[Bug 530305] Re: [OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 5/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian (sid) to lucid (universe)
Hi, I'm the maintainer of ocaml-batteries in Debian. I believe that the release is stable enough to be released any time soon in a distro; the packaging is meant to be in good shape too. More importantly, I believe it would be totally inappropriate to release the *fomer* ocaml-batteries which was in Debian/unstable until a few days ago, as it is a line of developement which is completely abandoned now. FWIW, let me remind you that currently no one from Ubuntu is helping out with OCaml package maintanance. On the Debian side we do our best to have sync stable for Ubuntu releases, but it would just be fair to have someone on the Ubuntu side help out, or at least come to us (our VCS and/or mailing lists) for specific information (like in this case). Hope this helps, Cheers. -- [OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 5/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian (sid) to lucid (universe) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154274] Re: Website does not reference Debian visibly
Many thanks for the fix guys! -- Website does not reference Debian visibly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154274 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154274] Re: Should reference Debian visibly
Jean-Christophe, please, here we are trying to be propositive. Insinuating that it was intentional won't help. Besides, if you have a look at my blog post on this topic (http://www.bononia.it/~zack/blog/posts/2007/10/debian_on_ubuntu_com_just_a_bug.html) you will notice that the "reports" of this issue in the past *might* (of course I'm not sure about that) have been delivered via the wrong channel. This bug report received feedback quite fastly, let's see if this will be the right chance to get this solved, at least from the point of view of the ubuntu website. So, trying to be positive, what else do you think deserve to be mentioned on the ubuntu website that hasn't yet been discussed in this bug log? -- Should reference Debian visibly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154274 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
