[Bug 1741934] Re: Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate kernels for PTI fix)
when will this be in the main repositories? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 Title: Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate kernels for PTI fix) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1741934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1578576] Re: ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp report segfault
running an Apache2 server with NTLM authentication against an AD, stopped working with 500 Internal Server error since the Samba upgrade. Apache config: AuthType NTLM AuthName "..." NTLMAuth on NTLMAuthHelper "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-.5-ntlmssp" NTLMBasicAuthoritative on require valid-user Syslog: May 9 08:41:17 intranet-gvp kernel: [438844.377831] ntlm_auth[23011]: segfault at 8 ip 7f512efcf9b0 sp 7ffc8017cc78 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f512efc4000+1b000] May 9 08:41:23 intranet-gvp kernel: [438849.956323] ntlm_auth[23148]: segfault at 8 ip 7f39b08e99b0 sp 7fff4ba86bb8 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f39b08de000+1b000] May 9 08:41:30 intranet-gvp kernel: [438856.430960] ntlm_auth[23240]: segfault at 8 ip 7f96a55309b0 sp 7ffe0a7eaa98 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f96a5525000+1b000] May 9 08:43:30 intranet-gvp kernel: [438977.462065] ntlm_auth[25264]: segfault at 8 ip 7f874faf29b0 sp 7ffd417d0478 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f874fae7000+1b000] May 9 08:45:03 intranet-gvp kernel: [439070.043363] ntlm_auth[28559]: segfault at 8 ip 7fb5af4769b0 sp 7ffcc2b84918 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7fb5af46b000+1b000] May 9 08:47:12 intranet-gvp kernel: [439199.384723] ntlm_auth[30675]: segfault at 8 ip 7f357d1439b0 sp 7ffef1ea7c98 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f357d138000+1b000] May 9 08:47:25 intranet-gvp kernel: [439211.944010] ntlm_auth[30822]: segfault at 8 ip 7f89a24e49b0 sp 7b32b3c8 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7f89a24d9000+1b000] May 9 08:50:12 intranet-gvp kernel: [439379.146404] ntlm_auth[1121]: segfault at 8 ip 7fdb6f7d19b0 sp 7ffcf44e5728 error 4 in libsamba-security.so.0[7fdb6f7c6000+1b000] After rollback to Samba packages 4.3.8, the system is running again. $ pgrep ntlm -a 2192 ntlm_auth 4951 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 4952 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 4953 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 6074 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 6503 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 6596 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 15376 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 17037 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp 17149 /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578576 Title: ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp report segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1578576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081842] Re: [cinnamon] Cinnamon Menu not working properly
running on a fresh Mint 15 install here, albeit with a /home directory from a former LMDE install. After replacing the file from post #38, categories get highlighted, but no applications show. Search field does not work: I can type, but nothing is found, categories only fade out. After I renamed all directories ~/.gnome* to ~/.gnome*.bak, some more categories did show. Output of cinnamon --replace 21 | tee log_cinnamon.txt attached. ** Attachment added: cinnamon --replace 21 | tee log_cinnamon.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1081842/+attachment/3703587/+files/log_cinnamon.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081842 Title: [cinnamon] Cinnamon Menu not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1081842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485949] Re: TeX/LaTeX/pdfLaTeX binaries not working over CIFS/SAMBA shares
Post №6 solved the problem for me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485949 Title: TeX/LaTeX/pdfLaTeX binaries not working over CIFS/SAMBA shares To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/485949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886048] Re: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 886048] Re: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681535] Re: Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/md0 failed.
does not work for me in either lucid or onoeric. No GPT here and only 8GB (virtual, test) harddrives. Please reopen! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681535 Title: Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/md0 failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/681535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886048] Re: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
sure, here it is! Thank you for your attention. ** Attachment added: checkpw.sh https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+attachment/2655076/+files/checkpw.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 886048] Re: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
sure, here it is! Thank you for your attention. ** Attachment added: checkpw.sh https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+attachment/2655076/+files/checkpw.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886048] [NEW] “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
Public bug reported: the purpose of my “check password script” is, amongst others, to check if a new password contains relevant portions of the username. Therefore, it is called like this from smb.conf: check password script = /usr/local/sbin/checkpw.sh %U I did expect it to pass the username to the script. But most of the times, the script receives not the username, but the computer account name of the specific user, or even nothing at all. I verified this by logging what the script gets: username=$1 log user $username initiated password change and this is the result: /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:07:57 hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:35:53 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:37:35 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:56:49 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:56:49 server hostname checkpasswd: ERR complexity score not met (2/3) /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:57:51 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:58:30 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:23:49 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:24:44 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:24:44 server hostname checkpasswd: ERR complexity score not met (2/3) /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:26:01 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 886048] [NEW] “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters
Public bug reported: the purpose of my “check password script” is, amongst others, to check if a new password contains relevant portions of the username. Therefore, it is called like this from smb.conf: check password script = /usr/local/sbin/checkpw.sh %U I did expect it to pass the username to the script. But most of the times, the script receives not the username, but the computer account name of the specific user, or even nothing at all. I verified this by logging what the script gets: username=$1 log user $username initiated password change and this is the result: /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:07:57 hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:35:53 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:37:35 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:56:49 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:56:49 server hostname checkpasswd: ERR complexity score not met (2/3) /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:57:51 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 08:58:30 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:23:49 server hostname checkpasswd: user empty initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:24:44 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:24:44 server hostname checkpasswd: ERR complexity score not met (2/3) /var/log/syslog:Nov 4 09:26:01 server hostname checkpasswd: user client hostname initiated password change ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886048 Title: “check password script” option does not reliably pass parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/886048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354793] Re: date returns invalid date for some timezone's DST
It is still not working as expected with Lucid. And it's breaking a script of mine, sending every instance to an endless, CPU eating loop… -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354793 Title: date returns invalid date for some timezone's DST To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/354793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844774] [NEW] Samba ignores “check password script” option
Public bug reported: from the smb.conf man page: check password script (G) The name of a program that can be used to check password complexity. The password is sent to the program's standard input. The program must return 0 on a good password, or any other value if the password is bad. In case the password is considered weak (the program does not return 0) the user will be notified and the password change will fail. Problem: The script does not get executed. Whatever is configured here, the script is not being touched and so the option is useless. The execution of this script should be logged with log level 5 but it isn't. It also does not give an error if the script cannot be found. Testparm warns, however, if you misspell the check password option. This has been working two months ago when I was testing it, but now that the password policy must be enforced it is not. Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release:10.04 samba: Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 Version table: *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844774 Title: Samba ignores “check password script” option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/844774/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 844774] Re: Samba ignores “check password script” option
Sorry! The option has to be set on the server where the password actually will be changed! I was testing this on a server with a slave LDAP directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844774 Title: Samba ignores “check password script” option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/844774/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 844774] [NEW] Samba ignores “check password script” option
Public bug reported: from the smb.conf man page: check password script (G) The name of a program that can be used to check password complexity. The password is sent to the program's standard input. The program must return 0 on a good password, or any other value if the password is bad. In case the password is considered weak (the program does not return 0) the user will be notified and the password change will fail. Problem: The script does not get executed. Whatever is configured here, the script is not being touched and so the option is useless. The execution of this script should be logged with log level 5 but it isn't. It also does not give an error if the script cannot be found. Testparm warns, however, if you misspell the check password option. This has been working two months ago when I was testing it, but now that the password policy must be enforced it is not. Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release:10.04 samba: Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 Version table: *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844774 Title: Samba ignores “check password script” option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/844774/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844774] Re: Samba ignores “check password script” option
Sorry! The option has to be set on the server where the password actually will be changed! I was testing this on a server with a slave LDAP directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844774 Title: Samba ignores “check password script” option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/844774/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605454] Re: Lucid Preseed: GRUB location disregarded
Hm! Seems I was using an old, pre-release version of server iso. It seems to work fine with a newly-downloaded version. ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Lucid Preseed: GRUB location disregarded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605454] [NEW] Lucid Preseed: GRUB location disregarded
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer I created a CD for automatic installation of Lucid servers using the preseed template file from https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/installation- guide/example-preseed.txt. Now I need to have a high-capacity installation source. “No big deal”, I thought, “I'll just create a bootable USB drive and install from there”. Unfortunately, it seems that the installer does not honor my GRUB location configuration at all. My USB drive becomes /dev/sda during the installation and this is where GRUB gets installed, regardless what I configure. The installer installs GRUB on my USB drive, not on my internal hard drive. I tried several configuration options: d-i grub-installer/bootdev string (hd1,0) d-i grub-installer/bootdev string (hd0,0) (hd1,0) d-i grub-installer/bootdev string /dev/sdb (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433875) d-i grub-installer/bootdev string /dev/sda /dev/sdb but they all do not work, leaving my server unbootable from hard drive. If I boot the server from my USB installation medium, however, my server system loads like it should. Any assistance is highly appreciated because I'll soon need to rollout servers in very remote places without stable internet connection. I can deliver more information when I know what is useful. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid Preseed: GRUB location disregarded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583362] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package
** Description changed: I downloaded the DVD iso file from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/dvd/current/ and tried to install it. The installation failed like this: Debbootstrap warning. Warning: file:///cdrom/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb was corrupt and then some consecutive errors. I double-checked the md5sums and they are fine! So I guess the official ISO includes a corrupt file. I also did the automatic check that is - offered in the boot menu and it reported two errors (but not which). + offered in the boot menu and it reported two errors (unfortunately it + did not say what errors). - - I finally downloaded the package with the same name from (some legitimate website, I guess it must have been) http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/zlib1g. The package version has a different md5sum and the installation seems to work so far. + I finally downloaded the package with the same name from (some + legitimate website, I guess it must have been) + http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/zlib1g. The package version has a + different md5sum and the installation seems to work so far. More information: $ md5sum * bfe282ca7fe53dcc853d7020ca42607f zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64-corrupt.deb 9740b47b7014b26c56d8f4b1719963f0 zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb $ file * zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64-corrupt.deb: data zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb: Debian binary package (format 2.0) -- Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583362] [NEW] Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package
Public bug reported: I downloaded the DVD iso file from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/dvd/current/ and tried to install it. The installation failed like this: Debbootstrap warning. Warning: file:///cdrom/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb was corrupt and then some consecutive errors. I double-checked the md5sums and they are fine! So I guess the official ISO includes a corrupt file. I also did the automatic check that is offered in the boot menu and it reported two errors (but not which). I finally downloaded the package with the same name from (some legitimate website, I guess it must have been) http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/zlib1g. The package version has a different md5sum and the installation seems to work so far. More information: $ md5sum * bfe282ca7fe53dcc853d7020ca42607f zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64-corrupt.deb 9740b47b7014b26c56d8f4b1719963f0 zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb $ file * zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64-corrupt.deb: data zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64.deb: Debian binary package (format 2.0) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583362] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package
** Attachment added: package from the official DVD iso http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48818022/zlib1g_1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1_amd64-corrupt.deb -- Ubuntu 10.04 DVD: install fails due to corrupt zlib1g package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] [NEW] update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report th is bug”.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I am unsure what this may be. Seems a common error during upgrade, bug reports about this are often marked as “invalid” by the maintainers. I'll file this report either way because the software asks me for it. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265108/apt.log -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265125/apt.log ** Attachment removed: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265108/apt.log -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: apt-term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265148/apt-term.log -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265152/lspci.txt -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: system_state.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265178/system_state.tar.gz -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265171/main.log -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578724] Re: update-manager reports “s ome updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug ”.
** Attachment added: term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48265200/term.log -- update-manager reports “some updates could not be installed… your system is in an unusuable state… please report this bug”. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
Does setting preserve case=no solve your issues ? No, as “touch test.test ; touch TEST.test” still creates two separate files. Anyhow, “touch file.test ; ls FILE.test” (correctly) returns FILE.test? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
–– more importantly, with “preserve case = no” it is seems to be impossible to create mixed-case file names; but only from Windows, LINUX does allow this…? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
My conclusion for now: Does setting preserve case=no solve your issues ? YES, BUT it creates a new critical issue. With this option, it is no longer possible to create files with the case that the file passes (see smb.conf). They are forced to be the default case (lower). -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
hm… might “short preserve case = no” be the key? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: samba In my setup using samba's “case sensitive = no” option it is not possible for Windows machines to create files with the same filename but different cases. Example: “file.test” can not reside next to “FILE.test”. However, when a LINUX client (Gentoo) connects to the SAMBA share, it is allowed to create such files, ignoring SAMBA's case sensitivity option. When the same LINUX client connects to a Windows share the behaviour is correct. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy samba samba: - Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 - Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 - Version table: - 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 - 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages - *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status - + Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 + Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 + Version table: + 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 + 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages + *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status mount options (output of mount command): //samba-machine/share on mount point type cifs (rw,mand,relatime,unc=\\samba-machine\share,username=username,domain=domain,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip address,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nocase,rsize=16384,wsize=57344) global section in smb.conf: [global] - log level = 2 - netbios name = netbios name - workgroup = workgroup - wins server = wins server - map to guest = Bad User - encrypt passwords = true - domain master = no - local master = yes - domain logons = yes - os level = 63 - passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ - obey pam restrictions = no - security = user - ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn - ldap ssl = no - ldap delete dn= yes - ldap group suffix = ou=Groups - ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers - ldap user suffix = ou=Users - ldap suffix = ldap suffix - winbind nested groups = no - winbind trusted domains only = yes - case sensitive = no + log level = 2 + netbios name = netbios name + workgroup = workgroup + wins server = wins server + map to guest = Bad User + encrypt passwords = true + domain master = no + local master = yes + domain logons = yes + os level = 63 + passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ + obey pam restrictions = no + security = user + ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn + ldap ssl = no + ldap delete dn= yes + ldap group suffix = ou=Groups + ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers + ldap user suffix = ou=Users + ldap suffix = ldap suffix + winbind nested groups = no + winbind trusted domains only = yes + case sensitive = no share section in smb.conf: [share name$] - path = path - browseable = no - writeable = yes - inherit acls = yes - inherit permissions = yes - create mask = 775 - directory mask = 775 - write list = write list - nt acl support = no - vfs objects = recycle - recycle: repository = __Trash - recycle: keeptree = Yes - recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb - recycle: exclude_dir = tmp - recycle:versions = Yes + path = path + browseable = no + writeable = yes + inherit acls = yes + inherit permissions = yes + create mask = 775 + directory mask = 775 + write list = write list + nt acl support = no + vfs objects = recycle + recycle: repository = __Trash + recycle: keeptree = Yes + recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb + recycle: exclude_dir = tmp + recycle:versions = Yes explanatory behaviour: # cd /mounts/samba-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test FILE.text file.test # cd /mounts/windows-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test file.test ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 12 09:35:02 2010 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US + SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
Does setting preserve case=no solve your issues ? No, as “touch test.test ; touch TEST.test” still creates two separate files. Anyhow, “touch file.test ; ls FILE.test” (correctly) returns FILE.test? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
–– more importantly, with “preserve case = no” it is seems to be impossible to create mixed-case file names; but only from Windows, LINUX does allow this…? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
My conclusion for now: Does setting preserve case=no solve your issues ? YES, BUT it creates a new critical issue. With this option, it is no longer possible to create files with the case that the file passes (see smb.conf). They are forced to be the default case (lower). -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
hm… might “short preserve case = no” be the key? -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: samba In my setup using samba's “case sensitive = no” option it is not possible for Windows machines to create files with the same filename but different cases. Example: “file.test” can not reside next to “FILE.test”. However, when a LINUX client (Gentoo) connects to the SAMBA share, it is allowed to create such files, ignoring SAMBA's case sensitivity option. When the same LINUX client connects to a Windows share the behaviour is correct. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy samba samba: - Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 - Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 - Version table: - 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 - 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages - *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status - + Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 + Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 + Version table: + 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 + 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages + *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status mount options (output of mount command): //samba-machine/share on mount point type cifs (rw,mand,relatime,unc=\\samba-machine\share,username=username,domain=domain,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip address,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nocase,rsize=16384,wsize=57344) global section in smb.conf: [global] - log level = 2 - netbios name = netbios name - workgroup = workgroup - wins server = wins server - map to guest = Bad User - encrypt passwords = true - domain master = no - local master = yes - domain logons = yes - os level = 63 - passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ - obey pam restrictions = no - security = user - ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn - ldap ssl = no - ldap delete dn= yes - ldap group suffix = ou=Groups - ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers - ldap user suffix = ou=Users - ldap suffix = ldap suffix - winbind nested groups = no - winbind trusted domains only = yes - case sensitive = no + log level = 2 + netbios name = netbios name + workgroup = workgroup + wins server = wins server + map to guest = Bad User + encrypt passwords = true + domain master = no + local master = yes + domain logons = yes + os level = 63 + passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ + obey pam restrictions = no + security = user + ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn + ldap ssl = no + ldap delete dn= yes + ldap group suffix = ou=Groups + ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers + ldap user suffix = ou=Users + ldap suffix = ldap suffix + winbind nested groups = no + winbind trusted domains only = yes + case sensitive = no share section in smb.conf: [share name$] - path = path - browseable = no - writeable = yes - inherit acls = yes - inherit permissions = yes - create mask = 775 - directory mask = 775 - write list = write list - nt acl support = no - vfs objects = recycle - recycle: repository = __Trash - recycle: keeptree = Yes - recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb - recycle: exclude_dir = tmp - recycle:versions = Yes + path = path + browseable = no + writeable = yes + inherit acls = yes + inherit permissions = yes + create mask = 775 + directory mask = 775 + write list = write list + nt acl support = no + vfs objects = recycle + recycle: repository = __Trash + recycle: keeptree = Yes + recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb + recycle: exclude_dir = tmp + recycle:versions = Yes explanatory behaviour: # cd /mounts/samba-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test FILE.text file.test # cd /mounts/windows-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test file.test ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 12 09:35:02 2010 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US + SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] [NEW] case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba In my setup using samba's “case sensitive = no” option it is not possible for Windows machines to create files with the same filename but different cases. Example: “file.test” can not reside next to “FILE.test”. However, when a LINUX client (Gentoo) connects to the SAMBA share, it is allowed to create such files, ignoring SAMBA's case sensitivity option. When the same LINUX client connects to a Windows share the behaviour is correct. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy samba samba: Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Version table: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status mount options (output of mount command): //samba-machine/share on mount point type cifs (rw,mand,relatime,unc=\\samba-machine\share,username=username,domain=domain,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip address,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nocase,rsize=16384,wsize=57344) global section in smb.conf: [global] log level = 2 netbios name = netbios name workgroup = workgroup wins server = wins server map to guest = Bad User encrypt passwords = true domain master = no local master = yes domain logons = yes os level = 63 passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ obey pam restrictions = no security = user ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn ldap ssl = no ldap delete dn= yes ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap suffix = ldap suffix winbind nested groups = no winbind trusted domains only = yes case sensitive = no share section in smb.conf: [share name$] path = path browseable = no writeable = yes inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 write list = write list nt acl support = no vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = __Trash recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes explanatory behaviour: # cd /mounts/samba-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test FILE.text file.test # cd /mounts/windows-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test file.test ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 12 09:35:02 2010 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43896901/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43896902/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
I disagree. The problem is that when, for example, two files “test.test” and “test.TEST” are being addressed they should be treated as the exact same file, as case sensitivity should be off and SAMBA should not care about letter cases. They do when being addressed by a Windows (7) machine, in my setup, but they do not when they are being created by a LINUX client (mount options see above). When they are created by that LINUX machine, SAMBA allows “test.test” and “TEST.test” to be two different, independent files when it should not. I do not think that the client is the issue because when being connected to a Windows share the behaviour is as desired. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561281] [NEW] case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba In my setup using samba's “case sensitive = no” option it is not possible for Windows machines to create files with the same filename but different cases. Example: “file.test” can not reside next to “FILE.test”. However, when a LINUX client (Gentoo) connects to the SAMBA share, it is allowed to create such files, ignoring SAMBA's case sensitivity option. When the same LINUX client connects to a Windows share the behaviour is correct. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy samba samba: Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Version table: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://dz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status mount options (output of mount command): //samba-machine/share on mount point type cifs (rw,mand,relatime,unc=\\samba-machine\share,username=username,domain=domain,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip address,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nocase,rsize=16384,wsize=57344) global section in smb.conf: [global] log level = 2 netbios name = netbios name workgroup = workgroup wins server = wins server map to guest = Bad User encrypt passwords = true domain master = no local master = yes domain logons = yes os level = 63 passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ obey pam restrictions = no security = user ldap admin dn = ldap admin dn ldap ssl = no ldap delete dn= yes ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap suffix = ldap suffix winbind nested groups = no winbind trusted domains only = yes case sensitive = no share section in smb.conf: [share name$] path = path browseable = no writeable = yes inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 write list = write list nt acl support = no vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = __Trash recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes explanatory behaviour: # cd /mounts/samba-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test FILE.text file.test # cd /mounts/windows-share # touch file.test # touch FILE.test # ls *.test file.test ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 12 09:35:02 2010 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43896901/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43896902/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561281] Re: case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored
I disagree. The problem is that when, for example, two files “test.test” and “test.TEST” are being addressed they should be treated as the exact same file, as case sensitivity should be off and SAMBA should not care about letter cases. They do when being addressed by a Windows (7) machine, in my setup, but they do not when they are being created by a LINUX client (mount options see above). When they are created by that LINUX machine, SAMBA allows “test.test” and “TEST.test” to be two different, independent files when it should not. I do not think that the client is the issue because when being connected to a Windows share the behaviour is as desired. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- case sensitivity option (case sensitive=no) is not honored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485949] Re: TeX/LaTeX/pdfLaTeX binaries not working over CIFS/SAMBA shares
Another occurence here. -- TeX/LaTeX/pdfLaTeX binaries not working over CIFS/SAMBA shares https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520750] Re: lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
This is affecting me too, also in an installation on a physical machine. The error does *not* occur when installing without proper network connection (I suspect the error comes from a package updated during installation). But it *does* when dist-upgrading afterwards. -- lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
