[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182468] Re: Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree
I've just come here to report this exact bug as described above. Also using U 7.10. After uninstall then install with Synaptic to try to fix my Opera flash trouble, I too had empty target directories and thus no longer had flash working in Firefox either. With a little digging I came up the same observations as Leigh. I've checked my Edubuntu 7.10 machine, which has no trouble with flash, and found that it is still using the older flashplugin-nonfree files, despite showing all updates in Synaptic. Looks like Synaptic also hit the checksum issue during update and did not complete, and thus did not overwrite the older files. Both of my installs were fresh in October. The flashplugin-free problem came up in December and is reported here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin- nonfree/+bug/173890 -- Synaptic incorectly reports a succesfull instalation of flashplugin-nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91418] Re: Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy
6.10 has not applied DST. AMD desktop running a generic & updated Ubuntu. Dual boots w98, but w98 has not been booted recently. Ubuntu Forums has several similar reports, but no pattern has emerged: some machines applied DST, some didn't. $ sudo dpkg -s tzdata Password: Package: tzdata Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: libs Installed-Size: 5728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2007b-0ubuntu0.6.10 Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers $ sudo zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 -- Daylight savings time not updated properly in edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/91418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
This seems to be a miss-print in the English version too. Compare this man page entry from Ubuntu 7.04... " SOURCES.LIST.D The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add sources.list entries in seperate files that end with sources.list file. " ...with this one from http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list: " Description The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package distribution system in use on the system. This control file is located in /etc/apt/sources.list and additionally any files ending in .list in /etc/apt/sources.list.d are included. " I suspect someone made a bit of a slip during a cut'n'paste edit. This may affect quite a few translations. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107641] Re: possible error in sources.list manpage
The man page for Ubuntu 7.10 has been corrected. Probably this has made it to the translations and this bug can be closed? 7.10 currently uses version 2.62-1, and 7.04 currently uses version 2.39-1. -- possible error in sources.list manpage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Public bug reported: Server is Edubuntu 7.10, client is Ubuntu 7.10. If the server is shut down before the share is unmounted by the client, the client's GUI file managers hang until the client is rebooted. According to the manpage for umount.nfs, the '-f' option is meant to "Force unmount the file system in case of unreachable NFS system." Unfortunately it doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo umount.nfs /home/o/files/nfs -f umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads' umount2: Device or resource busy Hence I suspect a bug, but with precisely what, I couldn't say. What more information would you like? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162786] Re: Forced umount.nfs doesn't work
Actually it's not a bug, and it does work. 'umount2: Device or resource busy' can be avoided by including 'hard,intr' in the NFS fstab line. Since the processes can now be interrupted, the client's GUI file managers no longer hang after the forcing umount.nfs. The 'umount.nfs -f' will still return the line, 'umount.nfs: Server failed to unmount '192.168.0.2:/home/o/files/downloads'', but this is only because it cannot override an fstab entry. So to repeat, this is not a bug, merely an unfriendliness, and if someone can delete this report to spare other devs wasting time reading it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Forced umount.nfs doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
This isn't fixed. I have the same error as described in original post, except CPU AthlonXP. The i386 9.04 LiveCD was downloaded and burned last night. Memtest OK, disk integrity OK, checksum OK. Tried to get valgrind log for you, but lacking Nautilus, I got stuck for how to locate & attach. Tried to install Dolphin, but installation failed due to crashes. FWIW, the 8.04 LiveCD works fine. -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366526] Re: nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes
Aha - fix is in the pipeline. Thanks, folks. (Solution is to update Brasero to version from Proposed. Thread here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1135678 ) -- nautilus. GLib-ERROR **: ... failed to allocate 1073741824 bytes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
