[Bug 2072708] [NEW] dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list

2024-07-10 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

I did a `do-release-upgrade` and ran into:

Unpacking fonts-dejavu-mono (2.37-8) ...
Preparing to unpack .../169-fontconfig-config_2.15.0-1.1ubuntu2_amd64.deb ...
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontconfig-config' is not installed
Use dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list archive files contents.
dpkg-query: package 'fontc

[Bug 2072701] Re: do-release-upgrade failed (due to out of disk space)

2024-07-10 Thread timeless
Fwiw, `/` is a 10GB volume (this includes `/boot`)

There are a number of other volumes but very little of what the an
installer/upgrader would touch are outside of `/`.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072701

Title:
  do-release-upgrade failed (due to out of disk space)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2072701/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072701] [NEW] do-release-upgrade failed (due to out of disk space)

2024-07-10 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

Please report this bug in a browser at
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+filebug
and attach the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ to the bug report.
E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
 unable to flush /var/lib/dpkg/updates/tmp.i after padding: No space left on 
device
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1164, in emit
self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1144, in flush
self.stream.flush()
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Call stack:
  File "/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-gdo10meu/./xorg_fix_proprietary.py", line 
88, in 
logging.info("%s running" % sys.argv[0])
Message: '/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running'
Arguments: ()
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1164, in emit
self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1144, in flush
self.stream.flush()
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Call stack:
  File "/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-gdo10meu/./xorg_fix_proprietary.py", line 
91, in 
logging.info("No xorg.conf, exiting")
Message: 'No xorg.conf, exiting'
Arguments: ()
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1164, in emit
self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1144, in flush
self.stream.flush()
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Call stack:
  File "/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/convert_list_to_deb822.py", line 32, in 

cfg = UAConfig()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/config.py", line 96, in __init__
self.cfg, self.invalid_keys = parse_config(self.cfg_path)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/config.py", line 491, in 
parse_config
LOG.debug("Using client configuration file at %s", config_path)
Message: 'Using client configuration file at %s'
Arguments: ('/etc/ubuntu-advantage/uaclient.conf',)
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1164, in emit
self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1144, in flush
self.stream.flush()
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Call stack:
  File "/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/convert_list_to_deb822.py", line 32, in 

cfg = UAConfig()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/config.py", line 96, in __init__
self.cfg, self.invalid_keys = parse_config(self.cfg_path)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/config.py", line 493, in 
parse_config
cfg.update(safe_load(system.load_file(config_path)))
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/system.py", line 522, in 
load_file
LOG.debug("Reading file: %s", filename)
Message: 'Reading file: %s'
Arguments: ('/etc/ubuntu-advantage/uaclient.conf',)
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/files/files.py", line 65, in 
read
content = system.load_file(self.path)
  ^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/system.py", line 521, in 
load_file
with open(filename, "rb") as stream:
 
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
'/var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/private/user-config.json'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1164, in emit
self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/logging/__init__.py", line 1144, in flush
self.stream.flush()
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Call stack:
  File "/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/convert_list_to_deb822.py", line 32, in 

cfg = UAConfig()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/config.py", line 102, in 
__init__
self.user_config = user_config_file.user_config.read()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/files/user_config_file.py", 
line 131, in read
private_config = self._private.read()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/files/data_types.py", line 39, 
in read
raw_data = self.ua_file.read()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/files/files.py", line 67, in 
read
LOG.debug("Tried to load %s but file does not exist", self.path)
Message: 'Tried to load %s but file does not exist'
Arguments: ('/var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/private/user-config.json',)
--- Logging error ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/files/files.py", line 65, in 
read
content = system.load_file(self.path)
  ^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/system.py", line 521, in 
load_file
with open(filename, "rb") as stream:
 
File

[Bug 1976395] Re: Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

2022-05-31 Thread timeless
I'm splitting this off from:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/937040/comments/8

That original ticket related to a `dovecot-common` which is gone.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976395

Title:
  Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1976395/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976395] [NEW] Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

2022-05-31 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

```
$ sudo ufw status
WARN: Duplicate profile 'Dovecot IMAP', using last found
WARN: Duplicate profile 'Dovecot Secure IMAP', using last found
WARN: Duplicate profile 'Dovecot POP3', using last found
WARN: Duplicate profile 'Dovecot Secure POP3', using last found
Status: inactive
```

```
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename:   bionic

$ dpkg -l|grep dovecot
ii  dovecot-core   1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.7
   amd64secure POP3/IMAP server - core files
ii  dovecot-imapd  1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.7
   amd64secure POP3/IMAP server - IMAP daemon
ii  dovecot-pop3d  1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.7
   amd64secure POP3/IMAP server - POP3 daemon
$ for a in dovecot-core dovecot-imapd dovecot-pop3d; do echo $a:; dpkg -L $a 
|grep ufw|grep d/; done
dovecot-core:
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-core
dovecot-imapd:
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-imapd
dovecot-pop3d:
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-pop3d

$ for a in /etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-*; do echo $a:; cat $a; done
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-core:
[Dovecot POP3]
title=Secure mail server (POP3)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=110/tcp

[Dovecot Secure POP3]
title=Secure mail server (POP3S)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=995/tcp

[Dovecot IMAP]
title=Secure mail server (IMAP)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=143/tcp

[Dovecot Secure IMAP]
title=Secure mail server (IMAPS)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=993/tcp
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-imapd:
[Dovecot IMAP]
title=Secure mail server (IMAP)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=143/tcp

[Dovecot Secure IMAP]
title=Secure mail server (IMAPS)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=993/tcp
/etc/ufw/applications.d/dovecot-pop3d:
[Dovecot POP3]
title=Secure mail server (POP3)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=110/tcp

[Dovecot Secure POP3]
title=Secure mail server (POP3S)
description=Dovecot is a mail server whose major goals are security and extreme
 reliability.
ports=995/tcp
```

** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) => dovecot (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976395

Title:
  Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1976395/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923331] [NEW] configuring roundcube-core mysql said: ERROR: ASCII '\0' appeared in the statement, but this is not allowed unless option --binary-mode is enabled and mysql is run in non-interacti

2021-04-10 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

do-release-upgrade from xenial to bionic

2021-04-11 02:29:03 upgrade roundcube-core:all 1.2~beta+dfsg.1-0ubuntu1
1.3.6+dfsg.1-1

lsb_release -rd:
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04

apt-cache policy roundcube-core:
roundcube-core:
  Installed: 1.3.6+dfsg.1-1
  Candidate: 1.3.6+dfsg.1-1
  Version table:
 *** 1.3.6+dfsg.1-1 500
500 http://us-east1.gce.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Expected results: roundcube-core successfully updates w/o issue

Actual results:

```
 ┌┤ Configuring 
roundcube-core 
├─┐
 │ An error occurred while upgrading the database:  

 │
 │  

 │
 │ mysql said: ERROR: ASCII '\0' appeared in the statement, but this is not 
allowed unless option --binary-mode is enabled and mysql is run in 
non-interactive   │
 │ mode. Set --binary-mode to 1 if ASCII '\0' is expected. Query: 'b0VIM 8.0'.  

 │
 │  

 │
 │ Fortunately, 
/var/cache/dbconfig-common/backups/roundcube_1.2~beta+dfsg.1-0ubuntu1.2021-04-11-03.24.28
 should hold a backup of the database, made just│
 │ before the upgrade (unless the error occurred during backup creation, in 
which case no changes will have been applied yet). Your options are:
 │
```

I'm going to configure mariadb to use --binary-mode which I expect will
resolve my issue. But it seemed worth reporting as I can't find a
reference for mariadb+roundcube+"binary-mode".

** Affects: roundcube (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923331

Title:
  configuring roundcube-core mysql said: ERROR: ASCII '\0' appeared in
  the statement, but this is not allowed unless option --binary-mode is
  enabled and mysql is run in non-interactive   │  │ mode. Set --binary-
  mode to 1 if ASCII '\0' is expected. Query: 'b0VIM 8.0'.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roundcube/+bug/1923331/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900767] [NEW] package lxd 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 -- zpool missing

2020-10-20 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

We were running lxd w/ a zfs (zpool) backing our system. We retired the
service that had been running in lxd (stopping the lxd container) and
the zpool was removed from the computer.

When we tried to upgrade (from bionic to focal), the lxd upgrade failed.

It's true, we effectively shot ourselves in our foot (years ago).

Solution:
1. systemctl stop lxd.service lxd.socket
1. mv /var/lib/lxd /var/lib/lxd.0
1. zfs create tank/lxd
1. zfs get compression tank/lxd # returns lz4
1. lxc storage create pool1 zfs source=tank/lxd
1. systemctl start lxd.service lxd.socket

Expected result:
it'd be nice if there was a vaguely helpful error message -- I used `strace` to 
slowly figure out that there were 
`/var/lib/lxd/database/global/snapshots/*/state.bin` references to it and there 
wasn't any particularly obvious way to do anything to resolve this (renaming 
the snapshots directory didn't result in a happy state).

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lxd 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-122.124-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-122-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.18
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:40:04 2020
ErrorMessage: new lxd package pre-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: lxd
Title: package lxd 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new lxd 
package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-20 (0 days ago)

** Affects: lxd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal third-party-packages uec-images

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900767

Title:
  package lxd 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new lxd
  package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status
  1 -- zpool missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1900767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856613] [NEW] apt upgrade wants to install openjdk-11-jre-headless without upgprading anything

2019-12-16 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

Notable, upon logging in, I get this message:
```
3 packages can be updated.
1 update is a security update.
```

This is fairly misleading, since afaict, the three packages it's listing
as "updated" are in fact "new installs" as opposed to "upgrades".
However, that isn't the primary point of my bug report.

I'm actually relying on that information via:
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check 2>&1|sed -e "s/;.*//"
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check 2>&1|sed -e "s/.*;//"

So, I connect to the box and perform:

`apt upgrade`:
```
Hit:1 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Hit:2 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease
Hit:3 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease
Ign:5 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ InRelease
Get:6 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ Release [1479 B]
Get:7 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ Release.gpg [819 B]
Hit:8 https://repo.zabbix.com/zabbix/4.0/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Fetched 2298 B in 1s (4382 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
1 package can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see it.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libasound2 libasound2-data openjdk-11-jre-headless
The following packages have been kept back:
  cypher-shell
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.8 MB of archives.
After this operation, 173 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
```

Apt apparently discovered a newer version of `cypher-shell`. That newer
version requires `openjdk-11-jre-headless`, so it added that to the list
of things to install. That new package requires two additional packages
(`libasound2` and `libasound2-data`). `apt` then discovers that this
newer version of `cypher-shell` conflicts w/ a manually installed
package (`neo4j`). It thus marks `cypher-shell` as `kept-back`,
unfortunately, it doesn't discard its plans to install java11.

For comparison, `apt-get upgrade` just recognizes that it shouldn't upgrade 
`cypher-shell`:
`apt-get upgrade`:
```
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  cypher-shell
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
```

```
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Release:18.04
```

`apt-cache policy apt cypher-shell neo4j openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 
openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64`:
```
apt:
  Installed: 1.6.12
  Candidate: 1.6.12
  Version table:
 *** 1.6.12 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main 
amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.6.6ubuntu0.1 500
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 
Packages
 1.6.1 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 
Packages
cypher-shell:
  Installed: 1.1.12
  Candidate: 4.0.0
  Version table:
 4.0.0 500
500 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ Packages
 *** 1.1.12 500
500 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
...
neo4j:
  Installed: 1:3.5.13
  Candidate: 1:3.5.13
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.5.13 500
500 http://debian.neo4j.org/repo stable/ Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
...
openjdk-11-jre-headless:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 11.0.4+11-1ubuntu2~18.04.3
  Version table:
 11.0.4+11-1ubuntu2~18.04.3 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main 
amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 
Packages
openjdk-8-jre-headless:
  Installed: 8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
  Candidate: 8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu 
bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 8u162-b12-1 500
500 http://us-east-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe 
amd64 Packages
```

Expected results: as with `apt-get upgrade`, don't try to install jre11.
Actual results: tries to install jre11 (it does succeed if I say yes, but that 
then breaks some customer software which we manually installed which doesn't 
like java11 -- that's a separate set of bugs, and they aren't packaged, so 
there's no guidance to apt telling it not to do that).

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1790657] Re: amqp-tools server parameter unusable

2019-04-17 Thread timeless
According to github, it's fixed in 0.9.0:
https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/commit/5dfe5d2f2680a4639090a9c239a2b0018d90c789#diff-0d2986f9db9bba422328c4379976b6d9

Would it be possible to upgrade the package?
Or would someone prefer to backport the fix?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790657

Title:
  amqp-tools server parameter unusable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librabbitmq/+bug/1790657/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1800792] Re: Update to 8u181-b13-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 breaks Maven builds

2018-11-09 Thread timeless
I think I have a Jenkins build system that has hit this error twice.
Once involving git polling (okhttp), and once involving svn checkouts.

If I understand @mirabilos's comment from Nov 2 correctly, people are
claiming that any software that breaks due to this change is by
definition broken and should be fixed. That at best Ubuntu/Debian may be
willing to temporarily unbreak such software, but the working assumption
is that eventually that temporary reprieve would be revoked.

If I'm right, could someone please help identify which software in this
stack trace is doing something "wrong" per the new definition?

>From my read of the stack,
org.tmatesoft.svn.core.internal.util.SVNSocketFactory.createSSLSocket
calls sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake which then spends a
large number of frames within sun.security.ssl until it eventually can't
access
sun.security.ssl.SSLSessionImpl.(Lsun/security/ssl/ProtocolVersion;Lsun/security/ssl/CipherSuite;Ljava/util/Collection;Lsun/security/ssl/SessionId;Ljava/lang/String;IZ)V

Naïvely, I'd blame the maintainers of sun.security.ssl. If I'm not
mistaken, I believe that sun.security.ssl is also part of the jdk/jre
packages.

** Attachment added: "Jenkins log from build"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/1800792/+attachment/5210973/+files/java-update-8u181-b13-1ubuntu0.18.04.1-svn-failure.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800792

Title:
  Update to 8u181-b13-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 breaks Maven builds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-11/+bug/1800792/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1748540] Re: do-release-upgrade breaks if /etc/apt/preferences.d has a rule against a release

2018-02-26 Thread timeless
Sorry, the logs I have right now are from after I removed the
preferences and the system was able to upgrade.

I suppose I could at some point set this up in a VM, but I don't have
time now.

** Tags added: dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748540

Title:
  do-release-upgrade breaks if /etc/apt/preferences.d has a rule against
  a release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1748540/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1748540] [NEW] do-release-upgrade breaks if /etc/apt/preferences.d has a rule against a release

2018-02-09 Thread timeless
Public bug reported:

The system was Ubuntu Xenial (16.04.3) LTS.

I occasionally try to install a newer version of OpenSSH by using three
files (note that in previous incarnations they had "zenity" instead of
"artful", the idea is "a slightly newer release of the platform I'm
using for a specific set of packages -- but don't upgrade the farm"):

/etc/apt/preferences.d/01-artful:
Package: *
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: -10

/etc/apt/preferences.d/02-artful-ssh:
Package: openssh-client
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: libgssapi-krb5-2
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: libkrb5-3
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: libkrb5support0
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: libk5crypto3
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: openssh-server
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

Package: openssh-sftp-server
Pin: release n=artful
Pin-Priority: 600

/etc/apt/sources.list.d/artful.list:
deb http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful main restricted
deb-src http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful main restricted

## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful-updates main restricted
deb-src http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful-updates main restricted
root@mail-ca:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/artful.list.distUpgrade
deb http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful main restricted
deb-src http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful main restricted

## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful-updates main restricted
deb-src http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ artful-updates main restricted



This didn't work for OpenSSH as the artful version requires a newer version of 
libc6. So, I decided to do a release upgrade (but left the files in place...)

I set `Prompt=normal` in `/etc/update-manager/release-upgrades` and ran
do-release-upgrade

It eventually gave me:
```
The software on this computer is up to date.

There are no upgrades available for your system. The upgrade will now
be canceled.


Do you want to start the upgrade?


 Continue [yN]  Details [d]

```

Which was very confusing... Along this path, it even encouraged me to
reboot my computer (which I did).

Nothing was harmed, but nothing particularly useful was achieved either.


Expected results:
When do-release-upgrade performs an update, it has enough knowledge to ignore 
the files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ because it understands they're likely to 
conflict with the release upgrade process. It should either do the same form 
/etc/apt/preferences.d/ or warn to the user in case it runs into a circumstance 
like mine.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: xenial

** Tags added: dist-upgrade

** Tags removed: dist-upgrade
** Tags added: xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748540

Title:
  do-release-upgrade breaks if /etc/apt/preferences.d has a rule against
  a release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1748540/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 741528]

2011-04-09 Thread Timeless-bemail
the litmus test should be reworked to use the addons cert for which we
have the private key. in order to do this, the testcase will need to pin
<'now'> to be a fixed date (e.g. 2011-03-28), on the client system, and
the host will need to be happy to serve an expired certificate (possibly
by pinning the date to the same).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741528

Title:
  Compromised Comodo SSL certificates put users at risk

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 412647]

2011-01-25 Thread Timeless-bemail
If people don't mind, I'd like to request that this bug be limited to
technical comments on the current work and not political comments or
requests for features.

If people have questions beyond the actual technical code, I
respectfully request that they contact people via email, irc, or some
other means.

Note: Stefan's comments are on topic since they're technical review
points. The next four comments (including this one) are off-topic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647

Title:
  Firefox is not able to play mp4  tags

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 412647]

2011-01-21 Thread Timeless-bemail
Comment on attachment 503489
Latest Gstreamer patch

+static GstFlowReturn gst_fennecvideosink_buffer_alloc(GstBaseSink* aBsink,
+{
+  // Allocate a buffer with new
+  void *newBuffer;

+  // Allocating 128 byte aligned memory.
+  if (posix_memalign(&newBuffer, 128, ROUND_UP(aSize, 128)) != 0)
+newBuffer = NULL;

+  if (!*aBuf) {
+// Release the mem we got
+delete [] newBuffer;

coverity notes that delete (array) is wrong for void*. your allocator
here is posix memalign, so the release should be posix-something not c++
delete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647

Title:
  Firefox is not able to play mp4  tags

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 488354]

2011-01-09 Thread Timeless-bemail
*** Bug 532194 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488354

Title:
  NS_InvokeByIndex in xptcinvoke_arm.cpp is not Thumb-2 safe for Lucid

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 412647]

2010-10-19 Thread Timeless-bemail
>+NS_IMETHODIMP nsGStreamerDecoder::Observe(nsISupports *aSubjet,

please spell Subject correctly

>+  const PRUnichar *someData)

this should be aData - and this convention should be followed for all
arguments to functions...

-- 
Firefox is not able to play mp4  tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs