[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
I was told on #ubuntu-devel that a SRU for this is unlikely, so I won't try a sru unless it gets more likely. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: packagekit - libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes - with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to - /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's possible to - use it. I'm extremely new to CMake, but shouldn't FindQPackageKit.cmake - have been installed in /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ where CMake can - find it? + with Ubuntu) can't find it. The bug has been addressed in the branch + ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit by moving it to + /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/. + + To reproduce the bug try to build KPackageKit after removing its local copy of FindQPackageKit.cmake: + apt-get source kpackagekit + cd kpackagekit-0.4 + rm cmake/modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake + dpkg-buildpackage + + The regression potential from this bug: programs buildt that are + searching for QPackageKit using CMake will now find it. This can cause + different behavior from the resulting program than before. If the + program being built contains bugs that are dependent on PackageKit + support those could surface. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
I think I'll try to get a SRU anyway since a project I want to add some patches that depends on QPackageKit too say having working versions in the distros increases my chances of getting it accepted. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates the fix must first be in the current development release. I'll continue when it's in. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
** Description changed: libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes with Ubuntu) can't find it. The bug has been addressed in the branch ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit by moving it to /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/. To reproduce the bug try to build KPackageKit after removing its local copy of FindQPackageKit.cmake: apt-get source kpackagekit cd kpackagekit-0.4 rm cmake/modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake dpkg-buildpackage - The regression potential from this bug: programs buildt that are + The regression potential from this fix: programs buildt that are searching for QPackageKit using CMake will now find it. This can cause different behavior from the resulting program than before. If the - program being built contains bugs that are dependent on PackageKit - support those could surface. + program being built contains bugs in features that only will get + activated if QPackageKit can be found those would surface together with + the feature. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
Updated fix in branch lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic that also contains a fix for bug 378419 -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398535] [NEW] please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5 -- Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:32:11 +0200 ** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low - * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5 + * new upstream release (LP: #398535) + * list firefox-3.5 as alternate dependency -- Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik Sun, 12 - Jul 2009 21:32:11 +0200 + Jul 2009 21:05:07 +0200 -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
Public bug reported: Torbutton should have Firefox 3.5 as an alernative in depends ** Affects: torbutton (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New ** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) -- Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
Debdiff that adds Firefox-3.5 as an alternative dependency. ** Attachment added: "debdiff.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29241409/debdiff.patch -- Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5
Added a fix to bug 272959. Updated patch (debdiffv2.patch) attached. ** Attachment added: "debdiffv2.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257150/debdiffv2.patch -- Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
A debdiff that fixes this in torbutton is attached to bug 401282 ** Also affects: torbutton (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378419] Re: libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt
Just to document it: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic contains a fix for this. Since it also fixes bug 345706 and bug 345706 already is in the sponsor queue I haven't added this bug to the queue. -- libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
new version in Debian. Pleace sync kdiff3 version 0.9.94-1 from Debian main experimental -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340806] [NEW] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit After a 'pkcon refresh' 'pkcon get-updates' won't list the new updates that are available. Adept will however notice the new updates and pop up the update icon and a notification. If I do an 'apt-get update' 'pkcon get-updates' will list them. I run 'pkcon refresh' and 'pkcon get- updates' as a normal user that has org.freedesktop.packagekit.system- update and org.freedesktop.packagekit.system-sources-refresh. This is with packagekit-0.3.6-0ubuntu4 on Ubuntu Intrepid on an amd64 machine. ** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340806] Re: pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
However it works for the version in the PackageKit ppa. Should this be fixed in vanilla Intrepid? -- pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
Upstream just marked my previous mentioned bugreport as a dupe of http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=564 Since Launchpad still can't track upsream's bugtracker (Flyspray, see bug #28738 for status on this) I'm posting the new URL here. -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340806] Re: [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
** Summary changed: - pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh + [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh -- [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] [NEW] CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's possible to use it. I'm extremely new to CMake, but shouldn't FindQPackageKit.cmake have been installed in /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ where CMake can find it? ** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
In case the correct solution to this simply is to install to /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ instead of /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ the fix is in the branch ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
Updated my bazaar branch containing the fix since another packagekit 0.3.14-0ubuntu5 was released and Jaunty already is out ** Branch unlinked: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
James: Thank you for the clarification. I had actually retargeted it for karmic, but if you think this is serious enough to try to get a SRU I could give it a try. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
Sebastian: Does this mean that I now have an ack and can subscribe ubuntu-main-sponsors or should I do something else? -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
I tried to uploaded it to REVU a while ago as requested. I can't see that it has shown up. Please note that this is an updated version and not a new package. Does REVU block updates to packages already in Ubuntu? In that case I can upload it somewhere else. By the way, am I correct to assume that you also will take care of merging ( https://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions /all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/8652 ) the branch as well? -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
> I know this is a new upstream release, that's why I asked you to put it > on REVU for a better review. Good to know. I was confused after reading "If you packaged a new upstream version (of a package that is already in the archives), and you want to get it sponsored, do not use REVU to get it sponsored" in the wiki when my upload didn't work. > So please try again, maybe you didnt push > it properly. Seems like it was uploaded but not accepted. When I signed it again using my old (expired) gpg-key instead of the new one (that I uploaded to Launchpad today) it was accepted. It can now be found at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/all-in-one-sidebar > Why do you want to merge it into ubuntu-dev? by doing it > you won't be able to push stuff into that branch anymore. What do you > think? Sorry if I didn't express myself clear. I was wondering if you could do the merge if/when you upload the package to the archive. (In case you had access to the archive but not the branch) Based on your reply I guess the answer is that you can. Thank you for your patience! Sveinung -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 398535]
> 1) you forgot adding some changelog's entry Not sure if I understand what you meant here. Please explain. If you mean from bazaar: I don't think "open tree for development" belong in the debian changelog when it's closed again. (See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Packaging where it instructs me to remove it from the Debain changelog in the end) Or should "new upstream release (LP: #398535)" be "RELEASE all-in-one-sidebar v0.7.10 to ubuntu karmic (LP: #398535)"? > 2) there are two minor lintian warnings Fixed one. I don't have time right now to check it for Debian policy 3.8.2 right now so it would be nice if it could be uploaded anyway like you offered. -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 398535]
> Look here for the missing changelog entry: > https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/all-in-one-sidebar Seems like 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 disappeared when 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 got uploaded since it weren't pushed to the bazaar branch and 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 was based on the version in the bazaar branch (0.7.4-0ubuntu1). > Anyway you should include every change that the package had before your new > package, so you will have to add the missing changelog entry plus its changes. Sure. In order to preserve history I put 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 on top of 0.7.4-0ubuntu1 (in the branch) and merged it into the newest version. That way the history will make sense for the changes from 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 that suddenly appears in the newer version. I kept the change log entry and watch file from 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 since it was better then the one currently in all-in-one-sidebar. The rest had already been done. > For the other lintian warning, just go to debian/control and bump > Standards-version to 3.8.2 and you're done. It will take like 1 minute. So the package follow policy? The CDBS magic takes care of it? Cool. Done. Thank you very much for your help! Sveinung -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Thank you very much for your help uploading and for your feedback. -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
The KDE4 version is now in Debian experimental. Pleace sync the package kdiff3 version 0.9.93-3-1 from Debian experimental main -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #479316 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316 ** Also affects: kdiff3 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )
** Also affects: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to knetworkmanager in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )
** Changed in: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to knetworkmanager in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Done. Thank you for your feedback! -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low - * new upstream release (0.7.6) + * new upstream release (LP: #297708) * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037) * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Just one more thing: What do I do now? Should I just wait or should I do something (for example subscribe Universe Sponsors)? I didn't see anything on the wiki about subscribing them so I guessed the Mozilla team would sponsor the package and merge it into their tree if ready, but if I have missed a part of the development process when it comes to Firefox extensions maintained in Bazaar would be nice to know what I should do next. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279654] Re: firefox hangup while drag text in kde4
Setting status to confirmed based on the many confirmations in this bug and that I myself could reproduce it ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- firefox hangup while drag text in kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291499] Re: Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279654 firefox hangup while drag text in kde4 -- Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: New => Fix Released -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218658] Re: FTBFS dbus-java
** Changed in: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- FTBFS dbus-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
Axos: Thank you. In order to get credit for fixing it here is what you do (in case you don't already know): cd to a new folder apt-get source libmatthew-java # you will need the original anyway, and if you didn't increase the changelog before you don't have the original but a changed thing cd libmatthew-java-0.7.1 dch -i # edit the changelog # write what you did, for example: * Makefile: Added -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS # check that your name and email are correct. Be careful with the formating # change distro in the top line (after libmatthew-java (0.7.1-1ubuntu2)) to Jaunty # save the changelog # change libmatthew-java so dbus-java will build debuild # build it. cd .. # Test the new version. (That it fixed the bug, that it builds on jaunty etc) To see if it builds on Jaunty you can use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Intro/Pbuilder debdiff libmatthew-java_0.7.1-1ubuntu1.dsc libmatthew- java_0.7.1-1ubuntu2.dsc >> libmatthew.debdiff # Upload libmatthew.debdiff to this bug. # If you have tested it enough subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors ** Summary changed: - dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder + FTBFS dbus-java -- FTBFS dbus-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug 217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it. ** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
my updated packaging can be found at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions /all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sword-text-tr sword-text-tr refers to kio-sword, but it isn't available any more. ** Affects: sword-text-tr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
Here is a patch that fixes it. It also adds a little more information to the description. changes: * kio-sword is no longer available (LP: #297908) * Expanded the description a little ** Attachment added: "sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19632567/sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff -- refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217037] Re: Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress -- Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217037 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
Thank you. New branch at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one- sidebar.ubuntu.try2 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Summary changed: - REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar + REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar - all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low + all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low + * new upstream release (0.7.6) + * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037) * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile - - I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug - 217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] [NEW] FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
Public bug reported: libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build. ** Affects: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: In Progress -- FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
** Changed in: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress ** Summary changed: - FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath + FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath ** Description changed: - libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath. - Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it - fails to build. + libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-jdk-builddep is based on GNU + Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-jdk-builddep is based on OpenJDK + (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build. -- FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
A libnanoxml2-java that builds in my Jaunty chroot uploaded to mentors.debian.net -- FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
** Also affects: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
Setting confirmed since I have had those issues as well. The reason that it does not show up in Firefox 3 is that the version of Torbutton in Ubuntu is old and not made for Firefox 3. Bug 247867 already covers that. When it comes to the other issue you mention: Does it still pretend to be using Tor without actually using it when Tor and Privoxy is installed? You can check by going to http://check.torproject.net/ (If it does it will make it easier to find out where this bug is) ** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Seems like Torbutton have changed in Ubuntu since I made my debdiff. Here is a new one where I have tried to merge the Ubuntu changes. (Added abrowser as a dependency to control and added the changelog entry) ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238406/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Debdiff from the version currently in Intrepid (1.0.4-3ubuntu2) and diffstat on it. ** Attachment added: "diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238628/diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: "fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238629/fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
The new version of Torbutton will work with Firefox 3. It has additional features like blocking scripts and plugins that could leak traffic from Tor. This avoids people listening to the connection or at the destination to figure out the real IP. This change will support Firefox 3. There's no Firefox 2 in Intrepid. Also it give enhanced security. (See above) It lacks Thunderbird support unlike the old one. Testing: * I am currently using this. It works fine. http://check.torproject.net/ confirms I am using Tor * I have attached the buildlog from pbuilder as buildlog.txt * It installs without problems on my system. * It works. Attached screenshot as proof ** Attachment added: "buildlog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239680/buildlog.txt ** Attachment added: "torbutton.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239681/torbutton.png -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Install log: # dpkg -i /var/cache/pbuilder/intrepid-amd64/result/torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb (Les database ... 217332 filer og katalogar er installerte.) Gjer klar til å byta ut torbutton-extension 1.2.0-1ubuntu1 (ved bruk av .../torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Pakkar ut erstattinga torbutton-extension ... Set opp torbutton-extension (1.2.0-1ubuntu1) ... -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I am not able to find any Ubuntu specific changes to strings. I have an extremely limited understanding of the Ubuntu process, but I guess this means that an UserInterfaceFreeze Exception is not required. In case it is: There are changes in the user interface when it comes to configure the new features. But as previously said: the alternative is to have a Torbutton that don't work with Firefox. Is this enough information to apply for a feature freeze exception? If it is, should it be done now or after my changes are reviewed? -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
One more thing: Could you please check that it is in fact Torbutton 1.2.0 and not a Release Candidate you have? You can check by right clicking on the Torbutton and choose About Torbutton. (RC6 was on addons.mozilla.org) I wasn't able to reproduce the "green but not connected" error with 1.2.0, even if I have seen it before. -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
I was still not able to reproduce it, but since I have seen it myself before i filed it upstream as http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=832 ** Also affects: torbutton Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
Just a few comments: * Even if I was not able to reproduce the bug by following the steps above letter by letter, I remember the thing about navigation hanging so I am quite sure that this is the same bug I used to see. * I'm using the Hardy packages firefox 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3, privoxy 3.0.8-1 and tor 0.1.2.19-2 on an amd64 system * The reason I haven't added a remote bugwatch is that launchpad isn't able to import it. See 28738 ** Summary changed: - Torbutton does not install + Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
Could you create a new Ubuntu account (or you don't have permission to do that: create an extra Firefox profile) and see if you can reproduce the problem there too? -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
> Unfortunately your merge of 1.2.0 doesn't appear to be attached > to the bug, so I can't review it. Ops! Sorry about that. Here it it is. ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18160424/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
> Are you going to apply for a feature freeze exception? Yes, but I'm not sure I will have time to do it before after the weekend. In case anyone else wants to file one before that: feature list (upstreams): https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbutton/trunk/src/CHANGELOG (also attached) ** Attachment added: "CHANGELOG" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18162264/CHANGELOG -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
0.9.2-1 is now in Debian experimental. -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270404] Re: Please update VLC to 0.9.2
Is it to late to add LP: 261567 to the Changelog? -- Please update VLC to 0.9.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
Marking as "In Progress" since it seems like 0.9.2 (that includes my patch) will be uploaded to Intrepid. (See bug 270404) ** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
** Also affects: vlc Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vlc Status: New => Fix Released -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
> Unfortunately your merge of 1.2.0 doesn't appear to be attached > to the bug, so I can't review it. Ops! Sorry about that. Here it it is. ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18160424/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
> Are you going to apply for a feature freeze exception? Yes, but I'm not sure I will have time to do it before after the weekend. In case anyone else wants to file one before that: feature list (upstreams): https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbutton/trunk/src/CHANGELOG (also attached) ** Attachment added: "CHANGELOG" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18162264/CHANGELOG -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
Setting confirmed since I have had those issues as well. The reason that it does not show up in Firefox 3 is that the version of Torbutton in Ubuntu is old and not made for Firefox 3. Bug 247867 already covers that. When it comes to the other issue you mention: Does it still pretend to be using Tor without actually using it when Tor and Privoxy is installed? You can check by going to http://check.torproject.net/ (If it does it will make it easier to find out where this bug is) ** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Seems like Torbutton have changed in Ubuntu since I made my debdiff. Here is a new one where I have tried to merge the Ubuntu changes. (Added abrowser as a dependency to control and added the changelog entry) ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238406/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Debdiff from the version currently in Intrepid (1.0.4-3ubuntu2) and diffstat on it. ** Attachment added: "diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238628/diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: "fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238629/fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
The new version of Torbutton will work with Firefox 3. It has additional features like blocking scripts and plugins that could leak traffic from Tor. This avoids people listening to the connection or at the destination to figure out the real IP. This change will support Firefox 3. There's no Firefox 2 in Intrepid. Also it give enhanced security. (See above) It lacks Thunderbird support unlike the old one. Testing: * I am currently using this. It works fine. http://check.torproject.net/ confirms I am using Tor * I have attached the buildlog from pbuilder as buildlog.txt * It installs without problems on my system. * It works. Attached screenshot as proof ** Attachment added: "buildlog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239680/buildlog.txt ** Attachment added: "torbutton.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239681/torbutton.png -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Install log: # dpkg -i /var/cache/pbuilder/intrepid-amd64/result/torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb (Les database ... 217332 filer og katalogar er installerte.) Gjer klar til å byta ut torbutton-extension 1.2.0-1ubuntu1 (ved bruk av .../torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Pakkar ut erstattinga torbutton-extension ... Set opp torbutton-extension (1.2.0-1ubuntu1) ... -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I am not able to find any Ubuntu specific changes to strings. I have an extremely limited understanding of the Ubuntu process, but I guess this means that an UserInterfaceFreeze Exception is not required. In case it is: There are changes in the user interface when it comes to configure the new features. But as previously said: the alternative is to have a Torbutton that don't work with Firefox. Is this enough information to apply for a feature freeze exception? If it is, should it be done now or after my changes are reviewed? -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
One more thing: Could you please check that it is in fact Torbutton 1.2.0 and not a Release Candidate you have? You can check by right clicking on the Torbutton and choose About Torbutton. (RC6 was on addons.mozilla.org) I wasn't able to reproduce the "green but not connected" error with 1.2.0, even if I have seen it before. -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
I was still not able to reproduce it, but since I have seen it myself before i filed it upstream as http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=832 ** Also affects: torbutton Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install
Just a few comments: * Even if I was not able to reproduce the bug by following the steps above letter by letter, I remember the thing about navigation hanging so I am quite sure that this is the same bug I used to see. * I'm using the Hardy packages firefox 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3, privoxy 3.0.8-1 and tor 0.1.2.19-2 on an amd64 system * The reason I haven't added a remote bugwatch is that launchpad isn't able to import it. See 28738 ** Summary changed: - Torbutton does not install + Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't
Could you create a new Ubuntu account (or you don't have permission to do that: create an extra Firefox profile) and see if you can reproduce the problem there too? -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
0.9.2-1 is now in Debian experimental. -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270404] Re: Please update VLC to 0.9.2
Is it to late to add LP: 261567 to the Changelog? -- Please update VLC to 0.9.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
Marking as "In Progress" since it seems like 0.9.2 (that includes my patch) will be uploaded to Intrepid. (See bug 270404) ** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it
** Also affects: vlc Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vlc Status: New => Fix Released -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
** Also affects: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder
Axos: Thank you. In order to get credit for fixing it here is what you do (in case you don't already know): cd to a new folder apt-get source libmatthew-java # you will need the original anyway, and if you didn't increase the changelog before you don't have the original but a changed thing cd libmatthew-java-0.7.1 dch -i # edit the changelog # write what you did, for example: * Makefile: Added -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS # check that your name and email are correct. Be careful with the formating # change distro in the top line (after libmatthew-java (0.7.1-1ubuntu2)) to Jaunty # save the changelog # change libmatthew-java so dbus-java will build debuild # build it. cd .. # Test the new version. (That it fixed the bug, that it builds on jaunty etc) To see if it builds on Jaunty you can use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Intro/Pbuilder debdiff libmatthew-java_0.7.1-1ubuntu1.dsc libmatthew- java_0.7.1-1ubuntu2.dsc >> libmatthew.debdiff # Upload libmatthew.debdiff to this bug. # If you have tested it enough subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors ** Summary changed: - dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder + FTBFS dbus-java -- FTBFS dbus-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug 217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it. ** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
my updated packaging can be found at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions /all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sword-text-tr sword-text-tr refers to kio-sword, but it isn't available any more. ** Affects: sword-text-tr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more
Here is a patch that fixes it. It also adds a little more information to the description. changes: * kio-sword is no longer available (LP: #297908) * Expanded the description a little ** Attachment added: "sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19632567/sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff -- refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217037] Re: Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress -- Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217037 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
Thank you. New branch at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one- sidebar.ubuntu.try2 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] [NEW] FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
Public bug reported: libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build. ** Affects: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: In Progress -- FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
** Changed in: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress ** Summary changed: - FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath + FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath ** Description changed: - libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath. - Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it - fails to build. + libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-jdk-builddep is based on GNU + Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-jdk-builddep is based on OpenJDK + (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build. -- FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath
A libnanoxml2-java that builds in my Jaunty chroot uploaded to mentors.debian.net -- FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Summary changed: - REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar + REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar - all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low + all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low + * new upstream release (0.7.6) + * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037) * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile - - I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug - 217037 fixed but if you told me I could do it. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Done. Thank you for your feedback! -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low - * new upstream release (0.7.6) + * new upstream release (LP: #297708) * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037) * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
