Re: [Bug 1768230] Re: Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning.
I should add that my system was an upgrade, using LVM with EXT4. I'm honestly debating about backing up, blowing it up and installing fresh without LVM, I'm not sure I see the advantage to using it. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:31 AM Marc Pignat <1768...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This bug seems wrongly linked to ubiquity since updating the system can > also lead to the bug. Can someone find a better package to link this bug > to? the kernel? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768230 > > Title: > Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to > device scanning. > > Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > After choosing "Erase disk and install ubuntu" + "Use LVM with the new > Ubuntu installation", the > system is very slow to reboot. > > It shows the message : "WARNING:Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling > back to device scanning.", > then waits 32 seconds, then continues as it should. > > I think this is a ubiquity bug, since the d-i based installer is not > affected. >- ubuntu-18.04-desktop-amd64.iso > (a55353d837cbf7bc006cf49eeff05ae5044e757498e30643a9199b9a25bc9a34) : > affected >- xubuntu-18.04-desktop-amd64.iso > (7c24318d3b1de1efd584b5aea034ce1aafd2d0f06c59812d989a5fc95bf947e3) : > affected >- ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso > (a7f5c7b0cdd0e9560d78f1e47660e066353bb8a79eb78d1fc3f4ea62a07e6cbc) : not > affected > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1768230/+subscriptions > -- Steve Lougheed sloughee...@gmail.com BCS Junior High Computer Science 905-843-3771 This email, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by reply email or by telephone, delete this email and destroy any copies. Thank-you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768230 Title: Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1768230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1768230] Re: Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning.
Happens to my install that is on older dell hardware, with a 120 GB SSD. Optiplex 3010 On Wed, May 23, 2018, 5:11 AM thinkpad, <1768...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Is this bug only occuring in a virtual setting (e.g. 17.10 to 18.04 in > VirtualBox) or also on non-virtual upgrade (from 17.10 to 18.04) ? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768230 > > Title: > Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to > device scanning. > > Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > After choosing "Erase disk and install ubuntu" + "Use LVM with the new > Ubuntu installation", the > system is very slow to reboot. > > It shows the message : "WARNING:Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling > back to device scanning.", > then waits 32 seconds, then continues as it should. > > I think this is a ubiquity bug, since the d-i based installer is not > affected. >- ubuntu-18.04-desktop-amd64.iso > (a55353d837cbf7bc006cf49eeff05ae5044e757498e30643a9199b9a25bc9a34) : > affected >- xubuntu-18.04-desktop-amd64.iso > (7c24318d3b1de1efd584b5aea034ce1aafd2d0f06c59812d989a5fc95bf947e3) : > affected >- ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso > (a7f5c7b0cdd0e9560d78f1e47660e066353bb8a79eb78d1fc3f4ea62a07e6cbc) : not > affected > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1768230/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768230 Title: Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1768230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927919] Re: Remmina crashes after successful connection and login to RDP server.
Is there anything new on this bug? I'm using Ubuntu 12.04, remina 0.9.99.1 I connect to many different servers on a regular basis, remina is crashing so often it's nearly unusable. Kernel 3.2.0-31 generic Gnome 3.4.2 Asus p5g41-le mainboard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927919 Title: Remmina crashes after successful connection and login to RDP server. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp/+bug/927919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 663014] Re: No result for ping in Gnome-Nettool
Works on Maverick for me. Thanks, it's great to have the tool back. On 11-05-21 05:11 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: Wally, jjinco33, and possibly others who tried, could you confirm which release you tested the fix on, since it was uploaded to Natty and Maverick. Ideally, we'd need one confirmation that this work for each of Maverick and Natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663014 Title: No result for ping in Gnome-Nettool -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663014] Re: No result for ping in Gnome-Nettool
Same problem here, I have thread in the forums about this also. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10362988#post10362988 I would love to find a work around for this other than the terminal. I like the saved ping history since I ping the same thing quite often in my network support. Terminal works and is fine but I like the nettools I hope they get this sorted soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663014 Title: No result for ping in Gnome-Nettool -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342923] Re: [i945] (Needs UXA) Kubuntu Jaunty Intel 945 GM - Poor sluggish graphics performance in Kate text, etc.
I'm running 9.04 on an Asus with the 945G chip. I had to revert to Intrepids driver to make thing acceptable. I'm with all the others on this one who think that this is ridiculous that such a major bug could be released. there is no way this bug should have been allowed to hit production. There are literally millions and millions of computers running some version of Intel graphics. 9.04 is great in every other way but this bug is huge! -- [i945] (Needs UXA) Kubuntu Jaunty Intel 945 GM - Poor sluggish graphics performance in Kate text, etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330353] Re: boot-up hangs at multiple stages
What do we need to do to help get this bug moving, honestly I'm mostly new to bug reporting. -- boot-up hangs at multiple stages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218094] Re: Wrong battery information on MSI S271 laptop with msi-laptop module loaded
I'm not entirely sure if this the same bug but here is the gnome-power applet. It thinks that my battery is a 74Wh battery and it is actually a 47Wh. Hence why it thinks the battery is at 63%. I have an HP f700 series laptop, AMD athlon X2. Product: Primary Status: Charged Percentage charge: 100.0% Vendor: Hewlett-Packard Technology: Lithium ion Serial number: Model: Primary Capacity: 63% (Poor) Current charge: 47.3 Wh Last full charge: 47.3 Wh Design charge: 74.5 Wh -- Wrong battery information on MSI S271 laptop with msi-laptop module loaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330353] Re: boot-up hangs at multiple stages
I checked with HP/Compaq. The BIOS is the most current. It doesn't mean that the problem isn't in the bios, it could mean that it needs to be updated and hasn't been. It really only means that it takes away the option to update as a possible fix. For the record my BIOS version is F.08 -- boot-up hangs at multiple stages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330353] Re: boot-up hangs at multiple stages
I checked with HP/Compaq. The BIOS is the most current. It doesn't mean that the problem isn't in the bios, it could mean that it needs to be updated and hasn't been. It really only means that it takes away the option to update as a possible fix. For the record my BIOS version is F.08 -- boot-up hangs at multiple stages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330353] [NEW] boot-up hangs at multiple stages
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.10, This was not a problem in 8.04 During the boot process, just after the orange bar appears that bounces from side to side the system will pause. The only way I've found so far to unpause is by pressing and holding the spacebar. If I press the spacebar and release it will advance the boot process slightly but when I press and hold it the boot up continues as normal. The happened during the boot up of the 8.10 live CD also, After all updates are done, even backports and proposed, the pause is still there. I have a compaq presario f700 series laptop, and there are others with this same issue, see thread; http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=967679 The common link seems to be they are all HP/compaq laptops. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- boot-up hangs at multiple stages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 134752] Re: Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
To follow up with my situation, 1. I don't use FSTAB to mount network drives anymore. As long as I'm using applications that integrate well into Gnome I'm OK. 2. This same bug will cause Nautilus to pause when connecting to Network storage devices. I have a netgear SC101 I found software that allows it to be used with Linux. However when connecting to the device Nautilus will hang/pause until the netgear device has initialized out of it's sleep mode. If the device decides to not wake up Nautilus will pause for a very long time. Michael Haggerty wrote: A followup to my last post: if I kill -HUP nautilus then allow it to restart, then the new instance runs fine (presumably until the remotely- mounted filesystem is used again). -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 134752] Re: Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
mbrennwa wrote: Just for the record: the problem has been fixed a long time ago (either in 7.04 or 7.10, I don't remember). I'm going to have to setup a samba mount and test it. I got away from doing that most because of this issue. It would be nice if this has been fixed. -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102848] Re: Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons
I can confirm this fix. On all Ubuntu workstations the Icon appears properly after removing the bookmark and adding it back. John Vivirito wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bug Watch Updater wrote: | ** Changed in: firefox |Status: Fix Released = Invalid | It seems it was FIXED but upstream marked invalid for it i will post the upstream reports https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258867 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389273 - -- Sincerely Yours, ~John Vivirito https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito Linux User# 414246 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILKxuqig4QTwcPCoRAjKnAJ9ffyvKkGAntCpZU/kMymJzFpniWgCfRx29 CPqXWxUfkUpTs4duBvXu5+I= =lTU7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102848] Re: Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons
Sorry for repost. I'm using 8.04 not 8.04b I just had too much beta on the brain! -- Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102848] Re: Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons
It's not fixed in any of my installs of 8.04b with firefox 3.0b4. It's been so long since I've seen the icon I don't remember the last time I saw it. Currently NHL.com, NBA.com sportsline.com, Ebay.ca, and all the other bookmarks have Icons. Nothing for Ubuntuforums.org though. -- Firefox bookmark doesn't display/save for large icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215810] Re: share folder does not appear
I am the owner of a folder called /media/disk I ran sudo chown steve /media/disk Under properties it shows user steve as the owner but I still can't share it. -- share folder does not appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 165097] Re: UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized
Leann Ogasawara wrote: Actually rather than editing your /etc/apt/sources.list file it's probably safer to create /etc/apt/sources.list.d/kernel-ppa.list to include the lines: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ubuntu hardy main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ubuntu hardy main It avoids possibly messing up the default repository settings that exist in /etc/apt/sources.list Thanks. Thanks Leann, I'll try this out soon. -- UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185463] Re: /mnt drive icons appear on desktop
I'm running Gutsy Gibbon with all updates. This happens to me also. In fact this has happened with all my installations of Gutsy on entirely different hardware. The only similarity is that I've been using Samba, and I got into the habit of using /mnt for my mounts. It seemed like a good place to do it. I guess now I'll be using /media. -- /mnt drive icons appear on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185463] Re: /mnt drive icons appear on desktop
It seems I mis-read the bug. Are you guys saying that proper behaviour is that a mount in /mnt is not supposed to show up on the desktop, and nautilus? Also that /media is the only folder where a mount is supposed to? I've been using /mnt since Edgy Eft. It just sounded like a better place mnt vs. media? One sounds like a mount location the other for removable devices. -- /mnt drive icons appear on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 165097] Re: UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized
That seems like a great idea, how does this get done? Chuck Short wrote: It would be easier for the upstream developer to get this patch in so we dont have to maintain it ourselves. Thanks chuck -- UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85780] Re: gThumb red eye reduction does not work
I would like to report this also. Often in pics the eyes are orange/red. The tool only works well with eyes that are clearly red. The tool needs to be configurable or needs to be made so it can remove orange/red/ or whatever to normal. If the tool was used like a drag/selection box so you select the are of the eye this would perhaps make the selection easier. That way the program would have a defined area of space to change the colors. -- gThumb red eye reduction does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85780] Re: gThumb red eye reduction does not work
That comment was perhaps a bit confusing. Really after using this tool I find that the algorithm simply needs to be adjusted. I have found that it will only work unless the eyes are perfectly red. If there is pink, orange, or anything other than red, it just leaves it alone and changes the red pixels and ignores everything else. More often than not the tool will only change a fraction of the eye and leave the rest orange, pink or white. My suggestion in the previous comment is just that if you can define the area of the eye, it might make it easier for the algorithm to handle. This way it knows that the eye has a pupil, since orange or pink is not a natural eye colour it can change it to grey/black as a pupil should be. -- gThumb red eye reduction does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 165097] Re: UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized
Hi Leann, I'm happy to hear from you. As far as answering you questions I can only ask the developer of the patch. I have had some contact with him so this won't be difficult as long as he responds to email. I must confess that I don't really understand how the mainlines and streams work. I understand there is a process to this and for now I must be happy understanding that much. I wish I knew more about programming but my strengths are elsewhere. I'll forward this message to the developer and see if I can get some answers. Steve Leann Ogasawara wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in linux-source-2.6.22. It appears that the patch you referenced is not in the mainline kernel. Do you know if there have been any efforts to get this submitted and accepted into the mainline kernel? It is a lot of extra work for the Ubuntu kernel team to maintain out of tree patches. As such they require evidence of upstream submission before considering to maintain community patches locally. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = linux-source-2.6.22 Status: New = Incomplete -- UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 165097] UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized
Public bug reported: I don't know if this counts as a bug or not but it's pretty simple. I have a few DVD's one of them being the Windows Vista DVD and they can't be read by Ubuntu. They mount as UDF volume with one text file in them. It seems that something required to read them is missing. I found source forge patches for this that supposedly correct this. I'm not a programmer or even an advanced Linux user yet so adding this patch is still slightly beyond my ability. Again I don't know if this a bug or by design. The fix seems simple though. source forge link http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?grou...95atid=300295 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 165097] Re: UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized
Sorry that sourceforge link didn't copy right. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1671912group_id=295atid=300295 -- UDF volumes 2.5 iso-133464 not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134752] Re: Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
** Also affects: nautilus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134752] Re: Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
It does seem to have some similarities. Depending on what exactly is happening it may be the same. You mentioned that the network connection is dropping. This is the same essentially as shutting down the server, at least as far as the networking is concerned. Either way the shares are accessible, this would cause Nautilus to slow down/stall. You then unmount the shares and the problem is gone. What hardware are you using? I'm using an asus board, K8V-mx it has a via chipset K8M800 and VT8237, with realtek RTL8201 onboard network adapter. I've always wondered about this since if this was a wide spread problem you would probably hear more about it in the forum. I haven't thought to try swapping in a different network card till now but I just might give it a try this weekend. -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134752] Re: Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
OK so I tried the new network card already. It was a 3com 905-tx. It made no difference. However recently I installed the Kubuntu KDE desktop on my system to see if it would make any difference in a few areas. One are being this. The difference it made was that Konqueror performs perfectly after shutting down the system and Nautilus alone has this issue. Dang since I like nautilus better. What interesting out my test is this. I shut down the server and tested nautilus, as soon as the shares became unavailable nautilus had the problem. I tried Konqueror and it was fast. I then restarted the server, as soon as the login screen came for Ubuntu, shares available, nautilus sprang to life again. No unmounting, no ctrl, alt backspace to restart things. It is totally and completely dependant on the shares being available or unavailable. So for you if you have networking issues ie. your connection drops you would have the same problems. PS on a curiosity note, are you crossover cable to connect both your computers? straight computer to computer? If so ditch that setup, buy a cheap hub/switch and watch your connection problems disappear. If your not setup this way I have no idea why your connection keeps dropping. -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134752] Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS)
Public bug reported: I have two Ubuntu systems connected in Home network Server Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Desktop Ubuntu Feisty Fawn They share files using Samba and on the Desktop I have samba mounts listed in my FSTAB using CIFS mount options. They mount perfectly during startup and I notice no problems until I shutdown the server. When it is shutdown Nautilus becomes unbearably slow on the desktop until I dismount (umount) the shares using the terminal command sudo umount (share path). As soon as the share mounts are dismounted nautilus returns to normal speed. I can reproduce it over and over again. I know this is a very rough start to a bug report, this the first one I've reported. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shutting down server causes Nautilus to slow down on Remote Ubuntu clients (SAMBA CIFS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
