[Bug 747682] Re: unity panel drop shadow should be disabled when panel transparency is set to 0.0000

2011-04-02 Thread Mike D
Definite ditto here! I'm sure it looks luvverley with a visible panel. Sadly, 
not so with a transparent panel. Quite hideous actually :-)
Please give us the option to delete it :-)  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747682

Title:
  unity panel drop shadow should be disabled when panel transparency is
  set to 0.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692391] Re: no timestamp timeout in latest sudo except for current instance

2011-02-28 Thread Mike D
Thank you Doug. That's fixed it :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692391

Title:
  no timestamp timeout in latest sudo except for current instance

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692391] Re: no timestamp timeout in latest sudo except for current instance

2011-01-25 Thread Mike D
The silence is deafening in here  :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692391

Title:
  no timestamp timeout in latest sudo except for current instance

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 704032] Re: Please update cairo-dock-plug-ins and cairo-dock metapackage to depend on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0

2011-01-21 Thread Mike D
Only 2 me too's? Really?
I miss my cairo dock. It's my only way back in to Unity if it crashes. No 
ctrl+Alt+T, no Alt+F2, I'm suffering here :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704032

Title:
  Please update cairo-dock-plug-ins and cairo-dock metapackage to depend
  on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 704032] Re: Please update cairo-dock-plug-ins and cairo-dock metapackage to depend on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0

2011-01-21 Thread Mike D
Matthieu baerts, thank you for your comments and instructions. My cairo dock is 
now working perfectly :-) 
Oh Happy Day! 
Thanks for the speedy response!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704032

Title:
  Please update cairo-dock-plug-ins and cairo-dock metapackage to depend
  on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option results in OS and data loss

2011-01-20 Thread Mike D
Some welcome changes indeed, thanks to all involved.

It's hard to tell someone that their system is wrecked when they think
they chose the safe option.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option results in OS and
  data loss

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703921] [NEW] package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

2011-01-17 Thread Mike D
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: dpkg

LTS upgrade from DELL I530 from Ubuntu HH 8.04 LTS to newest Ubuntu 10.04 LL 
LTS.
10.04 LL LTS release
Upgrade errors relating to Open Office

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-24.61-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jan 17 05:50:20 2011
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: package openoffice.org-voikko is already installed and configured
SourcePackage: dpkg
Title: package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703921

Title:
  package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703921] Re: package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

2011-01-17 Thread Mike D


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703921

Title:
  package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2011-01-09 Thread Mike D
Just another victim
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1662989page=2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2011-01-02 Thread Mike D
and another one
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1658234

Relevant passage
And your warnings about the 'install alongside' option came too late - I had 
of course already tried the installation when I posted my problem. So I now 
discover that the Ubuntu installation has wiped Windows from my brand new 
laptop.

Having an 'install alongside' option which does nothing of the sort but
wipes the 'alongside' OS partition instead is one hell of a bug!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-12-27 Thread Mike D
Another one
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1653606

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-12-24 Thread Mike D
Post #6 here seems to sum up people's feelings about this
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1652092

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-12-24 Thread Mike D
Happy Christmas :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-12-19 Thread Mike D
Another victim
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1649215

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-12-17 Thread Mike D
Certainly prospective new users who have spent a couple of days trying to get 
their Windows system back to where it was before they tried installing 10.10 
won't be filing bug reports. They probably feel more like filing a law suit :-)
Won't fix - now there's a statement! 
Won't listen may be more appropriate!

It's not rocket science guys. Once somebody has chosen install alongside, the 
options Use Entire Disc or Use Entire Partition are redundant and can only 
serve to confuse people who may be new to installing anything.
But that's not the worst of it!
Choosing to install alongside and then being able to trash the system you 
intend to install alongside  is just potty!  

I really don't understand the retiscence in regard to seeing the difficulties 
here, nevermind doing something about it.
People have posted here and in the forums, as Erick Brunzell has stated, about 
losing their existing system because they made a mistake when using the 10.10 
installer. I don't agree that they made a mistake. I think the installer is 
wrong.
I don't think the ability to make that mistake should exist at all. 

This is not a problem - this is a showstopper for prospective Linux users. 
A disaster waiting to happen.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950

Title:
  Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 685352] Re: plymouth2_0.8.2-2ubuntu6 and later give ragged splash and text rendering

2010-12-05 Thread Mike D
Me too. Even with 1920x1200 graphics configured for Plymouth it still
looks a little rough around the edges. Using nvidia-current.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685352

Title:
  plymouth2_0.8.2-2ubuntu6 and later give ragged splash and text rendering

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 684599] Re: Memory leak in nm-applet

2010-12-04 Thread Mike D
currently using 203MB on my system after 6 hours uptime

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684599

Title:
  Memory leak in nm-applet

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-11-22 Thread Mike D
I agree entirely. The 10.04 (and previous) installer had to be changed
because it wouldn't recognise some modern partition types, but apart
from that, there was nothing wrong with its layout. This new one is
ridiculous in my view and should be put in the bin. 
It is going to make sure that people stay away from Linux instead of
embrace it!
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 15:39 +, Jehiva wrote:
 This screwed me over, I really wish I would have looked it up prior to
 using the option.
 
 I had three partitions all set and ready to go. One was my existing NTFS
 partition with Windows 7 on it.
 
 Another was my Ubuntu 10.10 32 bit partition.
 
 Lastly I had a third partition formatted as ext4, I had that partition
 selected and chose to Use Entire Partition.
 
 The damn installer took the entire hard drive for the new Ubuntu 10.10
 64 bit install.
 
 Claiming that what I wanted to do was split partitions or something is
 ridiculous, I had 3 distinct partitions - each formatted completely
 different (NTFS, ext3, ext4) and the thing used the entire disk.
 
 If I had wanted to use the entire disk, I would have chose that option.
 
 VERY misleading and aggravating. The 10.04 installer worked perfect to
 allow me to dual boot Windows 7 and Ubuntu 10.04 while the 10.10
 installer just screwed me over and erased all my data.


-- 
Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option

2010-11-15 Thread Mike D
I think the failings here are obvious. It really shouldn't need explaining imo. 
Is it the intention to frighten prospective users away entirely (after wiping 
their Windows installation, that is)? If so, good job. 
If confirmation is required, have a look in the forums or take note of the (no 
doubt) increase in the number of times testdisk has been downloaded.
As a somewhat experienced installer, I always select the manual partitioning 
option as experience has taught me not to trust any installer. Less experienced 
users will have no trouble whatsoever hosing any existing installation with 
this installer. Maybe it should be renamed Ubiquity os-hoser.

-- 
Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 411788] Re: Mouse feedback off by quite a bit

2009-11-16 Thread mike d
For me, the focus is always correct, but the icons do not respond to
clicks, about 50% of the time.  They will even flash as though
responding to the click, but not fire the app.  (karmic, acer aspire
1410)

-- 
Mouse feedback off by quite a bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411788
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 406466] Re: 2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories

2009-11-08 Thread mike d
Neither noserverino nor permissions fix worked for me.  I still can't list the 
files on my Time Capsule, although I can navigate using directory names I 
remember.  I've tried both lines below with no luck - am I messing up this 
work-around?
//10.0.1.1/Time\040Capsule /mnt/mmslab  cifs  
noserverino,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,username=myuserID,password=mypassword  
0  0

//10.0.1.1/Time\040Capsule /mnt/mmslab smbfs
noserverino,rw,user=myuserID,pass=mypassword,dirmode=0777,filemode=0777
0 0

-- 
2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 406466] Re: 2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories

2009-11-08 Thread mike d
nounix did the trick!  And I finally have full file permissions again
too!  Thanks!

-- 
2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 406466] Re: 2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories

2009-11-08 Thread mike d
Neither noserverino nor permissions fix worked for me.  I still can't list the 
files on my Time Capsule, although I can navigate using directory names I 
remember.  I've tried both lines below with no luck - am I messing up this 
work-around?
//10.0.1.1/Time\040Capsule /mnt/mmslab  cifs  
noserverino,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,username=myuserID,password=mypassword  
0  0

//10.0.1.1/Time\040Capsule /mnt/mmslab smbfs
noserverino,rw,user=myuserID,pass=mypassword,dirmode=0777,filemode=0777
0 0

-- 
2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 406466] Re: 2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories

2009-11-08 Thread mike d
nounix did the trick!  And I finally have full file permissions again
too!  Thanks!

-- 
2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs