[Bug 377376] Re: Update Robocode to current version

2010-12-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551877
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551877

** Also affects: robocode (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551877
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377376

Title:
  Update Robocode to current version

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-17 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
It works in 2.2.2. Marking as fix released since 2.2.2 is in Lucid's
archives.

** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
[Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 504101] Re: wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 503510 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 503510
   [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option

-- 
wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504101] [NEW] wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: amarok

Amarok tries to stream from wrong Magnatune URL when subscribed and
using nynorsk locate.

Workaround: Use English locate

** Affects: amarok
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #212126
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212126

** Also affects: amarok via
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212126
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: amarok
  
  When trying to add my download subscription from magnatunes.com to
  Amarok it jumps back to stream.
+ 
+ Workaround: change language to English

-- 
[Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed:

- Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
+ [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option

-- 
[Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 503510] Re: Magnatune settings doesn’ t remember download option

2010-01-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Patch here:
http://gitorious.org/amarok/amarok/commit/9070de03771104f4bac79f6673a877b1ae472778

Could it be backported to the version in Karmic?

-- 
Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503510] [NEW] Magnatune settings doesn ’t remember download option

2010-01-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: amarok

When trying to add my download subscription from magnatunes.com to
Amarok it jumps back to stream.

** Affects: amarok
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #195427
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195427

** Also affects: amarok via
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195427
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 487851] [NEW] [feature request] booting El Torito CDs from GRUB

2009-11-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: grub2

It would be nice if Grub2 could load bootable cdroms from it's menu.
(Use case: my BIOS is broken and refuse me to boot from CD) I don't know
if the support from the Summer of code project 2007 still can be used
with newer versions of GRUB 2.

** Affects: grub
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #9841
   http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?9841

** Also affects: grub via
   http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?9841
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
[feature request] booting El Torito CDs from GRUB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487851
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-21 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Added bug to xorg-server since it's fixed there upstreams:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=19f7c15e2008dab3c46ba3e14dfa353d01c74f72
According to a comment in the upstream bugreport it requires a newer
version of xorg-server to work.

The work around patch to xf86-video-intel in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482 fixes the issue in
the version of xf86-video-intel in Karmic (at least for me). Don't know
if it should be applied to the Ubuntu version of xf86-video-intel or
not.

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-21 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Mandriva Linux #54712
   http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54712

** Also affects: mandriva via
   http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54712
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #24482
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482

** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 463004] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()

2009-10-28 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571828/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571829/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571830/ArecordDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571831/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571832/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571833/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571834/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571835/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571836/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571837/IwConfig.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571838/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571839/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "OopsText.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571840/OopsText.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571841/PciMultimedia.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571842/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571843/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571844/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571845/RfKill.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571846/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571847/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571848/WifiSyslog.txt

** Attachment added: "WpaSupplicantLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571849/WpaSupplicantLog.txt

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 
suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 463004] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()

2009-10-28 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

After waking up from suspend to RAM apport asks me to report this bug. I
don't notice that anything else is wrong

ProblemType: KernelOops
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be 
restarted.
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  sveinung   2455 F pulseaudio
  sveinung   2459 F kmix
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd454 irq 21'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC861-VD'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0862,173410c1,0011 
HDA:10573055,10573055,00100700'
   Controls  : 19
   Simple ctrls  : 13
Date: Thu Oct 29 00:55:46 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Failure: oops
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=2262e1bf-390c-4863-a088-5d7e63255575
MachineType: FUJITSU SIEMENS AMILO Pro Edition V3505
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.48
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic 
root=UUID=fe32a529-8849-41ba-b50b-add3bc501087 ro quiet splash nomodesetting
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.31-14-generic N/A
 linux-firmware 1.24
SourcePackage: linux
Tags: kernel-oops
Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 
suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64
dmi.bios.date: 01/08/2007
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD
dmi.bios.version: R01-B0E
dmi.board.name: AMILO Pro Edition V3505
dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS
dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: F50988E0B5EB11DB9A61C474995D0A43
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS
dmi.chassis.version: A2040
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvrR01-B0E:bd01/08/2007:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:pnAMILOProEditionV3505:pvr20:rvnFUJITSUSIEMENS:rnAMILOProEditionV3505:rvrNotApplicable:cvnFUJITSUSIEMENS:ct10:cvrA2040:
dmi.product.name: AMILO Pro Edition V3505
dmi.product.version: 20
dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops kernel-oops

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 
suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Another reason to think the problem is in KMS is that this only happens
when KMS is used. With KMS disabled (when nomodeset is passed as an
argument to linux from the boot loader) the fonts are normal.

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
To me it seems (from the sequence above) like it reads from EDID,
understand that it's wrong when calculating the dpi but somehow forgets
it when KMS is started. Could someone more experienced with this than my
hours of googeling if I'm on the right track?

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34449141/Xorg.0.log

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
What I find interesting here is this sequenze from /var/log/Xorg.0.log:

(II) intel(0): clock: 71.2 MHz   Image Size:  289 x 21 mm
(...)
(==) intel(0): DPI set to (96, 96)
(...)
(**) intel(0): Kernel mode setting active, disabling FBC.
(...)
(II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 289 x 21

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461863] [NEW] Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel

Yesterday I upgraded to Karmic. Karmic uses KMS. When I rebooted kdm had
huge fonts. KDE also had huge fonts, and Firefox had huge fonts and so
huge graphics that only the three first buttons on the navigation tool
bar was visible.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Thank you very much for your help uploading and for your feedback.

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 398535]

2009-08-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Look here for the missing changelog entry: 
> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/all-in-one-sidebar
Seems like 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 disappeared when 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 got uploaded
since it weren't pushed to the bazaar branch and 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 was
based on the version in the bazaar branch (0.7.4-0ubuntu1).

> Anyway you should include every change that the package had before your new 
> package, so you will have to add the missing changelog entry plus its changes.
Sure. In order to preserve history I put 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 on top of
0.7.4-0ubuntu1 (in the branch) and merged it into the newest version.
That way the history will make sense for the changes from
0.7.4-0ubuntu2 that suddenly appears in the newer version. I kept the
change log entry and watch file from 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 since it was
better then the one currently in all-in-one-sidebar. The rest had
already been done.

> For the other lintian warning, just go to debian/control and bump 
> Standards-version to 3.8.2 and you're done. It will take like 1 minute.
So the package follow policy? The CDBS magic takes care of it? Cool. Done.

Thank you very much for your help!
Sveinung

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 398535]

2009-08-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> 1) you forgot adding some changelog's entry
Not sure if I understand what you meant here. Please explain. If you
mean from bazaar: I don't think "open tree for development" belong in
the debian changelog when it's closed again. (See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Packaging where it
instructs me to remove it from the Debain changelog in the end) Or
should "new upstream release (LP: #398535)" be "RELEASE
all-in-one-sidebar v0.7.10 to ubuntu karmic (LP: #398535)"?

> 2) there are two minor lintian warnings
Fixed one. I don't have time right now to check it for Debian policy
3.8.2 right now so it would be nice if it could be uploaded anyway
like you offered.

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> I know this is a new upstream release, that's why I asked you to put it
> on REVU for a better review.
Good to know. I was confused after reading "If you packaged a new
upstream version (of a package that is already in the archives), and
you want to get it sponsored, do not use REVU to get it sponsored" in
the wiki when my upload didn't work.

> So please try again, maybe you didnt push
> it properly.
Seems like it was uploaded but not accepted. When I signed it again
using my old (expired) gpg-key instead of the new one (that I uploaded
to Launchpad today) it was accepted. It can now be found at
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/all-in-one-sidebar

> Why do you want to merge it into ubuntu-dev? by doing it
> you won't be able to push stuff into that branch anymore. What do you
> think?
Sorry if I didn't express myself clear. I was wondering if you could
do the merge if/when you upload the package to the archive. (In case
you had access to the archive but not the branch) Based on your reply
I guess the answer is that you can.

Thank you for your patience!
Sveinung

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I tried to uploaded it to REVU a while ago as requested. I can't see
that it has shown up. Please note that this is an updated version and
not a new package. Does REVU block updates to packages already in
Ubuntu? In that case I can upload it somewhere else.

By the way, am I correct to assume that you also will take care of
merging ( https://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions
/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/8652 ) the branch as well?

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 378419] Re: libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just to document it: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic
contains a fix for this. Since it also fixes bug 345706 and bug 345706
already is in the sponsor queue I haven't added this bug to the queue.

-- 
libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378419
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
A debdiff that fixes this in torbutton is attached to bug 401282

** Also affects: torbutton (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Added a fix to bug 272959. Updated patch (debdiffv2.patch) attached.


** Attachment added: "debdiffv2.patch"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257150/debdiffv2.patch

-- 
Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Debdiff that adds Firefox-3.5 as an alternative dependency.


** Attachment added: "debdiff.patch"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29241409/debdiff.patch

-- 
Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Torbutton should have Firefox 3.5 as an alernative in depends

** Affects: torbutton (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)
 Status: New

** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)

-- 
Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar
  
  all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
  
-   * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5
+   * new upstream release (LP: #398535)
+   * list firefox-3.5 as alternate dependency
  
   -- Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik   Sun, 12
- Jul 2009 21:32:11 +0200
+ Jul 2009 21:05:07 +0200

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398535] [NEW] please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-07-12 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar

all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low

  * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5

 -- Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik   Sun, 12
Jul 2009 21:32:11 +0200

** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-07-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Updated fix in branch lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic that
also contains a fix for bug 378419

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-05-11 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I was told on #ubuntu-devel that a SRU for this is unlikely, so I won't
try a sru unless it gets more likely.

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-30 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed:

  libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes
  with Ubuntu) can't find it. The bug has been addressed in the branch
  ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit by moving it to
  /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/.
  
  To reproduce the bug try to build KPackageKit after removing its local copy 
of FindQPackageKit.cmake:
  apt-get source kpackagekit
  cd kpackagekit-0.4
  rm cmake/modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake
  dpkg-buildpackage
  
- The regression potential from this bug: programs buildt that are
+ The regression potential from this fix: programs buildt that are
  searching for QPackageKit using CMake will now find it. This can cause
  different behavior from the resulting program than before. If the
- program being built contains bugs that are dependent on PackageKit
- support those could surface.
+ program being built contains bugs in features that only will get
+ activated if QPackageKit can be found those would surface together with
+ the feature.

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-29 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I think I'll try to get a SRU anyway since a project I want to add some
patches that depends on QPackageKit too say having working versions in
the distros increases my chances of getting it accepted. According to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates the fix must first be in
the current development release. I'll continue when it's in.

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-29 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: packagekit
- 
  libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes
- with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to
- /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's possible to
- use it. I'm extremely new to CMake, but shouldn't FindQPackageKit.cmake
- have been installed in /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ where CMake can
- find it?
+ with Ubuntu) can't find it. The bug has been addressed in the branch
+ ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit by moving it to
+ /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/.
+ 
+ To reproduce the bug try to build KPackageKit after removing its local copy 
of FindQPackageKit.cmake:
+ apt-get source kpackagekit
+ cd kpackagekit-0.4
+ rm cmake/modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake
+ dpkg-buildpackage
+ 
+ The regression potential from this bug: programs buildt that are
+ searching for QPackageKit using CMake will now find it. This can cause
+ different behavior from the resulting program than before. If the
+ program being built contains bugs that are dependent on PackageKit
+ support those could surface.

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
James: Thank you for the clarification. I had actually retargeted it for
karmic, but if you think this is serious enough to try to get a SRU I
could give it a try.

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-23 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Updated my bazaar branch containing the fix since another packagekit
0.3.14-0ubuntu5 was released and Jaunty already is out

** Branch unlinked: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-30 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Sebastian: Does this mean that I now have an ack and can subscribe
ubuntu-main-sponsors or should I do something else?

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
In case the correct solution to this simply is to install to
/usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ instead of /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ the
fix is in the branch ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345706] [NEW] CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: packagekit

libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to
/usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes
with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to
/usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's possible to
use it. I'm extremely new to CMake, but shouldn't FindQPackageKit.cmake
have been installed in /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ where CMake can
find it?

** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 340806] Re: [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-17 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed:

- pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
+ [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

-- 
[intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 340806] Re: pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
However it works for the version in the PackageKit ppa. Should this be
fixed in vanilla Intrepid?

-- 
pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 340806] [NEW] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: packagekit

After a 'pkcon refresh' 'pkcon get-updates' won't list the new updates
that are available. Adept will however notice the new updates and pop up
the update icon and a notification. If I do an 'apt-get update' 'pkcon
get-updates' will list them. I run 'pkcon refresh' and 'pkcon get-
updates' as a normal user that has org.freedesktop.packagekit.system-
update and org.freedesktop.packagekit.system-sources-refresh. This is
with packagekit-0.3.6-0ubuntu4 on Ubuntu Intrepid on an amd64 machine.

** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't

2009-02-20 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Upstream just marked my previous mentioned bugreport as a dupe of
http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=564 Since
Launchpad still can't track upsream's bugtracker (Flyspray, see bug
#28738 for status on this) I'm posting the new URL here.

-- 
Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
new version in Debian. Pleace sync kdiff3 version 0.9.94-1 from Debian
main experimental

-- 
kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-15 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
The KDE4 version is now in Debian experimental.

Pleace sync the package kdiff3 version 0.9.93-3-1 from Debian
experimental main

-- 
kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-09 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #479316
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316

** Also affects: kdiff3 (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )

2009-01-01 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
[Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP 
(Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to knetworkmanager in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )

2008-12-31 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
[Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP 
(Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to knetworkmanager in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 218658] Re: FTBFS dbus-java

2008-12-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
FTBFS dbus-java
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-12-15 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: firefox-extensions
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 291499] Re: Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4

2008-12-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279654 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279654
   firefox hangup while drag text in kde4

-- 
Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 279654] Re: firefox hangup while drag text in kde4

2008-12-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Setting status to confirmed based on the many confirmations in this bug
and that I myself could reproduce it

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
firefox hangup while drag text in kde4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-20 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just one more thing: What do I do now? Should I just wait or should I do
something (for example subscribe Universe Sponsors)? I didn't see
anything on the wiki about subscribing them so I guessed the Mozilla
team would sponsor the package and merge it into their tree if ready,
but if I have missed a part of the development process when it comes to
Firefox extensions maintained in Bazaar would be nice to know what I
should do next.

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar
  
  all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
  
-   * new upstream release (0.7.6)
+   * new upstream release  (LP: #297708)
* contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037)
* No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959)
* Added watchfile

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Done. Thank you for your feedback!

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: firefox-extensions
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-16 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed:

- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
+ REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar
  
- all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low
+ all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
  
+   * new upstream release (0.7.6)
+   * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037)
* No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959)
* Added watchfile
- 
- I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug
- 217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it.

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Thank you. New branch at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-
sidebar.ubuntu.try2

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 217037] Re: Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217037
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Here is a patch that fixes it. It also adds a little more information
to the description.

changes:
  * kio-sword is no longer available (LP: #297908)
  * Expanded the description a little


** Attachment added: "sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19632567/sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: sword-text-tr

sword-text-tr refers to kio-sword, but it isn't available any more.

** Affects: sword-text-tr (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
my updated packaging can be found at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions
/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 297708] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar

all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low

  * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959)
  * Added watchfile

I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug
217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it.

** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder

2008-11-12 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Axos: Thank you. In order to get credit for fixing it here is what you
do (in case you don't already know):

cd to a new folder

apt-get source libmatthew-java # you will need the original anyway, and
if you didn't increase the changelog before you don't have the original
but a changed thing

cd libmatthew-java-0.7.1

dch -i # edit the changelog

# write what you did, for example: * Makefile: Added -fno-stack-protector to 
CFLAGS
# check that your name and email are correct. Be careful with the formating
# change distro in the top line (after libmatthew-java (0.7.1-1ubuntu2)) to 
Jaunty
# save the changelog

# change libmatthew-java so dbus-java will build

debuild # build it.
cd ..

# Test the new version. (That it fixed the bug, that it builds on jaunty
etc) To see if it builds on Jaunty you can use
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Intro/Pbuilder

debdiff libmatthew-java_0.7.1-1ubuntu1.dsc libmatthew-
java_0.7.1-1ubuntu2.dsc >> libmatthew.debdiff

# Upload libmatthew.debdiff to this bug.
# If you have tested it enough subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors

** Summary changed:

- dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
+ FTBFS dbus-java

-- 
FTBFS dbus-java
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder

2008-11-11 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
A libnanoxml2-java that builds in my Jaunty chroot uploaded to
mentors.debian.net

-- 
FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Summary changed:

- FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
+ FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

** Description changed:

- libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath.
- Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it
- fails to build.
+ libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-jdk-builddep is based on GNU
+ Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-jdk-builddep is based on OpenJDK
+ (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build.

-- 
FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 295686] [NEW] FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported:

libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath.
Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it
fails to build.

** Affects: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik)
 Status: In Progress

-- 
FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Could you create a new Ubuntu account (or you don't have permission to
do that: create an extra Firefox profile) and see if you can reproduce
the problem there too?

-- 
Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just a few comments:
* Even if I was not able to reproduce the bug by following the steps above 
letter by letter, I remember the thing about navigation hanging so I am quite 
sure that this is the same bug I used to see.
* I'm using the Hardy packages firefox 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3, privoxy 
3.0.8-1 and tor 0.1.2.19-2 on an amd64 system
* The reason I haven't added a remote bugwatch is that launchpad isn't able to 
import it. See 28738

** Summary changed:

- Torbutton does not install
+ Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't

-- 
Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I was still not able to reproduce it, but since I have seen it myself
before i filed it upstream as
http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=832

** Also affects: torbutton
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Torbutton does not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
One more thing: Could you please check that it is in fact Torbutton
1.2.0 and not a Release Candidate you have? You can check by right
clicking on the Torbutton and choose About Torbutton. (RC6 was on
addons.mozilla.org) I wasn't able to reproduce the "green but not
connected" error with 1.2.0, even if I have seen it before.

-- 
Torbutton does not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I am not able to find any Ubuntu specific changes to strings. I have an
extremely limited understanding of the Ubuntu process, but I guess this
means that an UserInterfaceFreeze Exception is not required. In case it
is: There are changes in the user interface when it comes to configure
the new features. But as previously said: the alternative is to have a
Torbutton that don't work with Firefox.

Is this enough information to apply for a feature freeze exception? If
it is, should it be done now or after my changes are reviewed?

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Install log:
# dpkg -i 
/var/cache/pbuilder/intrepid-amd64/result/torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb
(Les database ... 217332 filer og katalogar er installerte.)
Gjer klar til å byta ut torbutton-extension 1.2.0-1ubuntu1 (ved bruk av 
.../torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Pakkar ut erstattinga torbutton-extension ...
Set opp torbutton-extension (1.2.0-1ubuntu1) ...

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
The new version of Torbutton will work with Firefox 3. It has
additional features like blocking scripts and plugins that could leak
traffic from Tor. This avoids people listening to the connection or at
the destination to figure out the real IP.

This change will support Firefox 3. There's no Firefox 2 in Intrepid.
Also it give enhanced security. (See above)

It lacks Thunderbird support unlike the old one.

Testing:
* I am currently using this. It works fine.
http://check.torproject.net/ confirms I am using Tor
* I have attached the buildlog from pbuilder as buildlog.txt
* It installs without problems on my system.
* It works. Attached screenshot as proof


** Attachment added: "buildlog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239680/buildlog.txt

** Attachment added: "torbutton.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239681/torbutton.png

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Debdiff from the version currently in Intrepid (1.0.4-3ubuntu2) and
diffstat on it.


** Attachment added: "diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238628/diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2

** Attachment added: "fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238629/fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Seems like Torbutton have changed in Ubuntu since I made my debdiff.
Here is a new one where I have tried to merge the Ubuntu changes.
(Added abrowser as a dependency to control and added the changelog
entry)


** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238406/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Setting confirmed since I have had those issues as well.

The reason that it does not show up in Firefox 3 is that the version of
Torbutton in Ubuntu is old and not made for Firefox 3. Bug 247867
already covers that.

When it comes to the other issue you mention: Does it still pretend to
be using Tor without actually using it when Tor and Privoxy is
installed? You can check by going to http://check.torproject.net/ (If it
does it will make it easier to find out where this bug is)

** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Torbutton does not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Are you going to apply for a feature freeze exception?
Yes, but I'm not sure I will have time to do it before after the weekend.

In case anyone else wants to file one before that: feature list
(upstreams): https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbutton/trunk/src/CHANGELOG
(also attached)


** Attachment added: "CHANGELOG"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18162264/CHANGELOG

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Unfortunately your merge of 1.2.0 doesn't appear to be attached
> to the bug, so I can't review it.
Ops! Sorry about that. Here it it is.


** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18160424/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: vlc
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: vlc
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-23 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Marking as "In Progress" since it seems like 0.9.2 (that includes my
patch) will be uploaded to Intrepid. (See bug 270404)

** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270404] Re: Please update VLC to 0.9.2

2008-09-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Is it to late to add LP: 261567 to the Changelog?

-- 
Please update VLC to 0.9.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
0.9.2-1 is now in Debian experimental.

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-17 Thread Sveinung
fixed released upstreams (0.9.2)

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder

2008-09-16 Thread Sveinung
The reason for the failiure have changed from 2.3.1-1 to 2.5-4. I
suspect this is a problem in libmatthew since it until recently refused
to build and the failure in dbus-java is that the symbol about
__stack_chk_fail_local not beeing defined in /usr/lib/jni/libunix-
java.so, a part of libmatthew-java. I am not sure if the old error is
gone. The new error is:

make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/dbus-java-2.5'
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni 
-classpath 
:/usr/share/java/unix.jar:/usr/share/java/hexdump.jar:/usr/share/java/debug-disable.jar:libdbus-java-2.5.jar:dbus-java-test-2.5.jar
 org.freedesktop.dbus.test.test
Creating Connection
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: 
/usr/lib/jni/libunix-java.so: /usr/lib/jni/libunix-java.so: undefined symbol: 
__stack_chk_fail_local
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1767)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1692)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:840)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1047)
at cx.ath.matthew.unix.UnixSocket.(UnixSocket.java:33)
at org.freedesktop.dbus.Transport.connect(Transport.java:765)
at org.freedesktop.dbus.Transport.(Transport.java:730)
at org.freedesktop.dbus.DBusConnection.(DBusConnection.java:159)
at 
org.freedesktop.dbus.DBusConnection.getConnection(DBusConnection.java:142)
at org.freedesktop.dbus.test.test.main(test.java:422)

Session terminated, killing shell...make[1]: *** wait: No child
processes.  Stop.

-- 
dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-14 Thread Sveinung
Applied upstreams in revision 7e3eb6484a1f3f9eafdf15e6e386b76a789a2a97
See http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/browser/share/applications

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 267264] [NEW] Please move dbus-java to universe

2008-09-06 Thread Sveinung
Public bug reported:

dbus-java is in debian main. The version from Debian main have now been
synced (see bug 204704), so there are no unfree dependencies. Pleace
move it to universe.

** Affects: dbus-java (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  dbus-java is in debian main. The version from Debian main have now been
  synced (see bug 204704), so there are no unfree dependencies. Pleace
- move it to main.
+ move it to universe.

-- 
Please move dbus-java to universe
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567]

2008-08-27 Thread Sveinung
Here is a quickly made debdiff.
- I did not change debian/vlc.mime since shared-mime-info has the mime
type for flv
- I may have overlooked things
- against the current (vlc_0.8.6.release.h-1ubuntu1) version in Intrepid.
- since I could not find documentation for the preferred numbering of
patches in debian/patches the patch has no number in the name
- VLC seems to have a dependency problem, so I could not test this in
pbuilder. Since all this changes it a line in a desktop file, and I
have tested it by doing the modification by hand on the installed
desktop file, I think it will work when the problem is fixed.
- It may have other problems as well. This is the first time I have
done anything with quilt, so be even more careful than normal.


** Attachment added: "try2.debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17111973/try2.debdiff

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-08-26 Thread Sveinung
reported upstreams: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-
devel/2008-August/048830.html

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 261567] [NEW] VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-08-26 Thread Sveinung
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: vlc

VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a
handler for it.

** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for 
it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 204374] Re: application/x-flash-video (.flv) should have a "video-x-generic" icon

2008-08-25 Thread Sveinung
Fixed in intrepid

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #14982
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14982

** Also affects: shared-mime-info via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14982
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: shared-mime-info (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
application/x-flash-video (.flv) should have a "video-x-generic" icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 204374] Re: application/x-flash-video (.flv) should have a "video-x-generic" icon

2008-08-25 Thread Sveinung
I found this in the Intrepid package and it seems to fix this bug:
  
Flash video
...
Ảnh động Flash


  





  

I did a quick test in a chroot and the video icon is there.

-- 
application/x-flash-video (.flv) should have a "video-x-generic" icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253836] Re: KDissert refuse to regenerate document

2008-08-21 Thread Sveinung
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #496012
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496012

** Also affects: kdissert (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496012
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
KDissert refuse to regenerate document
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253836
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-11 Thread Sveinung
I have attached a debdiff against the new version if it is preferred.
It works on
my Hardy system (tested at http://check.torproject.net/).

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-10 Thread Sveinung
Torbutton 1.2.0 is now in Debian. Should I try to merge the new version
instead?

-- 
Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >