[Bug 644644] Re: Frequent PA crashes during playback - pa_stream_cork() failed: Connection terminated and pa_stream_writable_size(): Connection failed
EeePC 901, Ubuntu 10.10 I'm a newcomer to linux and there is much I don't understand but I do have some computer skills and I have noticed that no-one has mentioned audio sampling rate. When I discovered this problem and looked for a solution I found that some video files will play properly and some won't. So I did some experiments with the following results. Any file where the audio is mp3 or aac or ac3 with a sampling rate of 22.05 kHz will play in Totem without problems. Any file where the audio is mp3 or aac or ac3 with a sampling rate of 24 kHz will fail to play in Totem with the error messages described above. Since 44.1 kHz or 22.05 kHz seems to be the accepted standard in North America, I suspect that someone wrote a piece of code which, in effect, assumes that the sampling rate can only be 44.1 kHz or 22.05 kHz. Many years ago I made a similar mistake and trashed an operating system. Unfortunately for me, the majority of my video files use mp3 at 24 kHz because I have found that 22.05 kHz doesn't sync properly with the video. I believe that it's something to do with the PAL TV standard in Europe. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644644 Title: Frequent PA crashes during playback - pa_stream_cork() failed: Connection terminated and pa_stream_writable_size(): Connection failed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509748] Re: firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use
Please excuse my mistake. The trouble with following a defined path is that you often find the path you end on is not the one you thought you were taking at the start. Specifically - when I decided to revise the content of my report, I should have started again with a new title. -- firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509748] Re: firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38094355/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38094356/profiles.ini.txt -- firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509748] [NEW] firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 According to Synaptic I have Firefox 3.5 installed, according to Firefox it's 3.0. Bug numbers #338785 and #120991 also appear to be relevant. I routinely run the the computer continuously for several days. The most common reason for a restart is a Firefox crash. I thought it was only MS Windows that didn't understand "Restart later". Ubuntu 9.04 on Asus Eee PC 901 (NB no swap partition) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.17+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-17-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- firefox stops working properly after several days continuous use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 14135] Re: Grub Install Failure
I suspect that the backup CDs did a Windows restore and not an install. If you had installed Windows XP, it should have eliminated Grub. There are ways of restoring the Windows boot process. Have a look at some of these. http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-how-to-uninstall-grub/ http://en.kioskea.net/faq/sujet-2677-super-grub-disk-live-cd http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&q=linux+windows+grub+mbr+repair&meta=&aq=f&oq=linux+windows+grub+mbr+repair&fp=177016bc12fe49d4 -- Grub Install Failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 14135] Re: Grub Install Failure
Based on the error messages I have seen so far I have come to some provisional conclusions. 1. grub is not comfortable with the ubuntu strategy of using UUID instead of /dev/hdax. 2. The default grub behaviour of assuming (hd0,0) after the kernel isn't found tends to hide errors if (hd0,0) is actually valid. 3. The ubuntu grub installer needs some work. -- Grub Install Failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
