[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load
Hmmm, I ran it, but CTRL+A, CTRL+C, CTRL+V don't seem to do anything, nor does right click :S -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load
Hey mate thanks, sorry but how would I go about installing that? :P -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load
Happens to me literally all the time. No need to visually parse the directory if you cache the required query :P -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495723] Re: Nautilus File Copy Lag
Pardon me, I thought it was more clear than that. If you consider the "Ctrl+C" keyboard shortcut as a trigger to the operation of placing the file(s)/directory(s) into the clipboard for copying, and I am saying is that the trigger does not initiate the operation until about 2 seconds after the directory in opened - from which the trigger is initiated. Hopefully that makes more sense. -- Nautilus File Copy Lag https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
@Ramon md5sum filename or sha256sum filename -- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
@Steve Langasek I understand that, though what I'm wondering is whether there was any change from 46 to 48, which could have fixed this issue. -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
Furthermore, I should state the full kernel version that the final version of Ubuntu (which we did our testing on) is 2.6.31-14.48 and not 14-46. Is there a fix from 46 to 48? -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
Hello. I have wrote a C program to implement the test I described above. Currently, it checks 100x 8K blocks around the 512MB mark, by swapping them with each other, back to front. Running the program twice should thus result in an identical file. Using this program, you can check that read/write ability of your filesystem, in particular around with 512MB mark in a file (both before, at, and after). http://codepad.org/msApnHFY If you don't have gcc installed (it isn't by default): sudo apt-get install build-essential To compile: gcc -o tester tester.c Further, I wrote a perl script to simplify testing: http://codepad.org/djmLaJ0l To run: chmod +x tester.pl ./tester.pl If those links disappear at some stage, the programs can be found here: http://starcraftmazter.net/launchpad/453579/ Both me and my friend have ran the test on the Ubuntu iso itself. I am using a 64bit install of 9.10 and he is using a 32bit install of 9.10. The kernel used for our tests is the default 2.6.31-14-generic. We are both on ext4. Both of our tests came up fine, and read/write works perfectly and the before/after hashes are the same, hence we could not observe any problem. I would encourage anyone experiencing this problem to run the above tests and see what happens, in an effort to isolate the problem. Cheers -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
@aldebx Of course I realise this, perhaps I need to elaborate my idea. I mean, since the error apparently occurs when large files are edited, a test should be devised whereby changes are made to a large file, saved, and then un-done and saved - and the before and after checksums compared, to see if there in fact is a problem with writing large files. Furthermore, since the problem allegedly happens around bits at the 512MB mark, so my idea is to write a program to take an X number of blocks before and after this bit, and swap them. X must be even to ensure every block is swapped with another. I am thinking of swapping 1000 blocks before the point with 1000 points after the point. Using fsync and running the program twice should ensure that both changes are written, and the second undoes the first - thus if two hashes of the file are taken, one before and one after the experiment, they will either be identical if no problems occured or different if there is in fact a problem. So my question is, would this be a good test to do? I will probably have time to do it tomorrow. -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
fimbulvetr - did you try editing the file? On that note, I'm doing a fresh install of 9.10 with ext4 on my laptop around the start of next week, and I'm wondering if anyone can suggest some methods to try and reproduce the bug. So far I'm thinking about obtaining a very large file, copying it around the HD, and modifying it. I'm wondering if changing the file around the 536870912th byte would be a useful thing to do? -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
I've applied the latest update to my DV5-1138tx, and I can too confirm that sleep now works!! Thanks a lot to Paul Swanson and everyone else who worked hard to make this happen :D And to HP for finally fixing it, hehe. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161787] Re: Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep.
Also, the pcspkr creates static for me on reboot, which is an extra annoyance. -- Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161787] Re: Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep.
I would like the developers to elevate the importance of this bug. This issue is present in jaunty, in the beta, with all the packages up to date. I have found it impossible to disable the system beep in any way. None of the configuration options noted above work for me. I also cannot simply blacklist the pcspkr or snd-sprk module, because my laptop has the speaker built into the sound card - which means the only way to disable it, is to blacklist the module for the entire sound card - which means no sound of any kind whatsoever. And the beep is really bloody annoying. I know ubuntu developers put it there willingly several versions back, so it's not like you have to search around trying to find it - how hard can it be to put an option on it, whether to enable it or not at shutdown? Thanks. -- Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
RetributionLSR, I have Jaunty with that kernel and suspend does *not* work for me. What exact model is your laptop? And are you sure it all works? Also, I have been using Jaunty for almost a month, and have had no real sound issues (just a bit of static sometimes). Cheers -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
I just flashed to F.14, didn't do anything as far as the problem is concerned :( -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
hey mlaverdiere, thanks for that. Can you please outline exactly how the menu.lst file has to be edited? Can you post the exact line which you added to it? Or is it some other change? Cheers -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
I have upgraded to 9.04 alpha4, and now have the 2.6.28 kernel. Unfortunately, it does not improve the problem. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
Doesn't seem to be working for me Carlos, and I'm on intepid. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
Wooops, here are mine. Once again, this is a dv-5 1138tx. Thanks! ** Attachment added: "lspci & dmesg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20631874/diagnostics.tar.bz2 -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend
Hello guys. I have the HP Pavilion dv-5 1138tx, and I can confirm to having this exact problem. I am using 8.10, fully updated and such. Just to test it out, does anyone know how to install the HP bios updates from a bootable cd? HP help site mentions something called ROMPaq, but it doesn't have clear instructions on how to use it. Cheers. ** Attachment added: "tty5" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20459587/hp_pavilion_dv5_1138tx_sleep_problem.jpg -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
