[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written
Re #103 Just tested the new package from proposed together with Firefox 127.0.2. Things appear to work just as expected now and I can no longer reproduce the issue. Haven't found any side-effects in other places either so far. Looks like this is now finally fixed in 22.04 with only a few weeks left before the upgrade to 24.04 rolls out ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970989]
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/install-firefox-linux#w_install- firefox-deb-package-for-debian-based-distributions *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1799516 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970989 Title: missing a tightly integrated deb package without snap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1970989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060534]
Yes indeed, I was thinking a startup migration check should be the way to go. Do we have a way to safely detect only those files that have been generated by folder compaction? To make sure we exclude any user generated content. NI Geoff and Magnus to get some validation or suggestions here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060534 Title: Thunderbird doesn't always clean nstmp cache files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/2060534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060534]
Ben, can you tackle this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060534 Title: Thunderbird doesn't always clean nstmp cache files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/2060534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2049562] Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds vboxdrv
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2037082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037082 So this bug was fixed in the package virtualbox - 7.0.14-dfsg-2 as mentioned in bug #2037082 But VirtualBox for Ubuntu 22.04.1 was recently updated to version 6.1.50 and the bug is still present. The bug still has to be fixed for the 6.1 branch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049562 Title: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds vboxdrv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/2049562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067810] Re: New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic
When I run the command you mentioned, it prints the correct architecture successfully and it does not log a new apparmor DENIED message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067810 Title: New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067810/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067810] Re: New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic
When I execute "apt update", then the denial happens. It also happens upon boot. I did not see anything relevant in /var/log/ubuntu- advantage.log, but here is a snippet of /var/log/syslog on bootup: Jun 1 20:04:07 droid systemd[1]: Starting Update APT News... Jun 1 20:04:07 droid systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM caches... Jun 1 20:04:07 droid systemd[1]: Started Update APT News. Jun 1 20:04:07 droid kernel: [ 14.897120] kauditd_printk_skb: 48 callbacks suppressed Jun 1 20:04:07 droid kernel: [ 14.897125] audit: type=1400 audit(1717265047.937:60): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="ubuntu_pro_esm_cache//dpkg" name="/var/lib/dpkg/arch" pid=2380 comm="dpkg" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 Jun 1 20:04:08 droid kernel: [ 14.994224] audit: type=1400 audit(1717265048.033:61): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="ubuntu_pro_esm_cache//dpkg" name="/var/lib/dpkg/arch" pid=2381 comm="dpkg" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 Jun 1 20:04:08 droid kernel: [ 14.997591] audit: type=1400 audit(1717265048.037:62): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="ubuntu_pro_esm_cache//dpkg" name="/var/lib/dpkg/arch" pid=2382 comm="dpkg" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 Jun 1 20:04:08 droid kernel: [ 15.000624] audit: type=1400 audit(1717265048.041:63): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="ubuntu_pro_esm_cache//dpkg" name="/var/lib/dpkg/arch" pid=2383 comm="dpkg" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067810 Title: New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067810/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067839] [NEW] not able to upgrade to 22.04
Public bug reported: some ppa, not knowing which one generates the issue ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.41 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-182.202-generic 5.4.269 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-182-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Jun 2 17:26:11 2024 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-23 (2870 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2024-06-02 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067839 Title: not able to upgrade to 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2067839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067810] [NEW] New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic
Public bug reported:
ubuntu-advantage-tools 32.3~18.04 is causing a new apparmor denial on
Bionic when updating:
[ 8091.769560] audit: type=1400 audit(1717273124.410:121):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="ubuntu_pro_esm_cache//dpkg"
name="/var/lib/dpkg/arch" pid=10358 comm="dpkg" requested_mask="r"
denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Fix:
--- /etc/apparmor.d/ubuntu_pro_esm_cache.orig 2024-06-01 22:31:28.276735437
+0200
+++ /etc/apparmor.d/ubuntu_pro_esm_cache2024-06-01 22:31:07.163884846
+0200
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@
/etc/dpkg/** r,
+/var/lib/dpkg/** r,
+
/{,usr/}bin/dpkg mr,
}
** Affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067810
Title:
New Apparmor denial with ubuntu-advantage-tools on bionic
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067810/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067433] [NEW] Switching windows causes application menu icons to be scaled up
Public bug reported: When switching windows with [CTRL] + [ALT] + [ARROW KEYS], opening the application menu by double clicking [SUPER] will cause the application icons to be very zoomed in. Closing and re-opening the application menu fixes this problem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Wed May 29 12:22:09 2024 DistUpgraded: 2024-05-23 13:35:14,878 DEBUG migrateToDeb822Sources() DistroCodename: noble DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0a16] (rev 0b) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller [103c:198f] InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-05 (54 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20230807.2) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 840 G1 ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-31-generic root=UUID=5ceaeb2c-3552-4825-ad08-2b372fa8a56c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-05-23 (6 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 02/24/2020 dmi.bios.release: 1.49 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: L71 Ver. 01.49 dmi.board.name: 198F dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 15.59 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.ec.firmware.release: 21.89 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrL71Ver.01.49:bd02/24/2020:br1.49:efr21.89:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteBook840G1:pvrA3009DD10303:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn198F:rvrKBCVersion15.59:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr:skuG2F85PA#ABG: dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN G=N L=BUS B=HP S=ELI dmi.product.name: HP EliteBook 840 G1 dmi.product.sku: G2F85PA#ABG dmi.product.version: A3009DD10303 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.120-2build1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 24.0.5-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.12-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:22.0.0-1build1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20210115-1build1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble ubuntu wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067433 Title: Switching windows causes application menu icons to be scaled up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2067433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062951] Re: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04)
I have back tracked to the duplicate bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958191 and followed the suggested fix, which was patch grub boot;- Patched my grub boot file GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash i915.enable_dc=0 intel_idle.max_cstate=2" sudo update-grub and restarted machine Works a treat no more screen flicker after upgrade to 24.04 and several reboots just to be sure fix worked on Dell Insperion 9555 i7 64/16Gb 1Tb Radeon GPU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062951 Title: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062951] Re: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04)
Hi, OK I have tried both temporary and permanent grub boot changes with modified intel_idle.max_cstate=2 and 4 and on all occasions after grub update and reboot the boot splash page is steady the login page flickers badly and the desktop settles but still flickers. Tks for the help but unfortunately workaround does not work on the Dell Insperion 955 Intel i7 64/16Gb 1tb Radeon GPU. Ive include a snap shot of my patched grub boot file. ** Attachment added: "GrubIdlePatch.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062951/+attachment/5781539/+files/GrubIdlePatch.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062951 Title: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064189] Re: Screen flickers after installing Ubuntu 24.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2062951 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062951 I have reverted and re-installed 24.04 upgrade on two occasions both times,, same issue, This work round only slows the occurrences of flickering, it does not fix the issue for me on my Dell Insperion 9555 Intel i7 64/16Gb 1Tb Radeon GPU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064189 Title: Screen flickers after installing Ubuntu 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2064189/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062951] Re: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04)
Ive never had the issue with any distro. So okay the bug is confirmed and it has a duplicate but in none of the reports, duplicates or otherwise, can I find a fix. Running 24.04 on a Dell Insperion 9555 Intel i7 64/16Gig 1tb Radeon graphics Does a fix exist for this bug ?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062951 Title: Random flickering with Intel i915 on Linux 6.8 (Ubuntu 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP
** Also affects: guix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844 Title: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2046844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064115] Re: Conflict between apparmor and guix on Ubuntu 24.04
Looks like this is a case of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2046844
What does work as a workaround is to create a specifc apparmor profile
for guix, that is really unconfined and allows user namespaces:
Create a file /etc/apparmor.d/guix:
abi ,
include
profile guix /usr/bin/guix flags=(unconfined) {
userns,
# Site-specific additions and overrides. See local/README for details.
include if exists
}
Then do:
/etc/init.d/apparmor reload
aa-enforce guix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064115
Title:
Conflict between apparmor and guix on Ubuntu 24.04
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guix/+bug/2064115/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064115] Re: Conflict between apparmor and guix on Ubuntu 24.04
Uninstalling `apparmor` and rebooting is the only thing i have found that makes it work. Selectively disabling the specific rulset with: # aa-disable unprivileged_userns Gives a new error: $ guix environment -C guix environment: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment guix environment: error: clone: 2114060305: Permission denied Same for temporarily turning off apparmor entirely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064115 Title: Conflict between apparmor and guix on Ubuntu 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guix/+bug/2064115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064115] [NEW] Conflict between apparmor and guix on Ubuntu 24.04
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 24.04 i'm unable to use GNU guix as installed from the apt repository. Version: Package: guix Architecture: amd64 Version: 1.4.0-6build1 To reproduce: - Install a fresh 23.10 host - Upgrade to 24.04 with do-release-upgrade -d (but i’ve heard reports that this also happens with clean 24.04 install), reboot - `apt-install guix` - Create an unprivileged user with adduser - `guix environment -C` as the user gives: ``` $ guix environment -C guix environment: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% 0.4 MB will be downloaded glibc-utf8-locales-2.33 382KiB 1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/19qqzzam5250zsxakc4ym0a28b4sd8nv-profile.drv 22.1 MB will be downloaded substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% bash-5.1.8-doc 301KiB 1.8MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% bash-static-5.1.8 646KiB 6.4MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% module-import-compiled 102KiB 3.5MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% glibc-2.33 13.1MiB 16.8MiB/s 00:01 [##] 100.0% bash-minimal-5.1.8 624KiB 26.4MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% gcc-10.3.0-lib 9.0MiB 13.8MiB/s 00:01 [##] 100.0% libffi-3.3 67KiB 12.2MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% libgc-8.0.4 262KiB 12.7MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% libunistring-0.9.10 781KiB 15.1MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% ncurses-6.2.20210619 1.1MiB 2.9MiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0% pkg-config-0.29.2 454KiB
[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
Hello Timo, after allowing packages from 'proposed' I manually upgraded these packages: rsync (version 3.2.3-8ubuntu3) ... upgraded to version 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 timeshift (version 21.09.1-1) ... upgraded to version 21.09.1-1ubuntu1 (rsync had previously been held back) Then I successfully ran - an on-demand snapshot from timeshift gui - an automated boot-snapshot Both worked w/o problems recognized and show up in timeshift gui as expected. Thank you all for fixing that issue! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885 Title: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/timeshift/+bug/2009885/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062373] Re: 24.04 TPM backed FDE regression following snapd 2.62 update
I can confirm that updating from 23.10 to 24.04 also keeps the channel for pc-kernel at 23.10/stable. However the upgrade did install snapd 2.62 (which seems to work fine). Changing the channel for pc-kernel to 24/stable works fine though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062373 Title: 24.04 TPM backed FDE regression following snapd 2.62 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2062373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061126] [NEW] Upgrade to 24.04 beta fails
Public bug reported: Upgrading from 23.10 to 24.04 beta aborts. 1. upgrading window shows %s instead of version number 2. says "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade" looks like an issue with postgresql-15 from the logs ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:23.10.8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CrashDB: ubuntu CrashReports: 640:0:119:462566:2024-04-10 17:24:39.291176860 +0100:2024-04-10 17:24:39.335176861 +0100:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_thermald.0.crash 644:0:119:0:2024-04-10 17:24:39.291176860 +0100:2024-04-10 17:24:39.291176860 +0100:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_thermald.0.upload 600:112:119:37:2024-04-10 17:24:42.115176923 +0100:2024-04-10 17:24:42.115176923 +0100:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_thermald.0.uploaded CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Apr 12 12:25:44 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-08 (2378 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170926) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2024-04-12 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog: Start-Date: 2024-04-12 12:16:33 Requested-By: paulw (1000) End-Date: 2024-04-12 12:16:33 VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog: Log started: 2024-04-12 12:16:33 Log ended: 2024-04-12 12:16:33 VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade mantic ** Attachment added: "screen shot of %s instead of 24.04" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061126/+attachment/5764216/+files/ubuntu%20error.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061126 Title: Upgrade to 24.04 beta fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2061126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059181] [NEW] update-java-alternatives show error with openjdk-8-jre-headless
Public bug reported: Alternatives for jexec have been excluded from the latest version of openjdk-8-jre-headless (8u402) and this causes update-java-alternatives to throw the following error: update-alternatives: error: alternative /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk- amd64/jre/lib/jexec for jexec not registered; not setting Solution: Reference to jexec should be removed from /usr/lib/jvm/.java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64.jinfo since update-java- alternatives uses this file to determine what alternatives to create. Patch: --- .java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64.jinfo.backup 2024-02-27 15:08:05.0 +0100 +++ .java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64.jinfo 2024-03-27 00:57:58.136594220 +0100 @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ hl orbd /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/orbd hl servertool /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/servertool hl tnameserv /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/tnameserv -hl jexec /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/jexec jre policytool /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/policytool jdkhl jdeps /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/jdeps jdkhl wsimport /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/wsimport ** Affects: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059181 Title: update-java-alternatives show error with openjdk-8-jre-headless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2059181/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058935] [NEW] Crash while transforming image
Public bug reported:
```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.30
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_30
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-11/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-11
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-bootstrap --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes
--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object
--disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib
--enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --enable-cet
--with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32
--enable-multilib --with-tune=generic
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr
--without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --enable-link-serialization=2
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)
# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.92 (compiled against version 0.1.92)
using GEGL version 0.4.34 (compiled against version 0.4.34)
using GLib version 2.72.4 (compiled against version 2.72.4)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.42.8 (compiled against version 2.42.8)
using GTK+ version 2.24.33 (compiled against version 2.24.33)
using Pango version 1.50.6 (compiled against version 1.50.6)
using Fontconfig version 2.13.1 (compiled against version 2.13.1)
using Cairo version 1.16.0 (compiled against version 1.16.0)
```
> fatal error: Speicherzugriffsfehler
Stack trace:
```
# Stack traces obtained from PID 9241 - Thread 9241 #
[New LWP 9244]
[New LWP 9245]
[New LWP 9246]
[New LWP 9247]
[New LWP 9248]
[New LWP 9249]
[New LWP 9250]
[New LWP 9251]
[New LWP 9252]
[New LWP 9253]
[New LWP 9285]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
__GI___libc_read (nbytes=256, buf=0x7ffefa4e9490, fd=16) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
Id Target Id Frame
* 1Thread 0x77a8f1359e80 (LWP 9241) "gimp-2.10" __GI___libc_read
(nbytes=256, buf=0x7ffefa4e9490, fd=16) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
2Thread 0x77a8f095b640 (LWP 9244) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
3Thread 0x77a8f015a640 (LWP 9245) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
4Thread 0x77a8e7959640 (LWP 9246) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
5Thread 0x77a8ef959640 (LWP 9247) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
6Thread 0x77a8ef158640 (LWP 9248) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
7Thread 0x77a8ee957640 (LWP 9249) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
8Thread 0x77a8ee156640 (LWP 9250) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
9Thread 0x77a8ed47c640 (LWP 9251) "gmain" 0x77a8f1f18bcf in
__GI___poll (fds=0x61178e332210, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
10 Thread 0x77a8ecc7b640 (LWP 9252) "gdbus" 0x77a8f1f18bcf in
__GI___poll (fds=0x61178e344e00, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
11 Thread 0x77a8c11ff640 (LWP 9253) "async" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
12 Thread 0x77a8b73ff640 (LWP 9285) "swap writer" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
Thread 12 (Thread 0x77a8b73ff640 (LWP 9285) "swap writer"):
#0 syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
#1 0x77a8f22f8b43 in g_cond_wait () at
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x77a8f2882c99 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgegl-0.4.so.0
#3 0x77a8f22d8a51 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 0x77a8f1e94ac3 in start_thread (arg=) at
./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
ret =
pd =
unwind_buf = {cancel_jmp_buf = {{jmp_buf = {140733097883184,
[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
On my Ubuntu 22.04 timeshift is still version 21.09.1-1 (02 Oct 2021). No newer version is available from repository. For the average user timeshift-snapshots stopped working ONE YEAR AGO - afaik w/o any notification (apart from entries in log files). For this reason, I consider this error to be rather critical and its importance should really be increased. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885 Title: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/timeshift/+bug/2009885/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058233] [NEW] Sound choppy watching video with bluetooth headset
Public bug reported: This is consistent across firefox, chrome and VLC. Checked all settings I could find in the GUI (still new to linux), and headphones seemed to be connected just fine. Sound test in the settings worked fine. Everything works well when using wired headphones. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-25.25-generic 6.5.13 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: whistler 2494 F wireplumber /dev/snd/controlC1: whistler 2494 F wireplumber /dev/snd/seq:whistler 2478 F pipewire CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Mar 18 11:51:27 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-02-23 (24 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231016.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 10/31/2019 dmi.bios.release: 1.31 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: JDET69WW (1.31 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: Intel powered classmate PC dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0E50519 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.28 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrJDET69WW(1.31):bd10/31/2019:br1.31:efr1.28:svnLENOVO:pn20DSS0U800:pvrThinkPadL450:rvnLENOVO:rnIntelpoweredclassmatePC:rvrSDK0E50519WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20DS_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadL450: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad L450 dmi.product.name: 20DSS0U800 dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20DS_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad L450 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad L450 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug mantic wayland-session ** Description changed: This is consistent across firefox, chrome and VLC. Checked all settings - I could find (in the GUI, still new to all this). + I could find in the GUI (still new to linux), and headphones seemed to + be connected just fine. Sound test in the settings worked fine. + Everything works well when using wired headphones. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-25.25-generic 6.5.13 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: whistler 2494 F wireplumber - /dev/snd/controlC1: whistler 2494 F wireplumber - /dev/snd/seq:whistler 2478 F pipewire + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: whistler 2494 F wireplumber + /dev/snd/controlC1: whistler 2494 F wireplumber + /dev/snd/seq:whistler 2478 F pipewire CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Mar 18 11:51:27 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-02-23 (24 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231016.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - PATH=(custom, no user) - SHELL=/bin/bash - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + PATH=(custom, no user) + SHELL=/bin/bash + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 10/31/2019 dmi.bios.release: 1.31 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: JDET69WW (1.31 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: Intel powered classmate PC dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0E50519 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.28 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrJDET69WW(1.31):bd10/31/2019:br1.31:efr1.28:svnLENOVO:pn20DSS0U800:pvrThinkPadL450:rvnLENOVO:rnIntelpoweredclassmatePC:rvrSDK0E50519WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20DS_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadL450: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad L450 dmi.product.name: 20DSS0U800 dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20DS_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad L450 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad L450 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058233 Title: Sound choppy watching video with bluetooth headset To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1884274] Re: After login, plasma takes extremely long before desktop is shown
Yeah, I don't have that installation anymore, so I can't reproduce. Propose to close. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884274 Title: After login, plasma takes extremely long before desktop is shown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1884274/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1828107] Re: gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled SMB1
@BloodyIron, please see: https://github.com/christgau/wsdd I suggest you install as it is a significantly better work-around than constantly killing the daemon. It is intended to be released in the next Debian (bookworm) release as a package, I do not know if Ubuntu will also be including it in their next release. Whether Nautilus will use it or not, I could not answer to that - I have long since switched to using Thunar without any issues. With regards to "If restarting it 'fixers' it, then why on earth does it break in the first place?" I suggest you see one of the replies here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues/307 and further reading here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues/506 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues #307 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues/307 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (1881780). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828107 Title: gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled SMB1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1828107/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2007456] Re: CVE-2023-20032: Fixed a possible remote code execution vulnerability in the HFS+ file parser.
Is there anything that I, and/or others, can do to help resolve this CVE? As its a critical (9.8 CVE) RCE, I'm quite concerned about running ClamAV right now with any exposure to the internet, and have begun looking into compiling a drop-in replacement of ClamAV for this existing package. If there's anything I can do to help test or compile the upstream code with different options, please let me know. I'm happy to help, as I want to see this resolved as quickly as possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007456 Title: CVE-2023-20032: Fixed a possible remote code execution vulnerability in the HFS+ file parser. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2007456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2007456] Re: CVE-2023-20032: Fixed a possible remote code execution vulnerability in the HFS+ file parser.
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2023-20032 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007456 Title: CVE-2023-20032: Fixed a possible remote code execution vulnerability in the HFS+ file parser. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2007456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964547]
*** Bug 1771632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964547 Title: [upstream] RDD sandbox prevents HW-accelerated video playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1964547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964547]
As of bug 1770407, MOZ_DISABLE_RDD_SANDBOX=1 is no longer needed for Mesa users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964547 Title: [upstream] RDD sandbox prevents HW-accelerated video playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1964547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971168]
(In reply to Al Savage from comment #6) > [...] it may not be limited to FF, snaps, or even Mozilla, since my Chrome > install behaves similarly. You are right, this is actually affecting other applications, too. I get the exact same behavior described in the steps to reproduce when using Chromium installed via snap: Local files open fine, opening files on network shares does not trigger any reaction. Should this issue here remain open? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share
I've updated the bug to reflect that multiple applications are affected by this. On my system I can reproduce the issue with Firefox and Chromium, both installed via snap. ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Steps to reproduce: - 1. Run Firefox as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 + 1. Run Firefox or Chromium as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 2. Have a SMB file server available where the network shares can be mounted just by clicking on the share in Nautilus file manager (smb:// protocol, usually mounted dynamically via `/var/run/user/.../gvfs/...`) 3. Have one such share mounted and writable - 4. Open any website containing images in Firefox + 4. Open any website containing images in Firefox / Chromium 5. Right-click on an image and select "Save Image As..." 6. In the file save dialog, navigate to the mounted share 7. Assert content of network share is visible and browsable from within the save dialog 8. Select "Save" at any folder in the network share Actual behavior: * File is not saved to selected network share location * No download entry is created * No error is shown Expected behavior: * File is saved to selected network share location * No error is shown Additional information: * When saving to a folder on the local machine instead, saving works correctly as expected * In contrast to files, new folders that are created from within the save dialog are saved correctly on the network share + * Similar situation when trying to open a file with Ctrl + O on a network share from Firefox / Chromium. After double-clicking e.g. an image file in the file dialog, the file dialog closes but nothing happens otherwise. Opening an image on a local folder works fine. ** Summary changed: - [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share + [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971092]
Verified fixed, thanks. xwayland: $ snap run firefox wayland: $ MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 snap run firefox xwayland: $ MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=0 snap run firefox -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971092 Title: (touch broken: "glxtest: Could not connect to wayland socket" after upgrade to 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1971092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share
Corresponding bug in Mozilla bugtracker: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767316 ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1767316 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767316 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share
** Description changed: Steps to reproduce: 1. Run Firefox as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 2. Have a SMB file server available where the network shares can be mounted just by clicking on the share in Nautilus file manager (smb:// protocol, usually mounted dynamically via `/var/run/user/.../gvfs/...`) 3. Have one such share mounted and writable 4. Open any website containing images in Firefox 5. Right-click on an image and select "Save Image As..." 6. In the file save dialog, navigate to the mounted share 7. Assert content of network share is visible and browsable from within the save dialog 8. Select "Save" at any folder in the network share Actual behavior: * File is not saved to selected network share location * No download entry is created * No error is shown Expected behavior: * File is saved to selected network share location * No error is shown Additional information: - * When saving to a folder on the local machine instead, saving works - correctly as expected. + * When saving to a folder on the local machine instead, saving works correctly as expected + * In contrast to files, new folders that are created from within the save dialog are saved correctly on the network share -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971168] [NEW] [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1. Run Firefox as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 2. Have a SMB file server available where the network shares can be mounted just by clicking on the share in Nautilus file manager (smb:// protocol, usually mounted dynamically via `/var/run/user/.../gvfs/...`) 3. Have one such share mounted and writable 4. Open any website containing images in Firefox 5. Right-click on an image and select "Save Image As..." 6. In the file save dialog, navigate to the mounted share 7. Assert content of network share is visible and browsable from within the save dialog 8. Select "Save" at any folder in the network share Actual behavior: * File is not saved to selected network share location * No download entry is created * No error is shown Expected behavior: * File is saved to selected network share location * No error is shown Additional information: * When saving to a folder on the local machine instead, saving works correctly as expected * In contrast to files, new folders that are created from within the save dialog are saved correctly on the network share ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971168 Title: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1971168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Re: Read-only file system on a battery
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585303/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] acpidump.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585304/+files/acpidump.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585302/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] RfKill.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585301/+files/RfKill.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] PulseList.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585300/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585299/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585298/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585297/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585296/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585295/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] PaInfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PaInfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585294/+files/PaInfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Lsusb-v.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585293/+files/Lsusb-v.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Lsusb-t.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585292/+files/Lsusb-t.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585291/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Lspci-vt.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585290/+files/Lspci-vt.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585289/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] IwConfig.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585288/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585287/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] CRDA.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585286/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Re: Read-only file system on a battery
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected impish ** Description changed: I have a 2021 Dell XPS 15 (9510) i7-11800H, 16 GB, 512 GB SSD, RTX 3050Ti, Windows 11 Pro. I’ve updated the following components: - replaced the RAM to 2x32 GB - added a brand new Samsung 980 Pro to the second NVMe slot On the secondary NVMe drive, I’ve installed Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. Usually, I use Dell WD19TBS USB-C 180W to supply the power, Internet, external USB keyboard and mouse, and two monitors. When doing so, everything seems to be working perfectly for a long time whether working with Ubuntu or Windows. However, when the laptop is running on battery, I’m observing Ubuntu freezes that happen anywhere between seconds to minutes after a reboot. The keyboard stops responding, the icons go missing, and I’m getting dropped to the terminal with the following messages appearing: __ext4_find_entry:1611 inode #12272199: comm gmain: reading directory lblock 0 __ext4_find_entry:1611 inode #12272199: comm gmain: reading directory lblock 0 And after a few seconds, the following start to appear: system-journald: Failed to write entry (22 items, 750 bytes), ignoring: Read-only file system system-journald: Failed to write entry (22 items, 750 bytes), ignoring: Read-only file system It seems that disconnecting the docking station usually triggers the freeze immediately. When starting from a battery, it usually takes a few minutes before everything freezes. The only way to recover is to do a power long-press. If I do this sequence a few times - boot, wait for hang, power long-press, boot again, usually at some point the Samsung 980 Pro is no longer visible in the BIOS. I need to boot into Windows, wait a bit, reboot again, and the drive appears and it’s possible to boot to Ubuntu What I’ve tried: update Ubuntu to 21.10 update to the latest kernel: 5.13.0-41-generic update all drivers, including BIOS, from Windows using Dell SupportAssistant update Samsung 980 Pro firmware through Samsung Magican enabling Full Power Mode in Samsung Magician check SMART report for Samsung, it’s all clear change GRUB params, currently they look like this: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash pcie_aspm=off nvme_load=YES nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=250 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0" tried also default_ps_max_latency values 0, 5500 fsck from a live boot pendrive It looks like the drive decides to go to a sleep at some point and does not wake up. Windows works well both with docking station and battery, the Samsung NVMe is recognized by Samsung Magician. Any hint what else can I check? Thank you! + --- + ProblemType: Bug + ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71.1 + Architecture: amd64 + AudioDevicesInUse: + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC2: pawel 3332 F pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC1: pawel 3332 F pulseaudio + /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p: pawel 3332 F...m pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC0: pawel 3332 F pulseaudio + CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown + CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 + InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-05 (24 days ago) + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223) + MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 15 9510 + NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia + Package: linux (not installed) + ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-41-generic root=UUID=eafa5ba6-fb89-4ef4-91be-71778e4b1577 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-41.46~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19 + RelatedPackageVersions: + linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-41-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-41-generic N/A + linux-firmware 1.201.5 + Tags: impish + Uname: Linux 5.13.0-41-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2022-04-29 (0 days ago) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dip docker input lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo + _MarkForUpload: True + dmi.bios.date: 03/17/2022 + dmi.bios.release: 1.9 + dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. + dmi.bios.version: 1.9.0 + dmi.board.name: 01V4T3 + dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. + dmi.board.version: A01 + dmi.chassis.type: 10 + dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.9.0:bd03/17/2022:br1.9:svnDellInc.:pnXPS159510:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn01V4T3:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:sku0A61: + dmi.product.family: XPS + dmi.product.name: XPS 15 9510 + dmi.product.sku: 0A61 + dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Attachment added: "AlsaInfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585285/+files/AlsaInfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to:
[Bug 1971009] Re: Read-only file system on a battery
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+attachment/5585284/+files/lspci-vnvn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] Re: Read-only file system on a battery
** Attachment added: "version.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+attachment/5585283/+files/version.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971009] [NEW] Read-only file system on a battery
Public bug reported: I have a 2021 Dell XPS 15 (9510) i7-11800H, 16 GB, 512 GB SSD, RTX 3050Ti, Windows 11 Pro. I’ve updated the following components: - replaced the RAM to 2x32 GB - added a brand new Samsung 980 Pro to the second NVMe slot On the secondary NVMe drive, I’ve installed Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. Usually, I use Dell WD19TBS USB-C 180W to supply the power, Internet, external USB keyboard and mouse, and two monitors. When doing so, everything seems to be working perfectly for a long time whether working with Ubuntu or Windows. However, when the laptop is running on battery, I’m observing Ubuntu freezes that happen anywhere between seconds to minutes after a reboot. The keyboard stops responding, the icons go missing, and I’m getting dropped to the terminal with the following messages appearing: __ext4_find_entry:1611 inode #12272199: comm gmain: reading directory lblock 0 __ext4_find_entry:1611 inode #12272199: comm gmain: reading directory lblock 0 And after a few seconds, the following start to appear: system-journald: Failed to write entry (22 items, 750 bytes), ignoring: Read-only file system system-journald: Failed to write entry (22 items, 750 bytes), ignoring: Read-only file system It seems that disconnecting the docking station usually triggers the freeze immediately. When starting from a battery, it usually takes a few minutes before everything freezes. The only way to recover is to do a power long-press. If I do this sequence a few times - boot, wait for hang, power long-press, boot again, usually at some point the Samsung 980 Pro is no longer visible in the BIOS. I need to boot into Windows, wait a bit, reboot again, and the drive appears and it’s possible to boot to Ubuntu What I’ve tried: update Ubuntu to 21.10 update to the latest kernel: 5.13.0-41-generic update all drivers, including BIOS, from Windows using Dell SupportAssistant update Samsung 980 Pro firmware through Samsung Magican enabling Full Power Mode in Samsung Magician check SMART report for Samsung, it’s all clear change GRUB params, currently they look like this: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash pcie_aspm=off nvme_load=YES nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=250 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0" tried also default_ps_max_latency values 0, 5500 fsck from a live boot pendrive It looks like the drive decides to go to a sleep at some point and does not wake up. Windows works well both with docking station and battery, the Samsung NVMe is recognized by Samsung Magician. Any hint what else can I check? Thank you! ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "2022-04-30 05.25.21 (1).jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009/+attachment/5585282/+files/2022-04-30%2005.25.21%20%281%29.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971009 Title: Read-only file system on a battery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1971009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964547]
I assume this bug will be fixed once video decoding has been moved to a utility process (bug 1722051). Until then, MOZ_DISABLE_RDD_SANDBOX=1 environment variable is required to try out experimental VAAPI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964547 Title: [upstream] RDD sandbox prevents HW-accelerated video playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1964547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964547]
*** Bug 1766517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964547 Title: [upstream] RDD sandbox prevents HW-accelerated video playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1964547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964547]
*** Bug 1765824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964547 Title: [upstream] RDD sandbox prevents HW-accelerated video playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1964547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956518] Re: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports
I can say that with the recent update - linux-firmware 1.187.29 - the issues are no longer present. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956518 Title: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1956518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1104476] Re: Network manager cannot connect to WPA2/PEAP/MSCHAPv2 enterprise wifi networks without CA_Certificate, like Eduroam
Still happening on Ubuntu 20.04LTS: uname -a Linux nodename 5.15.15-76051515-generic #202201160435~1642693824~20.04~97db1bb~dev-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 21 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The workaround suggested in original bug description worked for me but I needed to use someone else's computer in order to find the solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1104476 Title: Network manager cannot connect to WPA2/PEAP/MSCHAPv2 enterprise wifi networks without CA_Certificate, like Eduroam To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1104476/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962379] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379/+attachment/5563952/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379 Title: Max routes defaulting to 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1962379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962379] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379/+attachment/5563951/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379 Title: Max routes defaulting to 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1962379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962379] Re: Max routes defaulting to 100
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected impish ** Description changed: When using NetworkManager via GUI to configure a Fortinet SSL-VPN (network-manager-fortisslvpn) connection, the configuration options do not include an option for "Max Routes", as you would see in other packages (network-manager-openvpn for example). My work provides 300+ routes upon connecting but only 100 of these are being configured. If I connect using openfortivpn package natively via CLI, it adds all 300+ routes and works as expected. If I add max-routes=500 to the [vpn] section of the config (found in /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/workvpn.nmconnection), the whole connection errors out. Either need an option to override the limitation with max routes all together, or have an option to specify the max during configuration. System information: OS: Kubuntu 21.10 network-manager: 1.32.12-0ubuntu1 network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.2.10-0ubuntu2 openfortivpn: 1.15.0-1 ** cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=21.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=impish DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 21.10" + --- + ProblemType: Bug + ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71 + Architecture: amd64 + CasperMD5CheckResult: pass + CurrentDesktop: KDE + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 + InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-01-27 (30 days ago) + InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012) + Package: network-manager-fortisslvpn 1.2.10-0ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-30.33-generic 5.13.19 + Tags: impish + Uname: Linux 5.13.0-30-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo + _MarkForUpload: True ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379/+attachment/5563950/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379 Title: Max routes defaulting to 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1962379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962379] [NEW] Max routes defaulting to 100
Public bug reported: When using NetworkManager via GUI to configure a Fortinet SSL-VPN (network-manager-fortisslvpn) connection, the configuration options do not include an option for "Max Routes", as you would see in other packages (network-manager-openvpn for example). My work provides 300+ routes upon connecting but only 100 of these are being configured. If I connect using openfortivpn package natively via CLI, it adds all 300+ routes and works as expected. If I add max-routes=500 to the [vpn] section of the config (found in /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/workvpn.nmconnection), the whole connection errors out. Either need an option to override the limitation with max routes all together, or have an option to specify the max during configuration. System information: OS: Kubuntu 21.10 network-manager: 1.32.12-0ubuntu1 network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.2.10-0ubuntu2 openfortivpn: 1.15.0-1 ** cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=21.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=impish DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 21.10" ** Affects: network-manager-fortisslvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962379 Title: Max routes defaulting to 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1962379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109943]
This slipped between other bugs, thanks for the ping. I'm not sure there's anything else to do here as I can't reproduce this issue anymore. Tested on 91.5.1 and on my mac the usage remains around 5% without spiking anymore. Also, if I'm not wrong, this is not a XUL element anymore but it's not a standard HTML progressbar. Can anyone else still reproduce it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109943 Title: Thunderbird: high CPU usage from progress bars To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/109943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1741074]
*** Bug 1738488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074 Title: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1741074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956518] Re: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports
Tried to get apport-collect log via https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1958512 but only a popup with "no additional information has been gathered" shows up, will try again in the evening / tomorrow -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956518 Title: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1956518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958512] [NEW] linux-firmware 1.187.24 or linux kernel 5.4.0-92 kills USB ports
Public bug reported: Report for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/+bug/1956518/ in a state where USB ports don't work ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958512 Title: linux-firmware 1.187.24 or linux kernel 5.4.0-92 kills USB ports To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1958512/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956518] Re: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports
I have the same problem with Dell Latitude E7440, Ubuntu 20.04, after an update to kernel 5.4.0-92, and having linux-firmware 1.187.24. 1) I'm using a UGreen USB Switch to switch between the inputs of keyboard, mouse and audio between two stations 2) After the kernel and linux-firmware upgrade I did a reboot, the system took much longer to start (console shown "failed to enumerate USB devices"), when it did boot external keyboards and mouse wasn't working 3) Pluging in any device directly to laptop's USB port does not work 4) I've managed to get the external keyboard and mouse to work by disabling the Bluetooth in Ubuntu settings and rebooting back to 5.4.0-91 (worked via USB Switch) 5) However after another reboot to 5.4.0-91, USB ports stopped working again -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956518 Title: linux-firmware 1.187.24 may crash USB ports To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1956518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953210] [NEW] package libvdpau1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64
Public bug reported: not a programmer ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libvdpau1 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-41.45~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CompositorRunning: None Date: Fri Dec 3 22:36:48 2021 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: focal DistroVariant: ubuntu DuplicateSignature: package:libvdpau1:(not installed) Unpacking libvdpau1:amd64 (1.3-1ubuntu2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-CYOEuz/155-libvdpau1_1.3-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64 GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 770] [10de:1184] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd GK104 [GeForce GTX 770] [1458:3603] InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-25 (69 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) MachineType: ASUS All Series ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-41-generic root=UUID=4e954e5c-691e-4c0b-a835-8de78a6f578d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: libvdpau Title: package libvdpau1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/05/2014 dmi.bios.release: 4.6 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1505 dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: MAXIMUS VI HERO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1505:bd06/05/2014:br4.6:svnASUS:pnAllSeries:pvrSystemVersion:skuAll:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnMAXIMUSVIHERO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.family: ASUS MB dmi.product.name: All Series dmi.product.sku: All dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~20.04.2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.5 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20200226-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1 ** Affects: libvdpau (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal need-duplicate-check package-conflict ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953210 Title: package libvdpau1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvdpau/+bug/1953210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #88) > (In reply to daniel from comment #87) > > This is not working in v7.2.2.2 > > > > The key is not being properly stored, and the UI leaves a LOT to be desired. > > > > You may find that the way the tool rclone (rclone.org) handles this > > authentication is much more graceful than the current solution. > > > > The dialog box is also misleading about what, when (at which step), and > > where to paste the key from the OAuth process. > > > > There has to be a better way for users to be able to use this feature. > > hello, > Please read comment 82 to allow storing the key I have, but it is extremely user-unfriendly and unless you are looking up this bug report, you would never know how to do it. Even then, the notes in comment #87 are not the complete instructions. Basically, this method is a dirty workaround of a patch job that needs to be truly fixed in both the backend and the UI. The method used to get and capture the key is not graceful, and the UI is plain incorrect. I would fix it myself if it was something that had the skill to do (I love open source software for that!), but I do not feel comfortable in my skill level making those modifications. Instead, I have pointed this very skilled and talented community to another piece of open-source software that has done a very good job at tackling this issue for not only Google Drive, but also for numerous other cloud storage vendors. Their code base is mature, and the capabilities of that tool complement what users of this project need. In reality, the project might even look at integrating that tool's functionality into this one, similar to how other modules have become standard within the software. Spell checking is one function that comes to mind. I see this as an opportunity to potentially have one community help another, giving them both a way to learn from the other's work and experience. Isn't that one of the main benefits of being open source? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
This is not working in v7.2.2.2 The key is not being properly stored, and the UI leaves a LOT to be desired. You may find that the way the tool rclone (rclone.org) handles this authentication is much more graceful than the current solution. The dialog box is also misleading about what, when (at which step), and where to paste the key from the OAuth process. There has to be a better way for users to be able to use this feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1741074]
> S2(Serious) Major functionality/product severely impaired and a satisfactory workaround does not exist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074 Title: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1741074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940707]
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1630251 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940707 Title: [upstream] Maximized window becomes a mess at next startup after manually choosing to restore previous session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1940707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946599]
*** Bug 1737737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946599 Title: Firefox break when returning from console with wayland (nvidia) on ubuntu 21.10 beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1946599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946599]
*** Bug 1732582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946599 Title: Firefox break when returning from console with wayland (nvidia) on ubuntu 21.10 beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1946599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946599]
(In reply to Darkspirit from comment #1) > $ sudo snap remove firefox; sudo snap install firefox --channel=latest/beta; > snap run firefox https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html > > firefox (beta) 93.0b9-1 from Mozilla✓ installed > > broken Debian Testing, Gnome Wayland, Intel sudo snap remove firefox; sudo snap install firefox --channel=latest/beta EGL/Wayland works: snap run firefox https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html EGL/Xwayland works: DISABLE_WAYLAND=1 snap run firefox https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946599 Title: Firefox break when returning from console with wayland (nvidia) on ubuntu 21.10 beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1946599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871644]
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #26) > If we do want to do the cleanup described above, we might need a new media > query which determines this (but it should definitely not have `csd` in the > name, since it is not about csd at all). So I'd rather clean up the existing > one since it's confusing at best. > And in all cases this patch stack doesn't regress behavior (and improves it in the obvious cases). So I'd say comment 25 should be a separate bug? Yes. I only remembered that a query like `-moz-gtk-csd-transparent- background` might be useful to allow Xshape removal (if it is desired). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871644 Title: Top corners of Firefox windows have weird black protrusions from the rounded edges To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1871644/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871644]
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #20) Non-composited X11 (the legacy variant of X11: i3, KDE with manually disabled compositor, etc.) does not support transparency. Everything that would usually be transparent/alpha is just black/opaque. Menus and window corners had [shadows on black background](https://bug1479135.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8995686) (=fat black borders). The autoscroll icon was a [black square with a white circle](https://bug1649246.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9160184) in it. [XShapeCombineMask](https://searchfox.org/mozilla- central/search?q=XShapeCombineMask=) is implemented for software rendering only. Firefox creates a stencil (like a cookie cutter) of where transparency needs to get cut off. X11 then applies this stencil on every frame. The outer shadow of a rounded main menu, addon widget or [window titlebar](https://searchfox.org/mozilla- central/rev/37373cdeed20695af1ff1fd090f0736d9bf15e65/widget/gtk/nsWindow.cpp#6729,6793) has transparency, so it gets cut off by X11, leaving a rounded widget without shadow. XShapeCombineMask is not implemented for hardware rendering. That's why SW WR is enforced for menus, addons and autoscroll icon on non-composited X11 to make use of XShapeCombineMask while the main window is still using OpenGL. XShapeCombineMask * caused problems on [Mutter](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/37373cdeed20695af1ff1fd090f0736d9bf15e65/widget/gtk/nsWindow.cpp#9084) back then * crashes the GPU process on Nvidia: bug 1730991 * causes performance problems according to the Chromium bugtracker: bug 1733094 comment 18,https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1198080 Could XShapeCombineMask be removed and instead menus and the autoscroll icon loose their border-radius (become rectangular) and loose their shadow (to avoid black background) if gdk_screen_is_composited() is false? IIUC, that would reduce code complexity, improve stability and performance. A rectangular autoscroll icon on non-composited X11 would be noticeable. But users choose non-composited X11 to get more performance than with composited X11. Considering this as well, it doesn't make sense to use XShapeCombineMask which contradicts their intent and causes above problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871644 Title: Top corners of Firefox windows have weird black protrusions from the rounded edges To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1871644/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871644]
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #17) > Created attachment 9246290 > Bug 1509931 - Remove -moz-gtk-csd-transparent-background. r=stransky > > > We always use alpha visual for WebRender KDE with disabled compositor, i3, etc. use alpha visual, but it's not transparent. Could -moz-gtk-csd-transparent-background be defined with gdk_screen_is_composited() and be used to forbid outer border-radius + outer shadow of main menu/addon/etc. widgets to remove any Xshape usage (bug 1730991 comment 6)? According to the Chromium bugtracker, Xshape also causes performance problems (bug 1730991 comment 7). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871644 Title: Top corners of Firefox windows have weird black protrusions from the rounded edges To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1871644/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945916] [NEW] unattended root privileges on changes of recently-used.xbel
Public bug reported: I changed owner and group of ~/.local/share/recently-used.xbel to root:root and set the mod-flags to disable writing. Once I open a new file with nautilus, the owner got changed back to user:user and mod-flags back to defaults, i.e. an unattended change with root-privilegs ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945916 Title: unattended root privileges on changes of recently-used.xbel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1945916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933996] Re: Alt-tab stops switching windows [JS ERROR: TypeError: window is null _createWindowClone@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/altTab.js:29:27]
This bug should be fixed with https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2003 I cannot reproduce the issue anymore when this change is applied on my system. Can someone initiate that this fix is backported into Ubuntu 21.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933996 Title: Alt-tab stops switching windows [JS ERROR: TypeError: window is null _createWindowClone@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/altTab.js:29:27] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1933996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940417]
Ubuntu and Fedora ship an untested pre-Nightly feature. (MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND = bug 1543600) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940417 Title: On Wayland toolbar menus are sometimes invisible/flickering To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1940417/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943838] [NEW] libreoffice install should not use relative sym-link
Public bug reported: # lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 21.04 Release:21.04 Codename: hirsute /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice is symlinked twice into /usr/bin as libreoffice and soffice ** root@agnes ** /usr/bin ** Thu Sep 16 11:09:37 # ls -la *office lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 Sep 16 10:56 libreoffice -> ../lib/libreoffice/program/soffice -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53 Aug 2 01:31 loffice lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 Sep 16 11:05 soffice -> ../lib/libreoffice/program/soffice However, soffice is a shell script which derefs the symlink and then fails to find "../lib" If one recreates the symlinks with full paths, all is well ** root@agnes ** /usr/bin ** Thu Sep 16 11:16:37 # ls -la *office lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 Sep 16 10:56 libreoffice -> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53 Aug 2 01:31 loffice lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 Sep 16 11:05 soffice -> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: libreoffice -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943838 Title: libreoffice install should not use relative sym-link To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1943838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1770587]
Calendar is disabled by default on first start up, and it's now possible to use TB without an email account and avoid getting prompted at every startup. So yeah, this issue should be pretty impossible to reproduce. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770587 Title: creation of new email account impossible in thunderbird To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1770587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
One question: is it possible to call another MIME handler instead of Lightning? That was my original bug back in the dark ages, back when there were dinosaurs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
Since TB78 Lightning is always "installed" (integrated into TB), so this bug here can be closed. There is also bug 760412 which is about only showing the last text/calendar part of multipart/alternative. To make it clear: This bug here: Invite not showing when no Lightning installed. Bug 760412: text/html part not shown in multipart/alternative if text/calendar comes last. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
FIXED in TB 78 be integrating Lightning, so it is never "not installed". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
Ok, should there be a separate bug (again) for that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
*** Bug 783603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938354] [NEW] I cant change display options at all besides native panel
Public bug reported: Screen would go black if i change it to 1600x900 or anything thats not 1080p. This may be tied to how discord cant screenshare at all besides its own application. Im guessing you guys haft to make a fix for vega 6 drivers. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Wed Jul 28 18:59:33 2021 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: hirsute DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical GraphicsCard: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636] (rev c3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Renoir [17aa:3f1a] InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-26 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420) MachineType: LENOVO 81X2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-25-generic root=UUID=837b4392-e002-4580-960c-f4bb298d9daf ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/16/2021 dmi.bios.release: 1.35 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: EECN35WW dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0J40709 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 31 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: IdeaPad Flex 5 14ARE05 dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.21 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrEECN35WW:bd04/16/2021:br1.35:efr1.21:svnLENOVO:pn81X2:pvrIdeaPadFlex514ARE05:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40709WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct31:cvrIdeaPadFlex514ARE05: dmi.product.family: IdeaPad Flex 5 14ARE05 dmi.product.name: 81X2 dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81X2_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad Flex 5 14ARE05 dmi.product.version: IdeaPad Flex 5 14ARE05 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-1ubuntu1~h~mesarc3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.0~rc2+git2107262116.bfefde2248f~h~mesarc5 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1.1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute third-party-packages ubuntu wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938354 Title: I cant change display options at all besides native panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1938354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938225] [NEW] package libcomerr2:amd64 1.42.13-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libcomerr2:amd64 is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Cannot update ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libcomerr2:amd64 1.42.13-1ubuntu1.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18 AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu14 Architecture: amd64 CrashReports: 600:0:117:384116:2021-07-27 14:44:15.377838850 -0600:2021-07-27 14:44:16.377838850 -0600:/var/crash/libcomerr2:amd64.0.crash Date: Tue Jul 27 14:44:16 2021 Dependencies: gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu11.3 libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1 DpkgTerminalLog: dpkg: error processing package libcomerr2:amd64 (--configure): package libcomerr2:amd64 is already installed and configured ErrorMessage: package libcomerr2:amd64 is already installed and configured InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-27 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.7 apt 1.2.35 SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package libcomerr2:amd64 1.42.13-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libcomerr2:amd64 is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: already-installed amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938225 Title: package libcomerr2:amd64 1.42.13-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libcomerr2:amd64 is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1938225/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1935783] [NEW] package python3-cryptography 1.2.3-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: would not install updates ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: python3-cryptography 1.2.3-1ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-28.32~16.04.2-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-28-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jul 11 15:16:59 2021 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-11 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170801) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.7 apt 1.2.35 SourcePackage: python-cryptography Title: package python3-cryptography 1.2.3-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: python-cryptography (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935783 Title: package python3-cryptography 1.2.3-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cryptography/+bug/1935783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1931722] Re: software-properties-gtk generates python errors
I'm attaching the contents of sudo systemctl status as a text file. It appears that I can actually launch software-properties, but only as sudo. The direct link in the Ubuntu menu won't work. It seems it is more related to dbus, but I am not sure. ** Attachment added: "systemctl.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1931722/+attachment/5505052/+files/systemctl.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931722 Title: software-properties-gtk generates python errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1931722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
