[Bug 669142] Re: if-up.d/if-down.d scripts restart iSCSI inappropriately
This affected me, Today I was adding a new interface and when I ifdown it it stop iscsi service which caused multipath to fail, and then LVM and a few KVM guests, I think you should remove this script from if-down.d and if-up.d because it causes more damages than it helps. It happend in ubuntu server 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669142 Title: if-up.d/if-down.d scripts restart iSCSI inappropriately To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/669142/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620994] Re: linux 2.6.24-28.75 breaks xen flavours (xen kernel bug: 'kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/debian/build/custom-source-xen/mm/memory.c:2704')
I tested 2.6.24-28.77~pre6 on a few test amd64 machines and both dom0 and domu works fine, domus, are i386 and amd64, I will do more tests on more servers this weekend. Thanks Stefan!!! -- linux 2.6.24-28.75 breaks xen flavours (xen kernel bug: 'kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/debian/build/custom-source-xen/mm/memory.c:2704') https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 579924] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10
Jim Padel wrote: I would like to confirm both posts. The package from the repos only contain the 11 to 12 update scripts, but to get the 10 to 11 scripts you must obtain the source code from bacula.org, as far as I can tell they do not come with the distro package. I guess you can also download the bacula deb sources: # cd /usr/src # apt-get source bacula -- Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 579924] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10
Jim Padel wrote: I would like to confirm both posts. The package from the repos only contain the 11 to 12 update scripts, but to get the 10 to 11 scripts you must obtain the source code from bacula.org, as far as I can tell they do not come with the distro package. I guess you can also download the bacula deb sources: # cd /usr/src # apt-get source bacula -- Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515402] Re: sarg: getword loop detected (bug in utils.c, name_month function?)
I have a few squid3+sarg installations and run without problems, probably this is not a sarg bug but squid3 default config, the default /etc/squid3/squid.conf has a default logformat which incluides one space after the fist entry on access.log, I always uncomment the line and remove the extra space char. I hope this can help, I have never had the need to recompile sarg since dapper, of course I always uncomment the logformat directive and remove the extra space. Best regards. -- sarg: getword loop detected (bug in utils.c, name_month function?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332833] Re: pam_mount(pam_mount.c:100): unknown pam_mount option use_first_pass
I just upgraded from intrepid to jaunty and got same problem about unknown option use_first_pass, readming new pam_mount man page I see that use_fist_pass option is no longer needed, previous man page uses use_first_pass, you you only need to remove those options from module and that is all. However, I think that there should be a dialog warning about this change when upgrading libpam_mount, probably recommeding manual removal or something. -- pam_mount(pam_mount.c:100): unknown pam_mount option use_first_pass https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262291] Re: hardy: update samba to 3.0.32
And most important, that but is about samba 3.2.x == == Subject: Wrong permissions of group_mapping.ldb == == CVE ID#: CVE-2008-3789 == == Versions:Samba 3.2.0 - 3.2.2 (inclusive) and I dont think 3.2 will be in hardy because 3.2 has a new licence, this needs extra work, and I think 3.0.28 it is enough. I think this bug can be closed, isn't it, because it doesnt apply to samba version on hardy. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-3789 -- hardy: update samba to 3.0.32 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 262291] Re: hardy: update samba to 3.0.32
And most important, that but is about samba 3.2.x == == Subject: Wrong permissions of group_mapping.ldb == == CVE ID#: CVE-2008-3789 == == Versions:Samba 3.2.0 - 3.2.2 (inclusive) and I dont think 3.2 will be in hardy because 3.2 has a new licence, this needs extra work, and I think 3.0.28 it is enough. I think this bug can be closed, isn't it, because it doesnt apply to samba version on hardy. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-3789 -- hardy: update samba to 3.0.32 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
