[Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
I'm running Lucid, and update-grub still fails in the same way. Adding GRUB_DEVICE in /etc/default/grub is not enough, you also need the || true patch, because the script (grub-mkconfig) always tests for root, before it even loads /etc/default/grub. For me an acceptable fix would be that if GRUB_DEVICE is set in default/grub, then don't run the test. Is there any other way to indicate a btrfs volume for root than using /dev/whatever? Saying that a certain block device is root isn't really btrfs'y, since one block device may contain more than one volume, and may contain less than all of one volume. Does root= accept anything like BTRFSVOL=asdf or equivalent? -- grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544533] Re: prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1
Copied /lib/firmware/isl3886 from Jaunty into Lucid's /lib/firmware/, and now it works. Why did this file disappear from the linux-firmware package and where would be the sanctioned way to get it in Lucid? -- prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544533] Re: prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1
Ah, of course. Silly me. Install linux-firmware-nonfree and everything will work as expected. -- prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
This is more serious than it seems, not simply a matter of convenience. Packages like desktop-base, which runs update-grub in postinst, fail to install properly when running on a btrfs root. -- grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
This is still a problem in openjdk-6 6b18~pre1-1ubuntu1. Installing default-jdk-builddep forces a gcj install even though openjdk-6-jdk is already installed. -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
s,och,and/or, -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
Ok, better example: apt-get build-dep any-java-package would likely bring in java-compiler och java2-compiler, which would not be satisfied by an already installed openjdk-6-jdk. The reason I mentioned default-jdk-builddep is because the jython package depends on it. The name led me to believe that it was a meta- package for java compilation, since default-jdk on lucid i386 is openjdk-6-jdk. -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
s,depends,build-depends, -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
Is that ideal? Depending on a 'Provides:' seems more flexible that depending on a meta-package. And the meta-package in question brings in different jdk's on different platforms, so it doesn't really make builds more predictable either. Anyway, I should probably take this to the relevant mailing list instead of discussing further here. -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes
I was just playing devil's advocate with myself and trying to understand why one would want to depend on a package or meta-package instead of a virtual dependency. And it certainly is the case that different implementations differ in how well the implement the APIs and how much they implement. For me, coming from the outside, it seems more obvious to depend on java2-compiler than on default-jdk. But this is not the forum to discuss this. Instead of spamming this bug with my objections and/or misunderstandings, I will start reading at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaPolicy and see where that leads. Thank you for the time you have given me. -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455655] [NEW] Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
Public bug reported: [ 14.852661] [ cut here ] [ 14.852667] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/fs/sysfs/dir.c:462 sysfs_add_one+0x49/0x50() [ 14.852671] sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created [ 14.852674] Modules linked in: lbm_cw_cfg80211(+) floppy raid10 raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 raid0 multipath linear fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor e100 mii pcspkr shpchp intel_agp iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support parport_pc nsc_ircc irda crc_ccitt video output yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic psmouse serio_raw snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore snd_page_alloc btusb pcmcia pcmcia_core joydev mac80211 cfg80211 ecb arc4 dm_crypt iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ppdev thinkpad_acpi led_class nvram bnep bridge stp radeon drm agpgart binfmt_misc aes_i586 aes_generic cbc lp parport [ 14.852758] Pid: 1748, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu [ 14.852761] Call Trace: [ 14.852771] [c0139ba0] warn_slowpath+0x60/0x80 [ 14.852779] [c0122000] ? native_write_cr0+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852784] [c0122030] ? native_read_cr3+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852788] [c0122040] ? native_write_cr3+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852793] [c0122520] ? _paravirt_nop+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852797] [c0122520] ? _paravirt_nop+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852802] [c0122520] ? _paravirt_nop+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852807] [c0122790] ? native_flush_tlb_global+0x0/0x60 [ 14.852812] [c01227f0] ? native_flush_tlb_single+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852818] [c01195e0] ? native_flush_tlb_others+0x0/0x110 [ 14.852823] [c0122510] ? __paravirt_pgd_alloc+0x0/0x10 [ 14.852831] [c02c7172] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0xe2/0x270 [ 14.852836] [c02c7384] ? ida_get_new_above+0x84/0x1c0 [ 14.852842] [c01cfd1e] ? find_inode+0x3e/0x70 [ 14.852847] [c020b6c0] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x20 [ 14.852852] [c020b6c0] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x20 [ 14.852857] [c020b9d1] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x21/0x30 [ 14.852862] [c020ba83] ? __sysfs_add_one+0x13/0x90 [ 14.852867] [c020bc59] sysfs_add_one+0x49/0x50 [ 14.852872] [c020c6d9] create_dir+0x49/0x90 [ 14.852877] [c020c74b] sysfs_create_dir+0x2b/0x50 [ 14.852882] [c02c7ff3] kobject_add_internal+0xc3/0x1b0 [ 14.852888] [c02cf3d3] ? kvasprintf+0x43/0x60 [ 14.852897] [c02c8107] kset_register+0x27/0x50 [ 14.852905] [c03508a0] __class_register+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 14.852922] [f7e25250] ? cfg80211_init+0x0/0x70 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.852933] [f7e25b62] wiphy_sysfs_init+0x12/0x20 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.852942] [f7e25259] cfg80211_init+0x9/0x70 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.852947] [c010111e] _stext+0x2e/0x170 [ 14.852956] [c01a935c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [ 14.852960] [c01a935c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [ 14.852981] [c01a93f1] ? vfree+0x21/0x30 [ 14.852988] [c016413d] ? load_module+0x103d/0x1050 [ 14.853038] [c01641d8] sys_init_module+0x88/0x1b0 [ 14.853043] [c0103f6b] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2f [ 14.853053] [c050] ? rwsem_down_failed_common+0xa0/0x1b0 [ 14.853058] ---[ end trace 46a868484e7bdf68 ]--- [ 14.853064] kobject_add_internal failed for ieee80211 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory. [ 14.853145] Pid: 1748, comm: modprobe Tainted: GW 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu [ 14.853148] Call Trace: [ 14.853154] [c04fe166] ? printk+0x18/0x1a [ 14.853159] [c02c8037] kobject_add_internal+0x107/0x1b0 [ 14.853168] [c02c8107] kset_register+0x27/0x50 [ 14.853173] [c03508a0] __class_register+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 14.853185] [f7e25250] ? cfg80211_init+0x0/0x70 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.853195] [f7e25b62] wiphy_sysfs_init+0x12/0x20 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.853203] [f7e25259] cfg80211_init+0x9/0x70 [lbm_cw_cfg80211] [ 14.853209] [c010111e] _stext+0x2e/0x170 [ 14.853214] [c01a935c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [ 14.853218] [c01a935c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [ 14.853239] [c01a93f1] ? vfree+0x21/0x30 [ 14.853244] [c016413d] ? load_module+0x103d/0x1050 [ 14.853293] [c01641d8] sys_init_module+0x88/0x1b0 [ 14.853298] [c0103f6b] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2f [ 14.853304] [c050] ? rwsem_down_failed_common+0xa0/0x1b0 [ 15.285931] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_cfg80211_put_bss [ 15.286100] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_ieee80211_frequency_to_channel [ 15.286633] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_cfg80211_send_rx_auth [ 15.286974] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_cfg80211_unhold_bss [ 15.287418] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_cfg80211_send_rx_deauth [ 15.287640] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_ieee80211_channel_to_frequency [ 15.288099] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol cfg80211_wext_giwname [ 15.288539] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol cfg80211_wext_giwmode [ 15.288920] lbm_cw_mac80211: Unknown symbol lbm_cw_ieee80211_radiotap_iterator_next [ 15.289086]
[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968752/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968753/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968754/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968755/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968757/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968758/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968762/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968763/ProcModules.txt -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
The text in the bug description is the relevant part of the valid dmesg. Attaching the original .apport file. -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
The text in the bug description is the relevant part of the valid dmesg. Attaching the original .apport file. ** Attachment added: The original, valid, .apport file. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968973/apport.linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic_2.6.28-15.52.d07Jlx.apport -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
Hm. I double-clicked the saved report, but it seems apport-gtk decided to gather new information anyway. The above information is about working 2.6.27-15 linux, not the 2.6.28-15 which has the error. -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created
Problem fixed. The package linux-backports-modules-2.6.28-15-generic was installed, containing the lbm_cw_cfg80211 module. Removing the packaged removed the conflict. I still don't understand why that module was loaded, though. Did depmod find symbols in lbm_cw_cfg80211 that p54pci needed, and which are also provided by p54common? -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213175] Re: scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data()
I was not doing anything in particular when this happened. I had just logged in, and my locale is en_DK. Normal Swedish keyboard is default. Although I have the possibility to switch to Chinese IM, it was not active at the time. -- scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 419663] Re: devkit-disks-daemon assert failure: devkit-disks-daemon: atasmart.c:2701: sk_disk_set_blob: Assertion `blob' failed.
Got this crash after attaching three USB disks, of which one is reported by palimpsest as having many reallocated sectors. Both lvm and md is involved, in particular two lvm/dm volumes are configured in a RAID-1 configuration, which is probably an untested configuration and an invitation to race conditions and general confusion. -- devkit-disks-daemon assert failure: devkit-disks-daemon: atasmart.c:2701: sk_disk_set_blob: Assertion `blob' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 419662] Re: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect assert failure: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect: atasmart.c:2687: sk_disk_get_blob: Assertion `(size_t) ((uint8_t*) p - (uint8_t*) d-blob)
Got this just after bug #419663 -- devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect assert failure: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect: atasmart.c:2687: sk_disk_get_blob: Assertion `(size_t) ((uint8_t*) p - (uint8_t*) d-blob) == size' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453226] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/buffer.c:1152 mark_buffer_dirty+0x70/0x90()
Got this together with bug #419662, bug #419663 and bug #453462. -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/buffer.c:1152 mark_buffer_dirty+0x70/0x90() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219199] Re: I cant compiled kernel source from kernel.org using kernel-package
I solved it by doing make menuconfig and disabling xen client support. The only reason I'm compiling my own kernel is to get xen support, so that workaround is not an option for me. -- I cant compiled kernel source from kernel.org using kernel-package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189193] Re: Installer crashed
I experienced this exact problem, and can shine some light on what's happening. The bug is: Ubiquity gives an unclear error message. Instead of something cryptic about the internals of the process, it should say cloop image not found. Please run Ubiquity from the install CD or mount the cloop image on /var/lib/ubiquity/source or preferable something even less cryptical. I made a temporary install with debootstrap, then installed ubiquity to make the real install, the same staged approach as Original Poster here tried. This because the target computer lacks a CD drive. The problem is this: Ubiquity expects to be run from the install CD. After formatting partitions it expects to find /cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs or equivalent, to mount on /var/lib/ubiquity/source. The next step is to copy the contents of said directory to /target. If Ubiquity cannot find the CD cloop image in any of the expected locations, it happily continues with an empty /var/lib/ubiquity/source, copies all its non-existing contents to /target, then goes on to customize the copied filesystem. The first thing it does is set the language, by writing /etc/default/locale. Since /etc/default does not exist, the application breaks down at this point, with the error message noted in the bug report. So, workaround: Don't run ubiquity except from the CD. Or first mount the cloop image on /var/lib/ubiquity/sources. I did the latter, and successfully installed my system. Hopefully by noting this here, the next person to try this will be more lucky when searching for a solution. Adding a feature request that running ubiquity from outside the install CD should work. I have ideas for this. :-) /c -- Installer crashed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302499] [NEW] Ubiquity should be able to run outside the install CD
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity This is a feature request, based on bug #189193 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/189193. Some users (at least two known in the world *ahem*) expect to be able to install ubiquity on a normal system and then run it to configure a new install on that same system. This does not work, because ubiquity expects to find a cloop image to use verbatim as a base for the new install, which it then customizes according to the user's choices. Suggestion: When no cloop image is found: 1. Ubiquity instead does an extended debootstrap of the target, including e.g. ubuntu-desktop. OR 2. Ubiquity, like HTTP-FUSE-Knoppix [1], uses httpfs [2] or some p2p-thing like Shark [3] to access a cloop image online. /c [1] HTTP-FUSE-Knoppix, has root file system on http http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/http-fuse/index-en.html [2] httpfs, FUSE-module for transparent HTTP access. http://httpfs.sourceforge.net/ [3] Shark, swarming downloads over Coral http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/coral-users/2005-April/000262.html ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubiquity should be able to run outside the install CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
