[Bug 1950683] Re: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality
The problem is discussed in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/4698 which in turn is marked as a duplicate of https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3219 The patch mentioned there solves the problem: $ diff /etc/firejail/firefox-common.profile.orig /etc/firejail/firefox-common.profile 49c49 < seccomp !chroot --- > seccomp !chroot,!kcmp Whether that's a good solution security-wise or not I cannot comment on. Upstream recommends to upgrade firejail. ** Bug watch added: github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues #4698 https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/4698 ** Bug watch added: github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues #3219 https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3219 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950683 Title: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firejail/+bug/1950683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1950683] Re: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality
Same problem here with https://maps.google.com. Works in /usr/bin/firefox but not in firejail /usr/bin/firefox. $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal $ apt-cache policy firejail firejail: Installed: 0.9.62-3ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 0.9.62-3ubuntu0.1 $ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 94.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Candidate: 94.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950683 Title: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firejail/+bug/1950683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions
> Then, either do this at the end after the installer has run, or boot into a live CD environment (e.g. Kubuntu) and do: The many steps given there are not really necessary. If you installed without downloading updates the following steps should be easier: 1. The first boot after the installation will not succeed, but give you a busybox shell from initramfs. 1. In that shell give the cryptsetup command as given above. 1. Exit the shell using Ctrl-D. 1. The boot will now complete. 1. Create the /etc/crypttab file. Typically you can just copy it from your previous root file system. 1. Update the system using apt or whatever you use. Unless you do this immediately when the installer image was built there will be updates that recreate the initramfs. The recreated initramfs will contain your new /etc/crypttab. 1. Reboot. 1. It works! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904270 Title: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1904270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions
I have used the "cryptsetup luksOpen` work-around successfully already
years ago.
However, when installing 20.04 with the server installer it does no longer work.
Installation aborts; in the log I found the cause to be
raise ValueError("encryption key or keyfile must be specified")
from
https://github.com/canonical/curtin/blob/45877d0e1f5774dc424f73b0c1c16b65e0353e63/curtin/commands/block_meta.py#L1394
(Note: This is not necessary the commit that was in use when I used the
installer. I just looked at the current master branch to point to the
message I got. I did upload the crash report, but I don't have a link to
my upload.)
Obviously the installer got confused ny the work-around because it
noticed that there is a LUKS container, but it had never gotten any
secret related to it.
Is there more than one Server installer, that could explain the
discrepancy against the instructions above?
I tried the xubuntu-20.04.2.0 and there the work-around still works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904270
Title:
ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1904270/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions
> I tried the xubuntu-20.04.2.0 Sorry, that should have been xubuntu-20.04.2.0 installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904270 Title: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1904270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1745421] Re: [Archive removal] Error in 17.10: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Same problem on 16.04 LTS with HWE kernel. First error is in statement + /sbin/tc filter add dev enp30s0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745421 Title: [Archive removal] Error in 17.10: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wondershaper/+bug/1745421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574278] Re: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text
I wrote: I can confirm [...] the effectiveness of the work-around "GTK_THEME=adwaita abiword". With some more testing I have to qualify that statement a bit: With the adwaita theme the behaviour is clearly improved compared to the default. I have not seen text flickering so far. But the cursor still flickers a bit and sometimes disappears completely until some new text is entered. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574278 Title: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/abiword/+bug/1574278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574278] Re: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text
Using Xubuntu 16.04 with all updates here. I can confirm both the original flickering and the effectiveness of the work-around "GTK_THEME=adwaita abiword". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574278 Title: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/abiword/+bug/1574278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1562097] Re: mbrola crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
I have the same crash whenever mbrola is called in Xenial. (I use it via espeak). Debugging shows that the crash is in an exit handler. In Wily there was no crash. I looked at the source package and to my big surprise the program is delivered as a binary from upstream. (Yes, it is declared a non-free software.) The binary is built in 1999, but it uses the shared C library of 2016. Something just does not fit any longer. (Or it did never fit, but the new libc is stricter in checking.) Because we only have the binary, no debug symbols and no source, there is not much we can do. I'm not sure whether analyzing the machine code and patching would be legal, probably the answer differs from country to country. I'm certainly not willing to try it. The upstream site http://tcts.fpms.ac.be/synthesis/mbrola.html is still online. One could of course try to ask whether anybody could build a binary on a current system. Or even open-source it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1562097 Title: mbrola crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mbrola/+bug/1562097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1545330] Re: [wily][regression] systemtap script compilation broken by new kernels
** Summary changed: - [wily][regression] completely broken by new kernels + [wily][regression] systemtap script compilation broken by new kernels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545330 Title: [wily][regression] systemtap script compilation broken by new kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1545330/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1429185] Re: Restart button in Additional Drivers does not restart Xubuntu
Still the same problem on a fully updated xubuntu wily $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 15.10 Release:15.10 Codename: wily -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429185 Title: Restart button in Additional Drivers does not restart Xubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1429185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140017] Re: tracker doesn't follow symlinks
Old issue, but my favorite search engine seems to find this report more easily than this upstreaam report https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726264 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #726264 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726264 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140017 Title: tracker doesn't follow symlinks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tracker/+bug/140017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else
Now I came up with an idea how to investigate whether it is a deadlock between mkfs and the GUI. Under /proc//stack one can see the call stack in the kernel space of the process. So if the mkfs process hung in some do_write call and the log capturing process in some do_read call that would confirm my theory of a deadlock. Or the stacks might reveal something else. So I tried the installation once more (actually twice), but according to Murphy both attempts went through the formatting without hanging. Yesterday I had nearly 10 attempts, which hung until I found the work- around. Or my work-around was just random luck... Anyway if anybody gets the problem again she or he might report the stacks of mkfs and the log reading process (don't recall the exact name, saw it yesterday) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447600 Title: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1447600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else
I wrote: Obviously the installer cannot do very much if mkfs.ext4 never completes. And I intended to write: So the bug must be in e2fsprogs (or even in the kernel) However, thinking one more time I don't think either of those statements is necessarily true. The output of mkfs is somehow redirected to the installer GUI (ncurses in my case). So I guess this redirection could cause a deadlock, such that mkfs waits forever to write some output to the installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447600 Title: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1447600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else
I cross-checked that the problem does not occur with ubuntu-14.04 -server-amd64.iso (same VM, excactly same virtual disk) I also found a work-around: 1. When mkfs hangs open a console on virtual console 2 2. Use "ps" to see how mkfs was called exactly and what's the pid 3. kill -9 4. call the same mkfs command manually (I used the -v option) 5. Go back to the installer. It will complain that formatting the filesystem has failed. Just continue (It appears to me that the installer formatted the same filesystem once more after the error. The 2nd attempt (or 3rd if counting the manual one) just worked. I did not debug the details, because it would require one or even several more installations. I was glad it finally worked for me after several hours) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447600 Title: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1447600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else
I get also bitten by this problem when trying to install ubuntu-15.04 -server-amd64.iso in a virtual machine. If I select LVM the installation hangs when it tries to format /boot as ext2 If I select full disk without LVM the installation hangs when it tries to format / (rootfs) as ext4 I can change to a busy box shell in virtual console 2. Command apport- collect is not in the path. I checked dmesg but did not see anything bad. Looking at the output of "ps" shows that the mkfs.ext4 is hanging (status sleeping). Obviously the installer cannot do very much if mkfs.ext4 never completes. strace does not seem to be available in this environment, so I am a bit out of ideas how to debug where the mkfs.ext4 hangs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447600 Title: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1447600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel
After applying 7 patches I got it built and lttng seems to work at least for some basic tests. My build area is a complete mess, because of course the final 7 patches were not the first ones I tried. Hope I will soon have time to clean it up and post the correct patches here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265720 Title: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1265720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel
Above mentioned patch is not enough. More build errors after this. Looks like they might have been addressed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717165 but they are based on a newer ltt version. I will look into when I have time, no promises... ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #717165 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717165 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265720 Title: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1265720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1222021] Re: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events
Hmm, downgraded xfce-power-manager to the previously installed version, didn't help. Same exercise for gnome-settings-manager (which updated at the same time), did not help. Well, because downgrading did not help, I upgraded both of them to the current version again. Result: everything works fine. No clue what was going on there. Sorry about the noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222021 Title: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1222021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1222021] Re: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events
After installing update xfce4-power-manager (1.2.0-2ubuntu1.1) my screen brightness control is broken. (Well, I installed several updates, but this one seems to be the most likely culprit to me). I'll try to downgrade the package again to verify my suspicion. Right now I'm running on battery, so I don't want to try it immediately. If turns out to be a regression, do you prefer to handle it here in the same report or in a new one? (Yes, I am aware of apport-collect) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222021 Title: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1222021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel
It appears that the problem has already been fixed once in http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- saucy.git;a=commit;h=984a2d4fe44738ee6fa69d54d418429b52fea991 But maybe the package lttng-modules-dkms is not build from that source? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265720 Title: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1265720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521533] Re: Okular stores form data in a different directory (possible leak of private data)
** Summary changed: - Bad data handling -> Security Hole + Okular stores form data in a different directory (possible leak of private data) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521533 Title: Okular stores form data in a different directory (possible leak of private data) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdegraphics/+bug/521533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521533] Re: Bad data handling -> Security Hole
** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #267350 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350 ** Also affects: kdegraphics via https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdegraphics in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521533 Title: Bad data handling -> Security Hole To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdegraphics/+bug/521533/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020196] Re: Flash videos in browser play at several times normal speed
Hmm, fix commited, but what version? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020196 Title: Flash videos in browser play at several times normal speed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1020196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1026858] Re: flashplugin-installer can't find adobe-flashplugin_11.2.202.233.orig.tar.gz
This happens typically if your package index files are not up to date. I have the feeling that flashplugin-installer is particular sensitive to this issue, maybe because the code is dowloaded from a different site or just because it used to be updated more often than many other packages. Can you reproduce this after running "sudo apt-get update"? P.S. Why did you want to do a reinstall? Did flash just stop working for you? I was bitten by this problem several times recently, that's why I'm browsing here. I used remove & install, not sure whether --reinstall is equivalent. But we should handle this in a separate report, several issues in the same report are bad practice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026858 Title: flashplugin-installer can't find adobe- flashplugin_11.2.202.233.orig.tar.gz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1026858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738964] Re: update-manager crashed with NotAuthorizedError in _run(): org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.Error.NotAuthorized: ('system-bus-name', {'name': ':1.57'}): org.debian.apt.upgrade-packages
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 704667 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704667
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 704667
Update-manager crashes on fresh natty installs-- NotAuthorizedError:
org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.Error.NotAuthorized: ('system-bus-name', {'name':
':1.107'}): org.debian.apt.upgrade-packages
* You can subscribe to bug 704667 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/704667/+subscribe
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738964
Title:
update-manager crashed with NotAuthorizedError in _run():
org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.Error.NotAuthorized: ('system-bus-name',
{'name': ':1.57'}): org.debian.apt.upgrade-packages
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel
The second problem error: 'CLONE_STOPPED’ undeclared here (not in a function) is fixed by upstream commit b30b7ed1. All my tests are successful for the moment (that doesn't tell much, I have used only very simple scripts) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel
Commit 75a48ca3 mentioned in the upstream bug report applies cleanly to the systemtap source in natty and solves the problem with error: ‘param_ops_int64_t’ undeclared here (not in a function) I tried 2 simple system tap scripts: 1 succeeded and 1 failed. The new error is: error: 'CLONE_STOPPED’ undeclared here (not in a function) Upstream there is a changelog entry > Wed Jan 19 2011 Frank Ch. Eigler > - 1.4-3 - adapt to kernel CLONE_STOPPED deprecation Haven't had time to look into that yet. But from the changelog text I guess it's the same problem again. The systemtap version in natty is just too old to work with the natty kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel
Because systemtap package does not declare the dependecy on the kernel debug info correctly, obviously apport-bug has not included the relevant info either. But yes I have correct kernel debug info installed: ii linux-image-2.6.38-4-generic-dbgsym 2.6.38-4.31 Linux kernel debug image for version 2.6.38 on x86/x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721771] [NEW] natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: systemtap Systemtap module compilation fails with error: ‘param_ops_int64_t’ undeclared here (not in a function) This has been reported and also fixed upstream: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11940 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: systemtap 1.3-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-4.31-generic 2.6.38-rc5 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-4-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Feb 19 15:21:32 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha i386 (20110218) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: systemtap ** Affects: systemtap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594966] Re: [Kubuntu Lucid] Very noisy playback of AAC streams in FLV container
Problem still exists even after the KDE upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691068 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594966 Title: [Kubuntu Lucid] Very noisy playback of AAC streams in FLV container -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification
Short answer: no experience with Maverick 10.10 (long explanation: I stick to LTS for most work. I do have a 1 Kubuntu 10.10 installation but it is very instable (probably because of some nouveau display driver issue) so I have not used it very much and not paid attention to kpackagekit's operation) On Lucid 10.04 LTS I have seen the problem again this week. (Don't remember with which package), But if you say that the implementation has changed significantly, it's probably the best close this report as "won't fix" or something like that (don't remember Launchpad states now). This is not a problem that would justify a SRU. And should the new implementation still suffer from the same problem, we can always report a new bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284 Title: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Now I've built both radeon_dri.so and r200_dri.so for the benfit of those who are not so familiar with git and building. (or those who just want to save the time to do it) 1. Extract the attached file. tar xf mesafix-6936fb.tbz 2, go to the newly created directory cd mesafix-6936fb 3. run OpenGL applications like this LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. glxgears LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. stellarium If it does not work make sure that the applications really use the fixed libraries and not the previously installed ones 1. Find the process id of the application ps -e 2. display the libraries used grep xp /proc/1234/maps (replace 1234 by the process id you got in step 1) 3. Make sure the dri library comes from your newly created directory instead of /usr/lib/dri Elias: could you please test on your laptop to see whether the r200 fix also helps for the radeon driver used for your graphics adapter. ** Attachment added: "radeon_dri and r200_dri from git commit 6936fb" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/656100/+attachment/1696916/+files/mesafix-6936fb.tbz -- [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
To clarify: I have only built and tested r200_dri.so on 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] (rev 02) The comment says that the fix is for r200. No idea whether it helps also for the different card & driver mentioned in #45 -- [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Excellent!!! After git checkout 6936fb and building and starting applications as in comment #42 the problem is gone. Tested with running stellarium and resizing glxgears. -- [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
The problem also affects this card ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] which uses /usr/lib/dri/radeon_dri.so -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
As already mentioned in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29367#c5 the patch in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21374#c5 does not apply to current mesa. I searched a bit in the git history and it applies cleanly e. g. to commit 57f55a. However, this commit is 150 commits apart from today (and that is only counting files named r200 and radeon_common, there might be others less obvious ones) So I assume that that old patch is the wrong approach for us today. So let's start from a different angle. The assertion does not occur on Maverick. Maverick seems to based on Mesa 7.7.1 (according to the source naming, I haven't checked the contents). And 7.7.1 is much newer than the old patch. So the issue was probably corrected one way or the other. If we look at the version history of the r200 source in git, we see that 7.7.1 was made in a side branch. The attached screen dump was produced with the command $ gitk --all src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/* src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_common.? The side branch ends in gitk row 70 (the currently selected one), which precedes mesa_7_7_1_rc2, which in turn precedes mesa_7_7_1 So I could guess that one of the changes in the sidebranch actually fixes the assertion but it has not been applied (or applied incorrectly) to the "trunk" which lead towards Maverick. At least nothing has been visibly merged as we can easily see from gitk. Now we are "only" some 70-80 commits away from today. Still that will require reading some source, and from what I've seen during my investigations so far I have some doubts whether anybody not familiar with the code can do it in reasonable time. I'm not sure when I have time to investigate the source further. I might be very busy the coming weeks. Maybe you Tormod could report my findings so far upstream. (I don't have an account in freedesktop and now it's not the right time for me to get involved there.) ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21374 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21374 ** Attachment added: "gitk screenshot showing the history of r200 related source" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/656100/+attachment/1680757/+files/mesa-r200-history.png -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
I built the latest libdrm from git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/mesa/drm with these options: ./autogen.sh \ '--build=i686-linux-gnu' \ '--enable-udev' \ '--enable-libkms' \ '--enable-vmwgfx-experimental-api' \ '--enable-nouveau-experimental-api' \ '--enable-radeon' \ '--enable-intel' \ 'CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O0' \ 'build_alias=i686-linux-gnu' \ 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' \ 'CPPFLAGS=' Not to surprisingly the same assertion is still hit. Please find the full call stack in the attachment. I have not yet had time to look at the patch. ** Attachment added: "full call stack with newest mesa dri and drmlib from git" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/656100/+attachment/1678832/+files/stack.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Oops, my investigations obviously took some time. So I posted #39 without reading #38, which had come in the meantime. -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Before reporting upstream, we probably have to try their newest version. In order to get at all started with that code I first built the Ubuntu source. The Maverick debian package builds mesa obviously in 9 configurations mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa32-static/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/swx11+glu/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa16-static/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa32/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/swx11+glu-static/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa16/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/dri/config.status mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa-static/config.status I have really no clue what they are all about, so I checked what glxgears uses from the mesa source package. There are 3 libraries: /usr/lib/mesa/libGL.so.1.2:Package: libgl1-mesa-glx Source: mesa /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.070900: Package: libglu1-mesaSource: mesa /usr/lib/dri/r200_dri.so: Package: libgl1-mesa-dri Source: mesa libGL.so.1.2 is built in the dri configuration. libGLU.so.1.3.070900 is built in the wx11+glu configuration. r200_dri.so is built in the dri configuration. So I just guessed that the dri configuration might the relevant one here and built the newest mesa as follows: git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa cd mesa ./autogen.sh '--build=i686-linux-gnu' '--with-driver=dri' '--with-dri-drivers=r200' '--with-egl-displays=x11 drm' '--enable-glx-tls' '--with-state-trackers=egl,glx,dri,vega' '--enable-gles-overlay' '--enable-gles1' '--enable-gles2' '--enable-driglx-direct' '--disable-glu' '--disable-glut' '--disable-glw' '--enable-debug' 'CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O0' '--with-dri-searchpath=/usr/lib/dri:/usr/lib32/dri' 'build_alias=i686-linux-gnu' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CXXFLAGS=-g -O0' make cd lib LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. glxgears Mesa: Mesa 7.10-devel DEBUG build Oct 8 2010 11:17:51 Mesa warning: couldn't open libtxc_dxtn.so, software DXTn compression/decompression unavailable Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate. 253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 50.547 FPS 251 frames in 5.0 seconds = 50.118 FPS glxgears: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. Aborted (The assertion is sometimes hit immediately, sometimes first when resizing the window) My configuration options were some wild guessing merge of Maverick's mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/dri/config.status and the instructions given in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066, together with the assumption that gallium is not applicable to r200. Not sure where the debugging info should be written. There was nothing in syslog. This is the call stack: #0 0x0012e416 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x003bb941 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x003bee42 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x003b48e8 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x00afc158 in ?? () from /lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1 #5 0x00afcd80 in radeon_cs_write_reloc () from /lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1 #6 0x0071de59 in ctx_emit_cs (ctx=0x8072a70, atom=0x806dc30) at r200_state_init.c:575 #7 0x0074c3d2 in radeon_emit_atom (radeon=0x806d730, atom=0x806dc30) at radeon_common.c:1032 #8 0x0074c512 in radeonEmitAtoms (radeon=0x806d730, emitAll=0 '\000') at radeon_common.c:1056 #9 0x0074c708 in radeonEmitState (radeon=0x806d730) at radeon_common.c:1099 #10 0x00726f36 in r200AllocEltsOpenEnded (rmesa=0x806d730, primitive=532, min_nr=6) at r200_cmdbuf.c:210 #11 0x0072cb96 in r200AllocElts (rmesa=0x806d730, nr=6) at r200_tcl.c:164 #12 0x0072d65d in tcl_render_tri_fan_verts (ctx=0x8072a70, start=0, count=4, flags=54) at ../../../../../src/mesa/tnl_dd/t_dd_dmatmp2.h:380 #13 0x0072e574 in r200EmitPrimitive (ctx=0x8072a70, first=0, last=4, flags=54) at r200_tcl.c:249 #14 0x0072f0f9 in r200_run_tcl_render (ctx=0x8072a70, stage=0x80c5158) at r200_tcl.c:562 #15 0x0086a0a1 in _tnl_run_pipeline (ctx=0x8072a70) at tnl/t_pipeline.c:153 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #16 0x0071ba76 in r200WrapRunPipeline (ctx=0x8072a70) at r200_state.c:2460 #17 0x0086b342 in _tnl_draw_prims (ctx=0x8072a70, arrays=0x80b35dc, prim=0xb0c0, nr_prims=1, ib=0x0, min_index=0, max_index=3) at tnl/t_draw.c:478 #18 0x0086b0af in _tnl_vbo_draw_prims (ctx=0x8072a70, arrays=0x80b35dc, prim=0xb0c0, nr_prims=1, ib=0x0, index_bounds_valid=1 '\001', min_index=0, max_index=3) at tnl/t_draw.c:384 #19 0x0085dce4 in vbo_exec_DrawArrays (mode=6, start=0, count=4) at vbo/vbo_exec_array.c:526 #20 0x0085f292 in _mesa_DrawArrays (mode=6, first=0, count=4) at vbo/vbo_exec_array.c:1159 #21 0x008f64a9 in _mesa_meta_Clear (ctx=0x8072a70, buffers=18) at drivers/common/meta.c:1472 #22 0x0074d10d in radeonUserClear (ctx=0x8072a70, mask=18) at radeon_common.c:1332 #23 0x007
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Sorry, I have no idea what is Gallium or the classic driver. Google lead me to http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature. I'm not sure whether I understand the page, but it appears to me that Gallium applies only to R300 or higher. (#602267 was on R300). However, here we are talking about R200. -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] [RV250] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
Oops sorry, I start the program with stellar, but it's of course called stellarium. ** Summary changed: - [R200] [RV250] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. + [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] xkbcomp.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676881/+files/xkbcomp.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] xdpyinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676880/+files/xdpyinfo.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] setxkbmap.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676879/+files/setxkbmap.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] peripherals.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "peripherals.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676878/+files/peripherals.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Xrandr.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676877/+files/Xrandr.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] XorgLogOld.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676876/+files/XorgLogOld.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] XorgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676875/+files/XorgLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676874/+files/UdevLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676873/+files/UdevDb.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] RelatedPackageVersions.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676872/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676871/+files/ProcModules.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676870/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676869/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] PciDisplay.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676868/+files/PciDisplay.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676867/+files/Lspci.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] GdmLog2.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GdmLog2.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676866/+files/GdmLog2.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] GdmLog1.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GdmLog1.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676865/+files/GdmLog1.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] GdmLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676864/+files/GdmLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676863/+files/DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676862/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676861/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] apport information
Architecture: i386 DRM.card0.DVI.D.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 1280x854 1280x800 1280x720 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 848x480 720x480 640x480 edid-base64: DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release Candidate i386 (20100928) Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: IBM 23734G2 Package: mesa (not installed) PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available Socket 1: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card Socket 1: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=86ba0c39-2e59-4e72-ba14-9ee43a0d1943 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Tags: maverick maverick Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare dmi.bios.date: 06/18/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: IBM dmi.bios.version: 1RETDRWW (3.23 ) dmi.board.name: 23734G2 dmi.board.vendor: IBM dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 995gz93 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIBM:bvr1RETDRWW(3.23):bd06/18/2007:svnIBM:pn23734G2:pvrThinkPadT40:rvnIBM:rn23734G2:rvrNotAvailable:cvnIBM:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 23734G2 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T40 dmi.sys.vendor: IBM glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory system: distro: Ubuntu codename: maverick architecture: i686 kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
I get the same assertio on i386 with ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] (rev 02) when trying to start stellar ** Summary changed: - [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. + [R200] [RV250] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. ** Tags added: apport-collected -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645377] Re: [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards
Yes, it works after applying the latest updates. There was no update to xorg-xserver-video-ati though, so it must have been a bug somewhere else. I had too many updates at once, cannot guess which one could have fixed this issue. -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt)
Also Maverick is still affected. (I tried to apport-collect this report but it fails: > Package openjdk-6 not installed and no hook available, ignoring -- Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt)
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: 1.) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 2.) $ apt-cache policy openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre: Installed: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy openjdk-6-jre-headless openjdk-6-jre-headless: Installed: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy openjdk-6-jre-lib openjdk-6-jre-lib: Installed: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy icedtea6-plugin icedtea6-plugin: Installed: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.) What I expected a.) Go to https://www.sampopankki.fi in Firefox b.) Click on Union Jack to change language (optional, same problem occurs also in Finnish) c.) Click on "Log on to eBanking" d.) a warning appears and states that the applet signature has been verified (Verisign Class 3 Code signing certificate should be built in and trusted) This works as expected with sun-jre in both intrepid and jaunty (don't have karmic handy) 4.) What happened Java dialog appears "The application signature cannot be verified." The certificate is signed by: Version 3 Serial 134678584529721923331408176609551902556 Signature Algorithm SHA1withRSA Issuer OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign, Inc.", C=US Validity Validity: [From: Thu May 21 03:00:00 EEST 2009, To: Tue May 21 02:59:59 EEST 2019] Subject CN=VeriSign Class 3 Code Signing 2009-2 CA, OU=Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)09, OU=VeriSign Trust Network, O="VeriSign, Inc.", C=US Signature : 8B 03 C0 DD 94 D8 41 A2 61 69 B0 15 A8 78 C7 30 ..A.ai...x.0 0010: C6 90 3C 7E 42 F7 24 B6 E4 83 73 17 04 7F 04 10 ..<.B.$...s. 0020: 9C A1 E2 FA 81 2F EB C0 CA 44 E7 72 E0 50 B6 55 ./...D.r.P.U 0030: 10 20 83 6E 96 92 E4 9A 51 6A B4 37 31 DC A5 2D . .nQj.71..- 0040: EB 8C 00 C7 1D 4F E7 4D 32 BA 85 F8 4E BE FA 67 .O.M2...N..g 0050: 55 65 F0 6A BE 7A CA 64 38 1A 10 10 78 45 76 31 Ue.j.z.d8...xEv1 0060: F3 86 7A 03 0F 60 C2 B3 5D 9D F6 8B 66 76 82 1B ..z..`..]...fv.. 0070: 59 E1 83 E5 BD 49 A5 38 56 E5 DE 41 77 0E 58 0F YI.8V..Aw.X. MD5 Fingerprint 56:10:5F:6D:97:18:DE:7F:83:52:1E:3A:40:F8:68:AF SHA1 Fingerprint 12:D4:87:2B:C3:EF:01:9E:7E:0B:6F:13:24:80:AE:29:DB:5B:1C:A3 + --- + Architecture: i386 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release Candidate i386 (20100928) + Package: openjdk-6 + PackageArchitecture: all + ProcEnviron: + LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/566317/+attachment/1676556/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645377] Re: [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards
oops sorry: I meant it works on my ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] rev 2, cannot speak for others. -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655979] [NEW] Maverick: ubiquity gtk front-end gets stuck in keyboard selection
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity If the user during keyboard selection double-clicks into the left list - the mouse cursor will change to the rotating symbol - Forward button will be greyed out - Backward button will be greyed out After that I did not find any way to complete the installation. Probably I should click the forward button, but as long as it is greyed out things don't move. The bug was reproducible twice very easily on the Maverick Release Candidate Desktop CD. If really needed I can provide a screen photo and apport-collect from the the LiveCD session. P.S. This failure is more likely to happen because of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463285. If the right list is frozen the user might try all kind of tricks to "unfreeze" it. E.g. double-clicking into the left list. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Maverick: ubiquity gtk front-end gets stuck in keyboard selection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328437] Re: initramfs generated before removing casper
The problem has now been fixed for the Lucid 10.04.1 Finnish Remix Desktop CD. The correct instructions are indeed at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomization sudo sed -i '/casper/d' extract-cd/casper/filesystem.manifest-desktop If I read the previous comments correctly, nobody has got this problem from a vanilla desktop LiveCD. So I guess the report is actually invalid (but I leave the status change to the original reporter or the installer team). -- initramfs generated before removing casper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463285] Re: Typing a keyboard layout to jump in the list shows the wrong selections on the right-hand side
This affects also Maverick Release Candidate. Probably the bug is the same as before, but the effects are now much worse than before. The problem seems to occur whenever you change the selection in the left window (either by scrolling or typing starting letters) before the right window has been updated for your current selection. Because the keyboard selection in Maverick is happening while files are being copied the response time for updating the right window is quite long (at least when using a slow CD-RW for the Live Session) and it is very likely that the user changes the selection in the left list before the right list has been updated. After this has happened once the right selection gets permanent. Especially if you happen to get frozen in a script that you cannot read (happened to me with Ethiopian) the system is completely unusable. I did not find any other way than to abort the installation and start from scratch. (Yes, you probably could repair the problem from the text console as long as the final configuration has not taken place. But that's beyond of an average user) I can provide screen photos and I can apport-collect the report from a LiveCD session. However, I don't currently see why that should be necessary for this report, so I'll do it only on request. -- Typing a keyboard layout to jump in the list shows the wrong selections on the right-hand side https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310329] Re: apt-get install option --[no]-install-recommends should be documented
Options are documented in Lucid at least. (I think it happened already earlier) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- apt-get install option --[no]-install-recommends should be documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
For comparison the certificate chain as built by Sun's Java (also on Lucid) (Sorry, I wasn't able to resize the dialog to show more info) ** Attachment added: "cert chain in Sun Java" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/566317/+attachment/1651116/+files/sampo-cert-sun.png ** Summary changed: - Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature + Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) -- Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
Sorry, my conclusions in #5 was incorrect. The root certificate is indeed in the certificate store. It is Owner: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign, Inc.", C= US Issuer: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign, Inc.", C =US Serial number: 70bae41d10d92934b638ca7b03ccbabf Valid from: Mon Jan 29 02:00:00 EET 1996 until: Wed Aug 02 02:59:59 EEST 2028 Certificate fingerprints: MD5: 10:FC:63:5D:F6:26:3E:0D:F3:25:BE:5F:79:CD:67:67 SHA1: 74:2C:31:92:E6:07:E4:24:EB:45:49:54:2B:E1:BB:C5:3E:61:74:E2 Signature algorithm name: MD2withRSA Version: 1 The problem is a different one. OpenJDK doesn't build the chain from the intermediate Code Signing certificate to the root certificate. See attached screen shot. ** Attachment added: "cert chain in OpenJDK" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/566317/+attachment/1651106/+files/sampo-cert-openjdk.png -- Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
** Also affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
Tested today with $ apt-cache policy ca-certificates-javaca-certificates-java: Installed: 20100406ubuntu1 Candidate: 20100406ubuntu1 Version table: *** 20100406ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
The CA certificates file exists twice on /usr/share/ca-certificates-java/cacerts /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts I have not added any certificate in any phase and both files have identical contents. (There is also a symbolic link /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/security/cacerts -> /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts) The contents of the file can be listed using the command keytool -list -storetype jks -keystore /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts -v The password is "changeit" And indeed, the VeriSign Class 3 Code Signing 2009-2 CA certificate is not on the list. The certificate has always been accepted by sun-java (tested with at least hardy, intrepid, jaunty and lucid). So if Sun & Sampopankki have not made a fundamental mistake, it should be safe for OpenJDK to trust that certifcate, too. -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature
CA certificates obviously installed by this package ** Package changed: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) => ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification
Because the linux-generic fix in question was an ABI change, a new package not previously installed was pulled. However, it was not from security either: $ apt-cache policy linux-image-generic linux-image-generic: Installed: 2.6.32.25.27 Candidate: 2.6.32.25.27 Version table: *** 2.6.32.25.27 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.6.32.24.25 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 2.6.32.21.22 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages $ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic: Installed: 2.6.32-25.44 Candidate: 2.6.32-25.44 Version table: *** 2.6.32-25.44 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ (These commands executed after applying the update. Nothing vsible in kpackagekit at this point of time anymore of course) -- kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649284] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/649284/+attachment/1645860/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Summary changed: - kpackagekit shows incorrect security classifiaction + kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification -- kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classifiaction
** Attachment added: "screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284/+attachment/1645815/+files/kpackagekit.png ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kpackagekit In Lucid kpackagekit shows a fix in the wrong group from time to time. This is difficult to reproduce, because it depends on the package versions installed and on the package versions available from the repos. So in normal usage (i.e. if you don't downgrade packages) the same problem will never appear twice. Today I happen to have the issue for linux-generic: $ apt-cache policy linux-generic linux-generic: Installed: 2.6.32.24.25 Candidate: 2.6.32.25.27 Version table: 2.6.32.25.27 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages *** 2.6.32.24.25 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.6.32.21.22 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages $ The candidate version comes from lucid-updates, not from lucid security. Still kpackagekit shows it as a security fix. See attached screen shot. Note that the version numbers in kpackagekit are equal to those shown by apt-cache. - I will apport-collect this report ASAP in order to provide necessary - version info. + I will apport-collect this report ASAP in order to provide necessary version info. + --- + Architecture: i386 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100406.1) + Package: kpackagekit 0.5.4-0ubuntu4.3 + PackageArchitecture: i386 + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 + Tags: lucid + Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649284] [NEW] kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kpackagekit In Lucid kpackagekit shows a fix in the wrong group from time to time. This is difficult to reproduce, because it depends on the package versions installed and on the package versions available from the repos. So in normal usage (i.e. if you don't downgrade packages) the same problem will never appear twice. Today I happen to have the issue for linux-generic: $ apt-cache policy linux-generic linux-generic: Installed: 2.6.32.24.25 Candidate: 2.6.32.25.27 Version table: 2.6.32.25.27 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages *** 2.6.32.24.25 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.6.32.21.22 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages $ The candidate version comes from lucid-updates, not from lucid security. Still kpackagekit shows it as a security fix. See attached screen shot. Note that the version numbers in kpackagekit are equal to those shown by apt-cache. I will apport-collect this report ASAP in order to provide necessary version info. --- Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100406.1) Package: kpackagekit 0.5.4-0ubuntu4.3 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Tags: lucid Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: kpackagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-collected kubuntu -- kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528679] Re: Kpackedkit update details inform that there are no update descriptions
Yes, this happens from time to time lin Lucid. It looks like a network error (I guess it fetches the description from a Canonical server). But it happens at least 10 times more frequently than network errors in other programs, e.g. Browser. So I'm sure this could be somehow improved in kpackagekit. Maybe just retrying if the first attempt fails? (I understand browsers do this) -- Kpackedkit update details inform that there are no update descriptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] Re: Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect
I just learned that there is an important difference between a DWA-140 and a DWA-140 ver. B2. The DWA-140 contains an RT2870, the DWA-140 B2 contains an RT3070. The device I have borrowed is a B2, so the apport logs above apply to RT3070 only. In Lucid downloading and building the RT3070 driver from Ralink solves the problem. (I have also the rt2800usb driver blacklisted, not yet double-checked whether that is required) Maverick not yet tested. -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 549801] Re: USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect
Please ignore comment #33. It turned out that my device (D-Link DWA-140 B2) contains an RT3070, not an RT2870. Getting the driver source from Ralink and building makes it work on Lucid; Maverick not yet tested Sorry about the noise. -- USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 549801] Re: USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905. I've just apport- collected it on Maverick daily CD from today 24-Sep-2010. I guess the reports might be duplicates, but I'll leave the decision to sombody who knows. -- USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645377] Re: [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards
** Summary changed: - resolution incorrectly detected on radeon 7500 + [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645377] Re: resolution incorrectly detected on radeon 7500
Happens also on my IBM Thinkpad T40. ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] rev 2, Reproduced with http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ 24-Sep-2010 Work-around: xrandr --output LVDS --mode 1400x1050 -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586776] Re: Ubuntu Lucid installer encounters unrecoverable error on IBM T40
The problem does no longer occur with the Ubuntu 10.04.1 32 bit Desktop LiveCD. (It is still repeatable with the 10.04 LiveCD) ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Ubuntu Lucid installer encounters unrecoverable error on IBM T40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632502/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632501/+files/UdevLog.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] Re: Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect
Please note that I have only borrowed this DWA-140. Actually I got it to find out how to make it work. So I might not be able to test with this device in future. -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632500/+files/UdevDb.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] RfKill.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632499/+files/RfKill.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632495/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632498/+files/ProcModules.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632497/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573905] PciMultimedia.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632494/+files/PciMultimedia.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
