[Bug 761587] Re: Unity makes Gajim unusable
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 587272 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587272 Blacklisting system tray icons has been by design for a long time. They purposely removed the ability to edit the blacklist in 13.04. What's been done has been annoying and due to the fracturing of the indicator systems (system tray vs. app indicator vs. whatever gnome/kde are using these days) a lot of application developers have stopped trying to support the many ways to do indicators and just asked their users to make plugins, assuming that popular needs would be solved. Despite being annoying, I question whether this is a "bug" at all. It's all by intentional design. The plugin that was referred to is Gajim's way of supporting Unity's appindicator system. You can find it Gajim in Edit->Plugins or http ://trac-plugins.gajim.org/wiki/AppindicatorSupportPlugin. Since this is the "official" way of getting appindicator support at this time this bug should probably be closed as "won't fix" since Unity won't be backing down on this change. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 587272 gajim doesn't have indicator support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761587 Title: Unity makes Gajim unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/761587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048572] Re: at-spi-registry consumes most of the CPU and make the system unusable on Quantal
This was with all updates installed and the screen reader has never been turned on. I hadn't seen the issue previously (I've been on 12.10 for about a week) and didn't see it today after shutting down overnight. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048572 Title: at-spi-registry consumes most of the CPU and make the system unusable on Quantal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi2-core/+bug/1048572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048572] Re: at-spi-registry consumes most of the CPU and make the system unusable on Quantal
It didn't make my machine unusable but at-spi2-registryd consumed a CPU core for quite a while until I killed it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048572 Title: at-spi-registry consumes most of the CPU and make the system unusable on Quantal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi2-core/+bug/1048572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1049623] Re: [PATCH] 3.5.0 regression: usbhid doesn't call report_fixup before comparing descriptors after resume
Removed Kernel 3.6.1, confirmed mouse still froze after resume on 3.5.0-17.28. Installed 3.5.0-18.29 from Proposed, mouse no longer freezes on resume. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049623 Title: [PATCH] 3.5.0 regression: usbhid doesn't call report_fixup before comparing descriptors after resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1049623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1018215] Re: Unity launcher appearing interrupts GTK drag and drop operation (that's nowhere near the launcher)
Actually here's a screencast I made more clearly demonstrating the effects of this bug in nautilus. I try to show that dragging very quickly or very slowly works fine, but dragging and releasing right when the launcher is fading causes the drag to terminate and the icon reset. The 14-21 second stretch includes me repeating it six times in a row on the desktop (this happens in normal usage...oh so frustrating). 35-37 shows it happening twice in a row when dragging from the desktop and a window and at ~57 I managed to do it from the window to the desktop. Each occurrence of a drag & drop failure corresponds with a seeming "flicker" of the launcher in the video. That's when the launcher fade is only partially complete when releasing the mouse button, causing it to fade back in rapidly. ** Attachment added: "nautilus.ogv" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1018215/+attachment/3407478/+files/nautilus.ogv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018215 Title: Unity launcher appearing interrupts GTK drag and drop operation (that's nowhere near the launcher) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1018215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1018215] Re: Unity launcher appearing interrupts GTK drag and drop operation (that's nowhere near the launcher)
Drag & drop operations in nautilus are also terminated if the mouse button is released at the same time the unity launcher performs its "fade" operation. A demonstration of this issue happens in this screencase (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1060580/+attachment/3367038/+files/drag%20and%20drop.ogv from an unrelated bug, issue happens at the 32 second mark) This can be demonstrated across the deaktop and between windows if the mouse button is released during the same fraction of a second the launcher fades. Since this corresponds to a relatively common speed I seem to move at I can have file move operations simple fail to happen up to four times in a row until I'm either faster than when the launcher fade begins or slower than when it ends. In other words if the "hijacking" occurs during the same time I release my mouse button nautilus has no idea where I dropped the file since my mouse has "left" the program's window. If this description is unclear I can try creating a screencast that demonstrates the issue more clearly in Nautilus. This happened for me under Precise and is still happening under Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018215 Title: Unity launcher appearing interrupts GTK drag and drop operation (that's nowhere near the launcher) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1018215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1049623] Re: [PATCH] 3.5.0 regression: usbhid doesn't call report_fixup before comparing descriptors after resume
I've had the same issue with a logitech mouse as well. Kernels as of 3.6.1 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ fix the issue for me (Kevin's patch was included as of 3.6.1). Thank you for all your effort! I'll downgrade back to 3.5 if/when this patch gets back-ported to the main Quantal kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049623 Title: [PATCH] 3.5.0 regression: usbhid doesn't call report_fixup before comparing descriptors after resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1049623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969343] Re: Unable to connect to WPA enterprise wireless
Swapped to the packages from Mathieu's PPA. Connects like a charm where the stock packages fail. Long term connection stability not tested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969343 Title: Unable to connect to WPA enterprise wireless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/969343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969343] Re: Unable to connect to WPA enterprise wireless
Downgrading openssl to 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4 (and not doing anything to wpa_supplicant) correct the issue for me but break work-critical packages that depend on >= openssl 1.0.1 (curl, virtualbox etc). So it's using wifi at work or doing work at work :( I'm not a wpa_supplicant expert but this may indicate that either wpa_supplicant is not at fault or openssl is not at fault and wpa_supplicant just doesn't work correctly in this corner case with the new version of openssl. Upstream may be able to make that educated determination -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969343 Title: Unable to connect to WPA enterprise wireless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/969343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879167] Re: Broken multi-arch support
This bug seems to have reappeared in 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu1: $ sudo apt-get --no-install-recommends install openjdk-6-jre:i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: icedtea-plugin:i386 Recommended packages: ttf-dejavu-extra:i386 icedtea-netx:i386 The following NEW packages will be installed: openjdk-6-jre:i386 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 85 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/232 kB of archives. After this operation, 706 kB of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 161613 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking openjdk-6-jre:i386 (from .../openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): './usr/share/applications/openjdk-6-policytool.desktop' is different from the same file on the system Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879167 Title: Broken multi-arch support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/879167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 530124] Re: [USB-Audio - Z-10 USB Speaker] Volume scaling wrong in lucid, regression
I forgot about this bug. Yes, The Z-10 works fine on 10.10 for me as well. Only took about four releases =) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- [USB-Audio - Z-10 USB Speaker] Volume scaling wrong in lucid, regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634707] Re: package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Less simple but less abrasive workaround to try before purging. edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/kdm.postrm and comment out the following three lines since they're apparently unnecessary: if [ "$1" = "purge" ] ; then rm /etc/init/kdm.conf || exit $? fi -- package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 661940] Re: package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634707 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634707 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 634707 package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug 634707 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-workspace/+bug/634707/+subscribe -- package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624432] Re: package otrs2 2.4.7-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 618729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618729 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 618729 package otrs2 2.4.7-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255 -- package otrs2 2.4.7-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 530124] Re: [USB-Audio - Z-10 USB Speaker] Volume scaling wrong in lucid, regression
** Bug watch added: ALSA Bug Tracker #4803 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=4803 ** Also affects: alsa-driver via https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=4803 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [USB-Audio - Z-10 USB Speaker] Volume scaling wrong in lucid, regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397617] Re: brightness no more working on karmic (KMS)
I haven't done extensive regression testing to prove it was the specific patch above but the issue was resolved between Lucid alpha-3 and beta-1. I suspect it was in the commit for bug 511965 in kernel 2.6.32-19.28. That patch may need to be expanded upon to include support for additional Macbook models or it may be another issue entirely for the 1,1 models. Since I only have a (working) 2,1 now I really can't confirm the issue with the 1,1s. Best to follow Steffen's instructions and keep reporting on bug 511965 with your hardware information until more information turns up. -- brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397617] Re: brightness no more working on karmic (KMS)
This is entirely fixed for my Macbook 2,1 using the latest Lucid liveCD (linux-generic 2.6.32.19.20)! Brightness goes all the way from fully bright to pleasantly off on the lowest notch with no modification and using the brightness keys built into the keyboard. I'd be tempted to call the brightness experience perfect out the gate. The new fix also cleaned up the funky brightness slider bug that appeared back in Jaunty: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397309 -- brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367309] Re: [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook
Yes, this is entirely fixed for my Macbook 2,1 using the latest Lucid liveCD! Brightness goes all the way from fully bright to pleasantly off on the lowest notch natively. I noticed that the highly related bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 was just marked Fix Released. I believe that fix took care of both bugs. -- [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527458] Re: please include status messages/tooltips
Colin largely sums up my feelings on the matter as well as my interpretation of (what I see as a flaw in) Mark's perspective. Tooltip information is something that I check not just daily but several times per hour and include: -Which WIFI network I'm connected to (I have to juggle a couple at work) -The currently playing track in Rhythmbox -Estimated time remaining on my battery -Audio output percentage over 100% What makes this especially aggravating [every ten minutes] is the latter two, which as others have explained are NOT available with a simple click at this time. There are ways to beatify and improve tooltips (example here: http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2009/11/01/just-leave-it-on-the-counter/ ), and just naming obvious icons is certainly something that should be avoided as a properly designed icon SHOULD be self-explanatory. But removing them outright glosses over the place where tooltips truly shine, which is providing useful, specific, informative details that do not have a place in the primary GUI or that can be summed up in the icon. The perfect example is the battery meter icon which is easily identifiable without a tooltip, displays battery/adapter status, and an at-a-glance approximation of the charge. What it is unable to display without unnecessary clutter is the precise charge percentage and estimated time remaining, which are very useful details and should be available with absolute minimal interruption of the user's workflow. Requiring several clicks and refocusing is ADDING to interruption and user interface clutter, not reducing it. The real consequences of this change are PRECISELY CONTRARY to the intended consequence. Yes tooltips are used poorly in some instances. A targeted approach to beautification and alignment with purpose is certainly due but mass removal is the completely wrong approach to the problem. I understand that it's too late to beautify and target tooltip issues individually but it isn't too late to leave them in place. To top it all off an LTS release when Ubuntu is at the height of its technological polish is absolutely the wrong place to leave such a glaring wound in the individual user's experience. -- please include status messages/tooltips https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397617] Re: brightness no more working on karmic (KMS)
Also still broken on Macbook 2,1 with Lucid alpha-3 -- brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 448885] Re: Samsung NC10 screen brightness up/down function keys do not work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 397617 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 397617 brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) -- Samsung NC10 screen brightness up/down function keys do not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451706] Re: Samsung n130 brightness keys do not send release events
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 397617 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 448885 Samsung NC10 screen brightness up/down function keys do not work ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 397617 brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) -- Samsung n130 brightness keys do not send release events https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409889] Re: NC10 fails to up and down the brightness
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 397617 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 448885 Samsung NC10 screen brightness up/down function keys do not work ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 397617 brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) -- NC10 fails to up and down the brightness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428054] Re: xrandr backlight property control missing (when using KMS?)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 397617 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 397617 brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) -- xrandr backlight property control missing (when using KMS?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367309] Re: [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video- intel/+bug/397617 seems to be the bug for the missing backlight. If you could chime in there with your specs and thoughts it might help. The missing backlight is holding up testing of the wonky backlight =) -- [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397617] Re: brightness no more working on karmic (KMS)
There seem to be a number of people, including Macbook users, reporting that their backlight is non-functional in Karmic. This bug seems the most relevant and most comments seemed to point to this one as well. I'm using a Macbook 2,1 and don't have a usable backlight, leaving me stuck at max brightness (AAAH, my poor eyes!). The backlight existed and worked with Hardy, Intrepid, and Jaunty (with a couple issues that aren't relevant here). $ xbacklight No outputs have backlight property $ ls -a /sys/class/backlight/ . .. $ This occurs when using kernel linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic (current Karmic default) or linux-image-2.6.32-020632rc5-generic (most recent from the kernel ppa) Also tried xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2 (current Karmic default) and 2:2.9.0+git20091019.751e0a3e-0ubuntu0tormod2 (from xorg- edgers ppa). Using 'nomodeset' when booting either kernel drops me into a terminal login that flickers unendingly. It's been mentioned a couple times this was fixed through a kernel patch but I'm unsure if it's made it into linux- image-2.6.32-020632rc5-generic. Is there anything else I can do to try and help pin down this bug? -- brightness no more working on karmic (KMS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450024] Re: [Karmic] ubuntuone-synchronized emblem showing on all files and folders
Adding the obligatory "me too" and a relevant http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8096162";>forum thread of others reporting the same. Consensus seems to be the upgrade of ubuntuone packages to 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 as the culprit. -- [Karmic] ubuntuone-synchronized emblem showing on all files and folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388216] Re: Unable to adjust brightness (KMS bug)
This still affects me as well macbook 2,1 0:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu1 linux-image-generic 2.6.31-13.43 -- Unable to adjust brightness (KMS bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367309] Re: [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook
I've been using Karmic on my Macbook 2,1 since beta but cannot confirm whether this bug is fixed for me since Karmic can't find a backlight device _at all_. There discussion in the kernel mailing lists about a possible fix for this new issue which is macbook specific. I'll update this bug once I'm done having my eyes burned out. -- [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424800] Re: unable to sign in to ubuntuone
Confirmed work-around: Sign into the Ubuntu One website https://one.ubuntu.com Select a plan (this step I hadn't thought to do manually): https://one.ubuntu.com/plans/ Once you have confirmed your plan, the authorization process on the local computer now works It would be nice if this process were a little more obvious, but at least everything "works". -- unable to sign in to ubuntuone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424800] Re: unable to sign in to ubuntuone
Awesome. If you're unable to replicate it yourself let me know so I can assist with testing. -- unable to sign in to ubuntuone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424800] Re: unable to sign in to ubuntuone
I can confirm this bug on a completely fresh installation of 9.10 Beta plus current updates from the repositories. Behavior on my system is an exact duplicate of that described above (ever-looping request to log in to Ubuntu One with your launchpad username displayed correctly) when using Firefox with a completely new profile and no add-ons (which rules out the "no script" add-on being the issue). When attempting authentication with Epiphany or Google Chrome the attached page is displayed instead. Also, the storageprotocol package's version does not match the rest of the ubuntuone suite: Package: python-ubuntuone-client 0.96.0-0ubuntu1 Package: python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 0.95.0-0ubuntu1 Package: ubuntuone-client 0.96.0-0ubuntu1 Package: ubuntuone-client-gnome 0.96.0-0ubuntu1 Package: ubuntuone-client-tools 0.96.0-0ubuntu1 ** Attachment added: "Error - Google Chrome.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33031113/Error%20-%20Google%20Chrome.png ** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- unable to sign in to ubuntuone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 442943] Re: cannot login to ubuntu one
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 424800 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424800 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 424800 unable to sign in to ubuntuone -- cannot login to ubuntu one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367309] Re: [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook
I have a "Macbook2,1" with an Intel 945GM just like the original poster and have been experiencing precisely the same symptoms (all the way down to the behavior of each of the BACKLIGHT_CONTROL methods) as described in this bug since I started using Jaunty sometime in the alphas. I have just been using the "combination" method to get a usable backlight through the following command: xrandr --output LVDS --set BACKLIGHT_CONTROL combination -- [i945GM] xrandr backlight control is bizarre on Macbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59963] Re: installer crashed
Hope this all helps. Must say, my PC is acting weird lately - possible hardware issues??! Runs just fine as a Live CD though, just have issues installing the O/S (6.06 LTS, 6.06.1 or whatever the newer Dapper release is that recently came out and now this Knot2 release of Edgy) so who knows... -- installer crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/59963 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59963] Re: installer crashed
the /var/log/partman file ** Attachment added: "the var log partman file" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4224838/partman -- installer crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/59963 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59963] Re: installer crashed
The other syslog file, /var/log/syslog ** Attachment added: "the var log syslog file" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4224837/syslog -- installer crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/59963 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59963] Re: installer crashed
attachment: /var/log/installer/syslog ** Attachment added: "the installer syslog" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4224836/syslog -- installer crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/59963 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59963] installer crashed
Public bug reported:
We're sorry; the installer crashed. Please file a new bug report at
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug (do not
attach your details to any existing bug) and a developer will attend to
the problem as soon as possible. To help the developers understand what
went wrong, include the following detail in your bug report, and attach
the files /var/log/installer/syslog, /var/log/syslog, and
/var/log/partman:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 132, in ?
install(sys.argv[1])
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 57, in install
ret = wizard.run()
File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 295, in run
self.process_step()
File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 787, in process_step
self.mountpoints_to_summary()
File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 1146, in
mountpoints_to_summary
self.progress_loop()
File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 582, in
progress_loop
raise RuntimeError, ("Install failed with exit code %s\n%s" %
RuntimeError: Install failed with exit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/ubiquity/install.py", line 1286, in ?
install.run()
File "/usr/share/ubiquity/install.py", line 349, in run
self.configure_keyboard()
File "/usr/share/ubiquity/install.py", line 795, in configure_keyboard
self.set_debconf('debian-installer/keymap', keymap)
File "/usr/share/ubiquity/install.py", line 1264, in set_debconf
dc = debconf.Debconf(read=dccomm.stdout, write=dccomm.stdin)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/debconf.py", line 48, in __init__
self.setUp(title)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/debconf.py", line 51, in setUp
self.version = self.version(2)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/debconf.py", line 60, in
lambda *args, **kw: self.command(command, *args, **kw))
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/debconf.py", line 81, in command
status = int(status)
ValueError: invalid literal for int():
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
installer crashed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59963
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57000] Re: Installer Crashed
the /var/log/partman file -- Installer Crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/57000 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57000] Re: Installer Crashed
the /var/log/syslog file -- Installer Crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/57000 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57000] Re: Installer Crashed
Found how to attach the files here they are. -- Installer Crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/57000 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57000] Installer Crashed
Public bug reported:
The installer-crashed page, says attach the files:
attach the files /var/log/installer/syslog, /var/log/syslog, and
/var/log/partman
but I cannot see how you attach files here. Below is the rest of whats
on the crashed, page:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 130, in ?
install(sys.argv[1])
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 55, in install
ret = wizard.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 264,
in run
self.progress_loop()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py", line 538,
in progress_loop
raise RuntimeError, ("Install failed with exit code %s; see "
RuntimeError: Install failed with exit code 1; see /var/log/installer/syslog
and /var/log/syslog
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Confirmed
--
Installer Crashed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57000
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 39856] Re: Panel in middle of the screen after reboot when not full-sized
This just happened to me (its happened before, too) after I changed my graphics driver to "nv" from "nvidia" and restarted X (obviously, my resolution was lowered when using "nv") After doing what I needed to do, I changed back to "nvidia" and back to lovely high resolution but the panel I normally have at the bottom (which is not expanded, sits in the centre with my icons) was shrunk down to 2 icons wide and I couldn't stretch it back out to its normal size and it was not at the bottom of the screen in the high resolution, it was where it was when I was running low resolution in the "nv" driver - so it was near the centre of the screen in terms of height (Y Axis) it was still in the centre in terms of X axis. hope this helps.. -- Panel in middle of the screen after reboot when not full-sized https://launchpad.net/bugs/39856 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
