[Bug 1815339] Re: Printer stopped printing paper size 4"x6" after update ghostscript to 9.26
Printing to our HP 8620 printer was affected by this and can confirm that it is fixed in 9.26~dfsg+0-0ubuntu0.18.04.7 (on xenial). Thanks for the quick fix! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815339 Title: Printer stopped printing paper size 4"x6" after update ghostscript to 9.26 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gs-gpl/+bug/1815339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1386005] Re: Password not accepted graphical boot for encrypted root system
To add one more data point, I hit the same problem when upgrading from Kubuntu 14.04 to 16.04. Ondrej's workaround is also effective for my setup. In the end, the upgraded system was unusable for other problems as well so I did a fresh install. However, I kept the lvm volume group on luks device as my /home is there as well and I wanted to keep that. After installation from the Kubunut desktop disc (via usb flash drive) and setting up crypttab manually I still had the same problem: Entering the password via the graphical boot ignores the input. Hitting Alt- Cursor right and Alt-Cursor left I get a text screen with the password I entered. It's working in text mode thought. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386005 Title: Password not accepted graphical boot for encrypted root system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1386005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84899] Re: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow
I run into this with Ubuntu lucid frequently when connecting to CentOS systems. I have no local Kerberos configuration. A good fix for me would be to have SSH check if kerberos is locally configured before trying to do Kerberos authentication. However I have no idea how feasible this approach is. There is no file /etc/krb5.conf on my system, neither is the krb5-config package installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84899 Title: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/84899/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 84899] Re: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow
I run into this with Ubuntu lucid frequently when connecting to CentOS systems. I have no local Kerberos configuration. A good fix for me would be to have SSH check if kerberos is locally configured before trying to do Kerberos authentication. However I have no idea how feasible this approach is. There is no file /etc/krb5.conf on my system, neither is the krb5-config package installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84899 Title: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/84899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
I actually applied the fix manually but did not set the fixed package on hold as I had the hope that any update to the grub package in lucid would fix this. Yesterday my system crashed while working with schroot and snapshots and is now unbootable again :-) So I am interested in a fix once again and hope it goes into Lucid. I will try and install the new proposed fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/563895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
Okay, I just installed the version from lucid-proposed: torsten@sharokan:~$ dpkg -l|grep grub ii grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu13 GRand Unified Bootloader, version 2 (common files) ii grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu13 GRand Unified Bootloader, version 2 (PC/BIOS version) I had to run # grub-install /dev/sda to actually update the grub installation (it would be nice if installing the new package would do that automatically, but this is of course a risk wrt. possible regressions). I created a snapshot again and low and behold: I can boot just fine even with existing LVM snapshots. Thanks! I am all for moving this to lucid-updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/563895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446373] Re: The program 'xsane' received an X Window System error.
This seems to be related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699251 I don't think it is fixed, it is only hard to reproduce. We just ran into this with an in-house application that has no relation to xsane. Basically, whenever a throbber is displayed, we get a crash. This happens only on one machine which is distinct by * Using the proprietary nvidia driver * Having XINERAMA enabled (as opposed to the nividia-specific dual-screen support) * Has one screen with the usual orientation and the other rotated by 90° I believe this to be a bug in the Xrender support somewhere (libXrender, Server module, nvidia driver?) It also does only happen sometimes and may be related to reparenting the throbber on another wizard page in our case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446373 Title: The program 'xsane' received an X Window System error. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane/+bug/446373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446373] Re: The program 'xsane' received an X Window System error.
The BadMatch error is returned from the render extension somewhere in this code block: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/render/picture.c?id=b2015a2c01711646bb7ae23d684abee0cd55d4d0#n1096 One reason would be that the mask pixmap is from another screen (no idea) or has the wrong depth (unlikely): http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/render/picture.c?id=b2015a2c01711646bb7ae23d684abee0cd55d4d0#n1136 The other possibility is that *ps-ChangePictureClip() generates the BadMatch, but I have no idea where that call goes: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/render/picture.c?id=b2015a2c01711646bb7ae23d684abee0cd55d4d0#n1148 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446373 Title: The program 'xsane' received an X Window System error. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane/+bug/446373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563895] Re: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
While installation security updates to my lucid system, this made my system unbootable last week. I spent half an hour today to make it bootable again. I booted from supergrubdisk which also failed to detect LVM (it usually did). I ended up using Knoppix and noticed the leftover snapshot (created via schroot) on boot, deleting it. I then tried to chroot into my Lucid system which failed because Knoppix is i386 and my Lucid install is amd64. Rebooting with the Lucid installation medium, I was surprised that the grub installation on my hard drive magically started to work again and booted fine into my Lucid install. I would deem this a really important problem and I am all for fixing it in Lucid given that a patch exists. BTW: The snapshot name created by schroot is quite long, as it contains a UUID. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895 Title: grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/563895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653766] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic 2.6.32-25.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I just installed the proposed (security) updates on my Lucid Lynx system. This resulted in the following error: root@sharokan:~# dpkg --configure -a Setting up linux-image-2.6.32-33-generic (2.6.32-33.71) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-33-generic Not updating initrd symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled (2.6.32-33.70 was configured last, according to dpkg) Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled (2.6.32-33.70 was configured last, according to dpkg) Running postinst hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub. Generating grub.cfg ... /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `vg0-karmic-root'. User postinst hook script [/usr/sbin/update-grub] exited with value 1 dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.32-33-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up grub-pc (1.98-1ubuntu12) ... Generating grub.cfg ... /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `vg0-karmic-root'. dpkg: error processing grub-pc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-2.6.32-33-generic grub-pc I originally installed karmic, upgraded to lucid quite a while ago. Root is on /dev/vg0/karmic-root which is a simple LVM setup. Booted fine so far... root@sharokan:~# grub-probe -t device / /dev/mapper/vg0-karmic--root root@sharokan:~# grub-probe -t abstraction -d /dev/mapper/vg0-karmic--root grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `vg0-karmic-root'. I fear this means that the update made my system unbootable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653766 Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic 2.6.32-25.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/653766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682613] Re: Transition to swig2.0?
A further note about the transition to SWIG 2.0: It turned out that most packages that require SWIG for building have a flawed version check (distributed in autoconf-archive) that considers version 2.0 smaller than 1.3. So while 2.0 should work fine most of the time, it is usually rejected before even trying to build... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682613 Title: Transition to swig2.0? -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72872] Re: Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac
This problem has also bugged me, albeit on Debian. And I spent an hour or two to do it the right way and get UDF (in that case) to ignore the permissions on the filesystem. After playing with mount options to no avail, I finally gave up and became root to get the discs content copied. I think it really sucks to enter an optical disc and be unable to read it because of permission problems. There should be a mount option to ignore permissions for udf and iso9660 and this should be enabled per default in fstab. The thing is: This will probably need kernel changes... -- Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356529] Re: swig 1.3.39 needs packaging
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514060 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514060 ** Also affects: swig1.3 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514060 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- swig 1.3.39 needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
If it was my decision, the answer would be clear: Rename firefox to iceweasel and be done with it. Now. Otherwise, this stupidity will just continue. What if Firefox demands that installation should be prohibited on slow machines so that users don't get a wrong impression about performance? Abort Ubuntu installation automatically? Or change the installation system so that the browser is selected based on CPU and memory? I hope, Ubuntu reconsiders this decision and stays independent of the legal games of Mozillla corporation. While we are at it, we should make the google money for the startup page for iceweasel go to Debian/Ubuntu respectively ;-) -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
