[Bug 303665] Re: AAO 3G not detected
My laptop is stolen, so this bug is of no importance to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303665 Title: AAO 3G not detected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780713] Re: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17 build3 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780713 Title: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17 build3 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780713] [NEW] package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17 build3 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.2 Every time after logging in to ubuntu classic ( or unity ) I'm asked to submit a problem about xulrunner. This is it, I have no idea what to do to reproduce it. It just pops up every time. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat May 7 22:15:32 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 SourcePackage: xulrunner-1.9.2 Title: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-07 (3 days ago) ** Affects: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780713 Title: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.17 build3 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753817] Re: [natty] Internal laptop keyboard and touchpad does not work after upgrade
I had this issue as well, after booting an old kernel and running apt- get update/upgrade everything worked again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753817 Title: [natty] Internal laptop keyboard and touchpad does not work after upgrade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.32-16
After an update a few days ago, it works again. I didn't make any changes to settings, just did some updates once in a while. Bug can be closed. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.32-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
Two years later, this bug is still not fixed. I just updated to lucid with no improvements. Why is no-one looking at the changes between: 2.6.24-5 and 2.6.24-7 ? That's the moment when the error was 'implemented' in ubuntu. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Summary changed: - Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 + Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.32-16 -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.32-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496371] Re: Laptop Trackpad Issue
I have the same problem. 'hide mouse on typing' wasn't even on. I have a Toshiba Satellite. I updated to the latest lucid just yet. Let me know if more info is needed. -- Laptop Trackpad Issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
Really, when is someone going to fix this? How hard can it be to check the differences between 2.6.24-5 and 2.6.24-7 and roll back the changes made for the soundcard I have? I'm not a kernel or alsa hacker so I have no idea where to start. Is there someone I should contact directly to fix this? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Audio Development Team (ubuntu-audio-dev) -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
An update on this issue. I just did a fresh install with the 9.04 beta. Sound is still not working. I still hear some 'krrrt tick tick' stuff. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321646] Re: touchpad button acts strange
I think I have the same problem. Also running Jaunty. I can add a different thing: If I select text (for example in a terminal) and I replace my finger on the touchpad while holding the left button down (which means I want to keep selecting text) it'll paste the already selected text at the current cursor location. The selection is gone. So I guess it ends the selection if I remove my finger from the touchpad. But it also pastes immediately because I still have the left mousebutton down. -- touchpad button acts strange https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
What i forgot to mention: The sound on my external soundcard works excellent. The description of the noise and such is about the internal card. I can switch easily between both cards. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
uname -a: Linux pruim 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 10 03:55:24 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Sound still not working. Just watched a YouTube video with my external soundcard. Then I sent the sound with pulseaudio to my built in card. Looks like there is some progress tho, during silent parts I hear a small bit of noise. When someone talks in a video I hear more noise and a bit of the person talking. very unclear though. Earlier it was just 'tick krrgt tick'. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262736] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.27-1
** Tags added: linux-2.6.27 -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.27-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
Okay, I updated my Intrepid, sound is still not working with 2.6.27-1. It didn't work with 2.6.26 either. This is the follow-up bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/262736 Thank you very much! -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262736] [NEW] Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.27-1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic This is a follow-up on bug 209047 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/209047 ) I updated my intrepid with the latest 2.6.27 kernel. Sound is still not working. Booting to 2.6.24-5 still gives me sound. This issue does also appear in 2.6.26. For information about my soundcard I kindly forward you to my old bugreport: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/209047 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.27-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
OK, I updated to Intrepid. I'm currently at kernel: 2.6.26-2. Still no sound. Can someone please pick this up? Thanks -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux pruim 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 13:23:42 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/alsa-utils reset [sudo] password for tijmen: * Resetting ALSA... [ OK ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ So that seems OK. Still no sound tho. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16
And about the 'fix'. There has never been a bug in their buglist. Just someone who said: 'I fixed it'. But I haven't had any results yet. And no one seems to know if this fix is in ubuntu already. I checked the changelog already, couldn't find anything. -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12
I have kernel version 2.6.24-16 now. Still no sound. If I boot to the -5 version I'm still able to enjoy music. ** Summary changed: - Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12 + Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12
Greg, Someone from the #alsa IRC channel helped me during kernel version -12. He said he made a change which was supposed to fix my problem. Yesterday, I was unable to find the bug in the bugtracker upstream. I still have no sound. Thanks for replying :-) -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182284] Re: no direct rendering after upgrade to hardy
I just updated to the latest kernel, modules and other packages. So I'm at 2.6.24-14-generic now. Still no DRI. Is the fix for EXA performance issue not added to the packages yet? Thanks -- no direct rendering after upgrade to hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12
Hi, Still not fixed in 2.6.24-14-generic. new ./alsa-info.sh output: http://pastebin.ca/969740 -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] Re: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12
This seems to be fixed upstream. I hope thix fix can be added to linux- ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 -- Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209047] [NEW] Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12
Public bug reported: Sound did work in 2.6.24-5 but not in 2.6.24-7 till 2.6.24-12. I don't have any newer kernels yet. I can still boot the -5 kernel, then sound is working. When booting to the other kernels, I hear some clicks out of my speakers or headphone. The speaker-test application isn't playing any sound in -7 till -12. The output from ./alsa-info.sh is on http://pastebin.ca/962832 Or below: !! !!ALSA Information Script v 0.4.41 !! !!Script ran on: Sun Mar 30 03:17:13 CEST 2008 !!Linux Distribution !!-- Ubuntu hardy (development branch) \n \l DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu hardy (development branch)" !!Kernel Information !!-- Kernel release:2.6.24-12-generic Operating System: GNU/Linux Architecture: i686 Processor: unknown SMP Enabled: Yes !!ALSA Version !! Driver version: 1.0.16 Library version: Utilities version: 1.0.15 !!Loaded ALSA modules !!--- snd_hda_intel !!Soundcards recognised by ALSA !!- 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel HDA Intel at 0xff63c000 irq 22 !!PCI Soundcards installed in the system !!-- 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 02) !!Advanced information - PCI Vendor/Device/Susbsystem ID's !! 00:1b.0 0403: 8086:27d8 (rev 02) Subsystem: 1179:ff40 !!Modprobe options (Sound related) !! snd-atiixp-modem: index=-2 snd-intel8x0m: index=-2 snd-via82xx-modem: index=-2 snd-usb-audio: index=-2 snd-usb-usx2y: index=-2 snd-usb-caiaq: index=-2 snd-cmipci: mpu_port=0x330 fm_port=0x388 !!Loaded sound module options !!-- !!Module: snd_hda_intel enable : Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y enable_msi : 0 id : ,,, index : -1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1 model : ,,, position_fix : 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 power_save : 0 power_save_controller : Y probe_mask : -1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1 single_cmd : N !!HDA-Intel Codec information !!--- --startcollapse-- Codec: Analog Devices AD1986A Address: 0 Vendor Id: 0x11d41986 Subsystem Id: 0x1179ff40 Revision Id: 0x100500 No Modem Function Group found Default PCM: rates [0x7f]: 8000 11025 16000 22050 32000 44100 48000 bits [0xe]: 16 20 24 formats [0x1]: PCM Default Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00, nsteps=0x00, stepsize=0x00, mute=1 Default Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x1f, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=1 GPIO: io=0, o=1, i=0, unsolicited=0, wake=0 Node 0x02 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x30311: Stereo Digital Converter: stream=6, channel=0 Digital: Digital category: 0x0 PCM: rates [0x60]: 44100 48000 bits [0x2]: 16 formats [0x5]: PCM AC3 Delay: 3 samples Connection: 2 0x01* 0x06 Node 0x03 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x44d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x17, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x11 0x11] Converter: stream=0, channel=0 Power: setting=D0, actual=D0 Processing caps: benign=1, ncoeff=70 Node 0x04 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x40d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x17, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Converter: stream=4, channel=0 Power: setting=D0, actual=D0 Node 0x05 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x40d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x17, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Converter: stream=0, channel=0 Power: setting=D0, actual=D0 Node 0x06 [Audio Input] wcaps 0x100511: Stereo Converter: stream=1, channel=4 PCM: rates [0x7f]: 8000 11025 16000 22050 32000 44100 48000 bits [0x6]: 16 20 formats [0x1]: PCM Power: setting=D0, actual=D0 Connection: 1 0x12 Node 0x07 [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x200101: Stereo Connection: 8 0x03 0x09 0x13 0x14 0x15 0x16 0x17 0x18 Node 0x08 [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x200100: Mono Connection: 1 0x07 Node 0x09 [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010e: Mono Amp-In Amp-Out Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00, nsteps=0x00, stepsize=0x00, mute=1 Amp-In vals: [0x80] [0x80] Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00, nsteps=0x00, stepsize=0x00, mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80] Connection: 2 0x04 0x05 Node 0x0a [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300101: Stereo Connection: 3 0x07* 0x04 0x05 Node 0x0b [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300101: Stereo Connection: 2 0x07* 0x04 Node 0x0c [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300101: Stereo Connection: 2 0x04* 0x07 Node 0x0d [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300101: Stereo Connection: 2 0x05* 0x08 Node 0x0e [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300100: Mono Connection: 2 0x08* 0x11 Node 0x0f [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x30010d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00, nsteps=0x03, stepsize=0x27, mute=0 Amp-Out vals: [0x00 0x00] Connection: 8 0x1f* 0x20 0x1d 0x1d 0x27 0x28 0x29 0x2a Node 0x10 [Audio Selector] wcaps 0x300101: Stereo Connection:
[Bug 183845] Re: No Compiz after suspend or hybernate
Forgot to check into this bug, my apologies. Anyway, I just tried a suspend (with the latest updates). Then after relogin compiz was still running. So that's good. This was the first time I tried the suspend again since this report. No idea when this problem was actually fixed. -- No Compiz after suspend or hybernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189766] Re: Epiphany: "I'll be careful, I Promise!" button does not work in about:config
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11804940/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11804941/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11804942/ProcStatus.txt -- Epiphany: "I'll be careful, I Promise!" button does not work in about:config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189766] [NEW] Epiphany: "I'll be careful, I Promise!" button does not work in about:config
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: epiphany-browser I have epiphany version 2.21.90. When going to about:config there is this warning: "Be careful, this gun is loaded!" There is a button where I can click on, to confirm that I'm really really sure to change settings in about:config. However, clicking the button doesn't do anything. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Feb 6 23:55:08 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/epiphany-gecko NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: epiphany-gecko 2.21.90-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: epiphany-browser ProcCwd: /home/tijmen ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: epiphany-browser Uname: Linux pruim 2.6.24-5-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 24 19:45:21 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Epiphany: "I'll be careful, I Promise!" button does not work in about:config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183845] No Compiz after suspend or hybernate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz After coming back from hibernate or suspend (works fine all the time), compiz is not running anymore (there is nothing in ps aux / top). While it was on before I went to hibernate. Looks like it's not even trying to startup Compiz after relogin. I can just run compiz --replace and I have my compiz back :-). ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No Compiz after suspend or hybernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182284] no direct rendering after upgrade to hardy
Public bug reported: After an upgrade from gutsy to hardy, i didn't have any direct rendering anymore, scrolling in webpages was slow and such. The weird thing is that glxinfo shows: direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) but, sudo glxinfo shows: direct rendering: Yes unsetting LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT didn't do anything. furthermore, the output of id: uid=1000(tijmen) gid=1000(tijmen) groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev),104(scanner),108(lpadmin),110(admin),115(netdev),117(powerdev),1000(tijmen) so, my user is in the video group. The device: crw-rw-rw- 1 root video 226, 0 2008-01-12 11:34 card0 Output of lspci: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) I use the intel driver. If I have this line in my xorg.conf. compiz and scrolling is working better then: Option "AccelMethod" "xaa". Still no DRI though. I think it's just some sort of setting, somewhere. If so, it's still a bug in the updating meganism. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dri hardy -- no direct rendering after upgrade to hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125842] Re: package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I just did another apt-get upgrade. The mythtv wizard didn't show up. I don't think mythtv was part of the upgrade. but i did a partial upgrade just yet. If mythtv is part of an upcoming upgrade here, i will add another comment. On 7/14/07, Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A new version was released just yesterday as well, does the same thing > happen to you again with this version? > > -- > package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to > install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit > status 1 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125842 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125842] Re: package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I was doing apt-get upgrade (at least that's what I think the GUI updater is running underneath). I have gutsy for a month now or so. The installer asked if i wanted to do a partial upgrade, but i just pressed close and then: 'install updates'. The Mythtv installation wizard appeared as well. I think i pressed 'next' three times. Then i received all those errors. -- package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125842] package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mythtv I was just upgrading my gutsy gibbon. Mythtv gave a lot of errors, and i received like 5 crash report thingies. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 10 22:38:21 2007 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: mythtv ** Affects: mythtv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package mythtv-database 0.20.1+fixes13837-0.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
