[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-31 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
Sorted out the issue. I've got systemd to also wait for ufw to load when
starting fail2ban.

Fail2ban issues a many iptables commands in rapid succession and then
it's database of banned IPs is large it takes a considerable amount of
time for the firewall to be initialised.  In the meanwhile anything
issuing iptables commands quite likely fail as is it not possible to
have more than one instance of iptables active at any one time.

ufw script completes its tasks quickly so makes sense to force that
service to start before the fail2ban service.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956029

Title:
  ufw remains inactive at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
Right after reboot I tried to get the status.

Result is . . . .

root@loki:~# s ufw status
ERROR: problem running iptables: Another app is currently holding the xtables 
lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?

. . . . while fail2ban is setting up its rules.

Anyway...  After a reeboot, whatever I've done seems to have worked.
I'm assuming adding "ufw.service" to fail2ban.service may have done the
trick as has been mentioned on comment 4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956029

Title:
  ufw remains inactive at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
By networking stops means that I can not establish a connection with the
Lemaker BananaPi Pro on any port so I can't get a SSHed shell, can't
access the VPN server, etc...  It behaves like someone has plugged the
network cable.

Putting "ufw.service" was a guess, but I've not rebooted the OS yet with
that in place.

root@loki:~# iptables --version
iptables v1.8.4 (legacy)
root@loki:~# uname -a
Linux loki 5.10.60-sunxi #21.08.2 SMP Tue Sep 14 16:28:44 UTC 2021 armv7l 
armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
root@loki:~# fail2ban-client --version
Fail2Ban v0.11.1

OS in use obtained from here: https://www.armbian.com/banana-pi-pro/

I will try a reboot and see what happens. Will report result back here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956029

Title:
  ufw remains inactive at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
root@loki:/home/myron# journalctl -u ufw.service
-- Logs begin at Wed 2021-12-29 15:30:45 GMT, end at Thu 2021-12-30 13:10:27 
GMT. --
-- No entries --

-

Current status of service. ufw was enabled manually so is actually
active. It won't be once I reboot.

root@loki:/home/myron# systemctl status ufw
● ufw.service - Uncomplicated firewall
 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ufw.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
 Active: active (exited) since Wed 2021-12-29 15:30:34 GMT; 21h ago
   Docs: man:ufw(8)
   Main PID: 295 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
  Tasks: 0 (limit: 4915)
 Memory: 0B
 CGroup: /system.slice/ufw.service

Warning: journal has been rotated since unit was started, output may be
incomplete.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956029

Title:
  ufw remains inactive at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
** Description changed:

- I was advised to start a bug report:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1726856/comments/38
+ I was advised to start a bug report (Comment 38):
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1726856
  
  I "ufw enable" then several seconds later networking stops. I have get
  Ubuntu to gracefully power-down using the power-button and then
  gracefully power-up.
  
  Out of curiosity, is anyone here having this problem wish ufw starting
  up at boot time while also using having fail2ban installed?
  
  Here is my theory. It takes a while for fail2ban to issue all the
  iptable commands to configure the firewall. When ufw tries to initialise
  there may be a clash or lock held either by an iptables instance spawned
  by fail2ban or an iptables instance spawned by ufw. One of them will
  fail and will quite probably mess-up ufw's rules breaking network
  connectivity.
  
  This time I waited for fail2ban to finish establishing its iptables
  rules before issuing "ufw enable" and this time round network
  connectivity was not lost.
  
  How to I ensure that ufw is fully up and initialised BEFORE the fail2ban
  service starts?
  
  -
  root@loki:~# ./ufw-diag.sh
  Has python: pass (binary: python3, version: 3.8.10, py3)
  Has iptables: pass
  Has ip6tables: pass
  
  Has /proc/net/dev: pass
  Has /proc/net/if_inet6: pass
  
  This script will now attempt to create various rules using the iptables
  and ip6tables commands. This may result in module autoloading (eg, for
  IPv6).
  Proceed with checks (Y/n)?
  == IPv4 ==
  Creating 'ufw-check-requirements'... done
  Inserting RETURN at top of 'ufw-check-requirements'... done
  TCP: pass
  UDP: pass
  destination port: pass
  source port: pass
  ACCEPT: pass
  DROP: pass
  REJECT: pass
  LOG: pass
  hashlimit: pass
  limit: pass
  ctstate (NEW): pass
  ctstate (RELATED): pass
  ctstate (ESTABLISHED): pass
  ctstate (INVALID): pass
  ctstate (new, recent set): pass
  ctstate (new, recent update): pass
  ctstate (new, limit): pass
  interface (input): pass
  interface (output): pass
  multiport: pass
  comment: pass
  addrtype (LOCAL): pass
  addrtype (MULTICAST): pass
  addrtype (BROADCAST): pass
  icmp (destination-unreachable): pass
  icmp (source-quench): pass
  icmp (time-exceeded): pass
  icmp (parameter-problem): pass
  icmp (echo-request): pass
  
  == IPv6 ==
  Creating 'ufw-check-requirements6'... done
  Inserting RETURN at top of 'ufw-check-requirements6'... done
  TCP: pass
  UDP: pass
  destination port: pass
  source port: pass
  ACCEPT: pass
  DROP: pass
  REJECT: pass
  LOG: pass
  hashlimit: pass
  limit: pass
  ctstate (NEW): pass
  ctstate (RELATED): pass
  ctstate (ESTABLISHED): pass
  ctstate (INVALID): pass
  ctstate (new, recent set): pass
  ctstate (new, recent update): pass
  ctstate (new, limit): pass
  interface (input): pass
  interface (output): pass
  multiport: pass
  comment: pass
  icmpv6 (destination-unreachable): pass
  icmpv6 (packet-too-big): pass
  icmpv6 (time-exceeded): pass
  icmpv6 (parameter-problem): pass
  icmpv6 (echo-request): pass
  icmpv6 with hl (neighbor-solicitation): pass
  icmpv6 with hl (neighbor-advertisement): pass
  icmpv6 with hl (router-solicitation): pass
  icmpv6 with hl (router-advertisement): pass
  ipv6 rt: pass
  
  All tests passed
  -
  root@loki:/lib/systemd/system# cat ufw.service
  [Unit]
  Description=Uncomplicated firewall
  Documentation=man:ufw(8)
  DefaultDependencies=no
  Before=network.target
  After=NetworkManager.service
  
  [Service]
  Type=oneshot
  RemainAfterExit=yes
  ExecStart=/lib/ufw/ufw-init start quiet
  # ExecStartPost=/bin/sleep 10
  ExecStop=/lib/ufw/ufw-init stop
  
  [Install]
  WantedBy=multi-user.target
  
  -
  root@loki:/lib/systemd/system# cat fail2ban.service
  [Unit]
  Description=Fail2Ban Service
  Documentation=man:fail2ban(1)
  After=network.target iptables.service firewalld.service ip6tables.service 
ipset.service nftables.service ufw.service
  PartOf=firewalld.service
  
  [Service]
  Type=simple
  ExecStartPre=/bin/mkdir -p /run/fail2ban
  ExecStart=/usr/bin/fail2ban-server -xf start
  # if should be logged in systemd journal, use following line or set logtarget 
to sysout in fail2ban.local
  # ExecStart=/usr/bin/fail2ban-server -xf --logtarget=sysout start
  ExecStop=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client stop
  ExecReload=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client reload
  PIDFile=/run/fail2ban/fail2ban.pid
  Restart=on-failure
  RestartPreventExitStatus=0 255
  
  [Install]
  WantedBy=multi-user.target
  
  -
  root@loki:/etc/default# cat ufw
  # /etc/default/ufw
  #
  
  # Set to yes to apply rules to support IPv6 (no means only IPv6 on loopback
  # accepted). You will need to 'disable' and then 'enable' the firewall for
  # the changes to take affect.
  IPV6=yes
  
  # Set the default input policy to ACCEPT, DROP, or REJECT. Please note that if
  # you change this you will most likely want to adjust your rules.
  DEFAULT

[Bug 1726856] Re: ufw does not start automatically at boot

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
@jdstrand I've created a new bug report as you suggested:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726856

Title:
  ufw does not start automatically at boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1726856/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] Re: ufw remains inactive at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
** Summary changed:

- ufw does not activate at boot time
+ ufw remains inactive at boot time

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956029

Title:
  ufw remains inactive at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1956029/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956029] [NEW] ufw does not activate at boot time

2021-12-30 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
Public bug reported:

I was advised to start a bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1726856/comments/38

I "ufw enable" then several seconds later networking stops. I have get
Ubuntu to gracefully power-down using the power-button and then
gracefully power-up.

Out of curiosity, is anyone here having this problem wish ufw starting
up at boot time while also using having fail2ban installed?

Here is my theory. It takes a while for fail2ban to issue all the
iptable commands to configure the firewall. When ufw tries to initialise
there may be a clash or lock held either by an iptables instance spawned
by fail2ban or an iptables instance spawned by ufw. One of them will
fail and will quite probably mess-up ufw's rules breaking network
connectivity.

This time I waited for fail2ban to finish establishing its iptables
rules before issuing "ufw enable" and this time round network
connectivity was not lost.

How to I ensure that ufw is fully up and initialised BEFORE the fail2ban
service starts?

-
root@loki:~# ./ufw-diag.sh
Has python: pass (binary: python3, version: 3.8.10, py3)
Has iptables: pass
Has ip6tables: pass

Has /proc/net/dev: pass
Has /proc/net/if_inet6: pass

This script will now attempt to create various rules using the iptables
and ip6tables commands. This may result in module autoloading (eg, for
IPv6).
Proceed with checks (Y/n)?
== IPv4 ==
Creating 'ufw-check-requirements'... done
Inserting RETURN at top of 'ufw-check-requirements'... done
TCP: pass
UDP: pass
destination port: pass
source port: pass
ACCEPT: pass
DROP: pass
REJECT: pass
LOG: pass
hashlimit: pass
limit: pass
ctstate (NEW): pass
ctstate (RELATED): pass
ctstate (ESTABLISHED): pass
ctstate (INVALID): pass
ctstate (new, recent set): pass
ctstate (new, recent update): pass
ctstate (new, limit): pass
interface (input): pass
interface (output): pass
multiport: pass
comment: pass
addrtype (LOCAL): pass
addrtype (MULTICAST): pass
addrtype (BROADCAST): pass
icmp (destination-unreachable): pass
icmp (source-quench): pass
icmp (time-exceeded): pass
icmp (parameter-problem): pass
icmp (echo-request): pass

== IPv6 ==
Creating 'ufw-check-requirements6'... done
Inserting RETURN at top of 'ufw-check-requirements6'... done
TCP: pass
UDP: pass
destination port: pass
source port: pass
ACCEPT: pass
DROP: pass
REJECT: pass
LOG: pass
hashlimit: pass
limit: pass
ctstate (NEW): pass
ctstate (RELATED): pass
ctstate (ESTABLISHED): pass
ctstate (INVALID): pass
ctstate (new, recent set): pass
ctstate (new, recent update): pass
ctstate (new, limit): pass
interface (input): pass
interface (output): pass
multiport: pass
comment: pass
icmpv6 (destination-unreachable): pass
icmpv6 (packet-too-big): pass
icmpv6 (time-exceeded): pass
icmpv6 (parameter-problem): pass
icmpv6 (echo-request): pass
icmpv6 with hl (neighbor-solicitation): pass
icmpv6 with hl (neighbor-advertisement): pass
icmpv6 with hl (router-solicitation): pass
icmpv6 with hl (router-advertisement): pass
ipv6 rt: pass

All tests passed
-
root@loki:/lib/systemd/system# cat ufw.service
[Unit]
Description=Uncomplicated firewall
Documentation=man:ufw(8)
DefaultDependencies=no
Before=network.target
After=NetworkManager.service

[Service]
Type=oneshot
RemainAfterExit=yes
ExecStart=/lib/ufw/ufw-init start quiet
# ExecStartPost=/bin/sleep 10
ExecStop=/lib/ufw/ufw-init stop

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

-
root@loki:/lib/systemd/system# cat fail2ban.service
[Unit]
Description=Fail2Ban Service
Documentation=man:fail2ban(1)
After=network.target iptables.service firewalld.service ip6tables.service 
ipset.service nftables.service ufw.service
PartOf=firewalld.service

[Service]
Type=simple
ExecStartPre=/bin/mkdir -p /run/fail2ban
ExecStart=/usr/bin/fail2ban-server -xf start
# if should be logged in systemd journal, use following line or set logtarget 
to sysout in fail2ban.local
# ExecStart=/usr/bin/fail2ban-server -xf --logtarget=sysout start
ExecStop=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client stop
ExecReload=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client reload
PIDFile=/run/fail2ban/fail2ban.pid
Restart=on-failure
RestartPreventExitStatus=0 255

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

-
root@loki:/etc/default# cat ufw
# /etc/default/ufw
#

# Set to yes to apply rules to support IPv6 (no means only IPv6 on loopback
# accepted). You will need to 'disable' and then 'enable' the firewall for
# the changes to take affect.
IPV6=yes

# Set the default input policy to ACCEPT, DROP, or REJECT. Please note that if
# you change this you will most likely want to adjust your rules.
DEFAULT_INPUT_POLICY="DROP"

# Set the default output policy to ACCEPT, DROP, or REJECT. Please note that if
# you change this you will most likely want to adjust your rules.
DEFAULT_OUTPUT_POLICY="ACCEPT"

# Set the default forward policy to ACCEPT, DROP or REJECT.  Please note that
# if you change this you will most likely want to adjust your rules
DEFAULT_FORWARD_POLICY="DROP"

# Set the default application policy to ACCEPT, DROP, REJECT 

[Bug 1726856] Re: ufw does not start automatically at boot

2021-12-29 Thread Myron Szymanskyj
Same problem here.  Also when I "ufw enable" then several seconds later
networking stops. I have get Ubuntu to gracefully power-down using the
power-button and then gracefully power-up.

ufw 0.36

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726856

Title:
  ufw does not start automatically at boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1726856/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1890927] [NEW] Installing ubuntu studio 20.04.1 on Asus TUF706IU-AS76

2020-08-08 Thread Myron
Public bug reported:

I'm trying to install Ubuntu alongside pre-installed Windows on Asus TUF
series gaming notebook with AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU.  This system also
uses an NVME SSD as the system drive.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-lowlatency 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-lowlatency x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445.1
Date: Sat Aug  8 23:21:20 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz 
file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntustudio.seed splash acpi=off nouveau.modeset=0 
nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=5500 ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Studio 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15.2 ubuntustudio

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890927

Title:
  Installing ubuntu studio 20.04.1 on Asus TUF706IU-AS76

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1890927/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1364630] Re: init: Error while reading from descriptor: Broken pipe

2015-03-30 Thread myron
Init error reading from descriptor:Broken pipe.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364630

Title:
  init: Error while reading from descriptor: Broken pipe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/1364630/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1400517] [NEW] Please update Tomcat7 in trusty-security to >= 7.0.55 to enable easier server info hiding

2014-12-08 Thread Dave Myron
Public bug reported:

Tomcat 7.0.55 introduced the ability to more easily hide information
leaks by adding some configuration to error valve configurations.
Enabling these obfuscations help to minimize information sent out when
an error is reached.

Please update the trusty-security (& related) versions of tomcat7 to at
least 7.0.55 (current version as of 2014-12-08 is 7.0.57)

** Affects: tomcat7 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1400517

Title:
  Please update Tomcat7 in trusty-security to >= 7.0.55 to enable easier
  server info hiding

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1400517/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1211294] [NEW] Crash during 13.04 install, after manually creating partitions.

2013-08-12 Thread Myron Hobizal
Public bug reported:

Crash when installing Ubuntu. Manual partitioning.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: ubiquity 2.14.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.331
Date: Mon Aug 12 07:01:16 2013
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring third-party-packages ubiquity-2.14.6 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211294

Title:
  Crash during 13.04 install, after manually creating partitions.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1211294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987182] Re: apt 403 Forbidden on some packages

2012-12-21 Thread Dave Myron
This appears to have cropped up again. `apt-get source imagemagick`
fails with a 403 from us-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com ("west" fails in
the same way). `apt-get clean` and `apt-get update` doesn't resolve the
issue. I have the pipelining fix in place on 12.04.1 LTS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987182

Title:
  apt 403 Forbidden on some packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/s3aptmirror/+bug/987182/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 763228] Re: amarok crashed with SIGSEGV in Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl()

2011-04-16 Thread Myron Jones
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763228

Title:
  amarok crashed with SIGSEGV in Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 763228] [NEW] amarok crashed with SIGSEGV in Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl()

2011-04-16 Thread Myron Jones
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: amarok

Any time an iPhone 3G running Whited00r custom firmware connects to the
PC, upon clicking "local" in Amarok, Amarok crashes.  Also, neither
Amarok nor Rhythmbox will play music from the iPod.

I am using the Kubuntu Natty daily from 4/16 and have done all available
system updates

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: amarok 2:2.4.0-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Sat Apr 16 19:46:29 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/amarok
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta i386 (20110416)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/amarok
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x779b2a:mov%esi,(%esp)
 PC (0x00779b2a) ok
 source "%esi" ok
 destination "(%esp)" (0xbf5a2fe0) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
writable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: amarok
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.5
 Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl() const () from /usr/lib/libamaroklib.so.1
 Meta::Track::prettyName() const () from /usr/lib/libamarokcore.so.1
 Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl() const () from /usr/lib/libamaroklib.so.1
 Meta::Track::prettyName() const () from /usr/lib/libamarokcore.so.1
Title: amarok crashed with SIGSEGV in Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763228

Title:
  amarok crashed with SIGSEGV in Meta::MediaDeviceTrack::prettyUrl()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545693] Re: Audio wont play

2010-05-01 Thread Myron
I can't seem to cancel this bug. Issue was with Pulseaudio. It is
repaired now.

-- 
Audio wont play
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 569032] Re: Evolution + mapi = crash on startup in Lucid

2010-04-23 Thread Myron Uecker

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45107497/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Evolution + mapi = crash on startup in Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569032
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 569032] [NEW] Evolution + mapi = crash on startup in Lucid

2010-04-23 Thread Myron Uecker
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution-mapi

Running Lucid with the latest updates I tried to start evolution this
morning and the screen appeared and immediately went away.  Executing
evolution from the command line I got the following error:

exchange-mapi-connection.c:124: Entering mapi_profile_load

If I remove the evolution-mapi project, evolution will start.

I renamed my ~/.evolution directory and it didn't make any difference.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: evolution-mapi 0.28.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Apr 23 08:43:10 2010
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evolution-mapi

** Affects: evolution-mapi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug evolution i386 lucid mapi

-- 
Evolution + mapi = crash on startup in Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569032
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566791] Re: contacts are added and blocked. will not unblock

2010-04-19 Thread Myron

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44832275/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44832276/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44832277/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44832278/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
contacts are added and blocked. will not unblock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566791] [NEW] contacts are added and blocked. will not unblock

2010-04-19 Thread Myron
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kdenetwork

Msn contacts when added, are blocked. and will not unblock when
selected.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Apr 19 09:45:32 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/kopete
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: kopete 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu4
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic
SourcePackage: kdenetwork
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686

** Affects: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
contacts are added and blocked. will not unblock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 561387] Re: 2..32-20 kernel locks up on boot in less then a second

2010-04-12 Thread Myron Uecker
Similar problem this morning on my Thinkpad T-60.  There is a stack
trace on the screen that ends with "[0.345007] [(c0104887)] ?
kernel_thread_helper +0x7/0x10. After that is a code (three lines of hex
codes), EIP (acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0x131/0x168 SS:ESP
0060:f6835d70), CR2 (a lot of 0s followed by 9) then a list of the
drives on my system.  I took a photo of the screen, but I could not find
anything in the logs.

-- 
2..32-20 kernel locks up on boot in less then a second
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545693] Re: Audio wont play

2010-03-23 Thread Myron

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41799968/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41799969/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41799970/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41799971/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
Audio wont play
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545693] [NEW] Audio wont play

2010-03-23 Thread Myron
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: amarok

NO problems with audio card. Youtube plays audio fine, but amorok will
not

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Mar 23 20:30:19 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/amarok
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: amarok 2:2.2.0-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: amarok
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
Audio wont play
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384955] Re: ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time

2009-06-23 Thread Myron Uecker
I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.29-5 yesterday and have not had a single
freeze since then so there appears to be a fix in that kernel version.

-- 
ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384955] Re: ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time

2009-06-08 Thread Myron Uecker

** Attachment added: "Output of "lspci -vvv""
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27659302/lspciv.out

-- 
ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384955] [NEW] ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time

2009-06-08 Thread Myron Uecker
Public bug reported:

I received a brand new workstation (Dell Optiplex 960 with dual 360 gig
HDs running on an onboard RAID controller) and installed Jaunty x64 on
it last week using the alternate CD.  Since that time I have experienced
random freezes of my machine.  It appears to be an issue with the built-
in isw RAID.  The machine doesn't totally lock up (I can move the mouse,
access menus, etc.), but anything related to hard drive activity
completely stops.  I have noticed this in Firefox, Thunderbird, and
Eclipse.  Compiz will grey the windows indicating they are not
responding and they will not take keystrokes.  Typing "ls" at a command
prompt will just sit there.  After a period of time (usually several
minutes) the machine will resume as if nothing happened.  I checked my
log files and cannot find anything logged when this happens.

It is not an issue of memory, the machine has 8 gig on board and only
about a third in use most of the time.  I have not found a consistent
pattern to cause the issue.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ISW RAID freezes for minutes at a time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 242027] Re: bug to be reported against update manager

2008-06-21 Thread Myron Lewis

** Attachment added: "main.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503726/main.log

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503727/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503728/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503729/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503730/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15503731/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz

-- 
bug to be reported against update manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 242027] [NEW] bug to be reported against update manager

2008-06-21 Thread Myron Lewis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

samba not upgraded because of prior modifications to samba

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun 21 19:30:30 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Package: samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.2
PackageArchitecture: i386
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Triaged


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
bug to be reported against update manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 34199] Re: Evolution cannot connect to Exchange backend process

2008-06-10 Thread Myron Uecker
I think they broke it again in the last couple of updates.  Today I
cannot get Evolution to keep its connection more than a few minutes.
Yesterday it worked most of the day.  I enabled pre-release updates and
even that is not helping now.

Every few weeks I'm on support and get added to a couple of different
mailing lists.  Yesterday I came in after the weekend and had about 6800
messages in my inbox.  I have been working ever since to get the filters
to run long enough to clear them out.  Yesterday I let it run all day
and it slowly worked its way through and had about 1500 when I walked
in.  I have restarted many times so far today and each time it seems to
crash faster than the previous restart.  Earlier I was getting about 60
messages at a time, now it crashes after about 15 messages (about 2
minutes).

I guess that's what I get for accepting updates to Evolution :(

-- 
Evolution cannot connect to Exchange backend process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 112220] Re: "Connect to Server" attempts connect in background

2007-07-19 Thread Myron Uecker
Once I removed the files, the problem never recurred, so yes, it did fix
the problem.

-- 
"Connect to Server" attempts connect in background
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112220
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 112220] Re: "Connect to Server" attempts connect in background

2007-05-04 Thread Myron Uecker
The problem has continued today despite my best efforts to solve it.  I
came very close to removing samba and smbclient, but I may have found
something.  In my .nautilus/metadata folder, there are a bunch of smb*
files.  I deleted those files hoping that will stop Nautilus from
attempting to connect to those network shares.

-- 
"Connect to Server" attempts connect in background
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112220
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 112220] "Connect to Server" attempts connect in background

2007-05-03 Thread Myron Uecker
Public bug reported:

I think I have finally tracked down the most irritating problem I have
had under Feisty so far.  Several times a day my network password has
been getting revoked since upgrading.  Today I ran wireshark and
searched through the packet dump.  I found several SMB ACCESS_DENIED and
ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT messages within the output.  The messages were coming
from multiple servers I had originally entered into the Places->Connect
to Server option as Windows Shares under Edgy.  It appears that the
system is attempting to connect to these servers even though I have not
clicked the icons or made any attempt to use those shares.  There is
never a password prompt so I do not know what password it is attempting
to use, but it must be using the correct user id.  I have removed all
passwords from my keyring that specify my network user id.

When my account got locked out this morning, I only saw an SMB handshake
with one ACCESS_DENIED message followed shortly by ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT to
only one server within the 10 minute period I was monitoring.  Shortly
after firing up wireshark, I verified my password was working.  Before
stopping wireshark, I verified my account was locked out.  As far as I
have been able to discover, these SMB packets are causing my network id
to get revoked.

After seeing these messages I unmounted all of the network shares I had
mapped, but have not rebooted since and the messages continue to appear
so it must still be attempting to connect to those severs.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
"Connect to Server" attempts connect in background
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112220
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs