[Bug 812554] Re: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents
I still get the same error, even on Firefox 9.0.1, but no problem printing from Google Chrome (which prints to a pdf file and then prints the pdf). No problem printing from any other program on my Ubuntu 11.04. My Brother HL-5250DN usually prints the first page from Firefox ok, but any subsequent printing gives error: ERROR NAME; undefined COMMAND; Q OPERAND STACK; Stan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554 Title: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 813870] Re: Seamonkey blows when I try to display an email from Inbox at Gmail.com.
I changed status on my bug to Invalid because it's not a firefox(ubuntu) bug and I can't report it as a Seamonkey bug. Seamonkey is not a Canonical supported package. I'll report elsewhere. Too bad that Launchpad won't let me delete the bug even though I posted it in error. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813870 Title: Seamonkey blows when I try to display an email from Inbox at Gmail.com. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/813870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 813870] [NEW] Seamonkey blows when I try to display an email from Inbox at Gmail.com.
Public bug reported: Click on the message title bar in the Inbox list of my Gmail account, and Seamonkey completely disappears without error message. Version 2.0.13 running on Ubuntu 11.04. The message selected should open for reading. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813870 Title: Seamonkey blows when I try to display an email from Inbox at Gmail.com. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/813870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812554] Re: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents
Oops. I meant to say 11.04 (not 10.04) in comment #2. Can't edit it. That's a deficiency of Launchpad. The owner of a comment should be able to edit it. Likewise with the reporter of a bug, should be able to edit it to correct errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554 Title: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812554] Re: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents
Hey, guys. There's a package name in the database for every Firefox release, but not for Firefox-5.0, which is the current default version on Ubuntu 10.04. So, I can't say it Affects firefox-5.0, but that's the case. This bug affects 5.0 but not the prior releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554 Title: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812914] Re: Firefox 5 wrongly displays some pages too tall with large blank area between top text and bottom text
** Attachment added: "The Firefox 5 page on right has missing content, which is actually rendered far below, seen by scrolling far down." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812914/+attachment/2217778/+files/Chromium_Firefox5_same%20page%20showing%20bad%20FF%20rendering.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812914 Title: Firefox 5 wrongly displays some pages too tall with large blank area between top text and bottom text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812914] [NEW] Firefox 5 wrongly displays some pages too tall with large blank area between top text and bottom text
Public bug reported: Sometimes Firefox 5 renders pages as extremely tall pages with large whitespace gap between top content and the rest of the content, which in contrast Chromium displays correctly. Here's an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz,_California . See screenshot submitted below, showing Chromium on left and Firefox 5 on right displaying same URL top of page. Scrolling down the Firefox page will eventually reach the missing content, but only after a very large amount of blank space. Firefox version is up to date: 5.0+build1+nobinonly- 0ubuntu0.11.04.2 . ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic-pae 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 19 07:07:22 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 flashplugin-installer N/A adobe-flashplugin 10.3.181.34-0natty1 icedtea-plugin N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812914 Title: Firefox 5 wrongly displays some pages too tall with large blank area between top text and bottom text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812554] Re: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents
** Attachment added: "Screenprint of the Page Setup dialog box." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554/+attachment/2215593/+files/PageSetupFirefox5_AnyPrinterBug.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554 Title: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812554] [NEW] Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents
Public bug reported: Since upgrading to Firefox 5, on Ubuntu 11.04, I can't print from Firefox to my networked printer. I get an error printout from the printer saying: "ERROR NAME: undefined COMMAND: Q OPERAND STACK: " instead of the document printout. Looking at the Page Setup dialog in Firefox 5, I see that it is set for printing to a portable format called "Any Printer" rather than set to my default printer which is a Brother HL-4250DN on the LAN ethernet. Trying to change the printer by pulling down the list in that diaglog and selecting the Brother does not maintain the setting after I click "Apply". When I look after applying and closing the dialog and reopening, it has reverted back to Any Printer, not the Brother. I think this is why the print command from Firefox sends faulty format data to my printer. It's not the printer driver's fault. The same printer works fine on other programs that print, such as LibreOffice, the document viewer for pdf, and Chromium for web sites. It's something wrong in Firefox that won't hold the printer selected in Page Setup. This same hardware used to work on earlier Firefox 3.x.x and 4.x betas. Since I upgraded (by clean installation) to Ubuntu 11.04, I can't print from Firefox 5. Version of Firefox is latest: 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2. Screenprint of dialog is attached. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic-pae 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jul 18 13:41:30 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 flashplugin-installer N/A adobe-flashplugin 10.3.181.34-0natty1 icedtea-plugin N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812554 Title: Firefox 5 for Ubuntu 1.0 issues undefined command to printer; page setup reverts to Any Printer for Portable Documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/812554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
Here's the page source. ** Attachment added: "Source file of the page, html only." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+attachment/2208406/+files/view-source%20www.ehow.com%20way_5632390_gambrel-small-style-home-plan.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
Same web site causes SeaMonkey 2.0.13 (latest version for Ubuntu) to crash during page loading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
** Attachment added: "Same page displayed in Chromium, showing center text." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+attachment/2208381/+files/Screenshot_inChromium.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 808491] Re: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements.
The two links in upper right cell that are missing should be in the gap where the mouse pointer is. ** Attachment added: "Firefox 5.0 doesn't show the 2 links." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+attachment/2208352/+files/Screenshot_SokolowsWebSite_missing2links.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808491 Title: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 808491] Re: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements.
Screen shot showing the web page as it should appear, as it does appear on Firefox for Windows, Chromium for Ubuntu, and earlier Firefox releases 3.x.x on Ubuntu. ** Attachment added: "See the links in upper right cell of table. Compare with Firefox display of same page." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+attachment/2208351/+files/Screenshot_showingLInks_Chromium.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808491 Title: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
Here's a screenshot of what I see when it fails. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the web page in question, using Firefox 5.0 for Ubuntu Cannonical 1.0" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+attachment/2208349/+files/Screenshot_missing_center.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
After refreshing a few times, it came up correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] Re: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810220] [NEW] Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly.
Public bug reported: http://www.ehow.com/way_5632390_gambrel-small-style-home-plan.html displays with large central space empty, but the text of the article appears there when displayed with Google Chrome browser. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 13 17:21:42 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 flashplugin-installer N/A adobe-flashplugin 10.3.181.34-0natty1 icedtea-plugin N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810220 Title: Web page doesn't display this www.ehow.com page correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/810220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 808491] Re: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808491 Title: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 808491] [NEW] Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements.
Public bug reported: On the Windows version of 5.0 and earlier Firefox versions for Linux (including Firefox 3.6.13), the following web page displays correctly: http://www.thesokolows.com . On the Linux version 5.0+build1 +nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2, running on Ubuntu 11.04, two elements in the upper right table cell don't show. (The page was composed using SeaMonkey, so the abundance of and and elements is due to the way SeaMonkey composes pages.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jul 10 12:51:52 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 5.0+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.2 flashplugin-installer N/A adobe-flashplugin 10.3.181.34-0natty1 icedtea-plugin N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808491 Title: Firefox 5.0 on Ubuntu Linux fails to display some elements. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/808491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511379] Re: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311)
I went to Synaptic from the System Settings dialog, searched for bcmwl. It found the kernel source for the Broadcom. Then I marked that source file for reinstallation, applied, and after it finished reinstalling, I rebooted. The driver now works. (I may have had to activate it first, don't remember, but if it isn't working, then install the driver either from system settings or by clicking on the icon when the top panel displays the restricted drivers icon.) I don't understand why re- installation of the source works from Synaptic, but the initial activation didn't work. It just does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511379 Title: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511379] Re: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311)
I reinstalled 11.04 from the live DVD, without connecting to the Internet, thinking that the proprietary Broadcom STA driver would install from the DVD. But that didn't help. When I rebooted after installation, and tried to activate the proprietary driver, the driver installer said that the drivers were not installed and insisted that I connect to the Internet, and after I plugged in, it downloaded the driver profiles and found the Broadcom driver, but got the same error. If there's a way to install the driver that is on the CD and DVD, that would be a work-around until the driver repository is fixed. I don't know how to force that installation, however. Any suggestions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511379 Title: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511379] Re: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311)
Same problem on Ubuntu 11.04. From the desktop live CD running to try it out, the system recognizes that it needs the Broadcom STA driver and installs it from the CD, with no Ethernet connection plugged in. But after installing the OS onto the hard drive (with the Ethernet connection that it insisted upon before starting installation), the system gives the "blacklisted" error when it tries to install the wifi driver after reboot. I'm writing this bug report from that computer with the live CD running and the Broadcom proprietary driver installed, so the driver on the CD is definitely ok.The repository where the actual installed hard-drive system looks must have a bad version of the driver, perhaps a regression to a prior version by mistake. The computer is a Dell Inspiron 1764. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511379 Title: Jockey fails to install Broadcom STA wireless driver (BCM4311) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27541] Re: Touchpad should block while typing
This is still a problem in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. There is a setting in menu System > Preferences > Mouse > Touchpad that claims to disable touchpad clicks while typing. However, this is implemented in gnome- settings-daemon poorly. In that daemon, in function set_disable_w_typing, the settings manager spawns syndaemon with a parameter "-i 0.5", meaning to set the delay after a keypress to one- half second (500 ms). During that delay after a keypress, the touchpad is temporarily ignored. If you read the man page for syndaemon, you'll see that the default delay interval is 2 seconds. 500ms is too short. In effect, whether or not the user checks the setting in preferences, the touchpad is not ignored while typing. I've had to temporarily disable the touchpad completely when I'm doing a lot of typing to avoid accidental chaos when the heel of a hand brushes against the touchpad during typing. To work around this too-short delay, I killed syndaemon and re-spawned it from the terminal with a 2 second delay "-i 2" parameter. This so far seems to be working fine, as intended. So the right fix would be to change line #511 in the gnome-settings-manager http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/tree/plugins/mouse /gsd-mouse-manager.c?id=46cfbb45bac09fd86f13a1995a4b4b2742b39c25#n498 . The parameter "0.5" should be "2" or you could remove the -i parameter and it's argument completely, allowing the default built into syndaemon to take effect. Even better, add a slider in the mouse preferences touchpad tab to let the user choose the delay that works best for him/her. Meanwhile, I'm going to try adding some shell script commands in my rc.local file to kill syndaemon and run it in daemon mode with a better interval. This is what I tried in the terminal: kill `ps -C syndaemon -o pid=` syndaemon -d -i 2 -k I'm not sure why the -k parameter is important, but it's in the gnome- settings-daemon code already, so I'll just put it in my script, too. The kill command fetches the process id number using the ps command, then kills that process. Then the syndaemon command re-spawns. I'm going to try this until an update to gnome-settings-daemon fixes this bug. Please, someone, be sure that the maintainer for gnome-settings-manager gets a copy of this comment. -- Touchpad should block while typing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42115] Re: Clicking on date in calendar applet open previous date in Evolution
I haven't been using Evolution, since I began using Google's Calendar. I tried the problem again after receiving notice of the importance change. I'm running Lucid 10.04 up-to-date.The double-click on the date in the panel's drop-down calendar opens Evolution (2.28.3) with the correct date. As far as I can see, the problem has been resolved. -- Clicking on date in calendar applet open previous date in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575492] Re: Intel 5100 AGN wireless connection bug
I have an ASUS X83VB-X2 notebook, which has the Intel 5100 AGN wifi adapter built-in. Ubuntu 10.04 live CD runs but when it tries to connect to my wireless router, the computer hangs and I have to reboot with 4-second power-off. Ctrl-Alt-Bksp and Ctrl-Alt-Del don't even interrupt the hang. I haven't gone further with this bug. My router works fine with 10.04 on a different computer with a different wifi adapter, and my ASUS works fine wirelessly on Vista-64. I don't have time to play with this problem. Just wanted to let you know it affects this notebook computer, too. -- Intel 5100 AGN wireless connection bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599152] Re: package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51004801/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51004802/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51004803/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51004804/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51004805/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599152] [NEW] package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg I did a clean installation of Ubuntu 10.04 on entire hard disk, then the system did a partial upgrade of lots of packages. Several errors occurred, including this one. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 27 15:00:39 2010 ErrorMessage: package libc6 is already installed and configured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6 is already installed and configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185677] Re: package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
Ooops, I take it all back. The computer that I thought was running the final release of 8.04 LTS was actually running 8.04 alpha #1. Who knows what bugs lurked in there waiting for me to stumble over them with this update. Disregard my prior comment #23.Anyway, the system is working fine, and even runs tomboy, so I guess the older version of tomboy still works without the failed update. -- package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185677] Re: package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
I just had the same bug appear when I was updating an 8.04 LTS computer that has not been used for about 6 months or more. The Update Manager reported that there were over 500 updates to do, so I let it rip. First, it said it couldn't do a full upgrade, just a partial upgrade (I just wanted it to do what it could do, so that's ok). Then in installation phase, I got the series of errors mentioned above, dealing with mono-gac, mono-addins0.2-cil, tomboy, fspot, and the final coup saying that the system is in an indeterminate state or something like that and it may not run. I rebooted and am sending this report just to show that whatever fix was thought to have solved the problem, didn't fix for me. My installation was not from a beta, but rather from the final 8.04LTS release. So much for long term reliability.I'm glad this was not a production computer, just one I use from time to time. I haven't done anything to the packages that were downloaded from standard repositories. I don't even use Mono. ... Moving on to a clean 9.10 installation, until the next LTS comes out, and then I'll do another clean re-installation.If I were an IT professional with a customer having this problem, I'd be kicking myself for going forward with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS at this point. Hopefully, anyone in that position can clean up the mess by removing and reinstalling affected programs, if they can be determined. The big question is, why is the update still failing after all these months? One would hope that when status is "Fix Released", it stays fixed. -- package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162480] Re: [gutsy] Ejecting zip disk works but then gives error messages
Martin, I no longer have the ATAPI ZIP disk installed in my Ubuntu computer, and I'm running release Hardy 8.04.1 now.I have an external USB Zip disk.I will update this bug report after I exercise the USB Zip further. --Stan -- [gutsy] Ejecting zip disk works but then gives error messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35638] Re: Printer is not detected properly over USB
Whoa! I respectfully object that declaring this bug as invalid just to resolve it is not a responsible way to treat Ubuntu bugs. I am one of the other people who "really saw this problem" and reported it. I haven't been participating in this bug thread for quite a while because I got around the bug by using the parallel port instead of the buggy USB interface, but I've been watching and hoping for a bug fix. My printer is a Brother HL-1440. I have several. They all do the same thing. I recently bought a newer Brother model HL-5250. I've been too busy to install Hardy alphas since alpha-3, but when beta is released, I plan to install the beta and re-test all of the bugs I reported which are still unresolved, including this one. I recall seeing other bug reports which are almost duplicates of this bug, so I'm sure that other people had the problem and either gave up on Ubuntu or used a different printer or port. I see that a new Brother driver is targeted for inclusion in the beta release. That should be a good time to re-visit this bug. As the famous movie line from Arnold goes, "I'll be bock." Please keep this bug open. Stan -- Printer is not detected properly over USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35638 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 178166] Re: [Hardy Alpha-2 i386: Totem-xine] Totem-xine installed the normal way using Synaptic but it won't launch -- libxine.so.1 is missing.
I've been too busy to install new alphas, but when beta is released, I'll install Hardy beta and try it again. Basilio Kublik wrote: > Hi Stanley > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu > better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity > in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Can you try > with the development version of Ubuntu, Hardy Heron? > > Thanks in advance. > > ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Basilio Kublik (sourcercito) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- [Hardy Alpha-2 i386: Totem-xine] Totem-xine installed the normal way using Synaptic but it won't launch -- libxine.so.1 is missing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 178155] Re: [Hardy Alpha-2 Totem] While playing a DVD-VR, seeking to a different place in movie does not work.
I've been too busy to install new alphas, but when beta is released, I'll install Hardy beta and try it again. Basilio Kublik wrote: > Hi there > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu > better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity > in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Can you try > with the development version of Ubuntu, Hardy Heron? > > Thanks in advance. > > ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Basilio Kublik (sourcercito) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- [Hardy Alpha-2 Totem] While playing a DVD-VR, seeking to a different place in movie does not work. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178155 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178308] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound.
Changed status because user dancer58 reports he still has no sound, even in up-to-date Hardy system. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178308] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound.
To dancer58: Are you still having sound problems with all updates installed (up-to-date system)? -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162336] Re: system sounds not working
I'm running Hardy alpha-3 with current updates, and the sound works fine for me. Since there have been no further reports on this bug and recent releases seem to have fixed it, I'm changing status. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Fix Released -- system sounds not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178467] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 compiz (or compiz-fusion) compizconfig-settings-manager] Extra level of effects does not work but Normal does, no Custom option, default Extra effects are not set,
I'm running Hardy alpha-3 with current up-to-date updates. Compiz is working okay. Appearance visual effects have reasonable settings. I'm changing status. ** Changed in: compizconfig-settings-manager Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 compiz (or compiz-fusion) compizconfig-settings-manager] Extra level of effects does not work but Normal does, no Custom option, default Extra effects are not set, and some effect tooltips are useless. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181002] Re: unable to open document
OpenOffice.org version 2.3.1 solved this problem. Bug fixed. ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- unable to open document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
Firefox 3.0b3pre does not have this bug. ** Changed in: firefox Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
The Firefox-3.0 preview release (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b3pre) Gecko/2008010221 Firefox/3.0b3pre) does not have the problem. After installing 3.0 and setting it as the default browser, I did the "Report a Problem" from Evolution, and Firefox-3.0 launched to complete the bug report after apport finished uploading the info files. -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
I did another test. I previously had installed Mozilla Seamonkey. I now set Seamonkey as the preferred browser (System > Preferences > Preferred Applications) and re-booted. (Just logging out and in again didn't change the default behavior of Nautilus when I clicked on an html file; but after re-booting, Seamonkey launches for html files.) When I next did the same Evolution > Help > Report a Problem, apport then behaved correctly by opening Seamonkey's browser after apport finished uploading the files. So, this apparently confirms that the problem is in Firefox 2.0.0.10, not Evolution nor apport. I see that the Firefox web site now has a version 2.0.0.11 for Linux in tarball, but it's not in the Ubuntu repository yet. This may be a good time to get .11 into the repository as an update, unless it has its own show-stopper bugs. The Ubuntu repository does contain an alpha of Firefox 3.0 for Linux. I may try that version to see if the bug has been eliminated in 3.0 yet. Until then, the workaround is Seamonkey. Setting Seamonkey as the default browser does not interfere with normal use of Firefox when launched manually. -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181002] Re: unable to open document
Just tried it again. It opens ok now. I'm running the same version you cited: openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-3ubuntu3 Thu Jan 24 15:50:13 UTC 2008. From my point of view, the bug status can be changed to "fix- released". -- unable to open document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
I added Firefox as an affected package, since the error report seems to be indicating that this was a bad window call to X from within Firefox. "About Firefox" reports: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.10) Gecko/20071128 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/2.0.0.10 ** Also affects: firefox Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
I am running Ubuntu i386 with the default Gnome (not Xubuntu, not Kubuntu). -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
The first time I ran the ubuntu-bug command, the apport window opened and it collected info, but it closed, and then nothing. I don't recall whether it also uploaded files. I ran it again and this time it collected, uploaded, and opened a Firefox window to report the bug in Launchpad. I went further along with the bug report, which seemed to work normally, but I closed Firefox before actually submitting a bogus report. Then I ran ubuntu-bug a third time. Here's the terminal output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ubuntu-bug -p evolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ubuntu-bug -p evolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The program 'firefox-bin' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. (Details: serial 273 error_code 3 request_code 20 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) Since the behavior was inconsistent and sine the X error message above explains that error reports are asynchronous, maybe this bug is a race condition. -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport 0.101 does not open Firefox after collecting crash data.
gconftool says "firefox %s" and the firefox command launches Firefox to URL requested (www.ubuntu.com). When I go into Evolution > Help > Report a Problem, apport comes up and collects information then uploads information then closes, but no launch of Firefox is made to let the user complete the report. This should be easy to try, without waiting for a bug to catch. The version of apport and of apport-gtk are both 0.101, which are the latest available versions. Firefox has been working normally on this system. I'm running the 1/31/08 daily build, updated a few hours ago with all available updates. -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] Re: [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
I tried another test case: While Firefox is open, I initiated a bug report within Firefox: Help > Report a Problem. Again, apport launched, said it was collecting information, then said it was uploading, but when the upload window closed, no new tab nor new window of Firefox opened to complete the bug report. I waited, but nothing. -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189311] Re: Can't install the software stored in the accompanied 'driver & utilities' CD
Please give more detailed information about what you are trying to do and what happened. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Can't install the software stored in the accompanied 'driver & utilities' CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
The build manifest for the daily build dated 01 Feb 2008 (also known as 20080201) contains the fixed version of jockey: jockey-common 0.1-0ubuntu1 jockey-gtk 0.1-0ubuntu1 -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
Try using update manager to bring the system "up-to-date". On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 02:40 +, yujan wrote: > Upgrade to the laster version at 080131, but still have this issue. My > computer is HP Compaq 6515b. > -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
Jerry, I installed 20080131.2 (the second updated rebuild after 20080131). The manifest for that build shows jockey-common 0.1~r139 jockey-gtk 0.1~r139 and indeed when I ran it and installed it, at first jockey blew. Then I ran the bunch of updates that update manager (on top panel) told me were available. These updates included the most recent release, later than ~r139, of jockey. That fixed the problem. Synaptic will probably report the new release available if you reload the repository data. Just run a system update and it probably will fix your problem, too. jerrylamos wrote: > This bug occurred on 20080131 Hardy Alpha (4?) build which lists jockey-gtk as > Installed Version 0.1~r139 > which Synaptic thinks is the Latest Available Version. > > Stanley, what is the level of the "newly released version" you refer to? > > This is a Compaq Presario with ATI RC410. > > Thanks, Jerry > > -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
After updating with update-manager, the newly released version of jockey-gtk is installed. It does not crash like this bug reports any longer. It successfully installed nVidia restricted driver without that "time" name bug either. Thanks, jockey developers. Changing status to fix-released. ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187865] [NEW] [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Running today's latest daily build with latest updates at this time. apport version is 0.101. When opening Evolution, it crashed. Apport asked me for permission to report the crash, which I gave. It collected data and the apport window closed. Usually in the past, a Firefox window would launch into a new bug report on Launchpad. This time it did not do anything after apport closed. I launched Evolution again. It crashed again. When apport collected info, I opened the terminal frame within apport window to see the contents of the report data, but I was unable to copy for pasting into a manually created bug report. (apport would not highlight a selection.) Tried to launch Evolution a third time, to write down the crash data. After clicking the Evolution icon on top panel, system monitor showed some activity going on and the busy cursor turned about 5 seconds, then activity ceased. System seemed to have ignored the crash silently. ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy 8.04 i386 alpha daily 20080131.2] apport does not open Firefox after collecting crash data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
New version with various bug fixes has been released into Hardy. I changed status pending test of tomorrow's daily build. ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
I notice that a new version of jockey-gtk has been released into Hardy a few hours ago, so this bug may be fixed in the next daily build. I'm changing the status to "incomplete" pending test of the new version. Tune in tomorrow. . . . -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
Still happens in latest daily build 20080131.2. Notice that this bug is not the same as bug #187355, which was due to a global name "time" being undefined, not an assertion error as in this bug. ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187139] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187355] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package(). (Global name "time" is undefined.)
** Summary changed: - jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package() + jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package(). (Global name "time" is undefined.) ** Description changed: [Hardy 8.04 i386 desktop alpha daily 29 Jan 2008] Since this build does not install any restricted driver manager, I used Synaptic to install Jockey-gtk in a freshly installed system after bringing system up-to- date and reloading repositories. Jockey-gtk crashes when attempting to activate nVidia restricted driver. (Driver was installed by system - installation by default in restricted-modules-generic.) + installation by default.) Traceback shows an undefined Python global + name "time" was the cause of the crash. - As reported in bug #177141, no restricted driver manager is installed by - the default installation. Neither jockey nor restricted manager exist - on the daily manifest. This needs to be resolved by 8.04 final release, - but the sooner the better for testing. + As reported in bug #177141, no restricted driver manager is installed by the default installation. Neither jockey nor restricted manager exist on the daily manifest. This needs to be resolved by 8.04 final release, but the sooner the better for testing. + UPDATE: jockey-gtk and jockey-common now are on the LiveCD manifest, so they load by default as of the 20080131.2 build. However, the version of jockey-gtk is still 0.1~r139 on that manifest, so it is the same version as the one I reported crashed (see below). So the bug still exists. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jan 30 09:23:48 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jockey-gtk InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: jockey-gtk 0.1~r139 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/jockey-gtk ProcCwd: /home/overbyte ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin LANG=C SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/jockey-gtk'] SourcePackage: jockey Title: jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package() Uname: Linux Northgate-U804d129 2.6.24-5-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 24 19:45:21 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: -- jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package(). (Global name "time" is undefined.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 177141] Re: [Hardy] Jockey not installed by default
I don't know why the Launchpad bug report was set as private. I have un-checked that box so it is public now. In the data automatically collected by apport-crash is a python traceback. It shows that jockey-gtk has an undefined global name "time". I see that the current daily build (20080131.2) has the same version of Jockey-gtk (0.1~r139) as the one I tried in the 29Jan2008 daily, which crashed. So I don't expect any better results, but I'm downloading the current daily to try it anyway. I'll update this report with the outcome. Verstraete Linard wrote: > @Stanley Sokolow: My Jokey-gtk crashes also. I have already reported a > few post above you. What's the reason yours is crashing? (Can't see it, > you have set it to private) > > -- [Hardy] Jockey not installed by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187355] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- jockey-gtk crashed with NameError in install_package() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177141] Re: [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.)
Jokey-gtk crashes. See bug #187355. Still there is no restricted manager of any sort installed on LiveCD nor by default onto hard drive installation. Manual installation of jockey requires technical knowledge that a new user should not have to know in order to try out visual effects of compiz. Therefore, this is still a bug in Ubuntu which should continue to have high importance for a fix as soon as possible. "jockey-gtk" and jockey-common should be included in the manifest. -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178308] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound.
Problem may have been resolved in newer daily builds. Testers who still have trouble after bringing their systems up to date should report here or try alpha-4 release. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184410] Re: hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade
Fixed in later daily builds. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184410] Re: hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade
Daily build 29 Jan 2008 no longer has this hal problem. -- hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177141] Re: [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.)
Apparently restricted-manager has be replaced by jockey, so I'm marking this restricted-manager bug as invalid again. ** Changed in: restricted-manager Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Description changed: In Kubuntu Hardy/alpha1 there is no administration module for restrictred drivers in System Settings. See the attached screenshots. - (Restricted-manager does not get installed by default.) + (Neither restricted-manager nor jockey is installed by default.) -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186256] Re: [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written.
** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity - Daily-builds 24 Jan 2008 through 27 Jan 2008 all fail installation from + Daily-builds 24 Jan 2008 through 29 Jan 2008 all fail installation from Live CD when using the Guided Entire Disk option. These installations were being made onto a hard drive that has an older version of Ubuntu installed on the partition #1 ext3, and the only other partition is the swap partition. During installation, the error message comes up: "Failed to create a file system. The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of SCSI1(0,0,0)(sda) failed." When I tried installation again (without rebooting the CD), the same error occurred. Then I chose the manual partition method. I used the existing partitions, assigned mount point / to the ext3 partition, asked for formatting of - that partition, and the system then installed. (However, I then found - another error that was a show-stopper. See bug report #186246. ) + that partition, and the system then installed. -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177141] Re: [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.)
Neither restricted-manager nor jockey-gtk are listed on the current i386 desktop manifest, so this bug description still is valid and has been confirmed by several people. ** Changed in: restricted-manager Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-1] Restricted drivers administration does not exist. (Restricted-manager is not installed by default.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186412] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything
Reading bug #8497, I see that bug as a problem with the mapping of hard drives in multi-drive systems, i.e. which drive is the primary boot drive. However, the current bug is not that. Here the menu.lst doesn't list any drive to boot from. My testing system now has only one hard drive and it experiences this bug. -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186412] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything
If it's not too late, could you please set this to Importance=High and put it on the milestones for the Alpha-4 release? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/hardy-alpha-4 It would be far better to delay alpha-4 a little in order to fix this bug so the alpha-4 installations actually produce a system that boots into the kernel, rather than pushing out an alpha-4 release that requires a lot of manual editing to work around this bug. I would say that this bug is a show-stopper for alpha-4. -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186412] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything
** Tags added: grub -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186412] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything
** Summary changed: - update-grub does not write anything + [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything ** Tags added: iso-testing -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha] update-grub does not write anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186256] Re: [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written.
** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity - Daily-builds 24 Jan 2008, 25 Jan 2008, and 26 Jan 2008 all fail - installation from Live CD when using the Guided Entire Disk option. - These installations were being made onto a hard drive that has an older - version of Ubuntu installed on the partition #1 ext3, and the only other - partition is the swap partition. During installation, the error - message comes up: "Failed to create a file system. The ext3 file - system creation in partition #1 of SCSI1(0,0,0)(sda) failed." When I - tried installation again (without rebooting the CD), the same error - occurred. Then I chose the manual partition method. I used the - existing partitions, assigned mount point / to the ext3 partition, asked - for formatting of that partition, and the system then installed. - (However, I then found another error that was a show-stopper. See bug - report #186246. ) + Daily-builds 24 Jan 2008 through 27 Jan 2008 all fail installation from + Live CD when using the Guided Entire Disk option. These installations + were being made onto a hard drive that has an older version of Ubuntu + installed on the partition #1 ext3, and the only other partition is the + swap partition. During installation, the error message comes up: + "Failed to create a file system. The ext3 file system creation in + partition #1 of SCSI1(0,0,0)(sda) failed." When I tried installation + again (without rebooting the CD), the same error occurred. Then I + chose the manual partition method. I used the existing partitions, + assigned mount point / to the ext3 partition, asked for formatting of + that partition, and the system then installed. (However, I then found + another error that was a show-stopper. See bug report #186246. ) -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186412] Re: update-grub does not write anything
See also bug #186246 which reports that menu.lst in recent Ubuntu i386 desktops installed from daily builds of LiveCD do not have the necessary kernel boot information, just like the "empty" menu.lst file attached to this bug. Bug #186246 may be another consequence of this faulty update- grub command. -- update-grub does not write anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186246] Re: [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4
** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity - Installed Ubuntu from the daily-builds dated 24 Jan 2008 through 26 Jan + Installed Ubuntu from the daily-builds dated 24 Jan 2008 through 27 Jan 2008 using manual installation to entire disk after verifying the iso downloads and checking live CDs. (These were done on same computer system on 3 separate days.) The installed systems won't boot beyond the "grub>" prompt. Closer examination of the installed systems shows that the boot menu used by grub lacks the title, root, and kernel lines. This should be fixed by alpha-4 or the alpha-4 will not be useful for - testing of the installed system. + testing of the installed system. The underlying reason for this faulty + menu.lst file may be explained by bug #186412. -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186246] Re: [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4
** Summary changed: - [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 + [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186256] [NEW] [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Daily-builds 24 Jan 2008, 25 Jan 2008, and 26 Jan 2008 all fail installation from Live CD when using the Guided Entire Disk option. These installations were being made onto a hard drive that has an older version of Ubuntu installed on the partition #1 ext3, and the only other partition is the swap partition. During installation, the error message comes up: "Failed to create a file system. The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of SCSI1(0,0,0)(sda) failed." When I tried installation again (without rebooting the CD), the same error occurred. Then I chose the manual partition method. I used the existing partitions, assigned mount point / to the ext3 partition, asked for formatting of that partition, and the system then installed. (However, I then found another error that was a show-stopper. See bug report #186246. ) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: daily iso-testing ** Summary changed: - [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build: Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written] + [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. ** Tags added: daily iso-testing ** Summary changed: - [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. + [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha-3+ daily-build] Guided entire disk installation fails when installing onto existing Ubuntu system that should be over-written. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186246] Re: [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4
** Summary changed: - [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build: Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4] + [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build] Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186246] [NEW] [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build: Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4]
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Installed Ubuntu from the daily-builds dated 24 Jan 2008 through 26 Jan 2008 using manual installation to entire disk after verifying the iso downloads and checking live CDs. (These were done on same computer system on 3 separate days.) The installed systems won't boot beyond the "grub>" prompt. Closer examination of the installed systems shows that the boot menu used by grub lacks the title, root, and kernel lines. This should be fixed by alpha-4 or the alpha-4 will not be useful for testing of the installed system. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: daily iso-testing ** Summary changed: - [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy alpha daily-build: Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4] + [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build: Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4] ** Tags added: daily iso-testing -- [Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy i386 desktop alpha daily-build: Installation to hard drive produces bad grub boot menu.lst file lacking necessary boot info -- SHOW-STOPPER FOR ALPHA-4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 184410] Re: hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade
The current daily build (20080122) still lists libhal1 0.5.10-5ubuntu2 in the manifest. When a daily build contains hal_0.5.10-5ubuntu3_i386, I'll download it and resume testing. Rene Pärts wrote: Fixed in hal_0.5.10-5ubuntu3_i386. -- hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184410] Re: hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade
I have the same problem on Hardy 8.04 Alpha-3. Alpha-3 has been working until now. The Alpha-3 system has been broken by some new update, as described above. I get the same error message about "internal error" saying "Failed to initialize HAL!" The logout button is not working and network icon indicates error (!). I can do ctrl- alt-backspace to kill x-server, which returns to login screen, from which I can shutdown. This is on a desktop i386 (Celeron) system, so it's not limited to notebook computers. (Dov-El's Dell Inspiron 1501 is a notebook.) Returning the system to Gutsy 7.10 by swapping out the primary hard drive, I can boot 7.10 and it runs fine. -- hal fails to initialize in hardy alpha 3 after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181923] Re: [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-3 Live-CD] Update-manager icon reports "unable to communicate with backend".
I agree. As my report implies, I was physically connected to my LAN, which has a router connected to the Internet. When I manually ran the update manager, it did connect with no trouble. I suppose the live CD had not made a logical connection yet when the update manager was run automatically at login of the administrative user. When the update manager runs, if no logical connection has been made yet, the connection should be made while the update manager is held suspended until connection is available, instead of giving an error that is confusing like this. -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-3 Live-CD] Update-manager icon reports "unable to communicate with backend". https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182130] Re: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
[Hardy 8.04 alpha-3 i386] During automatic installation of missing codec for .asf files in Totem, installation failed with message: E: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183036] [Hardy 8.04 alpha-3] Installing Adobe flash player in Firefox ends in error while processing libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil On a web page containing embedded Flash content, I clicked on the icon to install the missing plugin for Flash. I selected the Adobe non-free plugin. It started to download and install. Then I got error message saying that not all changes and updates succeeded. The details say . . . Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package flashplugin-nonfree. (Reading database ... 91436 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking flashplugin-nonfree (from .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.115.0ubuntu3_i386.deb) ... Setting up libflickrnet2.1.5-cil (25277-6) ... * Installing 1 assembly from libflickrnet2.1.5-cil into Mono ! Assembly /usr/share/cli-common/policies.d/libflickrnet2.1.5-cil/policy.2.1.FlickrNet.dll does not exist dpkg: error processing libflickrnet2.1.5-cil (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.115.0ubuntu3) ... Downloading... --17:43:33-- http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz => `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' Resolving fpdownload.macromedia.com... 72.246.86.70 Connecting to fpdownload.macromedia.com|72.246.86.70|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 3,036,127 (2.9M) [application/x-gzip] 0K .. .. .. .. .. 1% 54.68 KB/s 50K .. .. .. .. .. 3% 101.34 KB/s 100K .. .. .. .. .. 5% 157.82 KB/s 150K .. .. .. .. .. 6% 150.38 KB/s 200K .. .. .. .. .. 8% 157.82 KB/s 250K .. .. .. .. .. 10% 122.29 KB/s 300K .. .. .. .. .. 11% 158.06 KB/s 350K .. .. .. .. .. 13% 143.04 KB/s 400K .. .. .. .. .. 15% 156.72 KB/s 450K .. .. .. .. .. 16% 157.82 KB/s 500K .. .. .. .. .. 18% 154.19 KB/s 550K .. .. .. .. .. 20% 157.68 KB/s 600K .. .. .. .. .. 21% 122.37 KB/s 650K .. .. .. .. .. 23% 157.80 KB/s 700K .. .. .. .. .. 25% 143.49 KB/s 750K .. .. .. .. .. 26% 156.34 KB/s 800K .. .. .. .. .. 28% 127.28 KB/s 850K .. .. .. .. .. 30% 138.60 KB/s 900K .. .. .. .. .. 32% 158.18 KB/s 950K .. .. .. .. .. 33% 154.33 KB/s 1000K .. .. .. .. .. 35% 158.01 KB/s 1050K .. .. .. .. .. 37% 134.54 KB/s 1100K .. .. .. .. .. 38% 157.88 KB/s 1150K .. .. .. .. .. 40% 143.11 KB/s 1200K .. .. .. .. .. 42% 166.89 KB/s 1250K .. .. .. .. .. 43% 157.95 KB/s 1300K .. .. .. .. .. 45% 147.86 KB/s 1350K .. .. .. .. .. 47% 157.88 KB/s 1400K .. .. .. .. .. 48% 146.63 KB/s 1450K .. .. .. .. .. 50% 155.97 KB/s 1500K .. .. .. .. .. 52% 146.17 KB/s 1550K .. .. .. .. .. 53% 162.36 KB/s 1600K .. .. .. .. .. 55% 124.92 KB/s 1650K .. .. .. .. .. 57% 177.87 KB/s 1700K .. .. .. .. .. 59% 157.83 KB/s 1750K .. .. .. .. .. 60% 119.55 KB/s 1800K .. .. .. .. .. 62% 157.78 KB/s 1850K .. .. .. .. .. 64% 153.79 KB/s 1900K .. .. .. .. .. 65% 158.08 KB/s 1950K .. .. .. .. .. 67% 141.99 KB/s 2000K .. .. .. .. .. 69% 157.92 KB/s 2050K .. .. .. .. .. 70% 136.69 KB/s 2100K .. .. .. .. .. 72% 170.29 KB/s 2150K .. .. .. .. .. 74% 157.77 KB/s 2200K .. .. .. .. .. 75% 141.80 KB/s 2250K .. .. .. .
[Bug 182006] Re: [ubuntu hardy alpha 3] update-manager fails the partial upgrade
I got the advisory to do a partial upgrade, but instead I closed that message and tried to update the few packages that were checked in the update manager's list. Then I got a message saying that some repositories can't be used because of checksum errors. I retried and got another message: An error occured The following details are provided: E: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- [ubuntu hardy alpha 3] update-manager fails the partial upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182006] Re: [ubuntu hardy alpha 3] update-manager fails the partial upgrade
[Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] I get the same error messages on alpha-2 when trying to do a routine update. That is, not all updates can be installed, run a partial upgrade to install as many updates as possible . . . could not calculate upgrade. I'm on a clean installation of alpha-2 (not an upgrade from alpha-1). -- [ubuntu hardy alpha 3] update-manager fails the partial upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181923] [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-3 Live-CD] Update-manager icon reports "unable to communicate with backend".
Public bug reported: Update manager icon on top panel pops up an error message, saying that it is unable to communicate with backend and that this should be reported as a bug. When I click on the icon, the update manager window comes up and says system is up to date. The clicking on "Check" appears to start a normal repository downloading, which locates 60 updates to be made. This alpha-3 iso was just released today, so I doubt that so many updates are truly ripe for installation yet. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 8.04 alpha-3 iso-testing ** Tags added: 8.04 alpha-3 iso-testing -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-3 Live-CD] Update-manager icon reports "unable to communicate with backend". https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178045] Re: [Hardy Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. (Fixed in 8.04 Alpha-3.)
** Summary changed: - [Hardy Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. + [Hardy Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. (Fixed in 8.04 Alpha-3.) ** Summary changed: - [Hardy Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. (Fixed in 8.04 Alpha-3.) + [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. (Fixed in 8.04 Alpha-3.) -- [Hardy 8.04 Alpha-2] "Check CD for Defects" does not work. (Fixed in 8.04 Alpha-3.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178308] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound.
[Hardy 8.04 alpha-3] Still no system sounds. -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2] No system sounds but Totem plays sound. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 150930] Re: Black screen, and bad usplash.conf
Have you tried just setting xres and yres to the native (highest) resolution of your monitor and then re-booting? On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:15 +, warmrobot wrote: > I leave > xres=(blank) > yres=(blank) > > and then > sudo dpkg-reconfigure usplash > > Did not help > -- Black screen, and bad usplash.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152493] Re: Title bars on windows disappear every 7 times the title bar text changes
Correction to my prior comment: When I mouse-over the controls, the grey bar appears every 1 to 5 times. Never more than 5 tries before the bar appears. Another observation: When I un-maximize the window, as I said, I can mouse-over as many times as I want and it won't cause the grey bar to appear. This is true even when I stretch the size of the window to its full extent as though it were maximized, but still not in "maximized" mode. That makes me suspect that the problem is not in the nVidia driver, because I find it hard to believe that the driver would know whether the state of the window is maximized or not. I haven't studied the compiz code at all on this matter, but it's my hunch that maximizing/un-maximizing a window is the function of the window manager, not the graphics hardware driver. In any case, this observation should be another clue to the developers. Also, usually the grey bar disappears and the colored title bar restores to normal when I pull the mouse pointer off of the controls. However, sometimes I can pull the pointer off of the control and some or all of the bar remains. I can mouse around the window and the grey bar stays, until I mouse over the controls again and move off, then the bar disappears. So, sometimes the bar has persistence until the next mouse-off event. -- Title bars on windows disappear every 7 times the title bar text changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152493] Re: Title bars on windows disappear every 7 times the title bar text changes
[Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 compiz] I have similar but not exactly same behavior. Installed version of compiz is 1:0.6.99+git20080102-0ubuntu1 and linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-2-386, which are the latest available. Ubuntu is "up-to-date" i386 version. Running "Normal" effects with nVidia restricted driver, the latest new version added to Ubuntu repository yesterday. When I mouse over the controls (minimize,maximize,X) on title bar of a maximized window, a grey bar appears across the top of the title bar sometimes. It seems to be random. It never happens when the same window is un-maximized. Sometimes consecutive mouse-overs do it; sometimes not until 5 to 10 mouse-overs. Mousing over the title bar itself doesn't do it. The grey bar obscures the title bar and its controls all the way from left to right. Sometimes it's a few pixels high; sometimes half of the height of the title bar. My desktop background is the leather image, which is dark brown, so I'm sure the grey bar is not simply disappearance of the top portion of the title bar. If it just disappeared, I would see my desktop background, but I see grey instead. The grey has a vertical gradient, dark at top and lighter below, as though it is a shadow border of the top panel. I notice that the grey is not uniform height all across. It is wider on the left and tapers to narrower on the right. It may be helpful if all of the bug reporters on this bug include in their comments the type of graphics processor they have so we can see if it only occurs on nVidia graphics. My computer has nVidia GeForce FX 5500. -- Title bars on windows disappear every 7 times the title bar text changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181002] Re: unable to open document
I copied the document file to my Windows volume, rebooted into Windows XP, and opened the same file with the Windows version of OpenOffice. After a few seconds of processing, the document opened fine in WordProcessor. It is a 107 page text document. It does contain some embedded diagrams. Maybe processing them causes the program to fail. This bug and the file should be passed upstream to OOo. I am attaching the testcase file here so even if it is removed from the Internet, it's still available for testing. ** Attachment added: "A MS Word document that causes OpenOffice.org WordProcessor for Linux (openoffice.org-core 1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5) to go into infinite loop while trying to open it. This same file opens correctly in the Windows version of OpenOffice." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11187327/Hangs%20OOo%20wordprocessor_xmla1.1.doc -- unable to open document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181002] Re: unable to open document
[Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 openoffice.org-core 1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5] On this testing iso, the same thing occurs. That document causes OOo WordProcessor to go into an apparent infinite loop consuming 93% of the cpu time. The window is blank except for title bar. It goes grey. After minimizing, it won't un-minimize. I had to kill it from the 'top' command window. -- unable to open document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42115] Re: Clicking on date in calendar applet open previous date in Evolution
[Hardy 8.04 Alpha-2 for i386 desktop] Same faulty behaviour occurs in this iso-testing version. Relevant versions: evolution 2.21.4, Gnome panel 2.20.1, clock 2.20.1.That is, double-clicking on a date in the drop-down calendar (from the panel clock) opens the prior date (at 9:00 am) in the Evolution calendar. Clock has my correct time zone (America_Los Angeles). Evolution Preferences>General also shows my correct time zone. -- Clicking on date in calendar applet open previous date in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179020] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a pr
Today, many updates were available from system update, including the new nVidia driver. I installed the updates, which went normally. I restarted. I got a popup message informing me that a restricted driver was available. I activated it. It downloaded from the Ubuntu repository again and installed. I restarted. I activated the "Normal" effects. They work. Then I did 10 consecutive warm restarts of Ubuntu. All 10 detected the screen resolution correctly. No low resolution startups. This problem seems to have been fixed by nVidia's new driver. (Updated title of this bug.) ** Summary changed: - [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a problem with open-source driver. New nVidia proprietary driver is available from nVidia. + [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a problem with open-source driver. New nVidia proprietary driver is available from nVidia. It fixes the problem. ** Summary changed: - [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a problem with open-source driver. New nVidia proprietary driver is available from nVidia. It fixes the problem. + [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a problem with open-source driver. New nVidia proprietary driver is in the updated Ubuntu restricted repository. It fixes the problem. -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2, nVidia proprietary driver] Display resolution randomly starts at low resolution instead of the chosen resolution when using nVidia proprietary driver but not a problem with open-source driver. New nVidia proprietary driver is in the updated Ubuntu restricted repository. It fixes the problem. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162480] Re: [gutsy] Ejecting zip disk works but then gives error messages
[Hardy 8.04 alpha 2] On this iso, I get better results with ZIP disks. I can eject by using right-click>Eject on the desktop ZIP icon, I get the popup message about the writing on the zip disk and that user should not remove the disk, but it already did eject the disk. Then a message pops up saying that it's safe to remove the (ejected) disk. If I try to eject using the eject button on the ZIP drive, nothing happens until I eject with the right-click>eject on ZIP disk icon. Then it ejects and gives the message "writing data to device" and also give the error message "cannot eject volume" even though the disk is ejected. ** Tags added: 8.04 alpha-2 iso-testing -- [gutsy] Ejecting zip disk works but then gives error messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 49613] Re: flash plugin always rendered on top of html
The bug has been kicked around on the Firefox Bugzilla site for a long time. Apparently they have figured out that it's a problem with the Adobe Flash plug-in for Linux. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137189 . The fix will require that Adobe change the plug-in to use a new feature called "windowless plug-in support" on Linux. That's not expected to occur until after Firefox 3 is released, it seems. -- flash plugin always rendered on top of html https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 179505] Re: [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 root privileges] Root has no privileges.
Ok, I now understand that this is another security feature, not a bug. In earlier Ubuntu releases (not sure which) I was able to activate the superuser root account by giving it a known password. That has changed, which is fine, I guess. On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 07:16 +, Saïvann Carignan wrote: > Thanks for your bug report and for your contribution. > > This behavior is normal for Linux Ubuntu since it doesn't use root > account. If you want to get administrative privilege in Linux Ubuntu, > all you need to do is to login inside a account that has administrative > rights and then type sudo before any terminal commands that require > administrative privilege, and gksu for any graphical programs that > require administrative privilege. This way to work is a bit different > from other Linux distribution which needs the root account in order to > have administrative rights, but sudo and root are probably both very > secure. > > For more information : https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RootSudo > > I set the status of this bug to invalid. > > ** Changed in: ubuntu >Status: New => Invalid > -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 root privileges] Root has no privileges. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179505] [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 root privileges] Root has no privileges.
Public bug reported: Testing Hardy 8.04 alpha-2. Go to System>Administration>Users_and_Groups. Click on "Unlock". Click on "root">"Properties">"User Privileges".Root has no privileges. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 8.04 alpha-2 iso-testing ** Tags added: 8.04 alpha-2 iso-testing -- [Hardy 8.04 alpha-2 root privileges] Root has no privileges. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
