[Bug 1389513] [NEW] nvidia-331-uvm 331.89-0ubuntu5: nvidia-331-uvm kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: no other information to provide ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nvidia-331-uvm 331.89-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-24.32-generic 3.16.4 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.16.0-25-generic Date: Wed Nov 5 06:40:35 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-21 (621 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) PackageVersion: 331.89-0ubuntu5 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331-uvm 331.89-0ubuntu5: nvidia-331-uvm kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2014-10-24 (11 days ago) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389513 Title: nvidia-331-uvm 331.89-0ubuntu5: nvidia-331-uvm kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1389513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa
@stephen-skinner on my setup, this results in the following error message : yann@Tregor:~$ sudo apt-get purge ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait E: Impossible de trouver le paquet ppa - which approx. means Unable to find the ppa packet I tried again something with ppa-purge, and it results with the same message : yann@Tregor:~$ sudo ppa-purge xorg-edgers Updating packages lists PPA to be removed: xorg-edgers ppa Note: Not removing ppa-purge package Package revert list generated: libcuda1-304- libdrm-dev:amd64/saucy libdrm-intel1:amd64/saucy libdrm-intel1:i386/saucy libdrm-nouveau2:amd64/saucy libdrm-nouveau2:i386/saucy libdrm-radeon1:amd64/saucy libdrm-radeon1:i386/saucy libdrm2:amd64/saucy libdrm2:i386/saucy libegl1-mesa:amd64/saucy libegl1-mesa-drivers:amd64/saucy libgbm1:amd64/saucy libgl1-mesa-dev/saucy libgl1-mesa-dri:amd64/saucy libgl1-mesa-dri:i386/saucy libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64/saucy libgl1-mesa-glx:i386/saucy libglamor0:amd64/saucy libglapi-mesa:amd64/saucy libglapi-mesa:i386/saucy libgles2-mesa:amd64/saucy libllvm3.4:amd64/saucy libllvm3.4:i386/saucy libopenvg1-mesa:amd64/saucy libwayland-client0:amd64/saucy libwayland-cursor0:amd64/saucy libwayland-egl1-mesa:amd64- libwayland-server0:amd64/saucy libxatracker2:amd64- libxcb-dri2-0:amd64/saucy libxcb-dri2-0:i386/saucy libxcb-dri2-0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb-dri3-0:amd64- libxcb-dri3-0:i386- libxcb-dri3-dev:amd64- libxcb-glx0:amd64/saucy libxcb-glx0:i386/saucy libxcb-glx0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb-present-dev:amd64- libxcb-present0:amd64- libxcb-present0:i386- libxcb-randr0:amd64/saucy libxcb-randr0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb-render0:amd64/saucy libxcb-render0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb-shape0:amd64/saucy libxcb-shape0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb-shm0:amd64/saucy libxcb-sync-dev:amd64- libxcb-sync1:amd64- libxcb-sync1:i386- libxcb-xfixes0:amd64/saucy libxcb-xfixes0-dev:amd64/saucy libxcb1:amd64/saucy libxcb1:i386/saucy libxcb1-dev:amd64/saucy libxshmfence-dev:amd64- libxshmfence1:amd64- libxshmfence1:i386- mesa-common-dev/saucy nvidia-304/saucy nvidia-current/saucy nvidia-libopencl1-304- nvidia-opencl-icd-304- xserver-common/saucy xserver-xephyr/saucy xserver-xorg-core/saucy xserver-xorg-video-ati/saucy xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl- xserver-xorg-video-intel/saucy xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/saucy xserver-xorg-video-radeon/saucy xserver-xorg-video-vmware/saucy Disabling xorg-edgers PPA from /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xorg-edgers-ppa-saucy.list Updating packages lists Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait xserver-common est déjà la plus récente version disponible. xserver-xorg-core est déjà la plus récente version disponible. xserver-xephyr est déjà la plus récente version disponible. xserver-xephyr passé en « installé manuellement ». Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libdrm-dev » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libdrm-intel1 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [i386]) pour « libdrm-intel1:i386 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libdrm-nouveau2 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [i386]) pour « libdrm-nouveau2:i386 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libdrm-radeon1 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [i386]) pour « libdrm-radeon1:i386 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libdrm2 » Version choisie « 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [i386]) pour « libdrm2:i386 » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libegl1-mesa » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libegl1-mesa-drivers » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libgbm1 » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libgl1-mesa-dev » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libgl1-mesa-dri » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [i386]) pour « libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libgl1-mesa-glx » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [i386]) pour « libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 » Version choisie « 0.5.1-0ubuntu4.2 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy-updates [amd64]) pour « libglamor0 » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libglapi-mesa » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [i386]) pour « libglapi-mesa:i386 » Version choisie « 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour « libgles2-mesa » Version choisie « 1:3.4~svn183914-1ubuntu1 » (Ubuntu:13.10/saucy [amd64]) pour «
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa
@tasgo : I just followed the procedure explained at askubuntu, without success : the upgrade still fails with the same error message... :/ @michael-ransbottom : I suspected that, but even after adding the xorg-edgers PPA like this : ' ' sudo add-apt-repository ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install package name ' ' ... when trying to install the 'xorg-server' package, I still get messages like Impossible to find the packet xorg-server. HOWEVER I decided to remove the libkms1 packet, and then after reactivating the xorg-edgers repository, the ppa-purge seems to run ok... I will take you informed if I succeed in upgrading 13.10 to 14.04 after that... :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Title: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa
Hi ! I face the same issue for upgrading 13.10 to 14.04... I fiddled around the repositories, and upgrade commands, with no success... Is there a straightforward process to get this working ? :/ Bye, Yann -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Title: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa
In fact I tried : sudo add-apt-repository ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install xorg-server sudo apt-get upgrade sudo ppa-purge xorg-edgers ... and at the last command gives this message : ' Certains paquets ne peuvent être installés. Ceci peut signifier que vous avez demandé l'impossible, ou bien, si vous utilisez la distribution unstable, que certains paquets n'ont pas encore été créés ou ne sont pas sortis d'Incoming. L'information suivante devrait vous aider à résoudre la situation : Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites : libdrm-dev : Dépend: libkms1 (= 2.4.46-1ubuntu1) mais 2.4.46+git20130910.58d00888-0ubuntu0sarvatt devra être installé E: Impossible de corriger les problèmes, des paquets défectueux sont en mode « garder en l'état ». /usr/sbin/ppa-purge: ligne 180: aptitude : commande introuvable Warning: Something went wrong, packages may not have been reverted ' I am not sure of what the good move is... :? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Title: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311143] [NEW] Impossible to upgrade my 13.10 to 14.04
Public bug reported: Hello, I deactivated third-parties repositories on my 13.10, but when i try performing the upgrade to 14.04, an error is shown after the Defining new software repositories (translation from french, so the label may not be exact) phase I get the following error message : ' ' Impossible d'évaluer la mise à niveau Un problème insoluble est survenu lors de la préparation de la mise à niveau. Ceci peut-être dû à : * la mise à niveau vers une version de développement d'Ubuntu ; * la version de développement d'Ubuntu est actuellement utilisée ; * des paquets logiciels non officiels, non fournis par Ubuntu. Si rien de tout cela ne s'applique, veuillez signaler ce bogue en utilisant la commande 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' dans un terminal. ' ' ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.205.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-20.34-generic 3.11.10.6 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Tue Apr 22 16:14:49 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-21 (424 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2014-04-22 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade package-from-proposed saucy third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311143 Title: Impossible to upgrade my 13.10 to 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1311143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95853] Re: Add an option to get a confirmation dialog before deleting files in Nautilus
@mac_v : don't worry, I was just kidding... :) What I mean is even if all of us on Launchpad are some kind of power users, some of us are more prone to say things like : I'm a grown up person and don't want to be treated by this machine like an imbecile by continually being reminded of the same damn thing each and every time. ... and some others tell thinks like : I did loose some files just because I hit the delete key accidentally(reads: *without even noticing I did*). How useful is the trashbin when it contains things that you are not even aware are inside? You empty your trashbin and voila, your data are gone! This is incredible. Two kinds of users, but a single OS to make them happy... :) -- Add an option to get a confirmation dialog before deleting files in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95853] Re: Add an option to get a confirmation dialog before deleting files in Nautilus
@all : this is fun stuff for an HMI designer/UX specialist... Indeed, an excellent example case for a UX course : how to make a choice between all these point of view, and make everyone happy ? IMHO, there's no way to make everyone happy, as people have antinomic opinions. It seems we have 3 classes of users, here : - power users who claim they master the machine, and don't want to be bothered by confirmation popup when they pushed the Del key - I'm responsible and educated, I know what I do - power users who recognize they may make mistakes, sometimes - I'm human, error is human, I want to be protected - lambda users who come from other horizons , who install a vanilla Karmic - I just want a computer that runs ok. IMHO, the best compromise for these profiles is to have confirmation before moving to trash and confirmation before emptying the trash = on, by default, at first install + make it customizable in some configuration menu, for masters of the machine. This will be consistent for both lambda users (who are used to be asked for confirmation, notably on Windows), power users who may make mistakes, and masters of the machine are skilled enough to go and uncheck the checbox if they don't want to be asked for confirmation... BTW : I *know* speaking about Windows as a reference sounds annoying/exasperating to some of you. But as a UX specialist, I have to say something : eventhough standards are not everything, in HMI design, they are really helpful. Making things in a different way is great, when there's a good reason to do so, and no reason to stick to the standard. But it appears that in our case, the presence of a confirmation popup is argued : there are pros and cons. In that context, sticking to the standard + making things customizable seems to be a good approach. For a lot of people, Windows is the reference : most of them started using computers with Windows, and Windows runs 95% of computers. Beside of this, there are well known usability rules in HMI design (e.g. Bastien Scapin principles) that say errors shall be managed, and notably by protecting the user against errors he may perform. Forgetting this kind of rules in HundredPapers (a project which aims at improving Ubuntu's usability...) would appear as counter-productive. -- Add an option to get a confirmation dialog before deleting files in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 23293] Re: Nautilus windows should close on unmount
+1 on Sebastien as well. What about my suggestion ? (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/23293/comments/20) -- Nautilus windows should close on unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389926] Re: Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can
@Sebastien : the screenshot behaviour seems a design decision and not a bug True, but as we speak about usability issues, not only technical bugs are in the scope... users usually don't care about things out of their directory and showing those by default would be confusing Maybe. Or maybe not. We could also say Users usually like to know where they are when navigating, and showing them they are in the home directory, itself located at the root of the filesystem would help a lot... In fact only user tests could really answer. But as far as I am concerned, i'd prefer to see the full path in the breadcrumb. -- Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389926] Re: Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can
Ivanka, what do you think ? -- Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a test... Michael Rooney a écrit : On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: So, Ivanka: +1 on the short username! I also prefer this solution, glad to hear it is the one being considered. The user is very likely to understand and recognize their own username and it doesn't need to be translated. Plus it will be consistent with the actual directory structure of /home/username! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpD4aQACgkQKPYCdhn2v2wjBQCghMQSdFKZLq24Wa+B3y5QLNJj sqUAnA32f14BwG5IjOoaVxhuBbFkeOAg =M8Ue -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Home Folder has 3 different names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 23293] Re: Nautilus windows should close on unmount
Hello, Except maybe in contexts where you have a lot of windows, and you have to search among your taskbar to ensure none of your windows is the one corresponding to the volume you just unmounted... Martin Lettner a écrit : confirming this. would be just nice if nautilus would close the tab (or window if there is only that one tab) when the media is unmountet. also the user would have a definite feedback that the media was safely removed from the system! just think about a very common scenario: - plug in a usb memory drive - do stuff with it - click remove/unmount somewhere - after some seconds the file manager window disappears so also the memory drive can be removed very intuitive i think... was this reported upstream already? -- Nautilus windows should close on unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369787] Re: Disable file system check at boot time
Hello, I tried to define a solution that would prevent laptop users from being blocked due to a read-only filesystem, but still allow the fsck sequence to be performed at shutdown time, so that users can quickly boot theier computer... My suggestion is : At boot time : - Display a timer and ask the user whether he wants to perform a filesystem check (wording TBD...). Default option : no fsck At shutdown time : - test whether a fsck is needed If YES - test whether the computer runs on batteries, if YES -skip fsck if NO, - perform fsck if NO - shutdown -- Disable file system check at boot time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391194] Re: Pasting a path should be possible without prealable switch to text mode
Hi Sebastien, I know the Copy/Paste action is *possible*, but what I meant is that it's not as easy as it should be : one has to switch into text mode (either by clicking on the notepad-like icon or pressing Ctrl+L. This should be possible using a single action (Paste) with no prealable action. Moreover, shortcuts are ok for expert users, but I think we shall not rely on that to ensure a good usability : most people do know Ctrl+C (eventhough lots of basic users prefer using contextual menus), but I'd bet my hand that 90% users do not know Ctrl+L. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Pasting a path should be possible without prealable switch to text mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95853] Re: Delete file in Nautlus - no warning
Mac_v, Sebastien, Holger, I understand your point of view, and I partly agree with you : basically, I think the way Nautilus runs is good. Deleting files is possible without asking confirmation each time, and asking confirmation only before the real deletion is really fluent... BUT, what makes me say that eventhough I like current Nautilus way of behaving, I'd prefer it to be changed is the discrepancy between Nautilus/Gnome and other major OS'es. Both Windows MacOS ask confirmation before both file deletion and trash emptying. Most people expect a confirmation at this point. For better usability, we shall meet this expectation AND make this feature customizable so that people like you (and probably me) can deactivate the confirmation before file move to trash. Here's the way it's implemented in Vista : http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=595 -- Delete file in Nautlus - no warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389926] Re: Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can
On my Jaunty fresh install, I only have to open any item in the Places menu, and I get a shortened path (behaviour visible in Capture-3.png, instead of the desired behaviour, visible in Capture-4.png) ** Attachment added: Current behaviour http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28289869/Capture-3.png -- Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389926] Re: Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can
Here's the desired behaviour ** Attachment added: Capture-4.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28289895/Capture-4.png -- Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389035] Re: Strange dialog during upgrade
@mac_v : ok sorry, I focused on the usability issue part of the project, and was not aware that paper cuts only focus on a fresh install... Sorry again... ** Also affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Strange dialog during upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 23293] Re: Nautilus windows should close on unmount
Errr... I see I'm not in the majority here, but eyh, I can still give my opinion... ;) Two major principles in HMI ergonomics are : - to let the user control the GUI, - to provide users with feedback so that they remain conscious of the system state. It seems to me that applying this principle here would not lead to redirecting the window to a new place (so that the user keeps control about what happens), but to display a message telling him the /media/usb_blahblah has been unmounted/ejected/whatever. This way, if he mounts a new media, the content will be displayed in the same window. -- Nautilus windows should close on unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389926] Re: Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can
+1 on this issue... -- Nautilus browser's pathbar doesn't display the entire path, even when it can https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
@Alex French If such a generic name is no longer defined, references to it in discussion will be inconsistent. Do you really think so ? Imagine we're on phone. If I want to tell you to go to /home/alex (e.g.), I just have to tell you Open the Places menu, and select your folder. If there's an item called Alex's documents, it will be fine... Another generic alternative, which would make sense, would be to go for a... Windows cloning : My documents. -- Home Folder has 3 different names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390677] Re: Hidden line during install wizard
Or maybe split the screen into 2. It implies adding 1 step to the installation process, but it would also allow more air to breathe, into this one. Maybe the computer name would be candidate to be a dedicate step ? This way everything in this step would concern the user (name, password, auto connect...). -- Hidden line during install wizard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389934] Re: During install, make the Automatic login option the default choice
Hi, Grofaty... Here's my argument : I did not recommend using *no password*, but *allowing people not to type their password when login*. This means their password would still remain applicable when sudoing : the system is not left without protection... My recommendation addressesthe case of people who use Ubuntu @home, who have Windows Xp as a reference, and don't mind about security risks linked to physical access to their station. Business people will probably have their PCs installed by qualified people, who will only have to tick the checkbox during the install... -- During install, make the Automatic login option the default choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389934 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
IMHO, the issue is that users both use shortcuts from the menu, and have to browse the filesystem. If we use Home as a shortcut label in the menu, they may think that browsing to /home using Nautilus will lead them to the same place as the Home shortcut - usability issue. BTW, making a bridge between Windows approach and Ubuntu/Gnome one may be a good idea, to make new Ubuntu users' life easier : the My documents concept is very well known and understood. The only way to addresse both of these issues (help users to make a link between the menu shortcut and their filesystem ~ directory + be wording-compatible with Windows) , is to use both the username and documents term in the shortcut label. This would give Yann's documents, for example. -- Home Folder has 3 different names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
IMHO, the issue is that users both use shortcuts from the menu, and have to browse the filesystem. If we use Home as a shortcut label in the menu, they may think that browsing to /home using Nautilus will lead them to the same place as the Home shortcut - usability issue. BTW, making a bridge between Windows approach and Ubuntu/Gnome one may be a good idea, to make new Ubuntu users' life easier : the My documents concept is very well known and understood. The only way to addresse both of these issues (help users to make a link between the menu shortcut and their filesystem ~ directory + be wording-compatible with Windows) , is to use both the username and documents term in the shortcut label. This would give Yann's documents, for example. -- Home Folder has 3 different names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs