[Bug 941111] Re: trac.css icon alignment

2012-02-28 Thread Tim Hatch
Upstream 0.11.7 has "center center", which was introduced in
http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/7920

The change isn't in trunk, however.

What browser are you using?  If you can provide that, and a screenshot,
I'd suggest reporting upstream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94

Title:
  trac.css icon alignment

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/trac/+bug/94/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478794] Re: grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives

2010-09-29 Thread Tim Hatch
Hmm.  That system doesn't run Ubuntu anymore, but I can retry the
installer in order to reproduce steps.  From what I recall, grub-probe
is the process that was waiting on io, which would have been the one I
strace'd after seeing it in top (that's why it starts in the middle).  I
don't know anything about the internals of grub2 to know what launches
os-prober, or how to dig through what dpkg-reconfigure is doing behind
the scenes other than digging through the gigantic strace log or
watching top.

I double-checked on the configuration and here's what it is: The array
shows up as /dev/sda, I created a GPT on there, and then used /dev/sda
(NOT /dev/sda1 like I should have) as a physical volume for lvm,
possibly overwriting some of the gpt so parted refuses to display it
now.  Then it goes through lvm... and I mount /dev/mapper/gulliver-
gulliver as ext3.

If you can provide what additional things you want me to check, I can go
through the installation process again.

# lvdisplay 
  --- Logical volume ---
  LV Name/dev/gulliver/gulliver
  VG Namegulliver
  LV UUIDpZhRIZ-toAC-OmOj-eag0-QQjx-cwRb-qfDyfO
  LV Write Accessread/write
  LV Status  available
  # open 1
  LV Size4.09 TiB
  Current LE 1072815
  Segments   1
  Allocation inherit
  Read ahead sectors auto
  - currently set to 256
  Block device   254:0

# vgdisplay   
  --- Volume group ---
  VG Name   gulliver
  System ID 
  Formatlvm2
  Metadata Areas1
  Metadata Sequence No  2
  VG Access read/write
  VG Status resizable
  MAX LV0
  Cur LV1
  Open LV   1
  Max PV0
  Cur PV1
  Act PV1
  VG Size   4.09 TiB
  PE Size   4.00 MiB
  Total PE  1072815
  Alloc PE / Size   1072815 / 4.09 TiB
  Free  PE / Size   0 / 0   
  VG UUID   yXEddB-w4FI-xEY3-Fv9f-HEak-rAGs-xh6Oc7

# pvdisplay
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name   /dev/sda
  VG Name   gulliver
  PV Size   4.09 TiB / not usable 243.00 MiB
  Allocatable   yes (but full)
  PE Size   4.00 MiB
  Total PE  1072815
  Free PE   0
  Allocated PE  1072815
  PV UUID   p1FNRC-f7H6-Iv5v-5zfq-dXnt-MsgJ-AHmqse

-- 
grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 580412] Re: package trac 0.11.7-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-05-14 Thread Tim Hatch
I checked and this appears to be a packaging issue in the debian.  The
original trac tarball doesn't include any reference to that, but
trac_0.11.7-3.diff does around line 1024, and that version fails to
install on a fresh 10.04 system with the same error you described.
0.11.7-1 is unaffected.

The Debian bug 576988 was opened, but they say should have been fixed in
0.11.7-3 (and I double-checked, the ubuntu 0.11.7-3 is the same as the
debian one).  I don't have a Debian machine handy to test whether
0.11.7-3 installs ok on debian.

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
package trac 0.11.7-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578174] Re: trac does not work

2010-05-10 Thread Tim Hatch
That error is happening because you installed Trac 0.11.5 manually (not
using debs).  Note the /usr/local prefix for tracd.  You should remove
/usr/local/bin/tracd, or fully path to the tracd installed by the deb,
so it will use 0.11.7-1 you just upgraded to.

The tracd installed by the deb is /usr/bin/tracd, as listed on
http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/all/trac/filelist

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
trac does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478300] Re: package trac-git 0.0.20090320 -1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Abhängigkeitsp robleme - lasse es unkonfiguriert

2009-12-07 Thread Tim Hatch
Ulf, can you confirm whether you installed Trac manually (i.e. not using
a deb) before the upgrade? I think that's likely the issue.

-- 
package trac-git 0.0.20090320-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
Abhängigkeitsprobleme - lasse es unkonfiguriert
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 259730] Re: UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase

2009-11-09 Thread Tim Hatch
I assume that this is fixed in the Trac 0.11 series, which is now
available in Ubuntu repositories.

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 477637] Re: trac need to be modified to work correctly

2009-11-09 Thread Tim Hatch
** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
trac need to be modified to work correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478302] Re: package trac 0.11.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-11-09 Thread Tim Hatch
>From the logs,

Richte trac ein (0.11.5-2ubuntu1) ...
pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: Not overwriting local files:
   dpkg: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/wiki/default-pages/TracModWSGI no
t found.
pycentral pkginstall: Not overwriting local files:
   dpkg: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/wiki/default-pages/TracModWSGI no
t found.
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von trac (--configure):
 Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

I'm guessing that you upgraded Trac without uninstalling the version
from the Ubuntu repositories.  This breaks automatic upgrades.  Please
confirm whether you did a manual upgrade.

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
package trac 0.11.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478302
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 477637] Re: trac need to be modified to work correctly

2009-11-09 Thread Tim Hatch
If you have a stack trace from running unmodified Trac, you should
reopen the Trac bug #8114.  We're still waiting on a trace in that
issue.  Can you clarify "can't process..." - do you get an obvious error
or do you get a view screen without saved changes?  Can you add
attachments to tickets?

-- 
trac need to be modified to work correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478794] Re: grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives

2009-11-08 Thread Tim Hatch

** Attachment added: "strace.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35390404/strace.log

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35390405/Dependencies.txt

-- 
grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478794] [NEW] grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives

2009-11-08 Thread Tim Hatch
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: grub2

I have a 3ware 9650se with 4x 1.5TB drives RAID 5.  This exposes an
array of approx 4TiB to Linux as /dev/sdd and it takes a VERY long time
during the installer (a fresh install) and upon an update of grub-pc
today, to create the grub config by probing.

/dev/sdd is configured as an lvm pv, which contains a single lv, which
contains a GPT with a single partition of the whole size formatted ext3.

Expected:

If grub is supposed to probe for other OSes, that such probes complete
within a matter of seconds or provide progress reports.  I don't expect
it to scan entire drives, especially drives so large.

Actual:

It scans the entire lvm-gpt-ext3 drive 4KiB at a time, with no progress,
in both the installer and when running dpkg-reconfigure.  I just timed
it and this took 21m33s to complete.

Notes:

The bug as I see it is that it's doing a linear scan at all, out of the
box.  There's obviously only one partition involved here, and it didn't
at least inform me before the bootloader progress bar hung at 50% during
the 9.10 installer.  An strace log is attached.  This scan launches
several instances of grub-probe, and the whole process takes about half
an hour.

Release: 9.10 using alternate installer cd
grub-pc version: 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4 (but occurred with an earlier one as well)

Let me know what other information would be helpful.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Nov  8 14:17:59 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: grub2
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
grub-probe does a linear scan on large drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 469526] Re: cannot add or edit milestones any more

2009-11-02 Thread Tim Hatch
** Also affects: trac via
   http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/7876
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
cannot add or edit milestones any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469526
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 256042] Re: trac v0.10.4-2 doesn't work with PostgreSQL v8.3

2009-11-01 Thread Tim Hatch
** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
trac v0.10.4-2 doesn't work with PostgreSQL v8.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256042
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 469526] Re: cannot add or edit milestones any more

2009-11-01 Thread Tim Hatch
This sounds like http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/7876 which was fixed in
Trac 0.11.3.

** Bug watch added: Edgewall Trac #7876
   http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/7876

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
cannot add or edit milestones any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469526
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403990] Re: No trac.fcgi

2009-07-24 Thread Tim Hatch
I meant /usr/share/doc/trac/README.Debian.gz

-- 
No trac.fcgi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403990] Re: No trac.fcgi

2009-07-24 Thread Tim Hatch
Check out /usr/share/doc/README.Debian.gz for instructions.

Configuring as CGI, WSGI, FCGI


For trac >= 0.11 the *gi scripts have to be generated using the deploy
command:

trac-admin /path/to/env deploy /path/to/www/trac


** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
No trac.fcgi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401486] Re: trac failed on install

2009-07-23 Thread Tim Hatch
The error portion of the log is

Configurando trac (0.11-2) ...
pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files
pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files
dpkg: error al procesar trac (--configure):
 el subproceso post-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 1

It's not overwriting local files which probably means you installed trac
from a deb, then used easy_install to upgrade it, then finally tried to
upgrade when a new deb was provided by Ubuntu.  Can you confirm whether
this is the case?

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
trac failed on install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401486
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 401875] Re: Uploading and Deleting File Attachments

2009-07-23 Thread Tim Hatch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 369792 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369792

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 369792
   trac pre 0.11.4 incompatible with python 2.6

-- 
Uploading and Deleting File Attachments
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 369793] Re: trac pre 0.11.4 incompatible with python 2.6

2009-04-30 Thread Tim Hatch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 369792 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369792

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 369792
   trac pre 0.11.4 incompatible with python 2.6

-- 
trac pre 0.11.4 incompatible with python 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369793
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 263241] Re: launchpad trac requires a change to trac installation!!

2009-01-24 Thread Tim Hatch
Hi, I'm the author of the plugin.  I'll be glad to discuss ways to make
it better, but like Graham I need to know more about what you mean and
specifically why it upsets you.

> launchpad - trac integration seems to be not a good citizen because...

A good citizen of... ubuntu?  If that's the case, is it the lack of a
.deb?

> > 1. it should not require to change a trac installation if launchpad is a 
> > client
> Trac doesn't offer the necessary APIs out of the box (at least at the 
> moment), so the plugin is a necessity. Do you think there's another way to 
> solve the problem that the plugin solves?

Trac does not support the launchpad bugtracker api out of the box (nor
should it, that's the whole reason that the plugin system exists).  It's
not that the xml-rpc plugin alone _can't_ do what we need (with lots of
changes on the lp side), it's that it doesn't do so efficiently (it
would use a lot of bandwidth even when nothing has changed) and
authentication would be a bear to set up in some other way that would
likely be less secure.

> > 2. if it is necessary, adjust the plugin, in this case xml-rpc to have a 
> > generalized solution and not a hack
> I'm not clear on what you mean here.

I think he means the patch to trac core required for the lp bug ticket
field to linkify on 0.10, which is optional.

> > 3. if this is not possible, add a plugin on http://trac-hacks.org
> I think this should be done anyway, but I'd like clarification on your points 
> above before I proceed.

Do you mean for it to be listed in the wiki on t-h?  It's a wiki,
editable by anyone.

-- 
launchpad trac requires a change to trac installation!!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 71713] Re: suggested packages for syntax highlighting

2008-08-20 Thread Tim Hatch
Following up on this, Trac 0.11 is now available in Intrepid and it has
a "recommends" for python-pygments which I believe addresses the core of
this bug, in accordance with the Debian policy manual.

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
suggested packages for syntax highlighting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 259730] Re: UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase

2008-08-20 Thread Tim Hatch
Did you create the database in utf8 mode? See
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/MySqlDb#MySQL

-- 
UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 259730] Re: UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase

2008-08-20 Thread Tim Hatch
Hi,

What version of Trac are you using?  Usually an error like that is
caused by an external tool manually inserting records in the db.  Have
you done such a thing?  Assuming you're using sqlite, can you run:

sqlite3 db/trac.db 'select text from wiki where name="CamelCase";' |
hexdump -C

and check the line starting with 90.  Here's mine from 0.11-dev, with no
strange characters:

0090  68 20 74 68 65 20 61 64  64 69 74 69 6f 6e 61 6c  |h the additional|
00a0  20 72 65 71 75 69 72 65  6d 65 6e 74 20 74 68 61  | requirement tha|

-- 
UnicodeDecodeError on http://trac.lawyer-web.org/wiki/CamelCase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 114930] Re: Python C API version mismatch

2008-06-11 Thread Tim Hatch
Not Trac's bug

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
Python C API version mismatch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114930
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 220617] Re: apache2 (2.2.3-3.2ubuntu2.1) update breaks trac-0.10.4 charset?

2008-04-22 Thread Tim Hatch
Try this:

$ python
>>> import locale
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, 'sv_SE.UTF-8')

If that gives the same error, you need to either run:

sudo locale-gen sv_SE.UTF-8
or
sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales

Please post back whether it's still an issue.

-- 
apache2 (2.2.3-3.2ubuntu2.1) update breaks trac-0.10.4 charset?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 116948] Re: trac crashes on initenv

2008-04-04 Thread Tim Hatch
Not a Trac bug.  From what I've read in bug 108067 psycopg2 was a little
flaky on 64-bit platforms (as your uname reports you're running).

** Also affects: psycopg2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
trac crashes on initenv
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116948
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152129] Re: Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
See http://modpython.org/FAQ/faqw.py?req=show&file=faq02.013.htp for
background

-- 
Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152129] Re: Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
Looks like pysqlite2 pulled in libsqlite3 which is correct.  It appears
that mod_php is using plain old libsqlite.  My guess is that it's an
interaction between these two.

Also, apache2, pysqlite2, and libapache2-mod-php5 all have new versions
since you reported the bug.  Is it still reproducible, or was it perhaps
due to only partially updating the system?

** Changed in: python-pysqlite2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152129] Re: Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
Not a Trac bug.  Either mod_php or pysqlite2 is my bet.

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
Segfault/double-free crash in python-pysqlite2 in apache2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 174589] Re: incorrect string values setting environment

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
Hi, thanks for using Trac.

This is an install (or maybe docs) issue.  Trac requires UTF-8 databases
(that's what those byte sequences are), and those warnings come from
mysql.  If you use sqlite (like it defaults to) there are no issues like
this (so most users won't hit this).  The ones that do haven't read
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/MySqlDb#MySQL in which is stated:

> In order to avoid several issues with unicode and international characters
> throughout Trac (e.g., international characters turning into question marks
> with mysterious "Incorrect string value" errors logged), we strongly advise
> MySQL users to only use databases having the utf8 character set...

I tested on 7.10 and by following the proper CREATE TABLE statement
(from that link) things work fine.  Leaving it at the default (latin1 on
my system), the warnings appear.

-- 
incorrect string values setting environment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 115067] Re: trac package broken - trac-admin not working

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
I forgot to note, the first traceback about trac-admin not working is
because trac/util/__init__.py didn't exist until r2977 which is
post-0.9.4.  It was definitely not running entirely code out of the deb
at that point.

-- 
trac package broken - trac-admin not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 115067] Re: trac package broken - trac-admin not working

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
You still have tracd from 0.9.3 installed.  Completely remove 0.9.3
before installing a new version (or make sure you replace the scripts as
well).

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
trac package broken - trac-admin not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 199306] Re: Trac "500 - Internal Server Error" for Help/Guide

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Hatch
Should be fixed by upstream r6801, which will be included in version
0.10.5

** Changed in: trac (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

-- 
Trac "500 - Internal Server Error" for Help/Guide
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs