[Bug 642347] Re: Segmentation fault in cc1plus when compiling witty library
** Branch linked: lp:~yao-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/4.4-fix-647597 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- Segmentation fault in cc1plus when compiling witty library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647597] Re: Internal compiler error while building package 'witty'
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- Internal compiler error while building package 'witty' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642347] Re: Segmentation fault in cc1plus when compiling witty library
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) -- Segmentation fault in cc1plus when compiling witty library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635409] Re: armel ICE gcc-4.4
Committed to linaro gcc 4.4 branch too. -- armel ICE gcc-4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647597] Re: Internal compiler error while building package 'witty'
Patch is in branch lp:~yao-codesourcery/gcc-linaro/4.4-fix-647597. Proposed to merge, and being reviewed. -- Internal compiler error while building package 'witty' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647597] Re: Internal compiler error while building package 'witty'
I get a reduced test case for this bug. Attached here.
segv fault is cause by following code snip in cp/mangle.c
static tree
mangle_decl_string (const tree decl)
{
...
input_location = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl); // input_location is ZERO
...
write_mangled_name (decl, true); // Segv fault is triggers in child
calls.
}
This piece of code is backported from gcc 4.5 to fix GCC PR42748,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748
The decl is __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, and input_location on FSF 4.5 is NOT
zero.DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION should return non-zero value for
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__, so that it could be mangled.
Still investigating it.
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #42748
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748
** Attachment added: "reduced test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/+bug/647597/+attachment/1652552/+files/WAbstractArea.C
--
Internal compiler error while building package 'witty'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647597] Re: Internal compiler error while building package 'witty'
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) -- Internal compiler error while building package 'witty' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635409] Re: armel ICE gcc-4.4
** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) => (unassigned) ** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) -- armel ICE gcc-4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635409] Re: armel ICE gcc-4.4
** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) ** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- armel ICE gcc-4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635199] Re: [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7
It is not a toolchain issue here. In H5detect.c:ALIGNMENT, a testing to
mis-aligned access is performed, as below,
*((TYPE*)(_buf+align_g[_ano])) = _val; /*possible SIGBUS or SEGSEGV*/
\
_val2 = *((TYPE*)(_buf+align_g[_ano])); /*possible SIGBUS or SEGSEGV*/
\
and SIGBUS and SIGSEGV is handled. However, on ARM, at least in thumb2, SIGILL
is generated. This can be verified by this small case,
int main()
{
char c[20];
int i =0; float f;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
printf ("address is %x\n", (unsigned int) &c[i]);
f = *((float*) &c[i]);
}
return 0;
}
$ gcc align.c -o align
$ ./align
address is be8ebc20
address is be8ebc21
Illegal instruction
However, everything is OK with -march=armv5t,
$ gcc -march=armv5t align.c -o align
$ ./align
address is bedfbc20
address is bedfbc21
address is bedfbc22
address is bedfbc23
To fix this problem here, we may can either modify source code of hdf5
to handle SIGILL, or change kernel to use SIGBUS for unalinged access
instead of SIGILL (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-
kernel/msg93601.html).
--
[armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635199] Re: [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7
** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Qi (yao-codesourcery) -- [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636229] Re: armel build failure (armv7 specific?)
Reduced test case to gcc is here,
void coq_interprete()
{
register int accu asm("r7");
accu = 0;
}
# gcc-4.5 -S /home/yao/test.c
/home/yao/test.c: In function 'coq_interprete':
/home/yao/test.c:6: error: r7 cannot be used in asm here
No error if compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer
# gcc-4.5 -fomit-frame-pointer -S /home/yao/test.c
In thumb mode, r7 is used as frame pointer register. AFAIK, it is
correct to report an error like this. Fix to this problem can be either
using another register for variable accu on thumb mode or add -fomit-
frame-pointer in gcc commandline.
--
armel build failure (armv7 specific?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636229
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635409] Re: armel ICE gcc-4.4
This bug was reported upstreams, and has been fixed in gcc 4.6. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787 This bug might be introduced to linaro gcc 4.5 when we backport patches from gcc 4.6. Backport patch to in my local linaro 4.5 tree, and see ICE goes away. $ ./install/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ -g -O2 -Wall -pedantic -fno- pic -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 -fno-stack-protector -c ../perf-main.ii ** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #44787 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787 -- armel ICE gcc-4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
I can reproduce it on imx51, but can't reproduce it on other two boards. Both openjdk and eglibc are the same on these three boards, openjdk-6-jre-headless: 6b18-1.8-2ubuntu2 eglibc:2.12.1-0ubuntu3 Run 'java -version', and here is the result, imx51-1 2.6.31-203-gee1fdae SEGV 2.6.33.5-l3 OK pavo1 2.6.33.7 OK Failure on imx51 is still the same as reported in this bug. # java -version Segmentation fault # strace -o 1.log java -version mmap2(0x4049a000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x64) = 0x4049a000 close(3)= 0 mprotect(0x4049a000, 4096, PROT_READ) = 0 mprotect(0x40173000, 2572288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 mprotect(0x40173000, 2572288, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0 cacheflush(0x40173000, 0x403e7000, 0, 0x274000, 0x19448 +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
Matthias, I am building latest eglibc on pavo1, which may take some hours. If you have some arm boxes at hand, and see seg fault on it, I'd like to log in to have a look. -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/eglibc/+changelog shows that eglibc (2.12.1-0ubuntu1) is based on eglibc svn r11211, while eglibc (2.12-0ubuntu4) is based on eglibc svn r10817. Run diff between r10817 and r11211, don't see something special may fix this bug. -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
Can't reproduce this problem, here are steps,
1 Remove cvs-revert-flush-cache-textrels.diff from patch/series.
2 Rebuild eglibc
3 dpkg -i libc6_2.12.1-0ubuntu1_armel.deb
4 cp /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so .
5 Run ./testcase, no seg fault.
6. strace -o 3.log java -version
.
mmap2(0x40499000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x64) = 0x40499000
close(3)= 0
mprotect(0x40499000, 4096, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x40172000, 2572288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
mprotect(0x40172000, 2572288, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
cacheflush(0x40172000, 0x403e6000, 0, 0x274000, 0x19448) = 0 // < [1]
mprotect(0x403ed000, 57344, PROT_READ) = 0
open("/proc/self/auxv", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3,
"\20\0\0\0\3278\0\0\6\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\21\0\0\0d\0\0\0\3\0\0\0004\200\0\0"...,
256) = 144
.
It got seg fault on [1] in comment#1. In my case, cacheflush is
executed without seg faults.
# java -version
java version "1.6.0_18"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8) (6b18-1.8-2ubuntu2)
OpenJDK Zero VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
--
[armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 497295] Re: [armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
Get ICE on maverick/x86 also. Cross compile linaro gcc *without* patches, ICE goes away. After compare 4.4.4-7ubuntu3 and linaro gcc, one difference is that -fstack-protector is put in 4.4.4-7ubuntu3 gcc's spec. Remove gcc-default-ssp.diff from rules.patch, and rebuild gcc on x86. No ICE any more. GCC build on ARM is still onging. Can we remove patch gcc-default-ssp.diff to fix this problem? -- [armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604874] Re: firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain
Checkout firefox code from mozilla.org, configured, and built. Still segfaults. Here is a list of steps I did, 1. hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.2/ 192src 2. cd 192src/js/src 3. ~/autoconf-2.13-install/bin/autoconf 4. ./configure 5. make ./dist/bin/js imacro_asm.js ./imacros.jsasm > imacros.c.tmp Segmentation fault -- firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 497295] Re: [armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
ICE is still there on gcc 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2,
$ /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v limits-blockid.c
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -quiet -dumpbase limits-blockid.c -mthumb -march=armv7-a
-mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -auxbase limits-blockid -g -O0 -w -version
-fstack-protector
ignoring nonexistent directory "//usr/local/include/arm-linux-gnueabi"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.4.4/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "//usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabi"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
//usr/local/include
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.4.4/include
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.4.4/include-fixed
//usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C (Ubuntu 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2) version 4.4.4 20100712 (Linaro) [release
2010.07-0] (arm-linux-gnueabi)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.4 20100712 (Linaro) [release 2010.07-0],
GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2-p1.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Compiler executable checksum: fb258f30a01ee336fbd134f4682fdbdc
limits-blockid.c: In function 'q9_func':
limits-blockid.c:15: internal compiler error: in add_stack_var_conflict, at
cfgexpand.c:573
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See for instructions.
Get ICE more simple like this, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39227 is similar to this bug.
$ /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.4.4/cc1 -fstack-protector -O0
limits-blockid.c
q9_func {GC 23942k -> 16083k}
Analyzing compilation unit
Performing interprocedural optimizations
Assembling
functions:
q9_func
limits-blockid.c: In function 'q9_func':
limits-blockid.c:15: internal compiler error: in add_stack_var_conflict, at
cfgexpand.c:573
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See for instructions.
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #39227
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39227
--
[armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604874] Re: firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain
./configure --enable-debug make No segfault. Attached generated imacros.c.tmp However, ./configure Add -fno-inline -fno-strict-aliasing in INTERP_OPTIMIZER, MODULE_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS, and MOZ_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS. Segfaults. ** Attachment added: "imacros.c.tmp" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52580928/imacros.c.tmp -- firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604874] Re: firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain
Configured and built firefox on pavo1 with different options, ./configure --disable-optimize --enable-debug CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" make MODULE_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" INTERP_OPTIMIZER="" MOZ_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" No segfault. ./configure --enable-debug CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" make MODULE_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" INTERP_OPTIMIZER="" MOZ_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" No segfault. ./configure --enable-debug CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" make No segfault. ./configure CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" make Segfault ./configure CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" make MODULE_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" INTERP_OPTIMIZER="" MOZ_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS="" Segfault. -- firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
I am using eglibc 2.12-0ubuntu5, so this bug is filed against 2.12-0ubuntu4. -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
I can start java normally. # java -version java version "1.6.0_18" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8) (6b18-1.8-2ubuntu2) OpenJDK Zero VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
There is no crash on openjdk-6-jre-lib_6b20~pre1-1ubuntu1, using test case in comment #3. # cp /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so . # gcc pr605042.c -o pr605042 -ldl # ./pr605042 12018 My gcc is Ubuntu 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2. -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604870] Re: cyrus-sasl2 fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi reports the same error, so it isn't linaro specific bug. ** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Invalid -- cyrus-sasl2 fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
