[Bug 994618] [NEW] flightgear fgfs-base package fails during 12.04 upgrade
Public bug reported: Continued messages about fgfs-base failing to install after upgrade to 12.04. Uninstalled flightgear completely and message persists. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: fgfs-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu May 3 15:52:22 2012 DuplicateSignature: Setting up fgfs-base (2.4.0-1) ... Moving /usr/share/games/FlightGear to /usr/share/games/flightgear... cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/games/FlightGear/*': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing fgfs-base (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) SourcePackage: fgfs-base Title: package fgfs-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-03 (0 days ago) ** Affects: fgfs-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994618 Title: flightgear fgfs-base package fails during 12.04 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fgfs-base/+bug/994618/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994618] Re: flightgear fgfs-base package fails during 12.04 upgrade
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994618 Title: flightgear fgfs-base package fails during 12.04 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fgfs-base/+bug/994618/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels
Same problem with my system when trying to upgrade Ubuntu 10.04 to 10.10. In my case, 'aptitude why blcr-dkms' returned that there was not reason to have blcr-dkms. To be sure, I ran 'sudo apt-get purge blcr- dkms' before attempting the upgrade without luck. Using the workaround suggested by Charles Opondo got me past that roadblock, however. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 Title: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642792] Re: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function
Me too. Print Screen works, Alt+Print Screen/SysRq does not. Ubuntu 10.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642792 Title: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364844] Re: network-manager-vpnc produces incorrect routing table
I am having a similar problem using an up-to-date Karmic Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit, same network=manager-vpnc as above (0.8~a~git.20091008t124012.f5b95a2-0ubuntu1): First, with NM-vpnc I get $ route -ne Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.4.11 10.112.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 193.15.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 10.112.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.128.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 $ ping google.com ^C Then using vpnc on the CLI $ sudo vpnc-connect VPNC started in background (pid: 10594)... $ route -ne Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.4.11 10.112.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH1500 0 0 eth0 193.15.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 10.112.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.128.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 $ ping google.com PING google.com (209.85.225.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from iy-in-f99.1e100.net (209.85.225.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=32.5 ms ^C --- google.com ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.517/32.517/32.517/0.000 ms The only difference I see is in the MSS value: 1500 when connected and working from vpnc-connect, 0 when using the NM-vpnc GUI. -- network-manager-vpnc produces incorrect routing table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367464] Re: Jaunty freezes randomly
In my case, disabling blur effects on compiz and/or upgrading the kernel helped. I haven't had this issue in several weeks now, but was having it a few times per week before. -- Jaunty freezes randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459294] Re: Install of Karmic Koala release candidate fails to boot
Ran into a similar problem with the beta just before RC came out. Now the RC CD will not boot so I cannot troubleshoot. -- Install of Karmic Koala release candidate fails to boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367464] Re: Jaunty freezes randomly
Having a similar issue on two different systems - one using NVIDIA and the other using Intel. I don't get any flashing caps lock. When the computer freezes, I am able to ssh to the machine from another computer and run commands. Applications running in the X window are frozen (eg, downloads carry the 'last modified' timestamp at the time of the freeze) and the only solution is the kill the session from the command line. Usually that does the trick - but everything is of course lost. Is there something useful I could pull from the command line when this happens? -- Jaunty freezes randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 385588] Re: Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps
I checked the the bug report you suggested: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308961 and included my information there. Seems to fit the problem - it's likely Nautilus is decreasing the font size from 7 to something like 5-6pt when using 33% zoom (though hard to tell at that size level) and that decrease is making it look so awful. On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:09 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: any news about this? did you sent the report upstream ? may you tell us the bug number there? thanks. -- Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385588] [NEW] Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Nautilus seems to be adding antialiasing to fonts that blurs the font when below 8pt. I have my system font set in GNOME as Tahoma 7pt, with full hinting and grayscale smoothing. This looks fine everywhere but in the text of nautilus folders, where it is blurry and nearly unreadable for some words when using 33% zoom level. Increasing the font size to 8pt seems to resolve the visibility problem, as does a zoom level of 50%, but Nautilus should be displaying fonts the same as the rest of the system. The attached screenshot shows this discrepancy. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.26.2-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385588] Re: Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps
** Attachment added: Screenshot-33%, 7pt.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729592/Screenshot-33%25%2C%207pt.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729593/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729594/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729595/ProcStatus.txt -- Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385588] Re: Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps
** Attachment added: Screenshot-33%, 8pt.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729606/Screenshot-33%25%2C%208pt.png -- Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385588] Re: Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps
** Attachment added: Screenshot-50%, 7pt.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27729620/Screenshot-50%25%2C%207pt.png -- Nautilus not rendering fonts the same as other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174 Sorry for my late reply. No, my chip is x3500. -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174 I agree with Nattgew. A noticable difference even when moving windows, for example. Very snappy without blur... slow and lagging with blur enabled. Gaussian is slower than bilinear (which doesn't provide much blur anyway). No garbage. ** Attachment added: gaussianblur.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26712075/gaussianblur.png -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353895] Re: Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit
I cannot install Jaunty on these computers until the full release and probably not until the first bugfix release. Sorry for my ignorance, but how would I browse an FTP folder with gvfs-ls? -- Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353895] [NEW] Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When trying to connect to an FTP server (Version: Mac OS X Server 10.3.9 003 - +GSSAPI) using 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10, Nautilus fails, telling me: Could not display ftp://server.host.ext/Folder. Error: Invalid reply Please select another viewer and try again. However, I am able to connect to this same server using 'ftp' at the CLI, gFTP and using a 32-bit laptop with Nautilus. My other 64-bit desktop has the same problem. I am able to connect to other FTP sites in both 64 and 32-bit versions, for example: ftp://ftp.arsc.edu ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353895] Re: Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24700647/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24700648/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24700650/ProcStatus.txt -- Cannot connect to FTP server from 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237818] Re: wine abc.com video strange graphics mode
Still an issue with FF3, Wine 1.15 and the latest Move Media Player. Also noteworthy is that (at least for me( this does not work on Virtualbox or VMware... possibly something to do with the video drivers? Do you have Intel video? -- wine abc.com video strange graphics mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308224] [NEW] add boolean options to search
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox More of a feature request, but it would be great to be able to use boolean operators in the search field. This is nice if, for example, you want to create a quick custom playlist with just a few artists or genres (eg: search for artistA OR artistB. ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- add boolean options to search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273326] Re: artifacts in Intrepid + nvidia binary drivers
I throw a me-too into the ring. I mostly see this problem on the right- most icons, but it affects the shiny switcher as well and cannot be resolved because mouse-overing doesn't create an effect for that applet. It is also left of my launcher bar (screenshot attached). ** Attachment added: reader4_Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19645540/reader4_Screenshot.png -- artifacts in Intrepid + nvidia binary drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246655] [NEW] Cannot create boolean search
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Nautilus should allow boolean searching - ie, term1 AND term2 or term1 OR term2, etc. Right now, it seems only to take the search terms as a single keyword string. This would be tremendously useful for saved searches as well. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jul 8 11:30:56 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.22.3-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic x86_64 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Cannot create boolean search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246655] Re: Cannot create boolean search
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15892741/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15892742/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15892743/ProcStatus.txt -- Cannot create boolean search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245281] Re: support composer id3 tags
Thank you. Unfortunate that the bug is almost 5 years old. -- support composer id3 tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245281] Re: support composer id3 tags
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15794496/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15794497/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15794498/ProcStatus.txt -- support composer id3 tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245281] [NEW] support composer id3 tags
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Rhythmbox does not support composer id3 tags - searching, sorting or organizing. These are critically important for classical music. Searching for a composer's name only retrieves those entries for which the name appears in the supported fields: name, artist, album, genre. This is almost completely useless. For example, if I search for Bach I get back about a dozen pieces of the 500 or so in my library. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jul 3 13:55:53 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu8 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic x86_64 ** Affects: rhythmbox Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: Triaged ** Tags: apport-bug -- support composer id3 tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222532] Re: Option to connect to secure webdav network locations missing in nautilus
Edit: Same behavior as fields_g but no folder is mounted to the desktop. -- Option to connect to secure webdav network locations missing in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222532] Re: Option to connect to secure webdav network locations missing in nautilus
Same here... same behavior as fields_g describes. -- Option to connect to secure webdav network locations missing in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
