[Bug 779323] Re: Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779323 Title: Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779323] [NEW] Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H with embedded ATI Radeon HD3200 Video Card: ATI Radeon HD3650 Without fglrx installed, the system would reboot as soon as X is started (before login screen) This occurred on the live cd, however enabling all of the options in the F6 menu allowed the live cd to boot into the 2d gnome. I then installed it to the hard drive thinking that I could try various configurations. The most interesting thing is that booting into the recovery console and selecting failsafeX causes the system to boot as well. I removed the video card and and booted with the on board card and the same problem existed. I also tried the ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/ppa to see if there was a newer driver, however I do not recall any changes. The solution was to install the fglrx driver. I had a thread on the forum about this while I was trying various things: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1751760 This bug was filed with ubuntu-bug while using the fglrx driver, let me know if there is anything that is needed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,animation,snap,expo,move,compiztoolbox,place,grid,imgpng,gnomecompat,wall,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,resize,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,session,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Sat May 7 20:56:29 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: fglrx, 8.841, 2.6.38-8-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: ATI Technologies Inc Mobility Radeon HD 3600 Series [1002:9598] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: PC Partner Limited Device [174b:e410] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) JockeyStatus: xorg:fglrx - ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use) MachineType: Unknow Unknow ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=UUID=3d4b047e-22e9-4b04-9acb-cacdbaf5e435 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display Title: Xorg freeze UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/17/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc. dmi.bios.version: 12b dmi.board.name: RS780-SB700 dmi.board.version: Unknox dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Unknow dmi.chassis.version: Unknow dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvr12b:bd08/17/2010:svnUnknow:pnUnknow:pvrUnknow:rvn:rnRS780-SB700:rvrUnknox:cvnUnknow:ct3:cvrUnknow: dmi.product.name: Unknow dmi.product.version: Unknow dmi.sys.vendor: Unknow version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu2 version.fglrx-installer: fglrx-installer N/A version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu13 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 freeze natty patch running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779323 Title: Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770480] Re: Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770480 Title: Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770480] [NEW] Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity While installing Natty beta2 from USB flash drive, I was unable to complete the install due to the installer not being able to unmount /dev/sda10: Apr 25 11:43:51 ubuntu ubiquity: umount: cannot umount /dev/sda10 -- /dev/sda6 is mounted over it on the same point. Apr 25 11:44:06 ubuntu ubiquity: umount: cannot umount /dev/sda10 -- /dev/sda6 is mounted over it on the same point. Apr 25 11:44:18 ubuntu ubiquity[4551]: Reverting lockdown the desktop environment. Apr 25 11:44:19 ubuntu activate-dmraid: No Serial ATA RAID disks detected Apr 25 11:44:19 ubuntu ubiquity: umount: /target: device is busy. Apr 25 11:44:19 ubuntu ubiquity: (In some cases useful info about processes that use Apr 25 11:44:19 ubuntu ubiquity: the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) Apr 25 11:44:19 ubuntu ubiquity: It appears that multiple filesystems have been mounted on /target: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on aufs 869M 163M 662M 20% / none 1.7G 724K 1.7G 1% /dev /dev/sdb1 2.0G 1.6G 387M 81% /cdrom /dev/loop0656M 656M 0 100% /rofs none 1.7G 1.4M 1.7G 1% /dev/shm tmpfs 1.7G 68K 1.7G 1% /tmp none 1.7G 96K 1.7G 1% /var/run none 1.7G 4.0K 1.7G 1% /var/lock /dev/sda12 11G 2.5G 8.0G 24% /target /dev/sda13 11G 2.5G 8.0G 24% /target/home /dev/sda10 11G 2.5G 8.0G 24% /target /dev/sda11 11G 2.5G 8.0G 24% /target/home /dev/sda6 11G 2.5G 8.0G 24% /target The partition that is actually mounted on /target is the newly installed partition: ubuntu@ubuntu:/$ cat /target/etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=natty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu Natty (development branch)" /proc/mounts does not show the extra partitions being mounted: ubuntu@ubuntu:/$ cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=1727568k,nr_inodes=431892,mode=755 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/sdb1 /cdrom vfat rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro 0 0 /dev/loop0 /rofs squashfs ro,noatime 0 0 /dev/loop1 /cow ext3 rw,noatime,errors=continue,barrier=0,data=ordered 0 0 aufs / aufs rw,noatime,si=8dfd2b3e7eb58761 0 0 none /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0 none /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,relatime 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0 none /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 0 0 none /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 /dev/sda12 /target ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 proc /target/proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 sysfs /target/sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 none /target/dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=1727568k,nr_inodes=431892,mode=755 0 0 gvfs-fuse-daemon /home/ubuntu/.gvfs fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=999,group_id=999 0 0 ubuntu@ubuntu:/$ cat /etc/mtab aufs / aufs rw 0 0 none /proc proc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw 0 0 none /dev devtmpfs rw,mode=0755 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620 0 0 /dev/sdb1 /cdrom vfat rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro 0 0 /dev/loop0 /rofs squashfs ro,noatime 0 0 none /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw 0 0 none /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0 tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0 none /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 0 0 none /var/lock tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 /dev/sda12 /target ext4 rw,errors=remount-ro 0 0 /dev/sda13 /target/home ext4 rw 0 0 /dev/sda10 /target ext4 rw 0 0 /dev/sda11 /target/home ext4 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /target ext3 rw 0 0 /dev /target/dev none rw,bind 0 0 gvfs-fuse-daemon /home/ubuntu/.gvfs fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon rw,nosuid,nodev,user=ubuntu 0 0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ubiquity 2.6.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 25 12:38:53 2011 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta amd64 (20110413) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided St
[Bug 740011] Re: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup
I am having this problem with the beta2 live cd (64bit) I started writing about the issue on the forum: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1733315 ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I was able to boot by disabling all of the F6 options. I will try to isolate the option that allowed the boot later today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740011 Title: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] Re: Configuration Dialogs should not steal focus during updates
I haven't had any updates that have brought up the dpkg screen, such as when there is a custom config file, and a update might overwrite that file. I think I may have been using grub1 when I first reported this bug. Having non-default settings in menu.lst was one of the things that triggered this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 Title: Configuration Dialogs should not steal focus during updates -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559202] Re: xorg wrong window selected when clicking title bar
This could be a duplicate of 494096: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/494096 It should be fixed in 10.10, but so far, it doesn't look like a fix is released for 10.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559202 Title: xorg wrong window selected when clicking title bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
@jh: You might be experiencing a different bug, since both 32bit and 64bit guests are unusable with vmmouse installed. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
http://alinux.tv/Kernel-2.6.34/trace/mmiotrace.txt Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, or use $ dmesg to view your kernel log and look for "mmiotrace has lost events" warning. If events were lost, the trace is incomplete. You should enlarge the buffers and try again. Buffers are enlarged by first seeing how large the current buffers are: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb gives you a number. Approximately double this number and write it back, for instance: $ echo 128000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb Then start again from the top. -- Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
Package: ureadahead State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 0.100.0-4.1.1 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
Ureadahead is not creating pack files now. $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 128000 $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 1408 $ ls /var/lib/ureadahead/ debugfs I was using a custom version before, the proposed patch should have overwritten it though. Can someone else confirm that the patch is not creating pack files? -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated
Running Maverick in a vm. Update manager says: Your system is up-to-date The package information was last updated 20 days ago. This was using version 1:0.141 If the package information is older than a day old, it should only say when the package information was last updated. Not give the user a false sense of security. -- Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
@Julian: Does removing xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse from the client fix the issue? Also, what cpu do you have? I am wondering if this might be unique to AMD processors. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575877] Re: gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup
There are three bugs here: - Keyring is not unlocked when user logs in with password. - Keyring steals focus with always on top dialog (frustrating when you are in the middle of typing something) - Keyring doesn't provide information about what application is requiring the keyring. This should be considered a security flaw since the dialog is asking the user to blindly provide a password without reason. If mimicked by a web popup, a user can have their password phished. -- gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301203] Re: slabtop --once seems to exit without output
This appears to still be an issue in Lucid slabtop -V procps version 3.2.8 slabtop --once > slabtop.txt cat slabtop.txt shows nothing, but the file size is 1518 bytes. head slabtop.txt will show the file as long as the last line isn't displayed. top -n 1 > top.txt creates a readable file -- slabtop --once seems to exit without output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590455] Re: mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49775389/Dependencies.txt -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590455] [NEW] mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountmanager If sudo has been used for another program within the sudo time limit, starting mountmanager will automatically run with root privileges. For example the following commands will cause fstab to be rewritten without user consent: sudo ls mm The command should be considered a destructive command since it makes changes to the system immediately on startup. The mm script should either require an admin password, require the user to use the sudo command, or not make changes to the system. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mountmanager 0.2.6-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 6 11:56:56 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: mountmanager ** Affects: mountmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363550] Re: mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup
Just running mountmanager clears all comments from my fstab without asking the user about saving any changes. Combined with running with admin privileges without the users knowledge, this is very dangerous. -- mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning
Refreshing the package list by clicking "Check" button in update-manager allows the installation of the updates with the "Install Updates" Button. -- update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow
I cannot recreate the issue in lucid. -- update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears
A couple of my family members liked the timer for the same reason Hellenion mentioned. It would seem that allowing the user to configure this behaviour would be the best way to go about this even if it is only configurable with gconf. -- Shutdown timer no longer appears https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345374] Re: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet
Why is this bug marked incomplete? Doesn't incomplete mean that more information is needed? -- Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582432] Re: update manager should cache changelog information by url
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48674263/Dependencies.txt -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582432] [NEW] update manager should cache changelog information by url
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Currently update-manager will download the same changelogs multiple times if there are multiple packages with the same changelog. Example: Today I started wireshark to capture packets. Started update manager The first package listed was apt and it downloaded the changelog automatically wireshark caught this request: 48 8.591803192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 63 8.923160192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 Then I selected the next package: apt-transport-https wireshark reported: 95 13.335957 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 110 13.665300 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 The next package: apt-utils 144 17.995672 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 159 18.331389 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 This is a waste of bandwidth and server resources. update-manager could cache each changelog in a dictionary by url key. Doing this could greatly reduce the number of requests the changelog server receives. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 18 13:15:52 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582102] [NEW] Provide a method to ignore certain files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Wishlist: I noticed that dropbox can have a significant impact on boot time. I personally do not consider it to be essential to the boot loading experience, but if I happen to have the daemon set to start automatically, ureadahead will trace many files read by it. (The largest entries in my home.pack are dropbox files.) I can work around this issue by manually retracing with dropbox disabled, or delay the start of it. What happens if I play a movie right after boot? Or transmission starts seeding a torrent while ureadahead profiles? Will those files be included in a pack file? Hardcoding an ignore list is not practical for every circumstance. Maybe a config file could be read by ureadahead, with a list of rules to follow such as ignoring files by size, extension, and path. Another option could be to use a separate program to purge pack file entries based on a config file. ** Affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Provide a method to ignore certain files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)
According to this site: http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2008/05/asus-eee-pc-ssd-read-and-write-tests-4g.html 32MB/s seems about right for a 16g 900. The 4g version reaches 44MB/s. I thought kerneloops was disabled in the final release, but it is shown in your bootcharts. Are you sure you are running the latest updates? -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)
This could be a bug with the drive itself. 32MB/s seems really slow for a SSD. Maybe it would help if you post the specifics about your drive: sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
The high cpu usage was on the host only when the mouse on the guest was being moved rapidly. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
Setting the live cd to run in safe mode works around the issue. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579523] Re: update should avoid being run when on the battery
I stand corrected, anacron does avoid running when on battery. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579523] [NEW] update should avoid being run when on the battery
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index Currently apt-xapian-index uses a significant amount of cpu while updating. If the battery level is low at the time of the update, the sudden increase in cpu usage could lead to a loss of the users data. I propose doing a check for if the system is running on battery, and postponing the job until a later time. /etc/cron.daily/mlocate checks for if on the battery, and could be used as a basis. It could be a better idea to request anacron implement a battery check instead. ** Affects: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563076] Re: apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache
If you delete the index, does it automatically rebuild itself, or does the user have to manually initiate the updater? The information is automatically generated on a weekly basis. Also it isn't a cache file, so why should it be stored in the cache folder? -- apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU
some commands don't really need a space for values: ps aux|head -n1 is the same as ps aux|head -n 1 -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU
I don't think the space makes a difference: Without the space: ionice -p 3477 idle with the space: ionice -p 3525 idle -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
This bug exists in karmic also. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
I posted a upstart script that can recover the memory used after a profile: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9271524&postcount=9 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
"should really raise a warning if ../base-dont-touch.img is smaller than 10GB" Here you are saying if the forked image is larger than the base image. "If QEmu doesn't handle a differnent size, even a bigger one, I don't see why qemu-img create -b ... should take a size argument at all." I just showed that there is a reason why there is a size argument. If the issue is when the forked image is smaller than the base, I suspect that the issue is that the filesystem was not reduced in size first, kvm-img is not responsible for this. Did you remember to shrink your partitions before shrinking the image size? Also, you do not need to include a size when using -b with the kvm-image create. Are you intentionally trying to reduce the disk size? Why? If you are trying to recover space on the host system, you can zero out the free space on the guest (bleachbit can do this) then convert your image using -c to compress the image...then use that image as a base image. Qcow2 images only use up what is needed. -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@Petar: I replied to your comment at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1363165 I do not think this bug is related to your issue. I would like to help you figure out what is going on, but not here. To everyone else: The cause of the bug is known. Maybe Scott can give us some insight on when or how it will be addressed, but the forums might be a better place for discussions. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577592] Re: qemu-kvm dependencies require X
The guest is not required to use SDL though. The guest could use a vnc connection (I don't think audio is available when using a vnc connection either.) Although I am not sure of the actual issue with having X installed though. Is the issue the extra space used? If so, wouldn't the extra space be small in comparison to any vm images on the machine? -- qemu-kvm dependencies require X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
I am sure it is taken seriously. The dev is likely tending to more important issues at the moment. The issue isn't a security issue, and it doesn't seem to cause any data loss. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
What image format is the base image? I just tested with qcow2 format and increased the size from 6g to 10g just fine (of course the file system size remained the same) kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 -f qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G If you don't specify a format I think raw is used: kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G Unknown option 'backing_file' qemu-img: Backing file not supported for file format 'raw' Try using kvm-img info [imagefile] to see what format is being used. -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I am attempting to install Lubuntu, but I am getting the same behavior with the live cd (there is no alt install yet). The problem here is that clicking install causes the screen to flicker and the installation dialog keeps moving down...I suspect this to be caused by this bug since I have experienced similar issues when running ubuntu with kvm and vmmouse active. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@james79: if the issue is that you are low on memory, you can release the trace buffer with: echo 1|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb I wrote a init script that does this automatically after a trace. I can clean it up and post it if it will help. If the issue is that you run out of memory during boot, your only option is to disable ureadahead. Ureadahead is only useful if you have the memory for caching the files. I suspect fixing this bug would be counter productive if the goal is to change the way tracing is accomplished. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 18661] Re: Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp
/tmp was a subdir of / in Karmic on my systems. -- Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized
The issue seems to be fixed now. -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@Petar: I don't think this bug is your issue if uninstalling ureadahead didn't help. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562774] Re: (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44114436/Dependencies.txt -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562774] [NEW] (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp When starting yelp from the command line I get the following: --- (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed --- Yelp seems to be functioning properly otherwise. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: yelp 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 23:32:54 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559525] [NEW] Trace should ignore files in /var/log
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Looking at the dump of my pack file, I see many log files listed. These files are constantly changing so it doesn't make much sense to store their information in the pack file. The files are more likely stored in more distant locations of the filesystem, which could increase unwanted head movement. Also since they get rotated more frequently than the pack file is updated, the trace information will be invalid anyway. Solution: add /var/log to the list of ignored paths (trace.c:ignore_path) if (! strncmp (pathname, "/var/log/", 9)) return TRUE; ** Affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Trace should ignore files in /var/log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557887] [NEW] URL in description ends with a period
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notification-daemon Viewing the information for popup notifications with ubuntu software center: The hyperlink includes the final period in the description. This is minor, but should be an easy fix. The simple solution is to remove the period. A better solution would be to use the Homepage field. ** Affects: notification-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- URL in description ends with a period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
Nevermind about ureadahead. I uninstalled it and got the same behavior. -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
also after a successful reboot, I get a crash report for plymouthd (#553745) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
Could ureadahead have something to do with this? I noticed this on my laptop when fooling around with ureadahead. After testing in a vm I can do the following: sudo touch /forcefsck reboot. fsck stalls at 70% for a sec, and the screen jumps directly to the desktop. ls / shows forcefsck still exists for about 40 secs. After removing the pack file for ureadahead and touching /forcefsck again...rebooting gets me a disk check to 70% and the screen goes blank, and it doesn't seem to ever bring up the desktop. host cpu usage is idle. I can ctrl-alt-f1 and log in. /var/lib/ureadahead/pack was created. /forcefsck is never removed next reboot, disk check appears again (because forcefsck wasn't removed), and the desktop is loaded. /forcefsck is removed. It is possible that the above users have been experiencing issues because many updates trigger a reprofile (such as installing/removing the nvidia driver) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552165] Re: ureadahead should be disabled by default
Disabling ureadahead by default does not seem like a reasonable solution. There might be another problem that is compounded by ureadahead. It might help if you post a bootchart. You might want to look at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 -- ureadahead should be disabled by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
I see 128000 kb was hardcoded into the source of ureadahead. I also see in mmiotrace.txt where this is used as an example: --- Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, or use $ dmesg to view your kernel log and look for "mmiotrace has lost events" warning. If events were lost, the trace is incomplete. You should enlarge the buffers and try again. Buffers are enlarged by first seeing how large the current buffers are: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb gives you a number. Approximately double this number and write it back, for instance: $ echo 128000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb Then start again from the top. --- The size of the trace buffer actually used can be determined with wc -c /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace (The size will be in bytes) So far I have seen sizes range from 2-30Mb I have yet to check some of my larger systems, but it seems possible that 128M could be necessary in some cases. ... I have found a hackish solution for recovering the memory after the profile. First ensure the profile is complete (it waits a while even after you log in) by checking that the pack files exist. You should also check that they are somewhat recent too since I don't know if a reprofile triggered by age will remove these files. You can then recover the memory by reducing the buffer size: echo 2048|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 2048 was just an arbitrary size. You can use 1 if you really want to save memory. I do not know of the consequences of resizing the buffer afterwards, but it seems to work fine. @Scott: Could you provide some feedback if this is a reasonable solution for the time being? -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
It was mentioned in this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 that once online profiling is implemented, this issue will go away. I am wondering if a bug needs to be filed for the kernel because there is nothing to indicate that the memory is being used for tracing memory. Using tools like ps just shows that memory isn't being accounted for. -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
If I am using kvm-qemu and not VMware, should the vmmouse driver be active? I will double check with the vmmouse_detect thing, but xorg is logging: (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_INIT (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_ON (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enabled ... (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode My version of kvm-qemu on the host is: QEMU PC emulator version 0.11.0 (qemu-kvm-0.11.0) -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
vmmouse_detect; echo $? produces 1, should that mean something? -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
If I attempt to move the mouse from one end of the screen to the other, it pauses half way in between and cpu usage goes to 80% - 100% (measured in htop) The lack of responsiveness makes it unusable. I will try jaunty and see...I don't recall having this issue with it. Removing vmmouse is a solution for me, but I don't think this should be ignored. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I get the same result booting from the live cds: kvm -m 1024 -cdrom ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso kvm -m 1024 -cdrom lucid-desktop-amd64.iso lucid-desktop-amd64.iso is the daily-cd md5sums: d88edd4c3640e2c90dd2bce16dbe86ae lucid-desktop-amd64.iso 7341b637218cf9a9b2334293c3df7e94 ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso Host info: *-cpu product: AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e vendor: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] physical id: 1 bus info: c...@0 size: 2500MHz capacity: 2500MHz width: 64 bits capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp x86-64 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good extd_apicid pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch cpufreq uname -a Linux Shredder 2.6.31-21-generic #59-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 24 07:28:27 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 Codename: karmic -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
kvm /storage/greg/vm/Lucid_64.qcow2 -m 1024 -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I removed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 and installed 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4 from launchpad, and the system was responsive after reboot. Then, I installed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 back and the system had poor response again after reboot. What I don't understand though is that prior to today I had 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4, but I had responsiveness issues then too. I could try a fresh install tomorrow and see if I get the same results. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754836/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754837/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754838/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog1.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754839/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog2.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754840/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754841/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754842/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754843/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754844/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754845/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754846/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754847/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754848/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754849/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754851/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754852/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754853/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754854/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754856/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754857/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754858/xkbcomp.txt -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] [NEW] [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse Running lucid beta1 64bit in kvm-qemu vm: Sometime prior to beta1, system was responsive. Now I can barely move the mouse without causing one of the cpus on the host machine to peg out. And /usr/bin/X using all of the cpu resources on the guest machine. After removing the xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse package and rebooting, the system becomes responsive again. Subsequent reboot was responsive too. After reinstalling the package, the system became sluggish again. I notice in the changelog that 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu2 through ubuntu4 were released 2010-03-02 to 05. This is about the time this issue occurred. 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu3 had a change regarding kvm detection: * debian/patches/enable-detect-in-kvm.patch: add iopl() back so vmmouse_detect will work in kvm again. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-18.27-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-18-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDmesg: [ 16.901084] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Thu Apr 1 01:53:32 2010 DkmsStatus: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318) Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1: ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-18-generic root=UUID=38e6f1bb-c94a-4683-9951-fc0b49f6f23e ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: QEMU dmi.bios.version: QEMU dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnQEMU:bvrQEMU:bd01/01/2007:svn:pn:pvr:cvn:ct1:cvr: system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-18-generic ** Affects: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137388] Re: LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be
I just noticed this in a qemu vm with lucid. Desktop effects is not enabled, but launching the terminal with ctrl-alt-T I get direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) If I launch from the menu or alt-f2 then gnome-terminal I get yes. I am trying to troubleshoot some other weirdness and thinking the I didn't have direct rendering really threw me off track. Why is this the normal behavior? -- LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart
Could some sort of notice be displayed since other options take effect without reloading or restarting. The current behavior appears broken when there is no feedback of any kind. -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550623] Re: hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333874/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333875/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333876/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333877/ProcAttrCurrent.gz ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333878/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333879/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333880/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333881/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333883/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Visibility changed to: Private -- hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42316282/Dependencies.txt -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] [NEW] changes to indention options require restart
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: geany Steps to recreate: open preferences>editor>indentation tab Change type (tabs to spaces or spaces to tabs) click OK The change doesn't take effect until geany is restarted. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: geany 0.18-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Mar 28 16:30:46 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: geany ** Affects: geany Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: geany (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42075108/Dependencies.txt -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548996] [NEW] high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Click "more info" on a package. Maximize the window. Look at cpu usage, it will be really high (80-100%) and stay that way until you restore the window size or get out of the package detail page. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 12:30:13 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: software-center 1.1.21 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: software-center Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548386] Re: Wrong Ubuntu Icon used
Isn't it still the official logo? -- Wrong Ubuntu Icon used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537418] Re: Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen
Something to also note is that clicking on the empty box displays an Ubuntu logo. So it seems that the logo should be displayed here, and not a blank image. -- Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548937] Re: image not saved correctly on close
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42067469/Dependencies.txt -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548937] [NEW] image not saved correctly on close
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot Steps to reproduce: Take a screenshot. Note the file size (mine were usually about 560k) Open the file in f-spot. Crop the image as small as possible. Exit f-spot, and click save. Look at the file size of the image: It didn't change. (560k for a 15x23 png) Repeat the above steps except save the file prior to exiting, and the resulting file size is more reasonable. (< 1k) I also tested this with a jpeg and got the same results. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 11:21:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: f-spot 0.6.1.5-2ubuntu5 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: f-spot Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
** Attachment added: "screenshot of button corruption" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066750/Screenshot-Ubuntu%20Software%20Center.png -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066220/Dependencies.txt -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] [NEW] resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center If I resize the left pane back and forth, the forward and back buttons get distorted. I tested this on my laptop which is using the opensource radeon driver, and also using a qemu vm. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 11:06:07 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: software-center 1.1.21 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: software-center Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548911] Re: package details shows a shadow when no image is available
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42064045/Dependencies.txt -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548911] [NEW] package details shows a shadow when no image is available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Find a package that doesn't have a screenshot such as Biloba or 7zip. Click on "more info" to go to view the package details. A blank white screenshot is displayed with a drop shadow. The drop shadow gives the appearance that something is broken. Since clicking on the blank screenshot displays an Ubuntu logo, it seems that this is supposed to be the image displayed instead of the blank image. Displaying anything but a blank image will correct this bug. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 10:44:06 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: software-center 1.1.21 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: software-center Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
Strike my last comment, it does it with packages that do have a screenshot. Openoffice.org Word Processor is one. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
I guess my issue requires a separate bug report. The issue I have only occurs when you view details of a package when the package doesn't have a screenshot and the window is maximized. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
Just noticed this today on my lucid -32bit machine. Open software center, maximize the window, choose a package and click more info. Cpu usage jumps really high until you restore the window size or get out of the info page. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears
Looking at the source of gtk-logout-helper.c from indicator-session-0.2.7:
in session_action():
if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_LOG_OUT) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy, "Logout",
INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_UINT, 1, G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
} else if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_SHUTDOWN) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy,
"RequestShutdown", INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
} else if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_RESTART) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy,
"RequestReboot", INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
---
why use dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout () if there isn't supposed to be a
timeout?
I did notice that there was a switch to use dialog.c instead of logout-
dialog.c where logout-dialog.c sets the timeout value and dialog.c
doesn't.
The only thing in the changelog is for 0.2.5:
* New logout dialogs.
What was this change for?
--
Shutdown timer no longer appears
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
Just found out about /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb It reads 128000 on my vm which is currently showing about 322M (tracing on) 182M (tracing off) diff=140M so it looks like it is the tracing buffer. Some questions: 1. Why is it that no application can differentiate memory used by the tracing buffer...it just looks like missing memory to everything. Is this because the tracing feature of the kernel is still new? 2. What determines the tracing buffer size? Is this a preset value? 3. Is there a way to determine how much of the tracing buffer is getting used? Being that the minimum memory requirement for Xubuntu is 256M and 384M for Ubuntu...does it seem wise to use half of the memory for boot optimization? Maybe a temporary fix could be to have ureadahead do nothing on systems with less than 512M of memory. Systems with this restriction would likely be old and too slow for a user to care about boot speeds anyway...especially if using ureadahead is causing the system to swap. I am curious if ureadahead would still work if the tracing buffer size was something like 32M. 32M would be small enough for users to ignore. I don't know a lot about how tracing works, but it might be nice to have a kernel option to set the buffer size, or even control tracing. -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523072] Re: No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel
I am having the same problem except I am using the open source radeon driver. enabling pm_trace yielded this result: [0.601249] Magic number: 0:523:740 [0.601295] hash matches /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/base/power/main.c:471 Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 Codename: lucid -- No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543899] Re: import visual causes segfault
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41579040/Dependencies.txt -- import visual causes segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543899] [NEW] import visual causes segfault
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-visual Steps to reproduce in python: -- Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Mar 20 2010, 14:40:09) [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import visual Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- dmesg output: [ 1815.676221] python[1591]: segfault at 18 ip 7ff1fe4f17b4 sp 78f92270 error 6 in libstdc++.so.6.0.13[7ff1fe428000+f6000] This was tested in a kvm-qemu vm running Ubuntu 10.04 beta-1 64bit It also occurred on the host machine running 9.10 64bit The original problem was noted on the forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1326593 This issue seems different from the other bugs posted because the segfault occurs during the import process while other bugs show it occurring after calling a function or method. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 21 22:52:33 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318) Package: python-visual 1:5.12-1.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: python-visual Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: python-visual (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- import visual causes segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531823] Re: [lucid] All linux guests oops in kvm_leave_lazy_mmu during boot (9.04, 9.10, 10.04)
I am experiencing some poor performance with beta-1 in qemu-kvm (didn't have this issue last month.) Would the removal of the patches (mentioned in comment #14) be the cause of this? I am using an AMD host, and just moving the mouse will cause the host cpu to spike. I tested an image of karmic, and everything works. -- [lucid] All linux guests oops in kvm_leave_lazy_mmu during boot (9.04, 9.10, 10.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528543] Re: Optimize battery lifespan option
The 40% limit is for if you plan to store your battery. I would not recomend operating a portable device at such a low capacity. Most manufactures seem to agree that charging a battery to the full capacity can reduce the life expectancy of the battery, but this seems to be in 80-95% area. Should software override the manufacturer's implementation? -- Optimize battery lifespan option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
This may need to fall under another bug report: Today I booted into recovery mode to recover some data from a failed drive, then resumed the normal boot into a console. I then moved a large number of files from one drive to another. During the transfer I thought that the system was acting sluggish so I switched to console 2 and started htop. Htop showed that all of my memory (4g) was in use and my swap was pretty much full (994/996M.) using df I saw that /var/lib/ureadahead/debugfs was listed so apparently ureadahead was profiling my actions while in single user mode. Maybe ureadahead should not run in single mode. -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424706] Re: libbluetooth3 removal would remove evolution
What is the problem with leaving this package installed? It is not a very large package. If you are trying to go lightweight, you could try other email clients. I don't have any bluetooth devices, but I would imagine that evolution has many uses for bluetooth since it has features to sync with pdas and smartphones. -- libbluetooth3 removal would remove evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)
@shanen: Can you reproduce this after uninstalling ureadahead. I have noticed that when ureadahead does a trace (does it every 30 days or after an update) it can cause some xserver issues including segfaults. See Bug 501715 for more details. -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319146] Re: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.
I am affected by this. I have installed Ubuntu on many computers for people that just wanted a basic computer. Ubuntu was perfect for them, and I rarely get any calls for help. Many of these users would want me to handle any major upgrades. I shouldn't have to keep records of who has what version. The user should have an early warning about end of life. Technically this could be considered a security issue since the user is not made aware that they are vulnerable to exploits. The current notification that a new distribution is available does not inform the user that they must upgrade. Some users do not want to perform the upgrade themselves. An early warning can let them notify the person that will handle the upgrade for them in advance. I would suggest giving the user 3 months notice: "Support for this version of Ubuntu will expire in _ months. Please take measures to upgrade soon." The implementation of this shouldn't require internet access since EOL is determined prior to the release, and some users don't have an always on connection. This check can also be independent of the update-manager in case the automatic update checks are disabled. Security should be pro-active. Informing users on how to perform upgrades after EOL is retro-active. I don't understand why anyone would argue against this. I am sure implementing this would be a simple task, and would not interfere with users that keep up with their upgrades. -- When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
I noticed that the first lines of dumping the pack file show the size of the pack which is pretty close to the size of the missing memory: Fri Jan 22 10:22:38 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 444560 577208 0 22568 106268 -/+ buffers/cache: 315724 706044 Swap: 329292 0 329292 - Fri Jan 22 10:58:27 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 344036 677732 0 37752 119860 -/+ buffers/cache: 186424 835344 Swap: 329292 0 329292 /var/lib/ureadahead/pack: created Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:23:23 + for hdd 8:1 16 inode groups, 1819 files, 1793 blocks (114844 kB) 315724-186424=129300 I am not getting anymore segfaults in X when I remove the pack file. (this is a lucid test machine so there were many updates since then.) -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
I see the debugfs mount also. Maybe it is related. I think this is also related to many users stability issues. If this doesn't get fixed, I would recommend disabling ureadahead for Lucid. It could be a bug in the kernel too. -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 391479 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391479 @vish, no desktop effects. The problem occurs when dpkg requires a user response such as when a config file was modified by the user and dpkg asks whether to use the packaged version or keep the original. The problem is that the dialog steals focus and a default entry is set. If I am typing in another window and I press the enter key (I think the spacebar also) at the same time the dpkg window steals focus, I commit the change without having a chance to review it, and thus possibly breaking my system. -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 391479 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391479 This bug effected me with metacity. I don't use compiz. -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
Since the used memory doesn't seem to belong to a process, and ureadahead requires the kernel to be patched, it seems that the issue might be in the kernel patch. Is there any information on what the patch is, or where to get the source? -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
