[Bug 236324] Re: mozplugger doesn't swallow windows on x86_64
This happens to me too. I'm running 64-bit Hardy, mozplugger version is 1.10.1-2ubuntu2_amd64. -- mozplugger doesn't swallow windows on x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236324] Re: mozplugger doesn't swallow windows on x86_64
I don't know what the behaviour is supposed to be for other document types, but if RTFs and the like are supposed to be swallowed in an OpenOffice window (which would be my understanding from the config file), that doesn't happen. So I don't think this is specific to PDFs. -- mozplugger doesn't swallow windows on x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241744] [NEW] No support for "+" entries
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: adduser adduser doesn't have any support for "+" entries. Per Debian policy, programs (in this case the nis.deb) that aren't the primary responsibility of the config files (in this case /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, and /etc/group), are to be offered a program that modifies these entries. Adduser does these modifications, however, it doesn't support the "+" entries for NIS users. For the Debian how-to of NIS, see http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debian-howto/nis.html For the pertinent Debian Policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.4 The desired effect would be that one can use adduser to create an entry such as the following: /etc/passwd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +goodguy:/home/goodguy: -badguy:: +test::/usr/bin/zsh Currently, the adduser and useradd programs will fail stating that the username has bad characters in it and will even suggest that the preceeding "-" in name is a bad thing, even though it's required when running NIS w/ compat. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jun 20 12:51:24 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmmon nvidia Package: adduser 3.103ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: adduser Uname: Linux homestead.cso.atmel.com 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 02:46:46 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: adduser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- No support for "+" entries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241744] Re: No support for "+" entries
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15484961/Dependencies.txt -- No support for "+" entries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257437] [NEW] MP3 not showing in output format in Soundjuicer 2.22.0 preferences
Public bug reported: MP3 not showing in output format in Soundjuicer 2.22.0 preferences but does show in edit profiles. (I'm new to Ubuntu). The help function identifies MP3 as an option and I have downloaded the codec to enable the playing of MP3 in Rythmbox. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 12 22:35:06 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.22.1-0ubuntu2.8.04.2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- MP3 not showing in output format in Soundjuicer 2.22.0 preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257437] Re: MP3 not showing in output format in Soundjuicer 2.22.0 preferences
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16732941/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16732942/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16732943/ProcStatus.txt -- MP3 not showing in output format in Soundjuicer 2.22.0 preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190754] Re: Over-optimistic buffering in PulseAudio causes underruns (audible stuttering, pops)
Perhaps I'm just lucky today, but this problem doesn't seem to be affecting me anymore. -- Over-optimistic buffering in PulseAudio causes underruns (audible stuttering, pops) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190754] Re: Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy
Probably of no use to anybody, but this happens to me when playing in Quod Libet and alt-tabbing, etc. I'm have an Athlon64 3000+ (1.8GHz), 1GB of RAM and an Nvidia 6800 GS (512MB). While I don't know what graphics cards the laptops mentioned here have, it seems to me that everyone that has listed a graphics card seems to have an Nvidia card? Could this somehow be a problem with Nvidia's proprietary graphics drivers? (which of course would make it very difficult for Ubuntu to fix) -- Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190754] Re: Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy
I also just noticed that this bug doesn't seem to affect sound playing in Flash (for example, playing a song from a YouTube video or something). Is this significant or is this to be expected? -- Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188358] Re: No sound in VLC when playing a video with sound in Firefox + flash plugin
Yeah, same happens here when trying to use VLC with Quod Libet open. -- No sound in VLC when playing a video with sound in Firefox + flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190754] Re: Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy
I'm using the Adobe plugin... I don't know what it uses, but there's something in the back of my head telling me it's ALSA. Personally I haven't noticed any significant problems with multitasking so far with Hardy, though I've only been using it for a few days. Sound is definitely the biggest manifestation of this problem for me, if it is a general problem. -- Bad multitasking / responsiveness in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252901] Re: ubuntu-server install fails at grub-install stage when running in a KVM image
I'm actually getting this on the latest Intrepid installer, just to clarify. -- ubuntu-server install fails at grub-install stage when running in a KVM image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283263] Re: "malformed Release file" error when specifying --components option
I'd just like to add that I get this error too. -- "malformed Release file" error when specifying --components option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252901] Re: ubuntu-server install fails at grub-install stage when running in a KVM image
I'm also getting this problem. -- ubuntu-server install fails at grub-install stage when running in a KVM image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 976067] Re: Missing album art
As said, this shows album art for stuff that has been played, which isn't really a fix as far as I see since it should at the very least have the same functionality as the previous release. I don't know about other people but speaking personally, I don't make a point of playing every album in my collection after installation so only a fraction of the stuff listed in the music lens currently has the album art (after updating from proposed) so it looks messy and very unpolished seeing the odd bit of album art then loads of generic mimetype icons. Shouldn't this have been looked at more carefully when the decision was made to switch from banshee to rhythmbox? Of course it isn't the end of the world and it has no major impact on the system itself but the dash is a major part of unity and the music lens has been in there for a full release so users should expect it to work like it did, rather than regress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976067 Title: Missing album art To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/976067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 976067] Re: Missing album art
Yes, fair point and not really helpful, just that it is a lesson not being learned. But I am concerned that since this has been marked with "fix-released" then it will be left that way, even though it is only partially fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976067 Title: Missing album art To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/976067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
It is a workaround, not really a solution though... On 29 April 2012 09:32, Peter Kennes <930...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Have a look at this solution: > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1967822 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 > > Title: > Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only > on maximised apps ? > > Status in Ayatana Design: > Opinion > Status in Unity: > Opinion > Status in “unity” package in Ubuntu: > Opinion > > Bug description: > I was using dodge windows in unity mainly because it make the launcher > go out of the way on maximized apps (like Kdenlive who is benefiting a > lot from unity's capability of making the most space usable). > > But I was never hiding the launcher when I use "windowed" apps (like > firefox on the left and openoffice on the righ part of the screen) > because it helped me a lot switching with something else rapidly (like > thunderbird, pidgin, etc) > > What I think to be a good third behavior of the launcher is to hide > itself when one app or more are fullscreen and if they are not, being > always there. > > There is some corner cases like if one app is full screen and the > focused app is not. But I think this will not bring some crazy bugs > like dodging windows did in the past. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Alas, nobody from the design team has responded either here on the mailing lists about Dodge so it seems it is gone and forgotten as far as their concerned and all suggestions regarding it are now being ignored completely so it's pretty pointless adding anything else here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
nobody has responded recently I should have said. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873541] Re: misaligned close, minimize and maximize
The buttons have always been there and always looked out of place with the launcher always showing. The most sensible way of dealing with it would be to have the launcher reaching the top of the screen and the top panel beginning next to the launcher. Of course that raises the problem of things looking strange with the launcher set to autohide. Only thing I can think of for that is to have the buttons and top panel slide across with an animation as the launcher shows. I'm sure that would raise headaches in itself though. I say the best solution would be to have a large dash icon in the corner, in a "pizza" or quarter circle shape with the panel and launcher growing from it, which would also put more emphasis on the dash button itself. Of course I doubt this would ever happen so needs some sort of solution to deal with the current button placement. It does look terribly ugly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873541 Title: misaligned close, minimize and maximize To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/873541/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981406] Re: Bottom part of Shotwell window missing
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of problem" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406/+attachment/3063786/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-04-14%2007%3A57%3A13.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406 Title: Bottom part of Shotwell window missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/981406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981406] [NEW] Bottom part of Shotwell window missing
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 12.04 fully up-to-date. Shotwell version: 0.12.2-0ubuntu2, installed by default,not from PPA When opening Shotwell maximized, the bottom area of the window, just below the photo/preview area is missing. The status bar itself is not there which also extends the full width of the window so the photo information sidebar section is also cut off at the bottom. I have attached a screenshot highlighting the exact problem. This ONLY occurs when the window is maximized and when using compiz-based Unity "3D". If I un-maximize the window, it appears fully and normally. If I close the window then open it in it's un-maximized state, it opens normally. Also, if I launch Shotwell maximized in Unity "2D", it displays normally. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: shotwell 0.12.2-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 14 08:02:13 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120323) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: shotwell UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406 Title: Bottom part of Shotwell window missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/981406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733349] Re: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon
Although it is expected behaviour in a sense that it is what many people are used to, I'm not sure that really makes it the correct or natural behaviour. I am appreciating many changes in Unity because I find them natural, even if it is not how I am used to doing things. I see that as an improvement. I cannot think of a single case when using Unity that I have wanted to or needed to minimize via the launcher, even though it is what I am used to. The minimize button is on the left so wherever the window is, I don't see that it involves any more mouse movement than moving to the launcher, in fact probably less in most cases. If an expected behaviour is also the most natural, logical and obvious behaviour, then removing that behaviour may well cause confusion. If an expected behaviour is simply "expected" or "used to" then I'm not sure that is a good enough reason to include the behaviour. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733349 Title: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/733349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 962265] Re: Unity in 12.04 is impossible to use by a newbie because of the empty Dash at start
One fairly simple (I assume) solution would be to populate the "Home" lens with applications by default but as applications are used, they are re-ordered by recently used? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962265 Title: Unity in 12.04 is impossible to use by a newbie because of the empty Dash at start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/962265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754000] Re: 3 finger touch interferes with 3 finger click (middle click)
Well the workaround mentioned doesn't work for me I'm afraid. As for a full fix for natty, I don't get this fix in natty. I can use 3 finger middle-click there too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754000 Title: 3 finger touch interferes with 3 finger click (middle click) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/754000/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754000] Re: 3 finger touch interferes with 3 finger click (middle click)
I meant I don't get this problem in natty ^ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754000 Title: 3 finger touch interferes with 3 finger click (middle click) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/754000/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 840509] Re: touchpad triple-tap to middle-click stopped working in 11.10
There are other bugs related to this and all seem to be being completely ignored, marked as "won't fix" or marked as duplicates of other bugs. What exactly is going on? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840509 Title: touchpad triple-tap to middle-click stopped working in 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/840509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971783] Re: 3 touch taps and clicks are broken
The "workaround" of using synclient works to a point but is disabled again after resume from suspend -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971783 Title: 3 touch taps and clicks are broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/971783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990360] Re: global menubar frequently crashes in ubuntu 12.04
Same here. I have tried running Chromium/Google Chrome with UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 so it bypasses the menubar widget and then doesn't crash at all. Without the menuproxy flag, it crashes frequently on close again. Has also happened with other GTK apps (Cheese and Thunderbird) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to plasma-widget-menubar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990360 Title: global menubar frequently crashes in ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-menubar/+bug/990360/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 976067] Re: Missing album art
But it's not fixed. It still only shows artwork of PLAYED music. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976067 Title: Missing album art To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/976067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873541] Re: misaligned close, minimize and maximize
Since a patch was posted to the mailing list regarding this matter: https://lists.launchpad.net/unity-design/msg09055.html it seems nothing has actually moved forward. Is anything going to come of this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873541 Title: misaligned close, minimize and maximize To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/873541/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993321] [NEW] Deftlinux installer crash from Live USB image
Public bug reported: Installer crashed during system install of DeftLinux from an ISO image on a USB device setup from Unetbootin ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: ubiquity 2.8.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.287.1 Date: Wed May 2 15:31:19 2012 LiveMediaBuild: DEFT Linux 7 "Arcana Intellego" - Release i386 (20120113) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_IE.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric ubiquity-2.8.7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993321 Title: Deftlinux installer crash from Live USB image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/993321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993321] Re: Deftlinux installer crash from Live USB image
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993321 Title: Deftlinux installer crash from Live USB image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/993321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173673] Re: 13.04 - marvell driver bugs- surface pro w/ avastar 350N
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1165938 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1165938 Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173673 Title: 13.04 - marvell driver bugs- surface pro w/ avastar 350N To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1173673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
You'll need to compile the kernel yourself to apply that patch. All it does is comment out p2p and uap so they won't start up, so unfortunately even if it seems to solve the issue for us on the Surface it's not a real solution to the problem. I'll give it a try when I can and get back with the results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
I recompiled the mwifiex driver using the patch linked at http://askubuntu.com/a/262010/88546 (the one that comments out uap and p2p) and can confirm that it does indeed fix the problem. I had to reboot twice after copying over the new kernel objects - first shutdown after loading them had a hang, and first reboot following that they didn't work. After this everything seemed fine though. The process for doing this is fairly simple but will need to be done every time the kernel is updated (though I'm guessing there is some way around this). It would be great if someone with more knowledge could try and debug exactly why there is this error in the driver and suggest a fix that doesn't comment things out. I'll try and look around a bit myself, but don't have any real knowledge of drivers. I basically followed the guide here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/191538/how-do-i-compile-just-wireless- drivers-in-kernel. You will need to install the linux-source for your current kernel version as well. Make sure you've blacklisted mwifiex and mwifiex_usb before doing this. You can test if they are working by doing sudo insmod mwifiex.ko (once you've built it) and then sudo insmod mwifiex_usb.ko (these referring to the built versions). If everything looks good to go, copy all of the built .ko files into /lib/modules/kernel/your_cool_kernel_version/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex. I'll post a more detailed guide on one of the askubuntu threads and post a link to it later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1059928] Re: Lightdm [Kubuntu) not displaying user thumbnail photos
In my case I have 2 users. One has the thumbnail show on login screen and the other doesn't. Both users have a .face.icon in their home directories but only one is showing?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059928 Title: Lightdm [Kubuntu) not displaying user thumbnail photos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1059928/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84242]
Thanks for the link, Saurabh, but I don't think it would fix this particular issue as the user isn't brought to a Firefox error page, but one created by the proxy server. To fix this bug, the browser must know in advance that it isn't a proper URL (i.e., doesn't end in ".com" or any other TLD, etc.) and that it should go ahead and send it to the default search engine instead of the proxy server, just the way it does with multi-word searches. The problem seems to be that Firefox is just assuming that any single word typed into the Address Bar is a URL to be sent to the proxy, instead of checking it first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84242 Title: Firefox address bar search displays proxy error page for single word queries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/84242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1446081] Re: Incorrect scaling of launcher icons
This is the first thing I noticed on a fresh install of 15.04. Launcher icons are far too big by default yet they look awful at any other size. This was marked as confirmed nearly 3 months ago and still not fixed or even assigned? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446081 Title: Incorrect scaling of launcher icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1446081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1468922] [NEW] bluetooth not working
Public bug reported: built in bluetooth hasnt worked from lastest update ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: linux-image-3.19.0-21-generic 3.19.0-21.21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-21.21-generic 3.19.8 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: shane 1417 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: shane 1417 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity Date: Thu Jun 25 17:09:26 2015 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=7a1b1547-2fb4-4abf-853c-b0a7312d54dc InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-02-19 (126 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140722.2) MachineType: TOSHIBA Satellite C55D-B ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-21-generic root=UUID=36a3f366-98cd-4709-b998-d34f4fe124aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.19.0-21-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.19.0-21-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.143.1 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/06/2014 dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA dmi.bios.version: 1.30 dmi.board.asset.tag: * dmi.board.name: ZBWAE dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA dmi.board.version: 1.00 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: * dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.30:bd06/06/2014:svnTOSHIBA:pnSatelliteC55D-B:pvrPSCN4U-00T019:rvnTOSHIBA:rnZBWAE:rvr1.00:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct10:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: Satellite C55D-B dmi.product.version: PSCN4U-00T019 dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468922 Title: bluetooth not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1468922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1468922] Re: bluetooth not working
Total crash of my laptop this kernel did not work On Jun 26, 2015 11:25 AM, "Joseph Salisbury" wrote: > Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer > to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest > v3.19 kernel[0]. > > If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following > tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'. > > If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag: > 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'. > > If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not > boot, please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'. > Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as > "Confirmed". > > > Thanks in advance. > > [0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.1-unstable/ > > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Medium > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Status: Confirmed => Incomplete > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468922 > > Title: > bluetooth not working > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > built in bluetooth hasnt worked from lastest update > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 > Package: linux-image-3.19.0-21-generic 3.19.0-21.21 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-21.21-generic 3.19.8 > Uname: Linux 3.19.0-21-generic x86_64 > NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx > ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.1 > Architecture: amd64 > AudioDevicesInUse: >USERPID ACCESS COMMAND >/dev/snd/controlC1: shane 1417 F pulseaudio >/dev/snd/controlC0: shane 1417 F pulseaudio > CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity > Date: Thu Jun 25 17:09:26 2015 > HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=7a1b1547-2fb4-4abf-853c-b0a7312d54dc > InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-02-19 (126 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 > (20140722.2) > MachineType: TOSHIBA Satellite C55D-B > ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-21-generic > root=UUID=36a3f366-98cd-4709-b998-d34f4fe124aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > RelatedPackageVersions: >linux-restricted-modules-3.19.0-21-generic N/A >linux-backports-modules-3.19.0-21-generic N/A >linux-firmware 1.143.1 > RfKill: >0: phy0: Wireless LAN > Soft blocked: no > Hard blocked: no > SourcePackage: linux > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > dmi.bios.date: 06/06/2014 > dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA > dmi.bios.version: 1.30 > dmi.board.asset.tag: * > dmi.board.name: ZBWAE > dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA > dmi.board.version: 1.00 > dmi.chassis.asset.tag: * > dmi.chassis.type: 10 > dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.30:bd06/06/2014:svnTOSHIBA:pnSatelliteC55D-B:pvrPSCN4U-00T019:rvnTOSHIBA:rnZBWAE:rvr1.00:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct10:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: > dmi.product.name: Satellite C55D-B > dmi.product.version: PSCN4U-00T019 > dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1468922/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468922 Title: bluetooth not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1468922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498011] Re: (SMB) share not remounted when resuming
I'm getting this same bug on 13.10 64-bit with Nautilus 3.8.2. Whenever I click on the icon for the share, it pulls up gedit with the same error that others have reported above. When I hit Ctrl-L and type in the name of the share, it works fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498011 Title: (SMB) share not remounted when resuming To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/498011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1299499] Re: kwin crashes on desktop startup with wobbly windows enabled
Same here,20 desktop effects not working on " Intel Ironlake Mobile " .Look like it's gone to high importance so may see a fix very soon hopefully. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299499 Title: kwin crashes on desktop startup with wobbly windows enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1299499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
Well unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a perfect fix! After a day of it working fine linux is now crashing shortly after bootup with some debug message related to the wireless. I haven't had time to investigate yet. If you go ahead and try things out I would suggest not overwriting the old drivers with the new ones and instead loading them manually with insmod as needed. This weekend or maybe earlier I'll try and put some time into actually trying to debug this a bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1177551] [NEW] kio-tmp causes dolphin slowness
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 13.04 Release:13.04 $ apt-cache policy kio-mtp kio-mtp: Installed: 0+git20130315-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0+git20130315-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0+git20130315-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status What I expected to happen: I expect dolphin to open quickly and right-click menu to open instantly. What happens instead: Dolphin takes several seconds to start and right-click menu takes a further few seconds to open. Using apt-get to remove kio-mtp results in dolphin opening instantly and right-click menu opening instantly. Re-installing the kio-mtp package brings back the slow start and right-click menu. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: kio-mtp 0+git20130315-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.30-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue May 7 21:30:31 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-01 (5 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: kio-mtp UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: kio-mtp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1177551 Title: kio-tmp causes dolphin slowness To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kio-mtp/+bug/1177551/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981406] Re: Bottom part of maximized windows missing sometimes
I'm no longer using ubuntu (and so not shotwell either) but I gave ubuntu 13.04 a test run and the shotwell window seems to be behaving as it should with no missing parts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406 Title: Bottom part of maximized windows missing sometimes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/981406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
@Danny: My best guess is that no one is working on the bug. I've looked at it a little myself but it is really going to take someone familiar with Marvel/Linux wifi to sort this out. The patch that is linked is not a good solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941219] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn Bug, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Shane Shane Piper I.T Manager / Web Designer / Systems Administrator at Mayway UK Company Limited Croydon, United Kingdom Confirm that you know Shane Piper: https://www.linkedin.com/e/fzmzdo-hjle1h4s-6g/isd/15293892306/avmArfDw/?hs=false&tok=29XkfcuUo2F5Q1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/fzmzdo-hjle1h4s-6g/kwteIoxHK0q6cvKqbfrJrxlH7W8Au4yH_NPYrzs/goo/941219%40bugs%2Elaunchpad%2Enet/20061/I5092405616_1/?hs=false&tok=3me2F-vgs2F5Q1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941219 Title: [Acer Aspire 8930G] Speaker Sound does not mute when Headphones are connected. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Missing Auto-Mute Mode in alsamixer. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/941219/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: 1286:2044 [Microsoft Surface Pro] Marvell 88W8797 wifi does not work
So I've noticed that the patch that was applied via Bug #1212720 is the same one that I tried compiling myself a while back. While it seems to sort of work, I'm still getting problems connecting to networks, especially secure networks. Sometimes I can connect, sometimes I can't, and sometimes I'll have to restart because the wifi will completely lock up. Anyone else getting this issue? I'm using the 3.11 kernel Brandon has linked on his guide right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: 1286:2044 [Microsoft Surface Pro] Marvell 88W8797 wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1348810] [NEW] video crashes
Public bug reported: computer lock up ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-32.57-generic 3.13.11.4 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: "" .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 304.117 Tue Nov 26 21:25:36 PST 2013 GCC version: gcc version 4.8.2 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Fri Jul 25 15:57:53 2014 DistUpgraded: 2014-07-21 12:04:04,143 DEBUG enabling apt cron job DistroCodename: trusty DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400 GS] [10de:0422] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Device [1682:2312] InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-20 (520 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: MSI MS-7252 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-32-generic root=UUID=b111b39c-d99f-4a11-83b2-5065edcbdf98 ro SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-07-21 (4 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 09/06/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: MS-7252 dmi.bios.version: V5.6 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: MS-7252 dmi.board.vendor: MSI dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnMS-7252:bvrV5.6:bd09/06/2007:svnMSI:pnMS-7252:pvr1.0:rvnMSI:rnMS-7252:rvr1.0:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: MS-7252 dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: MSI version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.11.2+14.04.20140714-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.52-1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.1.3-0ubuntu0.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.1.3-0ubuntu0.1 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.15.1-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.8.2-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.3.0-1ubuntu3.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.910-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.10-1ubuntu2 xserver.bootTime: Fri Jul 25 07:44:36 2014 xserver.configfile: default xserver.devices: inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 6 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 7 inputMicrosoft Natural® Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 KEYBOARD, id 8 inputMicrosoft Natural® Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 KEYBOARD, id 9 inputMicrosoft Microsoft Optical Mouse with Tilt Wheel MOUSE, id 10 xserver.errors: open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log xserver.outputs: xserver.version: 2:1.15.1-0ubuntu2 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348810 Title: video crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1348810/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324252] Re:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 262451 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262451 http://bereniceargentina.com.ar/net.work.php?ID=koqisoqdavysj -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324252 Title: I try to run Synaptic Package Manager, and it gives the following error: "E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. E: _cache->open() failed. Please report. " I am now unable to access Synaptic. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/324252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981406] Re: Bottom part of Shotwell window missing
And the fact it only happens in unity 3D and not 2D would suggest the same. It is quite disappointing to still see this issue in the default photo app 2 months after release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406 Title: Bottom part of Shotwell window missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/981406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891575] Re: Launcher - launcher should have blurred background all the time
It says fix released in ayatana-design. What does this mean exactly? Does it mean this WILL be implemented in Unity and if so, when would such a fix trickle into an actual ubuntu release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891575 Title: Launcher - launcher should have blurred background all the time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/891575/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] [NEW] Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
Public bug reported: The wifi/bluetooth chip that the MS Surface Pro uses, a Marvell avastar 88W8797, does not work properly under Ubuntu 12.10 or 13.04. On 13.04, it will be reported three times in the network manager and any attempt to connect to any network will fail, regardless of the settings of the network. Additionally attempting to connect to any of the three listed connections will cause the system to hang on shutdown, as well as any attempt to read the state of the network. Some of the errors during shutdown that I have noticed: Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c24 tx timeout Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c52 tx timeout A workaround has been posted for 12.10, but does not seem to work properly under 13.04: http://askubuntu.com/questions/257600/marvells- wireless-driver-not-recognized. The workaround is not an ideal way of interfacing with wifi networks. Relavent discussions that may be of some use: http://askubuntu.com/questions/265644/dual-boot-surface-pro-with-ubuntu, https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=158490 Here is the output of iwconfig: p2p0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on uap0 IEEE 802.11abgn Mode:Master Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:on mlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on Here is the output of iwlist scan: http://pastie.org/private/rtt1qotgee7k3ciqhborqq Here is the output of lsb_release: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) Release:13.04 Codename: raring Here is the output of lshw -C network: *-network description: Wireless interface physical id: 1 bus info: firewire@3 logical name: p2p0 serial: 60:45:bd:e1:65:94 capabilities: ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes driver=usb driverversion=3.8.0-16-generic firmware=N/A link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11abgn Here is the output of modinfo mwifiex_usb: filename: /lib/modules/3.8.0-16-generic/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/mwifiex_usb.ko firmware: mrvl/usb8797_uapsta.bin license:GPL v2 version:1.0 description:Marvell WiFi-Ex USB Driver version1.0 author: Marvell International Ltd. srcversion: 73D8AC7543BD1766913AD58 alias: usb:v1286p2044d*dc*dsc*dp*icFFiscFFipFFin* alias: usb:v1286p2043d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* depends:mwifiex intree: Y vermagic: 3.8.0-16-generic SMP mod_unload modversions Here is the output of ls /lib/firmware/mrvl: total 1656 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 28 13:01 ./ drwxr-xr-x 57 root root 4096 Apr 4 22:22 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 259172 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2616 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688_helper.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447384 Mar 28 13:01 sd8787_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 458108 Mar 28 13:01 sd8797_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 508372 Mar 28 13:01 usb8797_uapsta.bin Here is the contents of /etc/network/interfaces: # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback Here is the output of uname -a: Linux shane-surface-ubuntu 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Here is the output of lsusb: Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 003 Device 003: ID 1286:2044 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Bus 004 Device 002: ID 0bda:0307 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 045e:0795 Microsoft Corp. Bus 002 Device 003: ID 045e:079c Microsoft Corp. Bus 002 Device 004: ID 03eb:8209 Atmel Corp. Bus 002 Device 005: ID 045e:0794 Microsoft Corp. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Marvell 88W8797 wifi does not
[Bug 1165938] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633206/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: The wifi/bluetooth chip that the MS Surface Pro uses, a Marvell avastar 88W8797, does not work properly under Ubuntu 12.10 or 13.04. On 13.04, it will be reported three times in the network manager and any attempt to connect to any network will fail, regardless of the settings of the network. Additionally attempting to connect to any of the three listed connections will cause the system to hang on shutdown, as well as any attempt to read the state of the network. Some of the errors during shutdown that I have noticed: Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c24 tx timeout Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c52 tx timeout A workaround has been posted for 12.10, but does not seem to work properly under 13.04: http://askubuntu.com/questions/257600/marvells- wireless-driver-not-recognized. The workaround is not an ideal way of interfacing with wifi networks. Relavent discussions that may be of some use: http://askubuntu.com/questions/265644/dual-boot-surface-pro-with-ubuntu, https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=158490 Here is the output of iwconfig: p2p0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on uap0 IEEE 802.11abgn Mode:Master Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:on mlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on Here is the output of iwlist scan: http://pastie.org/private/rtt1qotgee7k3ciqhborqq Here is the output of lsb_release: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) Release: 13.04 Codename: raring Here is the output of lshw -C network: *-network description: Wireless interface physical id: 1 bus info: firewire@3 logical name: p2p0 serial: 60:45:bd:e1:65:94 capabilities: ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes driver=usb driverversion=3.8.0-16-generic firmware=N/A link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11abgn Here is the output of modinfo mwifiex_usb: filename: /lib/modules/3.8.0-16-generic/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/mwifiex_usb.ko firmware: mrvl/usb8797_uapsta.bin license:GPL v2 version:1.0 description:Marvell WiFi-Ex USB Driver version1.0 author: Marvell International Ltd. srcversion: 73D8AC7543BD1766913AD58 alias: usb:v1286p2044d*dc*dsc*dp*icFFiscFFipFFin* alias: usb:v1286p2043d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* depends:mwifiex intree: Y vermagic: 3.8.0-16-generic SMP mod_unload modversions Here is the output of ls /lib/firmware/mrvl: total 1656 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 28 13:01 ./ drwxr-xr-x 57 root root 4096 Apr 4 22:22 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 259172 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2616 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688_helper.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447384 Mar 28 13:01 sd8787_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 458108 Mar 28 13:01 sd8797_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 508372 Mar 28 13:01 usb8797_uapsta.bin Here is the contents of /etc/network/interfaces: # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback Here is the output of uname -a: Linux shane-surface-ubuntu 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Here is the output of lsusb: Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 003 Device 003: ID 1286:2044 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Bus 004 Device 002: ID 0bda:0307 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID
[Bug 1165938] CRDA.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633207/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633208/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] IwConfig.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633209/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633210/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633211/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633212/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633213/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633214/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] RfKill.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633215/+files/RfKill.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633216/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633217/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938/+attachment/3633218/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165938 Title: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1165938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165938] Re: Marvell 88W8797 (Surface Pro) wifi does not work
Tested on 3.9 rc6 and issue still exists. The apport-collect information is not from the upstream kernel - it doesn't seem to want to overwrite that information. ** Description changed: The wifi/bluetooth chip that the MS Surface Pro uses, a Marvell avastar 88W8797, does not work properly under Ubuntu 12.10 or 13.04. On 13.04, it will be reported three times in the network manager and any attempt to connect to any network will fail, regardless of the settings of the network. Additionally attempting to connect to any of the three listed connections will cause the system to hang on shutdown, as well as any attempt to read the state of the network. Some of the errors during shutdown that I have noticed: Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c24 tx timeout Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x0c52 tx timeout A workaround has been posted for 12.10, but does not seem to work properly under 13.04: http://askubuntu.com/questions/257600/marvells- wireless-driver-not-recognized. The workaround is not an ideal way of interfacing with wifi networks. Relavent discussions that may be of some use: http://askubuntu.com/questions/265644/dual-boot-surface-pro-with-ubuntu, https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=158490 Here is the output of iwconfig: p2p0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on uap0 IEEE 802.11abgn Mode:Master Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:on mlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on Here is the output of iwlist scan: http://pastie.org/private/rtt1qotgee7k3ciqhborqq Here is the output of lsb_release: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) Release: 13.04 Codename: raring Here is the output of lshw -C network: *-network description: Wireless interface physical id: 1 bus info: firewire@3 logical name: p2p0 serial: 60:45:bd:e1:65:94 capabilities: ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes driver=usb driverversion=3.8.0-16-generic firmware=N/A link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11abgn Here is the output of modinfo mwifiex_usb: filename: /lib/modules/3.8.0-16-generic/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/mwifiex_usb.ko firmware: mrvl/usb8797_uapsta.bin license:GPL v2 version:1.0 description:Marvell WiFi-Ex USB Driver version1.0 author: Marvell International Ltd. srcversion: 73D8AC7543BD1766913AD58 alias: usb:v1286p2044d*dc*dsc*dp*icFFiscFFipFFin* alias: usb:v1286p2043d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* depends:mwifiex intree: Y vermagic: 3.8.0-16-generic SMP mod_unload modversions Here is the output of ls /lib/firmware/mrvl: total 1656 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 28 13:01 ./ drwxr-xr-x 57 root root 4096 Apr 4 22:22 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 259172 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2616 Mar 28 13:01 sd8688_helper.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447384 Mar 28 13:01 sd8787_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 458108 Mar 28 13:01 sd8797_uapsta.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 508372 Mar 28 13:01 usb8797_uapsta.bin Here is the contents of /etc/network/interfaces: # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback Here is the output of uname -a: Linux shane-surface-ubuntu 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Here is the output of lsusb: Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 003 Device 003: ID 1286:2044 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Bus 004 Device 002: ID 0bda:0307 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
[Bug 324252] Re:Hello!
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 262451 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262451 The chance to improve your life was given to you! http://mizaat.com/data/home.php?showtopic=byhyrunaqjqy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324252 Title: I try to run Synaptic Package Manager, and it gives the following error: "E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. E: _cache->open() failed. Please report. " I am now unable to access Synaptic. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/324252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 976067] Re: Missing album art
As I said before, why is this marked as fixed released when it still isn't fixed even in the latest 12.10 beta? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976067 Title: Missing album art To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/976067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044150] [NEW] no 5.1 surround sound
Public bug reported: i have no 5.1 surround sound,i have also google this heaps and also tried many of the fixes with no luck.also i have had this problem before and have been able to fix by changing a few lines in /etc/pulse/daemon.conf but i now have a new gigabyte m/b model h61ma- d2v,also i have been using linux for about 5 years but i ended up in desperation loading xp pro to another hardrive to see if i could get 5.1 surround to ensure both speakers and m/board were not faulty and it worked fine..any help would be much appreciated ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC887-VD Analog [ALC887-VD Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: sloath 1708 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: sloath 1708 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0c: sloath 1708 F...m pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'PCH'/'HDA Intel PCH at 0xf7d0 irq 44' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC887-VD' Components : 'HDA:10ec0887,1458a002,00100302' Controls : 34 Simple ctrls : 18 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'U0x46d0x8d9'/'USB Device 0x46d:0x8d9 at usb-:00:1a.0-1.2, full speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB046d:08d9' Controls : 3 Simple ctrls : 2 CheckboxSubmission: 5bd45b03de22d190c5ce995850d4c3f5 CheckboxSystem: fcdd340185c9db7431dce520c1b1ae62 Date: Fri Aug 31 10:34:45 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_AU:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH failed Symptom_Card: QuickCam IM/Connect - USB Device 0x46d:0x8d9 Symptom_Type: Only some of outputs are working Title: [HDA-Intel - HDA Intel PCH, playback] Playback problem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/19/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: F1 dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: H61MA-D2V dmi.board.vendor: INTEL Corporation dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Tecohnology Co., Ltd. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrF1:bd12/19/2011:svnGigabyteTecohnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnH61MA-D2V:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnINTELCorporation:rnH61MA-D2V:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTecohnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: H61MA-D2V dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Tecohnology Co., Ltd. ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044150 Title: no 5.1 surround sound To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1044150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044150] Re: no 5.1 surround sound
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044150 Title: no 5.1 surround sound To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1044150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044150] Re: no 5.1 surround sound
,thanks for speedy reply Ramond,but where do i make these changes?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044150 Title: no 5.1 surround sound To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1044150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058809] [NEW] Cannot integrate webapps
Public bug reported: Most of the listed webapp sites aren't working for me. Some give the notification that they want to integrate into unity (lastfm gmail, grooveshark and a few other). Upon clicking install, I get a password prompt to install but nothing happens. No icon is added to the launcher and nothing is integrated but they are listed as installed in synaptic. Some give the notification and do appear to install (BBC News, OMGubuntu!), they add an icon to the launcher but after closing firefox, the launcher icon disappears and intermittently returns. The rest give no notification offering integration at all (Youtube, facebook, google calendar). I have tested on a fully updated beta 1 install which has been used daily and on a fresh beta 2 install with identical results. I have also tested on chromium installed from the default repo, again with identical results. Description:Ubuntu quantal (development branch) Release:12.10 unity-webapps-common: Installed: 2.4.6-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 2.4.6-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 2.4.6-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: unity-webapps-common 2.4.6-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.5.3-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Sep 29 23:23:54 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha amd64 (20120903.4) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: webapps-applications UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: webapps-applications (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058809 Title: Cannot integrate webapps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webapps-applications/+bug/1058809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058809] Re: Cannot integrate webapps
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058809 Title: Cannot integrate webapps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webapps-applications/+bug/1058809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 837401] Re: Dash: No blur option should use an opaque or translucent lens
Surely all this needs is a much darker tint? I would prefer opaque but at least a darker tint would be useable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837401 Title: Dash: No blur option should use an opaque or translucent lens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/837401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754000] Re: Running Unity disables Xorg's 3-finger click support (middle click)
Does this fix only affect the Mac problem with CLICKABLE touchpads or should this work with 3 finger TAPS also? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754000 Title: Running Unity disables Xorg's 3-finger click support (middle click) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/754000/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947587] Re: xfstt crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947587 Title: xfstt crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfstt/+bug/947587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
@ Mark Although the comments on the mailing list do make sense, most of the decision seems based on initial exposure to dodge windows and although it could well be confusing to some people could this whole situation have been solved by having big shiny visual clues on screen the first time such things are encountered? Just like Android 4? Adds a bit of bling-bling to impress new users at the same time :) I am another of those who prefer to have dodge windows, mainly because I find autohide fiddly with a touchpad and needs too much pressure by default. I find I mostly use the launcher when the desktop is empty so hence the usefulness of dodge. I cannot use the launcher in always show mode simply because I mostly use maximized windows and I just cannot take my eyes off the ugly top left corner of the screen where everything meets. The way the menubar overhangs the window at the top of the launcher. Just ugly and weird. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
@ zzecool Yes I know I can change the pressure but I shouldn't really have to install an app AND change an option to do it. When running 11.10, I have no such pressure problems when using dodge and the launcher was off-screen. The removal of dodge itself is not really that big an issue, it's more of an annoyance and inconvenience that I am FORCED to change a preference without being able to change it back. The problem for me is the whole pressure/reveal behaviour but that's another matter for another time really. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Even with dodge windows gone, I still think the original question regarding hiding the launcher for maximized window is valid. As I said in a previous statement, a simple visual cue would solve any confusion. So a new user logs in to their desktop, opens a few apps, clicks on the dash etc... So far so good. A user then maximizes and window and *poof* where's the launcher gone? Confused! So how about a new user logs in to their desktop, opens a few apps, clicks on the dash etc... So far so good. A user then maximizes a window and before the launcher vanishes a small box pops up with an arrow pointing to the launcher, maybe in the style of the quicklist menus, with a simple message: "When you maximize a an application, the launcher will move out of the way for you, giving you more space to work". Obviously the wording could be much improved but it would let the new user know exactly what is happening the first time they see it, without changing the behaviour people have become used to. Aren't those who were new users with 11.10 going to be confused or annoyed when they upgrade to the new version and find behaviour they were used to has suddenly vanished and they don't know why? I'm sure they aren't going to think of searching mailing lists for the reason and so there will be another wave of complaints and discussions on this issue which is likely to continue for some time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Dodge windows is gone, yes but this report is about the possibility of autohiding the launcher for maximized windows only. That surely wouldn't need the return of dodge and all it's code? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
"It would trigger the very experience which tested worst for dodge." Which as I have said a couple of times, could be completely avoided with a simple visual message the first time it happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
@ Mark If you get chance to read back over some of the recent comments, could you please give your views on the specific idea of a visual message to explain where the launcher has gone and whether such an approach has been tested? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Without wanting to sound inflammatory (it certainly isn't meant to), I would be interested to know why the feedback of a handful of individuals who are unfamiliar with unity seems more valuable than that of the 90+ people who have marked themselves affected by this bug (as some people clearly consider it)? I am not devaluing the usefulness of such testing but I would assume many, if not all the people who have contributed to this bug have been using unity for at least one release cycle. These are people for whom the dodge behaviour was also new to them but they don't seem to have been confused by it? As I have mentioned before, plenty of users who were new last term are going to be confused by the removal of a feature they have become used to. Personally, I can use either behaviour. I prefer dodge/autohide for maximized windows but I CAN live without it. Others clearly feel much more strongly on the subject. I would guess the 90+ people affected so far will be over 100 within a few days and that seems like an awful lot of people to ignore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948518] Re: chromium-browser crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 921300 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921300 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948518 Title: chromium-browser crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/948518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
On point 3, I don't think any added complexities would help the matter. Just a simple, no compromise rule. If the window isn't fully maximized, then the launcher follows the behaviour as set in the options and that includes tiling or anything else. Of course even that would still require a third user option or even a checkbox, "Hide when maximized" next to the Always show option. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
The "rationale" is that the behaviour causes confusion. After several proposals that could completely eliminate such confusion, the rationale doesn't seem very rational. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950415] [NEW] Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release:12.04 Chromium version: 17.0.963.66~r124982-0ubuntu1 Expected behaviour: I click on the chromium browser launcher icon, the icon pulsates and chromium browser starts up shortly afterwards. What happens instead: I click on the chromium browser launcher icon, the icon pulsates but chromium browser does not start. I click on the launcher icon a second time (after waiting for the icon to stop pulsating) and chromium browser still does not start. I click on the launcher icon a third time and chromium browser starts up shortly afterwards. Additional information: Chromium occasionally starts up first time but this happens maybe 1 in 8-10 attempts. If chromium fails to launch with the first attempt, it sometimes starts up the second time but usually it takes a third attempt. It never takes more than three attempts before finally starting. If I try starting from a terminal, chromium usually starts normally but will occasionally fail to start, with "Segmentation fault" the only output. This happens in both Unity and Unity 2D. This problem also occurs if using chromium browser from the chromium-daily PPA. The same versions of chromium browser launch normally in Kubuntu/KDE, not tested in other environments. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: chromium-browser 18.0.997.0~svn20120105r116462-0ubuntu1~ucd1 [origin: LP-PPA-chromium-daily] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Thu Mar 8 23:39:45 2012 Desktop-Session: DESKTOP_SESSION = ubuntu-2d XDG_CONFIG_DIRS = /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntu-2d:/etc/xdg XDG_DATA_DIRS = /usr/share/ubuntu-2d:/usr/share/gnome:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/ Env: MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH = None LD_LIBRARY_PATH = None InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta amd64 (20120301) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser ThirdParty: True UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS="" ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950415 Title: Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/950415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950415] Re: Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950415 Title: Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/950415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950415] Re: Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher
Should point out that the output automatically added by ubuntu-bug was sent after upgrading from the chromium-daily PPA so the information provided is from that version, not the one in the ubuntu repositories. If you need me to send a report again from the version in the repos I can do that but the behaviour is the same regardless of version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950415 Title: Chromium Browser takes several attempts to start from launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/950415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
It just seems natural to me that if the desktop is empty, then you may well be wanting to launch an app or do some work of some kind so it makes perfect sense for the launcher to be there, ready and waiting. Then when you have launched your app, it moves out of the way so you can fully concentrate and maximize the screen space. The autohide behaviour at the moment seems pretty iffy and unpredictable. I find the launcher takes more effort to show than it should when I WANT it to show, yet when I overshoot the back button in chromium and nudge the edge of the screen, the launcher shows instantly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 967332] Re: update-software-center-agent crashed with OSError in rmtree(): [Errno 39] Directory not empty: '/home/username/.cache/software-center/software-center-agent.db'
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967332 Title: update-software-center-agent crashed with OSError in rmtree(): [Errno 39] Directory not empty: '/home/username/.cache/software-center /software-center-agent.db' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/967332/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Seems to me there are currently two burning issues amongst users, this and the minimize from launcher issue. In both cases it has driven the community to come up with their own solutions. Does this not give a case for some sort of "unity-addons" (or extras or extensions or something) package? As I have said before, when oblivious 11.10 users upgrade and find the dodge behaviour not only gone but removed altogether, there is going to be more uproar. The more users are ignored, the more they are going to be forced into finding other ways of doing things. This may lead to more 3rd party repos or PPA's which may well include badly coded or buggy workarounds which are then going to end up here on launchpad as bug reports. Both the current hide for maximized windows and minimize from launcher workarounds would require a few lines of code, is there really such a lack of resources in this team that this couldn't be worked into unity or as an extras package if you really want to keep unity that lean? After all, the HUD has made it from nothing to it's current state in just a few months and I'm sure that is more complex than hide on maximized? Either way, I have completely lost patience with ubuntu. I hear so much a bout "user testing" deciding things yet almost 200 users here alone are being completely ignored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 929219] Re: chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in __nscd_get_mapping()
I rebooted after applying all latest Precise (beta) updates. Chromium as a Startup Application suffered this fault. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929219 Title: chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in __nscd_get_mapping() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eglibc/+bug/929219/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873482] Re: elantech: Touchpad always reports 3 finger tap as 1 finger tap
For Heavens sake! I struggled with this issue on another laptop for so long and eventually settled for the synclient workaround. I switched to a new laptop a few days which has an elantech touchpad and synclient workaround was still working and then suddenly stopped. Just please tell me, is three finger tap ever going to actually PROPERLY work in unity or should I just switch back to another distro that CAN seem to manage it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873482 Title: elantech: Touchpad always reports 3 finger tap as 1 finger tap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/873482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894112] Re: Precise Pangolin - Please include ubuntuforums.org in the slideshow
Although something like askubuntu may possibly be better as a support portal, particularly for new users, including ubuntuforums would push the community side of ubuntu more and get them more involved in the "world" of ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894112 Title: Precise Pangolin - Please include ubuntuforums.org in the slideshow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/+bug/894112/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Regarding the subject matter of this bug report, an ubuntu forums member has been working on the following script which enables hiding for MAXIMIZED windows only: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11761683&postcount=15 I have been using this script for the past few days and it works wonderfully and I prefer it to the full-on dodge behaviour. If this is possible with such a small and pretty simple simple, would it really require much code to implement in unity? Seems a good compromise to me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955193] Re: Menu bar - add option for the global menu to make it always visible
Didn't "The Dictator" already say in the mailing lists that this option will be available "in due course"? Incidentally, I'm not sure terms such as "dictator" should be used in official streams such as this. Regardless of personal opinions I don't think such labels are constructive or helpful, even if done in the hope of hitting a nerve/annoying certain people into action (in fact I would tend to say it may have the opposite affect with some people). Probably best saved for the forums, or OMG Ubuntu! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955193 Title: Menu bar - add option for the global menu to make it always visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/955193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
