[Bug 585379] Re: chrunchbang did not install

2010-05-25 Thread Reimer Stever
OK. found where and how.

but no idea about failed instalation..

Live system worked.
thank you for hints.

Reimer

-- 
chrunchbang did not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 585379] Re: chrunchbang did not install

2010-05-25 Thread Reimer Stever

** Attachment added: "syslog"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49075510/syslog

-- 
chrunchbang did not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 585379] Re: chrunchbang did not install

2010-05-25 Thread Reimer Stever

** Attachment added: "partman"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49075478/partman

-- 
chrunchbang did not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 585379] [NEW] chrunchbang did not install

2010-05-25 Thread Reimer Stever
Public bug reported:

how can i attach both :/var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman ?

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
chrunchbang did not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 32906] Re: sudo shouldn’t ABSOLUTELY NEED to look up the host it’s running on

2008-04-28 Thread SteveR
Having just installed ubuntu 08.04 on a new server, then putting it in a
datacenter over an hour away, then copying our master hosts file over
and thus loosing the server, I can say that this bug is reason enough
for us to drop the whole idea of moving to ubuntu. I think it needs a
couple of more years. Obviously not many people use it, or this would
not have ever passed through to a release version. The use case for a
sys admin setting up network settings is that not all settings are set
simultaneously. With no real root account (I was going to set it up
soon), a remote server is now completely hosed. This is entirely too
fragile to rely upon.

-- 
sudo shouldn’t ABSOLUTELY NEED to look up the host it’s running on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32906
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs