Re: [Bug 2083665] Re: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg-resources
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 03:28:17PM -, Renan Rodrigo wrote: > 2. Common python package dependencies like `python3-requests` will still > bring pkg-resources in. (python3-requests->python3-chardet->python3-pkg- > resources). That's the reason I don't know if it's worth removing it > here, or making an effort to remove it overall now at last hour. Right. The difference is that python3-requests is Priority: optional; it's included in effectively all of our bootable images, but it's not in the base system. > (that mentioned, kinda sad that this popped up here as a last-hour thing > :/ ) Yes, there's a takeaway here that we look at priority mismatches much too late in the cycle, when it's late to try to take action on anything we find that looks wrong. I will take the action to put this on the release team's checklist for beta, to give the team more runway in the future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083665 Title: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg- resources To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2083665/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083665] Re: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg-resources
> Ok, I can remove the dependency, but we still depend on setuptools (which on its turn depends on python3-pkg-resources). Where is this dependency? I do not currently see a runtime dep from ubuntu-pro-client to python3-setuptools. Is it somehow masked by the python3-pkg-resources dep? There is actually another dep that would hold python3-pkg-resources in the Priority: important base set, which is: netplan.io -> python3-rich -> python3-pygments -> python3-pkg-resources I did overlook this and don't know whether it can be dropped for oracular but I think we should still look at both. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083665 Title: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg- resources To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2083665/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083665] Re: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg-resources
This is worth trying to get done for oracular, because python3-pkg- resources has started pulling in a lot more dependencies in this release. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083665 Title: ubuntu-pro-client has an unnecessary dependency on python3-pkg- resources To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2083665/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077576] Re: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars
Also it doesn't matter if these characters are part of all the character sets if they're passed through to the client terminal in the wrong ENCODING. non ASCII characters almost entirely do not have the same binary representation in UTF-8 as in other character sets, including these. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077576 Title: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2077576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077576] Re: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars
Ok that's correct, at the time of review Tobias was a member of the security team so I think we can take that as the necessary sign-off. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077576 Title: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2077576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083311] Re: Upgrade to Oracular requires snaps changes
Because this was not landed before beta, we should cover it in the release notes. ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083311 Title: Upgrade to Oracular requires snaps changes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2083311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083443] Re: Please RM meep-openmpi from Oracular
INFO:root:meep-openmpi (1.25.0-4/1.25.0-4), removed from Debian on 2024-08-24 INFO:root:meep-openmpi (1.25.0-4/1.25.0-4build1), removed from Debian on 2024-08-24 meep-openmpi's binaries are not seeded. Removing packages: meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 libmeep-openmpi-dev 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 libmeep-openmpi30 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 libmeep-openmpi30-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 python3-meep-openmpi 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular amd64 python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular arm64 python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular armhf python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular ppc64el python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular riscv64 python3-meep-openmpi-dbgsym 1.25.0-4 in oracular s390x Comment: (From Debian) ROM; this variant is no longer needed; Debian bug #1079000 Remove [y|N]? y ** Changed in: meep-openmpi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083443 Title: Please RM meep-openmpi from Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meep-openmpi/+bug/2083443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083166] Re: Please remove rpki-client on armhf
Removing packages from oracular: rpki-client 9.1-1 in oracular armhf Comment: ANAIS 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083166 Title: Please remove rpki-client on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpki-client/+bug/2083166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083257] Re: Remove golang-1.21 from oracular
Removing packages: golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular amd64 golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular arm64 golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular armhf golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular i386 golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular ppc64el golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular riscv64 golang-1.21 1.21.13-1 in oracular s390x golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular amd64 golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular arm64 golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular armhf golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular i386 golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular ppc64el golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular riscv64 golang-1.21-doc 1.21.13-1 in oracular s390x golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular amd64 golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular arm64 golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular armhf golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular ppc64el golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular riscv64 golang-1.21-go 1.21.13-1 in oracular s390x golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular amd64 golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular arm64 golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular armhf golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular i386 golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular ppc64el golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular riscv64 golang-1.21-src 1.21.13-1 in oracular s390x Comment: (From Debian) ROM; EOL; superseded by golang-1.22 & golang-1.23; Debian bug #1081200 Remove [y|N]? y ** Changed in: golang-1.21 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083257 Title: Remove golang-1.21 from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.21/+bug/2083257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075247] Re: gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available
FTR I do currently have /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse running as part of the gvfs-daemon service. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075247 Title: gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/2075247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
Also this bug claims the package is ignoring the frontend variable. It is not doing that; nothing in your output shows ncurses being invoked in non interactive mode. Your problem is simply that if the package can't prompt, the installation can't succeed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
> if you are refusing to make it acknowledge > non- interactive install like other packages > do (postfix does it, openssh-server does > it... I can go on and on). You misunderstand Debian / debconf policy here. Package installation is expected to work under non interactive mode, IF THERE IS A SENSIBLE DEFAULT. In this situation, your system is broken with respect to the bootloader, and there is no sensible way to proceed to the package being "installed" in a meaningful sense without admin intervention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081940] Re: package shim-signed 1.51.3+15.7-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 已安装 shim-signed 软件包 post-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 127
shim-signed Depends: grub2-common (>= 2.04-1ubuntu24). grub2-common in jammy Depends: grub-common (= 2.06-2ubuntu7.2). grub-common contains /usr/lib/grub/grub-multi-install. Please show the output of 'dpkg -l grub-common' on your system. Your bug report also shows that this was originally an Ubuntu 22.04 (jammy) system and that this is what you are currently running. Yet you are installing shim-signed 1.51.3+15.7-0ubuntu1, which is a security update that was published a year ago. That's not a good sign regarding the security of the system; but it also means there should not have been any opportunity to /usr/lib/grub/grub-multi-install to have gone temporarily missing as part of an upgrade. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081940 Title: package shim-signed 1.51.3+15.7-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 已安装 shim-signed 软件包 post-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 127 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2081940/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081977] Re: Installation of 24.04.1 as Guest in Hyper-V vm stalls during first Boot
** Project changed: ubuntu-cdimage => ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081977 Title: Installation of 24.04.1 as Guest in Hyper-V vm stalls during first Boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/2081977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2007742] Re: Can't update stage views actor (regarding MetaWindowGroup, MetaWindowActorX11, MetaSurfaceActorX11)
Same issue, when switching Brave browser to Full Screen (F11). Also if just Maximizing Brave browser. Also happens when Maximizing 'kitty' terminal. Gnome-terminal does not cause these errors. So it seems to happen with specifically hardware accelerated applications. > uname -a Linux indy 6.8.0-45-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Aug 30 12:02:04 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2070Super nvidia-driver 550 LOGS: 2024-09-25T09:20:47.530308-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:20:47.530987-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:20:54.791964-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:20:54.792070-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:21:19.145136-06:00 indy geoclue[1975]: Failed to query location: Query location SOUP error: Not Found 2024-09-25T09:21:58.117241-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:21:58.118500-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:04.017511-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:04.017631-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:10.821752-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:10.821857-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:32.704776-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:32.704920-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:35.556571-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaWindowActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. 2024-09-25T09:22:35.556798-06:00 indy gnome-shell[2486]: Can't update stage views actor unnamed [MetaSurfaceActorX11] is on because it needs an allocation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007742 Title: Can't update stage views actor (regarding MetaWindowGroup, MetaWindowActorX11, MetaSurfaceActorX11) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2007742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081090] Re: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction
Note however that gutenprint shipped already in noble on armhf, rebuilt with 64-bit time_t. We should not introduce a library transition between noble and oracular, for an ABI transition that happened between jammy and noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081090 Title: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/2081090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077083] Re: Secure Boot broken after SBAT blacklist update on Windows 2024-08 patchday
Disabling SecureBoot, deleting the SBAT policy, and reenabling SecureBoot is strictly more secure than disabling SecureBoot. Regardless, this is resolved now. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077083 Title: Secure Boot broken after SBAT blacklist update on Windows 2024-08 patchday To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2077083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080785] Re: GRUB menu doesn't show with os-prober entries on BIOS
20 years ago, I promise you this was the behavior of grub on BIOS machines running Ubuntu. As Mate says, the current behavior on UEFI is a concession to the limitations of UEFI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080785 Title: GRUB menu doesn't show with os-prober entries on BIOS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2080785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080821] Re: Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821 Title: Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2080821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080821] Re: Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
Pam does not see the keyboard, only input text from the application driving it. What Ubuntu flavor are you using? This determines what package implements your lock screen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821 Title: Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2080821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080272] Re: install kernel in the minimal layer: server, desktop, flavors
low risk of regression, it likely works or it doesn't. Reduces image sizes. Worth taking as an FFe - approved. ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080272 Title: install kernel in the minimal layer: server, desktop, flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2080272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976184] Re: Linux PV device frontends vulnerable to attacks by backends
Closing out status on this issue, see also https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-23041 for the specific unfixed CVE. ** Changed in: linux-aws (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-azure-4.15 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux-dell300x (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux-gcp-4.15 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-oracle (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-snapdragon (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976184 Title: Linux PV device frontends vulnerable to attacks by backends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1976184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063101] Re: Update apt override from important to required
apt does not show up on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/priority- mismatches.html so this would wind up getting demoted again -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063101 Title: Update apt override from important to required To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2063101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: sslh 2.1.1-1 in oracular sslh 2.1.1-1 in oracular riscv64 Comment: FTBFS; LP: #2079513 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079513 Title: Please remove sslh from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sslh/+bug/2079513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066024] Re: eso-midas: please remove due to FTBFS
An Ubuntu-specific build failure caused by our compiler flags being more strict than Debian's does not justify a package removal. This should be fixed instead. ** Changed in: eso-midas (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066024 Title: eso-midas: please remove due to FTBFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso-midas/+bug/2066024/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076221] Re: [SRU] Add fibocom mbim service to send at command
> * Add fibocom mbim service to libmbim It is very unclear here what you mean by 'service'. From this description I would have expected to see the addition of a systemd service unit to the package, but there is none. The changelog is inadequate for an SRU to explain to users what is being done. ** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076221 Title: [SRU] Add fibocom mbim service to send at command To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2076221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076221] Re: [SRU] Add fibocom mbim service to send at command
A debdiff is attached for jammy, but there is a task still open for the devel series. What is the status of this in later releases? ** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076221 Title: [SRU] Add fibocom mbim service to send at command To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2076221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069138] Re: Demote gccgo binaries (libgo) to universe
nothing to be done on the archive side until the seeds are changed. ** Changed in: gcc-14 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069138 Title: Demote gccgo binaries (libgo) to universe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-14/+bug/2069138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?
I don't think this belongs in the release notes for 24.04 or later if it was already unusable in 22.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677 Title: Remove dmraid from oracular? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079995] Re: Please remove pytzdata from the archive
Removing packages from oracular: pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular amd64 python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular arm64 python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular armhf python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular i386 python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular ppc64el python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular riscv64 python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular s390x Comment: Duplicate tzdata, should not be used; LP: #2079995 1 package successfully removed. And added to sync blocklist. ** Changed in: pytzdata (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079995 Title: Please remove pytzdata from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytzdata/+bug/2079995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079919] Re: Please remove rust-pyo3-file
Reverse-Build-Depends = * buildlog-consultant (for librust-pyo3-file-dev) * lintian-brush (for librust-pyo3-file-dev) ** Changed in: rust-pyo3-file (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079919 Title: Please remove rust-pyo3-file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-pyo3-file/+bug/2079919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079816] Re: Please remove stravalib 1.3.0-1ubuntu1 from the archive
Removing packages from oracular: stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular amd64 python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular arm64 python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular armhf python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular ppc64el python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular riscv64 python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular s390x Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079816 1 package successfully removed. Removing packages from oracular-proposed: stravalib 1.3.0-1ubuntu1 in oracular python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64 Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079816 ** Changed in: stravalib (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079816 Title: Please remove stravalib 1.3.0-1ubuntu1 from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stravalib/+bug/2079816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive
The version in the release pocket does not fail to build: https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test- rebuild-20241209-oracular-oracular.html Is there an argument for removing this from the release pocket, or should we only remove the new ftbfs version from -proposed? ** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079513 Title: Please remove sslh from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sslh/+bug/2079513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079809] Re: Please remove python-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 from the archive
Removing packages from oracular: python-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular amd64 python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular arm64 python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular armhf python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular i386 python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular ppc64el python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular riscv64 python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular s390x python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular amd64 python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular arm64 python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular armhf python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular i386 python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular ppc64el python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular riscv64 python3-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular s390x Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; Debian bug #2079809 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: python-discord (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079809 Title: Please remove python-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-discord/+bug/2079809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079355] Re: Please remove glosstex from the archive
Removing packages from oracular: glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular amd64 glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular arm64 glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular armhf glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular ppc64el glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular riscv64 glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular s390x Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079355 1 package successfully removed. Removing packages from oracular-proposed: glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4build1 in oracular Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079355 1 package successfully removed. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1052914 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052914 ** Also affects: glosstex (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052914 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: glosstex (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079355 Title: Please remove glosstex from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glosstex/+bug/2079355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079349] Re: Please remove nield from the archive
Removing packages from oracular: nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular amd64 nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular arm64 nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular armhf nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular ppc64el nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular riscv64 nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular s390x Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079349 1 package successfully removed. Removing packages from oracular-proposed: nield 0.6.1-2build1 in oracular Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing; LP: #2079349 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: nield (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079349 Title: Please remove nield from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nield/+bug/2079349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079349] Re: Please remove nield from the archive
$ reverse-depends src:nield No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends src:nield -a source No reverse dependencies found $ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079349 Title: Please remove nield from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nield/+bug/2079349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079349] Re: Please remove nield from the archive
If the header is dropped this build failure could maybe be fixed by just dropping the reference to the header as well. But there is a different build failure in Debian (Debian bug #1066535) and the package is removed from Debian testing, so this is definitely a candidate for removal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079349 Title: Please remove nield from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nield/+bug/2079349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068769] Re: yarn FTBFS with node 20
Build failure was fixed in 4.0.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1. (There is still an autopkgtest failure.) ** Changed in: node-yarnpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068769 Title: yarn FTBFS with node 20 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-yarnpkg/+bug/2068769/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive
"stuck in proposed" is not a sufficient rationale for removal, can you elaborate please? ** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079513 Title: Please remove sslh from the archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sslh/+bug/2079513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060818] Re: FTBFS on Noble
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: swiftlang 5.6.3-3 in oracular Comment: FTBFS; LP: #2060818 1 package successfully removed. The build failure may be fixed in swiftlang 5.7.3-1 which should autosync next cycle. ** Changed in: swiftlang (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060818 Title: FTBFS on Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swiftlang/+bug/2060818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069200] Re: RM: gitaly from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1758702 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758702 ** Tags removed: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069200 Title: RM: gitaly from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/+bug/2069200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072723] Re: please remove jupyter-ydoc due to dependency-wait on ypy
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: jupyter-ydoc 1.0.2-2 in oracular Comment: Build-depends on non-existent python3-ypy; LP: #2072723 1 package successfully removed. And added to extra-removals. ** Changed in: jupyter-ydoc (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072723 Title: please remove jupyter-ydoc due to dependency-wait on ypy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-ydoc/+bug/2072723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067729] Re: libpsml-dev: unsatisfiable (Build-)Depends: libxmlf90-dev
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: libpsml 2.0.1-1 in oracular Comment: Build-depends on non-existent libxmlf90-dev; LP: #2067729 1 package successfully removed. and added to extra-removals. ** Changed in: libpsml (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067729 Title: libpsml-dev: unsatisfiable (Build-)Depends: libxmlf90-dev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpsml/+bug/2067729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 2078959] Re: Since upgrade to 24.04.1 LTS login screen shows "23.10"
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:42:56PM -, Bernard Moreton wrote: > Synaptic says for base-files: 13ubuntu10.1 This is the noble version. So I don't know where this 23.10 branding is coming from for you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078959 Title: Since upgrade to 24.04.1 LTS login screen shows "23.10" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/2078959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063062] Re: Please remove src:cryptojs ; unmaintained and deprecated upstream
Ack, thanks, blocking future possible syncs is a good idea. Merge proposal here: https://code.launchpad.net/~sbeattie/+git/sync- blocklist/+merge/472598 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063062 Title: Please remove src:cryptojs ; unmaintained and deprecated upstream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptojs/+bug/2063062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078959] Re: Since upgrade to 24.04.1 LTS login screen shows "23.10"
What version of the base-files package do you have installed? The login screen itself is not from Plymouth. This would normally be from gdm or equivalent. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078959 Title: Since upgrade to 24.04.1 LTS login screen shows "23.10" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/2078959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1597017] Re: mount rules grant excessive permissions
Actual fixed versions for this issue are still sitting in focal-proposed and jammy-proposed. However, we did a no-change rebuild ofthe current versions in the respective updates pockets to the security pocket, so that the version in proposed could be published first in the updates pocket, but leaving people who experience possible issues the opportunity for an easy downgrade path to the prior version (via apt install apparmor/jammy-security or apparmor/focal-security as the case may be). ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597017 Title: mount rules grant excessive permissions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1597017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076929] Re: [SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64, arm64} against new shim
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/20.4/+build/28901983
shows:
Get:63 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 shim-signed
amd64 1.51.4+15.8-0ubuntu1 [668 kB]
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-arm64/16.3/+build/28901984
shows:
Get:62 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu jammy-updates/main arm64 shim-signed
arm64 1.51.4+15.8-0ubuntu1 [559 kB]
Verification done.
(this was a badly-formed test case.)
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076929
Title:
[SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} against new shim
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2076929/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
i386 has been enabled by default on amd64 for quite some time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?
Originally I was going to make the argument that three replacements for dmraid are not on-disk compatible, and therefore the Debian removal rationale is disingenuous for anyone who is upgrading a system that relies on this. However, the fact that this has already been broken for two LTS cycles without any Ubuntu developers noticing and having no capacity to test, and we've effectively had only one user bug report about it, gives lie to the idea that we can let this coast without upstream support and without impact to our users. So I am +1 now for removal; it's better to have a clean drop. We should also add an ubuntu-release-upgrade quirk to block users from upgrading to a release that will not support their disk. Whether that is added to the upgrader going back to upgrades to jammy, or whether we SRU the udev fix to jammy and noble and only block upgrades to oracular and later, I have no opinion. ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677 Title: Remove dmraid from oracular? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
The only thing is, installing updates through the GUI default upgrader is NOT supposed to accept solutions that require removing packages. So this really needs to be tracked down and fixed. I don't think there's anything further to be done in gnome-shell. ** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Ok, sorry for overlooking. Here's what it should look like: $ apt policy gnome-shell gnome-shell: Installed: (none) Candidate: 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 Version table: 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 Packages 42.0-2ubuntu1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages $ The gnome-shell update is published in jammy-updates and in jammy- security, but does not show up in your apt policy output. You somehow have out of date package indices for these repositories - but you DID have an up-to-date package index for i386, which is what caused gnome- shell-common to be visible. How did you trigger the actual update? Was this through the update- manager GUI? Did it offer to install gnome-shell-common for you and remove the other packages? Or did you use apt directly to do this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 2077217] Re: rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command
Forgot to add Found it very difficult to access WWW while these messages were occurring On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:34 Steve Haynes, wrote: > I only noticed the messages that appeared on the terminal > > As a general rule, my laptop is always on the charger because the battery > doesn't hold up very well > > I went back to '39' to fix the problem but went back and forth between > '39' and '40' to double check > > I only get the messages to the terminal on '40' > > Hope this helps > > Regards, > Steve > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:20 Bethany Jamison, <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net> > wrote: > >> Hello Steve, >> Do you notice any decrease in wifi performance when you see these 'failed >> to send h2c command' messages? >> >> I noticed in your dmesg file you also see 'firmware failed to leave lps >> state' around the same time you see the h2c message - this led me to >> this coversation (https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61). Does >> this issue seem similar to yours? This may mean the issue is related to >> power saving. If you feel like your issue is similar to this please >> verify some behavior by following these steps from the thread: >> >> Update: the message flood only happens when laptop charger is not >> connected. >> 1) I connected the charger. The "firmware failed to leave lps state" >> message stopped to appear, but "failed to send h2c command" message still >> continuously flooded my dmesg >> 2) I put laptop to sleep, then wake up. Message flood stopped. >> 3) I disconnected the charger, and after few minutes message started to >> come in again. >> >> Thanks -- Bethany >> >> ** Bug watch added: github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues #61 >>https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61 >> >> -- >> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug >> report. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217 >> >> Title: >> rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command >> >> Status in linux package in Ubuntu: >> New >> >> Bug description: >> 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> 16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c >> command >> >> I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel: >> 6.8.0-40-generic >> >> I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic >> >> ProblemType: Bug >> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 >> Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40 >> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12 >> Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64 >> ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 >> Architecture: amd64 >> AudioDevicesInUse: >>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND >>/dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire >>/dev/snd/controlC0: tigger 2101 F wireplumber >> CRDA: N/A >> CasperMD5CheckResult: pass >> CurrentDesktop: KDE >> Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024 >> InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago) >> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 >> (20231016.1) >> Lsusb: >>Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub >>Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd >> (Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera >>Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek >> Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter >>Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub >> MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx >> ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb >> ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic >> root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 >> PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No >> PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. >> RelatedPackageVersions: >>linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A >
Re: [Bug 2077217] Re: rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command
I only noticed the messages that appeared on the terminal As a general rule, my laptop is always on the charger because the battery doesn't hold up very well I went back to '39' to fix the problem but went back and forth between '39' and '40' to double check I only get the messages to the terminal on '40' Hope this helps Regards, Steve On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:20 Bethany Jamison, <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hello Steve, > Do you notice any decrease in wifi performance when you see these 'failed > to send h2c command' messages? > > I noticed in your dmesg file you also see 'firmware failed to leave lps > state' around the same time you see the h2c message - this led me to > this coversation (https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61). Does > this issue seem similar to yours? This may mean the issue is related to > power saving. If you feel like your issue is similar to this please > verify some behavior by following these steps from the thread: > > Update: the message flood only happens when laptop charger is not > connected. > 1) I connected the charger. The "firmware failed to leave lps state" > message stopped to appear, but "failed to send h2c command" message still > continuously flooded my dmesg > 2) I put laptop to sleep, then wake up. Message flood stopped. > 3) I disconnected the charger, and after few minutes message started to > come in again. > > Thanks -- Bethany > > ** Bug watch added: github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues #61 >https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217 > > Title: > rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > 16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c > command > > I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel: > 6.8.0-40-generic > > I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 > Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12 > Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 > Architecture: amd64 > AudioDevicesInUse: >USERPID ACCESS COMMAND >/dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire >/dev/snd/controlC0: tigger 2101 F wireplumber > CRDA: N/A > CasperMD5CheckResult: pass > CurrentDesktop: KDE > Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 > (20231016.1) > Lsusb: >Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub >Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd > (Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera >Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek > Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter >Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub > MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx > ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic > root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No > PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. > RelatedPackageVersions: >linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A >linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A >linux-firmware > 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.1 > SourcePackage: linux > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-06-03 (75 days ago) > dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2022 > dmi.bios.release: 15.43 > dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde > dmi.bios.version: F.43 > dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag > dmi.board.name: 84A6 > dmi.board.vendor: HP > dmi.board.version: 80.50 > dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag > dmi.chassis.type: 10 > dmi.chassis.vendor: HP > dmi.chassis.version: Cha
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077232] Re: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Upgrade: gnome-shell-common:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1, 42.9-0ubuntu2.2) Remove: gnome-shell:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1), This shows only gnome-shell-common being installed and gnome-shell being removed. What does `apt policy` show for these two packages? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232 Title: Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077217] [NEW] failed to send h2c command
Public bug reported: 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command 16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel: 6.8.0-40-generic I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire /dev/snd/controlC0: tigger 2101 F wireplumber CRDA: N/A CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231016.1) Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd (Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-06-03 (75 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2022 dmi.bios.release: 15.43 dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde dmi.bios.version: F.43 dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 84A6 dmi.board.vendor: HP dmi.board.version: 80.50 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: HP dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.ec.firmware.release: 80.50 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.43:bd11/16/2022:br15.43:efr80.50:svnHP:pnHPLaptop15-da0xxx:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn84A6:rvr80.50:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:sku4BA34EA#ABU: dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV HP Notebook dmi.product.name: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx dmi.product.sku: 4BA34EA#ABU dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId dmi.sys.vendor: HP ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217 Title: failed to send h2c command To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2077217/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
Override component to main sysprof 47~beta-1 in oracular: universe/devel -> main 1 publication overridden. Override component to main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular riscv64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main 7 publications overridden. ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066269 Title: [MIR] sysprof To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/2066269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074204] Re: AppArmor profiles missing for jammy and 6.8 kernel
> It's so weird. Autopkgtest on s390x fails because it can't open > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu.jammy/STRUCTURE, > apparently!? This looks like a firewall problem on the s390x autopkgtest runners. I see that you did a baseline retest with migration-reference/0 and that one landed on a runner in the bos01 region: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- jammy/jammy/s390x/l/livecd-rootfs/20240812_102717_e29f6@/log.gz The failures appear to be in the bos03 region: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- jammy/jammy/s390x/l/livecd-rootfs/20240812_201708_d80bd@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074204 Title: AppArmor profiles missing for jammy and 6.8 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2074204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073919] Re: luit package missing in Ubuntu
$ syncpackage luit Source luit -> oracular/Proposed: not in Ubuntu, new version 2.0.20221028-1 Downloading changelog from launchpadlibrarian.net (0.001 MiB) [=>]100% New changes: luit (2.0.20221028-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Thomas E. Dickey Sun, 30 Oct 2022 20:14:33 -0400 luit (2.0.20220111-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial package release (Closes: #1003130) * Replaces the bundled version of luit in x11-utils which is no longer supported by freedesktop upstream, and will be removed from that package (see https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/luit/tree/README). -- Thomas E. Dickey Mon, 31 Jan 2022 03:50:24 -0500 Sync this package [y|N]? y Request succeeded; you should get an e-mail once it is processed. ** Changed in: luit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073919 Title: luit package missing in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luit/+bug/2073919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074078] Re: [MIR] ubuntu-x13s-settings
Override component to main ubuntu-x13s-settings 24.10.3 in oracular: universe/misc -> main hwe-lenovo-x13s-meta 24.10.3 in oracular arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% -> main ubuntu-x13s-settings 24.10.3 in oracular arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% -> main ubuntu-x13s-settings-nogrub 24.10.3 in oracular arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% -> main 4 publications overridden. ** Changed in: ubuntu-x13s-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074078 Title: [MIR] ubuntu-x13s-settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-x13s-settings/+bug/2074078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Medium Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076023 Title: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket- generator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2076023/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076917] [NEW] gnome-boxes missing dependency
Public bug reported: When installing gnome-boxes it launches but can’t import iso image gives kvm problems looking into it it’s because it’s missing kvm and dependency, so after installing this listed below problem is solved is it possible to add this to future gnome-boxes install as dependency. Thank You qemu-kvm libvirt-daemon-system libvirt-clients bridge-utils ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: gnome-boxes 46.0-1build1 Uname: Linux 6.10.4-061004-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Aug 13 10:11:10 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-08-13 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm-256color XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: gnome-boxes UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-boxes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble third-party-packages wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076917 Title: gnome-boxes missing dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-boxes/+bug/2076917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075168] Re: Please remove django-assets 2.0-3 from oracular
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: django-assets 2.0-3 in oracular Comment: FTBFS with python 3.12; LP: #2075168 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: django-assets (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075168 Title: Please remove django-assets 2.0-3 from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/django-assets/+bug/2075168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075957] Re: Please remove dt-schema from oracular
Removing packages from oracular: dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular amd64 dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular arm64 dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular armhf dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular i386 dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular ppc64el dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular riscv64 dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular s390x Comment: incompatible with newer jsonschema; LP: #2075957 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: dt-schema (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075957 Title: Please remove dt-schema from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dt-schema/+bug/2075957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075957] Re: Please remove dt-schema from oracular
Removing packages from oracular-proposed: dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular amd64 dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular arm64 dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular armhf dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular i386 dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular ppc64el dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular riscv64 dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular s390x Comment: incompatible with newer jsonschema; LP: #2075957 1 package successfully removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075957 Title: Please remove dt-schema from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dt-schema/+bug/2075957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075957] Re: Please remove dt-schema from oracular
check needs to include: $ reverse-depends src:dt-schema No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends src:dt-schema -a source No reverse dependencies found $ looks clear. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075957 Title: Please remove dt-schema from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dt-schema/+bug/2075957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076135] Re: Removal request: r-cran-metamix
Removed from disk 3 hours ago. Removal requested 5 hours ago. Deleted 6 hours ago by Steve Langasek (From Debian) RoM; abandonned upstream; Debian bug #1076676 ** Changed in: r-cran-metamix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076135 Title: Removal request: r-cran-metamix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-metamix/+bug/2076135/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076135] Re: Removal request: r-cran-metamix
(It is normally superfluous to open a removal request bug for a package removed from Debian unstable.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076135 Title: Removal request: r-cran-metamix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-metamix/+bug/2076135/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076187] Re: please remove non-amd64 binaries of cpptraj from Oracular
Removing packages from oracular: cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular arm64 cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular armhf cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular ppc64el cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular s390x Comment: ANAIS 4 packages successfully removed. Not removing the riscv64 binaries; since it doesn't ftbfs they would just grow back. ** Changed in: cpptraj (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076187 Title: please remove non-amd64 binaries of cpptraj from Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpptraj/+bug/2076187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076327] Re: r-cran-dimred: Please RM armhf binaries
Removing packages from oracular: r-cran-dimred 0.2.6-1 in oracular armhf Comment: ANAIS 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: r-cran-dimred (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076327 Title: r-cran-dimred: Please RM armhf binaries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-dimred/+bug/2076327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076342] Re: [MIR] mozjs128
This is a straight swap, so no review needed. Override component to main mozjs128 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/libs -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-128-dev 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main 13 publications overridden. ** Changed in: mozjs128 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076342 Title: [MIR] mozjs128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs128/+bug/2076342/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076378] [NEW] imagemagick jammy/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.22.04.5 introduced failing test case in ruby-rmagick build
Public bug reported: The imagemagick security update jammy/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.22.04.5 made changes that cause ruby- rmagick's build to fail during it's build tests in the following testcase: Failures: 1) Magick::Draw#clip_path works Failure/Error: draw.draw(canvas) Magick::ImageMagickError: unable to open image `7': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2924 ./spec/rmagick/draw/clip_path_spec.rb:29:in `draw' ./spec/rmagick/draw/clip_path_spec.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in ' ** Affects: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076378 Title: imagemagick jammy/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.22.04.5 introduced failing test case in ruby-rmagick build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/2076378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076150] [NEW] apparmor apport python plugin: "invalid escape sequence '\('"
Public bug reported:
Python 3.12 got more strict about quoting in strings that often impacts
regular expressions, and pyflakes on the apparmor apport hooks reports:
$ pyflakes3 debian/apport/source_apparmor.py
debian/apport/source_apparmor.py:61: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence
'\('
sec_re = re.compile('audit\(|apparmor|selinux|security', re.IGNORECASE)
We should use a raw string for this, like so:
diff --git a/debian/apport/source_apparmor.py b/debian/apport/source_apparmor.py
index 33c6a7e0b..2437d0cd4 100644
--- a/debian/apport/source_apparmor.py
+++ b/debian/apport/source_apparmor.py
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ def add_info(report, ui):
attach_file(report, '/proc/version_signature', 'ProcVersionSignature')
attach_file(report, '/proc/cmdline', 'ProcKernelCmdline')
-sec_re = re.compile('audit\(|apparmor|selinux|security', re.IGNORECASE)
+sec_re = re.compile(r'audit\(|apparmor|selinux|security', re.IGNORECASE)
report['KernLog'] = recent_kernlog(sec_re)
# DBus messages are reported to syslog
dbus_sec_re = re.compile('dbus.* apparmor', re.IGNORECASE)
The intent here is to match logs with the strings 'audit(', 'apparmor',
'selinux', or 'security'
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076150
Title:
apparmor apport python plugin: "invalid escape sequence '\('"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2076150/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075968] Re: cannot login after upgrade from xubuntu 22.04 to 24.04
Prior to upgrade, was this system configured for passwordless login? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075968 Title: cannot login after upgrade from xubuntu 22.04 to 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2075968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2043820] Re: Unable to contact snap store on Xubuntu from Jammy to Noble
Did you rule out the option of early-install'in systemd-resolved during the upgrade? Then there wouldn't need to be special-casing of resolv.conf because it wouldn't be "gone" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043820 Title: Unable to contact snap store on Xubuntu from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2043820/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467 Title: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2036467/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075247] Re: gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available
I'll try to reproduce with a clean profile when I have a moment. In the meantime, could you tell me what systemd user unit the process is part of on your system? I don't see anything in the gvfs-fuse package itself that would start it as part of a user session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075247 Title: gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/2075247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075247] [NEW] gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available
Public bug reported: gvfs-fuse remains part of the Ubuntu Desktop in 24.04, however, I see in my session that it is not running and as a result there are no mounts available. I have Android mobile devices that I expect to be able to access via fuse. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: gvfs-fuse 1.54.0-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-38.38-generic 6.8.8 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-38-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Jul 30 11:58:45 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-23 (1681 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017) RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: gvfs UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-05-22 (69 days ago) modified.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: [modified] mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2024-05-23T16:12:43.275502 ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075247 Title: gvfs-fused not running on noble, mounts not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/2075247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046486] Re: units with credentials fail in LXD containers
latest/edge is not what we use (nor what we should use) in production. When should we expect this to reach the default stable channels used on Ubuntu LTSes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046486 Title: units with credentials fail in LXD containers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2046486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073359] Re: [SRU] Copy u-boot-pic64gx to Noble
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted u-boot-pic64gx into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot- pic64gx/2024.06-0ubuntu1~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: u-boot-pic64gx (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073359 Title: [SRU] Copy u-boot-pic64gx to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot-pic64gx/+bug/2073359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073712] [NEW] gfeeds crashes when viewing any article
Public bug reported: gfeeds loads normally, but crashes whenever I attempt to view any article. CLI output is as follows: Loaded stored blocklist m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 252 group.slots() = 3 -> 258> slot_limit = 256 m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 256 group.slots() = 2 -> 260> slot_limit = 256 m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 256 group.slots() = 3 -> 262> slot_limit = 256 m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 252 group.slots() = 3 -> 258> slot_limit = 256 m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 256 group.slots() = 2 -> 260> slot_limit = 256 m_bc->cf_last->ndw = 256 group.slots() = 3 -> 262> slot_limit = 256 bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied ** (org.gabmus.gfeeds:339549): ERROR **: 08:44:11.816: Failed to fully launch dbus-proxy: Child process exited with code 1 Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped) I searched for the error message and came across https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2046844 - setting up the AppArmor profile as detailed there has fixed my issue. lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Release:24.04 apt-cache policy gnome-feeds gnome-feeds: Installed: 2.2.0-3 ** Affects: gnome-feeds (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073712 Title: gfeeds crashes when viewing any article To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-feeds/+bug/2073712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066931] Re: Primary GPU displays nothing if the secondary GPU is using nouveau in a Wayland session
Have confirmed that with the mutter from noble-proposed, I'm able to drop the 'WaylandEnable=false' line from /etc/gdm3/custom.conf and do get a login screen (shown on the internal display only). ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066931 Title: Primary GPU displays nothing if the secondary GPU is using nouveau in a Wayland session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2066931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069360] Re: apport-autoreport.service fails if autoreporting is disabled
> 1. Disable auto-reporting in the system setting This doesn't look like a test case that can be followed by someone unfamiliar with the software. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069360 Title: apport-autoreport.service fails if autoreporting is disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2069360/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072643] Re: Embedded camera using camera sensors ov02e10 and ov08a10 doesn't work: missing kernel driver
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected, Accepted ipu6-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/0~git202406240945.aecec2aa-0ubuntu2~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072643 Title: Embedded camera using camera sensors ov02e10 and ov08a10 doesn't work: missing kernel driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2072643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073453] Re: Failed to enable camera on Dell XPS 9320: ov01a10 i2c-OVTI01A0:00: failed to check hwcfg: -22
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted ipu6-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/0~git202406240945.aecec2aa-0ubuntu2~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ipu6-drivers (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073453 Title: Failed to enable camera on Dell XPS 9320: ov01a10 i2c-OVTI01A0:00: failed to check hwcfg: -22 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/+bug/2073453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072643] Re: Embedded camera using camera sensors ov02e10 and ov08a10 doesn't work: missing kernel driver
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
[Impact]
Device camera won't work.
[Fix]
The current version in -proposed pocket may skip installation of built
kernel module ov02e10 and ov08a10. The fix is to use fixed index numbers
in dkms.conf.
[Test Case]
Install the dkms and check if ov02e10.ko and ov08a10.ko have been
installed to /lib/modules//updates/dkms.
[Where problems could occur]
- No.
+ Minimal, as this is restoring driver modules that were previously
+ installed prior to the regression.
[Other Info]
While this happens to ipu6-drivers/{oracualr,noble} only, proposed fixes
are therefore nominated accordingly.
== original bug report =
Description: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Release: 22.04
linux-oem-22.04d 6.5.0.1026.28
com.canonical.certification::camera/camera-quality_video0 test fails:
[ WARN:0] global ./modules/videoio/src/cap_gstreamer.cpp (1100) open OpenCV |
GStreamer warning: Cannot query video position: status=0, value=-1, duration=-1
/bin/sh: 1: kill: Illegal number: -
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/tmp/nest-oh_l6kjy.e6eacba27b81ed7929f808c3af9ceaf803facf6256ab97b917f65943c394f09d/camera_quality_test.py",
line 178, in
sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/checkbox_support/helpers/timeout.py",
line 93, in _f
return run_with_timeout(f, timeout_s, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/checkbox_support/helpers/timeout.py",
line 78, in run_with_timeout
raise TimeoutError("Task unable to finish in {}s".format(timeout_s))
TimeoutError: Task unable to finish in 120s
It passed on 6.5.1024.25 on the same device.
It fails on all Dell Oasis MTL machines
202312-33186 (usbio, ov02e10)
202312-33187 (usbio, ov02e10)
202312-33214 (usbio, hi556, checkbox test pass)
202312-33215 (usbio, hi556, checkbox test pass)
202312-32371 (usbio, hi556, checkbox test pass)
202312-32372 (usbio, ov02e10)
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-image-6.5.0-1026-oem 6.5.0-1026.27
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-1026.27-oem 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-1026-oem x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Wed Jul 10 06:38:38 2024
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
# This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
# For more information see
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
canonical-oem-somerville-jammy-amd64-20220504-33+jellyfish-oddish13+X120
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-02-27 (134 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" -
somerville-jammy-amd64-20220504-33
SourcePackage: linux-signed-oem-6.5
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Tags removed: regression-proposed
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072643
Title:
Embedded camera using camera sensors ov02e10 and ov08a10 doesn't work:
missing kernel driver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2072643/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073554] Re: Grub2 Support for KVM on PowerVM
** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073554 Title: Grub2 Support for KVM on PowerVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2073554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058192] Re: [MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock
** Tags added: sec-4736 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058192 Title: [MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2058192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071717] Re: [MIR] linuxptp
** Tags added: sec-4733 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071717 Title: [MIR] linuxptp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+bug/2071717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072811] Re: Apparmor: New update broke flatpak with `apparmor="DENIED"`
'apt show -a' shows you all available versions apt knows about, it does not tell you what's installed. You want 'dpkg -l apparmor' (or 'apt policy apparmor'). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072811 Title: Apparmor: New update broke flatpak with `apparmor="DENIED"` To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2072811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072490] Re: [needs-packaging] U-Boot for Microchip PIC64GX
arch/riscv/cpu/mpfs/cpu.c, arch/riscv/cpu/mpfs/dram.c, arch/riscv/cpu/pic64gx/cpu.c, arch/riscv/cpu/pic64gx/dram.c are new files in u-boot-pic64gx-20240624 listed as 'Copyright (C) 2018, Bin Meng '. Please include this in debian/copyright. arch/riscv/dts/mpfs-tysom-m.dts lists Copyright (C) 2020-2022 - Aldec which is not in debian/copyright. (It also lists Copyright (C) 2022-2023 - Conor Dooley but we can presume this is incorrect and should be Microchip, which is listed in debian/copyright.) I also see that this source builds an Arch: all binary package. The convention is that the u-boot binary packages declare the architectures that they are used on (riscv64); we don't want to install u-boot-pic64gx on an amd64 system. Ok to leave drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c in the source. And diffing debian/copyright against the Debian v2023.07 package instead of the latest looks sensible, so no changes needed there. That leaves the above three issues, plus the upstream version problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072490 Title: [needs-packaging] U-Boot for Microchip PIC64GX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2072490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072490] Re: [needs-packaging] U-Boot for Microchip PIC64GX
u-boot-pic64gx_2024.06 well, somewhat unfortunate wrt license review that this doesn't align with any of the u-boot upstream tags; I guess I'll compare with 2024.04... The u-boot source package has in debian/copyright: Files-Excluded: drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c u-boot-pic64gx does not. Do you know why this was excluded in the Debian u-boot package, and why it would be ok to ship it in the pic64gx build? If not, I recommend that you follow the u-boot source package's lead to avoid any doubts. There's also an 8kloc diff between the debian/copyright in u-boot 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5 and the one in u-boot-pic64gx 20240624-0ubuntu1. That is a rather significant barrier to using u-boot as a base for review of correct licensing / copyright declaration of the new package. Can you explain this difference? Also, speaking of '20240624-0ubuntu1' - note that this is not consistent with the versioning scheme used by the u-boot source package; 20240624 sorts >> the .MM style version numbers. This will make it difficult to later build the u-boot-pic64gx binary out of the u-boot source package due to inconsistent version numbers. I suggest you avoid this now by packaging this instead as 2024.06.24-0ubuntu1. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072490 Title: [needs-packaging] U-Boot for Microchip PIC64GX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2072490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2044104] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initramfs even with zdev:early=0 set
oracular has s390-tools 2.33.1-0ubuntu3. Is there any further change needed on that package, or should that task be marked resolved? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104 Title: [UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initramfs even with zdev:early=0 set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2044104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
+ * Fixed the symbolic links with libssl3t64. (LP: #2067672) This is insufficiently clear as a changelog entry for an SRU. I am adjusting this to: + * Fixed the symbolic link target for the changelog and copyright files. (LP: #2067672) Otherwise, this is straightforward and I am sponsoring to the noble SRU queue. However, in terms of SRU policy, I don't think it makes sense for us to release an SRU of openssl to all users' systems that changes only this. Therefore I am tagging this bug 'block-proposed-noble' so that it will not actually be released to noble-updates until there are further changes to be landed. ** Tags added: block-proposed-noble ** Description changed: [ Impact ] - * In OEM projects, our customers need check every copyright of - packages. + Due to the t64 transition, the changelog.Debian.gz and copyright + symlinks in various binary packages built from openssl source are + dangling symlinks, because /usr/share/doc/libssl3 no longer exists. + This gives users an error when trying to look at these files, and is an + impediment to inspecting the copyright status of the packages in an + installed system. [ Test Plan ] - * list the openssl or libssl-dev to check if symbol link is valid. -$ l -thal /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/ -$ l -thal /usr/share/doc/openssl/ -$ file /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/copyright -$ file /usr/share/doc/openssl/copyright + * list the openssl or libssl-dev to check if symbol link is valid. + $ l -thal /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/ + $ l -thal /usr/share/doc/openssl/ + $ file /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/copyright + $ file /usr/share/doc/openssl/copyright [ Where problems could occur ] - * It didn't affects any functions, just the symbol links are misssing. + * It didn't affects any functions, just the symbol links are misssing. [ Other Info ] - Currently it link to the old version libssl3, currently libssl3 is purely virtual. + Currently it link to the old version libssl3, currently libssl3 is purely virtual. $ l -thal /usr/share/doc/openssl-dev/ lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 30 May 14 17:06 changelog.Debian.gz -> ../libssl3/changelog.Debian.gz lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 May 14 17:06 changelog.gz -> ../libssl3/changelog.gz lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 May 14 17:06 copyright -> ../libssl3/copyright $ l -thal /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/ total 84K drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4.0K May 23 16:08 ./ drwxr-xr-x 2180 root root 76K May 16 20:13 ../ lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 30 May 14 17:06 changelog.Debian.gz -> ../libssl3/changelog.Debian.gz lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 May 14 17:06 changelog.gz -> ../libssl3/changelog.gz lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 May 14 17:06 copyright -> ../libssl3/copyright -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
Per the above comment this is reported to be fixed in 3.2.2-1ubuntu1 which is in oracular-proposed, so setting the status to 'fix committed'. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records
What is the status of this bug in noble? It needs to be resolved for noble before we can SRU it to jammy and focal. ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024258 Title: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2024258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
