[Bug 1881969] Re: apparmor profile for libvirtd/libvirt-daemon needs fixing

[costinel]

what is the fix right now?

I get this message only once per kernel lifetime, when libvirtd starts
for the first time.

If I stop and restart libvirtd, it never shows again.

happens both with 20.04 lts kernel and hwe kernel (5.4 and 5.11)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881969

Title:
  apparmor profile for libvirtd/libvirt-daemon needs fixing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1881969/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953084] [NEW] should depend on python3-future else doesn't run

[costinel]

Public bug reported:

https://github.com/lpechacek/cpuset/issues/31#issuecomment-663839081

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: cpuset 1.6-3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-41.45~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-41-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Fri Dec  3 00:53:19 2021
Dependencies: python3-cpuset 1.6-3.1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-30 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: cpuset
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-12-02 (0 days ago)

** Affects: cpuset (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953084

Title:
  should depend on python3-future else doesn't run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpuset/+bug/1953084/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1896608] Re: [regression-in-stable] grub-multi-install fails with exit 1 when question grub-efi/install_devices_empty is skipped

[costinel]

I have upgrade the packages from the link provided (manual download
since they're not yet accepted into focal-proposed) and grub-pc postinst
script exits cleanly now. thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896608

Title:
  [regression-in-stable] grub-multi-install fails with exit 1 when
  question grub-efi/install_devices_empty is skipped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1896608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

@juliank thank you.

accordingly #1896608 shouldn't be listed as a blocker on
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-20-04-1-lts-point-release-
status-tracking/17604 ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

manually installing grub works like this:

# grub-install --force --removable --boot-directory=/boot /dev/sda
Installing for i386-pc platform.
Installation finished. No error reported.


meanwhile as a workaround I have symlinked /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.postinst 
to /bin/true so other apt commands can succeed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

I have enabled debugging on /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.postinst when
running dpkg --configure -a: https://termbin.com/7nh1

but I don't understand from the above output why it fails

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

this bionic to focal upgrade still fails. not sure if this is the proper
place to discuss.

18.04.5 installed minimal in vmware player then do-release-upgrade:

https://i.imgur.com/YGLEWvy.png

18.04.5 setup deviations from defaults: root on thin lv created manually
in terminal in live installer. lvm on gpt disk. /boot on second disk,
mbr. grub fails to install on bionic, I booted with a recovery cd and
manually forced install.

I had to make this adjustment to enable thin lv support in initrd
(copied from somewhere i don't remember):

# cat /etc/initramfs-tools/hooks/thin-provisioning-tools
#!/bin/sh

PREREQ="lvm2"

prereqs()
{
 echo ""
}

case $1 in
prereqs)
 prereqs
 exit 0
 ;;
esac

. /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions

copy_exec /usr/sbin/thin_dump
copy_exec /usr/sbin/thin_repair
copy_exec /usr/sbin/thin_restore
copy_exec /sbin/dmeventd
copy_exec /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/device-mapper/libdevmapper-event-lvm2thin.so
copy_exec /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so.2.02
copy_exec /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02
copy_exec /usr/sbin/pdata_tools
ln -s pdata_tools ${DESTDIR}/usr/sbin/cache_check
ln -s pdata_tools ${DESTDIR}/usr/sbin/thin_check

manual_add_modules dm-cache
manual_add_modules dm-cache-smq
manual_add_modules dm-thin-pool

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

ok, so now that this is fixed, why is ubuntu 18.04 to 20.04.1 still
blocked?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

@vorlon,
some of us here are innocent 18.04LTS users waiting for canonical to enable 
do-release-upgrade to focal, because this issue is blocking the LTS to LTS 
upgrade process (link in comment #9)

with that in mind, how can we help testing without access to focal?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

[costinel]

@ded, the bug says for groovy
Started work:   2020-08-18
Completed:  2020-09-02

for focal,
Started work:   2020-09-08

so one can only guess it would take another two weeks, if the same work
conditions apply

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680

Title:
  grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop
  in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure
  in postinst

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1891680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

[costinel]

does anyone from canonical read or care about this issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686859

Title:
  "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/686859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

[costinel]

because if not, just fucking tell us or fucking write a faq entry on
installation wiki

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686859

Title:
  "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/686859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

[costinel]

still ocurring in 20.04.1 - I needed to install ubuntu alongside an
existing partitioned gpt lvm thin pool disk.

could not install grub on selected disk, now I can't get past the error,
as I can't select any other disk nor choose "continue without a
bootloader" because the OK button does absolutely nothing.

this is enormously frustrating. I had to delete the curses I wrote
first. why is this an issue in 2020?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686859

Title:
  "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/686859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1855747] Re: systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules in a tight loop

[costinel]

also other people complained

https://www.reddit.com/r/VFIO/comments/90tg4h/after_loading_vfiopci_instead_of_nvidia_my_dmesg/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855747

Title:
  systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules
  in a tight loop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-440/+bug/1855747/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1855747] Re: systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules in a tight loop

[costinel]

>Kai-Heng Feng (kaihengfeng) wrote on 2019-12-11:   #4

> Can you please run `sudo update-initramfs -u -k all` and see if the
issue still happens?

yes this persists even after that.

I have a nvidia card but I want to blacklist it. even blacklisted, the
systemd-udevd /lib/udev/rules.d/71-nvidia.rules attempt to run the rules
forever.

moving /lib/udev/rules.d/71-nvidia.rules away from udev rules search
path fixes that, but that's not the correct solution. why does systemd-
udev insist repeating instead of failing after first try?

18.04 lts here. drivers nvidia-driver-390

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855747

Title:
  systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules
  in a tight loop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-440/+bug/1855747/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1643706] Re: snap apps need to be able to browse outside of user $HOME dir. for Desktop installs

[costinel]

>Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote on 2016-11-22: #2
>
>Thank you for your bug report, the confinement restriction is a feature 
>though. Where do you want to play videos from? Reading from another location 
>than your userdir or removable media or remote shares is probably something 
>most user never do...


**anywhere**

I want to browse the full filesystem to play media from literally
anywhere

Now, I do understand the snaps were invented for a slightly different
purpose than using snap vlc as the main video player, but some of us do.

Is there any easy quick workaround to enable a snap package to browse
unrestricted the whole root filesystem and any other mounted
filesystems?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643706

Title:
  snap apps need to be able to browse outside of user $HOME dir. for
  Desktop installs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1643706/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854583] [NEW] [ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, Nvidia GPU 81 HDMI/DP, Digital Out, HDMI] Sound is distorted

[costinel]

Public bug reported:

this works ok with latest 5.3.x kernel but not with 4.15 kernel
kernel 5.0.0 does not work ok with zfs so I can't confirm it is fixed or not in 
5.0.0

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: alsa-base (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-70.79-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-70-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair nvidia_modeset 
nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: LXDE
Date: Sat Nov 30 18:43:40 2019
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:NVidia failed
Symptom_Card: GP108 High Definition Audio Controller - HDA NVidia
Symptom_Jack: Digital Out, HDMI
Symptom_Type: Digital clip or distortion, or "overdriven" sound
Title: [ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, Nvidia GPU 81 HDMI/DP, Digital Out, HDMI] 
Sound is distorted
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-22 (465 days ago)

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854583

Title:
  [ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, Nvidia GPU 81 HDMI/DP, Digital Out, HDMI]
  Sound is distorted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1854583/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 149987] Re: CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set

[costinel]

I also need to force remove a module.
It is unacceptable to have to reboot when I know for sure that removing the 
module will not affect the system stability.
It is also difficult to keep rebuilding kernel just to have this feature.

Please reconsider. Thanks.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149987

Title:
  CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/149987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1784152] Re: i2c_hid_get_input floods system logs

[costinel]

changing dev_err to dev_err_once like suggested in comment 35 worked for me, 
thank you!
 probably this hides the cause but at least I'm no longer being hit with tons 
of messages in syslog

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784152

Title:
  i2c_hid_get_input floods system logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1784152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1794522] [NEW] Feature request: able to choose split placement

[costinel]

Public bug reported:

split is awesome but I find myself many times in need to choose where
the new terminal is created.

default is below and on right, but sometimes I need also above and on left
Please add ability to choose split placement (above/below; left/right)

Thanks.

** Affects: terminator (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794522

Title:
  Feature request: able to choose split placement

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/1794522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1794522] Re: Feature request: able to choose split placement

[costinel]

suggestions how could it be done for mouse:
- if mouse is in the lower half, place split below. if mouse is in the upper 
half, when I right-click and split, split above
- if shift or ctrl is held when clicking split, invert split placement
- additional split items in the menu

for keyboard: add a new key to the combination

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794522

Title:
  Feature request: able to choose split placement

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/1794522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1729000] Re: iSCSI Connection abruptly dies writing to Windows Server 2016 Target

[costinel]

I am getting similar message at boot but not to Windows target, instead to a 
DELL EQUALOGIC 100E
Symptom is system hang for a few seconds during boot then it works ok


[   56.363592] [ cut here ]
[   56.363604] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 415 at 
/build/linux-hwe-edge-zpduMv/linux-hwe-edge-4.13.0/kernel/softirq.c:161 
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x46/0x60
[   56.363606] Modules linked in: mptctl mptbase ebtable_filter ebtables 
target_core_user uio tcm_qla2xxx qla2xxx nvme_fc nvme_fabrics nvme_core 
usb_f_tcm tcm_usb_gadget libcomposite udc_core vhost_scsi vhost 
iscsi_target_mod tcm_loop ib_srpt tcm_fc libfc scsi_transport_fc 
target_core_file target_core_iblock target_core_pscsi target_core_mod 
nfnetlink_queue nfnetlink_log nfnetlink bluetooth ecdh_generic dell_rbu bridge 
stp llc ip6table_filter ip6table_nat nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 
nf_nat_ipv6 ip6_tables ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack iptable_filter 
ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 
nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack xt_CHECKSUM xt_tcpudp 
iptable_mangle ip_tables x_tables binfmt_misc zfs(POE) zunicode(POE) zavl(PO) 
icp(POE) zcommon(POE) znvpair(POE)
[   56.363658]  spl(OE) gpio_ich dcdbas ipmi_ssif joydev input_leds 
intel_powerclamp coretemp ipmi_si kvm_intel kvm irqbypass intel_cstate 
ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter shpchp mac_hid lpc_ich nfsd 
auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core 
iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi autofs4 btrfs raid10 
raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq 
libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear hid_generic usbhid hid i2c_algo_bit ttm 
drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt uas fb_sys_fops drm 
usb_storage pata_acpi mpt3sas bnx2 raid_class scsi_transport_sas wmi
[   56.363710] CPU: 1 PID: 415 Comm: kworker/1:1H Tainted: P   OE   
4.13.0-25-generic #29~16.04.2-Ubuntu
[   56.363710] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T310/02P9X9, BIOS 1.12.0 
09/06/2013
[   56.363715] Workqueue: kblockd blk_timeout_work
[   56.363716] task: 9a74690b8000 task.stack: a83941174000
[   56.363718] RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x46/0x60
[   56.363718] RSP: 0018:a83941177d08 EFLAGS: 00010046
[   56.363720] RAX: 0046 RBX: 9a746c6c9330 RCX: 9a745884c480
[   56.363720] RDX: 9a746c6c93d0 RSI: 0200 RDI: c0560cb3
[   56.363721] RBP: a83941177d08 R08: 0008 R09: 01b8
[   56.363721] R10:  R11: 7259 R12: 9a746c6c93c8
[   56.363722] R13: 9a746a499000 R14: 9a746c6cac08 R15: 9a7468068dd8
[   56.363723] FS:  () GS:9a7476e4() 
knlGS:
[   56.363724] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[   56.363724] CR2: 7f2d20bb2f80 CR3: 00022fc0a005 CR4: 000206e0
[   56.363725] Call Trace:
[   56.363733]  _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x1e/0x20
[   56.363738]  __iscsi_conn_send_pdu+0x1c3/0x400 [libiscsi]
[   56.363740]  iscsi_send_nopout+0xb7/0x100 [libiscsi]
[   56.363742]  iscsi_eh_cmd_timed_out+0x287/0x290 [libiscsi]
[   56.363745]  scsi_times_out+0x5b/0x1b0
[   56.363746]  blk_rq_timed_out+0x1f/0x60
[   56.363748]  blk_timeout_work+0xae/0x150
[   56.363751]  process_one_work+0x156/0x410
[   56.363752]  worker_thread+0x4b/0x460
[   56.363754]  kthread+0x109/0x140
[   56.363755]  ? process_one_work+0x410/0x410
[   56.363756]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
[   56.363758]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[   56.363759] Code: 90 66 90 f6 c4 02 74 23 83 ee 01 f7 de 65 01 35 41 72 18 
43 65 8b 05 3a 72 18 43 a9 00 ff 1f 00 74 0d 65 ff 0d 2c 72 18 43 5d c3 <0f> ff 
eb d9 65 8b 05 0f 39 19 43 85 c0 74 e8 e8 56 ff ff ff eb
[   56.363777] ---[ end trace e3001acffd34779e ]---

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729000

Title:
  iSCSI Connection abruptly dies writing to Windows Server 2016 Target

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1729000/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1547332] Re: [Feature Request] Provide option to install root to a ZFS formatted disk

[costinel]

Is anyone at Canonical actually discussing this internally?
If yes, what are the key subjects? Filesystem layout (what dirs go into what 
datasets, personalized parameters like excluding /tmp from being auto 
snapshotted etc)? developer time to code the feature into the installer? what 
else is preventing this from happening sooner?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547332

Title:
   [Feature Request] Provide option to install root to a ZFS formatted
  disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1547332/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

[costinel]

@ comment #9, it has landed into proposed, not into main! this means
xenial won't get 0.7 via hwe... :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734172

Title:
  Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1734172/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

[costinel]

this is really worrying. we chose ubuntu for native zfs but it is such a 
dissapointment to not provide at least a ppa with updated zfs 0.7 for xenial.
if next LTS comes without 0.7 we will switch back to centos that has almost 
immediate release packages after official release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734172

Title:
  Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1734172/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

[costinel]

this is workaround for me that runs correctly:

in rc.local:

(systemctl stop networking.service; systemctl start networking.service;
systemctl restart networking.service; true) &

if i put the commands one by one, rc.local unit will fail because
systemctl start exits non-zero. notice the 'restart' action for the
second command.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551415

Title:
  systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1551415/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

[costinel]

** Attachment added: "dpkg-l.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1551415/+attachment/4812135/+files/dpkg-l.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551415

Title:
  systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1551415/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

[costinel]

how do I debug this?

if i manually run 'ifup -a --read-environment' or 'systemctl start networking' 
it brings all stuff up cleanly.
by 'debug' i mean more than just looking at journalctl -u networking

below contents of network/interfaces, journalctl -u networking and
contents of netwroking unit

-

[Unit]
Description=Raise network interfaces
Documentation=man:interfaces(5)
DefaultDependencies=no
Wants=network.target
After=local-fs.target network-pre.target apparmor.service 
systemd-sysctl.service systemd-modules-load.service
Before=network.target shutdown.target network-online.target
Conflicts=shutdown.target

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
WantedBy=network-online.target

[Service]
Type=oneshot
EnvironmentFile=-/etc/default/networking
ExecStartPre=-/bin/sh -c '[ "$CONFIGURE_INTERFACES" != "no" ] && [ -n 
"$(ifquery --read-environment --list --exclude=lo)" ] && udevadm settle'
ExecStart=/sbin/ifup -a --read-environment
ExecStop=/sbin/ifdown -a --read-environment --exclude=lo
RemainAfterExit=true
TimeoutStartSec=3sec #modified from default which just made the machine hang on 
boot until timeout

--

# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).

source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*

# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The primary network interface
#allow-hotplug eno1
#allow-hotplug ipsec0
auto eno1
auto ipsec0

iface eno1 inet manual
up ip link set eno1 up

iface ipsec0 inet static
bridge_ports eno1
address 192.168.15.113
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.15.254
# dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed
dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8
#link-speed 1000
#link-duplex full
#ethernet-autoneg off
#dns-search project.local
#up dnsmasq -s lan -S //192.168.15.113 -u root --strict-order 
--pid-file=/run/dnsmasq-lan.pid --dhcp-no-override --except-interface=lo 
--interface=ipsec0 --dhcp-leasefile=/var/lib/dnsmasq.lan.leases 
--dhcp-authoritative --listen-address 192.168.15.113 --dhcp-range 
192.168.15.101,192.168.15.199 --dhcp-lease-max=252  --bind-interfaces 
--dhcp-option-force=option:router,192.168.15.254 
--dhcp-option-force=option:ntp-server,192.168.15.113
up dnsmasq -s project -S //192.168.15.113 -u root --strict-order 
--pid-file=/run/dnsmasq-project.pid --dhcp-no-override --except-interface=lo 
--interface=ipsec0 --dhcp-leasefile=/var/lib/dnsmasq.project.leases 
--dhcp-authoritative --listen-address 192.168.15.113 --dhcp-range 
192.168.15.101,192.168.15.199 --dhcp-lease-max=252 --bind-interfaces 
--dhcp-option-force=option:router,192.168.15.254 
--dhcp-option-force=option:ntp-server,192.168.15.113
down kill $(cat /run/dnsmasq-project.pid)

#allow-hotplug eno2
auto eno2
iface eno2 inet static
address 192.168.100.100
netmask 255.255.255.0
#link-speed 100
#link-duplex full
#ethernet-autoneg off
#gateway
# dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed
#dns-nameservers 10.10.200.10
#dns-search project.local

-

-- Logs begin at Thu 2017-02-02 17:34:56 EET, end at Thu 2017-02-02 18:25:01 
EET. --
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces...
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: /bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/bridge
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ethtool
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/hostapd
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wpasupplicant
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: Configuring interface lo=lo (inet)
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: /bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/bridge
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ethtool
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/hostapd
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wpasupplicant
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: /bin/ip link set dev lo up
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: /bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose 
/etc/network/if-up.d
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-up.d/000resolvconf
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 
/etc/network/if-up.d/arping
Feb 02 17:35:13 linux ifup[6077]: run-parts: executing 

[Bug 1403152] Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count

[costinel]

seeing this on xenial after this sequence of operations:

lxc stop run2
lxc delete run2
lxc copy run1 run2
lxc start run2 <- hangs here, with later dmesg

[337766.146479] unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage 
count = 1
[337772.435786] INFO: task lxd:20665 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[337772.435856]   Tainted: P   OE   4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu
[337772.435922] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables 
this message.
[337772.436002] lxd D 88006b6cbcb8 0 20665  1 0x0004
[337772.436006]  88006b6cbcb8 821d0560 880235aa8000 
8801b57d2580
[337772.436009]  88006b6cc000 81ef5f24 8801b57d2580 

[337772.436010]  81ef5f28 88006b6cbcd0 81830f15 
81ef5f20
[337772.436012] Call Trace:
[337772.436020]  [] schedule+0x35/0x80
[337772.436022]  [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
[337772.436024]  [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb9/0x130
[337772.436026]  [] mutex_lock+0x1f/0x30
[337772.436029]  [] copy_net_ns+0x6e/0x120
[337772.436033]  [] create_new_namespaces+0x11b/0x1d0
[337772.436035]  [] copy_namespaces+0x6d/0xa0
[337772.436038]  [] copy_process+0x905/0x1b70
[337772.436040]  [] _do_fork+0x80/0x360
[337772.436044]  [] ? SyS_access+0x1e8/0x230
[337772.436046]  [] SyS_clone+0x19/0x20
[337772.436048]  [] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71


fwiw, at the time of stop, run2 had an additional IP address on dev lo, and at 
the time of copy, run1 also was running and had an additional ip address on dev 
lo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403152

Title:
  unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1403152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1604010] Re: sntp missing

[costinel]

workaround for ubuntu 16.04 lts is to install the deprecated ntpdate
that still works ok:

ntpdate:amd64/xenial-security 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.3 uptodate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010

Title:
  sntp missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1604010/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

and #1544942 does not say dry-run removes packages, but says the output
is different between with and without dry-run (which is something I also
observed but only the first run after the upgrade to latest precise
version of unattended-upgrades)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

> the --dry-run removes the packages

no, it doesn't. #1544942 affects only one person, and in comment #64 you
can see that files on /boot are not removed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'?

also, if you pay attention to my pasted logs, THE FIRST TIME the updated 
version is run with -d --dry-run, it DOES mention wanting to remove kernels.
however the second time I run it, without --dry-run, it NO LONGER mentions 
removing packages!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

here is another box

oot@wifi:~# eatmydata apt-get install unattended-upgrades
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
  bsd-mailx
The following packages will be upgraded:
  unattended-upgrades
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded.
Need to get 24.8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 4,096 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main 
unattended-upgrades all 0.76ubuntu1.2 [24.8 kB]
Fetched 24.8 kB in 0s (124 kB/s)
Reading changelogs... Done
apt-listchanges: Mailing root: apt-listchanges: changelogs for wifi
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 293592 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace unattended-upgrades 0.76ubuntu1.1 (using 
.../unattended-upgrades_0.76ubuntu1.2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement unattended-upgrades ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead ...
Setting up unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) ...
root@wifi:~# strace -etrace=file -f unattended-upgrades -d --dry-run > 
/var/tmp/firstrun.log 2>&1

cat /var/tmp/firstrun.log|pastebinit -b http://paste.ubuntu.com
http://paste.ubuntu.com/15273973/

root@wifi:~# ls /boot
abi-3.13.0-65-generic initrd.img-3.13.0-76-generic
abi-3.13.0-68-generic initrd.img-3.13.0-77-generic
abi-3.13.0-71-generic initrd.img-3.13.0-79-generic
abi-3.13.0-73-generic lost+found
abi-3.13.0-74-generic memtest86+.bin
abi-3.13.0-76-generic memtest86+_multiboot.bin
abi-3.13.0-77-generic System.map-3.13.0-65-generic
abi-3.13.0-79-generic System.map-3.13.0-68-generic
config-3.13.0-65-generic  System.map-3.13.0-71-generic
config-3.13.0-68-generic  System.map-3.13.0-73-generic
config-3.13.0-71-generic  System.map-3.13.0-74-generic
config-3.13.0-73-generic  System.map-3.13.0-76-generic
config-3.13.0-74-generic  System.map-3.13.0-77-generic
config-3.13.0-76-generic  System.map-3.13.0-79-generic
config-3.13.0-77-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-65-generic
config-3.13.0-79-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-68-generic
grub  vmlinuz-3.13.0-71-generic
initrd.img-3.13.0-65-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-73-generic
initrd.img-3.13.0-68-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-74-generic
initrd.img-3.13.0-71-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-76-generic
initrd.img-3.13.0-73-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-77-generic
initrd.img-3.13.0-74-generic  vmlinuz-3.13.0-79-generic

root@wifi:~# grep LTS /etc/motd
Welcome to Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.13.0-77-generic x86_64)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? It's
'false' by default.

yes,

root@mailhost:~# grep Dependencies /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true";


root@mailhost:~# ls -lht /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1K May  8  2013 
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

worse, before running unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove showed
lots of kernels good for removal. after upgrading and running the new
unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove no longer lists these kernels at
fit for autoremove.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059

Title:
  "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

[costinel]

this bugs says "Precise Fix Released  Medium  Brian Murray  Edit"

apt-listchanges -a /var/cache/apt/archives/unattended-
upgrades_0.76ubuntu1.2_all.deb says

" unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=medium

  * cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal. (LP: #1267059)

 -- Brian Murray   Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:06:00 -0800"


first run

root@mailhost:/boot# unattended-upgrades -d --dry-run
Initial blacklisted packages:
Starting unattended upgrades script
Allowed origins are: ['o=Ubuntu,a=precise-security']
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
Checking: dosfstools ([""])
Checking: gdisk ([""])
Checking: libnvpair1 (["", ""])
Checking: libudev0 ([""])
Checking: libuutil1 (["", ""])
Checking: libzfs2 (["", ""])
Checking: libzpool2 (["", ""])
Checking: spl (["", ""])
Checking: spl-dkms (["", ""])
Checking: udev ([""])
Checking: upstart ([""])
Checking: x11-utils ([""])
Checking: zfs-dkms (["", ""])
Checking: zfs-doc (["", ""])
Checking: zfsutils (["", ""])
pkgs that look like they should be upgraded:
Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s)
blacklist: []
InstCount=0 DelCount=0 BrokenCout=0
Option --dry-run given, *not* performing real actions
Packages that are upgraded:
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
marking linux-image-3.2.0-96-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-82-generic for remove
marking python-aptdaemon for remove
marking libpolkit-backend-1-0 for remove
marking libck-connector0 for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-91-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-83-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-90-generic for remove
marking python-defer for remove
marking aptdaemon for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-84-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-88-generic for remove
marking policykit-1 for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-97-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-85-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-95-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-86-generic for remove
marking consolekit for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-94-generic for remove
marking python-pkg-resources for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-87-generic for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-93-generic for remove
marking libpam-ck-connector for remove
marking libpolkit-agent-1-0 for remove
marking linux-image-3.2.0-92-generic for remove
Packages that are auto removed: 'linux-image-3.2.0-96-generic 
linux-image-3.2.0-82-generic python-aptdaemon libpolkit-backend-1-0 
libck-connector0 linux-image-3.2.0-91-generic linux-image-3.2.0-83-generic 
linux-image-3.2.0-90-generic python-defer aptdaemon 
linux-image-3.2.0-84-generic linux-image-3.2.0-88-generic policykit-1 
linux-image-3.2.0-97-generic linux-image-3.2.0-85-generic 
linux-image-3.2.0-95-generic linux-image-3.2.0-86-generic consolekit 
linux-image-3.2.0-94-generic python-pkg-resources linux-image-3.2.0-87-generic 
linux-image-3.2.0-93-generic libpam-ck-connector libpolkit-agent-1-0 
linux-image-3.2.0-92-generic'
/usr/bin/dpkg --status-fd 6 --force-depends --force-remove-essential --remove 
aptdaemon:all python-aptdaemon:all policykit-1:amd64 consolekit:amd64 
libpam-ck-connector:amd64 libck-connector0:amd64 libpolkit-agent-1-0:amd64 
libpolkit-backend-1-0:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-82-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-83-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-84-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-85-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-86-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-87-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-88-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-90-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-91-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-92-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-93-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-94-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-95-generic:amd64 
linux-image-3.2.0-96-generic:amd64 linux-image-3.2.0-97-generic:amd64 
python-defer:all python-pkg-resources:all
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/locale: 0 KiB
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/man: 0 KiB

Total disk space freed by localepurge: 0 KiB

Packages auto-removed
InstCount=0 DelCount=25 BrokenCount=0

however, second run without --dry-run:

root@mailhost:/boot# unattended-upgrades -d
Initial blacklisted packages:
Starting unattended upgrades script
Allowed origins are: ['o=Ubuntu,a=precise-security']
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting candidate version: ''
adjusting 

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

[costinel]

Can you file it against initramfs-tools-core please?
the init file comes from that package.

ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
initramfs-tools-core: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545297

Title:
  hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

[costinel]

ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -C2 hostname /usr/share/initramfs-
tools/init


# mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules are 
called!
if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then
/bin/hostname -b -F /etc/hostname 2>&1 1>/dev/null
fi

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545297

Title:
  hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

[costinel]

ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ zcat /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-4-generic | cpio -i  
192905 blocks
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -n -C2 hostname init64-
65-
66:# mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules 
are called!
67:if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then
68:/bin/hostname -b -F /etc/hostname 2>&1 1>/dev/null
69-fi
70-

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545297

Title:
  hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

[costinel]

** Attachment added: "hostname.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+attachment/4574658/+files/hostname.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545297

Title:
  hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1241376] Re: procps (1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1) upgrade error

[costinel]

I don't think procps should return an error when one of the sysctl.d/
files contains incorrect data.

Printing the error would be useful especially if the exact file and
value is mentioned, otherwise saying oh, we failed when in fact only
one attribute failed to load is cumbersome.

Just because iscsitarget package upgrade failed to remove it's sysctl.d
config file is not fair to let other packages fail upgrade because of
dependency on procps which did not start but otherwise did NOT affect it
in any way (munin, for example, failed to be configured by apt-get dist-
upgrade because of that)

Don't know if this is the proper place to address this comment to
package authors, so if any of you reading this consider I've written in
the wrong place please direct me to the correct site/link!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241376

Title:
  procps (1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1) upgrade error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1241376/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 780513] [NEW] package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

[costinel]

Public bug reported:

Cursors

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May 10 02:28:13 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat starea 
de eroare la ieșire 2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1)
SourcePackage: oxygencursors
Title: package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat 
starea de eroare la ieșire 2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: oxygencursors (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780513

Title:
  package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a
  returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 780513] Re: package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

[costinel]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780513

Title:
  package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a
  returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 202952] Re: Add native ZFS to Ubuntu

[costinel]

it is a non-starter due to litigation and patent licensing. - are you
saying that it is PROHIBITED BY LICENSE to publish source code that
makes a GPL source code interface with a CDDL source code, once compiled
IN PRIVATE following PUBLIC COMPILATION INSTRUCTIONS ?

-- 
Add native ZFS to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 217311] Re: Unable to run Virtual Machine

[costinel]

Julián - from the host GUI.

-- 
Unable to run Virtual Machine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 217311] Re: Unable to run Virtual Machine

[costinel]

I can confirm this on ubuntu 9.04

Linux desktop 2.6.28-15-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 18:40:08 UTC 2009 
i686 GNU/Linux
ii  kvm1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3
  Full virtualization on i386 and amd64 hardwa
ii  kvm-pxe5.4.3+dfsg-0.2ubuntu1
  PXE ROM's for KVM
ii  libvirt-bin0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 
  the programs for the libvirt library
ii  libvirt0   0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 
  library for interfacing with different virtu
ii  python-libvirt 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 
  libvirt Python bindings
ii  python-virtinst0.400.1-2ubuntu2 
  Programs to create and clone virtual machine
ii  python-virtkey 0.50ubuntu2  
  Library to emulate keyboard keypresses.
ii  virt-manager   0.6.1-1ubuntu4   
  desktop application for managing virtual mac

logging off and on solves the problem

-- 
Unable to run Virtual Machine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 108711] Re: [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV in XRRGetScreenInfo()

[costinel]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91545 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91545

how do i get rid of receiving these emails?

On 6/18/07, Apport retracing service [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91545 ***
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91545

 ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7382766/CoreDump.gz

 --
 [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV in XRRGetScreenInfo()
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108711
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug (via bug 91545).


-- 
[apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV in XRRGetScreenInfo()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 99462] Re: [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV

[costinel]

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094065/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094066/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094067/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094068/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094069/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094070/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094071/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094072/ThreadStacktrace.txt

-- 
[apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99462

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 99462] [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV

[costinel]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kde-guidance

i don;t know; this window has appeared when i tried to use two monitors
on my toshiba satellite 1900-101

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Mar 31 18:21:12 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/python-support/kde-guidance/displayconfig-restore.py
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5
Package: kde-guidance 0.8.0-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/displayconfig-restore
ProcCwd: /home/laptop
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
 LANG=C
 LANGUAGE=en_US
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: kde-guidance
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
Uname: Linux Laptop 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev scanner 
video

** Affects: kde-guidance (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99462

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs