thread Scott Van Wart
The IBM Java6 SDK doesn't trigger this bug, so if you can live with that
in the time being, it seems a good substitute until this gets fixed.

-- 
Eclipse crashes due to jvm crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174759
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 206620] Re: JVM utterly unstable with Eclipse 3.2.2/3.3 on x86_64

2008-04-18 Thread Scott Van Wart
I'm inclined to agree with Vittorio.  I get the same problem with Hardy
using an x64 JDK downloaded directly from Sun (1.6.0_06).

-- 
JVM utterly unstable with Eclipse 3.2.2/3.3 on x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206620
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 82314] Re: pata driver in libata not mounting /home

2007-04-06 Thread Scott Van Wart
I'm seeing those messages, but nothing related to host protected area.
So should I be using the old drivers, or open a new bug report for this?

-- 
pata driver in libata not mounting /home
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82314

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 82314] Re: pata driver in libata not mounting /home

2007-03-27 Thread Scott Van Wart
It seems it boots successfully sometimes, but that (I think) depends on
the order the devices are enumerated.  I grabbed a dmesg of both a fail
and success, and spotted a couple of differences (if it helps)--note I
don't see any line about HPA, yet the old ide driver detects it (Host
Protected Area detected, followed by disabled) so I apparently do have
it... (- is fail, + is successful boot):

-ata1.00: 78125000 sectors, multi 16: LBA 
+ata1.00: 80043264 sectors, multi 16: LBA 

-SCSI device sda: 78125000 512-byte hdwr sectors (4 MB)
+SCSI device sda: 80043264 512-byte hdwr sectors (40982 MB)

-SCSI device sda: 78125000 512-byte hdwr sectors (4 MB)
+SCSI device sda: 80043264 512-byte hdwr sectors (40982 MB)

- sda: p3 exceeds device capacity
-attempt to access beyond end of device
-sda: rw=0, want=80043080, limit=78125000
-Buffer I/O error on device sda3, logical block 9864768

Besides the obvious disk size discrepancy, the only other noticable
difference is that my network card gets initialized BEFORE the ATA
driver in the successful bootand AFTER the ATA driver in the failed
boot... so maybe it's an ACPI issue?

HTH, I see Kyle mentioned testers a couple of weeks ago, I'm not sure if
that's what was in mind :).

-- 
pata driver in libata not mounting /home
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82314

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 82314] Re: pata driver in libata not mounting /home

2007-03-26 Thread Scott Van Wart
This is the only bug I could find that I thought might be related to my
issue. I was going to try blacklisting the ata drivers as suggested
above, but I'm not sure how to include all the necessary ones to get the
old IDE driver (for now).  I started having problems with 2.6.20-12,
though -11 works fine.  Like other symptoms reported here, it's
detecting my devices as SCSI sda devices rather than the usual hda
stuff, and I'm not sure whether this is an issue or by design, but -12
and -13 won't boot.

I managed to get a dmesg with -12 as /boot (hda1, though it saw it as
sda1) managed to mount properly.  I was getting warnings with -13, but I
don't care, there's nothing valuable on this machine :).  Cheers.

-Scott

** Attachment added: "3 dmesg from 2.6.20-{13,12,11} (in that order)"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6991211/tmp.txt

-- 
pata driver in libata not mounting /home
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82314

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92730] Re: Sudoku thought I was finished, but I wasn't (1 cell left)

2007-03-15 Thread Scott Van Wart
1 - See screenshot
2 - Cleared the erroneous 2 in row 4, column 7 by clicking on it, and clicking 
on the Clear button.
3 - Cleared the top-most '1' hint.
4 - Cleared the remaining '1' hint.
5 - Filled in a '1' in row 5, column 7.
6 - Cleared the remaining '5' hint.
7 - BUG: High scores popped up.

After clicking OK, I was taken to the "Select Game" screen. I clicked
Cancel, and was brought back to my unfinished game. I could Undo/Redo
all I wanted to, and even reproduce the problem as many times as I
wanted. When I filled the remaining square with a '3' nothing happened.

Cheers!

** Attachment added: "Screenshot after entering incorrect value."
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6838667/Screenshot-GNOME%20Sudoku.png

-- 
Sudoku thought I was finished, but I wasn't (1 cell left)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92730

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92730] Sudoku thought I was finished, but I wasn't (1 cell left)

2007-03-15 Thread Scott Van Wart
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-games

I had 3 cells left before the puzzle was complete.  I accidentally
filled the wrong one, so I cleared it.  Then I filled one of the
remaining 3, then a second one.  I still had one empty cell left (the
one that was cleared earlier), but the high scores popped up.

I'm hoping after this I can attach a screenshot, so bear with me :).

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:17:05 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
Uname: Linux jacodax 2.6.20-11-generic #2 SMP Thu Mar 15 08:03:07 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux

** Affects: gnome-games (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Sudoku thought I was finished, but I wasn't (1 cell left)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92730

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 72093] Wrong cookie path in default configuration

2006-11-16 Thread Scott Van Wart
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: horde3

Cookies don't work out-of-box with horde3.  The default documentation
suggests using the following line in the apache configuration:

Alias /horde3 /usr/share/horde3

However, the default cookie path in conf.php is set to "/horde", without
the trailing 3.

** Affects: horde3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Wrong cookie path in default configuration
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72093

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs