[Bug 1561260] Re: xfce4-volumed causes volume popups frequently in XFCE
This is a bug somewhere in between your hardware and PulseAudio. To help diagnose the exact faulty component, I would try to: (a) stop using PulseAudio (b) use a significantly older kernel / distro (c) use another computer / sound card In any case xvd is only making the symptoms of a deeper issue visible, rather than causing said issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561260 Title: xfce4-volumed causes volume popups frequently in XFCE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1561260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1477983] [NEW] Zeitgeist plugin read/write after free on datasource registration
Public bug reported: The Zeitgeist plugin creates a GPtrArray to give to libzeitgeist when registering a Zeitgeist datasource. libzeitgeist internally sinks this reference, but the plugin assumes the GPtrArray to still be available and later attempts to unref it. The attached patch adds a reference to the GPtrArray to keep it available until the end of the plugin's initialisation code, where it is unrefed. The patch is designed to integrate with quilt on top of gedit 3.10.4-0ubuntu10. The upstream bug report is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824. ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "fix_read_after_free.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477983/+attachment/4433604/+files/fix_read_after_free.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477983 Title: Zeitgeist plugin read/write after free on datasource registration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1477983/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232987] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in zeitgeist_queued_proxy_wrapper_wait_for_proxy_co()
Please try the patch attached in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824, see if it helps. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #752824 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232987 Title: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in zeitgeist_queued_proxy_wrapper_wait_for_proxy_co() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1232987/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1382792] Re: gedit crashes when zeitgeist plugin is disabled
Please try the patch attached in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824, see if it helps. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #752824 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382792 Title: gedit crashes when zeitgeist plugin is disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1382792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1273230] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in zeitgeist_log_insert_event_no_reply()
Please try the patch attached in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824, see if it helps. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #752824 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752824 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273230 Title: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in zeitgeist_log_insert_event_no_reply() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1273230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439685] Re: Please update package to 3.14.3
Let me copy/paste the upstream changelog for you: * fix crashes related to images support And that's it. Diff between 3.14.2 and 3.14.3 attached. No new features. If you don't package it for Ubuntu Vivid now, I will because I need it -- but I won't do it properly because I don't understand the mysteries of Debian packaging. Your GNOME users will probably end up filling bug reports and you'll need to do a SRU later anyway :-) ** Patch added: "gpaste-3.14.3.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaste/+bug/1439685/+attachment/4372906/+files/gpaste-3.14.3.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439685 Title: Please update package to 3.14.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaste/+bug/1439685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439923] Re: GTK does not build because gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_menu_item does not always return a value
I've just checked upstream GTK, and these two methods only exist in Ubuntu. They come from the patch named debian/patches/ubuntu_gtk_custom_menu_items.patch Cheers, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439923 Title: GTK does not build because gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_menu_item does not always return a value To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1439923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439923] [NEW] GTK does not build because gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_menu_item does not always return a value
Public bug reported: Tested version: 3.14.11-0ubuntu1 Bug most likely introduced in: 3.10.6-0ubuntu1 gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_menu_item and gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_action_namespace both have return types, but use g_return_if_fail instead of g_return_val_if_fail. Attached is a diff of the change I made to make my Clang build the package, although you might want to verify whether returning NULL is correct (I have no idea what GtkMenuTrackerItem is). ** Affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "fix_return_value.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439923/+attachment/4364835/+files/fix_return_value.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439923 Title: GTK does not build because gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_menu_item does not always return a value To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1439923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439685] [NEW] Please update package to 3.14.3
Public bug reported: Hi, Upstream has released a bugfix version that fixes several systematic memory corruptions when copying images. Without this update, 3.14.2 is unstable and crashes regularly. The bug fix is the only item in this release's changelog. I'm personally interested in having a vivid package but you might want to consider a SRU for other distros. Upstream release statement: http://www.imagination- land.org/posts/2015-03-21-gpaste-3.14.3-released.html Thanks. ** Affects: gpaste (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439685 Title: Please update package to 3.14.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaste/+bug/1439685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256110]
In what sense is that bug fixed? I don't understand how I am supposed to open a terminal for the current folder in the list view. Is it an accident? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256110 Title: Missing terminal and search in right click menu (detail view) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1256110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256110]
Reopening the report. A note to devs / people willing to write a patch: the location bar, in "button" mode, provides a facility to paste into folder. It does not when in "toolbar" mode, but e.g. the folder icon directly left of the path could be given a right click menu *identical* to the buttons in the other location bar mode. That'd provide at least a hidden way to provide this (and future) feature(s). One could also add a "Parent Folder" submenu to items in the list (right after/before the actions, but not at the end since the end is a convenient shortcut for Properties) and give that parent folder the *same* content as location bar buttons. Any other Design SIG input is very welcome... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256110 Title: Missing terminal and search in right click menu (detail view) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1256110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1077970]
Reopening as the patch has had unwanted side effects, as per Evangelos' last comment -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077970 Title: exo-open fails when html filename contains spaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/exo/+bug/1077970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069387]
I was informed that this feature is part of the latest Xfwm release. I'm closing the report as FIXED. If you think there's something incorrect or missing, please re-open it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069387 Title: tiling should also resize to a quarter of the desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1069387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1347087]
Bumping the people on this report: if you can experience the bug, please try the patch before 4.12 to spare your fellow users some trouble :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347087 Title: Xubuntu Desktop Settings no wallpaper choices shown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfdesktop/+bug/1347087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294209]
Is the freeze caused by the Thunar daemon needing time to spawn, or by something else? I have a completely unrelated instance of calling D-Bus via Thunar causing the caller to freeze (Firefox when opening the current folder, according to Mozilla folks currently debugging their use of the FileManager1 D-Bus interface). Could it be that we should fix an issue in Thunar instead, and that this would take care of the freeze? As I understand it, the progress dialog can be useful when deleting large files from the desktop. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294209 Title: Deleting files from desktop freezes machine for short period To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfdesktop/+bug/1294209/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327791]
*** Bug 7596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327791 Title: Security warning about just created Xubuntu desktop shortcut To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1327791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1377569]
Waiting to see if Olivier's recommendation works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1377569 Title: Window focus does not always switch to new window even when this is the setting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1377569/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271883]
Hopefully noone else than elfy noticed this regression of sorts. I'm closing the report as WONTFIX since we don't plan to do anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271883 Title: Workspace Settings number keys do not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1271883/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271861]
Could someone please make sure this patch is pushed? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271861 Title: "Open with 'default app'" in right click context menu with wrong icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1271861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271861]
Closing the report then. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271861 Title: "Open with 'default app'" in right click context menu with wrong icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1271861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031581]
Eric: Will you have any chance to look again at this patch and issue in the future? Should I assign it to you? Everyone else: could others test the patch and see what it does for them, to help Eric? There could be several issues aggregated under the same report, this happens quite often. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031581 Title: Tumblerd and Marlin use all available cpu and more To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/marlin/+bug/1031581/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319029]
Is the freeze caused by the Thunar daemon needing time to spawn, or by something else? I have a completely unrelated instance of calling D-Bus via Thunar causing the caller to freeze (Firefox when opening the current folder, according to Mozilla folks currently debugging their use of the FileManager1 D-Bus interface). Could it be that we should fix an issue in Thunar instead, and that this would take care of the freeze? As I understand it, the progress dialog can be useful when deleting large files from the desktop. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319029 Title: Deleting files from desktop freezes machine for short period To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfdesktop/+bug/1319029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316645]
Marking as fixed, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316645 Title: [Tasklist plugin] Grouped icons sometimes are wrongly rendered as a mini-icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-panel/+bug/1316645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316653]
Please try to git apply --check yourpatch.patch before submitting, to spot and remove all trailing whitespaces :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316653 Title: [Tasklist plugin] Grouped icons are not rendered with transparent effect when their child are all minimized. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-panel/+bug/1316653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316653]
Otherwise, just as for Andre: neither patch 5465 or 5466 fix the reported issue. They appear to be doing nothing. Amigamagic, could you please tell us how you tested this patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316653 Title: [Tasklist plugin] Grouped icons are not rendered with transparent effect when their child are all minimized. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-panel/+bug/1316653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1387695]
Should I mark this report as RESOLVED FIXED? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387695 Title: File size displayed wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1387695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1387695]
Looking back at the patch, I don't think the misc-file-size-binary key is important enough to have a UI setting of its own (introduced in the patch). Any views on that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387695 Title: File size displayed wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1387695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1013945]
sankeytms: is there any chance that you rebase your patch on the new xfce4-power-manager (git trunk)? It has undergone a rewrite and I'm not sure your patch would still apply. If you're satisfied that you have a working patch, I will test it for you and nag the developers to have it released. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013945 Title: Let user select a time of less than 15 mins idle before going to sleep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1013945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1013945]
Hi, Thanks for the new patches! I tested on ArchLinux 3.18 64Bits and the exponential slider feels *much* better to use. You're on the way to making a very nice contribution :-) A couple of comments below: - Somehow I cannot go further than 5h40. Is that expected? I would have expected 6 hours (old GUI was 5h50). Could you please round this to 6? - Keyboard navigation should always increment by at least one. You could make the keyboard event handler move the slider by several increments until it reaches a higher mapped value, though that would be computationally wasteful. Ideally, computed the next mapped slider value that should be used from the existing value in one calculation - pow is supported on _BSD_SOURCE || _SVID_SOURCE || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 600 || _ISOC99_SOURCE || _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L; @Core Developers, Distributors: is there a system for which using pow would be a problem? - Could you please create a DEFINE for the min and max values in the code? And then, when storing to xfconf, could you please map the min/"Never" value to 0 instead of what it actually is? And when you load 0 from Xfconf, map it to whichever slider value will show "Never" See below for why - @XFPM Maintainers: Distributors must be warned that they *must* map existing Xfconf keys valued 14 onto a value of 0 or 4 from now on. This is because 14 means "Never" (it's below the minimum which is 15). However, when shortening the min delay to 4, 14 is then read like a normal valid duration. In an ideal world, you would provide a patch for: - moving from 14 to a defined value, and handling the storing 0 in xfconf bit - replacing the existing 15 minutes by 5 minutes (and also to change the values in the .ui for which you can't rely on a define) - implementing the logarithmic slider with working keyboard navigation This way if developers want to delay changing the minimum slider value (because of the 14 minute glitch), they can still apply your other changes. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013945 Title: Let user select a time of less than 15 mins idle before going to sleep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1013945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308105]
Raj, Thanks for clarifying. There might have been several sources of crashes in the same report. Could the people who commented on this report test whether Xfce4-Settings git (hence with Olivier's recent fix) + Alexander's patch work well for them? Olivier, André: would you like to take ownership of this bug and push whichever additional patch is required? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308105 Title: Xfce resets TV mode to NULL when power cycled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1308105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308105]
Raj, Thanks for clarifying. There might have been several sources of crashes in the same report. Could the people who commented on this report test whether Xfce4-Settings git (hence with Olivier's recent fix) + Alexander's patch work well for them? Olivier, André: would you like to take ownership of this bug and push whichever additional patch is required? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308105 Title: Xfce resets TV mode to NULL when power cycled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1308105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308105]
Glad to hear it's fixed for you. Looking at the two commits, XfceOutputInfo *output was probably unitialised, causing a NULL check to be ignored and a SEGFAULT. Thanks for this thorough testing and debugging, Liviu. I'll close this issue, please do open another report for your Mirror Display issue, and mark it high -- I've spotted some variable initialisation bugs in that code too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308105 Title: Xfce resets TV mode to NULL when power cycled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1308105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733563]
I would actually like to see a patch that simply uses the system font, and dumps any internal reference to a font. Having plugins use a custom font for such an unimportant thing causes usability issues since users who do need a high contrast font must search through multiple UIs to fix the fonts. The Whiskermenu and Clock plugins can be used as examples. They both use the system font. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733563 Title: Can't change font for keyboard layout indicator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xkb/+bug/733563/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1252655]
Tested, works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252655 Title: Thunar assigns date stamp of deleted file when previous (e.g. original) copy of file copied or moved into directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1252655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308105]
Hi Liviu, Let us know in a few days if the bug is fixed with the patch, and if no side effects were found, so we can release it in time for 4.12. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308105 Title: Xfce resets TV mode to NULL when power cycled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1308105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395547] Re: xfsettingsd and xfce4-volumed using a lot of CPU after screen lock / unlock
The bug would be rejected against upstream xfce4-volumed with the information available so far. I cannot fix bugs that I cannot reproduce. It could help to report against xfce4-settings. Note the following though: So far the following conditions are known to trigger the bug: OS: Ubuntu 14.10 64bits GPU: AMD ??? Keyboard: ??? Layout: ??? Concurrent software that binds keys: ??? X11 version: ??? I don't have Ubuntu and AMD and so I cannot reproduce the bug. I strongly suspect that the issue is not just with xfce4 apps though but with key binding or key pressing, e.g., a X11/driver bug that is triggered (by some unknown conditions) and causes apps that bind keys to freeze. OP, could you please attach a 'lshw' output and bring this bug report to the attention of X11 Ubuntu maintainers? They might have seen something similar for GNOME/KDE/Unity users. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395547 Title: xfsettingsd and xfce4-volumed using a lot of CPU after screen lock / unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1395547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1402036] [NEW] Mugshot authentication failed
Public bug reported: Whenever I attempt to save details with mugshot, I get asked for a password. Typing the root password results in "Incorrect password" after a 1-2 seconds lag. Typing my user account password results in a 5ish second freeze, then followed by an error dialog stating "Authentication Failed". There is apparently no way to get Mugshot to save anything. Happy to debug/test if told how to do/given code to try. mugshot 0.2.3 ArchLinux Linux 3.17.3-1-ARCH ** Affects: mugshot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1402036 Title: Mugshot authentication failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mugshot/+bug/1402036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395547] Re: xfsettingsd and xfce4-volumed using a lot of CPU after screen lock / unlock
If that's any useful, some of the bug reports I've had with xfce4-volumed were related to how (now defunct) libkeybinder handles keyboard layout changes. Are such changes (even from/to the same layout) triggerred by switching to whatever launcher Xubuntu uses? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395547 Title: xfsettingsd and xfce4-volumed using a lot of CPU after screen lock / unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1395547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327791]
(In reply to Pjotr from comment #14) > Speaking strictly from a user's point of view: it just makes no sense, to > issue a warning and require the granting of executability rights, for the > innocent act of launching an application by clicking a desktop shortcut. No > sense at all > > This is needlessly confusing for beginners and very user-unfriendly. As far > as I know, Xfce is the only desktop environment that does this. > > It's no show-stopper bug of course, but it displeases some new Xfce users to > the point that they stop seeing Xfce as a good alternative for other > desktops. > > Please remove this nasty "paper cut" from Xfce Please don't copy and paste comments across bug reports, and please make sure you're up-to-date with the discussion :-) The current proposal I made is that there will never be any warning on the Desktop, unless it is also used as a Downloads directory (in which case no difference can be made between Downloads and app shortcuts. Warning about the risks inherent to the execution of unknown software is certainly not a pleasant experience, but it remains a necessary first step to help our users build the right mental models of malware and adopt safer practices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327791 Title: Security warning about just created Xubuntu desktop shortcut To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1327791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327791]
The distinction between exec/non-exec bits is pretty irrelevant until sandboxing is fully deployed, to be honest. We cannot both provide security *and* a good UX for locally installed apps and .desktop files on the Desktop for now, so I'm tempted to go with good UX and revisit the decision later. Some pseudo-code: 1a. Make a safe-list of directories with all of PATH, /usr/local/share/applications, /usr/share/applications, ~/.local/share/applications/, ~/Desktop 1b. Remove XDG_DOWNLOADS_DIR from the safe-list (to keep users who download to Desktop a bit safer) 2a. Whenever a bin/sh/desktop file is launched, retrieve location 2b. If location in safe-list, goto Execute (3) 2c. Else if exec-bit not set, goto Warning (4) 2d. Else if xfconf-key "script-launch-behaviour" set to Execute, goto Execute (3) 2d. Else if xfconf-key "script-launch-behaviour" set to Edit, goto Edit (6) 2e. Else if xfconf-key "script-launch-behaviour" set to Ask, goto ValidateExecute (5) 2f. Goto Warning (4) if the code branch ever reaches that point (secure programming, caters for future mistakes when refactoring) 3a. If script/bin, exec with a startup notification 3b. Else forward desktop file to utility that already handles it properly 4a. Warning dialog pops up, "**You are about to run a script(sh)/application(bin+desktop) of unknown origin.**" "It could be used to steal your data or break your computer. Only proceed if you trust the source of this file." 4b. "Help" button to Thunar doc (7) 4c. "Keep me safe" button that cancels -> make it explicit this is the safe option 4d. "Edit script/.desktop file/binary" button, see (6) 4e. "Run anyway" button that runs the file 5a. Info dialog pops up "**File XXX is a script/application**" "Thunar protects you from accidental script/application executions. You can change change this behaviour in ." 5b. "Help" button to Thunar doc (7) 5c. "Cancel" 5d. "Edit script/.desktop file/binary" button, see (6) 5e. "Run" button 6a. This is both the logic to decide if we are able to provide an editor and to implement Edit, because I'm not sure how xdg-open handles scripts since they don't have a MIME Handler 6b. For script/desktop files, search for text/plain and text/xml handlers, for binaries application/octet-stream handlers 6c. Display "Edit" buttons only when a handler is found 6d. For "script-launch-behaviour" = Edit, when no handler is found, launch xdg-open to present the default app selection dialog so the user knows Thunar did its job 7a. Add a doc page to Thunar doc on the implemented behaviour 7b. Explain what warning protects users from, that users should ensure they trust sources of unknown bins and should be careful with pseudo/anonymous sources, should feel free to ask for help to community if unsure, recommend preferring packaged apps as they can be verified by the community 7c. Explain safe-list disables security warning 7d. Explain exec-bit disables security warning 7e. Explain settings keys and provide UI walkthrough to change settings Please, your input on: - Should "ValidateExecute" be the default for script/bin/desktop with exec-bit outside the safe-list? I argue that yes because it avoids accidental executions. - I would discuss a xfconf key to enable the "Edit" button in the warning, as novice users are unlikely to know how to edit a script and advanced users know how to change their settings. Ideally we need usage data to know if many users want to edit their scripts and if we're gonna piss those users off. A disabled option allows distros to adapt to their userbase, though. - Verifying compatible apps could be done with https://developer.gnome.org/gio/stable/GAppInfo.html or "xdg-mime query default" (bad, scripting) - "Don't ask in the future" types of options are usually bad. They provide immediate rewards but then users don't know how to restore behaviour, whilst gettings users into the settings in the first place teaches them where to revert the options Ping me if something's poorly justified/controversial and I'll comment below. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327791 Title: Security warning about just created Xubuntu desktop shortcut To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1327791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327791]
(In reply to Yves-Alexis Perez from comment #12)
> (In reply to Steve Dodier-Lazaro from comment #11)
> > The distinction between exec/non-exec bits is pretty irrelevant until
> > sandboxing is fully deployed, to be honest. We cannot both provide security
> > *and* a good UX for locally installed apps and .desktop files on the Desktop
> > for now, so I'm tempted to go with good UX and revisit the decision later.
>
> I disagree about “pretty irrelevant”. In a secure world you'd have complete
> W^X and thus would refuse to execute anything where the user has write
> access. But even doing that road, it looks logical (at least to me) to
> refuse to execute user stuff with no explicit execute permission.
Essentially we have two threats: malicious downloads and malicious apps.
If apps are malicious then anything $HOME is unsafe, and the exec bit is
totally meaningless. If only considering malicious downloads, I could
create a malicious archive with files that already contain the exec-bit
set, so at the end of the day we're only protecting against standalone
files on systems with a default umask. The distinction isn't
particularly impressive. With proper (i.e., research grade for now and
years to come) sandboxing on, you could tell from which app a file was
downloaded, from which domain it came and whether you have a record of
security issues with its advertised publisher. We're far from there yet.
:-)
What I mean is that the difference *really does not set a security
boundary*. It's purely heuristics-based, to match the most common
scenario. On the day someone actively tries to distribute Linux malware,
this reasoning will blow apart and we'll have to serve systematic
warnings.
> >
> > Some pseudo-code:
> > 1a. Make a safe-list of directories with all of PATH,
> > /usr/local/share/applications, /usr/share/applications,
> > ~/.local/share/applications/, ~/Desktop
>
> I don't think anything under $HOME should be really safe (even in $PATH).
I agree with you, again it's a heuristics-based judgement which should
be revisited as soon as evidence suggests our users are threatened and a
warning could help. Hopefully basic sandboxing will be deployed by then
so ~/.local/{bin,share} will not be writable by user apps.
>
> > 1b. Remove XDG_DOWNLOADS_DIR from the safe-list (to keep users who download
> > to Desktop a bit safer)
>
> It seems that browsers now also set some extended attributes on downloaded
> files, so it might be interesting to support that (but I don't have any
> pointer here).
Hmm, that's a good idea. Though, I'm not sure how many P2P apps/IM
apps/browsers/direct downloads cohabit on the Linux ecosystem. Detecting file
downloads at scale might be painful or unreliable.
In summary, for decision makers:
If Xfce wants to commit to security now in prevision for later, it should not
include any $HOME paths into the safe-list, it should replace the
"ValidateExecute" path with the "Warning" path and set
"script-launch-behaviour" to ask/warn by default. My recommendation would be to
be a bit nicer but to be ready to release stricter defaults in the future as
facilities become available or risks become tangible. Of course we should
support as much OEM customisation as we reasonably can.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327791
Title:
Security warning about just created Xubuntu desktop shortcut
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1327791/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1397353] Re: xfce4: Typo in the french "suspend" translation
The bug appears fixed in Transifex master. If still occurring on Xubuntu's development version, it's a local bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397353 Title: xfce4: Typo in the french "suspend" translation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-panel/+bug/1397353/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 800918]
I used to be able to select one or two wallpapers on top of the "default" directory, allowing quick comparisons between 2/3 wallpapers I liked, and allowing building lists of wallpapers from different sources. I believe symlinks are not obvious and take more time to do than picking multiple sources, so I would also like for this feature to be added. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800918 Title: Some wallpaper/backdrops ideas To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfdesktop/+bug/800918/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054407]
Newest patch applied in commit bbc5f465bbb3743bdc755b4add311281055c9158. Marking as resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054407 Title: xfhelp4 is not installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce-screenshooter-plugin/+bug/1054407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303404]
(In reply to Harald Judt from comment #2) > Some sort of drawback with that hack is that the shortcuts are now displayed > as if the modifier had been pressed. Examples: is displayed as > A, as A. Verifying in xfce4-settings-editor, it is stored > properly as a and it works correctly too. Isn't that just how the UI displays all shortcuts? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303404 Title: Hotkeys with modifier overriding each other To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxfce4ui/+bug/1303404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303404]
I've done a bit of testing just now and could not reproduce the issue in the way it is described. Steps to reproduce: 1) Assign command "A" to key "A" e.g., notify-send "no mods" 2) Assign command "S" to key "Super+A" e.g., notify-send "super" 3) Assign command "C" to key "Ctrl+Super+A" e.g., notify-send "ctrl+super" 4) Keep in mind Ctrl+A is already assigned to Select All 5* Press A, notice command S runs instead of command A 6) Press Super+A, command S runs 7) Press Ctrl+A, Select All is performed on focused selectable 8) Press Ctrl+Super+A, command C runs Analysis: libfxce4ui treats input coming without modifiers as if it had the "Super" modifier. However, the presence of another modifier will prevent libxfce4ui from ignoring the fact that "Super" isn't set. Expected behaviour on above steps: 5* A runs A 6) Super+A runs S (current behaviour) 7) Ctrl+A runs Select All (current behaviour) 8) Ctrl+Super+A runs C, provided the two modifiers are pressed before A (current behaviour) NB this bug does not appear related to priority issues between keys and mods as discussed in other reports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303404 Title: Hotkeys with modifier overriding each other To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxfce4ui/+bug/1303404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098944]
Raphael, Great, that seems to narrow the bug down to librsvg 2.36, since the devs haven't pointed out any relevant commit from Ristretto 0.6.3-1 to 0.6.3-4. Marking as resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098944 Title: Ristretto crashes when opening SVG files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ristretto/+bug/1098944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098944]
I cannot reproduce the bug with librsvg 2.40.2. Raphael, are you sure your Ristretto is crashing as a result of the attached SVG and not another one? Your strace indicates another SVG file is opened first, can you try to open this svg in a separate folder? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098944 Title: Ristretto crashes when opening SVG files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ristretto/+bug/1098944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1327791]
(apologies for the length)
Xfce products concerned:
- Thunar
- Xfdesktop
- xfce4-appfinder
- xfce4-session?
Files concerned (from now on called App files):
- Binaries with the exec bit
- Scripts with the exec bit
- Desktop files
- (future) Docker container files?
Relevant use cases:
- A: Users running apps directly by clicking on them from an "Apps" folder or
the desktop (esp. Windows and OS X users)
- B: Developers/sysadmins who need to regularly edit .desktop files or scripts
- C: Users being tricked into downloading and executing code, without knowing
what they're opening is code
- D: Users being instructed to download and run code (esp. scripts) which they
believe is trustworthy and which they're usually not capable of analysing
Threat Model (informal):
The most common scenarii for attacks are drive-by downloads and existing
malware adding binaries. Downloads can either be source files that target the
app that opens them (very common) or App files (common too). Malware can be
truly malicious software or benign software that has been compromised
(including Xfce apps). It may want to create replacements for common programs
and edit PATH, or add autostart apps. Without sandboxing virtually nothing can
be done about it so it's offtopic for now. Note malware can set the exec bit
itself.
Another scenario would be people posing as community helpers and posting
(malicious) scripts. These scripts are quite common on the Linux world
and everybody trusts each other. This is not a problem we can really
address only technically...
Ideal solutions to untrusted downloads:
We can identify whether the source of a file is trusted by the user to provide
services without hindering her security and privacy. We can then treat
untrusted Apps either by means of warning or plugging on top of existing
sandboxing software, along with appropriate notifications of the security
status of the system and appropriate controls. So far this is highly
speculative and requires development means and a design plan far beyond simply
Xfce.
Ideal solutions to malware:
Apps should not be able to install other local apps without being given a
special permission. Then Xfce can differentiate between how it treats App files
for locally installed apps and App files that were created in other areas of
the filesystem where existing apps can write.
Default behaviour expected by users:
The use cases call for a different interpretation of the cheapest interaction
that can be performed on files. Obvious take away: we will need a settings UI
to choose the default behaviour. Given that the potential user base has many
more A users than B, and given no figures are available on the current Xfce
userbase, I recommend that by default clicking on an App file is aligned on A
and C. B is more of an edge case with users more competent to modify the
default and D is a more problematic behaviour we shouldn't promote.
Default behaviour we should implement:
We can treat all App files of installed applications by executing them
directly. We can define installed applications as those which have a .desktop
file or a binary in @PREFIX@/share/applications/ and @PREFIX@/bin. Valid XDG
prefixes are /usr, /usr/local and ~/.local/ on most *NIX OSes. Might want to
include the "opt" ones as well though I'm skeptical. Some of these locations
are writable by malware so for now I would recommend a Xfconf setting or a
settings UI to disable default-execution for locally installed software.
Standalone binaries/scripts/desktop files should be given a security
warning. We need to tell users that they are about to let someone run
code on their platform and damage could ensue. This protects the C
group, educates the D group (if they read...) but of course pisses off
the A and B group. Hence we also need to tell them how to intelligently
get rid of this annoying warning! Again a setting should be provided to
let B developers and advanced A users override the warning if it gets in
the way of their workflow as they generally understand what code
execution means.
Warning goals:
- Warn about unwanted executions WITHOUT WASTING THE USER'S TIME
- Give users an economic incentive to install apps properly
- Cover major use cases and PROVIDE ONLY ACTIONABLE ACTIONS
Warning actions:
- Let users run untrusted code if they feel like it
- Provide a nice quick UX to untrusted executions in sandboxes (i.e. the
warning gives a "Run in sandbox" button when sandboxes become available)
- Help users install their apps by providing a button/link that either
redirects to a helper (better) or automagically "installs" the app
- Help users get back to safety and move on ("Cancel" or "Keep me safe"
button...)
What about locally installed apps?
We should have a logic to differentiate between Apps that are installed and
Apps that aren't. Installed Apps should always have a desktop files in
@PREFIX@/share/applications/. Note that locally installed apps should be on the
[Bug 1347272] Re: Several XFCE applications appear irresponsible after communicating with a daemon
Thanks for the triaging effort! As far as I know xfce4-volumed-pulse has a fix committed already though I'll let mrpouit confirm. The ALSA xfce4-volumed never had the issue. ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347272 Title: Several XFCE applications appear irresponsible after communicating with a daemon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdk-pixbuf/+bug/1347272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1347272] Re: DBus communication problems affecting multiple packages
If this turns out to have anything to do with Bug #1314782, then the issue lies not in D-Bus but in Ubuntu patches to GTK+ conflicting with Xubuntu patches to XFCE apps (or possibly with the apps originally). I don't remember the exact details but whoever triages/investigates this should get in touch with the Xubuntu team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347272 Title: DBus communication problems affecting multiple packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1347272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314782] Re: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode
** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314782 Title: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1314782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314782] Re: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode
I very highly doubt that anything being slow has to do with this bug. This one should break things entirely rather than slow them down. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314782 Title: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1314782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Thanks for helping me Julian! 2014-05-29 15:04 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > Great, thanks! I'm glad that the source of the memory leak has at last > been identified, even if it will take a while to solve. > > :-) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Well, I know nothing about keymaps implementations but somehow libkeybinder believes your keymap still changes regularly! In any case, I don't know how I could fix their own bug, so I'll rewrite xvd with something else... when I can... 2014-05-28 14:11 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > Sorry for slow reply. Anyway, I've disabled all but one keymap (gb > altgr-intl), and ran xfce4-volumed again (after logging out and logging > in again). I then removed the USB keyboard and did the same. There is > still significant memory loss - logs attached. > > :-( > > ** Attachment added: "xfce4-one-keyboard.tar.gz" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4121448/+files/xfce4-one-keyboard.tar.gz > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408903] Re: Does not handle microphone mute button (KEY_MICMUTE)
Regarding xfce4-volumed please submit any patch upstream (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1323030). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408903 Title: Does not handle microphone mute button (KEY_MICMUTE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/408903/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
This is indeed quite surprising! If you disable your keymaps and just use one of them, does it still significantly leak / does xfsettingsd still leak, too? The trace clearly indicates that the leak occurs precisely when the keymap is changed -- libkeybinder probably forgets to clean up the data it had about the previous keymap! 2014-05-14 17:47 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > I have a USB keyboard plugged into the MacBook, and I have three keymaps > set up. I don't tend to intentionally change them during the course of > the day, but I do occasionally do so inadvertently. If you want to know > the details of the USB keyboard, comment #30 above includes the output > of hwinfo. It sounds like you think this might well be the trigger for > the bug. > > A good catch! > >Julian > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Hi Julian, Do you use multiple keymaps (e.g. switching keyboard layouts) throughout the day? Do you have a particular kind of keyboard, or plug a USB keyboard to your MacBook? Thanks! 2014-05-14 14:38 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > OK, here's the valgrind output - vanilla xfce4-volumed with keybinder > debugging on. I see what you mean about the huge space leaks! > > Julian > > ** Attachment added: "xfce4-keybinder-tracing-REPORT.txt" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4112359/+files/xfce4-keybinder-tracing-REPORT.txt > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Shouldn't be... I need an alternative for keybinder too... It's gonna be so fun to rewrite this daemon! :D 2014-05-12 23:42 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > Annoyingly, the Debian keybinder package doesn't offer a -dbg version, > so I'll have to compile one. I doubt I'll have time tomorrow, but I'll > have a go on Wednesday, all being well. I'll see if I can figure out > how to do so (it shouldn't be too hard, right?! famous last words...). > And you're right - the original keybinder does seem to be unmaintained - > the original site now says 404. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Also I'm not sure if you're a developer yourself or not, so if anything is unclear or cryptic please do tell me and I'll explain better :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
The culprit is keybinder. I'm fairly convinced it's unmaintained, but I could maybe fix it myself. I would need you to find out how to install a debug version of it and re-run valgrind on any xfce4-volumed (-pulse or vanilla). Then I can see which function it is that causes these huge leaks. For instance on the trace below, there are three functions leading to XkbGetMap and malloc, but in my key event handler I don't have any freeable objects so it must be one of those three functions (marked ??? because you have the normal library rather than the debug library) that forgets to free something... and somehow only on certain platforms: ==26234== 164,683,872 bytes in 2,287,276 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,817 of 3,817 ==26234==at 0x4C29590: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:618) ==26234==by 0xA6499C0: XkbGetMap (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6.3.0) ==26234==by 0x6B0172E: ??? (in /usr/lib/libkeybinder.so.0.1.0) ==26234==by 0x6B017FD: ??? (in /usr/lib/libkeybinder.so.0.1.0) ==26234==by 0x6B0190F: ??? (in /usr/lib/libkeybinder.so.0.1.0) ==26234==by 0x57CA5E6: _g_closure_invoke_va (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4000.0) ==26234==by 0x57E3087: g_signal_emit_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4000.0) ==26234==by 0x57E4211: g_signal_emit_by_name (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4000.0) ==26234==by 0x7397C9F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.23) ==26234==by 0x7398125: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.23) ==26234==by 0x73981CD: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.23) ==26234==by 0x4E7AE03: g_main_context_dispatch (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4000.0) Let me know if you need instructions, and I'll look it up (am not on Ubuntu though). ** Also affects: keybinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
This patch removes all xfconf branches -- volume notifications should work but only the mute key should be properly handled. Let me know if it still leaks a lot. Apply separately from the previous and next patches. ** Patch added: "0001-No-more-xfconf.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4109755/+files/0001-No-more-xfconf.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
This patch removes all mixer branches -- obviously it'll strip down your xvd to a piece of useless junk! Let me know if it still leaks a lot. Apply separately from the previous and next patches. ** Patch added: "0001-Getting-rid-of-all-mixer-code-branches.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4109754/+files/0001-Getting-rid-of-all-mixer-code-branches.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
This patch removes keybinder code -- only volume change notifications will work. Let me know if it still leaks a lot. Apply separately from the previous and next patches. Note that there's a possibility simply including the libraries causes leakages (because libraries sometimes do dirty stuff...), so if you're still leaking with either of the patches then I'll make more aggressive ones that remove libraries entirely. ** Patch added: "0001-Removing-keybinder.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4109756/+files/0001-Removing-keybinder.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
So it does leak just as much for you! If you're ok with it I'll write a couple of other patches disabling notifications, keybinding, volume control... I'm very surprised that it's not just libasound leaking! Thanks again for all this help. 2014-05-09 13:57 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > I've applied the patch; here's the new output of valgrind. > > Thanks! > > ** Attachment added: "xfce4-patched-REPORT.txt" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4108685/+files/xfce4-patched-REPORT.txt > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Turns out I had forgotten some leaks. You can try this patch if you want, though you shouldn't have many hopes! It seems XkbGetMap is the culprit for you and I've no idea what even causes this to be called. ** Patch added: "0001-Memleak-fixing.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4108292/+files/0001-Memleak-fixing.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
I had a chat with the GStreamer people, and GstMixer will not be replaced in future releases in GStreamer. They also no longer take fixes for GStreamer 0.10. That means that anyway I'll rewrite the daemon to use libpulse and libasound directly. Julian, after this chat I also think that the memory leak you have is related to libasound and libpulse. Running valgrind again, my code seems to leak only stuff from init functions, that get called once (it's because they're not released when I interrupt the daemon, actually). Can *all* users with a memory leak please do the following: - Download and extract the source - Go to the source directory and type: ./configure --enable-debug - Then type: make - Then run: valgrind --leak-check=full ./src/xfce4-volumed >REPORT 2>&1 - Enjoy your computer for about 30 minutes - After a while, go back to the terminal, hit Ctrl+C to stop valgrind - Send me the report so I can count the libasound and libpulse related leaks and report to those people - Also remember to tell me precisely what your computer is -- if you know, tell what audio hardware you have I'm sorry but it'll take a bit of time for me to push a patch. I have a few high-priority pieces of code to release now before I can hack again on xvd... ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Importance: Low => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Sure Julian, the more data you can provide me the likelier I will spot what's going on (well, hopefully :-) ). 2014-05-06 13:01 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > (Oh, and if anyone else is looking for the xfce4-volumed-pulse package, > the PPA is at https://launchpad.net/~mrpouit/+archive/ppa) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Very interesting! Julian, may I also ask you to attach the output of #cat /proc//maps and #cat /proc//maps ? It will tell the whole list of libraries that are opened by each app. 2014-05-06 10:56 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the explanation. > > I've just come back in, opened my computer and waited and waited and > waited for it to respond ;-) > With xfce4-volumed-pulse, things are as bad as before: with top sorted by > %MEM: > > top - 10:36:36 up 8 days, 34 min, 5 users, load average: 16.32, 19.37, > 15.93 > Tasks: 249 total, 1 running, 248 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 5.7 us, 1.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 24.5 id, 68.4 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem: 3964008 total, 3874228 used,89780 free, 3040 buffers > KiB Swap: 9760764 total, 8485812 used, 1274952 free. 150392 cached Mem > > PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 10701 jdg 20 0 8702408 1.234g 1164 D 0.0 32.7 73:15.19 > xfce4-volu+ > 10608 jdg 20 0 2560556 1.144g 12604 S 0.3 30.3 32:22.79 > xfsettingsd > 11137 jdg 20 0 1454064 345380 9332 D 0.3 8.7 21:02.01 > iceweasel > > > Then ps aux shows: > > USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > jdg 10701 1.0 32.3 8701956 1281372 ? Dsl May01 73:13 > xfce4-volumed-pulse > jdg 24918 0.0 0.0 377880 792 ?S /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog > > But top sorted by %CPU shows very little of interest: > > top - 10:36:48 up 8 days, 34 min, 5 users, load average: 14.91, 18.91, > 15.83 > Tasks: 248 total, 1 running, 247 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 2.9 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 41.5 id, 54.6 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem: 3964008 total, 3836104 used, 127904 free, 1748 buffers > KiB Swap: 9760764 total, 8489832 used, 1270932 free. 139944 cached Mem > > PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 30731 root 20 0 76676 1880840 S 6.6 0.0 399:25.52 > cups-brows+ > 10401 root 20 0 278536 19896 5396 S 3.7 0.5 372:56.88 Xorg > 18022 root 20 0 85228 3072904 S 3.0 0.1 91:17.50 cupsd > 11059 jdg 20 0 582780 9336 4248 S 1.3 0.2 0:59.45 > xfce4-term+ > 10608 jdg 20 0 2560556 1.142g 12604 D 0.7 30.2 32:22.83 > xfsettingsd >39 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 0.3 0.0 12:04.63 kswapd0 > 5204 postgres 20 0 221736 1168804 S 0.3 0.0 4:08.56 > postgres > 5703 root 20 04208128108 S 0.3 0.0 0:00.29 > minissdpd > 10607 jdg 20 0 535372 8720 4216 S 0.3 0.2 0:38.58 > xfce4-panel > 10655 jdg 20 0 181124 3416 2416 S 0.3 0.1 10:50.06 > panel-15-c+ > > Interestingly, xfsettingsd was also gobbling memory; I don't know > whether that's part of the same bug, with one causing the other, or > whether it's an unrelated bug. > > Next step: back to xfce4-volumed and remove pulseaudio. > >Julian > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Hi Julian, Sorry I wasn't really clear! xfce4-volumed (vanilla) only knows GStreamer, so it tries to find an audio card and then interacts with it. What PulseAudio does (as far as I know) to make old apps like xfce4-volumed work is that it emulates an Alsa card, which xfce4-volumed picks up if configured properly (in short if you install PulseAudio after using Alsa you may need to manually change the xfconf keys of xfce4-volumed to start using the Pulse "card"). The reason I wanted multiple tests done is because I don't know where the leak is. I've looked at my code a lot and it should only leak a little bit when it's disconnecting. So the leak might be in the GStreamer mixer interface with some configurations, the keybinder library with some configurations (not so likely), etc. I can't trigger leaks on my system, but trying Pulse or Alsa as a backend might give clues on what code branches or what parameters cause some function to leak. Trying the -pulse version will also inform whether it's some of the code only present in vanilla that leaks (in which case it's more likely to be my fault :) ). To try using Alsa instead of Pulse, the most direct way is to remove Pulse from your system and kill the pulseaudio daemon (make sure to save whatever custom configuration you have). To try -pulse, you'd need to get the package from Ubuntu, I don't remember the name of the PPA/repository where it is though. Your help is very appreciated, and obviously take your time, this bug has been here for 5 years anyway, so there's no hurry ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Julian, thanks for the report! Could I please ask you to check if this happen when: - using Alsa as a backend and vanilla xfce4-volumed - using PA as a backend and vanilla xfce4-volumed - using PA as a backend and xfce4-volumed-pulse Understanding when the leak occurs will help us to identify which code section is causing the leak, and then we know who to talk to to find the cause. 2014-05-01 13:41 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > Thanks for the pointers! I've got pulseaudio running, and the sound card > (it's a MacBook Pro running Debian) is: > 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset > Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04) > Debian doesn't currently have xfce4-volumed-pulse; I'll try the Ubuntu > package. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314782] Re: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode
Kudos on the fixing Alistair! Lionel, may I please ask you to notify me in a way or another when you modify something in your fork, so that: - if there was a reason I did it differently, I can let you know about it and we can discuss what approach fits best - if my code was bad, I can improve it and deliver to the few people out there still stuck on ALSA Thanks! ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314782 Title: multimedia keys don't work when xfce4-volumed is run in daemon mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1314782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
First of all, type 'ps aux | grep pulseaudio' to verify whether you use Pulseaudio or GStreamer. If you use Pulseaudio and used GStreamer before, it's probably good to clear your config, remove xfce4-volumed and install xfce4-volumed-pulse instead (courtesy of Lionel Le Folgoc). Be careful that xvd picks up the first sound card it finds when it runs, so if xvd ends up controlling the sound of your TV, kettle, cat, or something else than your "primary" speakers, then you'll have to go into the xfconf settings of xvd (using xfce4-settings-editor for instance) and modify the settings to use another card. Which brings us to checking your audio cards: http://www.linuxnix.com/2013/06/find-sound-card-details-in-linuxunix.htmlwill give you some commands to identify your sound card, then you can try to google it and see if it's one of those cards that are known to be misfunctioning on default installs of GStreamer on your distro (happened a lot back in the day when I wrote xvd). Generally speaking if you're using GStreamer then it's a good idea to find out what card you have, and go through GStreamer's bugzilla in search for information on potential memory leaks or issues. As a gentle reminder, xfce4-volumed is no longer supported. It might be time to switch to Pulseaudio and use xfce4-volumed-pulse instead :) 2014-04-30 10:47 GMT+01:00 Julian Gilbey : > How do I determine which backend is being used? I am also suffering > from the same problem. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 > > Title: > xfce4-volumed using too much RAM > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions > -- Steve Dodier-Lazaro PhD Student in Information Security University College London Free Software Developer OpenPGP : 1B6B1670 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1270894] Re: Sorting by date or name not working properly in thumbnail bar
I've written some code that exposes a reordered signal to Ristretto when the list is reordered. I've fixed some segfault-causing issue in the reordering handler. I still have some issues: the reordering goes wild! In particular: - the order when the app is launched is exactly the contrary to the order when - it seems to me the order goes wild at some point... I'm suspecting the way I write the ordering in the image list! ** Patch added: "Partial patch (not enough to fix bug)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ristretto/+bug/1270894/+attachment/4077614/+files/steve.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270894 Title: Sorting by date or name not working properly in thumbnail bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ristretto/+bug/1270894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1270894] Re: Sorting by date or name not working properly in thumbnail bar
This bug is rather hard to fix. It seems that when the image list is re- sorted, it seems it forgets to inform the tree model that actually draws the icons. I've tried to fix it but it seems I got the size of the tree model wrong, and I also suspect some bugs in the reordering handler of the custom tree model. Pasi, is the original dev still around by any chance? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270894 Title: Sorting by date or name not working properly in thumbnail bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ristretto/+bug/1270894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
As I've written a few years back, the code in xfce4-volumed itself does not leak (much). I'm pretty convinced that leaks occur within gstreamer for certain types of configurations / cards, rather than within xvd itself (though I will correct my code if proven wrong :) ). People posting 'ps aux' commands will not help me to figure out what triggers the leaks, since that does not tell me what card they have, and how their gstreamer is configured. Please also note that xvd is no longer officially supported, and some distros ship a modified version with a PulseAudio backend. I'd need at the very least to know which backend is being used and what hardware/software is being used, so I can forward bugs to gstreamer if appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 Title: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1254884] Re: xfce4-volumed mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master
Thanks for your check Horst. I've re-directed the bug at the Pulseaudio Ubuntu packagers so they can have a look at it. ** Also affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - xfce4-volumed mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master + On some Xubuntu systems, having pulseaudio installed causes incoherent muting of GStreamer channels (it mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254884 Title: On some Xubuntu systems, having pulseaudio installed causes incoherent muting of GStreamer channels (it mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1254884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1254884] Re: xfce4-volumed mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master
This is a bug occurring between GStreamer and Pulse. The bug triagers would need one of the OPs to uninstall Pulse and check if it still happens, at the very least, to know if it's a sound card config issue / bug in GStreamer or if it's an issue with Pulse. ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254884 Title: xfce4-volumed mutes master, headphone and speaker but unmutes only master To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/1254884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1184643] Re: Upgrade to 13.04 installs pulseaudio
I've no idea why on earth such a "recommends" exists in the Ubuntu package of xvd, since xvd is not supporting Pulseaudio and was never designed to support it. It should only ask that the GStreamer mixer plugin (and possibly xfce4-mixer) are installed, as far as I remember. Obviously xvd is not maintained since years now, so it might be that the Xubuntu developers found out how to configure it to make it work with Pulseaudio. It was just not working back when it was written and so, xvd should never "require" so to speak Pulseaudio. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184643 Title: Upgrade to 13.04 installs pulseaudio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1184643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058037] Re: Activity Log Manager crashes with GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_application_list_actions: assertion `application->priv->is_registered' failed
I tested the patch and it did fix the segfault and warning for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058037 Title: Activity Log Manager crashes with GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_application_list_actions: assertion `application->priv->is_registered' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/activity-log-manager/+bug/1058037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885956] Re: unmute doesn't work anymore
Do you have any bug with xfce4-volumed when gnome-settings-daemon and pulseaudio are NOT installed and NOT running? These applications are not compatible with each other, and I'm not willing to make xfce4-volume work with anything else than GStreamer at the moment (if you want such a feature, please start a discussion on the xfce4 development mailing list: http://www.xfce.org/community). Thanks in advance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885956 Title: unmute doesn't work anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/885956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886447] Re: mute/unmute button doesn't unmute
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 885956 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885956 Do you have any bug with xfce4-volumed when gnome-settings-daemon and pulseaudio are NOT installed and NOT running? These applications are not compatible with each other, and I'm not willing to make xfce4-volume work with anything else than GStreamer at the moment (if you want such a feature, please start a discussion on the xfce4 development mailing list: http://www.xfce.org/community). Thanks in advance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886447 Title: mute/unmute button doesn't unmute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/886447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778919] Re: package vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778919 Title: package vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778919] [NEW] package vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vim Hello, There seems to be a conflict between vim-common and llvm-dev on file /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri May 6 23:54:21 2011 ErrorMessage: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: vim Title: package vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-04 (2 days ago) ** Affects: vim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778919 Title: package vim-common 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent », qui appartient aussi au paquet llvm-dev 2.8-0ubuntu3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725986] Re: Change the description
Hello, I redirected the report to the package maintainer. ** Also affects: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725986 Title: Change the description -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630221] Re: Tray 'Play/Pause' item doesn't reflect current state
Aren, if you could please review and apply the patch. ** Changed in: exaile Assignee: (unassigned) => Aren Olson (reacocard) -- Tray 'Play/Pause' item doesn't reflect current state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630221] Re: Tray 'Play/Pause' item doesn't reflect current state
** Changed in: exaile Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: exaile Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: exaile Milestone: None => 0.3.2.1 -- Tray 'Play/Pause' item doesn't reflect current state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622041] Re: pressing the volume up don and mute button freezes all keybaord and mouse input
Alright, thank you for your confirmation. The report was wrongly assigned to xfce4-volumed, I suspect instead a problem with the Xorg input drivers / the kernel, that would trigger the key event more than necessary when a volume key is pressed. ** Package changed: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) => xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- pressing the volume up don and mute button freezes all keybaord and mouse input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622041] Re: pressing the volume up don and mute button freezes all keybaord and mouse input
Is this under Ubuntu or Xubuntu? ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- pressing the volume up don and mute button freezes all keybaord and mouse input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624754] Re: [USB-Audio - Sound Blaster Extigy] pactl stat failed to find default card
Is this under Ubuntu or Xubuntu? ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- [USB-Audio - Sound Blaster Extigy] pactl stat failed to find default card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407917] Re: xfce volume manager crashed after login
I must say I completely forgot this bug... I currently have a patch that changes the whole key-binding library in xfce4-volumed, so once the next version is released, it may fix this bug. Alas, I'm currently not able to push it to the Git repository, so I can't release it yet. -- xfce volume manager crashed after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428945] Re: xfce4-volumed segfaulted
This is likely a memory corruption. Some of the code related to card name cleaning has been refactored, so I would be interested in the reporter to test xfce4-volumed 0.1.8 and to let me know if a bug still occurs. Thanks in advance. -- xfce4-volumed segfaulted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447209] Re: xfce4-volumed crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
I feel like a comment is needed from me, since I'm the person who was meant to fix this bug a long time ago. Here is why it has not and will probably never be fixed: The bug is triggered on a limited set of hardware configurations, of which I own none. On the computer on which xvd was developed, it never crashed. On my alternative laptop, it crashed 4 times in six months, and I suspect this was due to another problem related to my not-so-stable Pulseaudio + Wine + crappy BIOS/Kernel setup. The exact problem, as far as I can diagnose it, is a crash on track volume querying. I do not know any more. I can not use a debugger to find where it crashes since I can't reproduce the bug. I almost know nothing of GStreamer, so I am not able to quote reasons that would lead to a crash when a client application queries volume for an apparently valid track. I believe I assigned one of the duplicate reports to the GStreamer team, but got no answer. #8, Frank, all these reports are automated reports of the same bug happening on different setups. Considering the number of reports, it affects a lot of people, yet a much bigger lot of people uses xvd without any problem. Do not think the problem is being disregarded, I just can not help it (see above as for why). It is rather pretentious of you to write "stop saying you'll fix it, and fix it". I spent hours looking for solutions to this problem, and if I could not find one, it's certainly not my fault. #9, Teej, I should have assigned myself to the upstream project instead of the Ubuntu package, I'll grant you that. This is now done. Anyone able to diagnose the bug better than me and to step in for fixing it is free to assign oneself instead of me. #12, Lionel, that would have caused a SIGFPE and not a SIGSEGV. The problem is below, unfortunately. However, you're right about the lack of sturdiness of the code (eventhough I know no configuration where the volume range could be 0). Opening a new report about that. Thanks. #16, Frank, thanks for the hardware configuration. Would you be kind enough to check (with the lshw command) what model of sound card do you exactly own? Also, kernel versions (uname -a) and gstreamer versions (apt-cache policy libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0) might help any passer-by developer who knows about GStreamer. #19, Frank, the other problem seems completely unrelated. Please open a new report against Xubuntu with the *exact* error messages you get. Final comment: I need exact hardware/kernel/gstreamer configurations. There is no way for me to fix the bug, but anybody with the same configuration and who knows about debugging/development may be able to have a look. If you can reproduce the bug, a GDB trace of where it crashes (with the GStreamer debugging symbols installed, a nice function stack, and possibly some prints of the function parameters / local variables in where it crashes and the 1 or 2 functions above, plus the last function located in xvd) is more than welcome. ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Dodier (sidi) -- xfce4-volumed crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447209] Re: xfce4-volumed crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
** Also affects: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xfce4-volumed crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM
Please do not get confused between virtual memory and write memory. On your system, xfce4-volumed appears to be using 600kiB of RAM, and then 6MiB. This still indicates a memory leak, however, but I'm not sure the code I wrote is responsible for it (since it was audited for memory leaks and none were found except for some oneshot code run at initialization). I have some code to commit for xfce4-volumed that might remove some of the memory leaks (and might add some) since it will change the library used for key bindings. I'm not going to investigate the memory leaks till then. ** Also affects: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Dodier (sidi) -- xfce4-volumed using too much RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546201] Re: [LUCID Beta 1] Brightness Fn keys don't work as expected on Sony Vaio VGN FW35G. Regression.
Exactly the same problem happens in Lucid, with HP 6730b (Intel GMA950), with 2.6.31-20 and 2.6.32-19. -- [LUCID Beta 1] Brightness Fn keys don't work as expected on Sony Vaio VGN FW35G. Regression. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428945] Re: can't start xcfe interface, started with flash card (unetbootin)
** Also affects: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: xfce4-volumed Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Dodier (sidi) ** Summary changed: - can't start xcfe interface, started with flash card (unetbootin) + xfce4-volumed segfaulted -- xfce4-volumed segfaulted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361678] Re: screensaver-lock dialog looks
I'm assigning the bug report to the concerned theme, Albatross. We partly fixed it by writing a .Xdefaults file (that I still have to upload to our repository), but there is a limitation to what we can do: the lock dialog's logo can not be removed or changed, unfortunately. ** Also affects: albatross Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: albatross Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: albatross Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: albatross Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Dodier (sidi) -- screensaver-lock dialog looks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528567] Re: Ubuntu One Music Store plugin
While I don't wish to work on this on my own (because it takes time and I'm not interesting in working on something contributing to selling music), I can provide you with some help with Exaile's inner workings if needed, despite my limited knowledge of it and Python. You can ask for help in #exaile at any time anyway, if it's about development. ** Changed in: exaile Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- Ubuntu One Music Store plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417778] Re: xfce4-volumed takes 100% cpu when system is idle for some time
The problem is linked to a GStreamer function doing nonsense when some devices are added or removed, so I'm adding GStreamer to the report, hopefully people who know it better than I can bring input about what's going on. ** Also affects: gstreamer Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xfce4-volumed takes 100% cpu when system is idle for some time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
