[Bug 877905] Re: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly
I believe I am experiencing the same problem, and it has been reported by another user on the Ubuntu forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1864567 The symptom is that no GLX application will run. For example, compiz reports: compiz (core) - Fatal: Root visual is not a GL visual compiz (core) - Error: Failed to manage screen: 0 compiz (core) - Fatal: No manageable screens found on display :0.0 And, glxinfo reports: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request: 153 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 17 (X_GLXVendorPrivateWithReply) Serial number of failed request: 17 Current serial number in output stream: 17 However, there are no errors reported in my Xorg.0.log, including loading of GLX: (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_SGI_make_current_read (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_SGI_swap_control and GLX_MESA_swap_control (II) AIGLX: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap backed by buffer objects (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib/dri/r200_dri.so (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0 As reported in the Ubuntu forums thread, the two users there are running the 2.6.38-12 #51~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP kernel, one with pae and one generic. The problem appears with both the intel i915 driver and radeon driver. Reverting to the prior versions of xserver-common and xserver-xorg-core does restore GLX functionality, so it seems that the update is causing the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905 Title: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/877905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877905] Re: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly
Here are some other Ubuntu forums threads with users who are reporting what seems to be the same issue and, in many cases, downgrading the security update in order to restore functionality. This obviously is not a good solution. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1864221 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1136665 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1864363 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1138 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905 Title: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/877905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877905] Re: [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packages to versions in USN-1232-1
I just wanted to add my confirmation that the new packages did indeed restore GLX functionality for my system. Thank you all for the rapid response today. Hopefully the fix for CVE-2010-4818 won't be too onerous! ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-4818 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905 Title: [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packages to versions in USN-1232-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/877905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428599] Re: Tracker ignores contents of djvu files
I think a DJVU filter for tracker would be an important addition. The DJVU format is becoming popular amongst people doing DIY book scanning, thanks to these excellent tools: 1) Scan Tailor, for image post-processing http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/ 2) djvubind, a script for Linux that creates a DJVU file with searchable, positioned OCR text from Scan Tailor's output http://code.google.com/p/djvubind/ deb here: http://code.google.com/p/djvubind/downloads/list It seems that eventually the goal is to incorporate the functions of djvubind into the Scan Tailor GUI. The tools can be used on any images of pages, whether generated by a flatbed scanner (which I use) or one of the homebrew camera-based scanners developed here: http://www.diybookscanner.org/ All of that is to say that I think DJVU may become somewhat less obscure - the Internet Archive uses the format, too. The following thread from the Tracker mailing list states that what is needed is an extractor module for Tracker (as opposed to a filter - filters are no longer used in tracker = 0.7.x): http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2010-August/msg00022.html Here's the howto for writing an extractor module: http://library.gnome.org/devel/libtracker-extract/unstable/libtracker-extract-How-to-use-libtracker-extract.html I think the command needed for the extractor module is djvutxt, which is part of the djvulibre-bin package. This is as far as I've gotten with things so far. Maybe I will be able to figure out how to make an extractor module for text and metadata or maybe this information can help someone else with more skills. -- Tracker ignores contents of djvu files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418248] Re: Segmentation fault when trying to take a web screenshot
I can reproduce the segmentation fault in Lucid, 32-bit, with xulrunner 1.9.2.7. -- Segmentation fault when trying to take a web screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586243] Re: Xorg freeze: Failed to schedule IB Radeon X1200
Is this the same thing? http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26144 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26144 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26144 -- Xorg freeze: Failed to schedule IB Radeon X1200 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586243 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
I changed the status back to new to reopen this bug because, as per the last series of messages, the fix to poppler does not fix the rendering in Evince for all PDFs. Sorry if this wasn't the correct action to take; I just wanted to make sure that the bug remains visible. ** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
the bug described there has been fixed, if you still have an issue open a new one Three people in this thread have reported that the bug has not been fixed for all PDFs when viewed in Evince. -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
I've attached a screen shot of two pages of the PDF posted in comment #52 as rendered by evince in Lucid (updated on April 11). Check out the difference in the rendering in the thumbnail images on the left. The thumbnail for page 9, which is anti-aliased, appears in grey tones, while the thumbnails of the pages which are not anti-aliased appear in black-and-white. The pages themselves are rendered similarly to the thumbnails, as the screenshots show. In xpdf, all of the pages are anti-aliased equally, both in Lucid and in Karmic. Likewise in Okular. Since these two applications also use poppler, it seems that there is something specific to evince that still needs attention. ** Attachment added: Page comparison.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43793036/Page%20comparison.png -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
For me, some of the pages of document posted in #52 are anti-aliased with the patch in Lucid, and some of the pages in that same document are not. I haven't found any other PDF file like that in my collection of many hundreds of PDF files (I didn't try all of them, just several arbitrarily chosen groups of different PDF files). It's odd. -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
The java problem is version-dependent. For example, I'm using the icedtea plugin with Zotero 2.02, Firefox 3.5.8 and OpenOffice.org 3.2 with no issues. My understanding is that for Zotero's integration with OpenOffice.org to work with Firefox ≥ 3.6, IcedTea6 1.7 is required, specifically the new IcedTea NPRuntime-based plugin included with IcedTea6 1.7. Otherwise the Sun java plugin is required. Here's a relevant thread at the Zotero forums: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/11429/zotero-in-ubuntu-104-lucid-lynx/ I believe that the need for the NPRuntime-based plugin is not limited to Zotero's OOo extension but that it is needed for all java applets to run in Firefox ≥ 3.6. Since Lucid has Firefox 3.6.3, I'm thinking that it's likely that the IcedTea NPRuntime plugin will be available on realease of Lucid. In any case, there continue to be new builds of OpenJDK for Lucid: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6 As of this writing, the last release was just four days ago. All of that is to say that I've been waiting for Lucid final before concluding that the plugin from Sun will be required for the Zotero/OOo integration extension. It seems possible that it may not be a requirement. I don't have any authoritative knowledge on any of this, it's just what I've gathered from reading. But it's one reason why I haven't yet updated the Ubuntu wiki page for Zotero 2.0 yet: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Zotero FWIW, Zotero is now GPLv3: http://www.zotero.org/support/changelog#changes_in_2.0rc1_january_26_2010 -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
That's fine by me, the original reporter. After the initial responses to this bug, I decided I didn't really care about the matter. I only added information today for people who might find this bug when searching for information about using Zotero with Lucid. Close the bug if it will improve statistics. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
So then the bug can be left as is. I was just thinking that maybe something about it could have been useful in some way. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
I checked out the patched version with the Lucid Daily Live CD, and it looks great. Thanks! Is there any chance that the patch could be backported for Karmic? -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
there is no karmic change schedule for the moment no, lucid be stable in 2 weeks Yes, I know that lucid will be released shortly. But I myself will not be upgrading immediately because I am working on a long project and I want to wait until that is finished. The project involves a lot of scanned-paper PDF files, which is why I was asking about a backport. I suppose I will continue to use Okular. BTW, every PDF I tried is anti-aliased with the patch in lucid. These are all black-and-white images, in varying resolutions (150-600 dpi). The comment above indicating that the patch is not working for all images concerns color images. Maybe that is a meaningful difference. -- Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
Yes, in the end, I do think it would be best to wait on packaging Zotero for Ubuntu. Perhaps it's worth noting that Zotero is not at all unstable from a user's point of view, or at least, it's not for me. I've been using it fairly extensively for over a year now and had no real problems (i.e., data loss, drastic malfunction). However, Zotero is somewhat unstable from a packager's point of view, just because there are still a lot of releases at present, too many for backports. I think it would be best to wait and see what the development roadmap looks like after the 1.5 release, which is currently in public beta testing. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
@Dimitrios Symeonidis: Thanks for taking the time to post again, I appreciate and accept your apology. @John Vivirito: @Alexander Sack: I've been thinking about this project, and before proceeding, I'd like to talk with you guys about how backports work for Firefox extensions that have been packaged for Ubuntu. The thing is, Zotero is still in active development and gets updated fairly frequently. Not as frequently as some extensions (NoScript, for example), but still. The updates fix bugs, add new features, and are definitely worth using. So, I'd like to find out more about whether the Ubuntu package can get updated as Zotero is updated, which I suppose would involve backports. If the package cannot be updated, I can see that things could get complicated for supporting users. It would be a shame if the first support step for anyone using an Ubuntu package of Zotero is uninstall the Ubuntu version and update from the Zotero site. In fact, Zotero already recommends using their site rather than addons.mozilla.org, precisely because there can be a delay before new releases are available there. See the last paragraph here: http://www.zotero.org/documentation/installation Maybe it would be better to wait until Zotero development stabilizes. I don't know how long that might take - right now, there's a 1.5 version in public beta-testing, which adds some great features like remote sync of the Zotero database. Here's the development roadmap, it looks like a lot of releases are planned through the coming autumn: http://www.zotero.org/documentation/development_roadmap I'll try to bring this up for discussion on IRC in the near future, unless there are other suggestions. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this. Zotero is in the Suggested extensions missing details section of this wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=showredirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Extensions I put it in that section because there is a question about the license. Zotero uses the ECL license, version 1. See: http://www.zotero.org/documentation/#small_print_stuff http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ecl1.php ECLv1 isn't listed as a good license on the wiki, but it is supposed to be OSS. I haven't done anything at all about trying to make a package myself because I thought it would be better to wait until I heard whether the license would be OK for Ubuntu. Thanks again. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
The OOo extension is specifically for Zotero. Basically, it allows Zotero to be used as a Bibliography manager for OOo. You can see more about how it works here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Zotero#Integration%20with%20OpenOffice.org (There's a screenshot, too :).) The Zotero extension is an OXT file that is available of the Zotero site: http://www.zotero.org/documentation/openoffice_integration So, it's not at all the same as the Mozilla extension for OOo, which allows office files to be viewed in the browser: http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy-updates/mozilla-openoffice.org I couldn't find mozilla-openoffice.org listed on launchpad, but it is in the repos. I'm using version 2.4.1-1ubuntu2 from hardy-updates, and there is a package for intrepid. Actually, packaging the OOo extension is probably something to be taken up with the OOo team rather than the Mozilla team, so it's not really on-topic for this bug. In any case, the Firefox extension is the first thing to think about, since the Zotero OOo extension won't work without it. I will see what I can do about trying to package Zotero, and I'll subscribe to the mailing list. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173371] Re: No way to Print Selection
There is an option to print a selection in Firefox 3 (tested with firefox-3.0+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1). In the GTK+ printing dialog (File - Print), choose the Options tab. You should see a check box for Print Selection Only. It will be grayed out unless a something has been selected in the text before calling the print dialog. I've added a screenshot of the dialog. I wonder why other applications like epiphany, gedit and evince don't include this option as well. It seems like something that should be standardized for all GTK+ applications. ** Attachment added: Firefox.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15853644/Firefox.png -- No way to Print Selection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46017] Re: Mozplugger cannot open 2 instances of the same pdf document
So I had some more time to investigate, and in fact I think this is an evince bug. It is possible to open more than one file when using other PDF readers (acroread, xpdf, epdfview). Also, other plugins are able to open several documents in different tabs at once (tested with DJVU files using djview4 and ODT docs using mozilla-openoffice.org). Evince seems to do something different with window management. Maybe the following evince bug applies? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475915 -- Mozplugger cannot open 2 instances of the same pdf document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
I'm not sure that Zotero is my favorite extension, whatever that means, but it is a useful if specialized tool for researchers and students. And, I believe that including this kind of software in Ubuntu will help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 Anyway, I've added a Zotero documentation page to the Ubuntu community wiki: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Zotero Please reconsider the Invalid status. Thanks. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
Hmm, not to be argumentative, but it seems to me that there are a series of Firefox extensions included in Ubuntu. For example: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adblock-plus But maybe what you mean is that packages in the Universe repository are not considered to be in Ubuntu. Like I said before, I only opened this bug because I thought I was supposed to do so when adding Zotero here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions Actually, Zotero doesn't need any packaging to be used in Ubuntu. Users can get everything they need from the Zotero website. So, sorry to have wasted anyone's time if I have. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46017] Re: Mozplugger cannot open 2 instances of the same pdf document
I can confirm this on hardy as well, with a clean installation of mozplugger (i.e., with all mozpluggerrc and pluginreg.dat files deleted). My computer is updated from hardy-proposed. I found the following bug on the mozplugger bugzilla, that seems relevant: https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17775 It's marked RESOLVED-FIXED as of version 1.10.0. Also see this upstream bug: https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13048 -- Mozplugger cannot open 2 instances of the same pdf document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] [NEW] Zotero (Firefox extension)
Public bug reported: Zotero: http://www.zotero.org/ Zotero [zoh-TAIR-oh] is a free, easy-to-use Firefox extension to help you collect, manage, and cite your research sources. It lives right where you do your work — in the web browser itself. It's a very useful extension for anyone who does academic or other scholarly research. In addition to scraping citation data directly into its database from the many supported online libraries and other sites, Zotero also allows for web snapshots, PDFs and other files to be associated with the database entries, tagging, full-text searching, export in different styles to a variety of formats. Backup and synching features are in testing. If Zotero can be packaged for Ubuntu, it also would be nice to package the extension for OpenOffice.org, which enables references stored in Zotero's database to be inserted into ODT documents with formatting. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239575] Re: Zotero (Firefox extension)
I'm sorry, it wasn't meant as an advertisement. I really would like to see Zotero packaged for Ubuntu, and maybe to see if I can help out with that. I opened this bug because I thought that was expected. I was following the instructions on the page for Firefox extensions in the Ubuntu wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions I made an entry for Zotero on the Firefox extensions wiki page in the Suggested extensions missing details section because that's what I was told to do on #ubuntu-mozillateam, which I visited to ask about the license of Zotero which is supposedly open but isn't listed in the wiki (it's the Educational Community License, version 1). And the wiki said to include a launchpad bug report, so I made this one. I just followed the examples I found for other Firefox extensions, like this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/158835 I have no affiliation with Zotero, other than being a user of the extension. I don't think interest in having Zotero packaged for Ubuntu is invalid, but oh well. -- Zotero (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
@Chonnawonga With the 2.6.22-14-generic kernel, no patch or module renaming is needed on my machine. The AGP aperture size is recognized correctly and direct rendering works with no modifications. Both amd64-agp and the stock, unmodified version of sis-agp are loaded. The only problem I experience is the APIC error discussed above. This error does not seem to have any bad effects other than filling up the logs, though. I've experienced no other problems, even with desktop effects enabled. I can't comment on power management. I'm not using hibernate or suspend at present. -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
The APIC errors begin when the drm module is loaded: Nov 15 12:59:29 menagerie kernel: [ 45.484698] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.27.0 20060524 on minor 0 Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.527659] agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at :00:00.0. Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.527832] agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :00:00.0 into 8x mode Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.529800] agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :01:00.0 into 8x mode Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.895092] [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.895100] [drm] Loading R200 Microcode Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.895142] [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs Nov 15 12:59:32 menagerie kernel: [ 48.467376] APIC error on CPU0: 00(40) Nov 15 12:59:32 menagerie kernel: [ 48.833567] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 15 12:59:32 menagerie kernel: [ 49.382855] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) etc. They appear if sis-agp is blacklisted but amd64-agp is loaded (in which case drm can load as well). So maybe it is a separate issue. I don't know, do you think it needs a new bug? -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
So they don't appear if both sis-agp and amd64-agp are loaded (which is the normal case)? No. Sorry I wasn't clear. Here's what I observe: 1) sis-agp and amd64-agp are loaded - APIC errors 2) only amd64-agp is loaded - APIC errors 3) only sis-agp - no APIC errors, but no drm module or direct rendering either In other words, there is no case for me in which direct rendering works AND there are no APIC errors. -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
I've installed Ubuntu now. :) With linux-image-2.6.22-14-generic (version 2.6.22-14.46), the size of the AGP aperture is identified correctly: cat /var/log/dmesg | grep agpgart [ 33.994241] Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones [ 34.107968] agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0 [ 34.111845] agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xf000 DRI is working, as well, with both the sis-agp and the amd64-agp modules loaded. However, the APIC errors continue: Nov 14 00:23:53 menagerie kernel: [39901.561197] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.100165] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.558190] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.558507] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.558936] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.559095] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.742347] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:54 menagerie kernel: [39902.742956] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Nov 14 00:23:55 menagerie kernel: [39903.359838] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
I had a chance to experiment with things some, and I think I made a little progress. I was doing this on a Gentoo system with a 2.6.22 kernel compiled from gentoo-sources, but I don't think that makes a difference. Although this is amd64 hardware, I'm using an x86 kernel/OS. As I mentioned in the a href=https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8840freedesktop bug/a, it seems to me that incorrect identification of the AGP aperture size as 4M no matter what the BIOS setting is related to the SIS 760 device IDs in the sis-agp module of the kernel. If that is the case, then it should be possible to comment out the device IDs and recompile the module in order to see how the aperture size is identified. I had tried to do this before and apparently made some mistakes, but this time I did things correctly. Because, when I booted using the modified sis-agp module, I saw the following in the syslog: Oct 31 10:00:31 menagerie agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0 Oct 31 10:00:31 menagerie agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xf000 Compare this with the unaltered kernel module: [ 102.351910] agpgart: Detected SiS 760 chipset [ 102.352228] agpgart: AGP aperture is 4M @ 0xf000 128M is the BIOS setting. I've attached a patch to show what I changed in the sis-agp module to get the above result. Unfortunately, however, using this altered module did not solve the APIC error problem. That is, with the altered sis-agp module and amd64-agp loaded, the AGP aperture size was identified correctly during boot, DRI was enabled, but the stream of APIC errors began once the drm module was loaded. So it's not really a patch that solves things for me, just some more information that I thought might be useful. @Neil Wilson, I'm using the most recent beta BIOS for my motherboard (asus k8s-mx). I've upgraded the BIOS twice since opening this bug, with no effect on the problem. Regarding the noapic boot option, I've used that too but found it a problematic workaround. For me, it leads to IRQ problems such as: Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie irq 7: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0148be4] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x80 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0148e91] note_interrupt+0x251/0x280 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0148115] handle_IRQ_event+0x25/0x50 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c014987d] handle_level_irq+0xcd/0x110 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c010672e] do_IRQ+0x3e/0x80 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c010498f] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0102b3a] default_idle+0x2a/0x40 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c01023e3] cpu_idle+0x43/0x80 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0462b2f] start_kernel+0x21f/0x2b0 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c0462450] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x260 Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie === Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie handlers: Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie [c02ddf50] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60) Oct 31 06:04:20 menagerie Disabling IRQ #7 And that is accompanied by the whole system freezing. Again, this is only when using noapic at boot. The mother board I'm using is kind of strange because it has both an AGP slot and a PCI Express slot (1x), maybe that's part of the issue. I don't have anything plugged into the PCIe slot, though. In any case, I believe that my experiment with the device IDs suggests that the issue is with the kernel module. And I notice that the AGP kernel maintainer, Dave Airlie, has already responded to this bug, so... In any case, there is now some evidence that there is a regression here as far as the SIS AGP driver is concerned and that it is not a matter of BIOS setting or updates. Thanks. ** Attachment added: sis-agp module minus the SIS 760 device ID info http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10250120/sis-agp.c.patch -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
@Neil Wilson Hi, We only took the route of deleting the module because I'm using a LiveCD and so could not blacklist and reboot with that change saved. It's just a workaround because I don't have an Ubuntu install at present (although I will install if needed). At this point, I think there are two problems. Problem 1: If both the amd64_agp and the sis_agp drivers are loaded, then there is a conflict that prevents the size of the agp aperture from being identified correctly (4M rather than the setting in the BIOS, which is 128M for me); dri is not enabled. Problem 2: If only the amd64_agp driver is used, then dri works too, BUT the system also produces a steady stream of APIC errors which are written to the syslog at varying rates (more frequently for me than for awen, it seems). Do you happen to see the APIC errors in your syslog, too? Since the kernel instructions indicate that both amd64_agp and a chipset specific module are needed for amd64 systems, maybe it's not too surprising that there is some kind of adverse effect to not using sis_agp at all. (I'm referring to the instruction that are visible from the curses menuconfig interface, I'm actually not sure where they are located to make a link to show what I'm talking about). -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
@Tormod Well, I'm not able to remove the sis_agp module once it's been loaded during the LiveCD boot, even after stopping gdm and manually removing all other modules related to video (radeon, drm, amd64_agp) - agpgart cannot be removed either, but that makes sense because it depends on sis_agp. I also tried booting in safe graphics mode. But it seems that once the sis_agp module is active, it can't be unloaded. So I will try installing Ubuntu to a partition and then renaming the sis agp module. -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
I was able to delete the module from the busybox shell and then boot into the LiveCD, and direct rendering is now working. Yay! And thanks for the hand-holding, I don't have a lot of experience with LiveCDs. There is one side effect I've noticed, however. I'm seeing lots of APIC errors being written to the syslog. For example: Oct 24 16:05:54 ubuntu kernel: [ 2638.714843] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.289894] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.403286] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.563636] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.627564] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.714194] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:55 ubuntu kernel: [ 2639.723033] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:56 ubuntu kernel: [ 2640.718361] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:56 ubuntu kernel: [ 2640.718800] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:56 ubuntu kernel: [ 2640.798309] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Oct 24 16:05:57 ubuntu kernel: [ 2640.964440] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) Over and over again, many times per second. Does anyone else see this, too? Any ideas what to do about it, other than maybe finding a way to disable logging of the errors? -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
Hi, I'm still seeing this problem with the i386 version of Ubuntu 7.10, using the LiveCD. So, my experience is that the bug is not amd64 only. The AGP aperture size is set to 128M in my BIOS. But agpgart only recognizes it to be 4M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo cat /var/log/dmesg | grep agpgart [ 132.042214] Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones [ 132.345993] agpgart: Detected SiS chipset - id:1888 [ 132.346322] agpgart: AGP aperture is 4M @ 0xf000 In the xorg log, dri seems to be loading fine but then there is the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep bind (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] Could not bind I have attached a complete copy of the xorg log. The following error appears in the kernel log: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo cat /var/log/kern.log | grep drm Oct 23 12:57:06 ubuntu kernel: [ 171.618188] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 Oct 23 12:57:06 ubuntu kernel: [ 171.663073] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.27.0 20060524 on minor 0 Oct 23 12:57:12 ubuntu kernel: [ 173.904447] [drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held Oct 23 12:57:12 ubuntu kernel: [ 173.904654] [drm:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 8267 using kernel context 0 I have not tried the fix in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45942 in Ubuntu because I am trying the liveCD. However, I have tried renaming the sis_agp module in a Gentoo installation, with kernels up to 2.6.23, and this did not change how the AGP aperture size was identified as 4M. I've also tried patching the device ids in the kernel so that the particular model of the SIS chipset isn't identified, but that didn't fix things either although I might have made errors with this. Please let me know if other log files from a LiveCD boot would be useful. If anyone is willing to try to fix the issue and needs a tester, I will be happy to install Ubuntu as well. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10131005/Xorg.0.log -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51492] Re: movemail problem
I was looking at the upstream bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278383 , and it looks like it is only recorded there as a FreeBSD problem, as opposed to a problem for Linux users as well. I wonder if that needs to be addressed? I don't have an account on mozilla's bugzilla so I'm commenting here instead, I hope that's OK. -- movemail problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken
Hi, sorry for the slow response and thank you very much for attending to this bug. I wasn't able to reboot to try the Feisty beta CD until this evening. Unfortunately, things are still not working for me with Feisty. The xorg.log indicates that agp could not bind and suggests verifying the order in which the agpgart and the radeon modules are loaded. Lsmod and dmesg both indicate that agp is found, although during boot the size of the agp aperture detected is way off, reading 4M rather than the 128M that is there. Here's some output from after the boot: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glxinfo | grep render direct rendering: No OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep agp (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Mode 0x1f004e09 [AGP 0x1039/0x0760; Card 0x1002/0x5960] (II) RADEON(0): [agp] 8192 kB allocated with handle 0x0001 (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] Could not bind (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod | grep agp amd64_agp 13572 0 sis_agp 9476 1 agpgart33480 3 drm,amd64_agp,sis_agp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /var/log/dmesg | grep agp [ 101.260783] Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones [ 102.351910] agpgart: Detected SiS 760 chipset [ 102.352228] agpgart: AGP aperture is 4M @ 0xf000 Let me know if I can help with debugging. I will be happy to do so, especially after mid-April since until then I have an on-going project here that makes rebooting difficult. And thanks again for continuing to look into this, it's much appreciated. :-) -- sis 760 AGP broken https://launchpad.net/bugs/34144 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
