[Bug 1874578] Re: [wayland] dock has very long load time
I can confirm that after a 'gsettings set org.gnome.shell.extensions.dash-to-dock show-mounts false' the icons appear immediately after login. Thanx Nicolas! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874578 Title: [wayland] dock has very long load time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874578] Re: dock has very long load time
It happens only for wayland. Just tried out again with the tester account. Attached is the output of gio and journalctl for that account. As you can see gio reports two SSD, a HDD, and a DVD but not other mount. ** Attachment added: "gio.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+attachment/5364522/+files/gio.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874578 Title: dock has very long load time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874578] Re: dock has very long load time
I have no disks mounted by default. And I use the default theme. I just created a new user for testing and it happens for that one too as soon as you switch to the wayland-session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874578 Title: dock has very long load time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874578] Re: dock has very long load time
I can confirm the bug. Happens also to me. Have attached my journalctl. ** Description changed: I just upgraded from Ubuntu 18.04 to 20.04. When I boot my system I have to wait at least 10 to 15 seconds for the application icons to load on dock. Meanwhile everything else seems to be working properly. I didn't experience this behavior in Ubuntu 18.04. Also the dock doesn't trigger when I move my cursor to the left of the screen. (I have set the docker to Auto-Hide mode and it's position is on the left of my screen). - --- + --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-03 (1359 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 67ubuntu20.04.5 PackageArchitecture: all ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30 Tags: focal third-party-packages wayland-session Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-23 (0 days ago) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo wireshark _MarkForUpload: True ** Attachment added: "journalctl.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+attachment/5363453/+files/journalctl.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874578 Title: dock has very long load time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1874578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43105] Re: Fuzzy Font Rendering
The font rendering is still crap. As said above monodevelop does not use it anymore. -- Fuzzy Font Rendering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 442495] Re: mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab
Fortunately, all my partitions in /dev/disks/by-uuid reappeared again. So I cannot reproduce the initial problem. But you can reproduce the hanging boot easily by creating a /home mount with a wrong uuid in /etc/fstab. I have tested this approach (intentionally giving the wrong uuid of my /home partition) with mountall versions 0.2.2 as it is in karmic at the time of writing this and 0.2.2~boot2 as published in ppa. In both cases the boot hangs and cannot be interrupted, neither with ctrl-c nor with sysreq-e. Sysreq-e kills udev but not mountall anymore. Uninstalling cryptsetup so that ctrl-c might work does not help either. You need either a live-cd or another boot-partition to get the system running again. Attached is the output of mountall --debug of 0.2.2 with my correct and incorrect /etc/fstab before the reboot as requested. ** Attachment added: m-0.22.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33726055/m-0.22.log ** Attachment added: m-0.22-bad.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33726056/m-0.22-bad.log -- mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 442495] Re: mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab
Attached is the output before reboot with karmic and ppa mountall. Note that mountall with karmic mountall does not terminate. I had to stop it with a ctrl-c. What is attached is the output until that point. The boot with new mountall itself hangs and cannot be interrupted by sysreq-e. Thus I was not able to debug. Actually it even hangs in case I use the /dev/sda5 in fstab. So I have no idea why and where it hangs. Actually, I see now all the disks in /dev/disk/by-uuid. I have no idea what changed in the system. I can do more tests in about a week. On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 02:15 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: I've uploaded a new mountall package to the ubuntu-boot PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-boot/+archive/ppa I would appreciate it if you could install this and try it out. *BEFORE* you reboot though, could you run sudo mountall --debug mountall.log 21 and attach that to this bug - then after you reboot, let me know whether it worked or not. Thanks ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete ** Attachment added: mountall-0.1.8.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33345893/mountall-0.1.8.log ** Attachment added: mountall-0.2.0-boot3.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33345894/mountall-0.2.0-boot3.log -- mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 442491] [NEW] not all disks created in /dev/disks/by-uuid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev I am not sure that the problem is with udev. But anyhow, I have an inconsistency with /dev/disks/by-uuid. The filesystem /dev/sda5 is not in /dev/disks/by-uuid. But I can mount it specifying the device. And it was there after installation (note that I have replaced the UUID mount in /etc/fstab with the device-mount to be able to boot). There was a dbus- and a kernel-update. But none of those look very suspicious. Any idea how to debug this? What kind of log do you need? $ sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda5 |grep UUID Filesystem UUID: f9b5a20e-4270-45f9-ab2a-09196a50a80c $ ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2009-10-04 20:37 8378e311-ccbb-4956-9732-a7f47ec81b74 - ../../sda3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2009-10-04 20:37 94340636-b074-49f0-ab04-1d6dac575a9d - ../../sda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2009-10-04 20:37 a3b47868-5540-4994-a363-b8b0ffaa1ab3 - ../../sda6 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2009-10-04 20:37 daf72b11-bd81-4e65-9c40-064b17333523 - ../../sda2 $ grep f9 /etc/fstab #UUID=f9b5a20e-4270-45f9-ab2a-09196a50a80c /home ext3defaults 0 2 $ grep sda5 /etc/fstab # /home was on /dev/sda5 during installation /dev/sda5 /home ext3defaults0 2 # /dev/sda5 $ mount |grep sda5 /dev/sda5 on /home type ext3 (rw) ** Affects: udev (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- not all disks created in /dev/disks/by-uuid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 442495] [NEW] mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall Due to some unrelated problem my contained an entry to a UUDI mount where /dev/disks/by-uuid was not available. Instead of giving an error mountall simply hangs. Probably due to starting cryptsetup stealing keyboard input (hint from another bugreport for mountall) it was not even possible to stop it with ctrl-c. Fortunately an alt-sysrequest-e killed mountall and dropped me to a shell where I could analyse the problem. This is definitely not a user-friendly error-behavior. ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mountall hangs in case of inconsistent /etc/fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363426] Re: LUKS automount fails with jaunty
It works again here. No problem with file:/// and whatsoever. -- LUKS automount fails with jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381695] [NEW] update-files Forbidden [IP: 141.76.2.130 80]
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager W:Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jaunty- updates/multiverse/source/Sources.gz 403 Forbidden [IP: 141.76.2.130 80] ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-files Forbidden [IP: 141.76.2.130 80] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363426] Re: LUKS automount fails with jaunty
I can confirm the bug and the workaround. I have two partitions on the disk, first is FAT, second is LUKS. More information or tests available on request. -Peter -- LUKS automount fails with jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155936] Re: trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files
Yes. -- trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305745] Re: after upgrading to intrepid 8.10, impossible to unlock encrypted disk with new kernels in 8.10
The problem might be the same as in bug #267192. Actually the supplied password was correct but kernel module dm_crypt is not loaded in this scenario. * modprobe dm_crypt This helped me in an unrelated error-case. For some reason in my default intrepid install with manually installing cryptsetup via ' apt-get install' I had no dm_crypt loaded either. The modprobe solved the problem. I will put it to /etc/modules as a quick solution. -- after upgrading to intrepid 8.10, impossible to unlock encrypted disk with new kernels in 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 155936] Re: trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files
No, it does index not hang and indexes files in the tar I had attached to the bug-report. Regards ,Peter On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 05:02 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10? ** Tags added: testcase ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247608] Re: [Intrepid] touchpad on dell laptop does not scroll
Vertical/horizontal scrolling have always been enabled in System-Preferences-Touchpad after the upgrade to intrepid. I can also control horizontal scrolling with the setting in the Touchpad-tab. Setting vertical scrolling has no effect. I have also attached the output of 'xinput list-props'. Strange enough there is nothing about vertical/horizontal scrolling. BR, Peter ** Attachment added: xinput-list-props.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18701446/xinput-list-props.txt -- [Intrepid] touchpad on dell laptop does not scroll https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247608] Re: [Intrepid] touchpad on dell laptop does not scroll
Does not work for me. Horizontal scrolling works as before, no change to vertical scrolling. It does enable SHMConfig, but wrt vertical scrolling nothing changes. Find attached the synclient -l report. BTW, you need to restart hal to to activate the above mentioned change. -Peter ** Attachment added: synclient-l.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18662234/synclient-l.txt -- [Intrepid] touchpad on dell laptop does not scroll https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271925] Re: tracker plugin not detected
The reason is because: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/deskbar-applet/deskbar-applet -d -w ... 10-11 17:46:41 deskbar.core.ModuleLoader ERRORproblem in /usr/lib/deskbar-applet/modules-2.20-compatible/tracker-module.py - type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named gnomedesktop Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/deskbar/core/ModuleLoader.py, line 98, in import_module mod = pydoc.importfile (filename) File /usr/lib/python2.5/pydoc.py, line 259, in importfile raise ErrorDuringImport(path, sys.exc_info()) ErrorDuringImport: problem in /usr/lib/deskbar-applet/modules-2.20-compatible/tracker-module.py - type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named gnomedesktop It needs porting. Commenting out the offending import and doing a return 0 in the respective routing where gnomedesktop is used lets it start again. However, I have no idea what functionality is lost. Crazy that such a feature is in this state at beta. I thought tracker is the default ubuntu desktop search and deskbar-applet the standard way to use it? Is nobody using this? -- tracker plugin not detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 43105] Fuzzy Font Rendering
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 15:52 +, Adam Niedling wrote: The original reported doesn't mention Ubuntu version. Is this problem solved already? ** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid Here it looks like that Monodevelop does not use the 'DejaVu Sans, ExtraLight' anymore. So for what it counts it is solved for monodevelop. It does not use the bad font by default anymore. It is still valid that 'DejaVu Sans, ExtraLight' is rendered plain ugly. Just do a 'gnome-font-viewer fonts:///DejaVu%20Sans%2C%20Ultra-Light' on your favorite LCD-screen. BR, Peter -- Fuzzy Font Rendering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 117773] Re: Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support
That's okay because it is not a module: /boot$ grep ACPI_EC config-2.6.22-14-generic CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y Here is the dmesg how ec/sbs show up in the new kernel: [8.069115] ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT [8.070816] ACPI: EC: GPE=0x1d, ports=0x66, 0x62 [ 24.832000] ACPI: Smart Battery System [SBS0]: AC Adapter [AC0] (on-line) [ 25.544000] ACPI: Smart Battery System [SBS0]: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present) Your problem is definitely a different story than this bug. Create a new bug-report, attach the respective output and hope someone finds time to look at it. Alternatively test with the latest vanilla kernel and report problems directly to the ACPI people. -Peter Kovács Zoltán wrote: I found that drivers/acpi/i2c_ec.c no longer exists (in 2.6.22). Does anybody has another idea what to do in Ubuntu Gutsy? -- Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155936] Re: trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files
The tar with the bad files. ** Attachment added: test-i18n.tar http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10123443/test-i18n.tar -- trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155936] trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tracker After gutsy upgrade tracker started indexing my home. It never finished and I tracked it down to the following directories and files (will attach a tar). tmp$ ls -g test-i18n total 12 -rw-r--r-- 1 ooops0 2000-09-30 22:02 arch.tgz drwxr-xr-x 2 ooops 4096 2006-09-30 19:35 dir -rwxr-xr-x 1 ooops0 2000-09-30 21:36 exe -rw-r--r-- 1 ooops0 2000-09-30 21:36 file -rw-r--r-- 1 ooops 10 2002-12-31 15:29 hügo.dat -rw-r--r-- 1 ooops0 2000-09-30 21:37 image.jpg lrwxrwxrwx 1 ooops4 2007-10-22 21:37 link - file prw-r--r-- 1 ooops0 2000-09-30 21:55 pipe drwxr-xr-x 2 ooops 4096 2006-09-30 19:35 €uro utf8 Apparently it simply stops waiting for something to happen. To try it out kill your trackerd, unpack the attached tar in some directory and start trackerd in that directory: trackerd -v 2 -s 0 -i test-i18n It will indicate that it has started indexing for some of the files and after that do nothing anymore. Stopping it with ctrl-c does not work. It receives the signal but hangs afterwards. Watching directory /media/sda5/ooops/test-i18n/dir (total watches = 8) Indexing /media/sda5/ooops/test-i18n/dir with service Folders and mime Folder (new) Indexing /media/sda5/ooops/test-i18n/€uro utf8 with service Folders and mime Folder (new) Received signal 'Interrupt' so now shutting down Total allocations = 20, total deallocations = 10 ** Affects: tracker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- trackerd hangs during indexing of the attached files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 117773] Re: Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support
I tested it a few days ago with tribe-5 or 4 and it worked. However, given the record of this bug and the absence of any real statements of the kernel-team I would not assume that you can trust on that in the future. They triaged the bug as medium which is in the best case a we are sorry. Apparently, stable release and regression is still an unfamiliar word to the kernel-team of Ubuntu. Regards, Peter Walter Wunsch wrote: the same on my acer extensa 3000! i copied the old ko and it is o.k. so nobody of the ubuntu team will fix the bug! i think its because the problem is not a generell prob! on my hp nc6400 everything is o.k.! now my questions: will this be fixed in gutsy? if not, will the ko-fix work in gutsy? if not, i will look around for an other distribution. -- Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117773] Re: Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support
The fast solution is described at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/117773/comments/15. Just copy i2c_ec.ko of the .15 kernel-version over the new one. This will also work for future 'security' updates of the kernel as long as the respective ABI is stable, i.e. who knows how long. The real problem is that the Ubuntu kernel team releases untested non- security patches as part of a security update. That is the work of amateurs (amateur is about the nicest word I can find for it ;-). -- Regression: Kernel 2.6.20-16 breaks Smart-battery ACPI support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96566] Re: movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions
Thunderbird does not use the stand-alone movemail. And since, for very good security reasons!, thunderbird is not set-group-id mail there is no way that an internal 'movemail' could work given the permissions given above. -- movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118031] Regression: loading of i2c_ec fails after kernel upgrade to linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 After the latest security-upgrade from linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic to 16 the loading of i2c_ec fails. As a consquence I loose battery-status reporting via acpi. I think the problem will happen to all laptops with a sbs connected to an i2c_ec bus. The symptom is exactly the same as already showed up during feisty-beta testing in bug #96480 (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/96480/comments/24 for the description of my problem). Looking at the changelog I would guess that the following commit introduces the regression: * Prevent i2c_ec module from faulting becasue of uninitialized device parent. - GIT-SHA 490e63428ab4b3801bc94f520097fd43a57fbc3f I am quite disappointed that you released a security update of a stable kernel with such an invasive patch that is not related to security issues. I can test if reverting this patch solves the problem for me. Please do not introduce such patches in security updates of a stable kernel!!! $ dpkg -s linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic Package: linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: base Installed-Size: 69616 Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: linux-source-2.6.20 Version: 2.6.20-16.28 ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Regression: loading of i2c_ec fails after kernel upgrade to linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109579] thumbnail problems with relative soft-links
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gthumb
I have a non-standard setup regarding my home directory. Instead of
hard-mounting a partition to /home II use a symbolic link pointing
/media/sda5 which is the actual. The problem is that if I create the
link as a relative link
cd /; ln -s media/sda5 home
I get an error message (see strace below) in case a thumbnail is
accesses by gthumb. Clearly the lstat64 to '/sda5' is nonsense. No
thumbnails are shown because they are apparently not found. In case I
create the link as
cd /; ln -s /media/sda5 /home
everything is fine. Nautilus also did not show thumbnails until I
deleted ~/.thumbnails. After that at least nautilus displayed thumbnails
again. However, in case of gthumb only setting the link works. So I am
not sure if this a library problem (have no idea, what code is shared
regarding thumbnails between nautilus and gthumb). But in any case some
code wrt. to thumbnails following symbolic links is buggy.
Kind regards, Peter
===
lstat64(/home/ooops/pictures/0new/DSCN1643.JPG, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
st_size=645713, ...}) = 0
lstat64(/home, {st_mode=S_IFLNK|0777, st_size=10, ...}) = 0
readlink(/home, media/sda5, 256)= 10
lstat64(/sda5, 0xbfc5fbfc)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
write(2, \n** (gthumb:6358): WARNING **: F..., 47
** (gthumb:6358): WARNING **: File not found
** Affects: gthumb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
thumbnail problems with relative soft-links
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 109579] Re: thumbnail problems with relative soft-links
Sorry, forgot that. Standard feisty - 3:2.10.2-0ubuntu1. -Peter Michael Chudobiak wrote: What version of gthumb do you have? - Mike -- thumbnail problems with relative soft-links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96480] Re: Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug
I get the new 'unitialized parent' instead of the old 'forgot to specify physical address' message. Consequently the acpi-module using i2c, namely sbs, is not working. Everything else is okay as is it was with your last i2c_ec. Are you sure you reverted also your intermediate change? This is on a Acer TM3200 with 2.6.20-14.22. Cannot use 23 because of a bug and 24 is not available yet. ** Attachment added: boot.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7322091/boot.txt -- Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96480] Re: Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug
Find attached the ooops generated using the kernel you provided above (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/96480/comments/26) . As already told before this is booting the emergency target and manually pulling in the respective acpi modules with 'modprobe sbs'. Can you point me to the patches (git?) between 12 and 13 that affect i2c-ec? I can burn some time and cpu- cycles here to debug the problem. Finally, I agree to the previous posters. Most probably, the bug will affect all Acer TM that have an sbs connected via an ec-controller. Introducing such a regression _after_ beta-release is not a good PR for ubuntu. ** Attachment added: ooops with your kernel - acer tm3200 http://librarian.launchpad.net/7301389/boot.txt -- Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96480] Re: Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug
On a Acer TM3200 booting in emergency mode will not trigger anything since i2c_ec is pulled in later. In any case, emergency-booting and doing a manual 'modprobe i2c_ec' will produce the uninitialized parent message. I guess the i2c-bus is not initialized since a following 'modprobe sbs' returns after a few seconds but fails to produce any results. No kernel-message, no /proc/acpi/battery entry. So the i2c-bus is not working. Here is what I can see of the embedded controller: $ cat /proc/acpi/embedded_controller/EC0/info gpe: 0x1d ports: 0x66, 0x62 use global lock: no -- Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51492] Re: movemail problem
Does that look accurate on how to reproduce this bug? To reproduce: 1. from the command line: $ echo test | mail -s none username 2. Press Control+Shift+T or select the Get All New Messages menu item... mail does not show up. However, selecting Get New Messages for movemail works. Yes, with the precondition that you have two accounts. A local movemail account and a remote pop3 account. I have not tested it with other combinations (movemail only, imap instead of pop3, etc.) -- movemail problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80728] Re: gtkam-0.1.14 missing Gnome menu icon
Same here. I can confirm this for 0.1.14-0ubuntu1. -- gtkam-0.1.14 missing Gnome menu icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96480] Re: Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug
FWIW this is also present in 2.6.20-14 on an Acer TM3200. Probably the i2c-ec-driver pulled in by sbs (sbs is read via ec)? In the working 2.6.20-12 I get the following warining message. At that point it hangs in 2.6.20-14. If you need further info/tests let me know. [ 27.576000] **WARNING** I2C adapter driver [] forgot to specify physical device; fix it! [ 27.576000] ACPI: EC HC smbus [SMBC] -- Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89474] Re: thunderbird: interval checking doesn't work for Unix mail account
I can confirm this bug. This has always been the behavior of thunderbird for me, i.e. for all releases ever. It is still present in 1.5.010 in feisty. Also I think this is a duplicate for Ubuntu #51492. The upstream bug number is Bug 278383. No progress for a couple of years. -- thunderbird: interval checking doesn't work for Unix mail account https://launchpad.net/bugs/89474 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96566] movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-thunderbird After a fresh feisty install /var/mail has the permission: drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail 4096 2007-03-26 18:34 /var/mail Due to this mozilla-thunderbird cannot create the required lock-file for a movemail account. It suggests to change the permission to 01777. Apparently /var/mail is not owned by any package. So I report the problem to mozilla-thunderbird. ** Affects: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions https://launchpad.net/bugs/96566 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51492] Re: movemail problem
The URL for the upstream bug is: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278383 -- movemail problem https://launchpad.net/bugs/51492 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96480] Re: Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug
I have the same oops. Maybe the following helps to locate the problem. My laptop hangs during boot because 'modprobe sbs' hangs, i.e. the oops is caused by the sbs-module. -- Kernel 2.6.20-13 acpi bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/96480 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
