[Bug 1301225] Re: Parts of Text disappear in Firefox and Thunderbird Editors /Text Areas

2014-12-01 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I observed this bug in the previous LTS release (12.04?) and I confirm
it is still here in Ubuntu 14.04.1 (Thunderbird 31.2.0).

System details:
x86_64
nvidia graphics, nouveau driver
KDE enviroment
Happened in both Thunderbird and Firefox in Ubuntu 12.04. Under 14.04.1, I 
observed this bug in Thunderbird but not (yet?) in Firefox. 

Don't know how to reproduce it reliably, but it happens sufficiently often to 
be annoying.
When it happens, I usually force a window refresh by switching to another 
(fullscreen) window and back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301225

Title:
  Parts of Text disappear in Firefox and Thunderbird Editors /Text Areas

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1301225/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 663224] [NEW] grep does not work with 8-bit characters in bracket expressions

2010-10-19 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: grep

A command like grep '[abcd]', but with 8-bit charaters in place of
[abcd], does not work properly. It fails to match anything.

Why I care: constructions like this are used when building rus-ispell
packages (Russian dictionaries for spell checkers) in order to generate
variants of use of the Cyriilic Yo letter. Because of this bug, the
resulting dictionaries are incomplete.

Test script:
===
#!/bin/sh
LANG=C  
LC_ALL=C
export LANG LC_ALL  
printf '\100' | grep -c `printf '\100'` -   
printf '\100' | grep -c `printf '[\100]'` - 
printf '\200' | grep -c `printf '\200'` -   
printf '\200' | grep -c `printf '[\200]'` - 
===

Output:
1
1
1
0

Expected output:
1
1
1
1


Version information:

~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10

~$ apt-cache policy grep
grep:
  Installed: 2.6.3-3
  Candidate: 2.6.3-3
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.3-3 0
500 http://ru.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: grep (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
grep does not work with 8-bit characters in bracket expressions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663224
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286014] Re: kde print ignores duplex copy options

2009-11-05 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Have this bug on Kubuntu 9.10 with KDE 4.3.3 from PPA (okular never
prints more than one copy). But kate and Konqueror *do* print several
copies when asked to. It seems that on this system the bug is specific
to okular.

-- 
kde print ignores duplex  copy options
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286014
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 471446] Re: qemu segfaults with a -cpu option

2009-11-02 Thread Sergei Ivanov

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973392/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973393/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973394/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973395/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973396/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973398/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973399/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973400/RelatedPackageVersions.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973401/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973402/UdevLog.txt

-- 
qemu segfaults with a -cpu option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471446
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 471446] [NEW] qemu segfaults with a -cpu option

2009-11-02 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: qemu-kvm

When I run `qemu -cpu pentium' or `qemu -cpu 486' or similar, it segfaults 
immediately (a qemu window appears for a brief moment, then it dies). If I add 
-no-kvm to the command line, it starts normally.
The host system is x86_64, intel CPU with virtualization support.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Nov  2 21:11:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027)
KvmCmdLine: Error: command ['ps', '-C', 'kvm', '-F'] failed with exit code 1: 
UIDPID  PPID  CSZ   RSS PSR STIME TTY  TIME CMD
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: qemu-kvm 0.11.0-0ubuntu6
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic 
root=UUID=adec7cda-cd1d-4094-909d-74be94cfdc6b ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: qemu-kvm
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors: (npviewer.bin:1638): Gtk-WARNING **: 
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libqtcurve.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
dmi.bios.date: 10/12/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
dmi.bios.version: CL94510J.86A.0012.2006.1012.1835
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: D945GCL
dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
dmi.board.version: AAD67193-205
dmi.chassis.type: 2
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrCL94510J.86A.0012.2006.1012.1835:bd10/12/2006:svn:pn:pvr:rvnIntelCorporation:rnD945GCL:rvrAAD67193-205:cvn:ct2:cvr:

** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
qemu segfaults with a -cpu option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471446
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 471446] [NEW] qemu segfaults with a -cpu option

2009-11-02 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: qemu-kvm

When I run `qemu -cpu pentium' or `qemu -cpu 486' or similar, it segfaults 
immediately (a qemu window appears for a brief moment, then it dies). If I add 
-no-kvm to the command line, it starts normally.
The host system is x86_64, intel CPU with virtualization support.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Nov  2 21:11:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027)
KvmCmdLine: Error: command ['ps', '-C', 'kvm', '-F'] failed with exit code 1: 
UIDPID  PPID  CSZ   RSS PSR STIME TTY  TIME CMD
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: qemu-kvm 0.11.0-0ubuntu6
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic 
root=UUID=adec7cda-cd1d-4094-909d-74be94cfdc6b ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: qemu-kvm
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors: (npviewer.bin:1638): Gtk-WARNING **: 
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libqtcurve.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
dmi.bios.date: 10/12/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
dmi.bios.version: CL94510J.86A.0012.2006.1012.1835
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: D945GCL
dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
dmi.board.version: AAD67193-205
dmi.chassis.type: 2
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrCL94510J.86A.0012.2006.1012.1835:bd10/12/2006:svn:pn:pvr:rvnIntelCorporation:rnD945GCL:rvrAAD67193-205:cvn:ct2:cvr:

** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
qemu segfaults with a -cpu option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471446
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 471446] Re: qemu segfaults with a -cpu option

2009-11-02 Thread Sergei Ivanov

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973392/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973393/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973394/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973395/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973396/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973398/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973399/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973400/RelatedPackageVersions.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973401/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34973402/UdevLog.txt

-- 
qemu segfaults with a -cpu option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471446
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456432] Re: konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off

2009-10-20 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I fixed this by adding the following lines to konsole's keytab file
(patch taken from 
http://stochastic-randomness.blogspot.com/2009/08/konsole-numpad-fix-for-kde4.html):

# Keypad keys with NumLock Off
key Up -Shift+Ansi+AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOA
key Down -Shift+Ansi+AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOB
key Right -Shift+Ansi+AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOC
key Left -Shift+Ansi+AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOD

key Up -Shift+Ansi-AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[A
key Down -Shift+Ansi-AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[B
key Right -Shift+Ansi-AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[C
key Left -Shift+Ansi-AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[D

key Home +AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOH
key End +AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \EOF
key Home -AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[H
key End -AppCuKeys+KeyPad : \E[F

key Insert +KeyPad : \E[2~
key Delete +KeyPad : \E[3~
key Prior -Shift+KeyPad : \E[5~
key Next -Shift+KeyPad : \E[6~

-- 
konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456432] [NEW] konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off

2009-10-20 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: konsole

I have kubuntu karmik beta installed on a Toshiba L505 laptop. This
laptop has a full 104-keys keyboard with a numeric keypad section and a
numlock key. In konsole, the keypad keys do not work when numlock is
off.  They seem to be completely ignored.

When numlock is on, they produce digits as expected. Even with numlock
off,  keypad keys with ctrl or alt produce some escape sequences, but
without modifiers they do not.

Other applications (I checked xterm, konqueror and firefox) do not have
this problem. The keypad also works normally in a console VT.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 20 11:20:44 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/kdeinit4
Package: kdelibs-bin 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu7
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: kde4libs
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: kdebase (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456432] Re: konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off

2009-10-20 Thread Sergei Ivanov

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34046747/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34046748/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34046750/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
konsole ignores keypad when numlock is off
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456012] [NEW] ksysguard spawns hordes of zombies

2009-10-19 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ksysguard

I have ksysguard but no ksysguardd installed. When I run ksysguard, it
shows a process table. In a short period of time, this table is full of
zombie ksysguard processes. There is one living process and it keeps
spawning more and more zombies. After 2 minutes (wall clock), the
command `ps ax | grep ksysguard | wc -l' shows more than 240 of these
beasts, so it's approximately 2 new zombies per second. Luckily they all
die when the ksysguard window is closed.

This is kubuntu karmik beta, ksysguard version is 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu6.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Oct 19 23:30:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/ksysguard
Package: ksysguard 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu6
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: kdebase-workspace
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
ksysguard spawns hordes of zombies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456012] Re: ksysguard spawns hordes of zombies

2009-10-19 Thread Sergei Ivanov

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34007074/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34007075/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34007076/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
ksysguard spawns hordes of zombies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 451748] Re: unused filesystem modules are loaded

2009-10-15 Thread Sergei Ivanov
The issue disappeared after a number of updates and I cannot reproduce
it any longer. Sorry for the noise.

For the record: since my report, I reinstalled the system  keeping an
eye on the modules among other things. After installation from CD,
everything was ok. Then, after a massive upgrade from the repo, the
modules were loaded (and were still there after a reboot). Then, after
some installations and removals of packages, the issue disappeared. I
still can trigger loading of all filesystem modules by reinstalling
grub-pc, but they do not survive a reboot.

-- 
unused filesystem modules are loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 451748] [NEW] unused filesystem modules are loaded

2009-10-14 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: initramfs-tools

After booting current kubuntu karmik beta, lsmod shows the following:

Module  Size  Used by
ufs76904  0
qnx4   10536  0
hfsplus81032  0
hfs50152  0
minix  33168  0
ntfs  101792  0
vfat   13184  0
msdos   9664  0
fat59832  2 vfat,msdos
jfs   190160  0
xfs   535136  0
exportfs5472  1 xfs
reiserfs  247720  0
[...]

I have only ntfs, ext3 and ext4 filesystems on this machine, and only
ext4 is mounted. The rest of the above modules just sits there and eats
the non-swappable kernel memory. I'm sure they contribute to boot time
as well. And who knows whether the code from these modules is running or
not.

I expect that modules for non-existing stuff are not loaded, and this
was the case in Ubuntu 8.04 (I did not check anything in between).
However cheap the memory is these days, I still think that the issue is
worth fixing.

I'm not sure that it is the initramfs-tools package that is responsible
for this, but anyway its version is 0.92bubuntu53.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Oct 14 18:47:19 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu53
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.46-generic
SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
unused filesystem modules are loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 451748] Re: unused filesystem modules are loaded

2009-10-14 Thread Sergei Ivanov

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33685557/Dependencies.txt

-- 
unused filesystem modules are loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 48146] Re: Poor font rendering in kpdf

2009-05-27 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 Is this also the cause of the poor fonts I get in Okular with my tex-
 generated documents? If not I will start another bug thread.

I did not test the patch with okular, I'm still using KDE3.

 If it is, I wonder what file I should apply the patch to. I don't have
 the SplashFTFont.cc file. I'm using Ubuntu and Gnome.

It's in another package named poppler (it is a library that kpdf and
okular use).

-- 
Poor font rendering in kpdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2009-04-28 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Monday 27 April 2009, Charles Atkinson wrote:
 In bootlogd.c, there is a while loop starting at line 585 and ending at
 line 664.  Each iteration it reads from the intercepted console output,
 writes what it gets to the console and either buffers it or writes it to
 logfile.  What is the access() function on line 643?  Lines 648 and 651
 try to open logfile in append mode, creating it if it does not exist.
 As I understand it this should fail until there is a writeable /var/log
 directory.  If that is correct then it should work ... ?
 

I think it should work as you expect (but I never tried this kind of
configuration).

Are you sure that it is non-writable /var that breaks it? For example, can you 
mount
root (with /var) read-write from the very beginning and see if this works?

Keep in mind that one of my patches changed the name of the log file,
it is /var/log/boot, not /var/log/bootmsg. Make sure this file exists or
call bootlogd with the -c option.

What is the status of bootlogd at the end of the boot sequence? Is it alive?
If yes, can you check what it is doing? What files it has opened (see 
/proc/*/fd)?

Does it work if started later? If yes, I suggest you bisect it and find the 
exact point
after which it starts working. It might be mounting of /dev, for example.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2009-03-14 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Saturday 14 March 2009, Charles Atkinson wrote:
 I expected this change to cause some breakage; perhaps bootlogd depended
 on something set by the earlier boot scripts; why would the package
 designers not start it right at the beginning of the boot process so it
 could capture all the boot messages?

It may work or not depending on the system. The program uses
pseudo-terminals (PTYs). If you have BSD PTYs compiled in the kernel
and have static pty* devices in your root filesystem, then yes,
it should be possible to run bootlogd right from the beginning
(perhaps even from the initial ramdisk). If not, you have to wait until
/dev/pts is mounted by S11mountdevsubfs.sh.

Best regards,
Sergei

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 48146] Re: Poor font rendering in kpdf

2008-12-18 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I fond the origin of the problem and a solution. The rendering propblem
occurs when you have all of the following:

1. TrueType bytecode interpreter enabled in the freetype library. (This
is a compile-time option which is off by default due to patent issues,
Ubuntu turns it on while Fedora does not.)

2. Kpdf using anti-aliasing. (No idea where this is configured, maybe
from the global KDE setting).

3. A pdf file with embedded bitmapped (or maybe any non-TrueType) fonts.
This is typical for pdfs generated by TeX.

When all of this happens, kpdf uses its own (or KDE's) anti-aliasing
*and* freetype's autohinting. Each of the features is supposed to
improve the view but their combination works poorly.

A solution is to turn off the check for bytecode interpreter in kpdf. On
Ubuntu, this piece of code actually lives in libpoppler which is a
separate package. The attached patch to poppler fixes the problem for
me. I don't know if it breaks something else. I checked evince and it
does not seem to be affected.

The same file is present in kpdf source. It should be patched there if
kpdf is compiled without poppler.


** Attachment added: disable freetype's autohinting when anti-aliasing
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20554242/hinting.patch

-- 
Poor font rendering in kpdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 48146] Re: Poor font rendering in kpdf

2008-12-17 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I observe this bug too, both in kpdf (hardy) and okular (intrepid).
Rendering is especially bad for Cyrillic fonts in pdfs generated by TeX
(I guess this is because these fonts are bitmapped) but the problem
is visible with latin fonts too. This bug annoyed me for a long time and
I spent some time investigating it (with KDE3 on hardy)

Rendering is good in Opensuse 10.3 and in Fedora 8. I narrowed the difference
down to the file /usr/lib/kde3/libkpdfpart.so. Copying this file from Fedora to 
Ubuntu
fixes the problem.

I thought that the difference is due to compile-time options or patches but
this is not the case. I compiled kdegraphics-3.5.10 (the upstream source
with no patches) via 'configure  make' on the two systems.
On Fedora, this compilation produced a good binary. On Ubuntu, it produced a 
bad binary.
(The binaries were tested by copying the file libkpdfpart.so to the Ubuntu 
system
and running kpdf, so it's not a matter of not having some library in the 
system).

I am trying to investigate the issue futher. Does anyone know what can possibly 
cause
this surprising effect?

-- 
Poor font rendering in kpdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 188950] Re: kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset

2008-10-28 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Richard Birnie wrote:
 I still haven't managed to reproduce this. KDE3.5.10 has now been
 released. Does this problem still occur for you?
 

Yes, it still inserts a space when I add ibm866 in 
Settings-Composer-Charset,
and it this space can occur in the outgoing mail.

I am pretty sure that this bug is in QT. I have libqt3-mt version 
3.3.8-b-0ubuntu3
installed at the moment, you may have some better version.

Back then, I grepped the sources for ibm 866 with a space and found an 
occurence
in some table within QT sources but nowhere in KDE. I even made a patch (see 
below)
and I think it worked then. Then I forgot about it, and then some apt-get 
upgrade
killed it (sigh)... Sorry for not reporting this fact until now.

--- qt-x11-free-3.3.8really3.3.7/src/codecs/qtextcodec.cpp.-space
+++ qt-x11-free-3.3.8really3.3.7/src/codecs/qtextcodec.cpp
@@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@
 0x0E48, 0x0E49, 0x0E4A, 0x0E4B, 0x0E4C, 0x0E4D, 0x0E4E, 0x0E4F,
 0x0E50, 0x0E51, 0x0E52, 0x0E53, 0x0E54, 0x0E55, 0x0E56, 0x0E57,
 0x0E58, 0x0E59, 0x0E5A, 0x0E5B, 0xFFFD, 0xFFFD, 0xFFFD, 0xFFFD} },
-{ IBM 866, IBM 866, 2086,
+{ IBM866, IBM 866, 2086,
   { 0x0410, 0x0411, 0x0412, 0x0413, 0x0414, 0x0415, 0x0416, 0x0417,
 0x0418, 0x0419, 0x041A, 0x041B, 0x041C, 0x041D, 0x041E, 0x041F,
 0x0420, 0x0421, 0x0422, 0x0423, 0x0424, 0x0425, 0x0426, 0x0427,

-- 
kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 188950] Re: kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset

2008-09-25 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Richard Birnie wrote:
 Do you still observe this bug in more recent versions of kmail?

Yes I still observe it in hardy.

 I just tried to reproduce this in both hardy and intrepid both with
kde4 and kmail 1.10.1

For some reason, the version I am using is older:

~$ kmail --version
Qt: 3.3.8b
KDE: 3.5.9
KMail: 1.9.9

The kmail package version (as shown by aptitude) is 4:3.5.9-0ubuntu3.

However aptitude does not show any upgradable packages.
Do I miss some repository to upgrade from?

-- 
kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-08-05 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 i cant make the buffer big enough to log it all. my boot process takes
 23 seconds and the biggest buffer that i can get to work is 975kb
 (999,999 bytes) which will only log 18 seconds.

This is a strange constant. The 32-bit integer overflows near 2Gb.
What is wrong with larger values? Doesn't the program compile,
or doesn't it start?

Do you measure the 18 seconds by the wall clock or by the timestamps
in the log file?

I'm not a great expert in bootlogd, but I thought that the internal buffer
is used until /var is writeable, then it writes directly to the file.

So if a buffer in bootlogd overflows *after* /var is made writeable,
then this is a bug in bootlogd. Otherwise there is no way other than
enlarging the buffer - it has to remember the messages somewhere
until the disk is ready.

 also is there a way to 
 log the shutdown messages?

This is hard. You cannot save anything after the filesystems are unmounted.
I've heard of someone who used a video camera to record screen messages.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-08-04 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 i installed Sergei's version and it works but it only captures 3 seconds
 of my boot messages, how can i fix this?

Is there a lot of text to capture? If so, it might overflow the internal 32K 
buffer.
It is defined on line 52 in bootlogd.c. Try to increase it.

Also, there is a stop-bootlogd script which stops bootlogd near the end of boot
sequence. Check when this script is run.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-04-30 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 Can you give me layman steps of how to install your package?

This is a Debian source package. It is meant to be installed using 
dpkg-related tools, not with make; make install.
A recipe was there in the post where I announced the package.
Here it is again:

 # unpack the source
tar xzvf bootlogd_2.86.02.tar.gz
 # build the package
cd bootlogd-2.86.02
debuild -us -uc -b
cd ..
 # install the package
sudo dpkg -i bootlogd_2.86.02_*.deb

As for the compilation warning, it looks harmless.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 155490] Re: [gutsy] Screensavers don't start automatically in Kubuntu

2008-02-12 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I have a similar behavior with just two of the screensavers: kswarm and
kspace. They can be started by the Test button in the Configure
Desctop - Screen Saver menu, but not automatically. After the timeout,
the mouse cursor disappears, the panel clock freezes, but otherwise
nothing happens on the screen. This is a desktop machine running current
Kubuntu Gutsy (32bit). I don't use screen locking. The behavior is the
same with intel and nvidia drivers. Adding DPMS-dependent=false does not
help.

Other screensavers that I tried (kclock, klines and some others) do
work.

-- 
[gutsy] Screensavers don't start automatically in Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155490
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 188950] [NEW] kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset

2008-02-04 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

Kmail composer understands the ibm866 charset but uses ibm 866 (with
a space!) as its name in outgoing mail. This is incorrect, and other
mail clients are confused by this space. I was hit by this when I
received a mail with charset=ibm866, replied to it, and recipients could
not read the reply because Kmail tried to use the same charset when
replying but wrote 'charset=ibm 866' in the header.

To reproduce:

In Kmail, go to Settings - Composer - Charset, try to add ibm866 to
the list. It adds ibm 866 instead.

Or, alternatively:

Make sure the option Keep original charset when replying ... (in the same 
menu) is checked.
Get a mail with charset=ibm866 (for example, create a simple ascii mail and 
edit Content-Type: field by hand).
Reply to this mail and view the reply as plain text. It has

Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=ibm 866

The clients that cannot read this include (some versions of)
SquirrelMail, MS Outlook Express, The Bat.

I am using Gutsy, kmail version is 4:3.5.7enterprise20070926-0ubuntu2. Output 
of kmail --version is:
Qt: 3.3.7
KDE: 3.5.8
KMail: 1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)

** Affects: kdepim (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
kmail composer uses wrong name for ibm866 charset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for kdepim in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 184675] Re: kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning

2008-01-29 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
 My bad, I installed through upgrade and didn't notice that kdelibs4c2a
 was held back. Yes, I can confirm that it works (using
 4:3.5.8-4ubuntu6), I'm subscribing u-m-s in case they care to include
 this with the next update, but note that this was fixed for KDE 4
 (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146300).

Thanks. I hope KDE3 will be packaged and supported for a while (at this stage 
KDE4
is far from being usable for real work).

-- 
kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184675] Re: kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning

2008-01-28 Thread Sergei Ivanov
If my copy-pasting broke the patch, see the attached one here. It still works 
for me, now with kdelibs-3.5.8-0ubuntu3.2.
I apply it before running anything from debian/rules. Here is what I do:

apt-get source kdelibs
patch -d kdelibs-3.5.8 -p1  newline.patch
cd kdelibs-3.5.8
debuild -us -uc -b
sudo dpkg -i kdelibs4c2a_3.5.8-0ubuntu3.2_i386.deb

Note that the affected fragment is in some obscure shared library which
may be loaded via dlopen(). If you install the new version in
/usr/local, the old one could still be used. It also makes sense to
restart KDE to get rid of preloaded stuff (it works for me without
restarting but generally KDE does not support live upgrading).


** Attachment added: newline.patch
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11600097/newline.patch

-- 
kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-27 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 Yes, I sure understand that you don't want to be a maintainer for it, that
 would probably be quite a lot of work. For me the [ok] comes on it's own
 separate:
 Sun Jan 27 21:52:32 2008:  * Starting system message bus dbus
 Sun Jan 27 21:52:32 2008: [ OK ]
 
 Is this intentional? Otherwise this seems much nicer than before.

Well, bootlogd *has* a maintainer, it's Debian sysvinit team. Maybe I'll send 
the fixes
there some day.

The OK placement is yes, sort of intentional. They use a lot of terminal 
trickery to make
output look better, and logging it correctly would require many changes to the 
code.
I had to choose from a couple of simple rules, and the other choices led to 
worse results.
After all, this OK is a separate message and its timing may be useful.

You can make it appear on the same line by changing the source as follows.
Go to bootlog.c line 361, there will be a part of switch like this:

case '\n':
case '\r:
   ...

Change it to:

case '\r':
break;
case '\n':
   ...

(that is, interchange the two cases and insert break; between them).
But then you will lose, among other things, the summary of a long fsck run
(it will be truncated as a part of one extra long line).

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-26 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I am not willing to maintain it seriously, it is too system-dependent.
Nevertheless, here is a new version. Changes are:

- Improved logfile formatting.
- The logfile is renamed to /var/log/bootmsg, to avoid conflict with logd in 
the future.

Again, please do not install it blindly. You cannot be sure that I am
not giving you a trojan.


** Attachment added: bootlogd_2.86.02.tar.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11578525/bootlogd_2.86.02.tar.gz

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177923] Re: some monospace fonts are not monospace

2008-01-25 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Sorry, I just discovered that email attachments do not work in launchpad.
Including that screenshot now.


** Attachment added: snapshot3.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11569621/snapshot3.png

-- 
some monospace fonts are not monospace
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-25 Thread Sergei Ivanov
To  tekknokrat. You can try out the attached source package.
This is bootlogd alone, separated from gutsy's sysvinit.
I fixed logging of  terminal codes and some other minor issues.
It works for me here (Ubuntu stock kernel, no usplash, no mounting of /var).
You can build and install it with the following commands:

tar xzvf bootlogd_2.86.01.tar.gz  # unpack the source
cd bootlogd-2.86.01
debuild -us -uc -b   # build the package
cd ..
sudo dpkg -i bootlogd_2.86.01_*.deb  # install the package

Please note that I am not an Ubuntu developer and the package is not
official in any way. So it is a good measure to audit it before installing. 

In the long run, I agree that we should wait for a boot logging support
in upstart. Doing such things properly may require cooperation with
the rest of the init system.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-25 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I did attach it! Maybe launchpad does not allow this via email.
Now I am trying to do this using the web interface.


** Attachment added: bootlogd_2.86.01.tar.gz (unofficial package)
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11569042/bootlogd_2.86.01.tar.gz

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-24 Thread Sergei Ivanov
 I think there is a good reason that they are not using bootlogd by
 default. I think I read somewhere that bootlogd is quite buggy on some
 systems, and it is hard to make it work correctly the way it is
 designed. So the proper fix in the long run would be to redesign it
 completely, as Scott is intending to do with logd in the future. I don't
 remember where I read this however... Probably tekknokrat ran into one
 of those problems.

No, that error (cannot find console device 136:1) means that bootlogd
was run from a terminal emulator (xterm or screen or mc or  ... ).
It must be run from a real console device.

Passing console=/dev/console to the kernel is an error. I think the correct
value is /dev/tty0 or /dev/tty1. And bootlogd will use something like this
anyway.

I have another problem with  bootlogd. It gets confused by terminal
control codes (those that make screen output prettier). I'll try to look
at the source and see what can be done.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184675] kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning

2008-01-20 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

This was already reported as bug #146306 (which is closed as
unreproducible). I have this issue on Gutsy with current kdelibs
(kdelibs4c2a-3.5.8-0ubuntu3.1).

To reproduce: run Kate on a file with more lines than kate's window has
(this is essential), then hit Enter at the beginning of the file. Kate
inserts a line but does not display it (until you hit Uparrow or
something similar).

This also happens if it is not the beginning of the file but the
beginning of the visible part. You can hit Enter several times and still
see no effect (as if the key did not work). Same behavior with Kile
instead of Kate.

The bug was introduced at some point between KDE 3.5.5 and KDE 3.5.8.
The following patch fixes it.

--- kdelibs-3.5.8/kate/part/katesupercursor.cpp.orig2007-05-14 
11:52:27.0 +0400
+++ kdelibs-3.5.8/kate/part/katesupercursor.cpp 2008-01-20 16:39:19.0 
+0300
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
 {
   if (newLine)
   {
-if (m_line  int(line) || (m_line == int(line)  m_col = int(col)))
+if (m_line  int(line) || (m_line == int(line)  m_col  int(col)))
 {
   if(m_line == int(line))
  m_col -= col;

** Affects: kdelibs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: patch

-- 
kate does not show newline inserted at the beginning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 146306] Re: Kate can't insert newline character before first character in file

2008-01-19 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Please reopen this bug. I have it here on Gutsy with KDE 3.5.8.
Package versions: kdelibs4c2a-3.5.8-0ubuntu3.1, kate-3.5.8-0ubuntu3.1.

To reproduce: open a file which has more lines than fits in the screen.
Go to line 1, column 1, and hit Enter. Then a new line is inserted but not 
shown.

In fact, it needs not be the first line in the file, only the first line on the 
screen.
Same behaviour in Kile, so the bug is in katepart.

-- 
Kate can't insert newline character before first character in file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for kdebase in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98955] Re: logd not running

2008-01-17 Thread Sergei Ivanov
I think that using the old bootlogd is the right fix. It seems that
bootlogd and logd can and should coexist on the same system (of course,
if they write to different logfiles). They just serve different
purposes.

Bootlogd is to save everything sent to /dev/console. It does not know
who writes what. It can start and exit any time, and scripts do not
notice any change (no SIGPIPESs, no failed IO, no nothing). This is the
right tool for the problem what did that scrolled-away messages say?.

Logd is heavier. It uses redirected output of these scripts. This allows
to log them separately, but at a price: it is not transparent (a process
can detect that its stdout is a socket), and it is must run forever (or
at least be extremely careful with those redirected file descriptors, as
they could be even passed on to daemons). It can be useful for problems
like which of these scripts issued this message? And normally the
answer should be clear even from the mixed output, so I would consider
logd as a tool for special cases.

So my suggestion is to add bootlogd to the system and use logd (once it
is working properly) as an additional tool when needed. Sorry if my
analysis is incorrect, I'm not an expert. Maybe some developer can
comment on this further.

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 77395] Re: udev rules not created for all supported backends

2007-12-30 Thread Sergei Ivanov
In Kubuntu-7.10 (libsane-extras1.0.18.8)  I have a similar problem
with Epson Stylus CX4900. It is supported by the epkowa backend
according to the manpage. It is recognized and works when an application
is run as root. But it does not work for normal user due to a permission 
problem.
I fixed this by adding the following lines to /etc/udev/libsane-extras.rules:

# EPSON Stylus CX4900
SYSFS{idVendor}==04b8, SYSFS{idProduct}==082b, MODE=664, GROUP=scanner

-- 
udev rules not created for all supported backends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 177923] Re: some monospace fonts are not monospace

2007-12-22 Thread Sergei Ivanov
On Saturday 22 December 2007, Murat Güneş wrote:
 Thanks for your report. Can you reproduce the problem in other
 applications, or is it specific to Konsole? Posting a screenshot would
 also help.

See attachment. This is the result of 'cat .kde/Autostart/.directory'
and scrolling up and down with shift-arrows.

I've removed some Asian fonts since that, so there are more substituted
characters than after a fresh install. But most of them work fine.
Note the difference in width of squares for km and ko languages
in the screenshot.

Kate a also has a problem with these fonts though it shows up differently.
First it sends a message to stderr:

ASSERT: width in
/build/buildd/kdelibs-3.5.8/./kate/part/katerenderer.cpp (798)

repeated many times. Then it cannot place cursor correctly in those lines
and messes up when I try to mouse-select a part of the line.

Another effect that I just observed: these lines in konsole and kate
change when I move another window over them (it seems that the characters
change their horizontal coordinates and overlap). I am using nvidia driver
at the moment but I've checked that the original problem is reproducible
under nv.

-- 
some monospace fonts are not monospace
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 177923] some monospace fonts are not monospace

2007-12-21 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Public bug reported:

System: fresh kubuntu 7-10 (konsole 1.6.6, KDE  3.5.8),
LANG=en_US.UTF-8.

To reproduce:
In konsole, run 'cat .kde/Autostart/.directory', then scroll back
(preferably with shift-arrows) and watch the line Name[km]=...

The letters are substituted by squares whose width is larger than 1
but smaller than 2 ordinary characters.  They garble other lines when scrolled.

There is a similar problem with the line 'Name[ta]=...' . The letters are
rendered but the width is wrong, and it produces garbage when scrolled.

On my system, the font in konsole is set to Monospace-Regular-15.
Other fonts sizes have the same problem.

Here are those lines (copy-pasted from konsole):

Name[km]=ចាបផដើមសវយបរវតត
Name[ta]=தானாகதுவககு

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
some monospace fonts are not monospace
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs