[Bug 833296] Re: abc numbering not automatic in libreoffice writer
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #47335 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47335 ** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47335 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833296 Title: abc numbering not automatic in libreoffice writer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/833296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946269] [NEW] Sync radare 1:1.5.2-4.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync radare 1:1.5.2-4.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Fixes an RC bug that is considered serious (it is about the freeness of the package) and it doesn't introduce any features or changes so risk is almost zero Changelog entries since current precise version 1:1.5.2-4: radare (1:1.5.2-4.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Bug fix: Doesn't contain source for waf binary code, thanks to Gerfried Fuchs (Closes: #654497). -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:38:41 +0100 ** Affects: radare (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946269 Title: Sync radare 1:1.5.2-4.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radare/+bug/946269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594866] Re: [Maverick][2.6.35] RT2860 (ralink) broken with rt2800pci
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659143 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659143
IMHO the best solution right now for natty is to switch back to
rt2860sta for this card by default, until rt2800pci is tested and
confirmed to work at least as well, for both the 64-bit and 32-bit
cases.
Something like this patch:
Index: mainline/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
===
--- mainline.orig/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
2011-05-03 14:54:48.168173002 +0300
+++ mainline/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c2011-05-03
14:54:57.378172995 +0300
@@ -1108,7 +1108,6 @@
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0601), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0681), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0701), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
- { PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0781), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x3090), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x3091), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x3092), PCI_DEVICE_DATA(rt2800pci_ops) },
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594866
Title:
[Maverick][2.6.35] RT2860 (ralink) broken with rt2800pci
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 654656] Re: ubuntu-vm-builder in maverick does not build maverick VMs
Here is a quick patch. I built / tested the resulting package and it seems to work fine. ** Patch added: patch to allow building also maverick images https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-vm-builder/+bug/654656/+attachment/1728958/+files/maverick_support.patch -- ubuntu-vm-builder in maverick does not build maverick VMs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599269] [NEW] use libinklevel for reporting toner levels
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-printer system-config-printer only seems to report toner levels for network printers whose driver reports them using SNMP. It would be nice to also utilize libinklevel for local printers, so that we don't have to use the command-line for this functionality. ** Affects: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ink libinklevel printer toner -- use libinklevel for reporting toner levels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.com wrote: The project plan for Eclipse 3.6 is here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse This is for the Eclipse platform though. Eclipse is a large place and there are many projects within Eclipse that have their own respective plans. WRT inclusion of eclipse in debian / ubuntu a promising direction is to utilize the eclipse-build system developed as part of the linux tools project upstream @ eclipse.org I think this project already has its first (alpha sort of) release. Otherwise there are a few existing packages but currently there seems to be a lack of volunteers. E.g., I have no time to continue my effort until next May due to serving in the greek army. To everyone complaining: feel free to look at the problem. If you have a use for eclipse there is a good chance you are a Java/Ant developer so why not contribute? -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392104] Re: [Karmic] Update to ca-certificates 20090624 prevents ca-certificates-java from installing
During our little coding camp in greece, this was one of the issues we looked into. It turns out it is possible to use libnss as a PKCS11 provider, thereby making the import of the specific certificate (and potential others in the future that want to use the same algorithm) work. The details are in http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=356 Since it only needs a new dependency openjdk - libnss and a simple config file this should be a viable solution. There is already a patched version of openjdk in my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~pktoss/+archive/ppa/ -- [Karmic] Update to ca-certificates 20090624 prevents ca-certificates-java from installing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:57 PM, aporteradrian-j6...@aporter.org wrote: Yes thanks very much for eclipse 3.4 in karmic. I have to ask, why does the eclipse-platform package depend on the firefox package? Eclipse uses a particular version of xulrunner for various functions e.g., to display the welcome page. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392103] Re: ca-certificates-java 20081028 fails to install (keytool error: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA384withECDSA Signature not available)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 392104 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392104 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #534520 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534520 ** Also affects: ca-certificates-java (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534520 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- ca-certificates-java 20081028 fails to install (keytool error: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA384withECDSA Signature not available) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392469] [NEW] kubuntu-desktop has no dependencies in karmic
Public bug reported: For some strange reason, kubuntu-desktop does not have any dependencies in current karmic. The easiest way to verify (without even having ubuntu installed) is to go to packages.ubuntu.com and look for kubuntu-desktop. Then look for e.g., ubuntu-desktop. The difference should be obvious :) I extracted the deb from the 1.131 version of kubuntu-desktop and indeed there are no dependencies in its control file. I 'm not sure how important kubuntu-desktop is, but a metapackage with no dependencies is a bit worthless :) ** Affects: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kubuntu-desktop has no dependencies in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392469] Re: kubuntu-desktop has no dependencies in karmic
And the obvious fix ** Attachment added: kubuntu-meta_1.131.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28413567/kubuntu-meta_1.131.patch -- kubuntu-desktop has no dependencies in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392791] [NEW] [karmic] Please remove 'konqueror-plugin-searchbar' from the kubuntu-desktop task
Public bug reported: The konq-plugins package has now replaced the individual 'konqueror-plugin-foo' packages. Yet, both konq-plugins and konqueror-plugin-searchbar are in the same task (kubuntu-desktop). Currently there is also a Conflicts: tag in konq-plugins so the task is uninstallable. (First the packages are declared to conflict with each-other and then apt is asked to install both. This makes no sense). The 'correct fix' imho is to remove konqueror-plugin-searchbar from the kubuntu-desktop task. To do that, http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/indices/override.karmic.main needs to change to remove the appropriate lines. It would be a good idea to remove konqueror-plugin-searchbar from kubuntu-meta (kubuntu-desktop/kubuntu-netbook) too. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [karmic] Please remove 'konqueror-plugin-searchbar' from the kubuntu-desktop task https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
The problem is that, for the most part, there is no debian/ubuntu eclipse team. There is mostly just individuals right now, many with almost no free time (e.g., I don't even use eclipse nowadays). Removing the ancient 3.2 version might help bring a few more interested developers to assist towards packaging 3.5. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
Btw, some things the eclipse team could do to make packagers' lives easier and increase the chances for an eclipse version that meets debian's high freedom/quality standards: * Test your code with openjdk. * Assist with building eclipse in a headless manner from the command-line. (this practically means test your code with eclipse-build and help fix the bugs) 2-3 redhat people trying to fix bugs in the ant scripts of more than 50 people doesn't really scale, especially if said 50 people continuously add new bugs :) There are other issues like proper policy for eclipse and plugins (placement within FHS) etc but debian people can deal with those and the build issue is currently the thorniest -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Vincenzo Cianciavincenzo...@yahoo.it wrote: I think the request to remove eclipse from ubuntu is extremely smart. If eclipse will want to be in ubuntu they'll need to cooperate themselves, as ubuntu clearly does not have enough man power. On the other hand, keeping ecliplse 3.2 gives a bad reputation to ubuntu. And if there is no such package, it's not too bad, since eclipse must be kept up-to date, and people using eclipse is typically used to get it from the web site. +1, please remove eclipse from ubuntu. How does one file such a request if there is a more proper way? Eclipse is now officially orphaned in upstream debian so it will probably be removed from ubuntu if nobody picks it up. I think the proper way to request a feature in ubuntu is via a blueprint in launchpad but I 'm not so sure. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Luca Saba lucas...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like too! Ready to learn! Testing is great but what is missing right now is someone with enough free time to do the actual work. I 'll hopefully have some free time in the beginnings of July but not before. -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
Well, why not aim for 3.5 instead? It is not like the work required to get 3.4.x in shape is any less, or that it would be finished before 3.5 is out anyway. (Of course that is just imho). -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
Fwiw: 1) The statement that eclipse doesn't need packaging and it is trivial to install standalone is imho *a joke*. The fact is, eclipse *does* have dependencies on other stuff that is installed via the package system (by far the most painful of which is, of course, mozilla/xulrunner). Packaging eclipse hopefully makes packagers responsible for making sure the installed versions of these dependencies are appropriate and won't cause problems (e.g., see the current bugs in fedora/debian where eclipse doesn't even start because the mozilla guys decided to change their API once more. Those are the kinds of problems that packaging is supposed to fix). 2) The hardest technical issue for packaging, is by far the eclipse build system. My package released in christmas (based on the fedora package) proved that it is indeed possible to get something that works (even with eclipse's new update/provisioning system, P2) but the size of packaging scripts and the number of patches that had to be applied to get things to work *almost* reasonably, shows this path is unfortunately unmaintainable in the long run. Even the Fedora/Redhat guys seem to be concerned with that issue. The linuxdistros eclipse project is working on a saner build system for eclipse (called eclipse-build) and rockwalrus has worked on a slightly different build system too (that I like a bit better). If you are really interested in seeing recent eclipse in shape for debian/ubuntu and are reasonably well versed in java/ant, you should really consider helping those efforts. There are also policy issues imho: E.g., should the osgi framework (equinox) be provided separately? (it is already used standalone by a few people). What should we do with the shared libraries? Other issues are simple but tedious stuff like packaging and pushing all the dependencies in a form that are usable by eclipse (at least an OSGified Manifest.MF). I have filed bugs for lots of the subtasks I could think of in https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse-debian My source has also been public from the beginning and is in a gitorious repository (eclipse-debian)* rockwalrus also has the eclipse-ubuntu effort. So, currently it seems nobody has the needed free time (I know I don't) to finish the job. But if everyone contributing complaints to this bug had invested a few hours to solve one of the documented subproblems, eclipse would be pretty ok by now ;) *git://gitorious.org/eclipse-debian/mainline.git -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330298] Re: mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade
I don't think this is a duplicate bug of #332270. #332270 is about a problem in udev rules while this one is clearly an mdadm packaging problem (packages should *not* silently override files in /etc. Especially if the consequence is that they remove your RAID arrays.) I was hit by this bug too and both the assessment and the workaround suggested by the OP are the same here as well. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 332270 udev repeatedly generates change events for the same block device(s) -- mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
As a christmas present, a pre-pre-pre-alpha version of an eclipse 3.4.1 package is now available in my PPA; http://launchpad.net/~pktoss/+archive Details are available in this email to pkg-java- maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java- maintainers/2008-December/018863.html I will quite likely not put any more development time on eclipse 3.4.x since 3.5Mx seems to be getting a better/easier build system, but I will most likely be available for questions/patch review should anyone decide to help with the fixes needed to get the package in shape for debian/ubuntu. So it 's mostly up to you from now on :-) -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309407] Re: Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT
Nah, it seems I didn't mention the difference that actually matters. It seems that running under fakeroot is the real problem. Still not sure if eclipse or java is to blame though -- Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309407] Re: Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT
Updating fakeroot to latest debian sid version (it is in my ppa) seems to fix the problem. So the bug should probably be closed as invalid, since openjdk is not actually at fault (?) -- Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309407] Re: Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = pkt (pktoss) Status: New = Invalid -- Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309407] [NEW] Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT
Public bug reported: Best way to reproduce: 1) Go to my ppa: http://launchpad.net/~pktoss/+archive 2) Copy the eclipse - 3.4.1-0~pkt2 package to your own ppa or download to an intrepid machine 3) Start a build: either amd64/i386 will work :( - or when at home: cd eclipse-3.4.1 debuild 4) Wait 40-50 minutes (hey, this is eclipse we are talking about :) 5) Observe it hang with Generate X where X is between 1 and 5 In reality, in all X cases it is hanging inside a java application that generates metadata (different app for each value of X). It is hanging in futex(..., FUTEX_WAIT, ...) (as an strace will convince you) A potentially interesting fact is that the val in the above call is always PID+1 i.e., if the PID of the hung java process is 5000 the above call will be like futex(an_addr, FUTEX_WAIT, 5001, NULL, ...) Unfortunately you won't be able to (at least I couldn't) reproduce by running just the app or even by just running the install.sh script in debian/scripts that contains this command. You have to run the full debuild for the bug to appear :( Another perhaps useful fact is that the package build will complete fine in debian sid which has a slightly older openjdk (b11 instead of b12 in intrepid). The bug has been reproduced in the following kernel/arch configurations: * 2.6.27/amd64 (latest intrepid kernel) inside a KVM VM * 2.6.28-rc8/amd64 slightly customized (small trivial one liners - network card bugfixes) physical machine * 2.6.21/i386 (an EC2 node) * Whatever the autobuilders run / both i386 and amd64 In a debian sid chroot in the customized 2.6.28-rc8/amd64 machine the debuild has succeeded all times so far. The problem is of course that debian sid also has a different libc ;-) Unfortunately, I don't have the time to completely debug this (e.g., one might want to know what files/streams are open by the hung process, etc) and I also have no familiarity with the openjdk internals. So, I 'm filing this in case anyone would be interested to look and will try to hack around this on the build until there is a proper solution. Thanks ** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309407] Re: Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT
I wonder if this is related to the various reported similar hangs associated with ATK being enabled -- Strange openjdk hang in FUTEX_WAIT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
Or, you could continue waiting patiently and (judging from history so far) maybe by 2012, eclipse packages will be in ubuntu Vintage Vinegar or something ;-) In 2012, one can expect Ubuntu Porky Piglet (LTS release) and Queer Quacker (normal release), following the naming policy. It's not quite time for a Vintage Vinegar release yet, though that name could be used as a general health indicator. :) Interesting observation :) Cheers, Pantelis -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
I 'd like to invite all subscribers to this bug to pkg-java- maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org We are trying to start an effort to get eclipse-3.4 and its ilk in shape for debian. From there merging it to ubuntu will be much easier. The big problem is we don't have anyone working full time on this, but I think we can still make it happen if a large number of people accept to contribute a small piece of the puzzle each. Fact: The number of subscribers is well more than 100, if even half of us contributed a small, trivial task we 'd all enjoy recent eclipse packages for a long time now, with room to spare for helping overholt, akurtakov and the other fedora guys upstream. in the linux-distros project. Being a newbie is *not* an excuse for not helping. We have lots of small, low hanging fruit tasks for people with skills in unix, branding stuff (drawing logos etc), packaging, Java, ant, eclipse, XML, project management etc. If on the other hand you believe you have no skills whatsoever (and no will to learn) one would wonder why do you care for an IDE anyway :-) So, if you are still interested, please come to the above mailing list and/or in #debian-java in OFTC, introduce yourself and present your skills and time constraints. Our team is mostly comprised of concerned users like you, we have at least one debian developer to help with uploading and such, but no gurus and no interest in flaming people (so no reason to be scared, honestly :-) Or, you could continue waiting patiently and (judging from history so far) maybe by 2012, eclipse packages will be in ubuntu Vintage Vinegar or something ;-) Cheers, Pantelis -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 108884] Re: [apport] unopkg.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in uno_threadpool_enter()
Everything working great now.No problem. 2007/10/22, Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Are you still having problems with unopkg.bin crashing on your system? Thanks, Chris Cheney ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Undecided Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Cheney (ccheney) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- [apport] unopkg.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in uno_threadpool_enter() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108884 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [apport] unopkg.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in uno_threadpool_enter() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88222] Re: [apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in module()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 88104 *** ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6546464/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6546465/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6546466/ProcStatus.txt -- [apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/88222 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88222] [apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in module()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 88104 *** Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier after reboot with feisty updates 26 feb ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Feb 27 01:37:05 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: update-notifier 0.56 ProcCmdline: python /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check'] SourcePackage: update-notifier Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check, line 6, in module import apt_pkg ImportError: No module named apt_pkg Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-8-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 13 05:21:37 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/88222 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86580] Re: [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
I can´t reproduce error now. My feisty updates daily and I only have problems with beryl now. -- [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://launchpad.net/bugs/86580 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86580] [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox occur just after complete boot system. ProblemType: Crash CrashCounter: 1 Date: Tue Feb 20 00:50:56 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin Package: firefox 2.0.0.1+1-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: firefox StacktraceTop: __kernel_vsyscall () raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 ?? () ?? () ?? () Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-8-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 13 05:21:37 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev scanner video ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://launchpad.net/bugs/86580 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86580] Re: [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486524/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486525/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486526/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486527/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486528/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486529/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6486530/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://launchpad.net/bugs/86580 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85173] [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets()
Public bug reported: official feisty repos. ProblemType: Crash Date: Wed Feb 14 19:57:28 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/beryl-settings InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: beryl-settings 0.1..2~0beryl1 ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/beryl-settings ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/beryl-settings'] SourcePackage: beryl-settings Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-8-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 13 05:21:37 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: beryl-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets() https://launchpad.net/bugs/85173 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85173] Re: [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6438772/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6438773/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6438774/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6438775/Traceback.txt -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets() https://launchpad.net/bugs/85173 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85206] [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets()
Public bug reported: trevino and feisty ProblemType: Crash Date: Wed Feb 14 22:23:37 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/beryl-settings InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: beryl-settings 0.2.0+svn20070213-r4034+3v1ubuntu0 ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/beryl-settings ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/beryl-settings'] SourcePackage: beryl-settings Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-8-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 13 05:21:37 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: beryl-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets() https://launchpad.net/bugs/85206 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85206] Re: [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6439085/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6439086/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6439087/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6439088/Traceback.txt -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with TypeError in MakeBackendWidgets() https://launchpad.net/bugs/85206 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84341] [apport] beryl-settings crashed with ImportError in module()
Public bug reported: using treviño svn ProblemType: Crash Date: Sat Feb 10 08:59:37 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/beryl-settings InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: beryl-settings 0.2.0+svn20070205-r3672+3v1ubuntu0 ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/beryl-settings ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/beryl-settings'] SourcePackage: beryl-settings Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/beryl-settings, line 22, in module import berylsettings ImportError: No module named berylsettings Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-6-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 31 20:55:57 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: beryl-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/84341 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84341] Re: [apport] beryl-settings crashed with ImportError in module()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6385573/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6385574/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6385575/ProcStatus.txt -- [apport] beryl-settings crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/84341 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83643] [apport] gnome-app-install crashed with ImportError in module()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-app-install Cant install gnome-app-install Problem with dependecies: software-properties-gtk (virtual pkg). ProblemType: Crash Date: Tue Feb 6 23:18:48 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-app-install InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: gnome-app-install 0.3.17 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gnome-app-install ProcCwd: /home/pacobaron ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/gnome-app-install'] SourcePackage: gnome-app-install Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/gnome-app-install, line 215, in module from AppInstall.AppInstall import AppInstall ImportError: No module named AppInstall.AppInstall Uname: Linux i6400 2.6.20-6-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 31 20:55:57 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] gnome-app-install crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/83643 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83643] Re: [apport] gnome-app-install crashed with ImportError in module()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6318579/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6318580/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6318581/ProcStatus.txt -- [apport] gnome-app-install crashed with ImportError in module() https://launchpad.net/bugs/83643 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34902] Re: Ralink Wireless USB/PCMCIA/PCI hangs PC
When I unplug dlink dwl-g122 or linksys wusb54 (rt2570 driver), keyboard and shutdown button stop works. Tested with latest CVS 20061103 ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Ralink Wireless USB/PCMCIA/PCI hangs PC https://launchpad.net/bugs/34902 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
