[Bug 1232873] Re: "could not back up files" dialog never shown; breaks scheduled backups
Does anyone know of a backup program that works? This one never terminates and doesn't report errors to alog like any, and I mean ANY, sensible, properly programmed program. >From this raised in 2008, and still unaddressed in 2016, 8 YEARS later, it isn't actually maintained either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232873 Title: "could not back up files" dialog never shown; breaks scheduled backups To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1232873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 736743] Re: environment block not implemented on btrfs
Confirmed that this still exists in released Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743 Title: environment block not implemented on btrfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/736743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1005573] Re: Apport should not present the user with non-actionable information
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 997470 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997470 The duplicate status is wrong. bug #997470 is about a bug in apport-gpu-error-intel.py this bug is about a reporting strategy which is inappropriate for any fault in a stable LTS release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005573 Title: Apport should not present the user with non-actionable information To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1005573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849414] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in ply_event_loop_process_pending_events()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 553745 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553745 Same crash in 12.04 LTS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849414 Title: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in ply_event_loop_process_pending_events() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/849414/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 870741] [NEW] No Package Header
Public bug reported: Could not initialise the package information An unresolvable problem occurred while initialising the package information. Please report this bug for the 'update-manager' package and try to include the following error message: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu .com_ubuntu_dists_oneiric_main_binary-amd64_Packages, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.' ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870741 Title: No Package Header To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/870741/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 870741] Re: No Package Header
This is Oneiric Beta 2. Can't see how to tag the bug with that info (bug in launchpad?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870741 Title: No Package Header To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/870741/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700335] Re: No documentation for process kworker
Currently with a fresh install of 11.04 AMD64 I have over 90 instances of kworker running, mostly sleeping. Why? What possible use is this undocumented process? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700335 Title: No documentation for process kworker -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 447123] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in calloc()
I will not be upgrading to natty. I detest Unity. Sorry. R. On 28 April 2011 04:58, bugbot 447...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: This bug report was filed against an old version of Ubuntu. Can you confirm whether this is still an issue in natty? If you don't mind, it would be very helpful if you could update the bug report in launchpad to 'Fix Released' if it is no longer an issue for you, or if it is still occurring under natty, please tag the bug 'natty' so it's easier for us to track. ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug (445706). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447123 Title: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in calloc() To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-180/+bug/447123/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447123 Title: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in calloc() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672657] Re: libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions
It seems that the system allows unofficial software to installed without any warning. How can this be avoided? By just using software that comes from Canonical - if so then Ubuntu is no better than Windows. There surely should be some warning when a package seeks to upgrade an official release to a later version? ** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+question/133280 -- libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672657] Re: libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions
This appears to be the same problem as this one. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+question/132957 -- libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672657] [NEW] libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libqt4-opengl Prevents installing VirtualBox. Maverick AMD-64. Fully up to date. apt-cache policy libqt4-opengl libqt4-opengl: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4 Version table: 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages sudo apt-get install libqt4-opengl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies. libqt4-opengl : Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed Depends: libqtgui4 (= 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libqt4-opengl cannot be installed as it requires earlier versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463122] [NEW] Update-manager crashes immediately
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager After recent updates to Karmic (I was away for a week), Update-manager, apt-get and Synaptic all crash when run: Could not initialise the package information An unresolvable problem occurred while initialising the package information. Please report this bug for the 'update-manager' package and try to include the following error message: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu .com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.' ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Update-manager crashes immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463122] Re: Update-manager crashes immediately
Attached. I confirm that deleting all the *%5fGB files - see list, corrected the behaviour. archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_restricted_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB ** Attachment added: Additional files required. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34590646/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_i18n_Translation-en%255fGB -- Update-manager crashes immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463122] Re: Update-manager crashes immediately
Attached. I confirm that deleting all the *%5fGB files - see list, corrected the behaviour. archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_restricted_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fGB ** Attachment added: Additional files required. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34590687/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_i18n_Translation-en%255fGB -- Update-manager crashes immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 448214] Re: Usplash doesn't reveal the console when manual intervention is needed, thus leading a user to believe that the computer hangs
I have updated to 0.5.42, and now after the white logo the bootstrap hangs for over 1 minute 20 seconds with nothing on the screen at all. This is unacceptable, even for old hands, never mind new users. (AMD Phenom x 4 3Ghz + 4G, i386). -- Usplash doesn't reveal the console when manual intervention is needed, thus leading a user to believe that the computer hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443179] [NEW] package libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-4
Public bug reported: bug after karmic upgrade ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 5 15:00:30 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-49 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic SourcePackage: ffmpeg-extra Title: package libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-49 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ffmpeg-extra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-49 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443179] Re: package libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-49
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33034043/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33034044/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libavutil-extra-49 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavutil.so.49.15.0', which is also in package libavutil-unstripped-49 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443178] [NEW] package libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstrippe
Public bug reported: bug after karmic upgrade ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 5 15:00:31 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstripped-52 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic SourcePackage: ffmpeg-extra Title: package libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstripped-52 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ffmpeg-extra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstripped-52 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443178] Re: package libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstripped-
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33034029/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33034030/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libavcodec-extra-52 4:0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libavcodec.so.52.20.0', which is also in package libavcodec-unstripped-52 3:0.svn20090303-1ubuntu2+unstripped1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360460] Re: Alternate install fails requesting same disc
I have just hit this bug with Karmic Alpha 6 amd64 alt install. My configuration is (I only have one IDE channel): CDROM is Master, HD is Slave. -- Alternate install fails requesting same disc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389562] [NEW] The Images shown by Nautilus are NOT the file contents, reload does not correct this
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus This is similar to #36837, but in Jaunty. I rename a lot of files using a command line script, and then using nautilus. For instance, Slide00089 is renamed Slide00090a, then Slide00090 is deleted and Slide00090a renamed Slide00090. The image thumbnail will not reflect the contents of Slide00090. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.26.2-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- The Images shown by Nautilus are NOT the file contents, reload does not correct this https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389562] Re: The Images shown by Nautilus are NOT the file contents, reload does not correct this
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28118405/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28118406/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28118407/ProcStatus.txt -- The Images shown by Nautilus are NOT the file contents, reload does not correct this https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31640] Re: slamr kernel module not working with kernel 2.6.15
It doesn't work with 7.04's kernel either. In fact Ubuntu doesn't seem to like modems much... Perhaps everyone at Canonical has broadband, and never leaves the office. R. -- slamr kernel module not working with kernel 2.6.15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31640 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94350] J-Pilot still fails in Edgy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jpilot Using Sync since the Edgy update (and with ALL subsequent upgrades applied) still fails with J-Pilot reporting: Syncing on device /dev/ttyS0 Press the HotSync button now dlp_ReadSysInfo error Exiting with status SYNC_ERROR_PI_CONNECT Finished This was reported in bug #68815 in November 2006 but I cannot now find that bug. Note also the comments in Forum: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=286673highlight=SYNC_ERROR_PI_CONNECT ** Affects: jpilot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- J-Pilot still fails in Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/94350 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68815] Re: After Edgy upgrade Jpilot will not sync to serial PalmVx
So no one is working on this? It's well confirmed in the forums. Many people have it. -- After Edgy upgrade Jpilot will not sync to serial PalmVx https://launchpad.net/bugs/68815 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68815] After Edgy upgrade Jpilot will not sync to serial PalmVx
Public bug reported: Syncing on device /dev/ttyS0 Press the HotSync button now dlp_ReadSysInfo error Exiting with status SYNC_ERROR_PI_CONNECT Finished The underlying pilot-link works fine. Evolution sync's fine. ** Affects: jpilot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- After Edgy upgrade Jpilot will not sync to serial PalmVx https://launchpad.net/bugs/68815 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
