[Bug 887886] Re: Pandora does not support your client version. (Need v33 keys)

2011-11-09 Thread Zach Tibbitts
 I started to deploy 0.3.12 through the PPA, but then Pandora updated
again. Need to do some more reverse engineering - looks like they've
changed the login API in the last few minutes,

Pretty sure this is the case. I had it working for a couple hours
earlier by rebuilding from source, but when I got back from lunch, I'm
seeing the same error James Lynch posted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887886

Title:
  Pandora does not support your client version. (Need v33 keys)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pianobar/+bug/887886/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 163739] Re: Upgrade eclipse-cdt to 6.0.1

2009-10-09 Thread Zach Tibbitts
At the very least, these old eclipse packages that don't work with the
version of eclipse in Karmic need to be pulled to avoid confusion.

-- 
Upgrade eclipse-cdt to 6.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 163739] Re: Version 4.x has been released for some time

2009-10-07 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Even 4.x is very old by now. The current version of cdt is 6.0.1, and
it's the version meant to be used with the version of eclipse in Karmic
(3.5.1)

I'm trying the 3.x build in the repo with the version of Eclipse now to
see if there are any glaring issues and I'll report back if I find any

-- 
Version 4.x has been released for some time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 163739] Re: Version 4.x has been released for some time

2009-10-07 Thread Zach Tibbitts
yep, eclipse in Karmic doesn't work with CDT 3.1.2


** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: eclipse-cdt
  
- Version 4.0.0 has been released since 26 June 2007 and version 4.0.1
- since 24 September 2007. The new version includes many fixes and feature
- enhancements. Please package it and put it in the repository!
+ The version of eclipse (3.5.1) in Karmic does not work with the version
+ of eclipse-cdt (3.1.2) in the repo. It should be upgraded to the latest
+ (6.0.1), otherwise, it's a useless package

** Summary changed:

- Version 4.x has been released for some time
+ Upgrade eclipse-cdt to 6.0.1

-- 
Upgrade eclipse-cdt to 6.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275375] Re: Please sync deluge (1.0.7.dfsg-3) from Debian experimental

2009-01-21 Thread Zach Tibbitts
The Deluge Team PPA is me, and I'm not actively developing the client
anymore, that's markybob and andar now.  I see that debian has packaged
the client under deluge instead of deluge-torrent, which I'd be all for.

-zachtib

-- 
Please sync deluge (1.0.7.dfsg-3) from Debian experimental
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275375] Re: Please upgrade to deluge-torrent 1.0.6

2008-12-04 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I'm currently maintaining the PPA, so I guess I could submit it to
REVU... any link to a quick howto?

-- 
Please upgrade to deluge-torrent 1.0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 291062] Re: MASTER - Network Manager sometimes has enable networking unchecked/disabled when resuming from suspend

2008-11-13 Thread Zach Tibbitts
+1 Elias,

On a Thinkpad T61p with Intel 4965 AGN Wifi,
every few suspends NM is disabled, right clicking and enabling it causes the 
applet to freeze and I have to reboot.

-- 
MASTER - Network Manager sometimes has enable networking unchecked/disabled 
when resuming from suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291062
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275375] Re: Please upgrade to deluge-torrent 1.0.0

2008-09-30 Thread Zach Tibbitts
For anyone that wants to use 1.0 in intrepid, there are intrepid
packages in my PPA.

http://launchpad.net/~deluge-team/+archive

Also, I'd like to look into getting it backported sometime after the
intrepid release

-- 
Please upgrade to deluge-torrent 1.0.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 274331] Re: unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages

2008-09-25 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I'm on it
- Zach

-- 
unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 274331] Re: unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages

2008-09-25 Thread Zach Tibbitts
** Changed in: deluge
   Importance: Undecided = High
 Assignee: Deluge Team (deluge-team) = Zach Tibbitts (zachtib)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 274331] Re: unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages

2008-09-25 Thread Zach Tibbitts
** Changed in: deluge
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
unstable 1.0.0 packages should conflict with older packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4

2008-09-11 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Also, is someone looking into packaging CDT 5.0?  Eclipse in the PPA is
up to 3.4, but the current version of CDT in the repositories is ancient
(3.1).

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 202453] Re: [Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet

2008-03-17 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I haven't rebooted yet, but this seems to have fixed the problem.  When
I updated to 0.6.6, networking broke, and when i updated to this bzr
branch, it was fixed

-- 
[Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 202453] Re: [Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet

2008-03-17 Thread Zach Tibbitts
@tippettm:

It's really easy to build, you just need to have the dependencies
installed, so

sudo apt-get build-dep network-manager
bzr branch 
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/network-manager/ubuntu.0.6.x
cd ubuntu.0.6.x
debuild -b
cd ..
sudo dpkg -i libnm*.deb
sudo dpkg -i network-manager*.deb

That's all you should need to get all the packages built.  Although, I
hacked the debian/changelog file to change the version to
0.6.6-0ubuntu2~hardy1 so that the final 0ubuntu2 package would override
it.  The build only took a few minutes on my laptop, which doesn't
usually compile very fast.

Also, be sure you have bzr installed.

-- 
[Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 202453] Re: [Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet

2008-03-17 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I've since rebooted, and can confirm that the bzr branch works as well.

I've been able to connect to my school and home networks, which are both
WPA-secured

-- 
[Hardy] network-manager prevents atheros chip from connecting to the internet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 202864] [NEW] [Hardy] Network Manager 0.6.6 incompatible with Atheros card

2008-03-16 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: network-manager

Upgrading Network Manager to 0.6.6 breaks my wireless.
I'm on a Thinkpad R51, which uses an Atheros wireless card.
I've tried connecting to WPA,WEP, and unsecured networks, none of which work.
Reverting to network manager 0.6.5 fixes the problem right away, and I have no 
trouble at all with my wireless.

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[Hardy] Network Manager 0.6.6 incompatible with Atheros card
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 149125] gnome-mplayer should depend on mplayer-nogui

2007-10-04 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

the gnome-mplayer package in gutsy should depend on mplayer-nogui
instead of just mplayer.  as it is a separate frontend for mplayer, it
shouldn't require to you install both frontends

** Affects: gnome-mplayer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gnome-mplayer should depend on mplayer-nogui
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 128418] Re: New upstream version for Deluge

2007-08-02 Thread Zach Tibbitts
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: deluge-torrent
  
  We've just released Deluge 0.5.3, which aims to fix several issues with
  the previous release in order to make it ready for gutsy.
  
  Also, it would be nice to have the package backported to feisty, as
  there is no version of deluge in feisty's repository
+ 
+ UPDATE: The package is in Debian, so all that's needed is a sync.

-- 
New upstream version for Deluge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 128418] New upstream version for Deluge

2007-07-25 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: deluge-torrent

We've just released Deluge 0.5.3, which aims to fix several issues with
the previous release in order to make it ready for gutsy.

Also, it would be nice to have the package backported to feisty, as
there is no version of deluge in feisty's repository

** Affects: deluge-torrent (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
New upstream version for Deluge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 122870] Package Sunbird 0.5 in Gutsy

2007-06-28 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Sunbird 0.5 has been released, and it would be very nice to have this
packaged for Gutsy

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Package Sunbird 0.5 in Gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-04-12 Thread Zach Tibbitts
That's my plan, to file for a backport after fiestly releases

gQuigs wrote:
 My question is, can it be included in backports if it is not in feisty?

 On 4/12/07, Bas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 That is exactly why I'm reading this thread right now: apt-get
 deluge-torrent did not do any tricks. And yeah, I am f**king happy with the
 improvement!
 Great work Zach!
 .51 or .52 should definately be in one of Feisty's updates.

 --
 Deluge 0.5 in feisty
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90749
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 



-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-04-12 Thread Zach Tibbitts
given that 0.5.1 is still in development, it seems odd that you're using
0.5.2... I think you may have installed the 0.5.0-2 deb package, but it's
still just 0.5

On 4/12/07, shirishag75 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok couple of comments, for me 0.52 does not work for me. Although I think
 I uploaded the bug report to tracs do not remember the details atm. I did
 try the svn checkout also but even that did not work for me. I did delete
 the ~/config/deluge/.state file but still it did not work. There were no
 instructions on the README as to how to un-install if some issue is there.
   Also lets say, a certain version does not work, how to update it
 to the latest working copy of subversion. I know both these things are
 outside the domain of this bug-report but it would be useful for both of us,
 as I would be happy to give you bug-reports if there is a way to that.

 --
 Deluge 0.5 in feisty
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90749
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.



-- 
Zach Tibbitts - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://collegegeek.org

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-22 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I'll look into it, and see if the new code fixes these issues.  The
problem is that now some completely different bugs have been cropping
up.  While the one persistent bug in 0.5 is a relatively easy fix
(removing your .state file and loading a clean state of Deluge), it can
be rather annoying.  Both branches have their problems, but 0.5 contains
some usability improvements over 0.4.  Also, 0.4 can potentially corrupt
downloads if selective downloading is enabled.

In short, Deluge isn't really done yet, and it's still in rapid
development, which is why I'd almost rather it not be in the repository
at all, sadly.  I just don't want users to look at whatever version
winds up packaged in the repositories and think that it's done.

I'm already at work fixing the problems that have cropped up in 0.5, and
I'll see if any of the previously reported bugs on Deluge are resolved
in the new release.

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-20 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Ok, I've resubscribed motu-uvf.

Attached to this post is a .tar.gz containing the requested diffs and
Changelog.

Also, I'd like to make it clear that I am the developer of this
application, if it isn't already.

A few notes about the included files:

The two projects, deluge and python-libtorrent have been merged as of
the 0.5 release.  because of this, the directory structure is different
between the two releases.  The files deluge.diff and diffstat.txt are
diffs of the unmodified Deluge tarballs.  However, I have also included
two files, deluge.alt.diff, and diffstat.alt.txt.  In these two files, I
rearranged the  source directories a little bit so that a more relevant
diff would be produced.  I also removed the libtorrent source code from
the tarball so that it wouldn't be included in the diff.  The libtorrent
code was in the python-libtorrent tarball in 0.4, and so it is in the
Deluge tarball now.  Because of this, a straight diff of the source
makes the changes seem more dramatic than they are by listing several
thousand additions.  The libtorrent code has not changed from 0.4 to
0.5.

Deluge has no upstream Changelog or NEWS file, but I've written a
changelog listing what has been put into the 0.5 release, and included
that in the attached archive.

Finally, build.log is a log of the package being built in prevu.

Deluge 0.5 was uploaded to Debian Sid as of yesterday, so if you do
hopefully decide to allow this in, then a simple sync should work fine.

I'm sorry to occupy your time with this, but I've been working on Deluge
almost non-stop for the last couple of months in order to fix all of the
big problems that it experienced.  I'd hate to see Ubuntu users using a
release as terribly broken as 0.4 was.  If Deluge 0.5 can't make it into
feisty, then I'd rather not have it in the repositories at all, and I
think that some of the above commenters agree with me.

Thank you for all your time and work,

Zach Tibbitts

** Attachment added: Collection of files requested by MOTU
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6879047/deluge-uvf.tar.gz

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-18 Thread Zach Tibbitts
** Description changed:

+ Update: 0.5 is now final
+ 
  I've just packaged the 0.5rc2 .tar.gz of Deluge.
  
  I know asking for a release candidate to be uploaded is asking a lot,
  but it will be final shortly, most likely in a matter of days, and 0.5
  fixes many critical bugs that plagued the 0.4 branch.  The reason I've
  been fairly persistent asking about getting 0.5 into feisty is that, as
  this is the first version of Ubuntu to ship with Deluge in it's
  repositories, I'd rather it not have the incredibly buggy 0.4 branch in
  it. The 0.5 branch is a complete rewrite, that addresses the following
  issues:
  
   * Opening a .torrent file in Deluge is now possible, either from a 
webbrowser such as Firefox or file browser such as Nautilus.
   * A memory leak that may affect the current stable version, 0.4.1, was found 
and fixed during 0.5 development
   * Torrents with multiple files will not download correctly in 0.4.1, and the 
result is that all the downloaded files are corrupted.
   * The interface has been tweaked a little to be more Gnomish, by better 
conforming to the HIG.
   * Overall, 0.5 uses significantly less resources than 0.4, both CPU and RAM.
  
  Now, in the FreezeExceptionProcess wiki, it instructs to upload a few
  different files, but I can't exactly produce these for the following
  reasons:
  
   * It asks for a diff of the upstream tarballs. As 0.5 is a complete rewrite 
from 0.4, the two hardly share a line of code, and thus a diff is more or less 
irrelevant.
   * We don't have a Changelog in our source tarball, but if absolutely 
necessary I could write one.
   * I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to packaging. I've gone through the 
Debian New Maintainer's Guide, and used that in addition to the existing 
packaging for Deluge as a reference for building my own packages.  The process 
didn't involve pbuilder, nor do I know how to use pbuilder, so I can't exactly 
provide a log of it.
  
  I have packaged the 0.5 RC and everything, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, and
- .dsc files, can be found here: http://deluge-
- torrent.org/downloads/0.5_debs/  The package builds and installs just
- fine for me.
+ .dsc files, can be found here: http://deluge-torrent.org/downloads/deb/
+ The package builds and installs just fine for me.
  
  As I've said, I really hope that this package could make it into feisty.
  I realize that it's late, but Deluge is a universe app, and as it's not
  completely vital to Ubuntu, it shouldn't cause any problems by uploading
  a package at this point.
  
  Thanks for your time,
  
  Zach Tibbitts

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-09 Thread Zach Tibbitts
 Please attach the requested info.

As I stated in the original post, most of it is either irrelevant, or I
don't know how to generate it.  I'm no expert in packaging, I just wrote
the thing.

If someone here is reading this and could generate any of the required
files, I'd appreciate it.  I think the only one that applies that I
can't produce is the pbuilder log.

I can get to work on writing up a Changelog file, if that will help.

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-08 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

I've just packaged the 0.5rc2 .tar.gz of Deluge.

I know asking for a release candidate to be uploaded is asking a lot,
but it will be final shortly, most likely in a matter of days, and 0.5
fixes many critical bugs that plagued the 0.4 branch.  The reason I've
been fairly persistent asking about getting 0.5 into feisty is that, as
this is the first version of Ubuntu to ship with Deluge in it's
repositories, I'd rather it not have the incredibly buggy 0.4 branch in
it. The 0.5 branch is a complete rewrite, that addresses the following
issues:

 * Opening a .torrent file in Deluge is now possible, either from a webbrowser 
such as Firefox or file browser such as Nautilus.
 * A memory leak that may affect the current stable version, 0.4.1, was found 
and fixed during 0.5 development
 * Torrents with multiple files will not download correctly in 0.4.1, and the 
result is that all the downloaded files are corrupted.
 * The interface has been tweaked a little to be more Gnomish, by better 
conforming to the HIG.
 * Overall, 0.5 uses significantly less resources than 0.4, both CPU and RAM.

Now, in the FreezeExceptionProcess wiki, it instructs to upload a few
different files, but I can't exactly produce these for the following
reasons:

 * It asks for a diff of the upstream tarballs. As 0.5 is a complete rewrite 
from 0.4, the two hardly share a line of code, and thus a diff is more or less 
irrelevant.
 * We don't have a Changelog in our source tarball, but if absolutely necessary 
I could write one.
 * I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to packaging. I've gone through the 
Debian New Maintainer's Guide, and used that in addition to the existing 
packaging for Deluge as a reference for building my own packages.  The process 
didn't involve pbuilder, nor do I know how to use pbuilder, so I can't exactly 
provide a log of it.

I have packaged the 0.5 RC and everything, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, and
.dsc files, can be found here: http://deluge-
torrent.org/downloads/0.5_debs/  The package builds and installs just
fine for me.

As I've said, I really hope that this package could make it into feisty.
I realize that it's late, but Deluge is a universe app, and as it's not
completely vital to Ubuntu, it shouldn't cause any problems by uploading
a package at this point.

Thanks for your time,

Zach Tibbitts

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 90749] Re: Deluge 0.5 in feisty

2007-03-08 Thread Zach Tibbitts
I'm worried more about the risk of leaving 0.4 in, as it does corrupt
most of its downloads.  I've been working on this release several hours
a day for the past month or so to try to get it in so that feisty
wouldn't ship with a horribly broken Deluge.

-- 
Deluge 0.5 in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90749

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83462] Sync Deluge 0.4.1 into Feisty

2007-02-05 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Deluge 0.4.1 is in Debian, and it builds fine in Ubuntu without any
changes.  Could this package be synced into Feisty?

Source package name: deluge-torrent
Version to sync: 0.4.1-2
Sync from: Debian unstable

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Sync Deluge 0.4.1 into Feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/83462

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 81462] Re: NetworkManager Should Support MSCHAPv2

2007-01-25 Thread Zach Tibbitts
that's odd, i don't know either

On 1/25/07, Jon Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ummm... this doesn't affect Deluge. I'm not sure why Launchpad says it
 does.

 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #400605
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400605

 ** Also affects: deluge (upstream) via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400605
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown

 ** Also affects: network-manager (upstream) via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400605
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown

 ** Changed in: deluge (upstream)
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
  Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #400605 = None
Status: Unknown = Unconfirmed

 --
 NetworkManager Should Support MSCHAPv2
 https://launchpad.net/bugs/81462



-- 
Zach Tibbitts - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://collegegeek.org

-- 
NetworkManager Should Support MSCHAPv2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81462

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79628] Change menu-entry

2007-01-16 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: deluge-torrent

the name in the menu entry for deluge is Deluge-torrent

could this be changed to something a little nicer? either Deluge for
just the name of the program, or Deluge BitTorrent Client for the
name+description, similar to how Firefox is labeled Firefox Web
Browser and Gaim is Gaim Internet Messenger, etc.

I have spoken to the person who packaged deluge into Debian, and he
plans to fix this in 0.4.1-2 (current is 0.4.1-1), so if the new source
package is released and Ubuntu updates to that version, then this fix
shouldn't be necessary.

** Affects: deluge-torrent (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Change menu-entry
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79628

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79627] Update to 0.4.1

2007-01-16 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: deluge-torrent

The latest version of deluge in debian is 0.4.1-1

0.4.1 had a few minor interface tweaks, and also a clean source tarball

** Affects: deluge-torrent (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Update to 0.4.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79627

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 70089] Confirm immediately after sudo

2006-11-03 Thread Zach Tibbitts
Public bug reported:

when using the sudo command in a terminal, it would be nice if it
immediately confirmed if the password was entered correctly.

currently, if you enter an incorrect password, there is a few second
delay to prevent someone from sitting and guessing passwords.

however, there will also be a delay if the command entered into sudo
will take a few seconds to open, and sometimes these are hard to
differentiate between.

for example, if i was opening, say my source.list with:

sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list

gedit would take a few seconds to load. sometimes, i'll mistake this for
a mistyped password. other times, i did mistype the password, and
wrongly assumed it was just taking some time to open, only to realize 30
seconds or a minute later that my file was never opened because I have
turned by focus to something else while the application was loading.

so here's my very minor suggestion:

when using sudo at the command line, follow a correct password with a
simple 'ok' so the user is sure that he or she entered the password
correctly:

sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list
Password: 
ok 
loads gedit

This way, the user knows they entered their password correctly, and can
turn their attention to something else.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Confirm immediately after sudo
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70089

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs