[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Thanks Lukasz, Christian, Robie, Matthias, and the various robots and launchpad janitors: appreciate your help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Hey Folks, Does the -proposed changes get automatically integrated to -updates after a certain time has passed, or does this require somebody to take action? It would be great to have this update rolled out to 18.04 before OVS 2.14 is released in a week or two. Regards, -Harry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Hi All, I have enabled the bionic-proposed repo as described in link. OVS-master is used for testing, containing the build-time binutils bug check as described above. 1) Can confirm that old binutils version (2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.3) had issue, and OVS was correctly DISabling AVX512. 2) Can confirm that with -proposed binutils (2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.4), OVS build system is correctly ENabling AVX512 support, as linker checks are passing. After the configure step, I have tested OVS, running traffic and enabling the AVX512 optimizations. It is working as expected, with AVX512 instructions running in the datapath. I believe you have already added the "verification-done" and bionic versions Christian, so I'll not change the status... please let me know if I misunderstood the process. Thanks Robie & Christian for your support on this issue! -Harry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Hi Christian, Thanks for the additional info! Confirm that with the PPA the proposed checks now pass: $ echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps 8: 0: 62 f1 7c 48 28 04 05vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0 Also the proposed OVS automake build-system changes will enable avx512 correctly: checking binutils avx512 assembler checks passing... yes I'll wait for the SRU team to accept into proposed. Regards, -Harry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Hey Folks, Apologies I'm not familiar with the SRU testing process. I'd like to help - have an 18.04 setup for testing here. Is there an easy way to add the test-build PPA and just do an apt update && apt install binutils? https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa- service/+archive/ubuntu/4105/+packages Regards, -Harry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Proposed patch on OVS Mailing list to check status at configure time for OVS 2.14 using the method Bruce mentioned above: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20200618165354.87787-7-harry.van.haa...@intel.com/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883880] Re: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Command to reproduce the issue: echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps The expected output is that the objdump output matches the vmovaps instruction input. When using binutils with the bug, the initial 0x40 will be incorrect. >From an Ubuntu 20.04 system: $ echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps 0: 62 f1 7c 48 28 04 05vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0 On an Ubuntu 18.04 system: $ echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps 0: 62 f1 7c 48 28 04 05vmovaps 0x1(,%rax,1),%zmm0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880 Title: fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827757] Re: PMF
A better workaround solution to this problem is the systemd wpa_supplicant.service override. This is better than messing with broken packages and versions. Here is my systemd override.conf (you can apply it with `systemctl edit wpa_supplicant`): [Service] Environment="LD_PRELOAD=/path_to_wpa_bundle_dir/libm.so.6" ExecStart= ExecStart=/path_to_wpa_bundle_dir/wpa_supplicant -u -s -O /run/wpa_supplicant is just a custom folder that consists of wpa_supplicant binary from package wpasupplicant_2.9-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb + libm-2.30.so from package libc6_2.30-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb and libm.so.6 which is a symlink to the libm-2.30.so in the same folder. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827757 Title: PMF To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1827757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827757] Re: PMF
Tests were performed with Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 card. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827757 Title: PMF To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1827757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827757] Re: PMF
Can confirm that this problem still exist on the latest LTS release. I tested connecting to enterprise network with enabled and required PMF ( Protected Management Frames / Management Protected Frames or 802.11w ) on Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS (with all updates) - all attempts failed, when the PMF was set to `Required` on the AP side. I also tested with my home setup: TP-Link AP ( OpenWrt 18.06.5 ) and 802.11w set to `Required` in the `Wireless Security` section. The current wpasupplicant version for 18.04 is 2:2.6-15ubuntu2.5 When the Network Manager tries to connect to the AP, it fails because the activation takes too long. I tested the Ubuntu 19.10 Eoan release and it seems that the wpasupplicant is able to connect to APs with Required PMF option. I found a workaround for Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic, but it is a bit "hacky/risky" - basically force upgraded the wpasupplicant and all deps with the packages from Ubuntu 19.10 Eoan. The dependency packages can be downloaded from https://packages.ubuntu.com Package versions: libnl-3-200_3.4.0-1_amd64.deb libnl-route-3-200_3.4.0-1_amd64.deb locales_2.30-0ubuntu2_all.deb libc-bin_2.30-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb libc6_2.30-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb libc6_2.30-0ubuntu2_i386.deb libtinfo6_6.1+20190803-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb libreadline8_8.0-3_amd64.deb wpasupplicant_2.9-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb NOTE: force upgrade this packages only if you are sure that they will not break your existing apps. If you are stuck with the LTS version, but you want the be able to connect to APs with mandatory PMF until this issue is resolved, you can try the workaround on your own risk (future LTS updates could break this setup). ** Tags added: 802.11w bionic pmf wpasupplicant -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827757 Title: PMF To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1827757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041063] Re: mouse pointer periodically leaps to left and top of screen with absolute pointing devices
Thanks a7x for the FIX!!! This fix applies also to the mouse crazy jumps on vmware + ubuntu 12.10 guest. Fix work - Confirmed. Please add this fix to the official release ASAP! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041063 Title: mouse pointer periodically leaps to left and top of screen with absolute pointing devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1041063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969154] Re: Unable to set 1920x1080 resolution in Ubuntu 12.04 Beta2 as a VMWare Workstation 8 guest
Hi to all :) I have temp fix for that. The long story short is: I just make configured xorg.conf file and copy it to /etc/X11. And of course RESTART! :) Now i have native 1080p without more issues/errors, but resolution is permanently locked to 1080p/60Hz If this is ok for you, here is the configured xorg.conf in the attachment. I know that is a temp fix, not proper fix, but ... This is the world of Linux :) Pls someone to test the fix and confirm :) ** Attachment added: "Temp fix for 1080p res vmware ubuntu guest that missing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/969154/+attachment/3245774/+files/xorg.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969154 Title: Unable to set 1920x1080 resolution in Ubuntu 12.04 Beta2 as a VMWare Workstation 8 guest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/969154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316081] Re: [Intrepid] Fails to detect laptop flatpanel screen (Intel 845 graphics, Dell Inspiron 1100)
I have a same problem I try to install ubuntu 8.10 gnome in my laptop dell inspiron 1100 -intel 82845G/GL and fisrt time I see only blak screen with X corsur mose but I did: 1) upgrate my bios version to A32 2) change the share ram to 8MB 3) remove the compiz 4) change splash to nosplash in grub/menu.lst 5) try any xorg.conf that I find by google (more than 10) same I change to: (attached file) but I get a error I change back my Xorg.conf to default and now I have this problem: my resolution is 600*800 attached files: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21232591/xorg.conf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21232654/Xorg.0.log.txt -- [Intrepid] Fails to detect laptop flatpanel screen (Intel 845 graphics, Dell Inspiron 1100) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286245] Re: unable to switch the screen resolution
I try to install ubuntu 8.10 gnome in my laptop dell inspiron 1100 -intel 82845G/GL and fisrt time I see only blak screen with X corsur mose but I did: 1) upgrate my bios version to A32 2) change the share ram to 8MB 3) remove the compiz 4) change splash to nosplash in grub/menu.lst 5) try any xorg.conf that I find by google (more than 10) same i change to: (attached file) but I get a error I change back my corg.conf to default and now I have this problem my resolution is 600*800 ** Attachment added: "xorg.conf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21232591/xorg.conf.txt -- unable to switch the screen resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286245] Re: unable to switch the screen resolution
xorg.0.log.txt ** Attachment added: "xorg.0.log.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21232654/Xorg.0.log.txt -- unable to switch the screen resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69526] Re: intel 845G using i810 driver freezes xorg
I have a same problem my reselotion in 600*800 and I cant change this dell inspiron 1100-intel 82845G/Gl ubuntu 8.10 ** Attachment added: "xorg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21231698/failsafeX-backup-090114015739.tar -- intel 845G using i810 driver freezes xorg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234185] Re: Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key.
also $ usb-creator --version gives 0.1.8 While synaptic confirms that the package version is indeed 0.1.10 -- Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234185] Re: Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key.
Reopening & confirming this bug in the 8.10 Release ** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234185] Re: Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key.
This bug is still reproducible in Ubuntu 8.10 Release Tested with usb-creater v0.1.8 with ubuntu-8.10-alternate-amd64.iso, (ISO's MD5sum checks out) But boot still gets stuck and keeps trying to read from CD drive -- Alternate CD cdrom-detect.postinst does not consider USB flash drive/key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290045] Re: system-config-lvm crashes on startup
Workaround is available #modprobe dm_mod then #system-config-lvm should work correctly This error only triggers on a fresh install, where the user hasen't rebooted yet which means dm_mod isn't loaded yet ** Changed in: system-config-lvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- system-config-lvm crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87054] Re: [Needs Packaging] Microdia SN9C201 webcam driver
1) Driver is reportedly working with Linux v2.6.27-x See success reports here https://groups.google.com/group/microdia/browse_thread/thread/dd27cb256652c5d1 2) DKMS driver source has been packaged for Intrepid/Hardy/Gutsy available here https://launchpad.net/~nickel62metal/+archive These packages are maintained directly by upstream driver developers https://groups.google.com/group/microdia/browse_thread/thread/954d27915c91457d For any further assistance email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- [Needs Packaging] Microdia SN9C201 webcam driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267675] Re: Test：111111
** Summary changed: - 11 + Test：11 ** Description changed: - 1.klskdlskldkaskd; - 2.ksdl;skd;lska;dlkas - 3.skdl;ksa;ldk;askd;as + This is the test case .sorry! -- Test：11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267698] [NEW] 22222
Public bug reported: 1.12112121212121 2.1212121211212 3.1212121212121 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267675] [NEW] 111111
Public bug reported: 1.klskdlskldkaskd; 2.ksdl;skd;lska;dlkas 3.skdl;ksa;ldk;askd;as ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87054] Re: SN9C201 webcam driver is not supported
A free driver for SN9C201 is under development at the following https://groups.google.com/group/microdia/ please join the effort. GSPCA has been promising SN9C201 support for over 2 years now, Linux-Projects driver is trialware /closed source and also has issues. Sonix themselves had released a binary only driver for FC6 All discussions about this driver/webcam at https://groups.google.com/group/microdia/ -- SN9C201 webcam driver is not supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66900] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
same bug is resolved on Toshiba Details at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84204 -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66900 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66900 ** Attachment added: "lspci -vvn, same deal" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7587703/lspci-09-05-2007.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66900 ** Attachment added: "dmesg as on 09-05-2007, without "irqpoll" boot parameter" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7587701/dmesg-09-05-2007.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66900 ** Attachment added: "dmesg as on 09-05-2007, no errors for now" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7587575/dmesg-09-05-2007.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66900 The errors have disappeared !! Here are the things I tried (i had been googling for so long i guess) Suggestion 1: adding boot option "irqpoll" Result: No effect Suggestion 2: Check BIOS software with intel's (firmwarekit-r1.iso) linux Result: No effect, 1 lousy warning, No Errors. Suggestion 3: Related to Broadcom h/w (no idea how to use that info) My H/W was Toshiba Satellite Pro A120, BIOS version was 1.3, I saw 2 updates available for A120 Series 1 update for PSAE0 1 update for PSAE1 I didn't know which model i had, PSAE0 or PSAE1 I used the BIOS UPDATE for PSAE1 http://support.toshiba-tro.de/tools/bios/tecra/a8/pta83/win/bios-330win.zip updated the BIOS from windows. Now i haven't received these errors yet ! will report back if problem persists, I guess Toshiba BIOS drivers for windows worked around the BIOS bugs, Linux did not have such luxury ! ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
How can I help you guys diagnose this problem further. I wish to help Ubuntu fully support Toshiba H/W. Please let me know it you need any further info. -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/84204 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
** Attachment added: "output of lspci -vv" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6395488/lspci-vv.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/84204 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
** Attachment added: "output of lspci -vvn" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6395461/lspci-vvn.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/84204 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Attached the dmesg output ** Attachment added: "Attached the dmesg output" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6370308/dmesg-08-0-2007.txt -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/84204 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84204] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
5750] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code - [7.896126] Freeing SMP alternatives: 11k freed - [7.896286] ACPI: Core revision 20060707 - [ 7.900856] CPU0: Intel Genuine Intel(R) CPU T1350 @ 1.86GHz stepping 08 - [7.900895] Total of 1 processors activated (3729.35 BogoMIPS). - [7.901233] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs - [7.901498] ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 - [8.047350] Brought up 1 CPUs - [8.047767] Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware - [8.047863] NET: Registered protocol family 16 - [8.048017] EISA bus registered - [8.048020] ACPI: bus type pci registered - [8.048045] PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at f000 is not E820-reserved - [8.048146] PCI: Not using MMCONFIG. - [8.048385] PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd823, last bus=4 - [8.048386] PCI: Using configuration type 1 - [8.048388] Setting up standard PCI resources - [8.054356] ACPI: Interpreter enabled - [8.054358] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing - [8.055505] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *10) - [8.056157] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.056794] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.057526] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.058159] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.058792] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.059552] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.060184] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) - [8.060559] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (:00) - [8.060563] PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) - [8.061724] ACPI: Assume root bridge [\_SB_.PCI0] bus is 0 - [8.062048] Boot video device is :00:02.0 - [8.063028] PCI quirk: region d800-d87f claimed by ICH6 ACPI/GPIO/TCO - [8.063032] PCI quirk: region eec0-eeff claimed by ICH6 GPIO - [8.064534] PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0 - [8.064654] PCI: Bus #04 (-#07) is hidden behind transparent bridge #03 (-#04) (try 'pci=assign-busses') - [8.064656] Please report the result to linux-kernel to fix this permanently - [8.064726] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] - [8.069694] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT] - [8.074945] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PEX1._PRT] - [8.075316] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.MPEX._PRT] - [8.076635] Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay - [8.076643] pnp: PnP ACPI init - [8.088073] pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices - [8.088076] PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP - [8.088162] PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing - [8.088164] PCI: If a device doesn't work, try "pci=routeirq". If it helps, post a report - [8.088227] PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 0 of device :02:00.0 - [8.100449] pnp: 00:09: ioport range 0x1e0-0x1ef has been reserved - [8.100863] PCI: Ignore bogus resource 6 [0:0] of :00:02.0 - [8.100921] PCI: Bridge: :00:1c.0 - [8.100924] IO window: b000-bfff - [8.100928] MEM window: ffc0-ffcf - [8.100949] PREFETCH window: disabled. - [8.100980] PCI: Bridge: :00:1c.2 - [8.100982] IO window: disabled. - [8.100986] MEM window: 3a00-3a0f - [8.100990] PREFETCH window: disabled. - [8.101024] PCI: Bus 4, cardbus bridge: :03:0b.0 - [8.101043] IO window: 1000-10ff - [8.101048] IO window: 1400-14ff - [8.101052] PREFETCH window: 3000-33ff - [8.101056] MEM window: 3400-37ff - [8.101077] PCI: Bridge: :00:1e.0 - [8.101080] IO window: 1000-1fff - [8.101085] MEM window: 3400-39ff - [8.101088] PREFETCH window: 3000-33ff - [8.101145] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1c.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 - [8.101151] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1c.0 to 64 - [8.101201] PCI: Enabling device :00:1c.2 ( -> 0002) - [8.101205] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1c.2[C] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 - [8.101211] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1c.2 to 64 - [8.101238] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1e.0 to 64 - [8.101267] PCI: Enabling device :03:0b.0 ( -> 0003) - [8.101271] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:0b.0[A] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 - [8.101309] NET: Registered protocol family 2 - [8.139226] IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) - [8.139353] TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) - [8.139546] TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) - [8.139642] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 8192) - [8.139661] TCP reno registered - [8.151316] checking if image is initramfs... it is - [9.383409] Freeing init
