[Bug 1714659] Re: HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

2021-04-01 Thread noon
** Also affects: hplip (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793675
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714659

Title:
  HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on
  this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1714659/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1714659] Re: HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

2021-03-31 Thread noon
I suggest that the hplip maintainers update the file

hplip/hplip-systray.desktop.in

by adding this line at the end:

  NotShowIn=GNOME;

I think doing this will close:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1714659 (this bug)
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1721534
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1770027
- and a lot of other downstream bugs like 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793675


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #793675
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793675

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714659

Title:
  HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on
  this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1714659/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1714659] Re: HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

2021-03-31 Thread noon
The hp-systray command is commonly started as part of the session's
autostart; for example, in Debian.

When it doesn't find a system tray on the current environment, it
displays an error dialog box.

This is the case of GNOME which has dropped support for the system tray
functionality in favour of a unified "notifications" functionality,
pushing developers to quit relying on a system tray.

This comes from hplip/ui4/systemtray.py where
QSystemTrayIcon.isSystemTrayAvailable() returns False when run under
GNOME.

Solutions I see:
- Change the /etc/xdg/autostart/hplip-systray.desktop and add a property 
(NotShowIn, see 
https://specifications.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s03.html) to not 
start in GNOME. It simply means adding this line: NotShowIn=GNOME;
- Change the hplip code to fail silently if it detects that there is no system 
tray. This might hide real issues however.
- Add a new dedicated binary package for hplip-gui-systray, and do not install 
it by default, especially for GNOME users.
- Understand the functionality of hp-systray and implement an alternative using 
GNOME's notifications; choose it when running in GNOME.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714659

Title:
  HPLIP is not compatible with modern GNOME (No system tray detected on
  this system. Unable to start, exiting.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1714659/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1287127] Re: Linux-image 3.11.0-17-generic can't boot

2014-03-13 Thread k-noon
Same problem here, 3.11.0-17-generic, 3.11.0-18-generic doesn't work for
me, only the 3.11.0-15-generic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1287127

Title:
  Linux-image 3.11.0-17-generic can't boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-saucy/+bug/1287127/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 366728] Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not loading from .profile nor /etc/environment

2013-10-04 Thread noon
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 47958 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47958

The cleanest workaround would be the comment #17 above (except maybe naming the 
file 89preserve_ld_library_path instead of 90preserve...).
The fix would be to add that code into the 90x11-common_ssh-agent script with 
an explanatory comment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366728

Title:
  LD_LIBRARY_PATH not loading from .profile nor /etc/environment

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/366728/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 878612] Re: Linker fails when compiling fuse files with "undefined reference to `fuse_main_real'

2013-07-03 Thread noon
LDFLAGS is the variable for the linker flags.
Linker libs such as -lfuse should be put in the LDLIBS variable, not in LDFLAGS.

To solve the problem and simplify the Makefile at the same time:

In the Makefile, the LDFLAGS definition should be replaced with LDLIBS:

LDLIBS := $(shell pkg-config fuse --libs)

Also the 2-line fusexmp_fh section should be simplified with:

fusexml_fh: LDLIBS += -lulockmgr

(To make it even cleaner, there should be separate CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS
pkg-config settings: --cflags-only-other and --cflags-only-I
respectively)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878612

Title:
  Linker fails when compiling fuse files with "undefined reference to
  `fuse_main_real'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fuse/+bug/878612/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1155327] Re: skype crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc@plt()

2013-05-07 Thread k-noon
ld.so: object '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/mesa/libGL.so.1' from LD_PRELOAD cannot 
be preloaded: ignored.
Falha de segmentação (imagem do núcleo gravada)

:(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qtwebkit-source in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155327

Title:
  skype crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc@plt()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glib/+bug/1155327/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 945798] Re: colord crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2012-04-27 Thread k-noon
Up

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945798

Title:
  colord crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/945798/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 356261] Re: Bitlbee does not start at boot time

2009-12-27 Thread noon
Karmic doesn't have this problem

On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Kenyon Ralph
wrote:

> Is this still a problem? I'm pretty sure BitlBee started at boot last
> time I booted my Ubuntu karmic server, which was 45 days ago, with
> BitlBee 1.2.4-1.
>
> --
> Bitlbee does not start at boot time
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356261
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “bitlbee” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: bitlbee
>
> Upon upgrading to Jaunty, bitlbee no longer starts up at boot time.
> Instead, I have to manually issue a /etc/init.d/bitlbee restart once network
> is up to get it started.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> Architecture: i386
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
> Package: bitlbee 1.2.3-1
> ProcEnviron:
>  PATH=(custom, user)
>  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: bitlbee
> Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitlbee/+bug/356261/+subscribe
>

-- 
Bitlbee does not start at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 356261] Re: Bitlbee does not start at boot time

2009-09-30 Thread noon
Confirmed on Jaunty 64 bit as well

-- 
Bitlbee does not start at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs