[Bug 1697957] Re: Impress crashes when using smooth fade transition on Gnome based desktop environment
I've tried this on a lenovo thinkpad x230 and the test slides produce a screen-tearing effect (horizontal, jagged, flickering bar of transparency) rather than a smooth transition. The errors reported were: javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! Warning: failed to read path from javaldx (soffice:5658): Gtk-WARNING **: Allocating size to OOoFixed 0x563ed1b02270 without calling gtk_widget_get_preferred_width/height(). How does the code know the size to allocate? [the last repeatedly] This is on a live session of ubuntu 17.04 with no updates or alterations. This machine has Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697957 Title: Impress crashes when using smooth fade transition on Gnome based desktop environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1697957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588037] Re: 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly
The user who reported this did not understand at the time of the bug report that 'space' and 'enter' have different behavior in 'more'. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588037 Title: 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/588037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054808] Re: Default filename for screenshots is problematic
Lots of people are impacked by this: http://askubuntu.com/questions/55204/how-can-i-change-the-default-name-for-the-screenshots-made-by-gnome-screenshot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054808 Title: Default filename for screenshots is problematic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1054808/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1050261] Re: Can't change filename pattern of gnome-screenshot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054808 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054808 Also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1054808 Maybe this is a duplicate of the above bug? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1054808 Default filename for screenshots is problematic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050261 Title: Can't change filename pattern of gnome-screenshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/1050261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1050261] Re: Can't change filename pattern of gnome-screenshot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054808 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054808 Several people have this problem: see: http://askubuntu.com/questions/55204/how-can-i-change-the-default-name-for-the-screenshots-made-by-gnome-screenshot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050261 Title: Can't change filename pattern of gnome-screenshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/1050261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: Ubiquity should have a command line option to override the free space check
I went to install 12.04 on my 4gb netbook. First I had to edit /usr/lib/ubiquity/plugins/misc.py to override the space check, next I ran out of space. Do you know why I ran out of space? because 12.04 automatically partitioned 2GB of swap (i had 2GB of ram). Next attempt I manually partitioned 500MB of swap, and then I was able to install. Still, I was surprised that 12.04 has regressed in that: 1) the bug I reported here 1 year ago to overide the space check was not addressed, and 2) It was not netbook aware in its automatic partitioning. Previous versions of ubuntu installed on a netbook would automatically do 500MB for swap. I guess Ubuntu is linux for "new hardware" (not linux for human beings). As I sidenote, the netbook I bought from dell had ubuntu 9.04 pre-installed on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: Ubiquity should have a command line option to override the free space check To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/775124/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948156] Re: Include PHP 5.4 to Ubuntu 12.04 release
Stefan Esser's response about suhosin for php 5.4 https://twitter.com/#!/i0n1c/status/180216025357361153 What they should do is offer both kinds of packages concurrently: php5.4 and php5.3 (this is kind of like they did with wine1.0 and wine1.2 supported) eg: sudo apt-get install php5.4 php5.4-cli php5.4-xdebug or sudo apt-get install php5.3 php5.3-cli php5.3-xdebug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156 Title: Include PHP 5.4 to Ubuntu 12.04 release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/948156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 816033] Re: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OK, I see the problem is that I need a new kernel! Thanks for your help. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJORtWhAAoJEGhkzcI2MgwrC7YP/iPfYx0trx59Wu7uBbm6SWTp teuLPx8IGWlE+EYcC3o0ZHe/t/OMZ/FYd+vPolPdBNmouD4lTFNPSkpR4B1V5it0 Uk0GxiCJwKpuw6z0SMvBD6jqCSfhF6m+S9rdx6XOArRLoWOqOE7QEGF7chKulBRX G4J5cOIYfspcoLgRP84100x2zf4ghSNgQJ8iL3TeEvhGcKGN4GCrlrJC6Z0qMMhS 9HJ7ROAWSQI98oMMGYGu8JrdQSjio5ZNOQGt+fDvDxamnHojs+QppCFevvsgpHuQ 2BbatTKFg2Uoe5QFHgfGEfoYskiSFfTf49zmbhvs2cTxui9oCJ7DobgBWuID3SUp TFeOUxk2HiD0MGqp9IS0DQWkh7kV2jyyn0Egzi+zel4sjz/MyEt+Xl8Ut2F4VKX0 tEF98DkLgA+mZaX9r8ot90eq5BxDwM93fduoy9RD46yEMyrT4gtIgOHAjqI7Ye6s 57pIWa4U3V7vZeKwRmpjaj1dhTSf6avd+MYDktNwdpabZo2oW5+lQTnRq2ULc1gL ECXPr+30kPXAvDb5lhArylo7if8NC5DakVDPTL1CBEx293Nu8hsKrHBYtE3IsIW3 UsK+VEhtZLzwDGz9jfwO5pYOu0mfoiCbC5FBWV08l4J63WGv9INDS4BIUjOModC4 AqgKUefI64wa10IgjV2y =i+mW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816033 Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp- smapi kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/816033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 816033] Re: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Evgeni, On 10/08/11 12:35, Evgeni Golov wrote: > I can't find a 2.6.33-29-realtime for Lucid. Could you point me to it? I > can only find .31 for Lucid... I think this came from a PPA, from which it has subsequently been removed - either abogani's or kxstudio. There is an archived copy at https://launchpad.net/~kxstudio-team/+archive/kernel/+sourcepub/1553321/+listing-archive-extra Cheers, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOROfQAAoJEGhkzcI2MgwrWh8P/AxOPNYQinNZqBhpcmPnZrtA oBrUWhXJkveMpysBI66GjbLba/w092yi9fyyLLKBnnQu5Z+p4EPMcbjrsROqzNvw furKo9u5VX1+DY7n9BgbuYrLJgXjRx1MgWMTI1764YH1Gj9yK5FYCx3dq01r68NN SVnXMihID87WMBeNLmlMO5KW87+0R4tvkLEYDSYhZlpHd5+qBZF+DzWDNO942GOQ HscQOvMqPgre1wGSUaThXNuZ0QhgthvS0EhGv2yJYCmuJ9JdW4cooq68AOI0wP1G oI3OELQQChA+s2kfJ49qohehROgXL81o+jZV6UX1v5I76TdNIX5xh/bHmjhWedVa Ahe5D5zz/W+IgCGkTt3tVqEmj/EwxeqPLMxjZ+RRN+yvI6voWCHlg5iHITPr/ZgC rGfat8UKTWyQIU/WSOW2SK510Fni6W6MGK0peS9XA7ZHeVtI++9/+QDqbkdfUi/P fjx0kd5LToWineBC6MFpJd3iTwB4BclxSc9kExJtQdyTpSaUFzIz5RQfdIVnp3Ou fVrVGo18L17bKFQ1XcaoRAO28/vOh3sTlX057utRVaEIxxG3tNc5mgZSRd4WMBpl 02sk92tp/uOY7WLfAl8Jha93F++xWIb3qv1wgBGKf3errUt9grpqPG/RixFeZprh OfJO2Xuub/XNb6/bc8hM =u4cp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816033 Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp- smapi kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/816033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816033] Re: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build
Thanks Dominik, I'm using the latest realtime kernel from the lucid repositories - I haven't patched (or compiled) it myself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816033 Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp- smapi kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/816033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816033] Re: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816033 Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp- smapi kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/816033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816033] [NEW] package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: I also tried to use module-assistant to prepare the module from source - that also failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) Uname: Linux 2.6.33-29-realtime i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jul 25 18:36:07 2011 ErrorMessage: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20110211.3) PackageVersion: 0.40-7 SourcePackage: tp-smapi Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp-smapi kernel module failed to build ** Affects: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816033 Title: package tp-smapi-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tp- smapi kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/816033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812543] [NEW] textadept
Public bug reported: In windows I use Notepad2 as my single windowed text editor. It is a very popular project, it opens really fast and supports scintilla syntax highlighting, full utf8 support, block select (scintilla based). I finally found an equivalent for linux without having to use wine: http://code.google.com/p/textadept/ Could we get textadept packaged for the ubuntu? The project currently allows the user to download i386 and x86_64 binaries for linux. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812543 Title: textadept To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/812543/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717717] Re: V4L support can't be enabled on 2.6.38+
After updating I now see the audio input options rather than the Error message stating that V4L is missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717717 Title: V4L support can't be enabled on 2.6.38+ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771641] Re: Active tab is difficult to distinguish in gnome-terminal
workaround: http://askubuntu.com/questions/40332/how-to-make-selected-tab-in-terminal-more-prominent -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771641 Title: Active tab is difficult to distinguish in gnome-terminal -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
Actually that idea was thanks to Nathan, see (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164). I don't mean to take credit for it. Arturo, excellent idea. I just installed it in a VM, so I could see the peak disk space used based on the size of my .vdi file. On the disk, the base install of ubuntu-11.04-desktop-i386.iso only takes up 2.2GB, but the .vdi file is 2.6GB (2708508672 bytes), so that was its peak for a base install, no extra packages. I just think its awful for the UI to enforce an arbitrary (and artificially high) limit. The UI says "for best results, have 4.4GB, a connection to the internet, and be plugged into power" (see attached screenshot above), when actually you are completely hindered from proceeding. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
Here is the wonder boy who caused this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/745148/comments/10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
more people bugged by this bug: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1736109 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
more people bugged by this bug: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1737684 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772164] Re: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 775124 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 I created a new bug under the correct package - ubiquity because i could not figure out how to move this bug to the correct package. I marked this as a duplicate. All future discussion should happen under bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/775124 Thanks for the workaround Nathan, i will try that, but hopefully this bug will be fixed in ubiquity. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 775124 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD * You can subscribe to bug 775124 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/775124/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 Title: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
Catchup from bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 "same behavior on an EeePc 4G; the forward button is greyed out." "please file bug against the ubiquity package" "I've got a work around... Run the live CD, press alt+f2 and type: gksu gedit /usr/lib/ubiquity/plugins/ubi-prepare.py Then on line 310, change "min_disk_size = size * 2" to "min_disk_size = size * 1.4" Then run then Ubuntu installer." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] Re: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Install.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124/+attachment/2104169/+files/Screenshot-Install.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775124] [NEW] 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I downloaded the 11.04 desktop i386 iso, put it on a usb drive so i could it install it on my netbook, but couldnt even get past the install screen, because it says i need 4.4GB to install ubuntu 11.04. The problem is that my hard drive is only 4GB large, a common size in netbooks. I have run installers for ubuntu 10.10, 10.04, 9.10 and 9.04 netbook editions on my netbook and never had a problem before. I notice that 11.04 has netbook and desktop editions combined into a single ISO, so maybe that is why the error happened in 11.04 and not before. Also, I notice that the install footprint of 10.10 is around 2.1GB, so it shouldnt be a problem running 11.04 unless they truly added 2GB of junk to the OS. The problem is I just can't get past the installer. [i am intentionally posting a duplicate of bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 because i can't change the package of bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 to ubiquity from netbook] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ubiquity 2.6.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 1 20:24:28 2011 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775124 Title: 11.04 requires 4.4GB to install on netbook with 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772164] Re: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD
I think this is a problem with the installer. I'm not sure how to assign this bug to the installer. Anyone know? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 Title: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772164] Re: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Install.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164/+attachment/2092460/+files/Screenshot-Install.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 Title: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772164] [NEW] 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD
Public bug reported: I downloaded the 11.04 desktop i386 iso, put it on a usb drive so i could it install it on my netbook, but couldnt even get past the install screen, because it says i need 4.4GB to install ubuntu 11.04. The problem is that my hard drive is only 4GB large, a common size in netbooks. I have run installers for ubuntu 10.10, 10.04, 9.10 and 9.04 netbook editions on my netbook and never had a problem before. I notice that 11.04 has netbook and desktop editions combined into a single ISO, so maybe that is why the error happened in 11.04 and not before. Also, I notice that the install footprint of 10.10 is around 2.1GB, so it shouldnt be a problem running 11.04 unless they truly added 2GB of junk to the OS. The problem is I just can't get past the installer. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ubuntu-netbook (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 28 05:43:29 2011 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: netbook-meta UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: netbook-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772164 Title: 11.04 reqs 4.4GB to install, dell mini 9 has 4GB SSD -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] Re: pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
Pasting into google chrome doesn't insert CRLFs like firefox does, so is the fix to use chrome? :) -- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] Re: pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
Screenshot of the json_encode of the text after the post. Notice it has \r\n\r\n instead of just \r\n ** Attachment added: "screenshot2.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/670018/+attachment/1720820/+files/screenshot2.png -- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] Re: pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
Screenshot of tamperdata plugin, note %0D is \r (CR) and %0A is \n (LF). ** Attachment added: "screenshot1.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/670018/+attachment/1720819/+files/screenshot1.png -- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] Re: pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
Screenshot of newlines in geany. ** Attachment added: "screenshot0.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/670018/+attachment/1720818/+files/screenshot0.png -- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] Re: pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
-- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670018] [NEW] pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox I downloaded a text file with CRLF line endings. Pasted it from gedit/geany (the result is the same) into a firefox textarea (in my case the textarea was at http://pinyintools.zedwood.com/tojavascript ). When you push submit you can see the lines are delimited with \r\n\r\n (crlfcrlf instead of crlf). To confirm it wasn't the server that was doing anything funny I used the firefox tamperdata plug-in and captured the outgoing HTTP POST and looked at it, and it definitely had crlfcrlf. I'll upload a screenshot of that too in a sec. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.11+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 2 10:24:16 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.11+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.11+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-branding 3.6.11+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- pasting from crlf file into firefox textarea results in crlfcrlf line endings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652331] Re: terminal window super hard to resize
I think the problem didn't bother me as much in 10.04 because the terminal had a rounded bottom which extended the target click area. I propose an increased target area. For instance: [see attached] there is a bunch of dots arranged in a triangle to hint the user that it is resizable. If we could make the scrollbar end 10-20 pixels north of the bottom right of the window to allow room for a triangle dot icon, it would increase the target click area, and would help a lot for usability. A lot of windows have a status bar at the bottom and the triangle area is actually a part of the status bar, like in gedit and firefox. I know gnome-terminal doesn't have a status bar, but it does help for resize usability in the other programs. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot1.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/652331/+attachment/1659163/+files/Screenshot1.png -- terminal window super hard to resize https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652331] Re: terminal window super hard to resize
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652331/+attachment/1658911/+files/Dependencies.txt -- terminal window super hard to resize https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652331] [NEW] terminal window super hard to resize
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal If I need to resize it I usually do so at the bottom right of the window. In Ubuntu 10.10 when I am using the terminal, I have to spend 10 seconds hovering over different pixels at the bottom right corner of the terminal window looking for the sweet spot (for the icon to change to the 'resize triangle'). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gnome-terminal 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Sep 30 12:55:34 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release Candidate i386 (20100928) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-terminal ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- terminal window super hard to resize https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595867] Re: [lucid-updates regression] escaping of contact names is broken
Wait, i mean... when will 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu4 get pushed to lucid-updates? Right now the latest is 2.28.3-0ubuntu10. -- [lucid-updates regression] escaping of contact names is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595867] Re: [lucid-updates regression] escaping of contact names is broken
If this bug was fixed in the package evolution-data-server (2.30.2-0ubuntu2) maverick, why can't I see it in lucid? -- [lucid-updates regression] escaping of contact names is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] Re: evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 595867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595867 This is a duplicate of the other bug. The other bug was fixed: Latest release: 2.30.2-0ubuntu3, uploaded to main on 2010-06-28 10:30:11.675260+00:00 by Didier Roche (didrocks), maintained by Ubuntu Development Team (ubuntu-dev) So once this is pushed to the lucid-updates I will be happy. Until then its broken as far as I am concerned. -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] Re: evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 595867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595867 I agree this does seem to be a duplicate of bug #595867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 595867 [lucid-updates regression] escaping of contact names is broken -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] Re: evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 595867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595867 That package is listed in the dependencies.txt file included above: evolution-data-server 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu4 -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] Re: evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
um, obviously between steps 2 and 3 of the test case... remember to add a garbage subject and gargbage message body. -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] Re: evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51042451/Dependencies.txt -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599473] [NEW] evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Reproducible test case (email and name anonymized): 1. Create a new message: 2. Type everything into the 'to:' field between square brackets: [J. Paul Turner ] 3. Click Send 4. Look in your sent folder (or outbox) 5. The To: field was been reformatted to J.PaulT I tried this with multiple valid emails, and it worked every time with the version of evolution I have installed. This error also happened when selecting the "to:" from my address book. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jun 28 11:35:29 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- evolution won't send to sender with . in full name field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588037] Re: 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49458035/Dependencies.txt -- 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588037 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588037] [NEW] 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: util-linux using cedict.u8 extracted from: http://www.mdbg.net/chindict/export/cedict/cedict_1_0_ts_utf-8_mdbg.zip If you run on the command line: cat cedict.u8 |more It displays 1 screen of data from the file, but every time you push 'enter' after that, instead of displaying 1 additional screen of data at a time, it displays 1 additional line at a time. This is reproducible every time the file contains multibyte utf8 characters like 你好. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: util-linux 2.17.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Mon May 31 14:11:06 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: util-linux ** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- 'more' doesnt handle multibyte utf8 properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588037 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531654] Re: Make shutdown and user menu separate applets
I take back what i said about switchuser... I just found the gconf-editor key: /desktop/gnome/lockdown/disable_user_switching very useful. -- Make shutdown and user menu separate applets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531654] Re: Make shutdown and user menu separate applets
gconf-editor currently (as of 10.04) has the following options: /apps/indicator-session/suppress_logout_menuitem (bool) /apps/indicator-session/suppress_logout_restart_menuitem (bool) /apps/indicator-session/suppress_restart_menuitem (bool) /apps/indicator-session/suppress_shutdown_menuitem (bool) The least we can do is add /apps/indicator-session/suppress_memenu_menuitem (bool) /apps/indicator-session/suppress_switchuser_menuitem (bool) -- Make shutdown and user menu separate applets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559415] [NEW] 10.04 beta2 won't boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub The live CD for ubuntu 10.04 beta2 won't boot for me. But if I set a kernel parameter to acpi=off, then the live CD works fine for me (this is not the bug I am reporting, please read the whole thing). Then after I install from the live CD, and it goes to boot for the first time, grub no longer has a 10 second timeout so I can't add acpi=off again. I have to reboot with the live CD as a rescue CD, edit /boot/grub/grub.cfg, add "set timeout=10" at the bottom of it. Then I reboot with the newly installed 10.04 beta2, and during the 10 second timeout, add acpi=off to the boot parameter, and then I can get into 10.04 beta2 just fine. I had this problem in 10.04 beta1 as well. The problem is that 10.04 beta2 won't boot for me on the first boot after installing (because I need to add acpi=off again). If I have added acpi=off in order to get the installer/live cd to come up, there is a 99% I will need it to get the freshly installed system to come up too. Here are some potential solutions: 1. If any extra kernel boot parameters are added during the boot of the installer/live cd, then those kernel boot parameters should be automatically added to the default grub entry of the freshly installed system. 2. If any extra kernel boot parameters are added during the boot of the installer/live cd, then the default grub timeout should be 10 and not 0 on the freshly installed system. 3. Always make the default grub timeout 10. I like option 1 the most and option 3 the least, because that would conflict with fast boot times which is a goal in 10.04. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: grub (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 9 10:48:23 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100406.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub ** Affects: grub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- 10.04 beta2 won't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76449] Re: Cannot sort static playlists
This bug is really irritating, especially for large playlists. -- Cannot sort static playlists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429569] Re: "Evolution Mail" shouldn't appear in indicator-applet when the user has selected a different email application in System>Preferences>Preferred Applications
No offense, but marking this as won't fix doesn't address the larger usability issue. The issue that your users expect an application to work a certain way because of the way you presented the interface to them, and it doesn't work that way. There is no point in choosing a Preferred Application, if things like indicator-applet don't respect that decision. If I click on indicator- applet and select 'compose new message' it should ABSOLUTELY launch my default mail client that I chose in the gnome-preferred-applications- properties window. The indicator-applet is application agnostic. If not, don't you think the package should be renamed evolution-indicator- applet? -- "Evolution Mail" shouldn't appear in indicator-applet when the user has selected a different email application in System>Preferences>Preferred Applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 500321] Re: Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised"
Hi Bashar On 12/01/10 12:05, Bashar wrote: > what do i need todo ? The error dialogue is telling you that some of the libraries upon which thunderbird depends are out of date, so it would make no sense to report your problem as a bug until you rectify that. This suggests an underlying problem, i.e. that your system is not fully updated. You need to open a terminal and "sudo apt-get update" then "sudo apt-get upgrade". You will probably notice that libc6 and libc-bin are amongst the packages that are listed to be updated. When you've done this, try to reproduce your problem again. It may have gone away. If not, try using apport again. HTH, Mark -- Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504269] Re: Amarok corrupts library when data files are temporarily unavailable
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37544620/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37544621/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37544622/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37544623/XsessionErrors.txt -- Amarok corrupts library when data files are temporarily unavailable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504269] [NEW] Amarok corrupts library when data files are temporarily unavailable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok My configuration, while not the most common, cannot be too rare. Most of my music files are located on a remote media server, and are NFS mounted to my workstation. If my workstation (and Amorak) are started while the remote box is down, I am unable to access any music files using Amorak. This issue persists even after booting the remote server and remounting the filesystem. At this point, rescanning the collection has no visible action in Amorak. No scanning progress bar appears, and music remains unavailable. This can manifest itself in one of two ways. Sometimes, I am able to at least view the Artist/Album heirarchy, but not any files within them. If this occurs, it persists until a restart of the application, where it switches to the other behavior. That being, no Artist/Album (or file) information is shown at all. Rescanning collection still has no effect on the UI or the storage. furthermore, the only way to correct this issue is to remove ~/.kde/share/apps/amarok and rescan everything from scratch. This of course also blows away all information about album covers, etc. This issue is not specific to 2.2.0, I'm just now fed up enough to make a formal bug report for this issue. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jan 7 09:31:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/amarok NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: amarok 2:2.2.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: amarok Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Amarok corrupts library when data files are temporarily unavailable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500369] Re: thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500321] Re: Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised"
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37182179/Dependencies.txt -- Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500321] [NEW] Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised"
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird In Ubuntustudio 9.10 using thunderbird 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly- 0ubuntu1, attempting to launch thunderbird fails like this: $ thunderbird (thunderbird-bin:11442): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times Segmentation fault $ Using the -safe-mode to disable plugins makes no difference. I tried the debugging procedure from the wiki, and when I start gdb it says, ""/usr/bin/thunderbird": not in executable format: File format not recognised" Thinking that perhaps the executable had been corrupted, I did an "apt- get remove --purge thunderbird" then "apt-get install thunderbird" and tried again... $ thunderbird -safe-mode (thunderbird-bin:12124): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times Segmentation fault $ This time, I can see the thunderbird window open momentarily before it fails, unlike before, but gdb still won't recognise the file format. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: 2d4603cace6b01ff68a26b179ae013b9 CheckboxSystem: bb422ca46d02494cdbc459927a98bc2f Date: Fri Dec 25 11:06:18 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: thunderbird 2.0.0.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.152-rt SourcePackage: thunderbird Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-rt i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:3692): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:3788): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:3764): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (gnome-panel:3746): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Thunderbird segfaults, gdb says "file format not recognised" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476092] Re: nautilus edit'preferences dialog too big for 1024x576 UNR display
Very irritating bug that affects me too. Its really irritating because the OK/Cancel options are outside the viewable area. -- nautilus edit'preferences dialog too big for 1024x576 UNR display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257145] Re: Trying to load some sf2 soundfonts with sfxload or asfxload causes immediate system crash.
I can confirm this bug. Attempting to load either of the two soundfonts supplied by Phil The Dill using asfxload on my SoundBlaster Live! causes an immediate hard system lockup. I am able to load smaller and larger soundfonts and use them successfully. ** Changed in: awesfx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Trying to load some sf2 soundfonts with sfxload or asfxload causes immediate system crash. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383999] Re: no JACK support
This problem exists in both 32-bit and 64-bit archs. ** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no JACK support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 468087] Re: dell precision t3400 resume after suspend not working ubuntu 9.10
thats on 9.04 ... i'll be installing 9.10 soon. -- dell precision t3400 resume after suspend not working ubuntu 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 468087] Re: dell precision t3400 resume after suspend not working ubuntu 9.10
I also have a dell t3400 workstation. When I come back to the machine after a long time... the screensaver is on... i use a screensaver password when i type it in and push enter... the following things have been known to happen: 1. machine wakes up from screensaver nicely 2. semi-freezes ctrl alt f1... then ctrl alt f7 wakes it up. 3. totally freezes -- dell precision t3400 resume after suspend not working ubuntu 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478547] Re: ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520
Well this is officially your bug. I was appeared to have a similar bug thats all. I solved mine! I used xforcevesa as a boot option on the 'try ubuntu without changing anything' option worked and loaded into a live session. source: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BootOptions#Common%20Boot%20Options Look at the boot options... try some... maybe eventually you'll get it working. xforcevesa: "Force X to start using VESA driver. Useful for some notebooks with uncommon video interfaces." So i guess my video card, PCI Express 16X nvidia 256 MB Quadro NVS 290 (DVI output only) has an uncommon video interface. -- ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478547] Re: ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520
Looks like the dark brown ubuntu spotlight is called xplash. So this bug could be retitled 'karmic live cd freezes during xsplash'. -- ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478547] Re: ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520
The freeze happens on the karmic 9.10 amd64 and i386 install CDs... both when you go to install... and when you go into 'try ubuntu without changes'. Boot sequence: 1] Bios 2] Grub 3] glowing ubuntu logo 4] hourglass for a splitsecond 5] dark brown ubuntu spotlight FREEZE. If you remove splash and quiet from you kernel options on boot, it only gives you a debugging info in place of the glowing ubuntu logo, and not in place of the dark brown ubuntu spotlight where it freezes. What i am looking for is debugging info during the dark brown ubuntu spotlight load process. Video card: PCI Express 16X nvidia 256 MB Quadro NVS 290 -- ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
Hi Eric Eric Hedekar (stochastic) wrote: > ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2894009 >http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2894009 Thanks for pointing that out. I've added a 'me too' comment on sourceforge and a link to the launchpad bug from there. Mark -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478547] Re: ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520
The CPU of the dellT3400 workstation is an Intel Core 2 Duo E4500... there is no onboard VGA on the motherboard, only a PCI (or PCIe? I'll have to look) video card. I tried doing the install with all the F6 kernel options specified: acpi=off noapic nolapic edd=on nodmraid and it still froze at the same point. I just realized there is a kind of a debugging mode on the install cd. When you select 'install ubuntu' a list of kernel boot options shows up near the bottom of the screen. If you backspace the words 'splash' and the 'quiet' then your install process dumps lots of debugging information during the whole process of loading up. I will try this later and report my findings. -- ubuntu 9.10 won't install on dell dimension e520 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3582/Dependencies.txt -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479662] [NEW] muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: muse I tried to launch MusE from the menu but that failed, so I tried on the command line and got this: $ muse muse: malloc.c:3074: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long)old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed. Aborted A quick search showed that a similar problem has been found in Arch linux: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15466?project=1&order=dateopened&sort=desc&pagenum=8 I tried downloading the source from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=93414 and compiled the latest stable version of MusE (1.0RC3), and the resulting executable gave me exactly the same error as above. All this was quite a surprise, as MusE is the midi sequencer installed by default in ubuntustudio and I expected it to just work. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 9 23:31:29 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: muse 0.8.1a-6.3 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.152-rt SourcePackage: muse Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-rt x86_64 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:2923): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:2923): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2964): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:2956): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (gnome-panel:2955): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window ** Affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: muse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
