[Bug 789527] Re: nm-applet sometimes removes VPN menu after suspend/resume
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 780602 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780602 ** Also affects: network-manager-applet Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789527 Title: nm-applet sometimes removes VPN menu after suspend/resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager-applet/+bug/789527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947095] Re: Closing lid fails to suspend
This appears to be fixed as of 2012-03-31 and whatever updates have come out in the past week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947095 Title: Closing lid fails to suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/947095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 964750] Re: nfs/rpc.statd becomes unresponsive
Okay, I've tested these same conditions under a CentOS 6.2 vanilla system, kernel 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64. Don't know how far upstream this goes, but I'm conducting the same under FreeBSD/FreeNAS and will update this report with the results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964750 Title: nfs/rpc.statd becomes unresponsive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/964750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 964750] [NEW] nfs/rpc.statd becomes unresponsive
Public bug reported: We've tested this on: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, 11.10, and Debian 6.0.4, all on x64, current updates, and a pretty vanilla installation. Condition summary: We have ~1600 users with live network homes, all Mac clients. There's typically around 150 simultaneous connections. Under these conditions, we can reliably get NFS to become unresponsive within a couple of hours, just by logging in ~150 users and opening Word (for example). There's no clear indication on what exactly causes the failures. Being Mac clients 10.6 and below, these are using NFS3. We've tested using one physical server, with a hardware RAID and an ext3 filesystem. We've also tested on two separate VMs with ext4. All systems in question used LVM. Here's what our server logs indicate when the failures happen: Mar 23 15:40:47 debfs mountd[2365]: authenticated mount request from 172.30.109.132:1020 for /srv/homes (/srv/homes) Mar 23 15:40:58 debfs mountd[2365]: authenticated mount request from 172.30.109.73:1020 for /srv/homes (/srv/homes) Mar 23 15:41:06 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.106.249 Mar 23 15:41:06 debfs mountd[2365]: authenticated mount request from 172.30.109.27:1020 for /srv/homes (/srv/homes) Mar 23 15:41:09 debfs mountd[2365]: authenticated mount request from 172.30.109.63:1020 for /srv/homes (/srv/homes) Mar 23 15:41:14 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.106.249 ** Mar 23 15:41:19 debfs kernel: [ 8395.736310] statd: server rpc.statd not responding, timed out ** Mar 23 15:41:19 debfs kernel: [ 8395.736331] lockd: cannot unmonitor hs13406s4354.dsdk12.schoollocal Mar 23 15:41:38 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.137.223 Mar 23 15:41:52 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.137.223 Mar 23 15:41:54 debfs kernel: [ 8430.737038] statd: server rpc.statd not responding, timed out Mar 23 15:41:54 debfs kernel: [ 8430.737054] lockd: cannot unmonitor hslib23s5174.dsdk12.schoollocal Mar 23 15:42:10 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.110.25 Mar 23 15:42:15 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.110.25 Mar 23 15:42:29 debfs kernel: [ 8465.737071] statd: server rpc.statd not responding, timed out Mar 23 15:42:29 debfs kernel: [ 8465.737090] lockd: cannot unmonitor MS20603S4451.dsdk12.schoollocal Mar 23 15:42:31 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.110.20 Mar 23 15:42:40 debfs rpc.statd[741]: Received erroneous SM_UNMON request from debfs for 172.30.110.20 Upon closer examination, the [lockd] process shows a 'D' state when this is going on. Usually, my only recourse is to reboot the server. I've tried different values for RPCNFSDCOUNT in /etc/default/nfs-kernel- server, and have NEED_STATD=yes in /etc/default/nfs-common. Otherwise, everything is pretty well stock. Here's the /etc/exports: /srv/homes 172.30.0.0/16(insecure_locks,insecure,rw,sync,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check) I've tested with 'insecure_locks' and without. The 'insecure' option is to make the Mac clients happy. Unfortunately, modifying the NFS options on the clients would be rather difficult in our environment. More information can be provided as needed. ** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964750 Title: nfs/rpc.statd becomes unresponsive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/964750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947095] [NEW] Closing lid fails to suspend
Public bug reported: Closing the lid fails to suspend the system on a MacBook Pro 6.1 in 12.04 Beta 1 Watching /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0 shows the correct state when closed/open. Output of acpid -d -l: acpid: procfs received event button/lid LID0 0080 0009 acpid: rule from 1443[0:0] matched acpid: notifying client 1443[0:0] acpid: rule from 1443[0:0] matched acpid: notifying client 1443[0:0] acpid: rule from /etc/acpi/events/lidbtn matched acpid: executing action /etc/acpi/lid.sh BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES END HANDLER MESSAGES acpid: action exited with status 1 acpid: 3 total rules matched acpid: procfs completed event button/lid LID0 0080 0009 acpid: procfs received event button/lid LID0 0080 000a acpid: rule from 1443[0:0] matched acpid: notifying client 1443[0:0] acpid: rule from 1443[0:0] matched acpid: notifying client 1443[0:0] acpid: rule from /etc/acpi/events/lidbtn matched acpid: executing action /etc/acpi/lid.sh BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES END HANDLER MESSAGES acpid: action exited with status 1 acpid: 3 total rules matched acpid: procfs completed event button/lid LID0 0080 000a This worked in 11.10. Bug 863834 (from 11.10) may be related or similar. No peripherals are attached, including external displays. Same behavior occurs whether AC power is attached or on battery power. Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release:12.04 Linux josh-macbookpro 3.2.0-18-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 2 20:02:50 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Expected behavior: suspend on lid close/resume on open ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: acpi-support 0.139 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 5 05:31:50 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64+mac (20110921.2) SourcePackage: acpi-support UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-02 (3 days ago) ** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lid macbook power precise suspend -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947095 Title: Closing lid fails to suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/947095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947095] Re: Closing lid fails to suspend
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947095 Title: Closing lid fails to suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/947095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947095] Re: Closing lid fails to suspend
** Attachment added: dmesg_12.04b1_2012-03-05.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/947095/+attachment/2816828/+files/dmesg_12.04b1_2012-03-05.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947095 Title: Closing lid fails to suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/947095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947095] Re: Closing lid fails to suspend
Whoops - I should say, suspending works as expected when initiating it via the panel menu, for instance. Additionally, in my attached dmesg, I had acpi=rsdt passed to the kernel for troubleshooting an older issue. Removing it did not change the lid/suspend behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947095 Title: Closing lid fails to suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/947095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641259] Re: grub does not appear to load after maverick post-beta install
FWIW, I'm seeing this on an Acer AS1410 as well. -- grub does not appear to load after maverick post-beta install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544469] Re: iSight webcam on Macbook Pro does not work
I don't think this is limited to a MacBook Pro. I'm having the same issue on a 24 iMac: Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05ac:8502 Apple, Inc. Built-in iSight Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass 239 Miscellaneous Device bDeviceSubClass 2 ? bDeviceProtocol 1 Interface Association bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x05ac Apple, Inc. idProduct 0x8502 Built-in iSight bcdDevice2.19 iManufacturer 1 iProduct2 iSerial 3 bNumConfigurations 1 -- iSight webcam on Macbook Pro does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
Actually, that must have been a coincidence. That module isn't loaded now, but it works anyway (after a few days and reboots). # lsmod | grep video uvcvideo 59080 0 videodev 36736 1 uvcvideo v4l1_compat14496 2 uvcvideo,videodev video 19380 1 i915 output 2780 1 video Not sure what it was.. Hopefully this may help someone else. -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
Well, after loading the 'gspca_ov519' module, the camera now works, just FYI :) -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458799] Re: Karmic: Intermittent: display does not turn on when lid opens
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34200256/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34200257/XsessionErrors.txt -- Karmic: Intermittent: display does not turn on when lid opens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458799] [NEW] Karmic: Intermittent: display does not turn on when lid opens
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pm-utils (system is current as of 23OCT2009, 00:13 MDT; Release 9.10) This may not be pm-utils. Since recent updates (over the past week?), I've noticed that occasionally, my display will not turn back on when I open the lid. This is not opening from a sleep state. For AC Power, the machine is not set to sleep - I close the lid and may open it again in an hour and the display may not turn on. The machine is responsive (does not hang). I generally get the display to turn back on by pressing the suspend button and then waking it from suspend. Closing and reopening the lid does not help. Pressing FN+crt/lcd does not get the screen to turn on. I'm also not able to switch TTYs. lspci | grep VGA: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) As said, this is intermittent, and I cannot identify a pattern with it. It seems like the longer I leave the lid closed, the more certain this is going to occur. Executing xset dpms force off doesn't cause this (I haven't been able to reproduce it, at least). In /var/log/messages, I just see a few lines like this (which are probably normal): Oct 22 23:38:02 josh-laptop kernel: [79789.169729] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:02 josh-laptop kernel: [79789.334873] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:03 josh-laptop kernel: [79789.755161] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:03 josh-laptop kernel: [79789.921755] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:03 josh-laptop kernel: [79790.314346] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:03 josh-laptop kernel: [79790.480495] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:04 josh-laptop kernel: [79790.870656] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 Oct 22 23:38:04 josh-laptop kernel: [79791.036369] [drm] TV-16: set mode NTSC 480i 0 I know I may be lacking information here. I'd be more than happy to provide any other information that may help isolate this. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 23 00:02:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs Package: pm-utils 1.2.5-2ubuntu7 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: pm-utils Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Karmic: Intermittent: display does not turn on when lid opens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] [NEW] Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
Public bug reported: Since upgrading to Karmic (RC) on this Dell Inspiron 1520, the integrated webcam no longer works. This worked out of the box in Jaunty. It is on the supported list at http://linux-uvc.berlios.de/ $ lsusb Bus 002 Device 003: ID 05a9:2640 OmniVision Technologies, Inc. OV2640 Webcam $ ls /dev/video* ls: cannot access /dev/video*: No such file or directory $ uname -srv Linux 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 lsmod shows uvcvideo, videodev, and v4l1_compat are loaded. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 1520 ov2640 uvcvideo video0 -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34308486/dmesg.log -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34308527/lspci-vnvn.log -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
** Attachment added: grep-uvc.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34308506/grep-uvc.log -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459586] Re: Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520)
** Attachment added: lsusb.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34308522/lsusb.log -- Karmic: OV2640 Webcam no longer works (Inspiron 1520) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459586 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447577] Re: [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance
I don't want to speak too soon, but my issues seem to have drastically improved (resolved?). I can't say what did it - a recent update or just coincidence. One thing I have changed is stop using avant-window-navigator. Since I did test under a new user without any desktop effects (completely stock) and things seemed slow, this could be just a coincidence. In any event, I'm hoping my recent experience does indicate a resolve :) [updated system as of 0200 11OCT09] -- [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447577] [NEW] [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Since upgrading to Karmic Beta, there's a definite noticeable decrease in graphical performance. I don't know the exact culprit of this, unfortunately. It's noticeable on window (re)drawing mostly, opening an application menu, and other such things. I know glxgears is no benchmark, but when using it, there's certainly a noticeable choppiness there. Overall, it's somewhat subtle, but noticeable enough to be annoying. Since I'm not sure where to start with this, I'm willing to try whatever is needed to find the culprit. I have tested with xserver-xorg-video- intel 2.4 and didn't notice the issues, but I also couldn't enable compiz, for example. I've tested this under a 'test' user without compiz and there was a degradation there as well. I've tried the Mesa packages from X Retro: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-retro, but it didn't seem to impact anything. Further information: lspci -vvnn | grep VGA compatible controller 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) 2.6.31-13-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP libgl1-mesa-dri: Version: 7.6.0-1+really7.6.0~git20090817-0ubuntu8 xserver-xorg-video-intel: Installed: 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu1 xorg: Installed: 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 Bug 440986 _may_ be related. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 9 15:01:02 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 MachineType: Dell Inc. MP061 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs Package: xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-13-generic root=UUID=c684930b-420e-4d72-8de7-e9225f502115 ro splash vga=788 quiet quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.42-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1+really7.6.0~git20090817-0ubuntu8 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090825.fc74e119-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:19423): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:19423): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:19521): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:19511): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (Do:19546): Wnck-CRITICAL **: wnck_set_client_type got called multiple times. dmi.bios.date: 06/27/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A09 dmi.board.name: 0FF049 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA09:bd06/27/2007:svnDellInc.:pnMP061:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0FF049:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: MP061 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. fglrx: Not loaded system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: i686kernel: 2.6.31-13-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447577] Re: [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376241/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376242/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376243/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376244/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376245/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376247/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376248/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376249/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376250/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376251/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376252/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376253/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376254/XorgLog.gz ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376255/XorgLogOld.gz ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376256/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376257/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376258/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376259/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33376260/xkbcomp.txt -- [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447577] Re: [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance
Actually, bug 416073 may more closely relate, but I'm not sure we're experiencing the same issue or not. -- [Karmic] Regression in Intel i9xx performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 421232] Re: Sluggish performance on Intel video card
Same here, with a 945GM. There's a few different bug reports here on this, but titled to specific cards. Seems like a wide range of the Intel cards are affected. I certainly hope the issues we're experiencing with performance is worked out through one of these reports. These are a couple other reports that sound related: 416073 440986 -- Sluggish performance on Intel video card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
After a little testing, it does seem that the culprit (in my case) is xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.8. I reverted to 2.4 and things were definitely improved, but there were obvious side-effects to reverting. Oddly enough, running glxgears reports a better frame rate under 2.8, but is definitely choppy, whereas 2.4 gave a lower frame rate, but was not choppy. I'm just going by the overall feel of things, so I apologize for the lack of concrete data on this. I'm more than willing to provide more information if it'd be beneficial. -- [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
Seems like performance here has degraded a bit in the past few days as well. There's been so many updates it's hard to say what the culprit may be ;) (perhaps the kernel bumps).. I don't have the i965, but it sounds related: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03) VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) I haven't done any official benchmarking, but window redrawing does seem to lack the performance it did a few days ago, and I've noticed a bit more flickering with various other things (noticeably the 'busy' mouse cursor, drawing windows, etc). 2.6.31-12-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP xserver-xorg-video-intel: 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu2 libgl1-mesa-dri: 7.6.0 -- [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438335] Re: Boot messages show before xsplash kicks in
I'm experiencing this as well. I'm using Grub 1 (not a fresh install).. After selecting the kernel to boot, the screen goes black for a few seconds, then on to the above messages (fsck [clean] and a few others.. then finally xsplash). It does indeed seem like a regression from the behavior in Jaunty - a completely quiet startup. Is this expected behavior? I'm willing to submit whatever logs are needed if it can help. -- Boot messages show before xsplash kicks in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438335] Re: Boot messages show before xsplash kicks in
@Robbie Williamson: Thanks. Actually, I did convert to grub2 after posting, fwiw ;) -- Boot messages show before xsplash kicks in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431812] Re: i915: black screen on boot
Just wanted to add a me too. After choosing the kernel from the Grub menu, there's a good 10 second delay or so, then the textual boot process appears. I see usplash at what seems to be GDM loading. % lspci | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) 2.6.31-11-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Hopefully THIS is the issue I'm experiencing anyway ;) -- i915: black screen on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
